African Dawah Revival
African Dawah Revival
  • 457
  • 67 524
Apostasy Law Solved: The Missing Context To Us Moderns
#islam #apostasy #shariah
0:00 Introduction
1:37 Hizbu Tahrir argument
5:37 Go back in time
8:32 The condition for Islam in the past
8:47 The case of two caliphs
10:26 Every society had apostasy law
11:21 A possible reinterpretation of the conditions
13:00 The 5 minutes apostate dillema
15:32 This apostasy law can be universalised
15:56 No one did Dawah in the past
16:59 Only way to do Dawah in the past
19:05 Conclusion
zhlédnutí: 75

Video

Explaining Ibn Taymiyah's View On God & Space | The Charge of Tajsim | Stanford Paper
zhlédnutí 60Před 9 hodinami
Paper link- plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-taymiyya/#GodSpac written by John Hoover, a scholar on Ibn Taymiyah #aqeedah #ashari #salafi
Jake (Anti-Ashari) Vs John Hoover (Ibn Taymiyah Scholar) @JakeBrancatella
zhlédnutí 1,3KPřed 12 hodinami
#ashari #salafi #aqeedah 0:00 Jake's statement 2:57 Hoover's statement
What if we have been Misreading the Apostasy Law Hadith
zhlédnutí 26Před dnem
#islam #dawah #apostasy #ridda #hadith
Salafi and Sunni debate Istighatha/Shirk | My Take
zhlédnutí 51Před 14 dny
#salafi #sunni #shirk #istighatha 1:27 A background definition 2:05 1. Intercession on the day of judgement 3:28 2. Listen to ex-salafis 5:26 3. Ibadah is not mere asking creation 7:22 4. Why justify shirk? 8:35 5. Christians actually do worship Jesus AS
Using ChatGPT to Refute 300Yrs Old Salafi Dawah on SHIRK
zhlédnutí 131Před 28 dny
what is the definition of shirk in Islam? and who is a Mushrik? These questions are addressed in this video. #islam #shirk #tawasul #istighatha #yasirqadhi
P2 | The Difficult Examples | Worshiping Jesus AS, Shirk or Not? Trinitarians, Unitarians
zhlédnutí 46Před 3 měsíci
P2 | The Difficult Examples | Worshiping Jesus AS, Shirk or Not? Trinitarians, Unitarians
Justice is Meaningless Without the Day of Judgement/Yawmul Qiyama
zhlédnutí 36Před 3 měsíci
Justice is Meaningless Without the Day of Judgement/Yawmul Qiyama
P1 | Calling on the Dead/Graves | Shirk or Not?
zhlédnutí 35Před 3 měsíci
P1 | Calling on the Dead/Graves | Shirk or Not?
A View of Chinese Muslim Street, After Jumuah Salah | Xian, China
zhlédnutí 331Před 4 měsíci
A View of Chinese Muslim Street, After Jumuah Salah | Xian, China
Justice is NOT a game #gametheory
zhlédnutí 19Před 5 měsíci
Justice is NOT a game #gametheory
Listen Atheists/Agnostics!! You Don't Need to be Certain to Believe
zhlédnutí 208Před 5 měsíci
Listen Atheists/Agnostics!! You Don't Need to be Certain to Believe
What does it mean to Believe? (esp. Religious) | Angst of Uncertainty
zhlédnutí 29Před 5 měsíci
What does it mean to Believe? (esp. Religious) | Angst of Uncertainty
God Creates Both the Good & the Evil | is God good?
zhlédnutí 200Před 5 měsíci
God Creates Both the Good & the Evil | is God good?
How to Understand Wars, Power Dynamics, Justice, International Relations, Imperialism
zhlédnutí 41Před 5 měsíci
How to Understand Wars, Power Dynamics, Justice, International Relations, Imperialism
Who is the Real Gnostic Here, Calvinists or Non-calvinists? @Soteriology101
zhlédnutí 179Před 5 měsíci
Who is the Real Gnostic Here, Calvinists or Non-calvinists? @Soteriology101
Ashari Analogy to Defend Theory of Kasb | "God Creates, we Do actions"
zhlédnutí 57Před 5 měsíci
Ashari Analogy to Defend Theory of Kasb | "God Creates, we Do actions"
Are Asharis Jabaris/Fatalists? Well, No
zhlédnutí 64Před 5 měsíci
Are Asharis Jabaris/Fatalists? Well, No
P2- Why are Atheists Not Anti-Natalists?
zhlédnutí 78Před 6 měsíci
P2- Why are Atheists Not Anti-Natalists?
P1- Why are Atheists Not Anti-Natalists?
zhlédnutí 498Před 6 měsíci
P1- Why are Atheists Not Anti-Natalists?
Naïve Atheists think they Have No Worldview
zhlédnutí 60Před 6 měsíci
Naïve Atheists think they Have No Worldview
Nothing Happens Except God's Decree/Qadr
zhlédnutí 45Před 6 měsíci
Nothing Happens Except God's Decree/Qadr
Is God the Author of Sin/Evil? Given Determinism | Dr Guillaume Bignon
zhlédnutí 59Před 6 měsíci
Is God the Author of Sin/Evil? Given Determinism | Dr Guillaume Bignon
The Puppet/Robot, Coercion & Manipulation Objections to Determinism | Dr Guillaume Bignon
zhlédnutí 55Před 6 měsíci
The Puppet/Robot, Coercion & Manipulation Objections to Determinism | Dr Guillaume Bignon
Grounding Moral Responsibility, given Determinism | Compatibilism | Dr Taylor Cyr
zhlédnutí 38Před 6 měsíci
Grounding Moral Responsibility, given Determinism | Compatibilism | Dr Taylor Cyr
Can God Punish the Good? | Divine Command Theory + Coherentism | "Arbitrary" Will Objection
zhlédnutí 69Před 6 měsíci
Can God Punish the Good? | Divine Command Theory Coherentism | "Arbitrary" Will Objection
Refuting Salafis On Secondary Power & "Puppet" Polemic | Asharite Occasionalism Defended
zhlédnutí 60Před 6 měsíci
Refuting Salafis On Secondary Power & "Puppet" Polemic | Asharite Occasionalism Defended

Komentáře

  • @ninchiedunn
    @ninchiedunn Před 8 hodinami

    Isnt that the guy that said its ok for children to have seggs😳 i swear islam is a cult for weirdos. Most muslims are misled which is shameful but the ones that know and still think its alright need to be locked away.

  • @arvee-4699
    @arvee-4699 Před 16 hodinami

    cancer is everywhere damn man for real apostasy law duh let people live and if they want let them go to hell instead of making laws damn idiotic

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 10 hodinami

      Sorry I don't get your point, are you with me or against? 😂

    • @arvee-4699
      @arvee-4699 Před 44 minutami

      @@africandawahrevival brother i am neither against anyone nor for anyone , but i believe in live and let live as i say :) btw i am against islam in general so you can assume but i am not against muslims

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 8 minutami

      @@arvee-4699 I see, I don't think you should be against islam but against bad people no matter which religion or beliefs they have, that's much better.

  • @othmanohgf8748
    @othmanohgf8748 Před 20 hodinami

    I watched a lot of Jake; he never said Ibn Taymiyah wasn't an occasionalist. The problem is that you misunderstand what Ibn Taymiyah means by occasionalism and what Ashari means by occasionalism.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 20 hodinami

      @@othmanohgf8748 ok, what is the difference, and is such difference such that it warrants such rhetoric against the Ashari position? Especially given the context of the video, Dr Javed accused traditional Islam of being fatalistic given determinism, Jake then went to say "...we agree with you (Dr Javed) that the Ashari position is silly...", don't you think that's a bit too much, given that you yourself think that Jake is also an occasionalist, btw, do you have video where he calls Ibn Taymiyah occasionalist?

    • @othmanohgf8748
      @othmanohgf8748 Před 16 hodinami

      @@africandawahrevival You can watch Jake debate vs. Jay Dyer, where Jake examines (questioning) Jay Dyer; that's where he mentioned it. As far as the difference between the two, Ashari says that fire has no innate ability to burn, but Allah creates the burn at the moment of contact. But that's problematic because that's what criminals want. I didn't kill the guy, but Allah made the bullet kill him. and the Sunni position is that causes are influential, not in themselves. When Sunni say causes are influential, they oppose the Ashari school, and when they say not in themselves, they oppose the people who put natural causes equal to Allah.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 16 hodinami

      @@othmanohgf8748 oh I see, the problem with that view is easily addressed, have you ever wondered why Asharis/Sunnis do not affirm this "influential cause" you speak of? Because, this cause itself is dependent on God's will to influence anything, so if fire touches the cotton, it will not be able to have any influence of burning save God allowance, so in the end, the influence is superfluous and if your position get pushed a little more, you will realise how you will end up allying with the naturalists, whereas our position is safe and gives all efficient cause to God only. Read Aqeedah At Tahawiyah on this issue it is online in English, especially the parts where he talks about "the actions of the creatures and the creation of God", etc.

    • @othmanohgf8748
      @othmanohgf8748 Před 16 hodinami

      @@africandawahrevival The Sunni position couldn't be the same as that of the naturalists, who say causes are influenceable and innate. Sunni says causes are influenceable, not innate. As far as the fire and cotton, who brought the cotton to the fire? Another influential being who has no innate ability. As far as the rest, that's just rhetoric. But I ask you if A shot B, and you ask A why you killed B, and he replies, No, you got it all wrong. If it weren't for Allah making the bullet go through his body, A wouldn't have died. What would you say?

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 15 hodinami

      @@othmanohgf8748 I would say A killed B, and he is responsible, God CREATES our actions, He doesn't DO our actions, we do them, get it? That distinction has to be made between God creating and we doing. This can also be done by changing perspective, we differentiate between God's perspective from our perspective/POV, just like in the video.

  • @jethrosheikh6994
    @jethrosheikh6994 Před dnem

    Jake needs to calm down , he takes himself bit too seriously as though he is some expert in kalaam. He is as passionate now as a salafi as he was then a quraanist.

  • @timb350
    @timb350 Před dnem

    No God, no freewill, and no purpose to life. What is surprising...is just how trivially easy it is to utterly demolish every single one of these conclusions.

  • @africandawahrevival

    For more deeper understanding of some of these issues, I suggest you read; 1. Works focussing on the shift from empire to nation states. 2. Rousseau's argument on apostates, on the basis perjury/oath break, it is in the 4th book of Social Contract of Rousseau ending part, or read Hobbes Leviathan for deeper understanding of oaths/contracts. Have you ever wondered why the final decision to execute apostate or not is always referred in the end to the Leader/Caliph/Government? Because it is their authority that is being challenged due to perjury/treason.

  • @_Ahmed_W-
    @_Ahmed_W- Před 2 dny

    It's weird, Jake's teacher was Dr Shadee Elmasry, an Ashari

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 2 dny

      I thought Dr Shadee was Athari Hanbali tho 🤔, and how did you know he was his teacher? I didn't know that

    • @_Ahmed_W-
      @_Ahmed_W- Před 2 dny

      @@africandawahrevival I heard he was his teach And no, Dr Shadee is Maliki Ashari

    • @_Ahmed_W-
      @_Ahmed_W- Před 2 dny

      *teacher

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 2 dny

      @@_Ahmed_W- oh I see, got you.

    • @jethrosheikh6994
      @jethrosheikh6994 Před dnem

      As salafis do, probably refutes his teacher now.

  • @zakyzayn5361
    @zakyzayn5361 Před 4 dny

    I think we should move on from Aristotelian & old kalam Ontological view of space time to modern one where there is room for dynamism and substantial Motion where space time and matter is held as System of interrelated events rather than objects persisting in space time with varying states. Here substance and accidents both are seen as emergent realities where there will automatically be no room for anthropomorphism What do you think about it

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      I see, there is even another method I thought of, by using the Kantian view of seeing space and time as mental mechanisms of humans, instead of saying that space and time are in the essence of things observed, not to talk of God's essence, we simply say we don't know.

  • @zakyzayn5361
    @zakyzayn5361 Před 4 dny

    But what space and time is originated 🫡

  • @africandawahrevival

    Disclaimer guys ⚠️ : There is some noise in the video, I'm sorry. Link: plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-taymiyya/#GodSpac

  • @Pendekar-1144
    @Pendekar-1144 Před 4 dny

    Brother has discord?

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      Sorry I don't, but if you want to reach me privately check my bio for my Instagram or we can discuss here on CZcams

    • @Pendekar-1144
      @Pendekar-1144 Před 4 dny

      ​ Got it, Allahumma Barrik brother, eid Mubarrak

  • @Pendekar-1144
    @Pendekar-1144 Před 4 dny

    How's brother position to istighatha, is it okay?

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      We don't encourage people to do it, in fact it is better not to do it, but we do not think it is Shirk, nor consider those who do it as mushriks, unless all the conditions for shirk has been confirmed.

    • @Pendekar-1144
      @Pendekar-1144 Před 4 dny

      @@africandawahrevival I sees brother points of view, yes when it comes to istighatha, there's ikhtilaf, one say permissible, one say haram, none would calls it shirk and doers as mushrikeen lol, although tawassul and istighatha term is interchangeable, although i am in stands that tawassul is allowed, And istighatha is permissible (but to me, highly recommended if only done if a sheikh already explained properly the meaning and intentions behind it or to better do it with a sheikh to avoid misunderstanding

  • @Pendekar-1144
    @Pendekar-1144 Před 4 dny

    Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh, are you a sunni ashari? Salam from Indonesia

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      Wa alaykum Salaam warahmatullah wabarakatuh, yes I am Sunni, and inclined towards Ashari method in Aqeedah. 👍

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      Salamat pagi 😁, I have many Indonesian friends in my school in China.

    • @Pendekar-1144
      @Pendekar-1144 Před 4 dny

      @@africandawahrevival Nice to hear brother, Masya'allah tabarakallah

  • @googleaccount065
    @googleaccount065 Před 5 dny

    Hoover 😂😂😂😂

  • @myasesaleh4631
    @myasesaleh4631 Před 5 dny

    Salam walakume! Can you summarize what you said? I got lost! This trinity thing is complex

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      Basically the argument is that during the incarnation, it is supposed to be a union between the divine and the human, and yet there is only one person; Trinity- 3 divine persons, F, S & H Incarnation - 1 divine person (S) + Human nature Human nature with body and soul Incarnation - 2 persons, 1 divine person + 1 human person ✅ Christians - 1 person in incarnation 🤔🔴 Who died on the cross then? Remember I said 'who', the question of who applies to persons, not nature, therefore, it is either the human person or divine person, the divine person cannot die by definition, so it has to be the human nature, which is a heresy (Nestorianism). It's been long since I made this video but that's basically the argument, hope you are clear now, the Trinitarians are inconsistent when using the term persons in the trinity as compared to the incarnation.

  • @africandawahrevival

    So, basically, according to what John Hoover said there, the Secondary power/causation that Jake is going on about is only perspectival, that is, only from creature's/human POV, which is not against anything the Asharis themselves say, notice how the professor even mentioned that this was exactly Ar Razi's position, Ar Razi? whom Ibn Taymiyah considers as a typical Ashari/Maturidi, see, so maybe Jake needs to stop this Anti-Ashari charade he's been spreading online. Here is a short argument, if you believe in Qadr, which every Muslim ought to, we can argue to Ashari Occassionalism from there, without denying human/creature's POV, that's what compatibilism is.

    • @AShaif
      @AShaif Před 5 dny

      Just a question here: If Ibn Tayimiyyah says without God's X act, we wouldn't be able to exist, let alone breathe; also, if Alaghazali says without God's Y act, we wouldn't be able to exist or breathe either. Then comes a "conciler" and says well, Y is kinda X. It's just that X is more general and closer to the majority interpretations of Quran and Hadith, while Y could be some other more specific or a bit less prevailing interpretation of God's act that might need more evidence or enunciation, which could later be the morr accurate interpretation, but at the end, it's compatibilism anyways. So , what's the fuss about ? If jake is making the fuss, then it's known that Jake and others get caught up in the fight between sects a lot, which is the slippery slope of scoial media anyways, it is really difficult not to get tangled up in arguments and lose the supreme goal (elevating and sharing God's words) in return for in-the-heat personal ego gains or what have you. but by tagging jake and making up recent videos about him and others about similar topics, aren't you doing the same thing by presenting your point of view rather than being the "Conciler" example above? Why not shift the focus on more pressing matters like your other older videos? maybe refreshing videos like how to clarify the Islamic concept of dunya as a testing place to the youth living in your city/country/ummah , theists or otherwise, or the introduction of critical thinking given from an Islamic perspective for young adults going into the workforce, or how to stand firmly on a moral ground in the days of deceipt we live in such as denying Gaza massacres, etc.. Why dwell on the unseen God's ability to be omnipotent while still creating and enabling creatures with somewhat free-will? You are only adding wood to the fire by replying and tagging Jake. He will not listen. This argumentation will not stop by adding another. This goes to all social media Dawah or new muslim debators, like Haqiqat or Mohammed shams eddin or anyone. This is a Fitna that we should not indulge in. Maybe one video , and that's it. but then , we should steer our priorities right. wouldn't you agree? I have no intention but to stop this from going on brother Wallahi. sorry if I'm being harsh, but this is not for you specifically, it's just a frustrated cryout. Jake is not a lying pseudo-muslim like Nas Daily, or guys from Taqueen institute in Egypt who must be rebutted with counter argumentation, he's only in the heat of the social media war of sects and interpretations. it'll come to pass one day inshallah. Let's not be it's fuel to go on. Thank you.

    • @ahmedfarahat8489
      @ahmedfarahat8489 Před 4 dny

      Before ibn taymmyah even 1000 scholars had said that Asharia are infidels as sheikh al Islam al ansari mentioned in his book Zam al kalam and he was before ibn taymmyah with 200 years

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      @@ahmedfarahat8489 You have probably been sold the nonsense that Asharis are Jahmis, everyone refuted the Jahmis. How is this related to the topic shown in the video? 🤔, please stick to the topic.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 4 dny

      @@AShaif noted 👍.

    • @ahmedfarahat8489
      @ahmedfarahat8489 Před 4 dny

      @@africandawahrevival and I am waiting a non Arab who never knew who are the salaf even to tell me so ?

  • @JustinAndCars
    @JustinAndCars Před 6 dny

    Dr Jay Smith 1 - This Guy 0

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 6 dny

      Ok, 😁. Very profound point you made there mate

    • @JustinAndCars
      @JustinAndCars Před 6 dny

      @@africandawahrevival fine, I truly hope your mind is open because I am going to answer you in an honest and very respectful way my brother I really hope you catch what I am going to throw at you .. First point, I agree Indeed, God is immortal secondly, I hope you agree that God is not limited by time or space. So now that we clarified those two things here’s the main point: To die, is to cease from existing. Which Yeshua did not do, The Son suffered a DEATH OF THE FLESH, not his spirit. Because he exists outside of this dimension, it is entirely possible for the Christian doctrine of “God atones for the sins of humanity, by offering a Pure and Holy Sacrifice (mind you, until this point, the Jews would u Gods exists in a dimension we cannot see or touch, god is able to reveal himself in anyway that he sees fitting. God is not limited to or defined by his creations.. the same way you can probably deduce some personality traits from the design or creation of an engineer [(myself)i.e: because I chose this material rather than “x material” you can say I am a “blah blah” kind of person” but, you will not be able to describe me as a human being, my attributes, etc simply by the thing that I have created…

  • @gracious6575
    @gracious6575 Před 6 dny

    No compulsion in religion was when Mohammed had not gained power to conquer people. When he gained power, he said if anyone leaves his religion, kill him.

  • @gracious6575
    @gracious6575 Před 6 dny

    Your lack of understanding doesn't mean something is not factual. The word God is a title given to a divine being. It’s not a name. The word president is a title given to someone in authority, but it's not their name. The word HUMAN is a title given to mortal beings. There is one divine being (God) having 3 persons of equal authority and there is one mortal being (human) having many persons of equal rights.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 6 dny

      You might be new to this, but it isn't I who lack understanding, I have studied this topic extensively, you can check my Contra-Trinity playlist, you might learn a thing or two if you are open minded. 👍

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 6 dny

      Given your analogy of Humans, don't you see how that leads to polytheism? If all human persons have equal humanity, speaking of quantity, and what would constitute polytheism if not this.

    • @gracious6575
      @gracious6575 Před 6 dny

      You studied something doesn't mean you understood it. That's what im saying. Even in the quran God always presents himself as a plural as well as on the Bible. He said "let us make man in our image" im very open minded but i think you're associating your logical thinking with your beliefs. You say because the quran said not because you studied. ​@africandawahrevival

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 6 dny

      @gracious6575 Your responses and arguments shows me that you have not studied this very deeply, no offence, that's why I was referencing some of my works on this, if you don't by that, why don't you start with this, search Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy trinity, read that, then we can discuss further, ok. Quick reply on the "plurality" thing, have you heard of a royal WE before? that's the answer.

  • @gracious6575
    @gracious6575 Před 6 dny

    Punished by death? Who has the right to take a life he did not create ? God please help me

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 6 dny

      That's what the video was against, especially unaliving people because of theological disagreements.

    • @gracious6575
      @gracious6575 Před 6 dny

      A Muslim guy said on live video that if you associate Allah with anyone, the punishment is death. Just like apostasy, if anyone leaves Islam, he has to be killed 😢. Like this is so scary

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 6 dny

      @@gracious6575 I know, but I have been making videos to refute this claim, it makes more sense that people in the past were executed for treason or breach of oath of allegiance, than because of religion change, you can watch some of my content on this (check Contra-Apostacy law playlist)

  • @africandawahrevival

    وَلَوْ شِئْنَا لَآتَيْنَا كُلَّ نَفْسٍ هُدَاهَا وَلَٰكِنْ حَقَّ الْقَوْلُ مِنِّي لَأَمْلَأَنَّ جَهَنَّمَ مِنَ الْجِنَّةِ وَالنَّاسِ أَجْمَعِينَ And if We had willed, surely! We would have given every person his guidance, but the Word from Me took effect (about evil_doers), that I will fill Hell with jinn and mankind together. (As-Sajdah 32:13) My Commentary: (1) Look especially at this one in Surah Sajdah, after God said that if He willed, He could have guided everyone, He doesn't then say ... but even if He(God) had guided them, they would have still turned away", rather it talks about why God, not man, God chose not to guide all, keeps some characters as evildoers and deservedly punish them, that's how He chose to write His book (2) The best explanation is to say that God is writing a book, we are the characters, the evil characters are punished, the good characters rewarded, those who are evil know that they are evil, the hypocrites wants the salvation for the evil, he winds up becoming an atheist and himself participate in evil, the good are usually not aware of their status, because they have humility and strive to do more good, they worry not about those that are evil, just as the evil worry not about those that are good. "Worry not, if you are not an evildoer, have hope on the justice and mercy of God, and do not transgress limits" (3) The Compatibilist part is to show how God can create an evildoer and yet it is the evildoer not God, that is responsible for the action he does (4) Maybe the right question that needs to be asked is this, "can God guide a person such that he never turns away from guidance?" (Look how we went straight down the Calvinism-Arminian debate from Islam, lol)

  • @ArchiveofTawheed
    @ArchiveofTawheed Před 8 dny

    Legislation (tashree') is only for Allah. Legislating, giving hukm is among Allah's Attributes. Al-Maidah 44 is a supporting daleel for the takfir of those who rule by other than what Allah has revealed. The main evidence is La ilaha illallah. The one who rules by other than what Allah has revealed is taking the authority that should only be for the Creator upon themselves. They are making themselves the ilah by enforcing the laws they made of their own desires. They are called taghut. Whoever doesn't make takfir upon them while knowing of their deeds becomes a kafir himself.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 7 dny

      Yeah, but what about whoever does not refute or disassociate from a khawarij?

  • @denohart4929
    @denohart4929 Před 9 dny

    You you completely gave an incorrect label to Abu Khadeejah as a “quitest” and main motto. Whoever doubts that someone is a Khariji or Ahlul biddah is a general statement and his implications before applying it to a specific INDIVIDUAL… they don’t label people as innovators without establishing the hujjah first.

  • @denohart4929
    @denohart4929 Před 9 dny

    So Ibn Taymiyyah may Allah have mercy upon him was a Kaffir according to this speaker when he excused “Al-Bakri” who was a sufi scholar that called to Istigatha with the prophet peace be upon him in his book titled “refuting Al Bakri” due to his ignorance…

  • @abhmmh8892
    @abhmmh8892 Před 14 dny

    Sounds like henotheism (the title)

  • @artnile9818
    @artnile9818 Před 14 dny

    You just embarrassed yourself in this video. Nowhere in the gospel did it say to kill Christian apostate. Do a proper research before make a video. Even the Jews they don’t kill their apostate anymore.

  • @abdul2499
    @abdul2499 Před 14 dny

    With all due respect sir, "it doesn't sound right to me" is not an argument. It sounds like you started with the premise of "it doesn't sound right to me" and did mental gymnastics to arrive at the points that you brought up. Can you name one pre-modern Islamic scholar that had this view? There are clear-cut verses in the quran that contradict the points you have made in this video. Let's be careful about the things we say about Islam as it's very easy to fall into error. I appreciate your creativity in trying to produce new thought, but I suggest you consult people of knowledge before spreading views on a platform like this. May Allah forgive our shortcomings. Barakallahu feek.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 14 dny

      Ameen. Can you point out the verses that you speak of that cannot be contextualised to a specific case? I can give you many verses from the Qur'an supporting what I proposed, that is "...go for peace, if they (enemies/non-muslims) go for peace...", "...spare those who fight you not, nor drove you out of your homes...", "Treaty of Hudaibiya", etc. I don't see anything against Islam in what I said in the video, are you saying that "we should fight everyone who is not Muslim, whether they offer peace or not, whether they maintain their treaty or not, we fight them"?

    • @abdul2499
      @abdul2499 Před 6 dny

      ​@@africandawahrevival If there was a legitimate Islamic state established (there is none established currently), it will be incumbent upon them to engage in expansive jihad if the conditions are met. This involves approaching different countries and conquering them to Instill Allah's law. They are given the option of converting or paying the jizya to the Islamic rule. Evidences that support this point include: Q9:29: "Fight those People of the Book who do not believe in Allah, nor in the Last Day, and do not take as unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have declared as unlawful, and do not profess the Faith of Truth; (fight them) until they pay jizyah with their own hands while they are subdued". The tafsir by ma'arif al-Quran says this applies to every non-believer and not just people of the book. If there were any group that should have been exempt, it would have been people of the book, but even they are included. Q9:123: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you, and let them find severity in you. Know well that Allah is with the God-fearing." hadith 8, arbaeen an-nawawi : The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "I have been ordered to fight against the people until they testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and until they establish the salah and pay the zakat. And if they do that then they will have gained protection from me for their lives and property, unless [they commit acts that are punishable] in Islam, and their reckoning will be with Allah." These sound pretty clear cut to me. I would like to hear what your responses to these evidences are though. barakallahu feek.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 5 dny

      @@abdul2499 I have several ways of response; 1- verses of peace, "Fight not those who fight you not, if they seek peace, you seek peace". (paraphrased) وَقَـٰتِلُوا۟ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلَّذِينَ يُقَـٰتِلُونَكُمْ وَلَا تَعْتَدُوٓا۟ ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ ٱلْمُعْتَدِينَ ١٩٠ Fight in the cause of Allah ˹only˺ against those who wage war against you, but do not exceed the limits. Allah does not like transgressors. (2:190) لَّا يَنْهَىٰكُمُ ٱللَّهُ عَنِ ٱلَّذِينَ لَمْ يُقَـٰتِلُوكُمْ فِى ٱلدِّينِ وَلَمْ يُخْرِجُوكُم مِّن دِيَـٰرِكُمْ أَن تَبَرُّوهُمْ وَتُقْسِطُوٓا۟ إِلَيْهِمْ ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يُحِبُّ ٱلْمُقْسِطِينَ ٨ Allah does not forbid you from dealing kindly and fairly with those who have neither fought nor driven you out of your homes. Surely Allah loves those who are fair. (60:8) إِلَّا ٱلَّذِينَ يَصِلُونَ إِلَىٰ قَوْمٍۭ بَيْنَكُمْ وَبَيْنَهُم مِّيثَـٰقٌ أَوْ جَآءُوكُمْ حَصِرَتْ صُدُورُهُمْ أَن يُقَـٰتِلُوكُمْ أَوْ يُقَـٰتِلُوا۟ قَوْمَهُمْ ۚ وَلَوْ شَآءَ ٱللَّهُ لَسَلَّطَهُمْ عَلَيْكُمْ فَلَقَـٰتَلُوكُمْ ۚ فَإِنِ ٱعْتَزَلُوكُمْ فَلَمْ يُقَـٰتِلُوكُمْ وَأَلْقَوْا۟ إِلَيْكُمُ ٱلسَّلَمَ فَمَا جَعَلَ ٱللَّهُ لَكُمْ عَلَيْهِمْ سَبِيلًۭا ٩٠ Except for those who take refuge with a people between yourselves and whom is a treaty or those who come to you, their hearts strained at [the prospect of] fighting you or fighting their own people. And if Allāh had willed, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. So if they remove themselves from you and do not fight you and offer you peace, then Allāh has not made for you a cause [for fighting] against them. (4:90) 2- golden principle, reciprocity argument: If we can justify an unprovoked invasion, then others can as well, and war will be perpetual, the core message of Islam cannot be military conquests, lest the people would have been justified in objecting to it. 3- political realism, I believe that the early Muslims fought because of being in an anarchical situation, a world of expansionist empires. 4- other Islamic empires were fought as well, even though they were Muslims, which shows the political side of things rather than religious, which is exactly my point. 5- Lastly, I am not a pacifist, I believe you can fight to defend yourself and even expand, but not for religion per se, but for politics instead, such that were you to fail, it would be you who failed, not Islam, Islam never dies, it keeps on spreading whether there is a Caliphate or not. I can't go into too much details here, but I think this should suffice, especially the first one, Barakallahu feek 👍.

  • @eldiscipuloandalusi
    @eldiscipuloandalusi Před 14 dny

    I'm sorry but you are completely wrong. Who are we to change Islamic law? Islam was always a well-established way of life under the Quran and Sunnah. Why accommodate Islam to Western philosophy based on unfounded emotions? Apostasy manifests itself in 3 ways. 1. In belief. For example, considering lawful what Allah has explicitly prohibited. This is where your rejection of the application of hudud to an apostate comes in. 2. In the word. Insulting Allah, His Messenger, the holy books... 3. In the work. Actions and beliefs contrary to Islam like helping unbelievers, etc. Apostasy is punished if the person does not repent. In case of repentance, he is forgiven as Allah is the Most Merciful and his religion teaches forgiveness. Narrated 'Aisha: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "If somebody innovates something which is not in harmony with the principles of our religion, that thing is rejected." [Sahih Bukhari 2697] Now, the question is... Why are you innovating something that was never taught by the Prophet ﷺ nor his Companions? I will stop following this channel. May Allah guide you.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 14 dny

      Well you are wrong and probably haven't studied this topic deeply, you are free to unsubscribe, for no one forced you to subscribe in the first place. 👍

  • @lucashenzo3023
    @lucashenzo3023 Před 14 dny

    Show us in the Bible where it's said in the Christian scriptures please.

  • @user-uh6vy4mo3j
    @user-uh6vy4mo3j Před 15 dny

    💗💗💗John 3:16💗💗💗

  • @freeyourmind7538
    @freeyourmind7538 Před 16 dny

    i feel the same too, i feel that putting someone to death for changing their belief is a little too much, especially if they are not a threat. Like, the apostates still abide by the islamic law when they are outside and dont start insulting the prophet(pbuh) or Allah, then do your thing, pay your Jiziya and be you but confined within the Islamic ruling, just as i am confined within the liberal ruling. On the other hand, as far as i know, its not Quranic material to determine the consequence of an apostate, so i think, expelling them from a country/city is an option or turn them into a refugee and have a liberal state adopt their own babies. I heard once, can't back it but it makes sense that this harsh punishment of putting an apostate to death was during troubling times in the early days of Islam. For example, people would 'revert' to islam, get hidden information and hand it over to the pagans during war. Therefore, reversion was taking seriously at that time because of conflict....I mean, that's reasonable to me, you cant have spies wandering around your community at the time of war. Dont get me wrong, death is still an option but i feel it doesnt have to be the first choice, but you have a point too...these reverts that come into Islam from other religions should be out to death too, and if that happened would there be any muslims, or there would be a big war taking place 🤷🏾‍♂

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 16 dny

      Yeah, I used to always understand it in light of either the context of war, where it is seen as treason, or some context lost to us in modernity, but these defenders have explicitly clarified that "it is not because of any threat, but for the very change of religion itself", that's when I disagreed with the whole thing. I even understand harsh punishments like stoning adulterers to death and others, but killing someone for not believing anymore, that, I don't get, and after also seeing the consequences of this law in how many innocent lives have been cut off for merely being charged with apostasy, this is what the jihadis do.

    • @doflamingo5345
      @doflamingo5345 Před 15 dny

      Why you said ," just religion " , religion is the most important. And we don't base our religion on other religion don't kill apostates, we do it, don't think like if.religion is subjective

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 15 dny

      @@doflamingo5345 Yeah religion is the most important, but there is also "no compulsion in religion", "whoever wills let him believe, whoever wills let him disbelieve", and many other verses. Let me ask you a difficult question to help you see the problem with killing apostates for changing religion and not for threat or other reasons, did you know that child apostates are to be killed aswell? and how old do you think they have to be before they can be killed?

  • @snuffywuffykiss1522
    @snuffywuffykiss1522 Před 17 dny

    The 2 have literally nothing to do with each other. I am an Atheist and a Humanist. I strive to make the world a better place for all our children.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 16 dny

      If I may ask, have you studied or read Anti-natalists works?

    • @snuffywuffykiss1522
      @snuffywuffykiss1522 Před 16 dny

      @@africandawahrevival Nope, Why should I? I am in favor of humanity having lots of babies. Are you trying to convince me to be an anti natalist?

  • @snuffywuffykiss1522
    @snuffywuffykiss1522 Před 20 dny

    So Seriously. Not Kidding. Why should I believe your fairy tale story over observable Reality?

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 20 dny

      Because there is nothing like observation reality, it is a myth used to snatch the unaware into a contrivance of horror. I only ask you to believe in two propositions; 1- That you were created by God 2- That there is life after death Why? you might ask, (1) the universe emerged and it is reasonable to propose a creator, (2) the afterlife is where justice is served to all those who were wronged. If you think this are fairytales provide your own answer to address this issue, seriously, no kidding. Lastly, one could argue from (2) to (1), like I did in one of my recent videos, on justice, here is a snippet; - you watch injustice happen, let's say a case of a genocide of an entire nation, like that in the Melian dialogue. - the perpetrators got away and nothing happened - you want them to be brought to justice - you believe that there is life after death where the innocents will get their justice and judgement will be enacted on the tyrant. - you either want this or you don't, it is not by force, and since it is something in the future and a possibility, you believe. Another way is the existentialist path, but I stop here for now.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 20 dny

      Have you ever heard of modal logic? Also, tone it down a bit, CZcams will delete your comments, lol.

    • @snuffywuffykiss1522
      @snuffywuffykiss1522 Před 19 dny

      @@africandawahrevival You are the one saying that reality is not real and fantasy is truth. I merely asked you to show the courage of your conviction.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 19 dny

      @@snuffywuffykiss1522 I never said reality is not real, I am only saying that all realities are interpreted by man, and we differ in its interpretation. Also, notice that I am not disputing with you if 1+1=2 or any typical scientific facts, this is a philosophical issue, issues about the origin of the universe and the meaning of man's existence, you can't simply point to "observable reality" in this cases, you have to make a judgement. Take the case of a man beating another to death, what just happened here? we all observed it? It is real? but what does it mean? Murder or not? Right or wrong? etc, no appeal to science or "observable reality" can aid us here.

    • @snuffywuffykiss1522
      @snuffywuffykiss1522 Před 19 dny

      @@africandawahrevival The origin of the universe in a question of natural science, not philosophy. Meaning is both personal and subjective. As to observed reality... If we witness a man beat another man to death then THAT is what we witness in reality. You moral view or the legal definition of the action are both again personal and subjective. And by the way... There is a such a thing as social sciences where we study human interactions... But you wouldn't know about that because its not in your special magic book... So how about you stop trying to change subjects and doing the standard apologetic tap dance. Just give 1 REAL reason to believe in your fairy tale imaginary sky wizard.

  • @User_47536
    @User_47536 Před 27 dny

    "Asking Dajjal to refute Tawheed "

  • @africandawahrevival
    @africandawahrevival Před měsícem

    Note: If you say that Dua is to ask not just anyone for something, but God/gods, or deity/deities, or asking as someone would ask God or a deity, then most people you charge with shirk do not do that, nor believe that, now, except you rephrase your argument as any asking whatsoever, which is why I asked such questions from ChatGPT.

  • @DrWoofOfficial
    @DrWoofOfficial Před měsícem

    nice video akhi

  • @zakyzayn5361
    @zakyzayn5361 Před měsícem

    Wang Daiyu, also known as Zhenhui Laoren (“the true old man of Islam” 真回老人), lived approximately between 1580 and 1660 AD. He is the first Chinese Hui Muslim scholar to discuss Islamic philosophy systematically and put it into publication. Zhengjiao Zhenquan is a book that introduces Islamic doctrines; it is divided into two volumes, with a total of ten chapters. In this book, Wang Daiyu emphasizes that the oneness of “the true One” is “the separate and different oneness” (单另之一). He clearly states that the true One is “not the one of many”; rather, “the true One is the master of the one of many.” He says: It must be known that the true One is the separate and different One; it is not the one of many. The one of many is not the unique One. It is said that “from taiji (the supreme ultimate 太极) originate the two polarities (liangyi 两仪), and from the two polarities originate the four symbols (sixiang 四象)”; this taiji is the one of many. It is said that “the one origin gives rise to many phenomena,” and “many phenomena return to the one”; this is also the one of many. “The nameless is the origin of heaven and earth, and the nameable is the mother of the myriad things”; this is also the one of many. From the above, we can see that the true One is the master of the one of many. “True” means but “unique.” Dao corresponds to that which is true, and thus it does not change or alter but remains as the same principle (li). If one does not know about the true One, one’s root is not deep; if one’s root is not deep, one’s way (dao) is not stable; if one’s way is not stable, one’s belief is not firm. If this is the case, how can one’s way be enduring? Therefore, Islam worships nothing but the true One. - Pg. 51, The Islamic-Confucian Synthesis in China By Zongping Sha (editor), Shuchen Xiang (editor)

  • @RRHINE13
    @RRHINE13 Před měsícem

    Gibberish.

  • @l3hxy
    @l3hxy Před měsícem

    If we're being technical, technical. Shouldn't our default position be that our brains are unable to comprehend past the point in which he described? In the same way that we know we can't comprehend infinity, why should we expect to be able to comprehend God/the Universe? We could be staring the answers right in the face and not recognizing them as well.

    • @ivanjaldin235
      @ivanjaldin235 Před měsícem

      Comes to show people are so different. Whenever something unexplained is infront of us some will shy away and claim the universe is incomprehensible, others will just keep walking, and yet others will muster their strength to understand it

    • @l3hxy
      @l3hxy Před měsícem

      @@ivanjaldin235 I agree, but I don't see this as shying away. I view this situation more like scientists falling into the trap of needing to announce an answer. I will continue my search for answers as vigorously as Sapolsky and I take his thoughts with great consideration. However, at the end of it all, we can't dismiss the very real limitations of the human brain. Humans are good at observing and re-creating, but I'm not sure we even *can* create ideas that come from nothing. And as we know it today, the universe came from nothing.

  • @williamray9359
    @williamray9359 Před měsícem

    You know you doing a good job when they put a video out. Lol it's all out of context

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před měsícem

      What context? Can you put it back in context, atleast one of the points made in the video?

  • @maxresdefault8235
    @maxresdefault8235 Před měsícem

    intro goes hard

  • @muratsen2
    @muratsen2 Před měsícem

    “Well jews are polytheists too.” Lol

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před měsícem

      Lol 😂, don't do that, for the rebuttal to work, you have to show that the Christians are on their own in this particular issue, because, they appealed to the Jews to ostracize the Muslims, but the Jews reject the trinity or any such plurality.

    • @muratsen2
      @muratsen2 Před měsícem

      @@africandawahrevival I get it, I saw the claim recently so the video was informative about philo and karbala. it’s just funny how they try this. They even try this claim with the Quran. “Islam isn’t monotheism because the Quran is an attribute of Allah”, because they secretly believe all attributes of God are their own fully divine persons with their own attributes. Literally no brains. Idk if you’ve seen that claim.

  • @k.k.9011
    @k.k.9011 Před měsícem

    This guy kicked Matt's butt. I am not religious but Matt's own words were put squarely up his bottom. He is a bit too full of himself. However, I like what Matt does in general.

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před měsícem

      Fair enough 👍

    • @iainrendle7989
      @iainrendle7989 Před 27 dny

      Think you need to watch the whole debate and not just cherry picked elements, and then determine which person came across as honest, truthful and able to make reasonable arguments. Given time and lots of people to pick out contridictions and mis-spoken terminologies in someone's entire recorded events then anyone can create a collage that says what you want it to say. If you take the supposed words of Jesus, his life, his actions, his death etc from the so called eye witness testimony then you can shape it to prove that Jesus is actually the agent of Satan, and the whole thing is a ruse......and that has been done, without additional material or altering the texts of the Gospels.......

    • @africandawahrevival
      @africandawahrevival Před 26 dny

      Yeah, but this point cannot be substantiated, what exactly was misrepresented? Clarify any claim attributed to Matt, which he doesn't hold, if you cannot do this, maybe it is you who need to watch the whole debate, I don't need to put the entire length of the video to prove something Matt believes in himself and said it as clearly without ambiguity.