There are three main things we need to develop to fully realize the dream of free energy in our time. #tesla #renewableenergy #energycrisis #energyisfree
Great Concept! This video answers the question i had regarding 'the Catch' concerning totally free energy, namely: Where does the energy come from that we/Tesla are hoping to draw off to use for our own purposes. Answer: We (all) collect and store it from the abundance of free energy sources all over the planet (and especially from the million mile wide fusion reactor 150 million kms away from us that works wirelessly 24/7/365.25. My other question (that you may be planning to answer in a later video) is: What sort of distances apart can two mid-sized (say up to 10MeV) Tesla coils be for one to create and achieve an equal resonance current/voltage in the second? i'm hoping to be able to do some of my own experimentations to see how this works, but at present it's all just 'head stuff', no physical reality.
The second video in this series actually sort of answers this question insofar as the methodology is concerned. Tesla recorded all of his practical experimentation in his patents and his various published research notes and articles. He can teach anyone a basic course in electrical engineering. In Tesla's transmission system it was not so much sending the power to another oscillator (a coil), as it was playing ping pong with a huge mass of charge using two tesla coils as a paddle. You may also get something from my video on how many Tesla towers were required to accomplish the industrial transmission of electricity. Hopefully this helps! Thank you for asking!
Great video, free energy seems like an impossible task, as free anything nothing is really free and energy production is very cost intensive, so who and how would build the infrastructure to then make it for free It really is a great challenge to even start on small scale Governments and people need to make a change in their thinking about this to make this happen
You've noticed the small drawback in the Free Energy claim While the energy being referred to IS FREE, collecting it and then transmitting it from the collectors to the consumers requires capital investment and maintenance costs. These can be spread across all consumers at a 'relatively' small cost (compared to paying for the fuel as well as those related costs) OR they can be paid by investors/venture capital who will naturally want a return on their investments. The transmission infrastructure is already mostly in place, particularly in advanced countries, but was put there at considerable cost and those who paid for it are not going to let it be used (or replaced) for free! Getting rid of the extortion/environmental destruction of digging fuel out of the ground to make energy however is still very much a worthwhile goal. (And one being intensely resisted by those making massive profits from it as well as those politicians who retain their seats by the power those people wield).
Isn't energy already free? Perhaps our fundamental mode of operation, namely our socioeconomic one, prevents energy freedom? Our interpretation of nature is maybe flawed in our basic understanding of thermal dynamics and the concepts of isolated systems? I wrote this a while back and J am still actively writting it, among other things 😅 Hopefully it's enjoyable to all who are reading this. The Energy Freedom Paradox Abstract: The energy freedom paradox is a philosophic physics thesis that states: Energy can only be perceived as free according to the total relativistic capacity of the said system(s) involved. It also states that no system can be closed absolutely, only isolated, with certain probabilities of field interactions. This energy freedom paradox is that our relative human anthropological system design directly influences all other relative systems, determining how much energy freedom is allowed. These probabilistic interactions can have a greater or lesser order of field influence depending on a system(s) relative field capacity (energy density) and velocity of exchange between fields (potential). The paradox lies in the relative field’s probability of isolation from greater/lesser relative field capacity (mass-energy density) and the potential difference between these fields (spin/pressure, vibration, and energy density). It becomes a philosophical science paradox due to humans having a relative field capacity in socioeconomic design that is a first-order function of all relative field interactions. (This fact of systems dynamics would give rise to Boltzmann's Brain Paradox, Maxwell's Demon, and Heidelberg's Uncertainty paradox.) To summarize, it is probable that energy can only be “free” relative to how isolated a system is to other relative systems/fields, according to their impedance/resistance, energy density/magnitude, and velocity/pressure. Which can be represented in capacity, velocity, resistance, and power/work between two or more relative systems/fields.
This is amazing. I love the idea! If phrased in an equation, the only term in this equation which is not empirically definable is the socioeconomic value. That does make it a philosophical/mathematical model in progress if I understand you correctly. How does one solve for the variable of humanity?
@@energyisfree Yes, I think that is correct. We do what Tesla failed to do individualy. We make energy abundant with open source technologies and incentivize values that are not just in material gain. We have incredibly powerful new and old socioeconomic technologies that can be used synergistically. I don't have all the answer's, I am just doing what I can in my own scientific endevours openly with action. None of this I have come to on my own and none of it will go anywhere by myself @consciousenergies I love the channel and encourage you to keep going. ❤️
Consider it done! I have added #energyisfree to each of my videos. If I can do anything else you think might be beneficial don't hesitate to let me know! I am very grateful for your help in spreading the message!
Right now they may…. But chemistry is capable of manipulating many different kinds of things into the molecular configuration required for lubrication. As petroleum becomes more expensive and less available universities and even some companies have been researching biomass based lubricants. Nature makes a lot of things we can substitute for petroleum if we need to. The technology will only move as fast as the demand allows it and demand is increasing. The idea here is getting to where we want to be from where we are. It’s not impossible! It just takes the will.
@@energyisfree Also, Thanks to Mr Dyson of bladeless fan design, we may soon use bladeless turbines to generate electricity from wind power. I believe graphite/graphene has very good lubrication potential
@@lorriecarrel9962 I'm very happy for you. Now he's told you how, you won't have any more energy bills. I, on the other hand, didn't see anything I could consider as *_free!!!_*
Great Concept! This video answers the question i had regarding 'the Catch' concerning totally free energy, namely: Where does the energy come from that we/Tesla are hoping to draw off to use for our own purposes. Answer: We (all) collect and store it from the abundance of free energy sources all over the planet (and especially from the million mile wide fusion reactor 150 million kms away from us that works wirelessly 24/7/365.25.
My other question (that you may be planning to answer in a later video) is: What sort of distances apart can two mid-sized (say up to 10MeV) Tesla coils be for one to create and achieve an equal resonance current/voltage in the second? i'm hoping to be able to do some of my own experimentations to see how this works, but at present it's all just 'head stuff', no physical reality.
The second video in this series actually sort of answers this question insofar as the methodology is concerned. Tesla recorded all of his practical experimentation in his patents and his various published research notes and articles. He can teach anyone a basic course in electrical engineering. In Tesla's transmission system it was not so much sending the power to another oscillator (a coil), as it was playing ping pong with a huge mass of charge using two tesla coils as a paddle. You may also get something from my video on how many Tesla towers were required to accomplish the industrial transmission of electricity. Hopefully this helps! Thank you for asking!
Great video, free energy seems like an impossible task, as free anything nothing is really free and energy production is very cost intensive, so who and how would build the infrastructure to then make it for free
It really is a great challenge to even start on small scale
Governments and people need to make a change in their thinking about this to make this happen
And can't wait for resonance video!
You've noticed the small drawback in the Free Energy claim While the energy being referred to IS FREE, collecting it and then transmitting it from the collectors to the consumers requires capital investment and maintenance costs. These can be spread across all consumers at a 'relatively' small cost (compared to paying for the fuel as well as those related costs) OR they can be paid by investors/venture capital who will naturally want a return on their investments. The transmission infrastructure is already mostly in place, particularly in advanced countries, but was put there at considerable cost and those who paid for it are not going to let it be used (or replaced) for free!
Getting rid of the extortion/environmental destruction of digging fuel out of the ground to make energy however is still very much a worthwhile goal. (And one being intensely resisted by those making massive profits from it as well as those politicians who retain their seats by the power those people wield).
Isn't energy already free? Perhaps our fundamental mode of operation, namely our socioeconomic one, prevents energy freedom? Our interpretation of nature is maybe flawed in our basic understanding of thermal dynamics and the concepts of isolated systems?
I wrote this a while back and J am still actively writting it, among other things 😅
Hopefully it's enjoyable to all who are reading this.
The Energy Freedom Paradox
Abstract: The energy freedom paradox is a philosophic physics thesis that states: Energy can only be perceived as free according to the total relativistic capacity of the said system(s) involved. It also states that no system can be closed absolutely, only isolated, with certain probabilities of field interactions.
This energy freedom paradox is that our relative human anthropological system design directly influences all other relative systems, determining how much energy freedom is allowed.
These probabilistic interactions can have a greater or lesser order of field influence depending on a system(s) relative field capacity (energy density) and velocity of exchange between fields (potential).
The paradox lies in the relative field’s probability of isolation from greater/lesser relative field capacity (mass-energy density) and the potential difference between these fields (spin/pressure, vibration, and energy density). It becomes a philosophical science paradox due to humans having a relative field capacity in socioeconomic design that is a first-order function of all relative field interactions. (This fact of systems dynamics would give rise to Boltzmann's Brain Paradox, Maxwell's Demon, and Heidelberg's Uncertainty paradox.)
To summarize, it is probable that energy can only be “free” relative to how isolated a system is to other relative systems/fields, according to their impedance/resistance, energy density/magnitude, and velocity/pressure. Which can be represented in capacity, velocity, resistance, and power/work between two or more relative systems/fields.
This is amazing. I love the idea! If phrased in an equation, the only term in this equation which is not empirically definable is the socioeconomic value. That does make it a philosophical/mathematical model in progress if I understand you correctly. How does one solve for the variable of humanity?
@@energyisfree Yes, I think that is correct.
We do what Tesla failed to do individualy. We make energy abundant with open source technologies and incentivize values that are not just in material gain. We have incredibly powerful new and old socioeconomic technologies that can be used synergistically.
I don't have all the answer's, I am just doing what I can in my own scientific endevours openly with action.
None of this I have come to on my own and none of it will go anywhere by myself @consciousenergies
I love the channel and encourage you to keep going. ❤️
hi none of your # are linked to your channel
Consider it done! I have added #energyisfree to each of my videos. If I can do anything else you think might be beneficial don't hesitate to let me know! I am very grateful for your help in spreading the message!
Wind turbines require petroleum-based lubricants.
Right now they may…. But chemistry is capable of manipulating many different kinds of things into the molecular configuration required for lubrication. As petroleum becomes more expensive and less available universities and even some companies have been researching biomass based lubricants. Nature makes a lot of things we can substitute for petroleum if we need to. The technology will only move as fast as the demand allows it and demand is increasing. The idea here is getting to where we want to be from where we are. It’s not impossible! It just takes the will.
@@energyisfree Also, Thanks to Mr Dyson of bladeless fan design, we may soon use bladeless turbines to generate electricity from wind power. I believe graphite/graphene has very good lubrication potential
If you know so much about it then why don't you tell us how to do it? 🤓
Very fair question! Soon enough!
he is telling you how
@@lorriecarrel9962 I'm very happy for you. Now he's told you how, you won't have any more energy bills. I, on the other hand, didn't see anything I could consider as *_free!!!_*
@@Graeme_Lastname very respectfully…. And with very friendly intent…. Have you ever grown a houseplant in the sun?
@@energyisfree I doubt if the plants I grow would be considered as houseplants m8.
🙂