Amazing Geoptik Nadira Observation Chair For Astronomy

Geoptik, in cooperation with the firm "Amadori Design" presents NADIRA, the new multi-functional chair. The ideal companion in astronomical observations for comfort.
Made of 20mm thick beech plywood. Dimensions are 920x400x50mm and is characterized by:
Unique design,
Very versatile with the advantage of adjusting the position of the seat to six different heights,
Adjustment of the large backrest,
Comfortable in astronomical observations with Dobsonian and refractor telescopes,
Very useful in astronomical observations with binoculars,
Two handles with which you can carry it comfortably and balanced,
Very compact; the seat can be placed behind the chair where it is fastened with magnets.
Chair Heigh: from 23 cm to 78 cm.
Maximum load 130 kg.
Weight: 4,9 Kg.

[@AAE-cg1il]

I am shopping for astro chair. This one is nice like IKEA……..I like the two notches as it seems like it would be stronger and safer.

[@TheAstronomer]

Don't buy this Geoptik chair. I bought this after I read a moderator in Star Gazers Lounge astronomy forum wrote a five star review about it. Then I discovered he has put it for sale! It became clear he wrote that review for getting rid of it quickly. It is the worst seat I have ever used. It is such a pain on the crotch. There is a kind of chair which is called industrial worker's chair which is £100 in Japan. It is very popular in Japan with telescope users. In UK it is imported by an American company which sells it for £400. If you can not afford it, an ironing chair will do. I use mostly my Skywatcher observing chair, but you have to sit on the tip of the seat to stop it dropping you down suddenly. Other than that it is a good chair.

[@32_bits]

It will be good to have your feedback after using it for a 2 to 4 hours observing session.

[@nordmende73]

Thank you very much! 😊

[@TheAstronomer]

Don't Buy it. It is a pain on the proverbial "down under" part of the body. Probably the most uncomfortable seat ever. A Skywatcher observing chair is much better.

[@nordmende73]

Thanks again! 😅