Video

@@christopheryurkiewicz7395 nope, I would have dye both my skin and hair much darker if I were shooting for that.

You’re welcome!

I would say that if you’re predisposed to not believing in miracles then sure you could call the resurrection an unreasonable explanation. Logically, however, if a supernatural God exists then miracles can certainly occur when and if God chooses. I believe that the historical evidence shows Jesus was executed on the cross, and the grave was empty 3 days later. If it wasn’t and Jesus hadn’t risen from the grave then Christianity would have been able to be stopped immediately by the enemies of Christ simply providing the body. What do you think happened?

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 you are correct that logically, if you presuppose an all powerful god, then there is nothing which is not possible. However, given there is no conclusive evidence for this being existing, this presupposition is unwarranted. The "historical evidence" is a small selection of hearsay accounts. We do not consider this convincing evidence for miracle claims of other contemporary, or even more modern, people. You asked for a better hypothesis. Paul provides one which does not rely on the presupposition of an unevidenced supernatural entity, it simply uses known and understood naturalistic phenomena and provides an adequate naturalistic alternative, therefore not violating occam's razor. This is what you asked for in your clip.

@@kage5162 start by examining the gospels. Manuscript/archaeological evidence, textual criticism, and please by all means read them.

The bible ultimately all leads up to Jesus and that alone is 1600 years of scriptures. Outside of the bible archaeology is proving it's words every day. So far archaeology has proved the existence of 53 bible characters as well as places and events. Up until recently the Hittite people were only ever mentioned in the Bible but now their existence has been confirmed. In Genesis it claims that God destroyed Sodom by fire and brimstone from heaven. Archaeologists have since found sulphur balls in the ruins. As for Jesus , he fulfilled 351 prophesies from ancient scriptures. The probability of any person fulfilling 8 historic prophesies is 1:1,000,000,000,000,000,000.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132theres also tons of evidence that god did not create this world (big bang) and how we originate from apes and that is called the human evolution btw. each to their own in beliefs but theres no evidence suggesting god and jesus exist except from the bible (which doesnt mean jack) ur out of luck bud

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 that's all stuff literally created by previous generations centuries ago. the same people who would believe a modern smartphone is magic. that is not at all evidence and is just hearsay. if you want to believe that, that's absolutely fine, but until there is hard unrefutable evidence, don't be telling others to believe it.

@@lordronn472 yep religion is guilty, but Jesus is 0% guilty for it! He never taught anyone to go force convert people or kill them!

@@richardstott9135 I believe in only one God silly goose.

@@sjayne27 thank you!

You didn’t watch the video, did you? Point out one place where that’s what Jesus taught his followers to do. Read his words. There are true Christian’s, you just don’t want to believe it.

@@slickmcCool the whole point of the video was that anyone oppressing their fellow human beings is not being a true follower of Christ.

@@Elias-sn8pz me too! Praise the Lord!

Jesus teaches us to baptize in the name of the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit. Do you believe in modalism?

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 No, I don't believe in modalism. I believe that only the Father is God and that Jesus is God’s Son. 1 Corinthians 8:6 states, “For us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live.” Only the Father is referred to as Almighty God in the Bible and he is identified by the name YHWH, which is usually translated Jehovah in English. (Psalm 83:18) God is the one who raised Jesus from the dead, exalted him, and made him Lord (Acts 2:32-36), giving him all authority in heaven and on earth. (Matthew 28:18)

@jollyrancher521 Jesus took that name upon Himself in John 8:58 and they tried to stone Him for blasphemy.

@jollyrancher521 how do you explain Jesus saying “Destroy this sanctuary and in 3 days I will raise it up?” He says it’s Him who raises Himself. Interesting correlation there. He claims to be the same God who raises Him up.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 In John 8:58 Jesus is not declaring himself to be God. Some believe Jesus is making an allusion to Exodus 3:14 where God says, “I AM THAT I AM,” according to the King James version. But Jesus did not use that expression. He used the Greek expression “ego eimi” (“I am”), which was a common phrase used by several people in the Bible. For example, in John 9:9 the man who Jesus cured of blindness said “ego eimi”, affirming that he was the one cured by Jesus. In Acts 10:21, Peter used “ego eimi” to say, “I am the one you are looking for.” In John 8:58, Jesus is simply saying that he existed before Abraham. “Before Abraham was born, I am.” (Koine Greek does not distinguish between upper and lower class letters as if "I AM" were a title.) Other translations translate this verse to more proper English: “Before Abraham was born, I have been” or “I existed before Abraham was born.” The Jews wanted to stone Jesus for claiming that he had seen Abraham, which in their eyes was blasphemous. In John 8:57 they said, "You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?" Jesus responded by telling them that he existed in heaven before Abraham was born. Verses 54 and 55 show that Jesus wasn't making any claim to be God. He said, "If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, of whom you say, 'He is our God.' But you have not known him. I know him. If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and I keep his word."

@@christopheryurkiewicz7395 yes the inquisition as well.

You don’t think Deuteronomy is calling the prophesied messiah who fulfilled the messianic prophecies all over the Old Testament a false prophet are you? Jesus is clearly not, he predicted the destruction of the temple and persecution of Israel by Nero, that happened. Fulfilled prophecy. The Messiah was supposed to come before the temples destruction. He also predicted his own resurrection. Jesus is the messiah.

@@mariahouliaras6713 Pray always 🙌

@@SpiderMonkey400 Paul speaking- ”persecutions, and sufferings, such as happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra. What persecutions I endured, and out of them all the Lord rescued me! Indeed, all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted. But evil men and impostors will proceed from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. But you, continue in the things you learned and became convinced of, knowing from whom you learned them, and that from childhood you have known the sacred writings which are able to make you wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.“ ‭‭2 Timothy‬ ‭3‬:‭11‬-‭15‬ ‭

@@SpiderMonkey400 thank you very much. Great references! Please consider subbing I don’t mind you tossing a comment up anytime you’d like!

I'm sorry to see that you feel like speaking this way to me after watching this video. I want you to know Jesus loves you. I want you also to know that from a historical standpoint there are some issues with your statement. Also regardless of any myths that hold similarities to the life of Christ, it is not detrimental to the life of Jesus being true. Jesus's life is a historical fact, and I believe the gospel accounts. The early church who were taught by the disciples unanimously believed the authors were who they were. There was no question about it. There still isnt. It is evident from a historical standpoint that the gospels were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 the Bible itself says the authors are unknown again you’re lying

@@Justmekpc I wouldn’t accuse you of lying can we be civil please. Maybe I’m mislead? If so then go ahead and show me. Can you give me any references in or outside of the Bible?

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 do you believe Mohammed split the moon in two as well or only your fairytale? Notice we have dozens of stories of people rising from the dead that all stopped when cameras were invented 🤣🤣 The Bible claimed all the tombs opened and the dead wondered the streets yet there’s no first hand accounts of that happening either and there are lots of Roman writings from that time Now why did god screw up his creation so bad that first he flooded the world which never happened Then second he sacrificed himself to himself to forgive his creation of sin he created? You’ve never really taken a good look at just how stupid the entire premise is have you?

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 simply google are the authors of the gospels unknown and you’ll see Most all religious scholars agree they have no idea who wrote them and they were written 50-100 years after Jesus so it’s all hearsay

You're just ignoring the fact that ancient biographies didn't include authorship internally, and you're just ignoring that the early church unanimously believed the authors to be Matthew Mark Luke and John. From a historical standpoint they are CLEARLY written by their given authors.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 I wouldn’t call the 180’s AD early relative to the lives of the apostles. And I wouldn’t say it’s obvious that they spoke Greek, let alone could read & write Greek.

@@jimurban5367 it’s extremely early and some of their teachers knew and were taught by the disciples.

@@jimurban5367 Matthew was a tax collector who wouldve had to be literate and speak Greek, Paul and Peter and other disciples preached in Greek speaking places like Athens and Rome, Jesus spoke with a Roman Centurion, etc.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 No, it’s not early. It would be like somebody today ascribing authorship to a nameless document from the 1940’s that was written about events that took place in the 1870’s, but without the rigorous methods and technology that scholars use today.

I don’t think there is any evidence to support that claim. It is alleged in the writings of early church fathers that Matthew may have been originally composed in Aramaic but that’s it.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 There is evidence and it is confirmed by Hebrew styles of writing that would have been lost to the greek translation, but could not have happened if going from greek to hebrew. Matthew was written to Jews, by a Jew, in fact they all were (except maybe Mark), so it doesn't make sense that they would write in their second language and not in the language of the Jews.

@@thisplaceisazoothey’re all written by unknown authors 50-100 years after the fact so there’s no reason to claim they are accurate

@@thisplaceisazoo any links? I'd like to look into that more.

hebrew didn't even exist in its modern form until around 400. Greek was the Lingua Franca.

@@73NF14Ret thank you!

How does that contradict traditional authorship? What does it have to do with the names of those who wrote the Gospels? And why do you think the numbers are a contradiction? Couldn't Jesus have sent out 12 at one point, and 70 another time?

@@4_years_left Traditional authorship simply had no basis, only Mark was compiled 20 odd years after jesus' death, the others are very very improbable to be traditional, and john is basically fanfiction. The synoptic gospels show more evidence of matthew and luke having much content sourced from mark. It is often down to the phrases, down to the word. That plus the hypothetical Q source has grounds in reality, not traditional authorship

@@Gee-Sus-Official ohhh you must've gone to Bible college and got that wacky noodle nonsense degree. I've heard all that, it doesn't hold up if you consider why the tradition view is tradition.

​@@4_years_left Notice how you don't disprove me ;) because you cannot

@@Gee-Sus-Official No, it's just I don't care to get into it with you, I mean you simply said "the traditional authorship had no basis" and didn't offer any proof to back up that claim, you're just parroting what your dumb Bible college instructors told you. Though, to be honest, I'm not sure what difference it makes. There are people who believe that the earth is old, or that there is a 7 year tribulation coming, and a silly secret rapture, none of those things are true but they still believe Christ died for their sins and are forgiven even in their continual ignorance. 🤷‍♂️

No, it’s called cognitive behavioral therapy. Turning your mind a positive direction, counting your blessings, praising God. It’s pretty effective. May God bless you and may you be a blessing to God all the days of your life!

​@@anewwaywithnoah1132You haven't mentioned anything about psychology, CBT or mental disorders in the video. Only that there's some research into the effects of being grateful. Blanket statements are not helpful to people with anxiety, depression or just general life stress. There are many valid reasons to be stressed out. Just saying "but god" is not helpful. If it's helpful to you that's fine, but piggybacking off some piece of research to promote your religion is just slimy.

I’m telling about CBT without saying CBT. Why is that a problem.

I’m certified in CBT and I’ve been blessed to have applied CBT in professional work environments in the past with both children and adults.

@@anewwaywithnoah1132 that's great, good for you, then why are you being a preacher tho

@@benjaminmarin9404 thanks for the encouragement. I could use it because I too often fall short of following it very well.

This whole video is literally about the tangible evidence that was good enough for Sir William Mitchell Ramsey. Did you not watch the video before commenting silly goose?

And im not going for the Jesus look in order to do that I would have to dye my hair black and my skin brown.

So are many people you deem historical figures, but the difference is there is more evidence for Jesus than any other person from antiquity. Examine the evidence!

@@jcdock no. Faith is based on evidence.

@@jcdock go ahead and check out some videos on my channel so you know what I’m talking about.

@@OceanusHelios the Bible is not a science book, there is no science in it. Logically, it follows that if a supernatural God exists then miracles can happen. What do you think happened to Jesus? Was his body stolen? Did the disciples hallucinate?

The idea that christianity is un-scientific comes from the idea that there is no power above the laws of the universe that can be found through experiments, which is an idea that has no evidence supporting it.

​​@@anewwaywithnoah1132 You went from unlimited polytheism (i.e. pantheism) that renders every particle into a god vs trinitarianism that limits it to three. Believing God became a man and then complaining about the olympics being blasphemous is delusional. Because christianity is ascribing to God what it denies for the woke. If the olympics said: "Hold on now, are you saying that men changing their natures to women is blasphemous but believing God becoming a man is not?" What would you say? You throw stones at people who recently doubted the nature of man, while christianity has been doubting the nature of God for 1700 years, saying: "Is he fully God or fully man?" Then Muslims ask them: "Are you saying that God was killed and defeated by His own creation on a cross?" The christians reply: "No, he was in his fully man mode." Then the Muslim replies: "So was he lying to the audience when you say that he was claiming to be God?" Either they believe God was defeated and thus ungoding God into a non-god. Or that their god was a conman who was claiming to be God while just being fully human.

Atheists are naturalists who believe in a similar doctrine as the At-Tabi'yeen (naturalists) of the past. Those in the past argued with Muslims while christians were busy with the stakes. They said: "The four elements (air, water, earth and fire) created the world, and that these elements were nature itself." They were probably just summarizing the four stages of matter: air = gas, water = liquid, earth = solid and fire = plasma. They probably got this from the jinn because all the gods of pagans are jinn who lived on earth before mankind. Anyways, the Muslims asked them: "How can something that has no life create beings with life? How can something that has no knowledge, create beings with knowledge?" The only reply for them would be to say that mankind is the very manifestation of the particle gods that rendered itself into a living, knowing entity composed of matter. And thus the particle gods become ungoded and unable to produce the universe once it turns into a man, similar to the christian god who becomes unable to create once he becomes a man. So contemporary atheists just replaced the four elements with the periodic table and the four forces, gluon, photon, w & z boson and graviton (gravity). That is not science or critical thinking, it is polytheism in Lordship. Polytheism in worship is where most of mankind erred. Meaning, they believe in God as the Creator but they do not worship God alone, they invoke saints, men, idols, angels do acts of worship like offering, sacrifice and vowing to others besides God. Whereas polytheism in Lordship, is to replace God as the Creator, Regulator, Sustainer and Maintainer of the world with nature, the universe, particles, stardust, emanation (neoplatonism), or the pharaohs etc. Most humans did not err by committing shirk (polytheism) in Lordship (Rububiyyah), because the Fitrah (innate natural disposition) created by God in man rejects it. When the plane is about to crash, or the kid had an accident, they invoke no one but Him who created and controls everything for help at that time, and all false deities vanish. But once they are safe in the land, that is when they fabricate the shirk (polytheism). And thus calamities will not cease to hit them, until it humbles them. If it does not humble them, nor act as a u-turn sign for them, but instead every pleasant worldly thing that they covet is opened up for them, then their torment is being restored for the Afterlife. But if calamities reach them, then the chance to rectify them is still there and they only need a reminder.

@@Ibn_Abdulaziz1405 either Jesus/the disciples were crazy, liars or they were telling the truth. I believe Jesus is who He claimed to be. He is God humbling Himself in order to save humanity.

@@RathanaelBasanjos amen

Jesus clearly didn’t like it either but that was how God chose to show us He loves us and saved us.

Also, I don’t think it was a true story, just an illustration of what God did by His act of love on the cross. And amen brother I’m glad we can speak freely.

*Payed for your sin so you can be reconciled to God*!!!

Thanks yea I agree neither the mythical nor the hallucination theory make sense. The miracle of Jesus resurrecting from the grave (not to mention His miracles before His execution), don’t make logical sense either, but when examining the historical evidence it logically follows that Jesus and His many miracles actually happened! Thank God for Jesus, hosanna!