Video

Thank you for the input! I will use this advice in future videos to help with making them useful for education!

@@energyisfree Great video overall! Look forward to more.

I actually just invested in a very capable machine so I could continue these! Thank you so much for the kind words and encouragement!

Thank you so much! The single most essential transition any municipality can make is the transition to clean energy harvesters. Much respect and support from this side of the pond!

Of course I am! We have coincident life goals it would seem. Let me know what you have in mind.

Two words: Royal Rife. You’re so right!

I would very respectfully disagree. With a mixture of energy responsibility and sincere investment the math clearly speaks to renewables being able to meet humanities energy needs copiously and with excess to spare! It’s about development of non extortion based sources of energy! The sun isn’t going to run out any time soon.

I believe a lot of his writings have been classified or simply taken. They don’t want us to have them for many reasons.

I appreciated the scientific amplification! Thank you for taking the time to educate! As far as doing a video on your post… an interesting idea. It’s somewhat more political than I usually like to get here… but insightful and I do agree with the central premise. Our phones and the larger community of digital media is all programming. Skinner type programming and it has been for a very, very long time. Who is doing it and why? Uncertain but certainly the goal is power and control. Energy is kept expensive for power and control. The people are fed programming for power and control and the government of every western nation is getting more and more militant for power and control. Energy freedom is the first step in personal freedom. Everything else we can work on once they can’t turn off our heat.

@@energyisfree Thank you! Always happy to share knowledge with anyone who can appreciate it. I can appreciate your primary aim is to free people of the illusion energy is expensive and it is a worthy goal to achieve. My concern is not so much political. While there are undoubtedly some governments who try to control what people think and do with a militant like zeal and most (have to) do to some degree - i take that as the price we pay for living in massive numbers close together: too much personal freedom might result in chaotic anarchy. But this is not what i've seen happening around the Western world, and in my country particularly. It's not the governments, doing the mind control for power I worry most about - it's corporations who do it for the money! With the money they can buy the government they want! And with the ability to determine how and what the people think they can influence them to vote, or keep, the government more easily still, while also eliminating ideas of dissent. And we humans are happy to have our smartphones and laptops and televisions/radios controlled by six or eight major world conglomerates who now daily influence at least half of the world's people. (Largely unnoticed by us or our media). You can't have personal freedom of any kind if you are unable to think without daily programming. We can't unprogram our thoughts from our culture but we certainly could from our corporations - if we realise we need to! Hope your heat stays on brother... here in Aus heating is an entirely different proposition. Staying cool is sometimes the hardest thing. We see the world differently down here. 🙂

Yes! Precisely! You can learn everything about the man by reading his book, his articles authored in magazines of the day and his entire Colorado Springs notebook for research is available. The spark gap usually fires when the charge in the main tank circuit is enough to overcome the dielectric value of the air in between the gap. Then the plasma spark that forms bleeds off the energy in heat and light leaving the circuit to charge again. A Tesla coil sine wave has two combined oscillations. I think this is the circuit at one frequency and the rising and the other frequency is the rising and falling of how much energy it stores before discharge but don’t quote me on that. A Tesla coil is a ridiculously simple machine. That’s the beauty of his designs. Simplicity and resonance were his medium. And he made art.

If I understand the question and I apologize if I’m not right here but …. I believe he was using the negative charge in ground. He tended to use the ground as its own equipotential plate.

Not this specific patent, although I was working on something based on this idea in my basement with a magnetron. It’s probably best I had to stop.

I am entering a new production cycle, in fact, and I was looking for great ideas and that is one! First I will do the patent Nikola put out there for this purpose. Then I will be excited to begin a script and research into the idea and its feasibility. Are there any specific forms of radiant energy you wish to see discussed? Naturally solar will be broached for comparison but I get the idea of your question.

@@energyisfree awesome! I was thinking of using a simple sheet of metal in the air (insulated on the patent ) connected to positive side of a capacitor, negative to the earth. NT says the potential is great, means we could charge any cap to rupture. Nowadays we have super caps. Discharge cap into step down transformer and into super caps or batteries. I love caps!

Frequency, energy and vibration. Absolutely! It’s an amazingly beautiful universe. Thank you for watching!

Since the disturbance is purely longitudinal then it is neither bound to a conductor nor to the same hysteresis limit that EMF Light is at, making "FTL" communication and power transfer a completely possible reality. The removal of the Hertzian component is the missing key to long distance wireless power transfer and non time-lagged communication, it's called "Decausative Communication" and the governments have had it for a while now, last I heard it was under the name "LCC technology" with a max communication with a speed 20x that of EMF Light "speed", though I'm still looking into that. Imagine a slinky being the electromagnetic Hertzian disturbance we all know, it takes time for the disturbance to travel from 1 end to the other. A dielectric impulse displacement current is like a stick, push 1 end and the other reacts at the same time. It's that simple. If you'll recall from my earlier comments his work has nothing to do with the Schumann resonance, which takes place in our atmosphere between the Earth and the ionosphere: "Electromagnetic Hertz Waves Radiated Horizontally From Vertical Conductor, Slightly Affected By Conducting Earth Surface, Velocity V- Speed of light. ENERGY UNRECOVERABLE." The base frequency you'd want to multiply and divide with is 11.7Hz to 11.9Hz, that is the electrical impulse frequency of the Earth itself, the frequency may vary from 11.7Hz to 12Hz depending on the varying diameter of Earth, the higher the frequency the farther and more efficient the impulses will become. You can read more on the wavelengths and periods Tesla mentions in the following articles: "THE FUTURE OF THE WIRELESS ART" "INTERPLANETARY COMMUNICATION" "NIKOLA TESLA'S PLAN TO KEEP "WIRELESS THUMB" ON SHIPS AT SEA" "NIKOLA TESLA'S NEW WIRELESS" This frequency and displacement impulses are the factors needed to be accounted for when using the Earth as your wire. Peter Lindemann refers to these currents as an Electro-Radiant Event: Summary of The Electro-Radiant Event -The Electro-Radiant Event is produced when a high-voltage, direct current is discharged across a spark gap and interrupted abruptly before any reversals of current can occur. -This effect is greatly increased when the source of direct current is a charged capacitor. -The Electro-Radiant Event leaves wires and other circuit components perpendicular to the flow of current. -The Electro-Radiant Event produces a spatially distributed voltage that can be thousands of times higher than the initial spark discharge voltage. -It propagates instantaneously as a longitudinal, electrostatic "lightlike ray" that behaves similarly to an incompressible gas under pressure. -Electro-Radiant effects are solely characterized by impulse duration and voltage drop in the spark gap. -Electro-Radiant effects penetrate all materials and create “electronic responses” in metals like copper and silver. In this case, “electronic responses” means that an electrical charge will build up on copper surfaces exposed to Electro-Radiant emissions. -Electro-Radiant impulses shorter than 100 microseconds are completely safe to handle and will not cause shock or harm. -Electro-Radiant impulses shorter than 100 nanoseconds are cold and easily cause lighting effects in vacuum globes. In essence there are 3 critical factors that contribute to what type of phenomena you will get with Dielectricity, and they are controlled by: -The level of voltage. -The amount of impulses per second (volts per second). -The duration of each impulse. You could think of a Tesla Coil as an instrument and the Aether as its strings, how hard you strike (voltage), how fast you strike (cycles) and how long the string vibrates for (impulse duration) will give you different sounds, it's like that for the Aether and how it manifests phenomena. Altering these 3 details will give different effects, including altering the ambient temperature of the room the apparatus is located in, and this is the form of power the Tesla Coil was made to use. There is also a whole rabbit hole of the extremely powerful health benefits of Dielectricity, but this post is already getting too long, feel free to ask me questions on this if you have any. And this hasn't even touched of field propulsion... *What the Tesla Coil is actually for and what it's supposed to be* The Tesla coils used today are, quite frankly, a disgrace compared to what Tesla was actually doing with them, they are supposed to have a 3rd extra coil, series connected and wound in the opposite direction to the secondary, this is the 2nd missing component of the Tesla Coil and is the part responsible for allowing Tesla to achieve not just immensely high tension levels, but higher total power output availability than input, because the addition of a 3rd coil makes the circuit Asymmetrical, I will go more into this later. One of the most important things about it is that first, it keeps the coil outside the magnetic field of the primary and secondary, allowing it to freely oscillate when the series connected secondary is excited via very tight coupling with the primary coil, this free oscillation was part of what allowed him to obtain insanely high voltage levels of over 100 million volts in combination with as tight as coupling as possible between primary and secondary, unlike today where a compromise must be made with the 2 coil setup. The bucking coil nature of Tesla's circuits is also apparent in the opposite winding design, bucking coils usually take the form of a single coil that is first wound clockwise, and then half way through its direction is changed to be wound counter clockwise, this forces the magnetic fields to cancel out at the half way point between them and produces longitudinal disturbances in the form of a dielectric impulse without a magnetic component. Tesla's lab and coil design embodies this principle and hence the reason why the secondary is wound counter clockwise but the 3rd coil wound clockwise, the bucking coil design helps to suppress the magnetic component in the circuit further. The other essential thing to know is that the primary coil is excited via Dielectric induction using a Hairpin type circuit, contrary to established claims the hairpin circuit is not merely high voltage and high frequency electric pulses, the energy on the cold side of the circuit very little to no magnetic component, it is mostly dielectric tension/voltage set into motion little to no losses, and no losses means no magnetism, hence the reason you can freely touch the bare conductors. The Tesla coil was never meant to use magnetic induction as it is used today, it was meant to be induced with Dielectric Impulses: "Tesla stated that voltages could often be increased at an amazing 10,000 volts per inch of axial coil surface. This meant that a 24-inch coil could absorb radiant 24 2 shockwaves, which initially measured 10,000 volts, with a subsequent maximum rise to 240,000 volts! Such transformations of voltage were unheard with apparatus of this volume and simplicity. Tesla further discovered that the output voltages were mathematically related to the resistance of turns in the helix. High resistance meant higher voltage maxima. He began referring to his disrupter line as his special "primary', and to the helical coil placed within the shockzone, as his special "secondary". But he never intended anyone to equate these terms with those referring to magneto-electric transformers. This discovery was indeed completely different from magneto-induction. There was a real and measurable reason why he could make this outlandish statement. There was an attribute which completely baffled Tesla for a time. Tesla measured a zero current condition in these long copper secondary coils. He determined that the current, which should have appeared, was completely absent. Pure voltage was rising with each inch of coil surface. Tesla constantly referred to his "electrostatic induction laws", a principle which few comprehended. Tesla called the combined disrupter and secondary helix a "Transformer". Tesla Transformers are not electromagnetic devices; they use radiant shockwaves, and produce pure voltage without current. Each transformer conducted a specific impulse duration with special force. Therefore each had to be "tuned" by adjusting the disrupter to that specific impulse duration. Adjustments of arc distance provided this control factor. Once each transformer was tuned to its own special response rate, impulses could flow smoothly through the system like gas flowing in a pipe." -The free energy secrets of cold electricity by Peter Lindemann By hooking that circuit into the primary Tesla was able to excite, charge, and induct the entire circuit with dielectric impulse currents over the contaminated magnetic currents, without the Hertzian component these disturbances could travel far further with above unity efficiency when sent into the Earth, with proper tuning any number of devices can extract power from the original impulse without putting strain on the primary transmitter, making a self sustaining system very easy to accomplish.

*What Electricity, the Electron, and Light actually are* Electricity is NOT the flow of Electrons, but the conjugate of dielectric and magnetic fields, this is the model Steinmetz and Tesla recognized back then and were most certainly correct, when these 2 mutually destructive fields make contact they create "bumps" in the interacting fields, these bumps are what we call the Electron. The modern understanding of science has made it all unnecessarily complicated, Voltage is the Dielectric field and Amps are the Magnetic field, they both spin around the outside of the wire in opposite directions and not inside it, furthermore Electricity does not flow from positive to negative, but the opposite, when a charged capacitor is shorted the built up tension field between its plates releases and begins transforming into magnetic towards the negative plate from the positive plate, which travels along the wire from the negative and back to the positive. Imagine a water tank with a closed loop, if the water is forced from the tank through 1 end with enough force it will flow around to the other end, this is why Electrons flow in the opposite direction of conventional current. czcams.com/video/ACjsvpFZPK8/video.html You might be wondering why I keep using the term EMF (Electromagnetic Field) Light, the light we have here on Earth is NOT the same type of Light that exists in outer space, first I'll start with Light we know: “We have made sure by experiment,” said Mr. Tesla, “that light propagates with the same velocity irrespective of the character of the source. Such constancy of velocity can only be explained by assuming that it is dependent solely on the physical properties of the medium, especially density and elastic force." - Tesla Sees Evidence Radio And Light Are Sound EMF TYPE LIGHT: GEOMETRY: COAXIAL. Torsional Aether circuit Unlike a normal box, which when larger holds more, the nature of light is that the smaller the space the higher the energy and capacitance, in fact the spatial footprint of gamma is infinitely smaller than radio, infrared etc. Eric Dollard once said in a lecture that the magnetic was the “denial” of the other (dielectric), this is very partially accurate, but ICE is not the DENIAL of water, rather an attributional state of same, hence magnetism is the dielectric's extrinsic attribute. To put it simply, Light does not move from point A to point B nor does it travel or have a speed, it is an induction, a disturbance extremely similar to that of Water waves, a "Photon" is just the highest point of compression towards counterspace and intersection between the dielectric and magnetic fields of the circuit, while the opposite end is rarefaction like a wave that travels out from a drop in the water, this disturbance flows backwards and forwards in an AC co-axial circuit in circular motion, with the compressions and rarefactions being the magnetic transverse component of EMF Light. If the Aether is Water, Light is the droplet (photon, compression, dielectric) and ripple (rarefaction, magnetic, magnitude, space) when disturbed and if it rotated radially. However this is not the state of Light we have out in outer space, Light is especially interesting because it has 2 modes, 1 purely longitudinal as a displacement current and 1 with transverse EMF components. Before Light makes contact with Matter, including Earth's envelope, it exists as longitudinal disturbance without a magnetic component, as such it does not partake in magnitude or time, that is extremely important because it means 2 things: -The light from distant stars isn't light years old at all, it's instant, disturbances in the Aether only partake in time if it has magnitude/magnetism involved. -You cannot see the light from anything beyond Earth's atmosphere unless it's reflecting of a material object. This is why the Apollo astronauts never saw any stars when they left Earth: "We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the moon without looking through the optics, uh, I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the solar corona what-what stars we could see." "I don't remember seeing any..." czcams.com/video/BI_ZehPOMwI/video.html The way Armstrong turns to look at Collin is almost like "Why'd you have to say that?" in his body language. It wasn't until they installed diffraction gratings into the later shuttles and stations windowsills that allows the Light to be converted into EMF Light that we can see. You literally need the Earth to the Stars. Once Light makes contact with matter it is converted into EMF Light, which induces Heat and experiences time delay. NOTE: Light and Illumination are not the same thing, illumination being the visible extrinsic attribute of Light that illuminates matter. There's an 8 minutes clip of an interview with Dollard from years ago about this and the Sun, as well as a clip from the energy conference with Peter Lindemann "Visible Light Musings with Peter Lindemann" czcams.com/video/xCk5ZA6GcW0/video.html czcams.com/video/IlM9aQMlxPs/video.html *The Law of Conservation is critically flawed. Breaking the Symmetry.* The conservation is energy is heavily based on Maxwell's Symmetric equations, but it is incomplete, Maxwell wrote equations for both Symmetrical and Asymmetrical systems, but the latter has mostly vanished from public knowledge, Tesla was aware of these equations and designed his systems around Asymmetrical principles. By designing our electrical systems to be Symmetrical it is literally the worst possible system you could make, this includes both Motor and Generator windings, it forces the incoming power to return back on itself and it is the reason our systems are terribly inefficient producing waste heat and Back-EM Fields, a symmetrical coil circuit gives +1, -1, = 0 which keeps the COP at 1 or under, action and opposite reaction. It is the *STUPIDEST* circuit anybody could have possibly originated in powering systems. Tesla's extra coil made the system Asymmetrical to result in +1, -1, +1, = 1, action, reaction, and counter-reaction, this is another part of why the voltage sky-rocketed to over a hundred million volts when he added the extra coil, it wasn't just a conversion of amps to volts, but an increase in total available power because he had broken the symmetry. czcams.com/video/oRJVzJNr2Ks/video.html czcams.com/video/BEm6ZO7ukFY/video.html I highly downloading a copy of Tesla's "Rare Notes", they contain information on the magnifying transmitter not in the patent and show internal schematics of the towers coil configuration. Symmetry is the balance of geometry, Asymmetry is the imbalance, we're taught that the Cosmos is a closed, particle collision based, symmetric system, yet all of these "facts" are not in compliance with what nature consistently shows. The Aether's role in our dimensional universes existence demands it be open fundamentally, the currents of its movement govern the structure and behavior of atoms, and we have balanced Asymmetry all over the place. And it just so happens that Water is the most asymmetrical substance we know off, its most desired form of movement, the spiral, is a logarithmic spiral and like the golden ratio is asymmetrical. Our power generation methods need to be Asymmetrical as well to eliminate the problems we currently face besides a COP of under 1. Peter Lindemann has also covered this in a section dedicated to the conservation law and its problems in his book. I also I recommend starting with Asymmetrical motors (more accurately called Asymmetrical machines), YT and energeticforum.com are decent places for info on them, such as ufopolitics on YT, aboveunity.com is more dedicated to that type of topic, although they are still stuck in the atomist model of physics (electrons, photons, etc) and don't seem to be aware of dielectric induction, for whatever reason.

Asymmetry. Dielectric Displacement Currents. Resonance. These are your 3 key principles for Tesla's work and the keys to over-unity power production, all his work after 1891, including his patents, should be viewed from the perspective of Dielectric Induction over Magnetic Induction to truly understand them. All these factors combined creates an unbelievably efficient and powerful circuit, combine these 3 together and the possibilities are enormous, including the non-bound nature of these impulses where they don't need to be bound to a conductor, be it a wire or the Earth. Instant power and communication from anywhere to anywhere in the Cosmos. If you want to look more into some my sources for your own research and comparisons check out the sources below, none of the authors get everything 100% but I still consider them to be invaluable pieces to the whole puzzle, a few books I would recommend starting with are: "The secrets of cold war technology" by Gerry Valistos "The free energy secrets of cold electricity" by Peter Lindemann "The missing secrets of magnetism" by Ken Wheeler "A Common Language for Electrical Engineering: Lone Pine Writings" by Eric P. Dollard Some people (on YT and elsewhere) I also highly recommend checking out: Master Ivo Theoria Apophasis Fractal Woman Aaron Murakami Eric Dollard Peter Lindemann MTECH Industries (2 channels, 1 old), bonus video of a bulb outputting abnormal light levels without burning out: czcams.com/video/63eYXRltWUg/video.html

proof?

Thank you very much!

Easier said than done perhaps! But yes gravity would make it much, much easier. The only question then becomes where we get the energy to manipulate gravity! 😊

The Great state of Maine!

As warm water flows from the equator to the poles it cools and some evaporation occurs, which increases the amount of salt. Low temperature and a high salt content means high density and the water sinks deep in the oceans. The cold, dense water also moves slowly. Eventually, it gets pulled back to the surface and warms in a process called “upwelling” and the circulation is complete. This global process makes sure that the world’s oceans are continually mixed, and that heat and energy are distributed to all parts of the earth. This in turn contributes to the climate we experience today.

@@energyisfree thanks. So like a wind pressure from the ocean towards a landmass is the norm? And the opposite causes resistance? Why particular does it hug the coast until the arctic? Where it veers off? Is the proximity to landmass reliant on temperature

@@energyisfree thanks. I hardly ever get to talk like this. I learned all this in college but it's rotting away if I don't refresh

@@fasted8468 all my calculus is gone from the same phenomena. I miss linear algebra so much.

@@fasted8468 boundary currents might be an interesting read for you. Remember there is a serious differential between the depth of deep ocean currents and coastal shelving.

I hope to get to them all in time!

With this system, ideally, there wouldn’t be terrestrial radio broadcasts above ground. His idea was to move communications (and power) through the Earth which he describes as “responding to electrical current like a solid metal ball”. Multiple stations, complex frequency modulation. The ground plate, E, in the Wardenclyffe tower he built was a ground based electrode several hundred feet in circumference and over a hundred feet underground. Brooklyn Eagle Article, February 8th 1902…. “Inside the big tower a well 120 feet deep has been sunk, the well being 12 feet square, cased Its entire depth with 8 inch timbers, which will be finished off with brick and cement. A staircase, which will lead down into the well, is nearly completed. Transversely across the bottom of the well will be a series of four tunnels, each to be 100 feet long, and a force of workmen has begun work on these subterranean passages.” This gives you some idea of the structure below ground he had planned. Ideally tuned a Tesla coil wasn’t meant to arc. It was meant to conserve the charge as a large electromagnetic oscillator. Tesla mentions arcing as being wasteful because the moving charge was the goal. Much like an electromechanical oscillator would vibrate a physical structure Tesla believed an electromagnetic one could move the structure of currents in the Earth. Multiple stations required at resonance sort of like an electromagnetic Newtons cradle.

@@energyisfree It would have to be very low frequency to propagate through Earth making the high frequency resonant circuit unnecessary. Like 5G, high frequency isn't transmitted very far and does not penetrate through solids very far. I wonder how much power we can get from a 4G signal? I never tried to calculate it. It probably isn't much.

@@rayfleming2053 all true! The Tesla coil, however has an interesting feature of its sine function. Because it’s a resonant transformer even a coil that resonates at a high frequency will have a “beat” which is much lower frequency if tuned properly …. And Tesla must have spent most of his life tuning. If you look up the graph of a functioning coil you’ll see what I mean. And the peaks and valleys of that, with a system the size of his magnifying transmitter at Wardenclyffe, would be quite sizable in charge density. Tesla specifically states that the difference between his Wardenclyffe tower and a standard radio tower is that a radio tower emits 90+% as radiation and has relatively low current density whereas his tower is less than 10% radiant and 90% moving current. He’s not trying to send a signal he’s trying to “tap something” electromagnetic at a tuned frequency to get it resonating. Imagine how big a structure you must need to tap to make something capable of a charge that big? Tesla believed that the Earth already had currents flowing through it which could be set in motion…. And he verified his theories with his experiments at Colorado Springs. The ground for the coil at Colorado Springs was attached to a water main and nice and deep. I think a 4G signal would give you very little power. Thank goodness for that, I think it’s at 2.4 GHz or close in the upper band. If it was powerful enough to draw electricity from it would cook us like a burrito in the Microwave! My video on “was one tower enough” is a set of very rudimentary frequency simulations to play with the concept of his resonating earth idea.

@@energyisfree I'd like to add to the topic of Tesla Coils and the Magnifying Transmitter. From my research I believe Tesla Coils have the ability to produce far more output than input, and it's because of the resonance. I believe you can extract both high volts and high amps from the secondary without straining on the primary because the extra power is now coming from the resonance amplification in the secondary, as long as the rate of increase in the secondary is enough to produce more in the secondary than is drawn from the primary, higher output than input is completely possible. The input torque of an electrical generator would free spin freely and indefinitely if not for 2 things, Friction and the Backwards Translation of Load, in the form of a reverse magnetic field which forms as a result of the forward current, and which opposes the input motion. This reverse torque fighting the input torque requires more and more energy to be applied at the input to continue the ability for the extraction of energy at the output. Tesla spoke about this reverse current and reverse magnetic field, now called the Lenz Law. Tesla opposed the reverse torque natural occurrence, with the introduction of capacitors into an already inductive generator coil circuit. This is evident in the writing of Tesla's pancake coil patent. But more importantly, he invented resonant electrical circuits, the resulting oscillations that occur within the same capacitive / inductive circuits, which alternately transmits magnetic and then dielectric pulses, over time, which each passing electrical half wave, and influence other similar circuits with the same electrical resonant frequency. The key here is that these secondary circuits are forced into electrical oscillation without a backwards translation of load, so long as the frequency remains perfect on both circuits. In other words, if you can keep the circuits resonating while you extract power from the second circuit, you will be able to withdraw more energy from the output than there is needed at the input to keep the system running. Then you can loop a portion of the output to power the input continuously and indefinitely. This has been successfully done and demonstrated in the work of Don Smith of Texas USA, and Tariel Kapanadze, of the soviet satellite country Georgia. The configuration is Tesla's patent 645576, System of Transmission of Electrical Energy. The configuration is Resonant circuits that are connected via the dielectric field. A tesla coils is also capable of this, resonance takes what you put it and amplifies it beyond the input, because the source that provides that extra power outside the input is from outside it and unending, the Aether is non-Cartesian it doesn't have a limit, Eric Dollard calls it counter space, and this applies to both voltage and current, dielectric tension and magnetic amps. Furthermore, the law of conservation of energy doesn't apply at all, nor could it ever: "but as we've seen neither Maxwell's equations nor their solutions indicate the existence of a causal link between between electrical and magnetic fields. Therefore we must conclude that an electromagnetic field is a duel entity always having electric and magnetic components simultaneously created by their common sources." "according to these equations in time variable systems electrical and magnetic fields are always created simultaneously because they have a common causative source, the changing electrical current, once created the two fields coexist from then on without any effect on upon each other. Therefore electromagnetic induction is a phenomenon in which the field creates the other, I.E energy generation is an illusion. The illusion of mutual creation arises from the facts and time-dependent systems of the two fields appearing predominantly together" -Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields In layman's terms, this means there is no transduction of kinetic energy to electric energy, no kinetic movement gets transformed INTO electricity, into dielectric and magnetic fields, nothing ever has, a spinning generator only sets up the conditions for electricity to manifest, this throws the "law" out the window. Electricity comes from the conjugate of magnetic and dielectric fields as a generator "churn up the ether" as Tesla put it. If my suspicion is correct, a tesla coil that is in perfect resonance can forever pump out higher volts and amps as long as the resonance is perfect between the 2 coils, a small increase in power output of the primary should result in an exponential increase in the secondary. I'm working on a prototype that will let me test this by attaching thicker wires to the ends of the secondary to draw higher amps, strain on the primary can be avoided by either increasing the strength of the primary a little or using a very high frequency, I believe double conical shaped secondary coils would be good for that. Now for the magnifying Transmitter, I'm not entirely convinced Tesla was using high frequency for this one in combination with other towers because of the frequency required. Tesla was able to narrow down the electric frequency of the Earth to 11.772(8)Hz. I believe the magnifying transmitter was meant to act as the primary coil, and Tesla was using the Earth as the secondary coil. I imagine tuning it to 11.772Hz should have been easy to do without requiring other towers to interact with the primary. Alternatively, it is possible he was intending to use multiple towers for high frequency to create the low frequency of 11.772(8)Hz for the above mentioned reasons, unsure. Contrary to popular belief the Schuman Resonance has nothing to do with this either, because that frequency is related to oscillations in Earths atmosphere, Tesla determined this energy would be unrecoverable. In this case the magnifying transmitter would need to be on that low frequency to resonate with the Earth to induce the same effects as in a regular tesla coil, this also matches the analogy image he created. In effect, Electric power has never come from our universe, it has ALWAYS come from the Aether. The final result is a circuit that uses a power source to create a new power source that exceeds the original input, and that new power source is being induced from the Aether which has no limit, using resonance. In a Tesla coil the new OU power source is in the secondary. In the Magnifying Transmitter, the Earth itself is the OU power source.

@@JenkoRun it is an interesting idea that he wanted to use the Earth as the secondary. As I said above the coil has a beat which is lower in frequency than the coil resonance so perhaps this was goal. Turn the earth into a coupled oscillator. The real question from everything you said in my mind is…. How can you prove by experiment that more can come out than went in? You’re comment was amazingly detailed and I can see you’ve done a lot of research. Can you test your theory with experiment and if so…. How and when can we show the world because I would be only too honored to display that research on my channel, humble as it is. Let me know! I am quite serious. Anything that can be proven experimentally, however non intuitive, must needs be true if the experiment is properly conducted and repeatable with a solid data outcome. The sincerest form of peer review is the repetition of an experiment with a successful result.

So given what you just said you reminded me of a very interesting video by a Creator that I love to watch called Ray Fleming. He’s a retired physicist of some sort who has great issues with the current scientific establishment and his own ideas about things. czcams.com/video/ca0sOGg1w5k/video.html

Thank you for the comment and the kind words!

Very awesome show 🎉

It’s the most amazing show I’ve ever seen

I’ll try every approach I can! Thanks for taking the time to comment!

Thank you very much for the encouragement!

Thank you for raising these issues and asking these questions. Re: electrodes…. This is a case of reasoning by analogy fallaciously. For them to be electrodes actually, there would have to be proof that they were in fact intended to be electrodes or even used that way and thus far I have not seen one shred of evidence that they were anything but handles meant to allow a heavy block to be placed in an air vent to seal it. The experiments Dunn has performed assume a lot…. Not to mention that in the video I categorically disproved the idea that the pyramids contained electrolytic chemicals so the electrodes would be useless without wires…. There is no evidence of wiring of any kind and no evidence of any structure which would utilize the charge at the point of an electrode. The precision machining has been demonstrated by Scientists Against Myths on CZcams. They actually made a copper tube drill and used it to cut granite in a very reasonable time frame. Copper and sand are more than sufficient as an explanation for the cuts. There are also videos demonstrating copper saws…. As well as a visual drawing representation of craftsman rip sawing a vertical plank from the tomb chapel of the vizier Rekhmire’ at Thebes, 18th Dynasty. They had the technology to make such marks. It’s proven, documented and experimentally verified. Granite largely reflects sound. This is mathematically and experimentally verified by my video. If granite absorbed or transmitted sound the mathematical calculation of the resonant modes of the enclosed space in the Kings Chamber would be off. They were spot on. Granite, like most hard stone, reflects almost all sound. Again…. I am always open to contradictory evidence as my allegiance is to reason. Thank you taking the time to comment!

It was clearly pointed out in Christopher Dunn's video the burn mark under one of the electrodes but lack of burn mark under the other, consistent with an anode and cathode system. What would a handle even be used for here anyway? The doors in question don't exactly move up and down. As far as the Precision boxes and other objects, you're really trying to state that all of the measurements that have been taken of these things by World Travelers and scientist for the last couple hundred years that are nearly right at the limit of modern instruments ability to be able to measure, all of that is just nonsense? Not to mention that if Granite does not conduct sound, how is it doing that seemingly so well under use of things like ultrasonic Imaging? Clearly it seems to penetrate and conduct sound just fine at least for purposes of Imaging. All that seems to take at least as much faith as Christopher Dunns work in the first place.

To call them electrodes you must first demonstrate that they were attached to a source of electricity. This has been disproven and is not at issue. There was no source of charge nor anything to connect them to. I believe that they were handles which were used to place blocks meant to seal off an air shaft. How does one lower a block into a hole of the exact same shape and size without handles? That is immediately self evident when the placement of these blocks is seen in diagram. The question is not, “how could they build the pyramids and measured so precisely without modern technology?” The question is “how did they learn to measure so well?” And the answer is the same way we did. Trial, error, and ever more complex and correct math. I would be interested to see what you are citing when you talk about them imaging the pyramids with ultrasound. I would be willing to listen…. That would give us a mathematical basis to start from. IE depth of penetration, predicted sonic absorption vs sonic reflection vs measured…. There would be a host of things that could easily change my mind in a study like that if it is as you say. I would of course assess it critically but what imaging study are you speaking of?

@@mikesterling7694 We have no proof or evidence that any of the pyramids were ever used for power storage or electrical conductivity.

You should watch the video to the end to get your answer. I show, explain and read the translation of multiple inscriptions on pyramids and other tombs. I also explain the evolution of Egyptian building techniques over hundreds of years and demonstrate the progression from mastaba to pyramid. There is a great deal of evidence presented in this video as well as ‘pointers’ to places where you can look to learn more about the wealth of knowledge available on Ancient Egyptian monuments.

You showed one example and the translation you gave was that it said "essentially, this is a tomb"???

We have the journal of the overseer of the transport of stone used in the pyramids detailing not only the source of the stone which has been chemically proven to have been from that quarry but the schedule, the volume and the pharaoh they worked for. We have the autograph of a work gang with the name of the pharaoh who has been, since antiquity, written as the one interred there inside the relieving chambers in the great pyramid which would have been in accessible to anyone but the builders. All of this is in the video. Even if the inscriptions and copious writings by Egyptians and Greeks do not sway you…. If they aren’t tombs…. Why were pharaohs buried there? We have sarcophagi…. Which have no other purpose in any other tomb than to hold bodies. Sarcophagus means “flesh eating” in original Greek. It is a place to lay bodies. There are hundreds more sarcophagi in Egypt just like the one in the pyramid…. Many of them held bodies when they were found. You put sarcophagi in a tomb. I feel that you are intentionally ignoring the obvious answer supported by simple inference in favor of a much more elegant solution which is not necessary. There is no evidence, no records of, and no argument for the idea that pyramids were anything other than grand monumental tombs.

I would never censor anyone. I believe in the right to free speech and I have never deleted a comment. CZcams does that. I do this for the sake of the exchange of ideas…. And you raise some interesting points and I respect you for taking the time to make them. That being said…. A large part of my argument was either math…. Which is never flimsy evidence because you yourself can work the same equations and run the same simulations for validation…. And writings on a wall which you may freely read online with a simple google search. The evidence was buildings showing a steady progression of construction, just like evolution does, with each new construction technique demonstrated in sequential order…. Validated by the writing in the building which tells who built them and when. We also have writings on most of the how from the period. But even if hard, immediate evidence which you can see, read, hold and check the math on does not convince you…. I would only ask one question …. What would? The addition of an ancient society, aliens, global floods or any other idea is an elegant solution to a simple answer. The Egyptians built the pyramids and left scads of writings about who, why and how. I suppose the thing I can’t understand about the argument of ancient apocalypse is that the dinosaurs were killed by a meteor and their bones litter the rock strata of the earth so copiously people stumble across them constantly. Where is the evidence anyone but Egypt built the Pyramids? They used saws by the way. Sand is quartz, it cuts rock nicely when compressed by a long copper saw blade. Copper cylinders have been proven, using this technique, to make cylinders of rock, and cylindrical holes in the rock. It’s also likely given that they had lots of sand and charcoal that they figured out how to make silicon carbide sand which would cut through granite like butter. Limestone even easier. The chapter on efflorescence answers the questions about the sphinx and it’s water damage. Water under the sphinx, Nile floods and the rare but present rain would be more than sufficient to cause that kind of damage through efflorescence. Remember the central point of the video…. Reasoning by analogy can be fallacious. This fallacy consists in assuming that because two things are alike in one or more respects, they are necessarily alike in some other respect.

May I respectfully ask which specific ones you’re referring to? There are many, many pyramids.

I am interested to know more about what you mean?

The book "secrets of cold war technology" can clarify what I mean

I used dollars not for accuracy but relatability. It’s just an easy metric, and a great way to display the sheer amount of energy we’re really talking about to someone who may not understand energy in a really scientific way. The bottleneck of current technology is nothing new. When they transitioned from gas and candle lighting everyone debated the cost of stringing power lines and light bulbs and whether it was economically feasible but Tesla pushed ahead anyway. I like to think that in fifty years no one will even remember fossil fuels in the same way. Hope is founded in optimism though, and the progress is slow!

It includes replies to comments in the count - but it still comes up a couple short - and the count does not include any of the 4 other comments i made here which my history shows were made to this video. Curiouser and curiouser, said Alice....

I didn’t receive notification or see those comments. They’re not even in the held section. I’ll check that out!

As I go back through I notice that in fact a lot of comments that are accounted on the app are not appearing. I would never sanction the censoring of anyone’s comment whether I agree or disagree until it grossly violated human decency and respect. This is bothersome. Something about my videos has been ticking off the algorithm. Ever since “Oil is Control” my responses have dropped exponentially. I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised about that.

@@energyisfree Ouch! I already believed you were not the one censoring comments here - but they are being and without your knowledge (until now) or consent. If it is any consolation you are certainly not alone in this - other sites i visit have 'missing' comments also.

@@energyisfree Hmmm... despite me having a screenshot of one of the missing comments i sent you showing YT had received it verbatim, it and the others are NOT showing in my comment history. Maybe I don't exist? Al least as far a YT/Google is concened?

@@MrAuswest don’t feel bad that’s the move now. You can’t control thinking unless you control the dialogue sigh. Free speech is the life blood of free society. Guess we know where we stand.

Nope. Not too far at all. I love it! Music is dizzyingly complex in the western tradition. The interval between semitones is actually governed by the twelfth root of two for some reason. An irrational number. Music and math are two sides of the same coin. No one will ever sell a math album though, sadly.

@@energyisfree No - no Math album i fear too, but Ed Sheeran did title his last album = and others +, X and !/ You are of course correct on each semitone being 2^^1/12 higher frequency than it's predecessor. Pythagoras in the 6th century BC came up with a 12 tone system with 7 notes based purely upon the 3:2 ratio ( Hence his 'Perfect Fifth") in which all tones differed from the fundamental note by factors of 2 and 3 in fractional form, going as high as 2^^10 and 3^^6 (1028/729 = diminished fifth). Unfortunately, as elegant as it was, it contained a 'flaw' (The Pythagorean comma) and could not by itself deliver the required rise and fall over octaves such that each note frequency was twice that of the note an octave below it, nor half that of the one above. There is of course no reason why we have to have 12 semitones in one octave other than it is a 'convenient' interval for our sense of hearing but since we have chosen them the root 1/12th increase is a necessary feature mathematically. I find it most interesting that a very good way of displaying musical notes is via a clockface! I set my 'middle' note, D at 12 o'clock and each semitone falls on the successive hour locations with notes BC and EF immediately adjacent at 2,3o'clock and 9,10 o'clock respectively. If you 'climb' the scales you can accurately determine the 'distance' between each note in successive octaves by 'raising' the clockface by a factor of 2 each time. I have designed a sculpture which displays the frequency and wavelength changes over the range of octaves of human hearing using this system so as to give a 3D pictoral idea of the variations in our musical notes. The seven notes of each octave correspond to the colours of a rainbow, repeated through the 8 octaves. Gives an entirely new understanding of what music could 'look' like! Maybe not entirely a 'rational' one, however, but it suits me. 🙂

@@MrAuswest I find this idea fascinating, this sculpture. Have you realized it in a visual way yet? I would be really interested to see that.

@@energyisfree At present i just have a 3D project drawing using a cheap program, TinkerCAD to give the general idea, but while discussing this i have an improvement i'd like to make. I'm happy to show it off (such as it is) but my graphics skills are UNimpressive (I am in awe at the quality of your video production and graphic skill btw!) so it may take me a day or two to put up a vid on my channel. The initial design had 'rays' streaming out around a central column representing the seven natural notes of each octave, in the 'clock' design for all 12 semitones, with successive octaves climbing ever higher up the column. Revisiting the idea though, I think i could make the design continuous instead of 'digital' producing a smooth upward curling spiral of visual 'soundwaves' with black lines similar to the absorption lines of gaseous spectra indicating each note or tone. Even reducing the wave frequencies down to only those detectable by our human ears gives a range of 30-32000 hz and wavelengths between 10.7m to less than 1cm. It is likely necessary to use logarithmic measurement for height and width of the sculpture to give it more visual appeal and convenience in locating the sculpture in a gallery (or outdoors for that matter!) The mathematics is far easier for me than the visual representation on a computer but i'll do what i can and let you know. It might even be easier to make a small 'to scale' model and post a vid of that?? Make it a great day Sir.

@@MrAuswest let me know what you come up with! I will be very interested to see it and your ingenuity! It sounds like you know what you’re talking about!

Thank you!

@@energyisfree you watch any of my free energy podcasts or my alternate history research?

Actually I did watch your video on wireless power. The conversation you had about various photos. Why do you ask? Was there something you’d like to highlight?