Video

How did the baby Moses know his name or that he was a Hebrew?

When he says "BCE" is he talking about the second, third, or only "common" era shift?

Evidence of david kingdom? Until we know, none has said the david's kingdom didn't exist. That is not evidence, everybody knows that kingdom existed.

That gaudy gold dome desecrates the world's most holy site. It's a shame it can't be removed.

Refried Sumerian bullshit

Moses is made-up character, there was no exodus from Egypt. It's all a lie. Read real history no made-up Bible written bunch of idiots.

The scholar knows that Judaism places great weight in their timeline. History leaves us an irrefutable timeline, etched into the living rock of the planet. There's only one answer. Amusing to watch all the ridiculous suggestions that have been proposed. I smell obfuscation. There's ONE pharaoh who tried to introduce worship of the One God in Egypt. Akhenaten was that pharaoh. He closed the temples of the gods of Egypt and raised himself as incarnation of the One God, who was represented by the Sun Disk. He appropriated all the gifts usually given to the various temples and kept it all for himself. The people rebelled, and he and his followers were exiled from Egypt. All of this is documented by the ancient Egyptians themselves, who painted and carved the story on their monuments. The Biblical date of the Exodus from Egypt and the historical date for Akhenaten's rule coincide. There would have to have been TWO exoduses within a 35 year period for Moses to have NOT been Akhenaten. This entire video is misdirection. Ask yourself why these people go through convolutions, trying to obfuscate history. There is an important revelation waiting on the other side of that question.

So they destroy his tombs and what not but conveniently forget to destroy his statues holding a royal baby? Nope, doesn't compute.

That is really something, this was explained very well, great interview.

I had watched your channel before and found that your presentations were extremely difficult to follow and as a Christian and a history major exasperating. Your cross cross between your archeological verbiage expecting a normal(intelligent) to follow. Not only that your constant shuddering also exasperating and STOPPED watching. I decided to check in again and it has not changed. ALSO mentioning all these professors names to general people who wish to learn about these discoveries beyond exasperation. IF I had talked/instructed my students I would have been replaced. IF you wish more people to LOVE to learn and follow your channel “please” consider my evaluation maybe find much better people who can speak clearer would have your site REALLY grow

Shalom! Y’all are simply amazing! I very much enjoyed this presentation. Thank y’all. My vote is for: BC & AD.

Moses' body resurrected 2000 years ago with Adam to the male factor with Jesus

Short answer : NO

This video is a bunch of garbage. It was a small village south of Jerusalem

You have no idea how much evidence I have connected for this perspective.

HALF the Pharaohs were "...MOSISIS"!!!

🤣.... and again, the Egyptian never wrote about him fleeing with million of followers!!! but like 70 yrs after, you have guy who flip Egypt upside-down forcing a "One god religion" .... and give me a break with your tabernacle vs Valley of the kings!!! a temporary temple made from materials/fabric to put the Ark versus a fully carved temple......🤣🤣🤣🥴🤡!!!!

Not even close Try try again

It's highly unlikely that a no name/peasant person was suddenly catapulted into roles of great power and prestige, mostly because there would be no way that they could carry out any single job given to them by royalty. This is because nobility itself is so highly intelligent no one else can actually do what they do and the public actually knows that and elects that power sometimes, particularly in days of old it was just a natural thing people allowed Royalty to do. It is more likely that a person of royal blood or higher intelligence and power such an aristocrat, is actually referring to himself as being a nobody and a peasant, as this is something that nobility actually commonly did and still do, for several reasons. One was to avoid being constantly harassed by the public whom constantly want your opinion and make demands on your time. The second was to try to bond with the lower classes in order to keep things running efficiently, as it is mostly them doing all the labour. This is actually still done to this day by nobility. The late Princess Diana and Prince Phillip are prime examples of this. Prince Phillip purchased a hackney black and drove it so he wouldn't be noticed around London and Princess Diana was the first Royal by marriage to take her children to a theme park to blend in with other mums. Something usually only done by non-royals and aristocrats. Make no mistake. This doesn't mean that they are like you because they aren't.

Hi, how can I get access to this specific magazine?

Schade wegen dem Lärm im Hintergrund während des Interviews. 😮

I am baffled that scientists are baffled by what the ancients can do...that's laughable because those scientists think they are the smartest generation of the human race.

LBIIA That's just where they want it to be. Around 1400 BC time for the conquest. Once again a strong biblical bias. Why? Even carbon 14 date. It's going to be 2A no matter what.😂 Just like their so-called. Joshua alter ABR dates it to lb2a. Even though outside that team even back in the 1980s it was dated lb2b and iron Age 1 which over like 90% of the pottery is iron Age 1 and maybe one pottery shard was actually questionably lb 2a. Not the general population pastors and the laity would believe this. However somebody in the archaeological field would put this up for a question????

No😮

Definitely not

Did you say Edmond ? Is that on the UCO campus or where?

"From the mouth of infants & children You have ordained strength." Psalm 8:2

His name was Daud. Not david. I can read ancient paleo-hebrew characters. It’s actually called Abryth. Or Lashun Rashyth. The man is explaining using modern functions & a perverse “hebrew”. Hay, which is the letter H-A at the beginning of a word, & turns into A-H in the middle or at the end of a word, means “the”. The letter that looks like a “G” is actually a B. It’s called a Bat/Bath. The “X” is the thau. Which makes it T-H. The triangles are both the letter Dalat or “D”. The Y is actually a “U”. Pronounced ooo. It’s not a waw or vav. Those letters didn’t exist until centuries later. The letter is called uau. The letters put together are pronounced with an “a” in between certain letters. We have Ha’Bath Daud, which means “the House of Daud”. I assure you my words are true. If you want to learn ancient Abryth, “Natsarym of YaHUaH” can assist for free. They have lessons on their channel.

What about Moses being a Military Commander that defeated Ethiopia. Is this true?

King Solomon, the Sun, has been around for a long time.

That's a graven image, not Moses.

So some "no-name" is exalted by the Pharaoh and is put in charge of everything and the first person you think of is Moses? Try Joseph, or Zaphnath-paaneah the name given to him by Pharaoh.

(23 July 2024) It is my understanding that Pharaoh Ahmose I was recast as Hebrew Moseh (English: Moses) in the Torah (Pentateuch). That is to say: Egypt's great liberator of foreign control by Hyksos and Cushites, was recast as Israel's great liberator from an Egyptian oppression. This claim by me is met with disdain by some scholars. WHY? The Hyksos expulsion is dated anywhere from ca. 1550 BC to c. 1530 BC by different Egyptologists. !550/1530 BC does NOT align with an Exodus ca. 1446 BC (cf. 1 Kings 6:1), Almost 100 years has expired between the Hyksos expulsion and Israel's Exodus, So it cannot be that the Hyksos expulsion is Israel's Exodus, for some scholars! Not known by many scholars is that the 480 years elapsing between the Exodus and Solomon's Temple, has been challenged by two devout Christian scholars who are also Egyptologists, Professor James K. Hoffmeier (1996) Kenneth A. Kitchen (2003). They arrived at some 600 years elapsing (p. 125) or 596 years (p. 307). Hoffmeier (p. 125. 1996. Israel in Egypt. The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition. Oxford University Press. New York. Oxford): " How then is the 480-year figure treated by scholars who reject it as a literal number? ...as Jack showed, if all the periods are added together, such as the forty years in Sinai, the lengths of the judges, and periods of peace between judges, plus the length of David's reign, the total is 534 years. On top of this figure, the duration of Joshua's leadership in Canaan and the length of Saul's kingship, which are not preserved, bring the total close to six hundred years." Kitchen (p. 307. "Possible Date Limits for an Exodus." 2003. On the Reliability of the Old Testament. William Eerdman's Publishing Company. Grand Rapids, Michigan):" "...the series of aggregate years (counted up through the biblical books) to the 480 years of 1 Kings 6:1...The essence of this was that the 554+xyz years (about 596 years all told) readily fitted..." Add Hoffmeier's 600 years (p. 125. 1996) to Solomon's Temple of ca. 966/7 (cf. p. 124. Hoffmeier. 1996) and we come up with an Exodus of circa 967 BC + 600 yrs = 1567 BC for an Exodus instead of 1446 BC. Add Kitchen's 596 years (p.307. 2003) to Solomon's temple of ca. 966/967 BC, we have an Exodus of ca.1563 BC. Dame Kathleen Kenyon ( British archaeologist of the 1950's) dated the Hyksos expulsion to circa 1550 BC. So, we have: An Exodus ca. 1550 BC (Kenyon's Hyksos expulsion) An Exodus ca. 1567 BC (Professor Hoffmeier's 600 years) An Exodus ca. 1563 BC (Professor Kitchen's 596 years) All of the above align with a Hyksos Expulsion of circa 1550 BC instead of 1 Kings 6:1, ca. 1446 BC. Regretably, Hoffmeier and Kitchen have turned their backs on their research and opted for an Exodus ca. 1260 BC in the days of Ramesses II based on the mention of the store city of Ramesses (Exodus 12:37). Circa 70 AD the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (ca. 70 AD) opined that Manetho's mention of a Hyksos expulsion in his book on Egypt, was probably the Egyptian version of the Torah's Exodus under Moses. In 1992, the Egyptologist, Donald B. Redford, averred that Israel's Exodus was a recasting of the Hyksos expulsion (cf. pp. 412-413. 1992. _Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient times. _ Princeton University Press. Princeton. New Jersey): "There is only one chain of historical events that can accommodate this late tradition, and that is the Hyksos descent and occupation of Egypt...the memory of the Hyksos expulsion did indeed live on in the folklore of the Canaanite population of the southern Levant. The details were understandably blurred and subconsciously modified over time, for the purpose of "face saving." It became not a conquest but a peaceful descent of a group with pastoral associations who rapidly arrived at a position of political control. Their departure came not as a result of ignominious defeat...but as salvation from bondage." I find Josephus and Redford, to be right, the Torah has recast the Hyksos Expulsion as Israel's Exodus. The Egyptian records of the Hyksos era NEVER CALL THE HYKSOS ISRAEL. NO HYKSOS RULER EVER BORE A NAME SIMILAR TO THAT OF MOSES (HEBREW MOSEH). THE ONLY HYKSOS ERA NAME APPROXIMATING MOSEH/MOSES IS PHARAOH AHMOSES I, WHO EXPELLED THE HYKOS. IT IS THUS MY UNDERSTANDING AHMOSES WAS RECAST AS MOSES IN THE TORAH. EGYPT'S LIBERATOR OF FOREIGN CONTROL (HYKSOS AND CUSHITES) became, via an inversion, ISRAEL'S LIBERATOR, MOSES, FREEING HIS PEOPLE OF SLAVERY IN EGYPT. THE HYKSOS DID BECOME EGYPTIAN SLAVES WITH THEIR DEFEAT BY AHMOSES. Egyptian warriors make mention of enslaving captured Hyksos men and women at Avaris, a result of battles. After the expulsion of the Hyksos to Canaan, Ahmoses captured all Canaan and Syria to the Euphrates and for 400 years enslaved these people, depopulating the area through out the Late Bronze Age, hauling them off to Egypt as slaves and booty. The Bible is probably recalling this 400 year slavery in Egypt (ca, 1550 BC to 1130 BC).

The document lost all credibility to me as soon as it decided to stick with biblical pretentions. Conducting archeological search to prove the Bible (or any other such opus) right isn't archeology, but propaganda. An exodus (such as the one in the book) in the 15th century BC is Just. Not. Possible. Period. As certain as death and taxes. No source, up to the Merneptah stele, and including the Amarna letters, Hittites or Mycenian (the true powers of that time) speaks of an invincible horde of magical Heb'rews Jen 'o' siding their way all over Canaan. In my personal opinion, there has been no Exodus, of if there was, it was a much smaller-scale, ideological event. Or maybe there was a exodus of some sort in the wake of the Bronze Age Collapse, as the coastal populations were fleeing the Sea People's incursions for the safety of the hills. Basically, everything included in the Pentateuch are myths adapted from other, older cultures.

Moses is one of the 24 elders... Same a Enoch, and everyone else god took to heaven... Read your Bible

Pharaoh Tutmoses…is Moses

I really don't like the way Brent Nagtegaal had to look on his papers while the most interesting things are told! Not polite at all. Please film just the one who is interviewed and not the interviewer anymore (in this way) I like your videos very much and enjoy it most of the time. So, no bad feelings please; it is ment to be a suggestion to improve the skills of Brent Nagtegaal. From Holand with ❤

So no gave of a God boy. No grave of a God boy mother/brother/sister. Let me know why the most powerful being, gets upset at other Gods being prayed to. If he is all powerful why is he upset ? Seems many key points of the religion are copied from other religions. So next to nothing original, that should worry religious folks. I notice the Catholic Church were very good at Archeology, they seem to have found just over a thousand trees all being part of the holy cross.

I wish you'd show more of the actual alter rather than talk so much.

What's the connection to Ramses II? What's there to make that connection??

Hmmm.. why you using Proto Alphabetic when talking about anything Hebrew or Cannaanite? this is not an accepted term unless you are referring to Akkadian or Proto-Afro-Asiatic.. just fyi.

#7 - okay so what was the data of the DNA? Was it Haplogroup J1, J2 that is found in Northern Iraq or not?

If you dont start with an early view of the exodus and Amenhotep II, then you will never figure it out, since anything else is a secular view attempting to disprove Isreal in Egypt, and a complete lie. Good on you for that.

Just ordered my free subscription. 😊 My kids and I love learning about ancient biblical history... Ok, I love learning and want to instill that passion to them. But still! Thank you.

Please create also a spotify channel! Would love to listen to you there

Free Palestine!

Also, we have to see when Israel appeared on the scene and when Egypt left Canaan. The Exodus therefore occurred only after Ramses II. And Ramses II ruled Egypt when it was the strongest, it was during this time when Israel was enslaved in Egypt. Ramses II is called Malol in Sefer haYashar. His son was the Exodus Pharaoh. Even though Merneptah succeeded him according to our knowledge, his brother actually preceded him and his name was Khaemwaset. The firstborn son of Khaemwaset was also called Ramses, and this son was called the son of the king, which not only implies that Khaemwaset was king, but that Merneptah erased him as king from Egyptian history. Therefore Merneptah wrote that Israel is destroyed, since he attempted to remove every trace of them from the Egyptian records. Merneptah therefore succeeded Khaemwaset after the Exodus.

Many scholars think that Amenhotep II was the Pharaoh of Exodus. Others build a good case for the preceding pharaoh, Thutmose III, as the Pharaoh of Exodus. Many think Hatshepsut was the adoptive Egyptian mother. But there’s also a good case that she was not.1 Kings 6:1 says that the Exodus happened 480 years before Solomon began to build the Temple in Jerusalem in the fourth year of his reign - and that would be about 966 B.C. That would mean the Exodus began around 1446 B.C.If you take the dates from the Metropolitan Museum of New York, Thutmose III reigned from 1479 until 1325 B.C. (Different sources have different dates for the same pharaohs). If Moses was in his late 30s at the time of the Exodus, then Hatshepsut could be a candidate for his adoptive mother. But Acts 7 says that Moses was about 80 years old at the time of the Exodus. That would put Moses’ birth at around 1526 B.C. According to the MET, that would be at the very end of the reign of Ahmose I (1550-1525 B.C.) and the beginning of the reign of his son Amenhotep I (1525-1504 B.C.) The sources I could find say that Amenhotep I had either one son who died when he was very young, or no children at all; so, no daughter. Ahmose I did have at least one daughter. Some sources say he had 2 daughters, Sitamun A and Meritamun B. Others say Sitamun A was not his daughter. Meritamun B married her brother Amenhotep I, as was the custom of the time. Here’s a case for Meritamun having been Moses’ adoptive mother: She was the daughter of a pharaoh (Pharaoh Ahmose I). And since her husband (Amenhotep I) did not have children of his own, he may have let her adopt and raise Moses. But thta is speculation. When Amenhotep I died in 1504 B.C., he was succeeded by Thutmose I who was his military commander and believed to possible have been a grandson of Ahmose I by a sibling of Amenhotep I. Probably Egyptian officials would have wanted someone from the line of the pharaohs to be the successor, not an adoptive son - and not a Hebrew adoptive son. Exodus I says the Israelites were enslaved at the time around Moses’ birth. Acts 7 says that Moses was about 40 when he fled to Midian. That would have been around 1485 B.C. in the reign of Thutmose I (1504-1492 (MET)). Acts 7 says that he then returned to Egypt about 40 years later - about 1446 B.C. in the reign of Thutmose III. Thutmose III started off with many great military conquests, but this trailed off at the end of his career. His successor, Amenhotep II carried out few conquests. nobody can be 100% certain

God bless you and thank you for all you do 🙂🙏

I'm not sure what "castemate" is?