Astute-class Submarine - The most dangerous submarine in the world
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 01. 2022
- The British Astute-class nuclear-powered fleet submarines is likely to be the most advanced weapon outside the States. In today’s session, we will take a look at the most dangerous submarine outside the U.S. If you are curious to the answer, stayed tunned only at this channel!
There has been generally known that the most dangerous submarine in the world is owned by the U.S navy. However, it is important to note that there is also another country with the submarine as dangerous as the U.S does, that is the Royal navy’s one known as the Astute class submarine.
Other videos you might like:
Seawolf-class: ► • Seawolf-class: The Nav...
The Genius Tactic US Navy Submarine ► • The Genius Tactic US N...
How long can a submarine stay underwater? ► • How long can a submari...
Astute-class Submarine ► • Astute-class Submarine...
The secrets of submarines that enemy must not know ► • The secrets of submari...
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/ - Věda a technologie
These submarines and the Royal Navy make us proud.
I love how every time the video links back to the US. 'Most powerful/most advance submarine in operation...outside the US' must be said at least 10 times. It's just like in the film Team America, whenever there is a change in geographic location, it gives the name of the place, followed by how many miles away it is from the US. To be honest I don't know what else I expected when I go on a channel called 'Military TV'.
thats how us citizens are taught sadly.
'merica.
@@MRMK24 'murica!
Well said. Blind jingoism by this channel. They can't allow themselves to contemplate that another platform might be better than anything the US has. Such arrogance
“Up to 38 Guns in 6 21 inch torpedo tubes”. That’s amazing tech. Shooting guns out of the torpedo tubes is something no Navy will expect.
Aquatic stealth guns.
😆😆
🍄
Funny how it is stated: .....the Astute Class are the largest, most advanced and most powerful attack submarines ever operated.......by the Royal Navy
I love how every time the video links back to the US. 'Most powerful/most advance submarine in operation...outside the US' must be said at least 10 times. It's just like in the film Team America, whenever there is a change in geographic location, it gives the name of the place, followed by how many miles away it is from the US.
@@TheKnightTim I think the newer generation American attack subs are taking a lot from the astute, especially the advanced sound matting.
This is right ✅️ what you say ,thank god Britain maintained a nuclear deterrent, because we all know UK can never win a nuclear war with any of the big players but at least we ,ie Brits don't talk French,because that would have been the case if France kept nukes and Uk didn't, when will British government acknowledge that there biggest enemy is Continental Europe!!!
Might be wrong but isn't Britain got one of the best subs as in for like being hard to find and being one of the if not the most stealthy
Or has other country's hot better ones?
@@dannywest7587 "the UK can never win a nuclear war"?? No one wins a nuclear war. The UK has enough nuclear weapons to turn any continent into a Wasteland
The Astute-class is one of the best nuclear attack Submarines in the world.
No.
@@Ken_Marinaris No?
@@Ken_Marinaris um?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
oUtsIdE oF tHe US
@Grim Reaper Seawolf is the best.
HMS Astute (first in the class) went to wargame with US Naval assets around 2015 and gave the USN a bit of an unwelcome shock with its ability to hold US submarines (mostly ageing LA 688 boats) with targetting solutions using its Thales 2076 sonar while surface and air assets couldn't find it or track it. One comment from a US Naval officer, uncredited, was that the LA boats kicked back a dolphin-sized sonar image while the Astute's image size was that of a baby dolphin.
The more modern Virginias did better than the LA-class boats but the Block V Virginias being built right now are cruise-missile land-attack subs, not pure hunter-killers like the Astutes.
HMS Astute beat USS New Mexico together with two Arleigh Burke warships.
It’s the sonar and stealth combination of the Astute that makes it so fearsome.
Yes but lets not forget the most stealthy ship ever designed is Russian. The Admiral Kuznetsov is so advanced it sounds like a sea going tug to most sonar operators.
@@dusty4459 THE GOTLAND IS THE MOST ADVANCED AND LETHAL SUB EVER BUILT! Its so good that the US leased it to maker her subs and surface combatants better.
@@bbgcars You missed the joke. The Kuznetzov would breakdown and be towed by seagoing tugs hence it sounds like a tug to a sonar operator.
The astute are obsolete since the SUFFREN came out in 2019 weird a video made in 2022 still claim they are the best when they are not
Virginia class: These submarines use a nuclear reactor (S9G reactor) for propulsion, generating around 40,000 shaft horsepower, which drives a pump-jet propulsor.
Astute class: The Astute class also relies on a nuclear reactor (Rolls-Royce PWR2) for propulsion, providing approximately 43,000 shaft horsepower to a pump-jet propulsor.
The Royal Navy’s Astute class has a top speed of 30kn (56km/h; 35m/h) when fully submerged. The Virginia class is slower, reaching speeds of around 25kn (46km/h; 29m/h).
Virginia class: The Virginia class utilizes the advanced AN/BQQ-10 sonar suite, including bow, flank, and towed array sonars. It also features photonics masts with high-resolution cameras instead of traditional periscopes.
Astute class: The Astute class is equipped with the Thales 2076 sonar suite, featuring bow, flank, and towed array sonars. It also has optronic masts with high-resolution cameras.
It is understood that the Royal Navy's sesnors are far superior to that of the US. In 2012, during the joint exercise Fellowship, Astute performed simulated battles with the latest United States Navy Virginia-class submarine, USS New Mexico. Royal Navy Commander Iain Breckenridge was quoted, "Our sonar is fantastic and I have never before experienced holding a submarine at the range we were holding USS New Mexico. The Americans were utterly taken aback, blown away with what they were seeing".
The astute class are also equipped with a unique coating that absorbs sound (anechoic tiles) and a propulsion system that generates less noise to diminish their acoustic signature.
The only real advantage that Virginia has is that is carries a slightly bigger payload, making it more of a carrier type vessel than a true silent hunter-killer like the astute, which also happens to be smaller and can dive deeper.
Royal navy subs are the best nuff said
The Astute Class is the by far the best and most stealthy hunter killer in the world.
That would be the jimmy carter.
Well the updated seawolfs.
*outside of the US Navy
Seawolf-Class is still the most stealthy.
The stealthiest and deadliest submarine is the one we don't know about
@@ron3557Well everyone here had to be told about this one. Not only that British sub crews are the best in the world. They're the only nation that's sunk a ship with a nuclear powered carrier.
Bad Ass Ship !!! .. Cheers from USA/Philippines
Please please please build some of these for the Royal Australian Navy.
Honestly you don't want em
@@morgs456 Why?
@@camf7522 there are better options. BAE are awful at delivering these
@@camf7522 be better off with T boats
@Alex on budget and on time!!!! What are you on?! I want some lmao
They where 800 million over budget and 10 years late in 2018 pal
Yasen class is pretty good i heard
It's looking pretty good, yes.
It's Russia's first attack sub that might be able to fight with the best.
Not that we'll ever find out about it
True
Me too
I wish the RN wouild bring back the names at Jutland or Trafalgar, names like 'Iron Duke' 'Monarch' 'Colossus' 'Warspite' 'Thunderer' 'Agincourt' 'Revenge' 'Ramilles' 'Valiant' 'Invincible' 'Minotaur' and 'Conqueror' to name a few. The current boomers 'Vengeance' and 'Vanguard' are cool too as are the 'Dreadnought' class named boomers currently building.
I think there is a type 23 called Iron Duke
Agincourt will be the last Astute class sub. We had a Warspite.
@@phrankster909 We're going to have another Dreadnought, Valiant and Warspite
I can't believe they called the 2 carriers such crap names. I mean "Hermes", what a great name. Hermes was the messenger of the gods. Stop and think about that for a second. I can't think of a cooler name for a warship. Except maybe "Dreadnaught".
Coolest warship name is definitely Warspite 😊
Rule Britannia from Glasgow 🇬🇧 😎
Which hypersonic missiles does it fire then?
Probably the Perseus anti ship missiles in the near future
@@deadbeats7604 People will turn braindead in the future and not end sentences anymore like every 1st grader knows how to?
I have two problems with this. 1. The Astute kicked the ass of the USA's so-called best sub and we have an even better one now entering production. See Dreadnought for further details. 2. It's Barrow-in-FURNESS. It literally sounds how it's spelt. FUR-NESS.
As you were.
They should change it to Furiness which sounds much cuter.
@@757Poppy It depends on your pronunciation. Furi could also be perceived as Fury. Whatever entertains you, I guess.
@@jenni5104 Furriness, then.
@@jenni5104 besides the locals pronounce it Furn'ss, the e is dropped.
@@757Poppy I am literally a local and you're mansplaining the pronunciation to me?
Can detect boats leaving eastern American ports sat in the docks of the uk it’s that good
Great if America tries to invade. Xx
4 in service 3 more building.
Boats . Astute , Ambush . Artful . Audacious . Anson . Agamemnon . Agincourt.
Astute just completed 363 days at sea.
Australia should buy these, not the Yankee ones.
We’ll dub them: “Austute”
Thank you, thank you, I’m here all week.
They are silly watch the news
😆😆
🍄
SLBM are absolutely critical for maintaining the Western concept of MAD and projecting nuclear deterrence against current and emerging existential threats. But, I'm not sure UK defense budgets or UK leadership has the will to maintain this deterrence much longer - which will be a shame.
Last year UK Government said it has begun "increasing its nuclear warhead arsenal". After fact checking into the matter it turns out that they are decommissioning nuclear warheads and replacing them with newer ones, but also the trident missile will hold 2-3 extra warheads per missile in the future
So ... there will be no extra missiles just same amount but with 2-3 extra nuclear warheads per missile.
The British nuclear deterrent is going nowhere.
@@phrankster909 I hope so.
What where extremely good at is keeping our mouths shut about certain criteria
Thankfully we will not be giving up our deterrent and our new Dreadnaught class subs are being built as we speak. I wish we did not have to have a nuclear deterrent but sadly we have regimes that have no issue in throwing around threats and invading when they feel like it so we need our independent nuclear deterrent.
Beautiful ❤️ 🇬🇧
the astute has active deflection on the torpedo tubes that the americans don't have.
Can you explain what that does, please.
@@TheTriumfAnt are you a russian spy?
@@minilymo Nyet. Oops, I mean no, comrade.
@@minilymo Haha I love how you Russian spies cannot use capital letters for names like everyone learns ... outside your Russia? Yes that is tough. 1st grade basic grammar, lmao!
If we look at proof and evidence you do not give to your lies and disinformation as we see you proving you literally do not know how a sentence begins? Yes the annual NSA report to US Congress states that this is how we spot you commie trollers.
Burden of Proof is on you comrade.
@@TheTriumfAnt comrade
The sonar really is the best.
5000km range.
It could be in port and hear what's going on in New York.
By Thales.
Who are French.
Although the thales sonar group in in the UK.
Because we make the best sonar.
Which we sell to America.
Because that's how capitalism works
Rather 50 than 5k mi
“Thales underwater systems” the company that makes it are actually British. Thales bought over Thomson Marconi sonar. It’s like BAE Hagglunds is still a Swedish company.
@@scottwhitley3392
Really? That's good to hear.
As is all secret designs I wonder how is ensured that the secret information stays in the correct hands.
Hearing isn't just the ear.
The brain is where it's at.
don't forget we are talking about a country who thinks they are the land of the free but actually incarcerate more of their own citizens than any other country, who has a world series but only exclusive to themselves, and were nuked by RAF vulcans in war games... twice!
Are you Russian by any chance :)
Don't forget the Buccaneers doing the same twice during Red Flag and Warspite taking out a carrier and three other ships during Ocean safari in the 70s. The valiants were amazing boats which spent most of our time in the barents causing great headaches for the russians. One RO special was greatly amused to hear a little song being sung by a russian radio operator which had a chorus of " The Admiral wants to know how close is the Brit to my keel" Nice to know they have a sense of humour. The answer would have been "about 12 foot away!" we have always had the craziest but brilliant skippers ,boats and crews.
I don't get the statement of having 38 guns in it torpedo tubes.
True value of a submarine only appears obvious during time of war, not in time of peace. 🤫
I am looking further
I like submarine
I cannot believe that the UK doesn't have at least 10 of them. It's a bargain.
The problem is manning them, we don't have the numbers unfortunately. Struggling to fill the 5 we have at the minute, quality over quantity.
Yeah, it's the best if it comes out of the port and doesn't break.
why these sups are not being built for Australia is beyond me
Esto es verdad hasta que este año entregue Navantia a la marina española el submarino no nuclear más avanzado del mundo. A ver que pasa cuando pasen por el estrecho de Gibraltar. Con capacidad de estar un mes bajo el agua y no depender de la superficie para cargar las baterías gracia a su sistema AIF. También es más silencioso que los submarinos propulsados por energía nuclear, pasará delante de un Astute y no se enterará. Por supuesto puede portar Tomahawk
France 🇫🇷 and Britain
, France and 🇬🇧 has always been friends
Typical yank crap !! The Astutes are the best boats in the world by miles !! Even the Seawolf doesn't match the Astutes !! Ask you admirals and captains !!
Nothing is better than Seawolf. We only have 3 of them but that's all we need. Astute is a great boat but we gave UK the reactor design.
Every nuke sub is great from 🇬🇧
Barrowin “Fureness” That is terrible, I an Australian and I know that is WRONG!
Weirdly, he says it correctly not longer after.
I'm not denying that it is good SSN, but its missile armament looks subpar to chinese or russian counter parts, no?
And its like their №1 job - go highseas and wreak havoc on surface ships via missiles
It’s role it’s to protect sea lanes, be that by engaging surface or sub surface enemies. They’re also pretty good at area denial, just the chance that an SSN is in the area will keep the bad guys in port (see the Falklands conflict for an example)
I was a submariner in the RN. Russian and especially Chinese subs are that loud they may as well live broadcast their position. I’d be confident on a astute class wiping out a pack of Chinese subs without them ever knowing it was there.
The Royal Navy's submarines are designed for anti submarine warfare as their first prioirty.
...its job is to find and sink enemy submarines. All other roles are subordinate. Missiles are toys. Spearfish is not.
The Chinese and Russian missiles are crap. This is a high end boat with elite crew. Well maintained with exceptional personnel
What the US Submarine Fleet has in the amount of Submarines and Ships, does not take away the fact that the UK Navy's Sailors are by far the best in the world..
Two specific mishaps come to mind… one. run aground… Court Martial and reduced in rank ….. two, crazy rank shoots two people in the ready room..one died I think??🙄It’s not the boat it’s the crew🤨
Guys being shot in the control room is very much an isolated incident. One did run aground yes, again isolated, certainly compaired to some Navies......@@alanhutchins5916
Chin full counter this submarine
I think that this documentary sounds a lot like a cheap advert that tries its best to convince you that it spells the best in its category, but... what about the russians, french, chinese??? how old are the so call high techs mentionned in this video??? for exemple; about the sonar being the best, it is the best actually but it's not british, the sonar has been developped by the French group Thales, and just for informative purposes, the israeli forces are the number one in the world about taking any existing weapon and transformes it to something that calls for respect, it's another level.
Thales is jointly owned by British and French and I think some others (but not sure)
@@billcook7483 Thales is French and owns Thales UK and some others . BAE (through an options agreement) forced Thomson, renamed Thales, to purchase its stake in 2001. The company was renamed Thales Underwater Systems.
@@jureeratpholseela7508 yeah so what I don't really think that matters the point is they have plants in the UK where a lot of the design work is done we still retain the KNOW-HOW and as far as I'm concerned Thales is a pretty good company knows what it's doing and it doesn't really matter whether it's French or not, as long as it does the job. personally I like the look of a lot of the new Russian hardware Russian stuff looks great the ships look great and I think we should be buying some of it especially the 30 mm close-in weapon systems. Thales works very well in conjunction with the British requirements, and I'm sure they appreciate the British money.
@@billcook7483 I agree with you, it was just a precision to your reply "but not sure"
there is a difference between 'in the world' and 'in the world outside the us'. i clicked on this because i thought you were going to show that the british sub was better than the americans and russians. i wouldnt have otherwise.
on another note, no nuclear submarine has been tried in a real battle, so no one can say for certain which is more effective than which
Well, except for the Churchill class HMS Conqueror.
People always forget we have actually fought with our attack subs, we're the _only_ country to have fought with our attack subs
@@MostlyPennyCatIn which field of your country did you fight that did not kill unequally and weakly?Didn't the hollow grandeur and empty propaganda of your country expose you last year when the Iranian ship was seized by your country and Iran retaliated with authority?
They can also identify every ship that leaves NY without leaving British waters..! ooops!
Every sub are all "most" dangerous, these machine won't function properly without the help of other parts of the Armed Forces...
I'm glad to see our Allies manning up. Lord knows our enemies sure are!
Why uk not participating in Indian p75 project. Even astute class sub is batter than barracuda class sub
Because you can’t be trusted with the technology. It would end up in Chinese and Russian hands
@@lewissparkesnot Chinese but certainly Russian unless the Russians are silly enough to give it to the Chinese! 😂
And now there is the French Suffren which does better 😁👌🏻
💪🇺🇸
Funny...you just need someone to belive that...
What about russia? You didnt hear of it?
Made in Soviet or Russia??
@@Military-TV Can you make a video on the Yasen amd the new yasen M class Russian SSGN's?
@@Military-TV have you been sleeping under a rock? Russia is making the newest and most advanced subs to date, Yasen Class and Bprei class, lliving alone Belgorod class.
@@Military-TV is that matter?
Will they also need a sea going tug to accompany them like your carrier kusnetsov when they break down. 😂
Sorry got to be said the Vanguard class is more dangerous than the astute the astute doesn't have the capabilities to launch nukes
They are 2 completely different types of subs. Its like comparing a car to a bus
if you want to end the world? you win ,it kind of like saying the best missile is a tomahawk .oh unless you want to launch a atom bomb
Royal Navy submarines are called Boats, not Ships.
From what iv read and seen astute and Virginia are very close with more weapons going us and speed going to the UK boats to close to call if you ask me but as I'm sure teck and improvement are shared between the two there both as good as they are because of shared teck and development arguing who the best is pointless they are well ahead of the rest because of each other and any advantages one has over the other is simply as a result of ongoing development between them both
If ASTUTE wasn't better than current US types, then AUKUS would be spelt AUS. I have to add that ASTUTEs use a lot of US technology (thank you Yanks)
@user-nu6bl4ru2q I am not just talking about submarine technology and you're right, we've pioneered pump jets and 'stealth technology' too, but we could not have afforded to have developed reactors with natural circulation (ie no pumps at patrol speeds) which makes a huge difference. We rely perhaps too heavily on the USN for many things other than kit, such as access to their intelligence.
But in our favour, I also think we have a different culture which is more aggressive and less constrained by orthodoxy. In the past ,US submarines were given so many equipment upgrades, they didn't have time to learn to use all the capability.
I was always confident of our ability to hold our own with any opponent and the Spearfish gave us a huge advantage when it was introduced. But we 're not spending much on missiles !
So credit where credit is due, we’ve got here working together and I am glad that we haven’t wasted money researching and developing the same things.
Translate please
>most dangerous submarine outside the US
lmao. Borey and Typhoon and Yasen class are laughing outlaud
Don't be jealous, you know the astute is the best.
@@illyaedwards7188 sure-sure. whatever keeps you fine
@@RedboRF it's what the reality is, Astute will destroy any of those rust bucket Russian subs with ease.
@@illyaedwards7188 sure sure. I never argue with those who has a little knowledge / data. have a nice day fren.
@@RedboRF even the Americans have said the astute sub is the best in the world.
If you want to find out the truth, I suggest you research the Global Hawk UAV and check it out before building this giant UAV to reach its destiny and then with a little thought find out all the facts of your shame. take. .
I suggest you live in the real world with unshakable facts and seek honesty, because there is no end to absurd propaganda and the spread of false currents. In this world, God cares for the world and its creatures ...
2:28 Is English not your first language? "makes this submarine very advanced and versatile on the battle fields". A clue is in the name! Submarines operate under the surface of seas and oceans, not in fields.
The Americans tell us that their submarines are the best in the world, their fighters are best, their tanks are the best and their artillery etc, etc. Certainly the United States do have very good weaponry but the best? Time will tell.
Don't know where people are getting this 'American technology' thing from.
Israeli yes.
We're one of the premier weapons manufacturing nations in the world.
BAE is freaking _enormous_
Very strange.
US and UK collaborate on nuclear propulsion.
BAE Systems actually makes the newer VPM tomahawk Missile Module for the Virginia Class (Block-V), also the technology behind pump-jet propulsion is from the shared UK technology programme, so it works both ways.
BAE Systems? Formally known as in British Aerospace Systems? Yeah, we British (sorry, Briddish) are quite proud of them AND Rolls-Royce Engineering.
The only problem is that the UK has only 4 in service and will end up with 7 subs in a decade or 2 when they are finally built, complete sea trials and put into service. Mmmmmm
UK's obsession with health care has made the Royal Navy weaker.
what about the russian Belogrod?! I mean it has multiple nuclear torpedos and can even cause a tsunami with those torpedos, and im pretty sure its also the largest sub
Probably the fact that it's propaganda and will likely not even be able to submerge knowing Russia's tech level...
The PWR2 is a dangerous reactor and the UK was given access by the US to the Virginia class S9G design for use on the Dreadnought class as the PWR3.
Not dangerous. Very reliable.
@@phrankster909 look up PWR2 nuclear reactor, it says it had coolant leaks and was a significant danger to the crew and the public.
Lmao the Astute beat the Virginia class in naval games. Even the US admiral said he'd never seen anything like it. Why would we borrow the design of that sub for our next generation subs to use with ROLLS ROYCE reactors that are not only reliable and the best in the world but also... BRITISH.
Look it up.
@@jenni5104 Nothing the UK has is the best, the UK doesn't have the budget or the R&D for that. The UK military is designed to fit into the US military.
👍😎🍺🍩🚢
Just not fact. But may be true. Usa doesn’t have the most dangerous subs. Or even the best.
Absolutely we have the best subs in the world
@@carryfreak5059 opinion not fact
Virginia class: These submarines use a nuclear reactor (S9G reactor) for propulsion, generating around 40,000 shaft horsepower, which drives a pump-jet propulsor.
Astute class: The Astute class also relies on a nuclear reactor (Rolls-Royce PWR2) for propulsion, providing approximately 43,000 shaft horsepower to a pump-jet propulsor.
The Royal Navy’s Astute class has a top speed of 30kn (56km/h; 35m/h) when fully submerged. The Virginia class is slower, reaching speeds of around 25kn (46km/h; 29m/h).
Virginia class: The Virginia class utilizes the advanced AN/BQQ-10 sonar suite, including bow, flank, and towed array sonars. It also features photonics masts with high-resolution cameras instead of traditional periscopes.
Astute class: The Astute class is equipped with the Thales 2076 sonar suite, featuring bow, flank, and towed array sonars. It also has optronic masts with high-resolution cameras.
It is understood that the Royal Navy's sesnors are far superior to that of the US. In 2012, during the joint exercise Fellowship, Astute performed simulated battles with the latest United States Navy Virginia-class submarine, USS New Mexico. Royal Navy Commander Iain Breckenridge was quoted, "Our sonar is fantastic and I have never before experienced holding a submarine at the range we were holding USS New Mexico. The Americans were utterly taken aback, blown away with what they were seeing".
The astute class are also equipped with a unique coating that absorbs sound (anechoic tiles) and a propulsion system that generates less noise to diminish their acoustic signature.
The only real advantage that Virginia has is that is carries a slightly bigger payload, making it more of a carrier type vessel than a true silent hunter-killer like the astute, which also happens to be smaller and can dive deeper. @@carryfreak5059
Subs are boats not ships , shows how much you know divvy yank
Russia Putin had better pay attention to this video on Astute class submarine
Foxtrot Oscar
Stop rubbing yourself.
so, could an Astute-class sub enter the Black Sea undetected? just sayin'.... this one 'merican is glad we are allies🇬🇧🇺🇸🇦🇺🇳🇿😅
It's extremely unlikely anything can go into the black sea undetected considering it'd have to pass through the Bosphorous strait which is barely 100m deep.
Bacon And Egg systems
El mas peligroso del mundo es el S80. No esa bazofia 😂
As a former US Submariner, I can honestly say that the Astute is better than any US Virginia class at being a hunter killer. The Seawolf class remains the best hunter killers in the world.
👎 clickbait title…
😂 🤣 🤪 Blind Submarines
🤣😂
It is fact that the us top two are not even close to the astute the virginia and the seawolf are outdated already and comparing them with uk astute is embbarising
US remastered submarine
Funny how it beats literally everything you've got. Yes, they tested it against your best sub. Yes. It smoked your lame ass. Yes. The US admiral admitted it. But you do you.
Good, that russians arent dangerous. We should force them to give up
I don't believe YOU !
Guess they missed sea wolf…..
Yes, they did.
To be honest who cares about whos got the best sub,as long as they work together the Russians have a massive problem,and those Russian subs are not to be laughed at as well.
It's a really great submarine, even though it has technology borrowed from US.......😅
Such as what?
we haven't borrowed anything from the US anything from the US is both bought and paid for this is quite normal practice back in world war II was the British who were giving technology to America particularly in the case of the magnetron and later the spin tune magnetron for radar developed invented in Britain it's normal practice. same could be said for jet engine technology the game invented in Britain technology given to America.
It's like people don't understand how capitalism works.
We build stuff and we buy stuff
No point in duplicating work.
@@billcook7483 dude, even it's Sonar technology was derived from the Virginia classes Sonar (but Astute's is more powerful) Powerful....The Americans are the ones who funded almost half the entire program cost for the astute program.....But all being said, it's one of the most powerful submarines though.....😏
@@MostlyPennyCat Who said you guys duplicated American tech? You guys made a hybrid of US and UK tech and made it much more efficient and effective.....
It's horrible
It hasn't went up against a Seawolf yet and it probably won't. The Navy is very secretive about them. Astute is good but not as good as the Seawolf.
@@dc-4ever201 Maybe so but Seawolf is quieter & faster than any sub even now. They are meant to be a missile boat killer. You don't know they're there until it's too late.
@@chrisdean6700 but if both are so quiet will they just pass by and not know they was that close... who will know
@@dennislions1 Haha, you never know. I think we Yanks & the Brits work closely together on such matters.
Perhaps, But the Seawolf class's price tag was so eye wateringly high the US only built 3. Not sure how it would perform out numbered 2-1 🤔
@@Markus117d They say the Virginia Class is just as good...but who knows.
Rule Britannia. Britannia rules the waves.
Typical US arrogance throughout
There's isn't an attack sub as advanced as Astute.
Except for Seawolf
With technology borrowed from USA 🤣🤣🤣🤣😏
Define?
@@cowansimstudio Let me tell you that even the British and the Indians know that British took out 43 trillion rupees from India alone so you're much powerful and technologically advanced by using our money and then as a sidekick to USA going wherever that USA goes let me tell you WW2/1 in all major wars USA came for aid to you guys and USA helped you in nuclear technology which it got itself from some german scientist who fled Germany and also there were US scientist but all the technology needed for being nuclear power was assisted by US and without nuclear technology this submarine is just steel pure blacl steel and yes the world knows that US is always there to aid the UK
@@saishaktipanda you realise that the scientists behind the Manhattan project were mostly British and French
@@almightykingpin6322 yes yes also ful of Soviet spies but don't say that Germany didn't helped because infact Germany was the one who first thought about nuclear bombs
true haha why should the royal navy throw out money for technology, if they can get it nearly for free
My love for the US military is unquenchable. I wish it’s possible to join even if you are a US citizen.
I'd put a seawolf up against any sub out there
Yasen would give it a run
@@morgs456 Yes, it would but Seawolf would prevail
It's not Murican ...
MURICAN!!
"Astute-class Submarine - The most dangerous submarine in the world." Yes for the crew by all accounts! That's on the few occasions they are seaworthy.
Hilarious the "best in the world " outside the USA.....you seriously need to get a life and hold of the facts...ask the USN how they faired against Astute in war games Duh!!!
80% of British weaponry he's from America, the British are not fully independent from America the would' have to ask permission if they want to use those weapons, especially nuclear weapons, hopefully never,
Surge- Think you are abit backwards please tell us all how the UK has to ask America to use its nukes lol ??
@@loyalist5736
"If the United States were to withdraw their cooperation completely, the UK nuclear capability would probably have a life expectancy measured in months rather than years".
Not only are Britain's Trident missiles in a common pool shared with the US and maintained in Kings Bay, Georgia, its nuclear warheads are designed and maintained at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston with the help of US know-how, as recently declassified documents on the UK-US Mutual Defence Agreement confirmed.
Tuesday's report noted: "The UK is dependent on the United States for many component parts of the guidance and re-entry vehicle, and for the Trident ballistic missile system itself".
The Trident Commission was set up by the thinktank, BASIC (The British American Security Information Council). Its work was unded by the Quaker-based Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and the Ploughshares Fund which may be disappointed, but should not be surprised, by the conclusions.
A commission co-chaired by the former Labour defence secretary, Lord Des Browne, the former Tory defence and foreign secretary, Sir Malcolm Rifkind, and the former LibDem leader and shadow foreign secretary, Sir Menzies Campbell, was never going to come up with radical proposals on this issue.
No party, bar the Greens, the SNP in Scotland and Plaid Cymru in Wales, is going to come out against Trident before next year's general election (though whoever wins will have to decide what would be sacrificed to pay for it).
Tuesday's report rejects Labour's traditional line that Trident should be kept as a "general insurance against an uncertain future" (to quote Tony Blair) or to maintain the UK's status, or that it is needed to preserve a valuable pool of skilled naval engineers. No, the commission's members were too clever to justify Trident on those grounds alone.
Instead, they argue this: "If there is more than a negligible chance that the possession of nuclear weapons might play a decisive future role in the defence of the United Kingdom and its allies, in preventing nuclear blackmail, or in affecting the wider security context within which the UK sits, then they should be retained".
Even if the chances of "strategic blackmail or nuclear attack" appear slim today, there is "insufficient certainty surrounding the prospect that it would be imprudent" to abandon Trident, argue the authors of the report.
Potential future threats are listed as: the re-emergence of a nuclear threat from a large nuclear arsenal (the only current example of such a possibilty is Russia, says the report); "an existing or emerging nuclear-armed threat" that "attains global reach"; and "the emergence of a future massive overwhelming threat involving bio-weapons or other comparable mass destruction technologies still unknown..."
Yet all this seems to amount to a "general insurance against an uncertain future" in all but name.
The members of the commission include professor Alison Bailes, former head of the FO's security policy department, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, UK ambassador to the UN at the time of the invasion of Iraq, Lord Guthrie, former chief of defence staff, professor Lord Hennessy, the historian, and Lord Rees, Astronomer Royal and recent president of the Royal Society, .
They say that the UK should step up efforts to promote multilateral nuclear disarmament, and consider further steps to reduce Britain's operational stockpile of nuclear warheads to below 120.
They make clear they are divided over whether or not the UK should abandon its continuous at sea deterrence (CASD as it is known) with one Trident submarines always on patrol, and whether the new Trident fleet should consist of three rather than four submarines, and over whether a decision to replace the existing fleet could be postponed.
The cost of building four new Trident submarines alone is officially estimated to be £20bn (£4bn a year in the mid 2020s). The capital cost of a new system - minus running costs and (the often forgotten) decommissioning costs - is estimated by Paul Ingram, BASIC's executive director, to total £50.6bn between 2012 and 2062.
"No-one should suffer any illusion that this capability is cheap, and that there will be few opportunity costs", says the report. "Retaining the deterrent could negatively impact on other valuable security and defence capabilities."
Unanswered questions remain, notably those surrounding the entire credibility of the deterrent. Would a British prime minister ever credibily threaten to use, ever need to use, let alone actually give the order to fire, nuclear weapons against any country.
The report even goes far as to say "there could be future circumstances in which we face a strategic threat...in which the United States would not obstruct the UK exercising its independent operation".
That is surely stretching credibility way too far.
These issues need to be aired, and MPs and prospective MPs, confronted with them.
@@Sergecalifornia You high?! 😂
1. 80%?
The purchase of 48 F-35B combat planes and the Trident II-D missile system we buy/use from the USA isn't 80% British weaponry that we have in are arsenal. Also guns, artillery, tanks, warships, submarines, other planes are mostly British made 'OR' are designed and used cooperation with other NATO allies.
2. Permission?
So you saying that in the case of the F35-B that we can only use them when we get permission really?
'OR' that we can only launch are nukes just because the Trident II-D missile payload system is USA made?
*If you buy a TV from me, do you need my permission on what channels you can watch after purchase? lol
Only deal is that the shared or used technology will not be shared or sold without permission of said developer/country.*
3. Nuclear Warheads used in the Trident II-D SLBM's are British made by The Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in the UK. USA does have not have any military power on the launch of UK Nuclear Arms and vice versa.
@@englishmisfit9881 we are talking about weapons, not TV lol.
Doesn't matter, its common logic ...
Why would any country buy arms from the US just to have the US have military control their use, that is retarded.
Only arms contract in place is 'Globally Standard' that the technology is not shared to a third party nation without consent, nor can they be sold to a third party without consent.
Hence why the UK does not share/sell 'advanced' weaponry to India due to the friendly relationship with Russia.
FACT:
US holds legal rights to Nuclear Submarine Reactor development that is sold rights to the UK.
UK holds legal rights to Pump-jet Propulsion development that is sold the right to the US.
It works both ways ...
90% of technology is American, that's great,
Well let's be honest.... if there's one thing that the USA excels at it is at designing weapons to kill people with.
Just like how the us carriers are mostly British tech ;)
@@michaelafrancis1361 usually weapon is to kill people
@@mattkerr3508 maybe in the 1920s, but not anymore, American and French nuclear aircraft carriers are the best, not unlike the British conventional trampoline aircraft carrier, equipped with American F 35 airplane.🤣🤣🤣
@@Sergecalifornia so American carriers don't have catapults or angled flight deck. And the aircraft ain't power by jets. Really the first true aircraft carrier was British
I love my country and I love and respect my heroes armed forces. But we the UK is a joke. Don't get me wrong the armed forces will have a go. But due to government cuts we don't have enough ships, troops, weapons etc. We spend more out side of the UK then we should inside. Even then we still spending on those who shouldn't be here.
Which hypersonic missiles does it fire then?
Probably the Perseus anti ship missiles in the near future
None they don't work under water.
Well not yet but they probably will in the future.