Video

So content creators are just going to stop using their phone...and pick up a $1700.00 camera? When I am looking at shorts and sadly TikTok video I am thinking... if only they used a S9. Their 30 second video would be so much better...lol. I thought you were suppose to tell us this was an ad for the Panasonic S9? ;)

Waiting for Sony upgrade 200-600 with new focusing system, hope this will be G Master series.

And about Aps-c mode in Sony ? Good days for all!

This is just wrong. It's disrespectful towards your viewers and biased beyond what is tolerable. I'm not gonna watch any if your videos again.

Great video! My biggest takeaway is that despite most people lauding Canon's color science I'm realizing that I much prefer the rendering of Nikon colors for skin tones and especially the red tones.

All of us have a Helios lens at home 😅. As I look at my Helios 44-2 Lens, this part of the video had me rolling 😂

Over $1500 for a camera with a coldshoe. That’s a non starter for me. Really, what the heck were they thinking?

Not very best side by side comparison :o( I`ve seen better here. Missing closer look on the pictures details, noise and bokeh has diferent distance from subject or focal length person is not equally big on them. Iphone is nearly twice more Mpix 48 Mpx. Yes I agree FF is FF. But you got this in your pocket every day with you with not so bad picture quality and low aperture. You can have PRO version with optical zoom.

The LUMIX photos are blown out highlights. I liked iPhone way better. Wow. The highlights in this video is blown out major too. Even on faces. Maybe smartphones aren’t so bad

I just liked that they’re comparing the S9 to an iPhone because that camera is such a piece of junk cripple hammered by panasonic that a phone is really the only thing it can compete with 😂

Folks that can't understand the difference between a photo from a smartphone and a FF camera aren't Real Photographers. Apple must be paying them well to state otherwise.

Photos from smartphones are a waste of time, their quality is terrible and they have huge limitations. Smartphones are very inconvenient to take photos with, you can't use an external flash, they're bulky, and they're bigger than a great camera like the Ricoh GRIII. Smartphone photos are plastic, lack of details, very poor dynamics, terrible distortions caused by very bad lenses, the only relatively useful ISO is 100. Do you ride bikes? So take a photo on the bike route. You may be surprised that one wheel is much larger than the other. Smartphone lenses have such terrible distortions. If I want something small to photograph, I take the Ricoh GRIII, which is smaller than any smartphone and takes fantastic photos. I would like to have nice photos from my holidays, so I never take them with my smartphone. I made the mistake of taking my smartphone on vacation once and I will never make that mistake again. These photos cannot be taken again. They were lost.

The video was purchased from Panasonic. But that doesn't make the S9 any better. Everything in the comparison applies to almost every other DSLM. Nice try, I hope Panasonic pays well? You're losing trust in your channel right now.

The SIZE of the SENSOR has NOTHING do to with the quality. A 24mp bayer sensor on Full Frame, and a 24mp 1 inch Sensor will give the same detail level given that the glass or lens is of the same quality. The reason the iPhone looks worse is because of its processing (Among other things) I'm surprised that someone shooting for over a decade will start of the video with such a big lie to their audience! Please do better and learn how sensors works i.e. its circuitry that affects dynamic range, Pixel density, how Camera arrays like Bayer, X Trans, Quad Bayer, Foveon affect effective resolution vs pixel resolution before stating such falsehoods

No matter how much money panasonic spent on advertising the S9, the product turned out to be unsuccessful.

Bs comparison what lens were used.

and if you have both....BOOM

I can't seem to justify the GFX from the A7rv. Base on this test the GFX should not exists. Why buy the larger sensor of GFX when they are basically the same with image quality. I know about medium format look and the GFX doesn't give the real medium format look from the 645. GFX is trash

Thank you for this straight- forward explanation of TTL. It seems very easy to become overwhelmed by settings in an unusual environment! This has made the process very clear and methodical. Phew! Many thanks! Regards, Jonathan 😊

One tip I've learned if you're using a delay timer in instead of a remote trigger on AV mode is TURN OFF ALL LIGHTS PRIOR TO DELAY TIMER. I assumed mt Canon would make the decisions at end of the delay, but shutting lights off mid delay for some reason effects the AV. Full manual works best, and manual focus.

The Panny smokes the G Master 50

I'd say at best, this is like comparing apples to oranges. The Z8 is purpose built for speed and high resolution, the Fuji is built for resolution primarily. For most people, the Z8 would be a more suitable, well-rounded camera for anything. I'd probably only say to get the GFX 100 series if you're doing landscape or commercial work or anything you know will be printed large for sure (that requires that many megapixels) but for most people, the Z8 will be plenty (after all, it's like 95% of Nikon's flagship camera in a smaller, cheaper body). The ideal solution, if money is no object, is to have a Z8, maybe a Z6 III or Zf, and a GFX 100 to cover pretty much everything one could possibly need. But that would be an expensive setup when you add in lenses for both systems.

From your comparison, it looks like the 33 Mp of the Sony compared to the 24 Mp of the Lumix are just a horse power number. It is simply amazing how good is the Lumix in stabilization, by far the best. Thanks for this nice review. Lumix is the clear winner.

The lack of a proper lens selection in RF mount made me choose the A6700 ! If someone chooses APSC it's not for being carrying RF full frame glass which are heavy, bulky and way too expensive ! You should test the A6700 with some Sigma or Tamron APSC lenses ;-) Even Viltrox has some amazing glass for that camera, the 27mm f/1.2 and the 75mm f/1.2 are brilliant ! I'm actually considering to buy a second A6700 !

Dude's name is JP Morgan.

Bravo fun & informative

What AF mode was the Canon R5 in when you did the AF test? Just curious.

Yes, focal length plays a roll in a subjects features, but angle in relationship to lens hight is just as critical. Compression is the key element of the longer lens, but angle is more critical. You really need to study your subjects facial features first before you do anything. Thats how you determine lighting and lens selection for your subject.

How I see, the lumix did better AF job, not the Sony, but it depends on the settings, both of them has great af, the Lumix AF a little bit faster.

Amazing and simple explanation of combining ambient and strobe lighting! Thank you!

The girl in doughnut costume is cute

How can anyone trust your findings when you're sponsored by one of the 2 choices?

😊

Alliyah respectfuly youre so beautiful. ❤

If Tamron made this 24-150mm f/4 constant aperture, I'd ditch M43 and go full frame right away. The Olympus 12-100mm f4 IS Pro is that's making me stick with Olympus.

I was struggling with the light reflection this evening And now I stumbled on this video But I don't have the hit back silver board

Great content JP. Every time when I come to this channel I learn something great to boost my photography skills and that's why this is one of my favorite channels. Love from India.

What light are you using?

85

This effect isn't a direct effect of focal length, it's associated with the distance from the camera to the subject. It is frequently associated with focal length due to the distances that these lenses are most frequently used at. At the same subject to camera distance, a change between focal lengths is optically analogous to a crop of the image.

I've seen this demonstration before but they did it where it was the same photo taken from multiple cameras almost all at once with sane lighting and stuff. That demo made it verry clear. This one, I cant tell at all, because everything changes from one to the next lol. It looks so convoluted.

lol next we’ll compare apples to baseball bats.

150 shot per battery? is that a pocket digital camera? in the business of killing their own product, no one can beat canon. it has superior autofocus, yeah but the camera out of battery LOL canon cutting so many things like the IBIS which is the z5 still has, the potentially budget cheap prosumer cam with dual sd card, and decent battery to at least trying to compete or offering the user some enjoyable time shooting.

Can't tell the difference because the lighting and angles are so different.

14:59 colors are much better in the Nikon

Man I REALLY want a fujifilm but Ughhh Fuji is making me buy a Sony.

Excellent video, guys. What camera was this recorded on. Thank you.

Now that Nikon Z6III is out, would like to see the comparison with the S5IIX,. I feel where the panasonic wins, apart from the stabilization and color (subjective) is the way it holds exposure/Dynamic Range. I think this is where it always trumps its Sony counterpart.

Thanks so much for this. I suppose I have trust issues which is why I never considered AI to cull or edit my photos. Now after your video I am considering this. I have spent years in Lightroom. I will look at the websites of Aftershoot and Imagen to learn what this looks like when the culled images are moved to LR. For example, I am curious if after the AI culling are all images (rejects and keeps) in LR with stars and / or color ratings, do I get to choose what ratings I want transferred to LR? You have provided me with a great first step into this process. Thanks again.

🎉