I wonder if Dave might be misunderstanding British style of interviewing. As a British person I don’t really see Krishnan (the interviewer) as someone who has any opinion or vendetta against Quentin. I just see him as someone who is asking the questions. The role of the interviewer in the UK is that they ask the questions that people want to hear. The problem is that Quentin is taking it personally. As a British viewer I can see that Krishnan is just playing devils advocate. In the UK it’s the interviewers job to ask difficult questions. It’s this impartial ability to ask difficult questions that makes media more fair. It might feel unfair for Quentin fans, but Krishnan is equally as unflinching with anyone else he interviews. There are lots of problems with the British media but I think this ability to debate topics without taking a personal (subjective!!!) view is a merit of British journalism.
It's not a difficult question. It's a dumb one he's already been asked before... it's low hanging fruit. Who wants to know that? Probably not people who actually watch his movies, so why would they watch him on tv? Why do we care about their questions? This it just a silly explanation. If if someone asked me that question, I'd think they were a simpleton lol, not someone who asked a tough question.
@@srose1088 "Well, allow me to retort." ~Jewels QT says: "I have a *responsibility* to talk about slavery...." But wait... He doesn't have a responsibility to talk about violence? 😵💫🤯🤦🏽😂🤣 When this same interviewer exhibited the same style with RDJ, RDJ & all the YT comment sections acted like NPR's Terry Gross didn't ask RDJ the same questions (circa 2010/12), and as though RDJ didn't happily oblige (NPR's Terry Gross). The intent of the interviewers was to show the world the Actors & Directors Authentic Connection to their Character/Script(s). With this interviewer, they both failed... In tragicomically awesome fashion. We don't see/feel/think the onus of that latter fact is on the interviewer(s). I hypothesize the interviewed isn't/aren't being Authentic, and that is why they are being demonstrably defensive in their overcompensatory articulation(💰). 🤔 As the old adage goes: "If you can't stand the heat... Why TF are you a Chef?" 🤣
@Doctor_Squidward_Burr_Earp I don't know these npr comparisons you're talking about, so I'm not sure what the point is... I never said Tarantino wasn't an ass hole lol he probably is, but the interviewer isn't going to learn anything new with the way he was talking, and he just sounds stupid to me. If you think being blunt and stupid is tough, then I guess he does ask the tough questions 🤷🏽♀️. lol It doesn't affect my life either way (or intest me), so I honestly don't care enough to look up these other things and people you're talking about. Sry, maybe I'll get it one day.
@x21212 The savor function is the top function though. I know about the whole jumper thing in OP, I've been thinking you ment Fe in place of Ne because Ne is the savor function. I think I know what you meant to say now.
I never understood the appeal of his movies. They seem at least decent, but I didn't understand why people liked them so much and acted like they were masterpieces.
ENTP man here with Masculine "Ne, Ti" and Feminine "Fe, Si". All I can say that this guy is obnoxious. Yes it's okay to disagree and be the an asshole. Yes, it's important to know between the link between fiction and real life, but if it makes you uncomfortable it's best to be honest and upfront about it, such as saying: "I need more reflection and solid connections that supports and justifies this idea of enjoying fictional violent movies/films." Don't be an asshole that everyone hates, be the one that everyone likes, if not mostly like.
ENTP double masculine here of Ne and Ti just like you and I think this guys is quite soft, I'm an Artist and I also have violent rage that I channel through my Art. and this interaction is real the bread and butters of an ENTP, this is a norm, a base line of the basic ENTP, you know. if you don't regognize yourself in this are you sure you're an ENTP ? no offense Bro, just worried you're mystiped (PS: Pardon my French, I'm not a native speaker)
Could you make a video about Ben Shapiro and the ,what i would call, the woman version of him, meaning Brett Cooper. Although, she maybe does not have the same ideology as him(but she is still conservative), the resemblance in words per seconds and also face structure is outstanding, but maybe it is just me...Either way it could be interesting for you to find how the men faces translate to women faces and the personalities are still around there.
lol... All Quintin had to say is "I don't need to prove to you that violent movies and real world violence aren't linked. You need to give me scientific evidence that they are. Evidence that does not exist, by the way." These are the same bullshit accusations that were used against rock music and videogames. It's not a hard thing to rebut at all.
I haven't taken the time to email you guys, but i wanted to say that it was disappointing to not have any new content on your website last Thursday. It feels a little bit of a rip off considering the price and extra money spent to transfer to the new site for the Livestream. It would have been nice to at least get a heads up about that. Thank you for hearing me out.
If I remember correctly, Shan mentioned somewhere during her live show that she will be posting the live show videos the following Thursdays for all the people who weren't able to make it live.
@@zenex133 Thank you, I must have missed that part. Still leaves a little bit of a sour taste in my mouth since they already decreased the amount of videos they were making per week already. I almost feel like it might be a good idea to decrease the monthly payment and increase the typing payment or something.
@@shindig9000 yah, from what I'm picking up, it does seems that they're slowly shifting their focus on providing more value through their typing service and more client based work which makes sense.
I think i have feminen fe and i got it last but i do have fantsys about being a evil crime boss that takes over the world i think its my ne i got it seconde is that mean my ti is feminien too becuse im open to beliving in god and trusting that he is here to protact me and mybe hurt me for his enjoyment im an intp please help agian i feel like my ti is feminen and i got a 100 precent on my introversion i have only 1friend whos in a mental hospitole if it helps to understand the station (any way soory for bad english not an american or an english man or an australien )
I think that Tarantino is ESTJ. His movies are about Fi - act selfish without considering others and you will be punished for it. For example, in Django unchained, dr. Schulz gets killed, because of his pride, even though Django was dependent on him being reasonable. And Schultz, as Te-Fi person, immediately after killing Candy apologized to Django before being shot. And all this after the whole movie acting morally correct. In this interview, he talks about Te - his role as a filmmaker. What others can and cannot demand from him. And he talks about the intention of interviewer for asking this question - that is all part of information that Te collects. Reasons why people do stuff The interviewer is INTP or ENTP - asking question that he already knows answer to, because it comforts Fe viewers that it is OK to enjoy violent movies.
And ornithologists observing hawks catch their prey are also prone to violence, right? What about people watching shark-week, or dramas? Quentin is not a shrink or professor, he isn't qualified to answer. He just enjoys something about violence and so do the audience. Why should he be held accountable for the actions of violent people?
Your analogy is off. Quentin would be the ornithologist setting up the scene where the Hawk catches its prey, much like Disney used to do in the old animal kingdom specials. He's not just observing something randomly. He is provoking the situation. He's making sure that the hawk meets its prey to give us a good show. Thus, asking him about taking responsibility for that is fair game.
@@carlttoon It really isn't, no-one can answer the question. There's no proof, it¨s a matter of whether you trust there is something of value to people producing things they like, or whether you're a dead-serious, fearful bore. Is children play-fighting wrong as well? Many would think so because they have got their ideas and morals about things, but the animal inside has gotta learn how to fight. That's nature. People watching entertainment on a screen likely aren't the most dangerous people around. Duh.
@@oscarl.3563 that's not what I wrote above. You are twisting my words. Quentin is directly responsible for any violent contents he puts out there. One cannot absolve onself of such responsability, as he and now you, are trying to do. He chose to create violent contents and how he represented itinhis stories. That is why he is famous. He can't just take the credits when it affords him an oscar, but deny any responsability for any negative consequence. This is, philosohically, going on a hermeneutic slippery slope.
@@carlttoon How is it irresponsible, do you have concrete proof it's bad? No-one does. I could say it's irresponsible to practice capoeira on the streets as you could kill someone, how about driving a car? Now that's irresponsible, we all know it mows, crushes or burn people to death _sometimes._ Yet people speed down roads because they enjoy it. Don't be a killjoy, if these movies ain't for you I hear there's a new Barbie on-the-way. Only if you could prove it doesn't induce brain-rot and unfortunately it seems the brain goes to sleep before the telly(though incidentally I imagine a violent horror-story might keep someone on their toes.)
@@oscarl.3563 you don't understand. It's not about proofs. There is nothing to prove. If Tarantino is happy when people celebrate the genius of his films, then, he cannot pick and choose when people criticize him and hold him responsible for the violence he willingly displays. Both come together, the good and the bad. Finally, what I think of his films has nothing to do with this discussion.
It's obvious that his films added violence to the world. Every second street argument now has the word "Motherf..." and that's in Australia where the word never even existed before 1995. Also, he ignored Uma Thurman's fears and pushed her into a car crash scene that hurt her back. Unless he is asked about it specifically, he never brings it up, even when it would be appropriate to the topic of the conversation. Masculine aggression gets things done, but it can look very unconscious and self-serving.
Makes me wonder what James Cameron's type is because he seems rly self-serving for his movies. Keeping cast and crew trapped in the water for titanic so long, everyone just had to piss in the water and swim in each other's pee... stuff like that.
He made two masterpieces and then coasted on the coattails of them through solid decent movies. The fact you haven’t seen Pulp Fiction, a 90s masterpiece is just ridiculous.
I heard he makes *really good coffee.* _____ If I understand your description of Masculine Fe here... "I don't wanna fight with you. *But it's SOFA~KING irresistibly AWESOME sauce...* Oh, and I *WILL* have the last word, my 'friend.'" 🤣🤣🤣 PS Wait. He has a responsibility to talk about slavery... But not violence. Bruh. wat. da. phuuuuhq!?? 🤔😵💫😂 He got legit checkmated and they both *know* it. 🤣🤣🤣 This: 💰🤑 is what QT wants to talk about. 🥸🤮
oh hey it's the foot guy
I normally watch videos at 2x speed
Can't do that with this guy
That meme of him walking around thinking on set and just scowling is SO relatable to me as an ENTP.
He looks a lot like the lead play ENFPs as well, Robin Williams and that Westworld writer.
God now I can't unsee it. When Quentin talks, he moves exactly the same way Neil Tyson does. The way they move their heads and mimic expressions. Damn
I wonder if Dave might be misunderstanding British style of interviewing. As a British person I don’t really see Krishnan (the interviewer) as someone who has any opinion or vendetta against Quentin. I just see him as someone who is asking the questions. The role of the interviewer in the UK is that they ask the questions that people want to hear. The problem is that Quentin is taking it personally. As a British viewer I can see that Krishnan is just playing devils advocate. In the UK it’s the interviewers job to ask difficult questions. It’s this impartial ability to ask difficult questions that makes media more fair. It might feel unfair for Quentin fans, but Krishnan is equally as unflinching with anyone else he interviews. There are lots of problems with the British media but I think this ability to debate topics without taking a personal (subjective!!!) view is a merit of British journalism.
I get your point but Krishnan is still an as*hole lol
It's not a difficult question. It's a dumb one he's already been asked before... it's low hanging fruit. Who wants to know that? Probably not people who actually watch his movies, so why would they watch him on tv? Why do we care about their questions? This it just a silly explanation. If if someone asked me that question, I'd think they were a simpleton lol, not someone who asked a tough question.
I "wonder" that, as well.
(🎯 😉)
@@srose1088
"Well, allow me to retort." ~Jewels
QT says:
"I have a *responsibility* to talk about slavery...."
But wait...
He doesn't have a responsibility to talk about violence?
😵💫🤯🤦🏽😂🤣
When this same interviewer exhibited the same style with RDJ, RDJ & all the YT comment sections acted like NPR's Terry Gross didn't ask RDJ the same questions (circa 2010/12), and as though RDJ didn't happily oblige (NPR's Terry Gross).
The intent of the interviewers was to show the world the Actors & Directors Authentic Connection to their Character/Script(s).
With this interviewer, they both failed...
In tragicomically awesome fashion.
We don't see/feel/think the onus of that latter fact is on the interviewer(s).
I hypothesize the interviewed isn't/aren't being Authentic, and that is why they are being demonstrably defensive in their overcompensatory articulation(💰).
🤔
As the old adage goes:
"If you can't stand the heat...
Why TF are you a Chef?"
🤣
@Doctor_Squidward_Burr_Earp I don't know these npr comparisons you're talking about, so I'm not sure what the point is... I never said Tarantino wasn't an ass hole lol he probably is, but the interviewer isn't going to learn anything new with the way he was talking, and he just sounds stupid to me. If you think being blunt and stupid is tough, then I guess he does ask the tough questions 🤷🏽♀️. lol It doesn't affect my life either way (or intest me), so I honestly don't care enough to look up these other things and people you're talking about. Sry, maybe I'll get it one day.
he is crazy indeed
4:15 "you have two masculines that are just banging each other" you're making me blush
Please could we look at an ENTP female sometime? Or at least not another old white guy? (other than Tyson)
@x21212 ENTPs dont have savior Fe, so are you implying that they don't talk about Fe types enough? I'm confused.
@x21212 The savor function is the top function though. I know about the whole jumper thing in OP, I've been thinking you ment Fe in place of Ne because Ne is the savor function. I think I know what you meant to say now.
Guys, it’s 2023. The 10th (and probably final) Tarantino-Movie should be released!
I never understood the appeal of his movies. They seem at least decent, but I didn't understand why people liked them so much and acted like they were masterpieces.
Because they're like live action comics.
… new logo… finally!
ENTP man here with Masculine "Ne, Ti" and Feminine "Fe, Si".
All I can say that this guy is obnoxious.
Yes it's okay to disagree and be the an asshole. Yes, it's important to know between the link between fiction and real life, but if it makes you uncomfortable it's best to be honest and upfront about it, such as saying:
"I need more reflection and solid connections that supports and justifies this idea of enjoying fictional violent movies/films."
Don't be an asshole that everyone hates, be the one that everyone likes, if not mostly like.
ENTP double masculine here of Ne and Ti just like you and I think this guys is quite soft, I'm an Artist and I also have violent rage that I channel through my Art.
and this interaction is real the bread and butters of an ENTP, this is a norm, a base line of the basic ENTP, you know.
if you don't regognize yourself in this are you sure you're an ENTP ?
no offense Bro, just worried you're mystiped
(PS: Pardon my French, I'm not a native speaker)
Ah the ENTP speed talking lol
Interviewer is ENTP critic.
They talked very fast. Holy smokes.
They always speed up their clips beforehand, so they aren't literally talking that fast. I think ppl talk fast when they fight too.
Could you make a video about Ben Shapiro and the ,what i would call, the woman version of him, meaning Brett Cooper. Although, she maybe does not have the same ideology as him(but she is still conservative), the resemblance in words per seconds and also face structure is outstanding, but maybe it is just me...Either way it could be interesting for you to find how the men faces translate to women faces and the personalities are still around there.
Yeah
muh mans a more geeky quagmire
lol... All Quintin had to say is "I don't need to prove to you that violent movies and real world violence aren't linked. You need to give me scientific evidence that they are. Evidence that does not exist, by the way." These are the same bullshit accusations that were used against rock music and videogames. It's not a hard thing to rebut at all.
Hmm…it’s almost like he isn’t Ne-Ti 😏
Ive always thought his movies were overrated but damn, hes the type of person i would never be able to relax around
Stephen Fry has self-directed violence and he's social type 4.. Quentin Tarantino having movie-directed violence, what social type would he be?
Probably no.3
What are you talking about, enigram types?
@@srose1088 Social Types, it's another layer to OPS that was released a few months ago
I haven't taken the time to email you guys, but i wanted to say that it was disappointing to not have any new content on your website last Thursday.
It feels a little bit of a rip off considering the price and extra money spent to transfer to the new site for the Livestream.
It would have been nice to at least get a heads up about that.
Thank you for hearing me out.
If I remember correctly, Shan mentioned somewhere during her live show that she will be posting the live show videos the following Thursdays for all the people who weren't able to make it live.
@@zenex133
Thank you, I must have missed that part.
Still leaves a little bit of a sour taste in my mouth since they already decreased the amount of videos they were making per week already.
I almost feel like it might be a good idea to decrease the monthly payment and increase the typing payment or something.
@@shindig9000 yah, from what I'm picking up, it does seems that they're slowly shifting their focus on providing more value through their typing service and more client based work which makes sense.
I thought Stephen Fry had an Fi smirk
Ni is Quinton with his own plans, not options for the tribe.
I think i have feminen fe and i got it last but i do have fantsys about being a evil crime boss that takes over the world i think its my ne i got it seconde is that mean my ti is feminien too becuse im open to beliving in god and trusting that he is here to protact me and mybe hurt me for his enjoyment im an intp please help agian i feel like my ti is feminen and i got a 100 precent on my introversion i have only 1friend whos in a mental hospitole if it helps to understand the station (any way soory for bad english not an american or an english man or an australien )
I think i has masculine Fe cause the whole time I watched this I was like "felt"
Ive been here before myself. Lol im an asshole.
I think that Tarantino is ESTJ. His movies are about Fi - act selfish without considering others and you will be punished for it. For example, in Django unchained, dr. Schulz gets killed, because of his pride, even though Django was dependent on him being reasonable. And Schultz, as Te-Fi person, immediately after killing Candy apologized to Django before being shot. And all this after the whole movie acting morally correct.
In this interview, he talks about Te - his role as a filmmaker. What others can and cannot demand from him. And he talks about the intention of interviewer for asking this question - that is all part of information that Te collects. Reasons why people do stuff
The interviewer is INTP or ENTP - asking question that he already knows answer to, because it comforts Fe viewers that it is OK to enjoy violent movies.
Explain you art and it's impact on society.
No.
Why is he double-masculine but his top two functions are listed as feminine in the chart?
the masculine/feminine when referring to a persons type describe the sensory observer and the De wherever they are in a chart.
@@bigfckindeal293 thanks!
And ornithologists observing hawks catch their prey are also prone to violence, right? What about people watching shark-week, or dramas?
Quentin is not a shrink or professor, he isn't qualified to answer. He just enjoys something about violence and so do the audience. Why should he be held accountable for the actions of violent people?
Your analogy is off. Quentin would be the ornithologist setting up the scene where the Hawk catches its prey, much like Disney used to do in the old animal kingdom specials. He's not just observing something randomly. He is provoking the situation. He's making sure that the hawk meets its prey to give us a good show. Thus, asking him about taking responsibility for that is fair game.
@@carlttoon It really isn't, no-one can answer the question. There's no proof, it¨s a matter of whether you trust there is something of value to people producing things they like, or whether you're a dead-serious, fearful bore.
Is children play-fighting wrong as well? Many would think so because they have got their ideas and morals about things, but the animal inside has gotta learn how to fight. That's nature.
People watching entertainment on a screen likely aren't the most dangerous people around. Duh.
@@oscarl.3563 that's not what I wrote above. You are twisting my words. Quentin is directly responsible for any violent contents he puts out there. One cannot absolve onself of such responsability, as he and now you, are trying to do. He chose to create violent contents and how he represented itinhis stories. That is why he is famous. He can't just take the credits when it affords him an oscar, but deny any responsability for any negative consequence. This is, philosohically, going on a hermeneutic slippery slope.
@@carlttoon How is it irresponsible, do you have concrete proof it's bad? No-one does. I could say it's irresponsible to practice capoeira on the streets as you could kill someone, how about driving a car? Now that's irresponsible, we all know it mows, crushes or burn people to death _sometimes._ Yet people speed down roads because they enjoy it.
Don't be a killjoy, if these movies ain't for you I hear there's a new Barbie on-the-way. Only if you could prove it doesn't induce brain-rot and unfortunately it seems the brain goes to sleep before the telly(though incidentally I imagine a violent horror-story might keep someone on their toes.)
@@oscarl.3563 you don't understand. It's not about proofs. There is nothing to prove. If Tarantino is happy when people celebrate the genius of his films, then, he cannot pick and choose when people criticize him and hold him responsible for the violence he willingly displays. Both come together, the good and the bad. Finally, what I think of his films has nothing to do with this discussion.
It's obvious that his films added violence to the world. Every second street argument now has the word "Motherf..." and that's in Australia where the word never even existed before 1995. Also, he ignored Uma Thurman's fears and pushed her into a car crash scene that hurt her back. Unless he is asked about it specifically, he never brings it up, even when it would be appropriate to the topic of the conversation. Masculine aggression gets things done, but it can look very unconscious and self-serving.
Makes me wonder what James Cameron's type is because he seems rly self-serving for his movies. Keeping cast and crew trapped in the water for titanic so long, everyone just had to piss in the water and swim in each other's pee... stuff like that.
You guys are way too cool for school 😂. Meh… I don’t like it…. Everyone is stupid meh…
He made two masterpieces and then coasted on the coattails of them through solid decent movies.
The fact you haven’t seen Pulp Fiction, a 90s masterpiece is just ridiculous.
It's a bit dated now.
@@martingifford5415 Go on…
Pulp fiction is kind of overrated
@@filipposa212 that’s like saying nevermind by nirvana is overrated.
His movies are very physical. Se, not Ne. CS Joseph is ENTP.
ENTPs ask inconvenient questions. He is Fi - insisting on his values. Do not type by appearance. You have abandoned human needs. ESFP.
Are you saying that Quentin is Fi? I thought he might be Fi because he is always going on about his personal likes and dislikes.
@@martingifford5415 and values. He does outrageous things to make people think
I heard he makes *really good coffee.*
_____
If I understand your description of Masculine Fe here...
"I don't wanna fight with you.
*But it's SOFA~KING irresistibly AWESOME sauce...*
Oh, and I *WILL* have the last word, my 'friend.'"
🤣🤣🤣
PS
Wait.
He has a responsibility to talk about slavery...
But not violence.
Bruh.
wat.
da.
phuuuuhq!??
🤔😵💫😂
He got legit checkmated and they both *know* it.
🤣🤣🤣
This: 💰🤑
is what QT wants to talk about.
🥸🤮