Video

Thank you sir ,harekrṣnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

01:54 - aren't you actually letting air back into the interior as the vacuum had already removed the air from the inside?

why??

The earth is flat I knew it. Dome life.

I just love bro teaching so much

وين الموهوبين😂

Sir please answer my question, When two objects are in thermal equilibrium, do they have ....same temperature same inetrnal energy... Or both?

Anyone tell me what is the name of the round rod

parker looks like justin bieber

now I need to pee

Simply Excellent

If the surface of both the balls are same (very smooth) then why the plastic ball will move slower in air ??

WATCHED.✔

Brian: “Why are you saying it like that? Why do you put so much emphasis on the “H”?”

Hey thank you so much! I don’t know what exactly I’m looking for so if someone could help me with search terms? I have chronic pain, no core strength, and I believe things are shifting that contribute to me having less balance. I love to bounce, squat, dance, swing around, anything like that. I have even more fun experimenting with the fluidity of my body when I’m drunk and am not held back by my pain :P I would be more flexible if pain didn’t hold me back too :) I just want to find more activities that I could do that have the same feeling

Great lecture series, thank you!! I had some initial confusion which resolved itself - may be worth sharing with fellow learners. I was thinking, even if the train moves at a constant velocity (hence in an inertial reference frame) and the traveler observes a free falling object - detached from the body of the train - in front, then it will appear to be coming towards him. On further thought, the distinction is the following. In the above description, the mass is initially kept attached to the body of the train till being dropped. So, in the constant velocity scenario the mass has already acquired the velocity of the train, so the traveler inside will observe it to be falling straight down upon being dropped. However, in the acceleration scenario (non-inertial reference S), he will still observe the mass to be rushing towards him upon being dropped.

who all are here after gaurav gupta sir's lecture like me😂😂

This is really helpful. Thank you so much

You can't really appreciate the peak or positive waves because the background is of the same color as the string, genius. Other than that, it's awesome.

One problem I am struggling to wrap my head around, is why a 60W bulb glows brighter than a 100W when wired in series, specifically. Our prof made us do this experiment, but the explanation is still unclear to me. Resistance is greater across the 60W....but why would that make it burn *brighter* ?

now i understand the concept, thank you so much sir

Parker is still and more noticeable than the moving string 😂

Thank you so much sir that's why i am subscribing you

This is the best way to learn. Love this.

Who is here of class 10😂😂

Looks like the sound is when whip hits floor

Hi Dr Edwards, was wondering why align the side of the Seestar? Would you not align the base plane instead like mounting it on an equatorial wedge ?

Bro looks like Ryan Gosling

Masked waz here.

black people should not watch this

where can i find the instruments

I'm a mechanical engineer and I've heard this many times being in India. When temple bells ring, I've noticed this a lot and have wondered what was that wahwahwahwah sound ! And here I get an answer, just amazing. No f**king teacher (not being disrespectful but just an emotional thing), all my life taught me behaviour of Beats phenomenon in real life. I bow to you!

The dumbell is exercising a different force. As it moves closer to the center of rotation it moves faster. A similar thing happens when figure skaters pull their arms in while spinning.

Ashwin choudhary was here

Professor can you suggest physics books for self study and question practice

thermal expansion of matter

I want the process of making an experimental device

So why is the power supply chattering ? Is that a charge/discharge cycle we're hearing. ? Something like a flyback transformer on an old TV that is arcing where it shouldn't be...?

Does this tube emit X-rays or other high velocity particles that penetrate a human's carcass and sterilize him ? In high school (1978) I found something similar in a science closet. All it needed was power. Went home and asked my Dad about it. He grabbed the phone and started making some demands to the admin folks and professors to get that think away from stupid students. Many years later, we never did have any kids. Related? Don't know. don't care. Best wishes to all that avoided the Clot Shot. -- 5.22.24

thank you for being a good teacher, i can finally understand this now for my test

I don't like when teachers don't explain why the pressure is lower at that restriction point. The reason, why it's lower is because of the law of conservation of energy. The flowrate must remain the same, like he stated, and because of this, the velocity must increase to push the same amount of volume of fluid over time. But the increase of velocity has to come from somewhere, it cant just be created. This is the reason for the lower pressure. The pressure in this scenario is potential energy, and the velocity is kinetic energy. In order for velocity (kinetic energy) to increase pressure(potential energy) has to decrease. The potential energy (Pressure) turns into kinetic energy (velocity). Think of a full balloon, when it's full, it has lots of potential energy, and as you let air out, its losing that potential energy and turning it into kinetic energy. Hope this helps someone, I know it helped me finally understand this principle.

As a student in 6th grade in Iraq I would love to thank you you helped me alot in understanding this topic physics is one of my favorite subjects but sometimes I struggle to understand it because teachers in Iraq don't do their jobs in good way and education system in Iraq is so bad but I'm trying to do my best to pass exams because I really want to study medicine Wish you the best Thank you so much again ❤❤❤✨️

so helpful thank you. I just did my first stacked images with the seestar s5 and field rotation is definitely something that affected my long exposure.

video is still helping 7 years later thank you

SO thats how light sabers get their colour

Maximizing amplitude as a function of natural frequency w0 with driving frequency w held constant does indeed give w0=w. However, maximizing amplitude as a function of driving frequency w gives a value of w that is smaller than the natural frequency w0. This is difficult to see without actually doing the derivative, and setting it equal to zero.

I need to say this with a caveat because I could not do this experiment and film at the same time. Having said this, I think that I get the same results with an empty water tank turned upside down. That would mean air to air refraction. Could you confirm or infirm that? Thank you.

This whole situation makes me extremely uncomfortable.

Because comments were disabled on your other video about the Mormon rape carousel, I thought I'd just put you on blast here. Whatever you're doing is wrong

Nice vid! Thanks!