Video

Strange grating sounds at beginning. Has Timothy got Eric locked up in a crate, like in Game of Thrones?

This is the nerdiest podcast names and I LOVE it. Too bad I only now found this and it’s cancelled 😢

When I combine the near enough mathematical TOE, namely string/M theory, with my ÆPT description/understanding of what is going on, then I find myself having gotten hold of/an understanding of 'everything' with a FOOT-hold/Foremost Overview Of Truth.👽

Penrose is S tier, for sure

Whatever

So you guys skipped over one thing, so he claims they erased his records at los alamos but an employee found a directory, of a year that he claimed to be there, that had his name. He also took george knapp there and walked him around the place.

Corbell is just the worst and that movie of his on netflix is the most overblown self important shite i have ever suffered through.

FIX YOUR FUCKING AUDIO

No one cares about this two clwms

Tim based his premature response on Eric's 2013 Oxford Lecture where the slide of the Fermionic Field Content clarified that Eric was basing his _Unified Field Theory_ on a gauge group of U(64, 64) Weyl spinors which can only be arrived at through the decomposition of a structure group of U(128, ℂ) Dirac spinors which came from a Spin(14, ℂ) spin group which was the complexification of the Spin(14) spin group where 14 is the cardinality of the unrestricted set of dimensional measures of the purely mathematical 4 dimensional psuedo Riemannian manifold Eric starts off with. Spin(14, ℂ) becomes symmetrically split into Spin(7, 7) so: GEOMETRIC UNITY DIAGRAM Z⁶⁴·⁶⁴ the Rules of the Game ⇡↓ π₂ Y⁷·⁷ the Observed the single unified field ω is a pervasive exitation on Y i⇡↓ π₁ here i⇡ is the engine of Observation within the Observerse X¹·³ the Observer where this i⇡ is the deformation of squished space-time which is gravity here ↓ π₁ is the projection operation which pulls back a partial sample from the Observed where all phenomena are aspects of a single unified field named omega dancing on Y⁷·⁷ hosted at every point by U(64, 64) Weyl spinors where H¹·³* x V⁶·⁴ → C(Y)⁷·⁷ represents a Horizontal vector space H¹·³ being hinged up to meld with the Vertical vector V⁶·⁴ space to form the gauge group of U(64, 64) Weyl spinors within the "Chimeric Fiber Bundle" C(Y)⁷·⁷ the double cover of the Frame Bundle of the gauge group U(64, 64) is U(128, ℂ) i.e. Spin(1, 3) x Spin(6, 4) → Spin(7, 7) → U(64, 64) Weyl spinors → U(128, ℂ) Dirac spinors Here Spin(1, 3) includes the Lorentz group L = Sl(2, ℂ) as a non-compact group which yields our X¹·³ space-time. Here Spin(6, 4) is isomorphic to the _Grand Unified Theory_ created by Jogesh Pati and Abdus Salam Spin(6, 4) ≅ SU(4) x ( SU(2) ‎ ‎x ‎ ‎ SU(2) ‎‎) ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ᴸ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ᴿ This _Pati-Salam model_ has quantised fields that have Left handed and Right Handed spin which can be thought of as waves or as particles. This makes this model P-symmetric and this means that there are extra Right Handed spin fields which are on the slide of the Fermionic Field Content If you watch _A Portal Special Presentation- Geometric Unity: A First Look_ from the timestamp 2:08:35 you see the slide of the Fermionic Field Content Spin(7, 7) is the unification of Spin(1, 3) and Spin (6, 4) as a single field named ω (omega): ω = (( ε, ϖ ), ( ν, ζ )) Bosons, Fermions where ( ν, ζ ) includes Eric's prediction of exotic Rarita-Schwinger Spin 3/2 Fermionic fields Here these Rarita-Schwinger Spin 3/2 Fermionic fields appear as the subscripts to the Q terms within the complex and these contribute to Dark Matter. This slide appears within the transcript of the 2013 Oxford Lecture, and appears typeset on page 51 of _Geometric Unity: Author's Working Draft, v. 1.0_ Timothy Nguyen admitted to Brandon van Dyck that he knew that Eric Weinstein was about to publish his draft paper, but went ahead and published his premature response to a vdieo of an eight year old lecture he did not attend, and therefore was unable to ask clarifying questions at. Tim mischaracterised, misunderstood, and misrepresented Eric's work. He critiqued it on the basis that Eric should have complexified his U(128) gauge group, only to then claim that U(128, ℂ) had problems, yet Eric had decomposed this gauge group into U(64, 64) as evidenced by the slide of the Fermionic Field Content which he would have prepared before the lecture.

Maybe come up with a podcast on why you can’t get any pussy. You literally dis a guy who can’t remember a meaningless college professor’s name 30 years ago when you can’t even remember people’s names for this story that you recently researched for this important analysis!!! Hello, non pussy getting guys…..

You two “bros” need to study up more on wtf you are talking about before you spew your uninformed guess on anything related to this topic. Not sure how I landed here which makes me hate youtube algorithms even more….read up a little, assuming you can….cheers bros

Ted Kaczynski was the Unibomber not Timothy McVeigh.

결국은 우리는 우리의 설계도와 아이디어를 깨닫고 선택을 하겠죠....죽음도 삶도 넘는 그 너머의 삶

You have nothing on Terrence Howard

I’m here for Joe Rogan talking about Niang Li and her theory of modifying Gravity plus her mysterious death

This was truly fantastic. Jonathan's explicative talents are incomparable and your style (both together) is clear and laid-back which comes as a welcome counter-balance to Jonathan's innate enthusiasm. Thank you and I look forward to more!

You audio is trash,

Solving the EFE in 11th grade is wild

Yeah, we said your name. You just didn’t hear it. Lol

She's one of the best teachers I've ever seen ❤️

You guys are physicists ? You don't talk like academics. You're far too cool. You sound like gangsters lol. Sean Carroll would have a heart attack if he came here (he's a famous physicist if you don't know)

Noone has commented in 7 months at the time of writing and then out of nowhere youtube recommends me it. When watching this, keep in mind that their not really trying to teach you anything.

As far as I know, the Germans were ahead of the allies when it came to rocket technology towards the end of World War Two. The US scooped up the top Nazi scientists after the defeat of Germany. Wernher von Braun being one of them. He was an aerospace engineer and a key figure in the development of NASA and the space program during the Cold War. And regarding Corbell, it’s just my personal opinion of course but for me he’s as reliable as a chocolate teapot 🫖

Ah sick. I dig you guys. I’m also physicist/experimentalist, although I no longer work in physics, this is the kind of stuff I’m looking for. I don’t have enough buddies that know physics that can talk shit.

Can you post links to the videos you put up plz! 🙏

Only 2 guys were put on reverse engineering the engine? Ya sure, BULLSHIT. PERIOD. 8 guys to fix a pothole though, ya. Tattoo beard guy is obviously a con, cmon people. Selling books and cheap TV specials.

Why would he lie all these years? What about all these highly credentialed people coming out with very similar stories? How could he have known what he knew in 1989 without direct exposure to it?

He's lying through his teeth...never seen someone more unconvincing

Jeremy and Bob are professional liars. BL worked at Los Alamos as much as me.

Eigenbros podcast! ☺☺

The open conjecture is whether ER=EPR.

these guys need more subscribers. I am now one :)

This guy sounds like he just graduated last week reciting from a textbook

Raoul Bott wasn't Eric' advisor but it was put on documentation. Eric is clear about that.

How many times is this dude gonna say he didn't write something down? Its annoying. Be prepared or get off the show

Bob is a known liar get real. Foesnt even have a degree in physics. He is a pimp owner brothels and took care of that instead of doing research.

Get to the fkn point

I had high expectations for you guys. But with both of you constantly cackling like giddy schoolgirls, it was difficult to discern any logical train of thought.

Who owns those patents? That's who will be in control of this technology.

This is amazing

CIG Theory has new comments in the "Comment" section. CIG is the new Physics behind UAP propulsion. Try learning CIG Theory. As a snapshot: To entice you to study up on CIG Theory, the following is what the Theory purports to accomplish: 1) Solve/resolve the confusion surrounding the Double Slit experiment and place it's solution on a firm ground with reality 2) Offer up that new found reality 3) Redefine matter; Redefine Space 4) Combine the fundamentals 5) Bring back a cohesive concept of Conservation of Energy as regards Dark Energy and the accelerating Universe 6) Offer up a new science of pressure 7) Explain Dark Matter 8) Explain Dark Energy 9) Offer a solution to the Horizon Problem 10) Offer a solution to the Core-Cusp problem 11) Offer a solution to the Mott Problem 12) Offer a solution to Quantum Tunneling 13) Offer a coherent explanation of Red Shift anomalies 14) Provides for a Theory of Quantum Gravity 15) Provides for the distinction between the Classical World and the Quantum World 16) Redefines the Correspondence Principle 17) Offers up a quantification of an atomic mass unit and it's potential spatial quantity 18) Maintains consistency with the idea of Quantum Decoherence 19) Maintains consistency with the idea of Superposition 20) Explains why the Universe is Accelerating 21) Explains 'Why" E=mc2 22) Explains "why" large things are large and small things are small 23) Offers up a solution to the Neutrino mass problem 24) Provides a solution to the Measurement problem 25) Expands on the concept of Virtual Particles 26) Provides a new and dynamic view of the Night sky 27) May explain Sonoluminescence 28) Contains & maintains "Black Holes" within the theory 29) May provide insight on entanglement 30) Contemplates all permutations of all fundamentals in one "Conceptual Equation" 31) Redefines Einstein's Field Equation in terms of the "=" sign, as opposed to a proportionality only 32) Maintains consistency with relativistic theory 33) Is based on sound logic 34) Vacuum Catastrophe 35) More

I have always wanted to believe him so badly! I find it exciting and fascinating every time new “proof” of extraterrestrials comes to light. However, I have always found him to be dishonest and a huge disappointment to the entire cause.

Obviously. So many lies. Joe rogan is a dumb ass too

He’s a liar. Sorry but wanting it to be true doesn’t make it true. If you tell a lie for 30 years, it becomes believable by the one invoking the lie.

This asian lesbian is wrong

I'm guessing that area S4 was used for whatever misinformation and counter intelligence campaign they were working on at that time. Area S5 I believe was used for filming scenes used for broadcast during the moon landing missions.

Bob has no need to lie, he has never made money from this, that’s not to say he might not be now but, Bob has always said, he doesn’t care if anybody believes him or not!!

bobs followers are zealous and will try to come up with a new excuse for everything. i think bob comes off as a normal polite guy. but its so weird to see people getting so defensive when any of of their ideas are held to smallest amount of scrutiny becuase they cannot provde any results. it seems so obvious that they just WANT these things to be true because its fun and exciting, and it is. but there is just nothing of substance on their side. no issue with them just talking about it for fun but when they start defending things and coming of with excuses, i feel like thats too far

Please do more videos on UAPs !