Johnny Depp lawyer uses poop story to challenge Amber Heard expert | LiveNOW from FOX
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 05. 2022
- Amber Heard's expert witness Catheryn Arnold was asked rapid-fire questions by Johnny Depp's attorney during the former couple's defamation trial. During on particular line of questioning, Depp's attorney noted the negative stories regarding feces allegedly left in Depp's bed and discussed with the witness how the negative coverage was unrelated to statements made by Depp's attorney Adam Waldman. Heard is countersuing Depp claiming the statements by Waldman calling her abuse accusations a hoax were defamatory and destroyed her acting career.
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! czcams.com/users/livenowfox?su...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
The negative decline in her career happened when the phone recording came out. And even more so when the world found out she didn’t donate the 7 million to charity. Waldman had nothing to do with it.
facts
You got that all wrong. She pledge the 7 millions dollars. Her career is rebounding, it's only a matter of a few decades.
@@TestTest-ve4ih lol
@@chelsea3564 bless yours for not knowing that's sarcasm
actions was and has been her decline
a social media expert not knowing semantics in conversation is like hiring a blind surgeon
exactly! correlation analysis is a very basic statistic analysis that is used in many fields. I am surprised an expert can't even distinguish the difference of correlation and causation which is not a term in statistics.
I know, I was thinking to myself, ''listen, lady, if you're going to use words in this trial, you're going to need to know the difference between 'correlation and causation''.
lol guys when you’re a witness on a stand being cross-examined you want to avoid answering as many opposition questions as you can. She is doing what she’s supposed to.
Where on earth did AH's team find these 'expert' witnesses?
You miss her reason for skipping this and explaining why she's not a semantic expert. So stop trying to be an expert! Its so obvious why she responded as she did!
Just having Depp’s attorney say “Amber Turd” in front of her with a full courtroom was everything 🤣🤣🤣
I know! How did everyone not bust out laughing?
@@bmyra I’m sure they were laughing behind the cameras.
I like "flush the turd' also!
@@stacyward4309 what about Aquaturd?
This guy is brilliant, so confident, experienced and able to guide the witnesses to the truth. Johnny has the best legal team. They're so enjoyable to watch.
"Waldman didn't talk about defecation." He very cleverly trapped her, that was a very good piece of lawyering.
An expert witness that doesn’t know Robert Patterson is the new Batman, doesn’t know who Patrick Wilson is, doesn’t know of AH prior movies but knows that aquaman made a lot of money although fails to realize it was because of Jason, not Amber. Fantastic “expert” witness
Also the stand is a flop!! With only 28 mil budget. Lol. Joke
lol I guess you also dont know him very well cuz his name is Robert Pattinson.
@@ashamedashley389 the commentator certainly still knows more than Amber‘s so called „expert“.
Sounds like a guy with a life.
Yes about Jayson big box office stair not the other person come on now
This lady has made a fool of herself. She literally tried to bluff her way through. She just remembered what she was supposed to and didn’t have a clue about anything else. How embarrassing. Half of AH witnesses have done more damage then good.
Take it your team amber
@@thebeardedbudgettraveler6871 absolutely not
It cracks me up that she didn’t know she wasn’t in blade
@@honeybee6858 highlight of the day was the lawyer asking the DR if he watched Willy wonker 😂😂 🤦🏼♀️ the guys horse lips 😂
Not knowing who Alice Eve was or that Chris Pine was Captain Kirk. I thought she was an expert on Hollywood.
She’s absolutely unqualified. Like everyone else on Heard’s side. Watching her witnesses testify is like watching a road accident happening in real time🤦🏽♀️
Word!
train wreck in slow motion
It figures JD would get blamed for 'bad publicity' even though people just saw AH for what she really is .. which is a scheming liar .
It is so clear that Johnny Depp should loose here. Amber didn't make him a heavy drunk and junkie, and he made his layer destroy Amber's reputatiion.
@@youkasiia being a drunk or a junkie doesn't make you an abuser. And to be fair she started demolishing his reputation long before this trial
Everyone going on about Mrs Vasquez which is cool but this lawyer is badass at slowly dismantling their points, made the male psychiatrist look like a psycho.
He's a far better attorney than Vasquez. She's childish and unprofessional. A lot of the lawyers, on both sides, in this trial are very unprofessional, but Vasquez is probably the worst.
Could you imagine needing psychiatric help and being put in front of this opinionated ,argumentative individual .You would want drugs just yo get through it.
@@Janice_Kinase you're completely wrong. Her style is to bait them into standing by a statement that they've previously contradicted then present them with the contradiction.
When you are learning this type of interrogation, you learn that if you are getting under the skin of the witness then they let their story slip in favour of trying to fight you. Emotions take over.
@@flippineck2825 YES
@@Janice_Kinase I’m actually interested in why you think so? Do you mind elaborating?
The lawyer here is quietly brilliant. The light stutter is actually very disarming. It gives people this idea that they can take him less seriously, and this man wields it like a freaking weapon. His soft spoken method and light speech impediment is just the mask over a razor wit and master legal cunning. Honestly, I was shocked how well he performed after first hearing him speak.
💢well said. At first I thought in the negative description you said first. But it dawned on me that it seems more tactical and controlled than just randomly used. After reading your comment, it made much more sense that is exactly what is happening. He is extremely brilliant and well prepared. Well done on your assessment
Thank you. I’ve been trying to say that myself. I think that his style . He’s a smooth operator. Johnny’s team is a “TURDANATOR “!
I agree
Right. He basically got her to prove why Amber should not be recieving the amount she sued for even If she can win this case. Amber set herself up, she underestimated Johnny's lawyers. They are using her own "experts" against her while proving their expertise to be unreliable.
a bit like columbo , they underestimate him when in fact he is sharp as a tack
I am in awe that this woman has been hired as an expert to testify when she has absolutely no evidence. Insane! Embarrassing!
I am not!! kinda follows the others
Not one of her witnesses made sense to me dawg it's crazy!
Another one that will be jobless because of Amber lol
That’s their 15 minutes of fame!!!
This guy is brilliant. He’s the true giant on JD’s team. Camille may have more appeal to social media kids but the way this guy operates, spreads his net and traps those ‘experts’ is just genius.
Yeah I’m in love with him he’s the beeest !!!
I thought the same.
I agree he's a master at what he's doing
This ”expert” is bullshitter and nice to see her get tangled in the web of her lies
Not saying dude isn't brilliant, but the witness is a buffoon. She doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation and she doesn't know that if it's true it's not defamation 🤣
Girl they literally teach correlation doesn’t equal causation in HIGH SCHOOL, how as a full grown “career professional” do you not know that?!
social media professional never took intro to psychology
She's not an expert in semantics? Like.OK? So you don't understand the words or what?
Exactly!!! This is basic information! What exactly is is she an expert in?
Seems more like she’s a huge fan of Lumber Turd like damn 🤣
@@golpop that doesn't come only in psychology, it appears in almost every field. Science, law, maths etc.
What Amber, like every narcissist, does not want to accept is that she harmed herself, not the media, not the people, she was herself with her actions and her lies
Yes!!! Across the line with ALL narcissists...
Great point!
A. did cause her own popularity decline. The "tree" called A. started the first "fire" just by the way she treated JD from the beginning. Even if she wins, she still looses bc it's the public in the long run that buys movies, clothes, magazines...whatever she's connected to. Pretty sad.
Well said 👏👏
YEP, YOU ARE SPOT ON!!!!
Yes!!! Agree with you!!!👍👌
The problem with this witness is that she's projecting Heard's "potential" loss of revenue "IF" her career skyrockets.
You cannot be certain her career would do so because there is not enough history for her.
This lady chose success stories as her baseline for what to expect for Heard going forward.
But there are so many failures she would have been just as wrong to compare Heard to.
Paul Hogan was so successful as Dundee and then his career tanked.
On the other side, Depp's team isn't projecting potential losses at all.
They are calculating losses based on projects Johnny was in line for that are on the table NOW.
This lady screams bias against Depp.
the worst part is, when amber loses, she will blame her lawyers & witnesses. not herself for her own mistakes. it's really sad it almost feels like bc of that, justice will never be truly served.
My thoughts exactly. In her mind she’ll never be responsible for any wrongdoing. Maybe Johnny should’ve slapped some sense into her. Or given it the old college try anyway.
the fact is that you are mistaken to believe she will lose anything...the worst outcome is that she will be offered free therapy for life because she is still a victim and a FEMALE
@@bigheart270 unfortunately she did this to herself. she never suffered any PHYSICAL abuse. & she also JUST admitted the op ed was about johnny. so that's about it lol case closed. that's what the trial was about anyway.
@@bigheart270 it sucks that a narcissistic psychopath like amber has this much screen time at all :( i hope she DOES get help because she needs it. maybe now she truly will have PTSD.
Always blaming others....what's that sound like?
This is ridiculous she did a lot of shady stuff during that time, that caused the general public to dislike her.
Please name the shady things she's done.
@@zulygirl4412 pooping in the marital bed and blaming it on the dogs. illegally traveling to Australia with the dogs and blaming the lack of paperwork for the dogs on her P.A
ZulyGirl I won’t say she did anything bad because I have no idea. To me, she is just an awful actress. For them to say the movie was successful because of her…she is the reason we didn’t buy the movie, download, etc. Not a personal fan of Nicole Kidman, however she did a great job in the movie. She showed love and empathy. Amber as an actress🤢
there are temporal links of witnesses being threatened and their depositions made against ambers story.
Kari ikr! Catheryn Arnold embarrassed herself lol smh
I don't think this lawyer has been objected to once during this entire trial. He's too good.
he sounds kind of nervous and soft when he talks but actually he is a stone cold killer, he is very good. his demeanour makes you think he is not...at first.
One might say he’s got a speech impediment.
Also they have him do the more minor parts of the trial and witnesses. It’s less contentious. Had they had him cross Amber or Johnny there would have been a lot more activity from opposite counsel.
It was a tactic using Camille…woman to a woman. He is great with grilling this witnesses and Camille was also a killer during her cross on AH. They make an excellent team
He's a partner at the law firm representing Johnny, so this guy must be very well versed in trial.
Dennison is stellar, as is Waldman, Chew, Vasquez, Curry!!!
The fact that Amber Heard can keep a stoic look when the depp lawyer says Amber Turd is actually impressive.
That's shame
The judicial system needs to look at how hired “expert witnesses” is a major flaw in cases. It is hard to remain impartial when you are being paid big dollars by one party.
The solution they’ve clearly come up with is to just pay both
She literally said Causation and Correlation are just semantics, despite them being objectively very, very different things
Amber is one of the strangest people I've ever heard of. Any decline in her popularity and acting career is because of her own doing, and something she'll never take responsibility for. The reason this trial is taking place and exposing what she's really like is her own fault because of the false accusations and lies she's made.
But amber continues to drag it out making it worse for herself, battling ever step of the way, gaslighting the world. She should have settled so the defacation didn't come out. That all on herself.
She could be sitting pretty with that seven million right now but instead she's going to have to pay the charities AND owe Johnny($50million??) 😆
She is not a good actress. Low grade movies is all she is good for. This is my own opinion.
Meghan Markle acts just like her . Both believe their own lies .
I don't think it's technically gaslighting if it's only working on like 2% of people who are Turd fans. Lol. She's TRYING to gaslight and failing miserably with a large majority of us.
The fact that she’s asking double what Depp is asking only further shows her aggression and abusive nature.
It really does
great point and observation!
She's a gold-digger.
It only goes to show she thinks she's worth more as an actress
As if her career had that kind of earning potential. Johnny only sued against the money he could prove he lost. She’s suing for something only she thinks she’s worth in her mind. The delusion.
She can quote statistical analysis on tweets but can’t confirm that “correlation does not prove causation”.
This is like a typical news anchor raving on statistics but doesn’t understand what they’re saying. And she’s an expert? 🤣🤡
The most shocking thing I heard in this trial: “A decline in AH’s career”
AH had a career???
She's damaged her own career, simple.
I love how he brought up the poop story because he's right, you can't directly correlate what did or did not destroy her career. Maybe people just started realizing she's a crappy actress.
A 'Crappy' person lmfao
💩
Before the trial I never knew who she was so idk if a crappie actress but a crappie person that she is
Time stamp?
@@raafatawar8005 14:57 is when he starts talking about it and the witness laughs.
This woman has been "working on" this case to the tune of $60,000, and the best answer she can come up with to questions about her findings is "I don't know." Wow.
That’s the issue with this country. A lot of people claim themselves as experts but know nothing about their job
Too true. I read once that in order for evil to prevail it only requires good men/women to remain silent. I probably haven't got it exactly but hope you get the gist
Give her a break...
Dennison asked her the very tough question of "Correlation itself does not imply Causation does it"....
Heards carreer took off after she married Johnny, her negitivity comes from her outrageous behavour and lies...
Very true. They need to put out what her worth and assets were prior to her even meeting Johnny. And what it was before the attorneys statements. That would be interesting.
Because he was helping her get parts.
and she ruin it, now ends ups on depp black list lol, im looking forward to see how amber career is like after this trial now
This lawyer has very good analytical skills. The witness does not have basis for her opinion.
Are you kidding me? Trees burn one at a time... bumble bumble....bumble bumble...circle with no meaning or ending, complete waste of time.
You don't need to have good analytical skills to understand the difference between causation and correlation, those are the absolute basics...
I lost it when he said "Is there a single one who has had any press suggesting that they defecated in the marital bed?" I fricking lost it!
“Miss Heard’s career”! After that phrase I could not stop laughing.
I love this lawyer, Wayne Dennison! He called this entertainment expert out for not knowing basic things about movies and actors she says she has analyzed, and been paid $60K and hasn't even met Heard. Dennison asked her if she knew who Patrick Wilson was, and she didn't know! If you're going to call yourself an expert and constantly repeat your 25 years of experience in entertainment, you should do your research! Patrick Wilson played a HUGE part in Aquaman! He was the ANTAGONIST, the VILLAIN (if you will) in Aquaman! This witness didn't even know about Heard's other film. 25 years of experience, and she is a so-called Expert Witness in this 2022 defamation case and she doesn't know popular movies or their lead actors! It's Wayne Dennison who brought that out. That's what a good lawyer does!
Bravo.
It was great when she started getting rattled. Her face tightened, she looked angry, she was avoidibg eye contact, started taking more swigs from her bottle.
@@wadewilson8011 😊
@@stompthedragon4010 I know, right?! I think that's how the lawyer, Dennison, made it happen. He took so much time, and he made her nervous and defensive. He did the same with the mental health expert (who was horrible). I wonder if that's Dennison's style. If it's a way of making these witnesses see the mistakes and contradictions in their testimonies and knowledge. I honestly think he's better than the other lawyers on the team, if I can compare. I mean, Vasquez is very reactive, I've noticed. She's quick, but could step up her game if she did more research and took the time to learn the lingo that is used and practiced in these witnesses' fields of profession. I mean, Dennison takes his time and is adorably (and perhaps deceptively bumbling in his speech, like Columbo, I'm tellin ya!), but he KNOWS what he's talking about. He surprises the witnesses with his knowledge. It's so entertaining!!!
I highly doubt the jury will recognise this though
Bruh, this woman is a wretch. I can’t believe she actually spoke to that lawyer like that and quite literally doesn’t even understand her own job? How does AH’s team continue to put people on the stand that make her look worse and worse?
Several of Amber's experts were just downright rude
They also get that crack man testified on court for them . 😂
@@4n4Queen 🤣
This woman was great, she kept coming back to the point even though he tried to derail her. She had clear, consise, fact based answers.
@@mmartin685 She Couldn’t Even Provide A Fact Based Answer Considering Two Simple Words Lol. Stop It
This woman is a joke. I can't believe the "experts" AH's legal team has used. She ruined her own career. Period.
I read period period period 😂
So by this woman's logic, wouldn't Amber ALSO be guilty of what she is accusing Johnny of, considering Mr. Depp has lost at least TWO roles in the wake of HER defamatory remarks about HIM in her Op-Ed and social media posts? He lost his role in Pirates 6 and in Fantastic Beasts 3, no? And have you considered that it is maybe HER lies and HER bad choices and behaviors that have caused her career to suffer....as in Aquaman 2?
I've never heard of Waldman or his statements until just now, but heard the recordings of Amber arguing with Johnny and stating that she did hit him. So in my case, and I feel like many others, it's her actions and the truth that's wrecking her career.
Same here.
Me too. I dislike her because of hearing her on the recordings and then not donating money
Same here!!!
Yup
Saaaame! Had no idea who this Waldman person is and still don’t lmao 🤣
This lady contradicted herself so much. Her bias and lack of credibility were obvious smh
Agree, but the next time there is a fire she should be hired as the expert witness!
Yeah and she gave me a headache 🤦♀️
Exactly. She's embarrassing. If I were her, I would have just got up and went home 🤣😂 She awful!
Lol ikr!
Wayne Dennison deserves a huge credit as well ✌️ Bravo to this intelligent lawyer.
Is it just me. Or does anyone else hate it when witnesses direct their answers to the jury, not the person they're talking to?
It seems so rude. And like they're trying to convince the jury of their lies
"correlation is not causation" - "I'm not an expert in semantics".
"Oranges and tangerines are not the same" - "I'm not an expert in fruitology"
He’s really good making it seem like he’s not going anywhere, then brings it full circle.
Style Columbo 👌 .
@@VIKTOR-ck3dx 🤩
Smiling …. Smiling …. Smiling…. “Amber Turd”…. Gets pissed😂😂😂😂😂 I love it
I am starting to think that AH has struggled to find experts willing to testify the way she wanted them to.
well you got there eventually, pat yourself on the back.
I agree,no smart person would so all the less professional were left...
Most have seen the writing on the wall and dont want to ruin their careers, these experts seem like they would do anything for a quick buck.
Who would want to be associated with her?? The only "experts" that would, are here and they are not the sharpest tools in the drawer...
Like common! They all need psychiatric help at some point, or a good cure...
Did you all see how Depp’s witness, Dr. Curry, eviscerated AH’s psychologist expert testimony?
it was her own voice recording that turned us against her
I know this is old but i come back from time to time...the facts that she think she's being cute smirking after making snarky comments makes her look childish not professijnal😂
I put some parts on to help me sleep sometimes lol
“She was in Aquaman, The Stand, and got contracts for Justice League and other notable films, then her career dried up after the Waldman statements.” Uhh, yeah, did you see the reviews, critiques, and audience responses of those movies? Everyone hated her performances-critics and the general population alike. No one connected to her. Her career dried up because people saw her acting badly and didn’t want to see her anymore. You say there’s a correlation between the Waldman statements and the reduction of contract offers, but neglect the correlation between audiences disliking an actor’s acting and studios not wanting to offer contracts to poorly received actors.
+she denies that bad press did affect Johnny when it comes to work
Didn't expect to hear "Amber turd" actually spoken in the courtroom. That's now immortalized in the court record.
💪💩
It was the high point of my day.
I nearly lost it when the lawyer said “Amber turd” and they showed Amber’s face right after. It has to be so embarrassing for her to know that’s going to be on record forever.
@@plvtoisaplanet LOL. Live by the Turd, die by the Turd.
love Dennison, he is stealthy..comes across disarming and soft..but he's extremely intelligent and sharp exposing lies
And knows which buttons to push.
Yes he does. He was so good, he had the “expert” flirting with him. “Ohhh you’re a movie fan” and she said a few other things as well. Talk about a smooooooth criminal lol
Well said.
This attorney is cute! He talks slowly & stammers unlike the other charismatic ones. But he seems knowledgeable and asks valid questions. Even says sorry for interrupting. Using it to raise voice and talk arrogantly dint really help any witness so far!
This lawyer is amazing. He is charming. Soft spoken.
I like his body language.
I swear all of AH's witnesses were coached to look at the jury when answering.
Ya think?
I totally agree!! I have never seen this before!!
These arrogant, narcissistic people on her team seem evil. She makes her point and smiles, like gotcha, when imo she comes off as a partisan liar.
Hm
Agree. The vibe of this lady is so off. Not coming across as credible at all . The smarmy smiling gotcha dupers delight is disturbing. Then she snaps back to I’m the expert Queen do not interrupt me. it annoyed me that he let her go on and on but the more she spoke the more she dug a hole. Well done mr Guy / lawyer !
I think this woman is great, she has fact based researched evidence. She's smart, well spoken, and doesn't take crap from the lawyer.
@m martin And doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation. Or she was pretending she didn't so she wouldn't have to answer any truth-revealing questions. Either way, she made herself look very poor as a so-called expert, and further damaged Amber's case -- if it's even possible to damage it more than it already is.
She said she’s not a fire fighter and won’t go there with him yet she sure knows a lot about how a fire starts and just keeps repeatedly referencing the “fire” as if it’s straight from a script. I just wish he ask her, Ma’am are you a firefighter? Lol🤗😆🚒
14:44 omg this question! 🤣🤣🤣 And where it goes...I can't.😂😂😂
Amber caused her own negativity by the recordings of her abusing her husband physically emotionally mentally and verbally she ruined her own career! This is a waste of time! Justice for Johnny❤️
You'd think that, but actually it's spreading the word about how narcissistic, manipulative, abusive and crazy she actually is, so it's not a total waste of time.
Did she have a career though? I didnt even know this terd before all of this.
I wouldn’t trust AH as far as I could throw her 😆
Evil witch
& I certainly wouldn’t trust her around a puppy never mind a baby
@@tehmineyalbuzdag2390 😂🤣😂 I know right !
@@jacklow9611 that’s true! I was meaning that her trying to blame Johnny for her losing roles etc was a waste of time cuz we all know it’s not true. Thanks for clarifying though 😊
The world heard the audio clip of her admitting to hitting him. She ruined her own career.
AH is feeling the effects of her own actions. She never thought that anyone would question her jumping on the "victim of domestic abuse" bandwagon...karma got her for being the domestic abuser after claiming victim. She is pure evil and is getting what she deserves.
This woman cannot tell that the loss of jobs for heard may have been caused by the discovery of how cruel Amber is. Her starting point is esoteric at best, and he talent is less than minimal
At the 13min mark she just admits then that having a negative story about you can damage your career......exactly what Johnny is suing Amber over
AH witnesses seem to help JD the most.
Right her claims are so contradictory. She asserts that Johnny's career hasn't been affected by negative press but then goes on and on about how Amber's career has been ruined by bad press. A logical person is able to deduce that its either one or the other, there were be consistency in cause and effect regardless of the individual
I love this lawyer.He is hilarious. That witness thinks her answers are on point Check out her rickety smile after she answers the lawyer's questions. Girl please...
Think I recall JD doing the smile / smirk loads when he was on the stand.
So when’s this Docu-Series going to Air 😂 I’m tired of scrambling on CZcams trying to stay caught up
Man, it pains me that he didn’t say “We also don’t have any photo or video proof that Johnny Depp physically abused Amber either, now do we?” when she said her rebuttal to the defecating statement!
So then by this womans exact logic, and her wording that she agreed to, EVERYTHING after amber posted the first moment of Johnny being abusive and everything else is a direct link to him losing millions of dollars worth of deals, and the halt of his career. Which clearly means that amber is guilty of defamation of character and slander, as well as purgury under oath.
That she dissagrees on ,it only works if it is Amber. Apperantly she thinks Johnny is just doing fine and didnt lose anything.
Unfortunately no. The argument isn't that it impacted him negatively, it's whether or not her statements were true. Libel is tricky, the core of it isn't the damage it's the truth of it. (Obviously it's more nuanced though)
@@AB-ty7kh thanks for the clarification
While I agree there’s some major leaps in your logic. Everything really boils down to he said she said in this case, and unfortunately the jurors aren’t aware of the full scope of evidence we are seeing and which has led to an avalanche of support for Depp on social media. That being said Dennison is an excellent attorney and picks this woman’s testimony to shreds. But as to the foundation of the case that really is going to depend on what the jury is seeing and how they interpret it. Could still go either way.
I agree 💯% …
The difference is that the Waldman statements were true unlike the statements that AH stated about JD, so she's using her lawyers to twist and gaslight all over this case just like she does with everything else. I'm glad his lawyer pointed out that it's 'not defamation if it's true'.
👏👏👏
Say it again for the ppl in the back 👏
Like always the stir is all over ambers lies
👍.
Yessssssssss. I've been saying this from the beginning. She brought it on herself!
"talking both about Mr. Depp's damages and about miss heard's purported damages..." lol love it!!
1:36 "I'm not an expert in semantics."
But the fact that correlation does not equal causation is something even 16-year olds learn in Statistics class. (At least in the UK.) Plus, it should be a pretty intuitive concept.
If social media statements damaged Amber's career then the same can be made about her statements that showed up on social media about Johnny.
But her damage is worse. Right?!
@@wendyhardin5259 how come?
Amber is the cause of her own negative effects, and she is the cause of people viewing Johnny in a negative light as well. She IS the match, not the Waldman Report. She and her lies are the match that started to burn the forest if this so-called expert wants to use that analogy.
@@wendyhardin5259 yes it is worse because of her evil motives and her lies came back to haunt her... whenever you are digging a hole for someone dig one for yourself because the circumstances can backfire especially if the person is telling lies.
Maybe the so called expert can explain the difference between assumptions in predicting losing a million dollars on AQUAMANN and 22 million dollars on pirates of the Caribbean. And how much the next role would bring a real actor, with proven statistics, to better project Johnny Depp's losses directly due to amber herself.
ah, the waldman statement was the spark that caused amber to poop on the bed. these experts are awesome. but seriously, Wayne is so witty against these expert witnesses. i've been most impressed with Wayne so far even though Camille did a savage job against Amber. But Wayne is just dissecting the experts' research and he's also witty, sarcastic, and ironic in dismantling them.
Wayne is awesome, he can break experts. Camille is just ruthless! She's worse than a rottweiller. Haha
Yeah he's the truth.
Yeah he's got a different swag, Camille like Tiger style Wayne's like praying mantis or someshit
@@liamwilkins1332 FUNNY MADE ME LAFF THANKS...
@@liamwilkins1332 👌🏼😅😅😅
Wow her whole demeanor changed as soon as he started questioning her you can visually see her get defensive
“If one believed it” lol got her
This lawyer was really brillant. Most calm towards the Witness but really confusing her. At the end she was completely Lost!!!
Correct
and he wasnt even objected once, hes a pro
Not sure that was a strategy. He stumbles alot on his words and is constantly shaking/trembling. He looks like he has a medical condition.
This is the only witness of Turds that I've actually felt bad for, she should have been hired by Johnny. She's actually very good. One of his tactics is to try to interrupt her, she stands her ground and doesn't let him disrespect her. She's trying to do her job.
Right. You can' t just exclude negative press about tge dog poop just because it is advantageous to Amner' s case, and it didnt come from Waldman
you know they insincere when they only look at the jury and don't respond directly to the lawyer....tea....
Actually you need to convince the jury not the opposing lawyer,so its kinda common
They’re actually supposed to look at the jury when answering a question, court protocol or something. But I agree, this is tea and they’re guilty in my opinion 🙊
@@sabrinaoviedo6124 depp hardly ever even looked at the jury, I doubt there's a rule about that. It's true , it's an act
It comes off as scripted.
People need to get a clue. Attorneys always ask the people testifying to look at the jury. The questions are being asked for the jury!
Anyone has the right to defend yourself from true or false accusations. Her career never flew because she can’t be nice and connect long term with people. It’s 100% clear. It’s just a beautiful face (after plastic surgery), with a dark soul.
Keep in mind
This woman is sapose to be an unbiased "expert".. yet look at how hard she is pushing for Amber Heard
Lady at 1:14, I'd kiss her feet
If you trash someone publicly and then people find out you’re lying, people who defend themselves it can hardly be defamation.
BINGO!
Let's first say nobody gives a 💩 about that movie Pirates of the Caribbean if Johnny as Captain Jack Sparrow won't be in it 100%
The movie is mostly him and his character!..... and this is why the movie is on hold for now!!
Yes! Can't be a movie without him
I literally couldn't name another one of the characters in those films. Every American I know knows the name "jack sparrow". Johnny Depp IS POTC
@@justincastellanos5647 I still remember Calypso lol
Johnny Depp is the only reason I watched all 5 Pirates of the Caribbean lol
Yeah this lady full of it he is the main character and to say he would not have been in 6 she's full of it without him there is no 6 it wouldn't even look right to put another in his place but you know some must find things out the hard way now don't they.
This Witness handled the soft ball questions very well, indeed. However under cross examination, she got her rear-end handed to her. Why someone (A so-called Expert) would risk being in the spotlight (To get future $$$), but be publicly interrogated by Johnny's very capable team, without being "fully prepared" and coached is beyond me? ... Did she actually think this would be a walk in the park? This could very well effect their own business in adverse way. DUMB DUMB DUMB!
And Dumber…
@@jamesaubrey2793 indeed
I love this lawyer. He sounds like Lewis Black when he starts getting excited. Lol
An expert witness who doesn't know the difference between causation and correlation. Ugh.
The idea of a expert social media analyst is utter nonsense anyway
Yeah, that made my face contort a bit. As my parents' generation would say, "Yikes!"
Yeah I'm confused by the start where she seems to say that she considered anything after the statements and anything caused by the statements to be the same thing.
She is trying to be so smug and he's destroying her in the process. It's awesome. Also, isn't it hearsay if all of her info came from a convo with someone else that they can't prove?
Not for an expert witness actually. Hearsay doesn't have the same rules for expert witnesses as it does for the normal witnesses
I watched the whole cross examination, she was definitely having a field day feeling smug and dare I say even sneering at him, he kept his cool though and towards the end if you observe closely she became more serious, because he was going in with those questions..lol
@@iiAIDANii1 Aaaaaah ok, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification and for doing it with class :) Most people on social media only attack people that ask questions
@@J-Tex-Corporation lol ikr, that never made sense to me
Yes. But he doesn’t care as the lawyer knows he can use that in his favor. They only call objection if it’s on their favor.
The way this "expert" is touching her face and hair appearing fidgety is a classic sign that she is not being truthful. It is like she has to think of what lie she has to come up with fast as directed by Amber Heard's team.
“Ms Tur.. Ms Heard” BRILLIANT
I never knew Waldman existed in years of following this trial. I even believed Amber at first until i heard the recordings and started educating myself on the facts! If Amber wants to sue someone over her bad reputation she can only sue herself....🤷
The audio was allegedly leaked by Mr. Waldman ,and now the world can say that Amber was a hoax and a liar..She ruined and damaged herself...
Same
Me either. If that is all they have to argue with and if that’s why they’re suing DEPP, then they’re dead in the water.
Same
Me too! I didn't know about Waldman and I've been a JD supporter since she first made these accusations!
She demands to be trusted on her word whatsoever.
What type of expertise did she provide, but rumors? Her statements are based on personal level projections, not backed by any type of research methodology which would define scope of her comparative narrative.
She can claim anything, in that way.
Also known as subjective analogy.
This case has so far been nothing but hype and subjective assertions presented as fact. There is nothing quantitative or objective from AH's side particularly. Haven't seen many JD witnesses.
All the people I've seen in court are parasites.
Does she not think that screwed herself in her career. You bad mouth someone who is more famous than you, of course his fans will back him and tell producers hire her and we will boycott your movie. How is that Johnny's fault.
Yeah. I get this strange astrology-vibe from her reasoning. The voodoo on this one is strong.
Yes. I hope the jury see it this way
Shady camera man focusing on her face when the hash tags were read 😂 😂 😂 lol😅
"If they're true they're not defamatory"
"Sorry I have no idea wtf this trial is about"
I don't get it. So she makes up the very worst lies possible and everyone find them ridiculous and she wants to sue the person she was lying about just because she failed to deliver a credible set of lies even when all society was In the perfect mindset to believe her kind of case?
He is suing her.
How do you know all of this? Do you take time out to eat?
@@binab4784 and she is countersuing
Yeah and she does all this to cover up her physically abusing Depp, that's the root of this
Exactly that!
Love how patient this lawyer is! He’s getting that people nervous. 🙌🏻🙌🏻
16:18 was the nail in the coffin and he reeled her in perfectly with that snare. He said “you can't do it?” she said “no.” then he said “then you can do it with Waldman can you?” completely discredited her as an “expert” she said herself she can't do it.
No wonder why she wants to approach the bench their witness is making team Amber Turd look pathetic... LOL!
Wait - is she allowed to say "excuse me, please!!" to the lawyer questioning her??
Kinda. She can say it but he can basically make her stop talking by continuing and if she doesn't the judge will make her. But my personal belief, he lets her act that way. He wants Ambers defense to think they are in charge so they get these big egos which helps him in the end.
She says she's not an expert on causation and correlation? Does she not know her job?!
And she calls them semantics not a very bright person !!
I’m sure her full time job😉 she might be an expert.
She's an absolute fool
Right. That's literally what she was hired for
Glorified daddy's girl who got her job because of silicon Valley and connections. She's reminds me of a local dollar general clerk, but in better clothes 🤣
This trial has been a movie since day one. It is amusing to see Amber's lawyers finally pull out their 'last resort' because all else seems to have failed. I am no legal expert but I love movies and whenever Amber's team takes the stand, I am reminded of legal comedies.😅
She mentions correlation at about 1:21, but when Johnny's lawyer reminds her that "correlation does not imply causation" she replies, "I'm not an expert in semantics."
Then, at around 3:05 she wants to rely on "statistical … analysis." The statement "Correlation does not imply causation." should be familiar to any high school student who's ever been taught any elementary statistics.
And she calls herself an expert.
Anyone that doesn’t have the mental capacity to understand that correlation and causation are not necessarily codependent shouldn’t be testifying as an expert.
This lawyer was incredible… this women is pissed because he schooled her !
The lawyer is very disarming. When he starts talking, what comes out of his mouth is so surprising.
JD's got a solid team there! Every one of them are killing it! Good job team Johnny 👏
"Its just dust, I'm distracting myself"...........TRAGIC.