Why Russia wants to restore the Soviet borders
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 07. 2021
- ✔ The first 100 people to go to www.blinkist.com/CaspianReport are going to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out. You'll also get 25% off if you want the full membership.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia lost centuries of territorial expansionism. It was left exposed and at risk of further disintegration.
Support CaspianReport
✔ CZcams membership ► / @caspianreport
✔ Patreon ► / caspianreport
✔ PayPal ► www.paypal.me/caspianreport
✔ Merchandise ►teespring.com/stores/caspianr...
Crypto endorsement
✔ Bitcoin ► 1MwRNXWWqzbmsHova7FMW11zPftVZVUfbU
✔ Ether ► 0xfE4c310ccb6f52f9D220F25Ce76Dec0493dF9aA0
✔ Bitcoin Cash ► 1BKLti4Wq4EK9fsBnYWC91caK7NZfUhNw9
Join us on Facebook or Twitter
✔ Twitter ► / caspianreport
✔ Facebook ► / caspianreport
✔ My equipment and editing software ► www.amazon.com/shop/caspianre...
Watch CaspianReport in other languages
✔ Spanish ► / historiageopol%c3%adtica
✔ Russian ► / thecuriouscat
✔ The first 100 people to go to www.blinkist.com/CaspianReport are going to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out. You'll also get 25% off if you want the full membership.
This video is as smart as playing CIV 5 on beginner.
Not a bit biased?
Shirvan for the love of God please pronounce it as Mos-go instead of Mos-cow. I can't stand the american pronunciation.
*weird.* I clicked your video and saw that I wasn't subscribed to you. I was pretty sure that I was subscribed to your channel, bro.
Russia has no more "need" to conquer and annex these territories than Hitler had the "need" to exterminate Russians and occupy their homes to secure his own homeland. This is an apology for Russian expansionism and has total disregard for the lives of the people in the lands whose freedom you dispose of so casually.
"Russia was expanding at a rate of one belgium per year" And I thought we germans were the only ones that use Belgiums as a measurement unit for expansion! :D
😂
Belgium: Now I know why I exist
Should have used Toyota Corollas as a measure.
nah, we measure our expansion is polands per year. belgiums per year is the measurement for how much our invasion of france got halted.
China expanding one China Sea per year?
Believe it or not we brazilians sometimes use Belgiums to measure our rainforest deforestation rate
Why Not using "Sri Lanka" instead of Belgium??
so sad :(
@@gouthamsudheer5544 Most people will say what the fuck is a Ssss hhh rri how the fuck is pronunced, Lanka.
@@gouthamsudheer5544 Sri what?
You guys cant do anything. Cant wait til a coalition comes to smack you people in the face for burning and chopping down our unique rainforests
Here we are half a year later and your analysis is proving spot on.
Yeah it's Russia almost captured Kiev 💯
As bad as this is going to sound... I understand why Russia is doing what it's doing... NATO should leave Ukraine under Russia influence if it wants peace
I think you got it backwards, Russia must leave Ukraine alone or risk disolving, again.
@@RERM001 There is no backwards or forwards in this. It’s geopolitics. Putin is a tyrannical dictator, no doubt, but it’s perfectly legitimate for Russia to be concerned about NATO expansion on its doorstep. 5 times over the past 4 centuries an invading army has tried to dissolve the Russians from the West. How many fkn times does that have to happen before ignorant people like you begin to understand Russia’s concerns. The US was willing to risk nuclear war over Cuba. If the Chinese entered into a military cooperation pact with a deeply anti-American Mexico government and started equipping and training Mexican soldiers while setting up forward facing military equipment along the Rio Grande, the US would raze Mexico City to the ground before allowing that to continue. There are no clean hands in international politics. This isn’t fkn Disneyland.
@@mensrea1251 There is zero appetite for war from western nations / NATO. This much should be obvious from our reluctance to put "Boots on the ground". War between NATO and Russia has no winners.
I found your understanding of Russian history and its borders very helpful to me especially as I'm trying to understand the current crisis unfolding in Ukraine. Thank you so much.
Well, we can say that russia is concerned for decades after the dissolution. The West just ignored every concern and adopted more and more nations into NATO. 2008 Putin said that every further attempt to expand eastwards.. he will seperate east ukraine and make it russian again. Crimea was also a very much needed part of land to have entrance to the warmwater ports to the black sea. Right now Russia marches in Ukraine and will probably set up a new moscow friendly goverment there. This all could be avoided if both sides worked together more and took russia also seriously. Im Curios that they waited so long to act actually, i expected this years ago.
@@semiramisubw4864 doesnt Russia already have access to the black sea? Or am i missing something?
@@abcdefg91111 they didn't wanted to NATO get the naval base there it would be a strategic disaster for them
@@semiramisubw4864 You speak as if Ukraine is owned by Russia. That's the problem there. Russia is just too greedy. Putin is just too greedy. NATO is a military alliance, while Russia is trying to expand its territory, they are not comparable. There's nothing to work on between those two because at the core of this conflict is Putin's ego.
@@semiramisubw4864 putin's a bully, you're trying to justify a horrible, unnecessary crime
“Expanded one Belgium per year” I love that measuring system 😂
You know what they say. A Belgium a year keeps the step nomads away.
It's a standard measurement system in the US
I came straight to the comments after hearing that 😂
@@Rgermian Belgium is the metric measurement, Maryland is the standard
Love you all god bless 🥂
new unit invented by Shirvan:
1Belgium per year
Americans will surely use that before they even think about the Metric system.
@@sobertowelie3267 jokes on you, half of americans probably only think that Belgium is a waffle company
~an american
You all spelled “german speedbump” wrong. What the hell is a belgium
@@generalmarkmilleyisbenedic8895 Ha, we sold uranium to both US and Germany after that tough , KACHING! (sound of Belgian cashregister , also expends waffle scent )
Azam Khan did you Know that Pakistan is British Puppet state which was create brutal force ?
most of the top comments are about your use of Belgium as a unit of measurement but I think we ought to give more recognition to the depth of thought and research that went into this video. Great effort, great content, and very well presented with the visuals.
Exactly some people are absolute sheeps
yeah its annoying how some stupid kids just upvote the same fucking comment which adds nothing interesting other than just rewriting the phrase that doesnt even belong to them
Fully agree
@@Memesoft CZcams will never be an intellectual form as long as the majority of its viewers are dumb as a hammer.
Agree, took me way too long to find something relevant. This was supremely educational, I agree!
Watching this on day 35 of the Russian Ukrainian War. You were spot-on accurate.
"At a rate of one Belgium per year"
Is that the standardized measurement for territorial expansion? 🤔
For germany, yes.
@Beren Erchamion it's their own fault, the reason belgium is a "thing" is because britain wouldn't accept french interests in the region
@@johnalan6067 For some reason all the travel guides I found in Berlin said the best way to see Paris was through Belgium!
Beren Erchamion shut up 🤫
@@TanyaLairdCivil Sus
"To know a countries geography is to know it's foreign policy" Words to live by.
Definition of Geopolitics in a nutshell
Our (US) Foreign Policy is based on what Israel wants.
@@Mr67Stanger shut up
Lol have you seen the anti semites in the US Congress lately? Israel is on her own the next 4 years.
@@trippybruh1592 not really. Despite the squad and the far left in Congress most of the moderate democrats and republicans support Israel. The US still sees Israel and other countries like Jordan and Egypt has key allies in maintaining some stability in the ME
“When one faces a cornered bear, the essence of strategy is choosing what not to do”
That’s a great quote.
If you reward a bully by giving them exactly what they want, don't be surprised when they come back for more.
(by the way, that's just with reference to this invasion, it's not to say NATO countries aren't bullies themselves)
His prediction became truth 💯
If the bear comes up the tree after you it’s a black bear. If it knocks the tree down it’s Grizzly bear. If it stands up and picks you out of the tree it’s a Kodiak bear.
When a bear wants to attack you prepare by having sufficient ammo, and if it attacks, you kill it.
If Russias security depends on the baltics, Poland, and Ukraine perhaps Russia should not have treated the people in those lands so poorly for so long that once they gained their independence they would immediately seek refuge with Russias enemies.
Or, better yet, don't exapnd so much that your only option to hold the territory is to keep claiming more territories. At this point they need to control the whole Earth to feel safe. Safe from what? Their imaginary threats. Safe from their incompetence to compete economically.
@@ararune3734 I had the same thought... it's a fallacy of security : if you're 99% safe, are you "safe" ? And 99.9% ? 99.99% ? ...
@@leyasep5919 You can never achieve absolute security. Even countries that join NATO can't say they're secure, it's more so a deterring factor. Like I don't know if you've read about it but literally last night a Russian drone crashed in the Croatian capital, which is a NATO member. It flew through 3 countries with not so much as a warning, when really it should've been taken down in Romania already. Flew through Hungary for 40 minutes.
They didn't seek refuge immediately, to be fair. Russia was too fucked up in the 90's to make friends with anyone so they sought European aid and partnerships
@@ararune3734 also...imaginary threats?
Russia has been invaded brutally a whole lot of times. Mongols invaded incredibly brutally, it's still a damn scar in the historical psyche, attempts by the Livonian order and minor European powers on Novgorod (the last independentish part of Kievan Rus), then 100 years after figuring our independence from the Golden Horde, collapse due to external forces trying to install puppet kings in a weak moment. Major invasions my Poland, very traumatic experience as well. Then 100 years later it's the Swedes, less brutal but still violent invasion, threatening Russian statehood and therefore culture. 100 years later, it's the damned French who made their way all across Europe to invade Russia. 100 years later, it's Germany and it's Allies, twice, the second time with the goal of wiping out most of the population and enslaving the rest, also nearly succeeding.
So yeah, imaginary threats.
somebody tell the Belgians they need to expand at a rate of one Russia every year.
@@serdobsky_ и 50к., это счастье 😂
Looking at how they ruled in Congo I don't think that would be a good idea
@@TheTokkie aside from this potentially be the greenest empire ever, you're right 😄
The world would turn to Belgium in 6 years
@@Omer1996E.C ... and then space, the final frontier 🤣
Russia expanded 1 Belgium per year
Americans: finally a measurement system we can use 😂
Lol
We usually measure by hamburgers or alaskas but belgiums can work too.
Our largest I know is by purchases. Like the Louisiana purchase! Three of them basically make an america!
Belgium: am I a joke to you?
What’s a Belgium all I know is Big Macs- per bald eagle
@@Sam_Sabaka1 more like war crimes per corporate bailout 😂😂
Nice idea, but it is never going to happen. Eastern Europe has had enough of Russian domination, which is why they clamor to join collaborative geopolitical structures like the EU and NATO. If NATO hadn't existed, they would have invented it themselves. The world is over empires, they died in the 20th century. The world is happy to let Russia alone, but if it insists on recreating the Russian empire, it will feel increasing push-back.
The Soviet Era is over, and the world is a different place from the one that allowed for the creation of the USSR.
We are all better informed, better educated, better connected, ..........and better armed.
Give it up Mr Putin, we are not wearing it, and all you will do is drive your country to ruin.
Absolutely!!!!! Excellent comment
The age of empires is not over, it is on pause. We are living through a slow fall of western civilization and Pax-Americana, not due to external threat but internal division, and will collapse eventually, probably sooner than later, like the seemingly invincible and eternal Roman empire 1500 years ago. The people then didn't expect a collapse either.
The Russians worry what new threats will emerge when the world goes to hell, and want to shore up their borders before then, it seems.
The age of empires is over???? Slow down with Netflix, it kills your brain cells. The U.S. is an empire, a liberal empire and probably the most violent one in history. They have done way worse things from what Putin is doing today. I can't believe you ignorance, really. They use spheres of influence to hold their hegemony and when that doesn't work, they invade from far away and kill civilians. At least Russia is fighting on its boarders, which is a concept unknown to the U.S.
@@Bromoteknada It would be great if all imperial superpowers fell, including Russia, the US, India and China. Just be normal countries ffs.
My man called it 7 months before it happened. Your insights into Geopolitics are so good shirvan (hope I spelt that right)
Prophetic
Putin has been very open about this for many years so he added nothing new.
His map rotation is getting out of hand 😂😂
I like it because you don't often get the polar outlook from more southerly peoples.
I got dizzy
@@treefarm3288 Compare 1930s Nazi Germany Vs 2020s Communist Chinazi IN YOUR NEXT VIDEO Project.
It’s a little annoying but it really forces you to know the shapes of nations
Tell him the Earth is not a sphere and none rotating.
"How old are you ?"
"I am 0.1 Belgiums"
Lol
so, 19 ?
What a nightmare of a unit. As time passes the unit counts more. So maybe not you're 0.1, next year you'll be like 0.11 but the year after you'll be like 0.119.
@@Utars yeah 😂
@@Utars wait how I can't math
Let's get one thing straight here: Countries aren't flocking into Russia's arms to be protected against NATO. Somehow Putin is unable to wrap his head around this.
I think you make a great point here. The conflict with russia and nato is by no means onesided, but its mostly instigated by Putin. I think many russians still have a cold war era mentality, that Americans only want to see russia burn and western europe is ready help. The problem is that relations are pretty far gone. I doubt even if Putin were to give a less aggressive stance, stop invading small countries, and open up to more forign cooperation, would be waiting over a decade for any real change. Meanwhile the only country that actually wants to f over russia/is, along with anyone and anything not chinese, is rising in power and quickly surpassing russia. With the amount of russian technology China has stolen or coppied youd think Putin would be brutal towards them. It amazes me how many things china steals, copies, and them resells. I think Putin is trying find enemies where there isnt any. If you treat someone like they want to hurt you when they obviously wont, relation are obviously going to be very strained. That person might even start thinking the same of you. If putin wants to avoid conflict amd protect russian interests, maybe he should focus on making friends instead of enemies! Or make forign powers interested in protecting russian interests.
Well, both Russia and China are making the same mistake. Making your neighbors nervous.
Countries that had sat on the fence are making their choice.
sorry, but you are getting nothing straight here, l'm afraid. NATO is instigating old russian fears by threatening the russian borders, just like Hitler and Napoleon previously did years ago. This key fact constantly goes past your lot's analysis and you keep resorting to idealism, ideology and anglosphere exceptionalism. Showing a lack of emphaty and undestanding of sensitivities, while by the way refusing to use diplomacy in order to solve these issues while instead thrying to shove your own point of view, considered superior, down other people's throats.
@@thomasridley8675 I don't remember Russia having done anything about the Baltics entering NATO, because they where not considered as a threat to it's own country security, but instead a recognition of baltic soveregnity after the soviet years. As you can see the rigid ideological point ot view is not in Moscow or in Putin's head, unfortunately.
@@derbaeumaed8158
You do know that nobody wants to invade Russia ? It's all just propaganda.
Going back 30 yrs isn't possible. No matter how much Putin wants it. The world has changed too much.
It's not like many countries are asking to join the Russian alliance.
And invading Ukraine could backfire if Putin's goal is to stop NATO expansion.
This aged surprisingly well
LMFAO
Before the mongols subjugated The Rus Principalities, these proto russian city states don't even try to expand anywhere beyond their city walls. After the mongols however, they're so obsessed to control the whole eurasia just to protect moscow.
Russia is successor of the Mongolian empire. Russia is always super power.
@@user-nz2dp9pk6w No it's not, Russia become super power because of foreign invasion.
Trauma
Well that is a long time ago
No justification for Russia to continue seeking to rule over other countries
@@hilmansudirman9857 How is that posible?
If Russias back is against the wall and they turn around and fight, aren't they just fighting a wall? Lol
Good catch.
Russia is the north, the wall
I like how your 🧠 works
@@vos3373 Russia is a backwater nation.
Most of it's small towns and small cities are dying.
Most towns and small cities have no roads or running water.
It's economy is smaller than Texas, a single state in the United States.
Russian GDP 1.7 Trillion
Texas GDP 1.9 Trillion
LOL
@@phillip_iv_planetking6354 still with military budget 15 times smaller than US has, Russia is capable to overpass Americans in hypersonic weapons, rockets, fighting jets and military programming.
Sounds fun isn’t it?
By the way, lately mighty Texas with excessive GDP was incapable to withstand a single storm. And the whole state with $1,8 trln by GDP left the vast majority of households without electricity, heating and hot water.
Money doesn’t show you the full picture.
Everybody dreams of having an empire, but that is not cheap.
NATO is Russia biggest rival... Of course they don't want to cede influence in Ukraine to their enemies, it all makes sense to me now, it weakenes Russia a lot.
This just shows how aggressive and paranoid Russia is.
"Nothing is easier than to denounce the evildoer; nothing is more difficult than to understand him."
The quote is attributed to Fyodor Dostoevsky, just in case anyone was curious to know.
And Napoleon said- to know a nation's geography is to know its foreign policy
The CIA Report would be a better title for this channel.
Certainly this is CIA report
It would be easier to understand if narrator remembered times when Moscow became part of Golden Horde and finally took lead.
Yeah, that's total BS. They are very easy to understand and very predictable.
Yes bro with the help of world's most powerful propaganda machine USA think that they can fool the whole world haha no way it's not going to happen.
I've found modern Russia's foreign policy to be confusing, but understanding the geography like this helps one understand. Russia is afraid of an invasion by external foes and wants to get borders that are cheaper to maintain, but to grasp them would mean war. So they use any means necessary to try and get the borders they once held. Ironic, but Russia's fear of invading forces and relying on force instead of diplomacy is raising tensions, possibly creating a conflict that they are trying to avoid. It is a scary situation but a good analysis nonetheless.
A war declared by Nato is nearly impossible as long as Russia is a reliable source of fossil fuels. China is their strategic partner so a war here would be also impossible. Russia is struggling since years because of Putins corruption. Like every dictatorship struggling within its own borders Putin tries to cover it up with aggressions against a made up concept of an enemy. Nato even just left Syria so russia could maintain its political grip over the region. China is also struggling now within its borders, thats why aggressions against Nato and neighbouring nations have risen so much, they need also a enemy to use it for populism among its own people.
@@derunfassbarebielecki Ahh the average CNN enjoyer can be seen here
@@KitchenFSink The news im consuming arent american at all. But yeah stick to your small little world where every critique against russia is done by americans. Be sure that the true liar is the one defaming any critique, organisation or person against him as foreign agents etc. Reporters without borders, amnesty international and many more are part of the critics and if you know them you would know, that their relationship to CNN and even the American government is pretty bad.
Funily enough RT is spreading lies about the pandemic in the west, but is supporting Putin back home, just like this media is for propaganda usage only.
@@derunfassbarebielecki "Aggressions against NATO are common" is enough for me to dismiss your comment as a whole.
@@KitchenFSink Thats because im right. Putins whole foreign policy is a big aggression towards Nato and China. Proof me wrong if its so easy to dismiss my claims.
Germany wants to seperate political and economical coorporation with russia and on the other hand Putin makes it cleat that he utilizes economical warfare towards germany and other semi-neutral Nato members. Hopefully Russias recent aggressions will lead to a relocation of Germanys Russia policies. And be sure as the biggest economy of Europe Germany will kill Russias economy, it will be worse than the sanctions against the invasion of Crimea.
Let's not forget that one important factor causing USSR's debacle at the early stage of the German invasion in the summer of 1941 was Stalin.
He purged hundreds of experienced and progressive generals in the 30s, hugely weakening the army. He created for himself an unassailable position at the pinnacle of an autocratic state. As he clung to his conviction that Hitler would not risk a second front by attacking the Soviet Union, in spite of all the detailed, comprehensive intelligence of an impending German attack he had received since July 1940, the Soviet Military's effort to enhance the USSR's defense capabilities had been limited.
In February 1941, the Soviet Defense Commissariat issued a directive naming Germany as the probable enemy and instructed the frontier regions to make appropriate preparations. But Stalin replaced the Chief of Staff who issued the directive, and the new one did little to follow up the order.
German reconnaissance flights were frequently sighted over the Baltic States (almost a daily occurrence) by early March 1941. Admiral Kuznetsov gave the Baltic Fleet permission to open interdictory fire without warning. Kuznetsov was soon summoned to the Kremlin. He was reprimanded by Stalin in person and was ordered to revoke his order.
About a week before the German attack, the commander in Kiev, convinced that war was coming, sent Stalin a personal letter asking permission to evacuate 300,000 civilians from the frontier regions, to prepare defense works and set up antitank barriers. The reply he got was: This would be a provocative act. Do not move.
When the Nazi attack began on 22 June 1941, Stalin was reduced to a state of nervous collapse. He locked himself up in his room, unable or unwilling to participate in state affairs. No one in the Kremlin dared to make any decision and the people were left in a fog without leadership. Only on July 3rd did Stalin finally speak to the country. By then the German army had invaded Soviet Moldavia, captured Minsk, and was approaching Kiev.
The buffer states were little more than a sacrifice to save Russia from a total defeat brought by its dictator's colossal error of judgement.
This video aged well, sadly.
Caspian Report: Why Russia wants to restore the Soviet borders
Russian Neighbors: Winter is coming.
Expanding border is sooo 19-20th century . In the 21st century what matters is to empower each socities gifted individuals to create wealth through enterprenership and r&d. The US poaching of elon musk from SA is 10 times more valuable than getting control of a decently profitable oil field.
@@wv9529 The issue is educated people are double edged sword for dictatorships. They are more likely to meddle in your affairs should they not be sadisfied with your rule
@@wv9529 no, if you have perfect borders like the usa sure but if you are in a vurnable geographic position like most states, then no
@@rafradeki which is way modern sucesfful societies are either democracies or technocratic dictatorships which can absorb these people , other wise you get either brain drain or chaos
Nay, with Baltics it's like "ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ"
Russia can never keep on competing with economies that are mulitple times their size, It's a miracle they've kept up this long
It's not a miracle. It's because U.S. and Europe provided humanitarian aid and generous funding to the starving Russian workers and scientists throughout the 90s.
@@dulat Really now?
@@dulat highly doubt that lol
@@alancient8463 that’s a fact, lear history.
Well Globally Russia is falling behind in terms of its influence but Regionally No it is still maintaining its influence
Why haven’t anybody told Russia no one is intrested in conquering it? People only want to live in peace!
Imagine a Russia friendly to its European neighbours, integrated in our economy and open to cultural exchange. Russia is a culturally rich, beautiful and vastly interesting country so it’s such a shame it acts like this.
well, for them the approach of Nato in Ukraine is as if Russia wants military bases in Quebec. Do you imagine Usa histerya in such a situation?
@@OperatoreDelMiniCalcolatore No, it’s like asking your abusive husband to stop hitting you or you’ll call the police.
@@linusfotograf it's more complicated than this (as we know and this video explain)
@@OperatoreDelMiniCalcolatore Well, all I said was to imagine a friendly Russia. It’s a shame.
Ooou yes. Russia is cultural rich: vodka, Kalashnikov, ushanka head bears, ballet and Natashas
Much like Muscovy, I am also expanding 1 Belgium a day.
Good, good! Let the Belgian fries flow through you.
@@uninstaller2860 and the delicious ruddy dark beer
Lay low on the cupcakes 😂👍
wider than wide putin
COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA ??? RUSSIA 🇷🇺 MINIMUM WAGE IS $ 2 DOLLARS USA 🇺🇸 PER HOUR LIKE CHINA 🇨🇳 .
1. Russia has nuclear weapons so no one will actually attack them military into their heartland.
2. There is no appetite in Europe or the US to Attack Russia in foreseeable future, with maybe the exception of Kaliningrad oblast but even then no one will actually even articulate that due to the high risk of such a move.
3. what actually is a threat to Russia is internal collapse due to the un-attractiveness of Russia's economically political model to its own citizens.
4. So actual idea is to weaken or destroy alternatives on their borders & consolidate internally based on war mobilisation.
5. It has nothing to do with foreign aggression treat but solely with Russia internal politics
Great analysis. I would add that the Russian economy is too reliant on oil and gas industry, and therefore their foreign policy is not only a matter of internal political propaganda but a way to secure the access to those ressources.
Wish it was in the video, not some century old bs.
Exactly, if anything is to be the end or Russia it's the internal conflict not NATO directly attacking them. If Moscow losses it's grip on power non Russian Republics like Chechnya, Dagestan and others will start demanding more autonomy and ultimately full independence. It's probably what Kremlin fears the most and USA and NATO are well aware of that.
I see you guys talking about Russia’s biggest threat being internally and that the US and NATO wouldn’t invade in the near future. In the video he also mentioned the threat of China and Turkey in the Caucuses and Central Asia. I’m not an expert but wouldn’t that be a bigger threat to Russia rather than internal matters? I’m just here to learn :)
Yeah. Of course I'm just some guy, but as an EU citizen, the thought of attacking Russia is utterly outlandish.
I hear a lot of "protection" and "defense" in this explanation, but I've got to ask..exactly who or what is threatening to invade Russia? No, really..I'd like to know what they're protecting themselves from..because other than Western Europe (who could only attack through NATO, and that organization barely has defensive capability as it is) or China (who's shared border Russia doesnt seem to be concerned about) where is the threat coming from? It's about power and influence, nothing more and nothing less.
I like your analysis. I acknowledge world wars in the 20th century involved defending territory, but the world has changed. Wealth in the future will not be dependent on accumulation of territory. Wars for territory is a thing of the past. NATO has no incentive to attack Russia.
@@neilabernath5862 Zero incentive and Putin is a smart man, he knows this. Nonetheless he will persuade a lot of people this is a "defensive" move, and that includes many of his own people with the help of state owned media. (Much like our own that may as well be state owned when their chosen party is in office)
@@neilabernath5862 Territory can certainly still be involved in the 21st century, especially when it's a strategic location (Crimea) or contains valuable natural resources. (Ukraine in general) What we're seeing today is the culmination of those two things combined with the Kremlin's fear of yet another former Soviet satellite joining NATO.
Threat is a word used as an excuse to expand
Quality content that never teach in school. We need to understand history to know the motivs of Russia.
Nowadays: we never had better transportation
Also nowadays: hills and deserts are political walls
Well try to cross Sahara with a tank and see if you will succeed...
Logistical walls. It's hard to maintain supply lines across rough terrain like deserts and it's easy to interrupt supply lines across hilly terrain that generates natural choke points.
@@j03man44 Not just military lines of logistics, but civilian as well. In the American Northeast corridor there's a good chance you're burning fuel from the Mid East. Go to the American Midwest and odds are you're driving on gas from the Dakotas. The World's oceans and plains are far easier and cheaper to cross than the rugged mountains of Appalachia.
Plains also give a very good way of destroying armies and mechanised infantry too. Unless there’s a heavily forested plain that is.
@@2x2is22 Excellent example. You used a real-life, current instance of the problem to demonstrate that it exists. It is possible to transport things and people over the mountains, hence the existence of a single country spanning both sides, but it is difficult and war will make it worse.
Just a correction, who forged those borders was the Russian Empire, not the Soviet Union
Yeah it was always the Russian strategy not the soviet's or Stalin's, he knows that becouse he seen the Russian Empire map in 17th, 18th and 19th century. It's a very important detail that I hope The Caspian Report will acknowledge.
Not completely. The borders in the Ukraine and Belarus were fashioned out of the peace deals after the Second World War.
the soviet union had to reconquer much of the territory between 1917 and 1945.
@@moonshinei Slightly different.. Sometimes Russian empire was even biger then USSR.
@@saviobiogen9914 If we did that, we would have to include areas such as Karelia, Manchuria, Poland, and Northern areas of Persia. You'd be right in saying these are good territories to take, but all are difficult to defend and the negatives of fighting China, Iran, the EU, etc. largely outweigh those positives. This video details areas that aren't part of any larger empire or union, which is why they were included.
This didn't age well
This was a very interesting video. I remember as a child, my mom taught me some of the stuff but the detail this video went into was far beyond what I have learned. This was amazing
You can't "restore" something with decreasing population and a faltering economy; its former (Soviet) territories have their own plans and strategies, things that are can hardly be changed (unless those countries are occupied by force and with a cost that Russia may not be able to pay, neither in economic term nor in human terms).
Russia can no longer play with maps and "chessboards", it needs to play with intelligent economics, investments, human capital, development (all things that hardly thrive under harsh regimes: China can because of its utter sheer size and even so, still lags behind).
Russia roars a lot (like a lot), like an old lion who depends on the old fear for the vultures to stay away, but it's an old, weak lion nevertheless. And it doesn't know how to raise a new lion cub.
This. Russia's lashing out, IMO, has much more to do with Putin wanting to maintain power by distracting his population with perception of enemies all around.
Return to this comment of yours in a few years and evaluate the difference between your words and the objective situation. Every month he becomes more ridiculous and incompetent. Russia grows stronger every day. It is growing in a strategic sense. Which is far more alarming to its rivals than simple economic growth.
@@lagautmd
Lol it's not a perception. NATO is literally trying to encircle russia with forces and offensive weapons on their border, and Washington openly talks about their desire for regime change there. How can you be so thick? Russia is determined not to be destroyed like iraq, Libya, syria and all the other failed states ransacked and pillaged by the u.s. warmongers
As Mitt Romney said in 2011, don't underestimate Russia
@@Catwoman1464
Good old Mittens
As a German, I can confirm this measuring unit.
Lol
Excellent work here and how incredibly prescient.
needed this, Thanks! Helps me a bit to make sense of yesterday and today.
Next video: Why Russia can't restore the Soviet borders
Still adding indoor plumbing to homes.
Nato . Also look at what chechnya did to the russian army unsupported and now imagine nearly 40x larger war with western support . It would destroy Russias economy
@@sababugs1125 Biggest arsenal of nuclear weapons. Also look at what taliban did to the combine NATO army unsupported =P
@@sababugs1125 Russian military suffered from massive corruption, outdated equipment and terrible commandment. Chechen war was a partisan one, and all partisan wars are really difficult (Afghanistan, ISIS etc). More of that, the moral state of a soldier in Russian army back in the 90 was really bad, because of shit that was going on in the country. Russian army now is not what it used to be
Because of Nato, the Baltics states might feel threatened as they did after they got their independence in 1918 .
"At a rate of one Belgium per year"
Did the Germans invented this standard of measure?
Ja
Da
If it were a Germany measure of rate of gain, it would funtion as a temporal rate: after 4-5 years the gain will prove to be reversed.
@@geeache1891 Minus entropy losses. Germany gets smaller every war it starts
Germany uses Poland as UOM
The problem with Russia's attitude and now behavior in Ukraine, is that they are going to discover, the hard way, that they don't call the shots anymore.The U.S. and NATO 'haven't been listening to Russia' because they don't really care about Russia, because they can see that it's got no real capacity to maintain or sustain a large conflict. It's got a gross GNP more akin to Australia.
Both Russia and America are waning. It's clearly visible in American domestic and foreign policies they're losing grip. Russia might collapse, NATO will fade into obscurity, EU is about to be building its' own army because it doesn't want to depend on either's whim anymore. Look out for China, they're playing the long game.
I just found your channel, obviously, due to recent events. Excellent insights on the situation without all the current politics coloring your presentation. Thank you in arrears!
This video makes it look like NATO has some diehard plan to invade Russia and poor Russia has no other option than to conquer its neighbors. Because, you know, for self defence and totally not because of chauvinistic imperial ambitions. All this at a time most NATO countries have hard time keeping their defence spending at minimum level. Only exceptions being NATO countries worried about massing Russian military formations near their borders and aggressive rhetoric coming from Kremlin, Greece that is more issues with Turkey and USA that has declared China as main threat.
And how is expanding their borders going to cut Russian defence expenditure? Soviet Unions defence spendigs took A MASSIVE bite from their economy, one of the reasons why it it collapsed. It is not cheap to control people and lands that really don't want to be part of you.
This video is about Russian politic (what is BS) and he make it clear. But yes. Considering how many brainwashed Russian trolls there is under this video, your reaction is understandable.
What would NATO gain by invading? All the Greens don't want the oil and even dislike the gas.
The point is that this is how the Russians see things. They've been invaded repeatedly for thousands of years. They naturally see things in these terms.
@@Will-tn8kq And people on West understand that. Problem is that after Cold War there was believe of mutual understanding that West would not invade, as it could after collapse of USSR, but didn't. All melice of Kremlin was seen as theatre for internal public. But Russia refuse helping hand, taking own falling behind as hostility and was only leaking wounds until next bait. And when it happen, it force West to again see Putin as not worthy of they trust. That is all about it.
But Russia don't have population and economy to support it's ambitions...
@Dodo no) russia is a poor country
@Dodo I think in future Russia influence will decrease due to population decline and other Rising Powers
Only india has, jai hind😎😎
@@trumpfuckbidentrumpfuckbid4859 China is in strong position to expand and they're trying their best at Indo-China border,SCS, Japanese island,Taiwan,HK etc...
When the USSR collapsed Russia basically took on all of the debts, they have now paid all those debts, have a huge surplus and sovereign wealth fund.
The Russian economy is in much better shape than you think but Russia's people have low wages.
“To know a countries geography is to know a countries foreign policy.” Very profound and wise words.
Napoleon, I think.
Canada and USA also have close to 4000km borders, but guess what we don't attack each other because we understood it's better for everyone. Putin is thinking strategic while the rest of world thinks logic.
In Argentina we often talk about the economic potential of certain provinces we have using Belgiums as a measurement unit. For example the Entre Ríos, Misiones and Neuquén provinces have the potential of 1 Belgium each.
Economy of Argentina is same size as Belgium.
@@Bruther90 He said potential. Argentines know they're bad with money.
@@casper_z1259 Its like me and my grades
Hahah, yes, he is so funny words. I believe him
Fun fact: Putin wears USSR pajamas to bed every night.
I’m trying to imagine that!!! lol 😆 Hammer and sickle and all
link for evidence?
it’s a joke
That’s funny
same
The defense doctrine of Russia is outdated and is based in its history not in the present. There are a number of problems with the Russian defense doctrine: 1. The first one is that Russia is not enticing the countries around its borders to become a buffer for the Russian heartland but forcing them to become something they don't want to and when they don't accept to become a vassal, Russia invents a conflict between some minorities in that country, intervenes militarily and imposes a new status quo by force. 2. The second one is that Russia's motivations are, at least from EU and NATO side, paranoid, unjustified: no European country and no NATO country wants to- or did- attack Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union. No EU or NATO country created any conflict in Russia. No EU or NATO country ever requested a piece of the Russian territory. The only thing they requested is that Russia withdraws its armed forces from the regions where Russia maintains separatist movements (Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abhazia, Donetsk, Lughansk) and let them live their life the way they want. Russia is a paranoid state, led by paranoid leaders, which acts aggressively against states, people and world security on pretexts unjustified by facts of recent history. Russia is a terrorist state with a terminally ill leader who plays with the atomic bombs buttons instead of caring for his health and wealth of its people.
That's where you are wrong Russians have been taught by history that their security depends on their actions,that means not being dependent on the decisions of their adversaries. This was true when they faced down the Ottomans, Central Asians, Japanese, Polish and Lithuanians, the Swedes and the Germans oh not to mention the French. you are looking at the present as if reality has somehow been suspended. Just because there are no interested parties now for Russian Territories now doesn't mean there won't be in the future, considering climate change and the rich energy reserves of Russian hinterland. Past shows what could wrong failing to learn from it is a clear and present mistake. That being said Russian demography is already really bad, so painful demise is obvious, question is do they want be able to defend their territory or be morally superior and civilized and sacrifice their future.
@@alexanderphilip1809 Or, instead of spending all their money on revitalising their military and stashing away a war fund, they could invest it into thier people to prop up education, incentivise population growth, and stablise their economy?
It’s great to have these to go back to while trying to figure out what is going on right now in Ukraine.
I mean fuck me man, I've learned so much about well, everything that is going on around the world by you it's astounding to say the least. You are a great channel and I hope you become bigger an even better at soon as possible. Cheers mate.
"preferebly Polan"... damn, here we go again
We should buy some of these Ukrainian Nukes
@@KamikazeMedias Poland is planning its civil nuclear program for the second half of the next decade, it isn't even worth mentioning the military program time frame, it's a shame would be nice to have symmetry of nuclear states in Europe (US, UK, France | Poland, Ukraine, Russia).
"What are we going to do tonight, Russia?" "The same thing we do every century, Germany, try to Partition Poland."
Poland has the most annoying neighbors
@@timhaldane7588 they are annoying only because Poland put itself in this position. You're naive if you think they all that white and fluffy.
It's pleasant when he actually mentions the Caspian Sea in a Caspian Report.
Very interesting. Thanks.
TL/DR: a country noone intends to attack is constantly trembling in fear and spends more effort on securing its borders than on wellbeing of its citizens while making enemies left and right.
This is true. Unfortunately, many believe the authorities and seriously think that everyone wants to take our lands and there are only enemies around.
Couldn't have said it better. No one wants to have anything to do with Russia
that could also be said about the united states military spending
And by extend angering everyone and speeding up own downfall, as its own population start realizing that they life and wellbeing are sacrificed for worthless territorial gains and ego stunts.
@@meepgm Yes. But world can't focus on that issue, when some stoners threat it with nukes.
Loved this analysis! Had hours worth of key takeaways, presented so concisely. Thank you, and I'm always looking forward to your next vids :)
Very well researched video. Excellent geopolitical analysis.
Excellent analysis, thanks.
*In MOTHER RUSSIA back isn't against wall - wall is against back*
Good Luck to Russia! The biggest and The fastest (hypercsonic weapons) country in humans history
Owns 11% of earth, largest country in the world: "No really we need these other 14-20 countries, this is undefendable!"
It is tough. Without its former border, you have direct road to Moscow. Without Without a strong defensive natural terrain, powerful army will have the advantages. There is a reason why modern Poland, after losing most of their defensive terrain, they always very easily invaded
either you didn't watch the video or just plain dumb
This report is stupid because it is not conected to 21st century. Today Russia has nukes, intercontinental missiles, hipersonic missiles. Russia does not need more teritories or mountines to defend itself.
"The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do." -Michael Porter, I really enjoy these thrown in quotes by Chirvan
Most insightful and topical video on youtube.
Instead of costly territorial expansion, maybe Russia’s leadership can pursue an an alternative to improve its security: making the country more economically integrated with the rest of the world. It is easier said than done, but no other method has reduced animosity between nations of different cultures and religions than free, international trade has done.
that's how europe did it, very effective if done well
The goal of the Russian government has nothing to do with country development and improving people's life, and have everything to do with protecting the corrupt system they created in order to make money from oil and gas for a small group of so called "elites", who are effectively the same ex communsts who ruled USSR. It's a simple logic of protecting and securing their assets. The government in Russia are not servants of the people, in fact, it's quite the opposite, and historically, it has always been like that. Alas.
In other words - be a good little slave to the US like the rest of the world, lest you end up like Iraq and North Korea.
So how is the US the victim in all this again? Because to me it looks like NATO is invading Russia, not the other way around. Where are NATO troops right now? On Russia's border. Where are the Russian forces? NOT on America's borders.. So you see now who is the aggressor?
@@pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 Yes, security concerns on the Russian side are legitimate, considering Russia's centuries of experience of surviving invasions. But is restoring Russia's historical sphere of influence an effective, practical counter? My answer is no.
Given their collective experience under the Iron Curtain, as well as the development gap between modern Russia (except Moscow and St.Petersburg) and EU/US, is it really surprising that eastern Europeans prefer closer relations with the latter rather than the former?
By equating embracing the global economic competition and "being a slave to the US", you are essentially underestimating the ingenuity of the Russian population. Let me remind you this is a country that produced great science and art. Also, it's the homeland of Pavel Durov, the founder of VK and Telegram; Sergey Brin, one of the founders of Google; and many more. Those people could have stayed in Russia if the economic system there allows so.
@@mingmiao364 and restoring the historical sphere of Russia is an absolute requirement for their survival.
Did you even watch _"Understanding the Russian Mindset"_ from Shirvan?? Russia is flat, and must push to the mountains, if they wish to survive the endless invasions; French invasions in the 1800s, German invasions in the 1900s, and American invasions in the 2000s (coming soon™)
Shirvan loved that last comment. "Knowing a country's geography is knowing countries foreign policy."
Napoleon I think.
Yup, CaspianReport nailed it again. o7 mate, keep up the great work.
Very insightful.
Global deforestation is about one Nepal a year, global temperature rise shall be one Saudi arabia per sixhundred years, climate refugees shall be one Bangladesh a year, global hunger is one sommalia a year
Source for your facts?
@@mohanaryal677 Trust me bruhh
@@davidbilla8063 sounds legit
Finally, units that the Russian and the Americans can both agree on.
;-;
On a live TV, when a kid asked Putin about Russia's extend or where does Russia end ?
Putin replied : "NOWHERE" 😎
You didn't get this joke. The kid asked: "Where does the border of Russia end?" And Putin joked that "the border of Russia does not end anywhere" (it closes by itself). An old joke.
But in every joke there is a part of a joke, everything else is true. This ambiguity of the answer was basically a main part of the joke.
@@limenciel6081 what?
This aged well
Great and insightful video that shines a light on the motivation behind the current war in Ukraine. Thanks!
The Germans never got to the steppe in WW1...they never got anywhere near the Volga.
1942, Yes.
The Germans made it as far as Rostov-on-Don in WW1, east of Ukraine.
@@tritium1998 I think that was after Trotsky bailed from the talks then the German Army just said OK....and walked a couple hundred miles until Lenin gave them Brest Livotsk.
Volgograd it is Stalingrad, in that city Stalin defeated the white collaborationists.
I enjoy the very pragmatic, and to-the point-strategy discussions in this. By speaking the truth of the matter, clarity of meaning, and thereby an easier uptake of understanding makes this one of the best geopolitical overview videos i've seen in some time.
U will never knew the truth. Thats fact!!
Phenomenal report, Shirvan!
What this video didn't address is why non-alignment or de-escalation is unpalatable for Russia. I simply do not understand why there is a fear of invasion when there is zero political will anywhere in Western Europe to invade Russia. In fact, most seem purely interested in maintaining a military for defensive purposes, rather than fielding an offensive military, and many now without a draft system have had faltering military recruitment.
The only counter I can imagine would be to bring up the NATO involvement in the Yugoslav Civil War. Still, that was a very different situation from Ukraine after the Euromaidan protests and crisis. It would be one thing if NATO had stuck around in former Yugoslavia and was there purely offensively, but they ostensibly stabilized the region. Russia's involvement in Ukraine has done anything but stabilize the region because Russia is clearly not a neutral party and has a vested interest in absorbing Ukraine so they have a foothold in the Black Sea for a warm water naval port.
czcams.com/video/HE6rSljTwdU/video.html
He explained it here long time ago.
Bringing up NATO in the Yugoslav war is basically expecting the reader to be ignorant of what happened. There were the UN safe zones in Bosnia that NATO was tasked to protect, and there was the ethnic cleansing of Albanians in Kosovo by Milosevic that NATO stopped. Everything else was a civil war.
Russia: Feels as it has its back against the wall
Also Russia: By far the largest country in the world both in Europe and Asia
You didn't get anything from the vid lol.
@@marko1263 r/woosh
@@svampen7782 this is not reddit my guy
@@JavierSanchez-zj6su not even for the meme. ur a fkn boomer.
@@svampen7782 1. i’m sixteen
2. The meme is dead
3. The meme was never funny to begin with
The world: *exist*
Russia: I feel threatened. I must EXPAND!
Makes sense though. The US is obviously not satisfied until it dominates the world. I mean, every other country that tried to willingly side with the soviets were invaded. The US put nukes right next to the soviets, and when they tried to return the favor we threatened Armageddon.
We are the bad guys.
@@charles8769 Maybe you, but not me. :D
I'M EXPOOOOOOOOOOOMING
I don't even think they feel threatened, they just wanna expend, that's all. They blatantly lie. They should first provide for the poor population 1st, but with right-wingers that want an empire back, what can one expect? 🙄
@@livics610 It has nothing to do with left and ring wing. The communist were extremely left wing and yet they still wanted to expand their influence and border.
"....preferably into Poland"
An expression that can be heard during explanation of any strategy on any world conflict.
"Ah shit, here we go again"
lol
This is an excellent analysis! Spot on!
The single greatest explanation of Russian defense doctrine I've seen around! Confratulations! Great work!
Yup. That was truly museum experience.
Unfortunately the doctrine influences where to invest. All of the former Soviet States that were buffer zones for Moscow were investment free unless they had a mineral wealth. I remember stories from Iowa farmers who went to Bulgaria after the Soviet System dissolved. Those farmers were amazed that the Bulgarians were so far behind and lacked so much modern equipment.
@@rustyyb8450 It is part of the Russia Imperialistic doctrine. They deliberately drain those regions through uneven trade deals and corruption, so they neither could threat Russia itself or provide supply to marching armies of the enemy. That is also source of conflict on Ukraine. Due to historical independence of Kiev Russia. Attempt to establish puppet ruler failed and because Ukrainians kept mobility in Europe, they start realizing harm caused to them by Moscow. Especially as Poland which was poorer prior to collapse of USSR, become way richer then them.
I like the idea of using Belgium as a unit of measure for territorial expansion as in "expanded at a rate of 1 Belgium per year."
Extremely useful, thank you
So If Italy decides to regain the Roman borders this should be okay, right?
Israel did it why not
Shit why not?
Now this would make many people happy
The inheritance of the tsarist Russia was expansions of buffers. When new land was conquered, that land needed a buffer for its protection. Russia simply grew too big. Seeing the protectable area of former USSR in central asia, begs the question, why did they go further? Why invade Afghanistan?
*They should have settled more in Kazakhstan and Baltic states*
@@Zeyede_Siyum The Russians? Sure, I'm all for diversity. On that point Stalin did a huge mistake to move the Volga Germans to Kazakhstan. They were loyal to the cause, not to Germany. The same thing with Russian speaking populations outside of Russia, they are human beings that won't stand to be puppets for long. You can fool some people sometimes, but you can not fool all the people all the time.
Initially Afghanistan was led by a fellow socialist regime which then was supported when the Islamists started overthrowing them, also thanks to the CIA which armed the Mujahedin prior to that. The USSR effectively got set up and did let provoke themselves into that war. This is supported by the memoirs of Robert Gates. The Soviets were in fact correct when stating that they were merely intervening to combat US interventionism in Afghanistan.
Googling "The Brzezinski Interview with Le Nouvel Observateur (1998)" gives more details on this.
The main goal of afghan invasion is not for buffer, they already have natural barrier in central asia. The invasion of aghan is to expand influence because by that time they no longer "seeking buffer zone" they want to destroy america and spread communism to the entire world
Also mimicking what Kushan empire did back then, connecting them to india ocean. Means their plan was pakistan after afghanistan. A bold move that US tried to prevent by any cost which goes by supporting taliban. 😉
I love how u used a protest in slovenia for a picture on russia. Truly well done :D
Well, fuck.
😂😂😂😂
"The soviets shaped their borders with diligence" - what did they shape, if they just inherited all those lands from the Empire?
To be fair, they sliced and diced the former Emirates in Central Asia to make them codependent
You are mistaken, sir. The borders are familiar, because the 'geo' in geopolitcs is very important.
For the most part, russia as a country was a dissoluted zombie by 1918-1920.
Everyone and their distant cousins went independent, and the soviet union had to basically reconquer/conquer everything they understood they needed
Actually the soviets reconquered all these lands
@@diogomm710 this is correct. Even Ukraine and Belarus were militarily independent (though unrecognised) and the soviets had to basically redo a few centuries’ worth of conquest (albeit far less challenging)
@@diogomm710 It's called civil war, and the strongest faction wins. All the territory that Soviet Union constituted was former imperial Territory, nothing more, at least until ww2. And if you start considering what territories the Soviets actually "shaped", the Brest Litovsk treaty shows clearly that geopolitics mattered little for them. It is historical accident that they didn't have to obey that treaty and didn't get limited to the rsfsr borders early on.
To know a nation's geography is to know its foreign policy.
Good Luck to Russia! The biggest and The fastest (hypercsonic weapons) country in humans history
What an incredible lesson this was, thank you!
Russia ( Vladimir Putin , more accurately) needs to realize that former soviet republics are not theirs by contrived right or supposed historical precedence. The people of those regions have the inailable right to chose their own destiny.
Completely agree. California and Texas should be returned to Mexico.
Moscow may want to think about developing good relations with its neighbors. Naaa...
CIA joined the chat:
Psss: oposition, wanna some guns and money to revolt?. Russians are scary.
Psss: neo nazis, wanna some money and guns?.
White House joined the chat:
Psss: hey Russian neighbors I have more expensive stuff to sell you than that cheap Russian resources. It would be a shame to not buy me, here some sanctions so you get whose the boss.
Russia wants good relations with the west, they want to be our trade partners after all, there's just countries such as the USA which can't stand the sight of countries like Germany importing Gas, oil and metals Form Russia, they will keep sabotaging the Russo-European relationship at all cost, after all if the Europeans start realizing Russia isn't a threat they will question why the U.S. Has bases in their countries...
It's just the opposite. A prosperous Russia ,well integrated into the global economy is the last thing the West wants. The US and Europe are determined to keep NATO going at all costs.
@@SangiinKherem
Invading Ukraine under the auspices of "separatists" is the reality check against "not a treat."
@@ianmackenzie686 Firstly Russia did not invade the Ukraine if that were the case there would be all out war between those countries and Ukraine would have been conquered within a few days... Secondly the country being threatened is Russia, they are the ones who have NATO on their border an alliance whose combined defence spending shadows Russias GDP, an alliance which threatens Russias heartland where 70% of its population live which is just a massive undefendable plain, tell me why do you think that Russia wants to invade eastern Europe? Do you think they don't have enough space to live? Do you think there isn't enough food? Does Russia need more resources?
Russia - bad
Nato - good
Guys… we don’t live in a Disney movie
Nope, we live in a 'Universal' movie.
Getting more like a DC comicbook every day.
Amazing analysis, one on the heart of what's at stake, quite illuminating for me... CONGRATULATIONS!
"To know a nation's geography is to know it's foreign policy " Excellent observation.