Video

Sounds like henotheism (the title)

You just embarrassed yourself in this video. Nowhere in the gospel did it say to kill Christian apostate. Do a proper research before make a video. Even the Jews they don’t kill their apostate anymore.

With all due respect sir, "it doesn't sound right to me" is not an argument. It sounds like you started with the premise of "it doesn't sound right to me" and did mental gymnastics to arrive at the points that you brought up. Can you name one pre-modern Islamic scholar that had this view? There are clear-cut verses in the quran that contradict the points you have made in this video. Let's be careful about the things we say about Islam as it's very easy to fall into error. I appreciate your creativity in trying to produce new thought, but I suggest you consult people of knowledge before spreading views on a platform like this. May Allah forgive our shortcomings. Barakallahu feek.

I'm sorry but you are completely wrong. Who are we to change Islamic law? Islam was always a well-established way of life under the Quran and Sunnah. Why accommodate Islam to Western philosophy based on unfounded emotions? Apostasy manifests itself in 3 ways. 1. In belief. For example, considering lawful what Allah has explicitly prohibited. This is where your rejection of the application of hudud to an apostate comes in. 2. In the word. Insulting Allah, His Messenger, the holy books... 3. In the work. Actions and beliefs contrary to Islam like helping unbelievers, etc. Apostasy is punished if the person does not repent. In case of repentance, he is forgiven as Allah is the Most Merciful and his religion teaches forgiveness. Narrated 'Aisha: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "If somebody innovates something which is not in harmony with the principles of our religion, that thing is rejected." [Sahih Bukhari 2697] Now, the question is... Why are you innovating something that was never taught by the Prophet ﷺ nor his Companions? I will stop following this channel. May Allah guide you.

Show us in the Bible where it's said in the Christian scriptures please.

💗💗💗John 3:16💗💗💗

i feel the same too, i feel that putting someone to death for changing their belief is a little too much, especially if they are not a threat. Like, the apostates still abide by the islamic law when they are outside and dont start insulting the prophet(pbuh) or Allah, then do your thing, pay your Jiziya and be you but confined within the Islamic ruling, just as i am confined within the liberal ruling. On the other hand, as far as i know, its not Quranic material to determine the consequence of an apostate, so i think, expelling them from a country/city is an option or turn them into a refugee and have a liberal state adopt their own babies. I heard once, can't back it but it makes sense that this harsh punishment of putting an apostate to death was during troubling times in the early days of Islam. For example, people would 'revert' to islam, get hidden information and hand it over to the pagans during war. Therefore, reversion was taking seriously at that time because of conflict....I mean, that's reasonable to me, you cant have spies wandering around your community at the time of war. Dont get me wrong, death is still an option but i feel it doesnt have to be the first choice, but you have a point too...these reverts that come into Islam from other religions should be out to death too, and if that happened would there be any muslims, or there would be a big war taking place 🤷🏾‍♂

The 2 have literally nothing to do with each other. I am an Atheist and a Humanist. I strive to make the world a better place for all our children.

So Seriously. Not Kidding. Why should I believe your fairy tale story over observable Reality?

"Asking Dajjal to refute Tawheed "

Note: If you say that Dua is to ask not just anyone for something, but God/gods, or deity/deities, or asking as someone would ask God or a deity, then most people you charge with shirk do not do that, nor believe that, now, except you rephrase your argument as any asking whatsoever, which is why I asked such questions from ChatGPT.

nice video akhi

Wang Daiyu, also known as Zhenhui Laoren (“the true old man of Islam” 真回老人), lived approximately between 1580 and 1660 AD. He is the first Chinese Hui Muslim scholar to discuss Islamic philosophy systematically and put it into publication. Zhengjiao Zhenquan is a book that introduces Islamic doctrines; it is divided into two volumes, with a total of ten chapters. In this book, Wang Daiyu emphasizes that the oneness of “the true One” is “the separate and different oneness” (单另之一). He clearly states that the true One is “not the one of many”; rather, “the true One is the master of the one of many.” He says: It must be known that the true One is the separate and different One; it is not the one of many. The one of many is not the unique One. It is said that “from taiji (the supreme ultimate 太极) originate the two polarities (liangyi 两仪), and from the two polarities originate the four symbols (sixiang 四象)”; this taiji is the one of many. It is said that “the one origin gives rise to many phenomena,” and “many phenomena return to the one”; this is also the one of many. “The nameless is the origin of heaven and earth, and the nameable is the mother of the myriad things”; this is also the one of many. From the above, we can see that the true One is the master of the one of many. “True” means but “unique.” Dao corresponds to that which is true, and thus it does not change or alter but remains as the same principle (li). If one does not know about the true One, one’s root is not deep; if one’s root is not deep, one’s way (dao) is not stable; if one’s way is not stable, one’s belief is not firm. If this is the case, how can one’s way be enduring? Therefore, Islam worships nothing but the true One. - Pg. 51, The Islamic-Confucian Synthesis in China By Zongping Sha (editor), Shuchen Xiang (editor)

Gibberish.

If we're being technical, technical. Shouldn't our default position be that our brains are unable to comprehend past the point in which he described? In the same way that we know we can't comprehend infinity, why should we expect to be able to comprehend God/the Universe? We could be staring the answers right in the face and not recognizing them as well.

You know you doing a good job when they put a video out. Lol it's all out of context

intro goes hard

“Well jews are polytheists too.” Lol

This guy kicked Matt's butt. I am not religious but Matt's own words were put squarely up his bottom. He is a bit too full of himself. However, I like what Matt does in general.

Insane

A little silly. Sounds like he was really pressured somehow when a youngster to conform or embrace some religious dogma. It backfired and everything wound up turned on it's head. Guess what? He's not alone. Without getting into the sordid details, I had a slightly similar experience. My mom was quite religious back in the day and insisted I go to church every Sunday when a little girl. Sunday school, etc. It got old after awhile. All things being equal my dad, on the other hand, was somewhat annoyed at the excessive churchgoing and determined to do something about it. 😀 One bright Sunday morning my mom dragged me off to church. When we got home like 2 hours later we walked in through the gate into this breezeway. I'll never forget the look on my dad's face... I turned around to go into the house and there, tied to a Sycamore tree, was the biggest most bodacious looking black and white pony you ever saw. Fully saddled up with this spectacular black leather saddle with silver conchos and a matching bridle, the pony stood there and looked at me with his ears pricked up. You just better believe that put the kibosh on any more lengthy Sundays in church. His name was Cloud. Cloud became the company mascot, so to speak. He lived a long life, providing rides and "learning experiences" for several kids. He had a mind of his own, and wasn't afraid to exercise his ability to think independently, but he was a good pony. Never mean or malicious, would just "crowhop" a little, stubborn as the devil sometimes - Cloud brought far more smiles than tears, perhaps a good lesson for the rest of us -

Trying to evaluate God from human perspective.

We know what Bible says and what Quran says , 1. We don't kiss kabba stone 2. Quran confirms , Jesus as kalimullah, Ruallah 3. Quran confirms Jesus is a Creator, He created a Bird and gave life by blowing 4. Quran confirms Jesus ascended to heaven as he descended from heaven This 4 confirmation is enough to prove Divinity of Jesus

Nihilism is most rational position.

can i have ur whatsapp no? i wanna ask some questions

Saudi has to rebuild Al baqee

wow great video brother

Yeah so they gave attributes to an attribute lol

True... I too always felt the same... I feel more comfortable with the tasbih than the hand so that i can concentrate on the dikr, does that mean it won't be taken to account. I might not be following the sunnah of using the hand as many says but still my dikr are all valid in the eyes of Allah(swt).

wa alaikum assalam, praise Jesus our Lord and savior🙏🏻

It's nice to see a muslim embrace the holy rosary beads. Hopefully Jesus can take him away from the darkness.😁

Do not believe anything islamic! Islamic teachings are all lies. Islamic god has two right hands and has 1 leg. Read their religious quran book and you’ll find out.

...when someone makes a theological argument and saying its wrong, the only way to rebut the statement is with biblical evidence. If not this is just your opinion. Wanted to hear your biblical rebuttal. Shalom.

"But better than both is the one who has never been born, and has not seen the evil that is done under the sun." Ecclesiastes 4:3

Assalamualaikum bro remember us in your duas 🎉❤

You should read about the Hanafi fiqh of Apostasy Law. They basically state that the male apostate is not to be executed except if his apostasy is harmful [in a aggression/militaristic context] Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-Shaybānī is reported to say in Sharḥal-Siyar al-Kabīr 4/186, Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah: “Disbelief is from the greatest of crimes, but it is between the slave and his Lord. The punishment for this crime is delayed to the Hereafter; as for what happens in this world, it is legislated for the benefit of the servants of God. In this case it (the benefit) is defence against the sedition of fighting. This (sedition) does not appear from non-combatants.” As for the hadith: "“Whoever changes his religion, then kill him.” The Hanafi's viewed it as follows: Shams al-Aʾimma al-Sarakhsī [d.490AH/1090] writes in Al-Mabsūṭ 10/109-110: “As for his saying صلى الله عليه وسلم» Whoever changes his religion then kill him», it is not carried upon its apparent, because changing religions happens when a disbeliever becomes a Muslim, so we know that it is a general wording which has been specified by external evidence,and thus we restrict the apparent.” The Hanafi's also have the following Usuli principle when interpreting the texts: If the narrator of the ḥadīth gives a verdict which contradicts its apparent, then the apparent and unrestricted meaning of the narration is no longer a firm proof. - Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī 2/302, Asfār, Kuwait It should be kept in mind that this principle contradicts the position of some from the ahl al-ḥadīth; that the text takes precedence overthe act of the narrator, should the two contradict. But we are discussing the Hanafi madhab, and by all means and purposes it is a valid madhab. In an ideal Islāmic society, the permanent residents of the land of Islām (Dār al-Islām) are split into two: 1. Muslims 2. Dhimmis (non-Muslim permanent residents) Both have a contract of security. When a male apostatizes, he renounces this pact and thus is considered a combatant by virtue of doing so, regardless of whether or not he engages in any palpable hostility. Consequently, immediate action would become obligatory as a pre-emptive measure to prevent harm against the Muslims. Ibn al-Sāʿātī says in Sharḥ Majma al-Baḥrayn 9/436-437, Darul Fallāh: “...And the mischief which is obligatory to defend against in this case is the mischief of warfare and this is what is expected from the male (apostate).” Imām al-Marghīnānī provides a framework which was utilised by scholars after him. He writes in al-Hidāyah by al-Marghīnānī, volume 4 p.274-275. Dār al-Sirāj: “...And because the original principle is the delay of punishment to the Hereafter, hastening it disrupts the meaning of testing (people on account of their deeds). It is only permitted to do so (to kill apostates) to repel imminent harm, which is combat. This does not apply to women due to their physical incapacity. In contrast to men, apostate women remain (upon the ruling of) an original disbeliever. Elaborating on this, al-Qāḍī al-Attiqānī writes in Amīr Kātib al-Attiqānī, Ghāyat al-Bayān, Volume 8 p.539, Dārul Ḍiyā’: “And because the effective cause (‘illa) for killing is disbelief that leads to combat, the disbelief of a woman could not lead to warfare on account of her physical incapacity, unlike the disbelief of a man, which indeed leads to warfare due to the soundness of his physical structure. **The evidence for this is that anyone whose disbelief could not not lead to warfare is not to be killed**, like the original disbelieving woman, and the same applies to this issue.” In fact, everyone who is not killed in their original disbelief is not killed in their apostasy. This is a general principle which was laid out by Imām Ibn Mawdūd al-Mawṣilī in Al-Ikhtiyār li-Taʿlīl al-Mukhtār. Volume 4, p.95: “All those whom it is not permitted to kill in their original disbelief are not to be killed in their apostasy either.” So the Hanafi madhab allows for courts to judge whether individuals pose any actual harm to the community when they hear of public apostasy, and this seems to be rather fair.

مبارك عليكم ..عيد مبارك❤❤❤

We create meaning ..purpose but that’s based on our own genetic structure

Spot on

mentalbondageinthenameofgod.wordpress.com/ reader.quranite.com/ quranguideblog.wordpress.com/about/

If you cannot present an argument for something you believe and instead must resort to argument ad hominem, you are not even at the sophist level.

Allahu akbar mashaallah

Subhanallah tabarokallah sungguh indah ciptaan mu ya allah