AMD RDNA 4 RX 8000 Leaked Specs, Price, & Release Date
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2024
- Thanks to Vip-cdkdeals for sponsoring this video. 30% off code: GPC20
▬ Windows 10 pro ($17):www.vip-cdkdea...
▬ Windows 11 pro($23):www.vip-cdkdea...
▬ Windows 10 home ($14):www.vip-cdkdea...
▬ Office 2016($28):www.vip-cdkdea...
▬ Office 2019($47):www.vip-cdkdea...
SUPPORT My Work & Get Discord Access: / thedisplayguy
AMD RDNA 4 RX 8000 Leaked Specs, Price, & Release Date
AMD is gearing up to release their RDNA 4 based GPUs including the 8800 XT, 8700 XT, 8600 XT, and 8600 at much lower prices if leaks are to be believed. Not only that, but with better performance, especially in raytracing, these GPUs could be a really great option for many gamers across the world.
Sources
RDNA 4 Leaks: videocardz.com...
RDNA 4 Info: • RDNA 4 LEAKED! RX 8000...
CES 2025: x.com/Kepler_L...
AMD 3D VCache: videocardz.com...
FULL DISCLOSURE
Amazon has given me affiliate links which send me a percentage of each purchase when you use them. Additionally all Vip-cdkdeals links are sponsored.
END DISCLOSURE
Specs
Camera: Sony FX3: amzn.to/3VWS45H
RAM: 64GB Gskill DDR5: amzn.to/3F1Pa6j
CPU: Ryzen 7 7800X3D: amzn.to/4czpHAf
GPU: PNY XLR8 RTX 4090: amzn.to/3REwP6n
Storage: Kingston 4TB Renegade SSD: amzn.to/3OXvdlz
Case: Lian Li O11 EVO: amzn.to/3VUscF3
Music
www.davidcutte...
Outro: Everyone by Monplaisir
Thanks to Vip-cdkdeals for sponsoring this video. 30% off code: GPC20
▬ Windows 10 pro ($17):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/GPC20w10
▬ Windows 11 pro($23):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20w11
▬ Windows 10 home ($14):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20wh
▬ Office 2016($28):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20of16
▬ Office 2019($47):www.vip-cdkdeals.com/vck/gpc20off19
SUPPORT My Work & Get Discord Access: patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy
Amd is doing great but expecting a 7900xt+ for 399 is delusional. It'll cost 499 and it will be great
This is what I'm expecting as well.
Yes
this is similar to people being disappointed that the b980 is worse than a 4080 super and will rather be competing with the 4070 ti for 399 like what are you expecting? even if it was 599 its still pretty good
I think you are a bit optimistic. I expect the 8600XT to be $279, the 8700XT to be $399, and the 8800XT tp be $549. Of course, street pricing could be adjusted to compete with Battlemage.
@@dalesplitstone6276 BM hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.....right
8800xt needs to be better than 7900xtx performance to make it worth changing my 6800xt, 😢
bruh u got a nice card, i have the gtx 1650💀 4gb vram and i like to play pcvr☠ , you can wait 2 or 3 more years to but the 9800 xt, belive me, technology is growing super fast
I won't say "Really really better",but at least will have better RT cores...
I have the same card. Though contemplating upgrading to 7900, but not sure if i should upgrade now, or wait for the next one.
@dippychips don't think the 7900 is worth it, I will wait to see what 8800xt brings but if its not at least a 40% improvement then I will just hang on for the next gen
@@paulbaddiley7326 Yeah i get what you mean.. though price will most likely be around $799+ i recon for the 8000 series.. 6800 is gonna last for the next 4-5 years and will still be great either way. I will wait as well and see how it compares
4080 super performance for $399. say that out loud without laughing
I just laughed hard after reading this!!! 🤣 😂
@@castle2k007 and I smil 😊 when I read this 😮
Nah 4070Ti/7900XT performance at under 225W, with better ray tracing and AI for 400-500$
GTX Titan Black cost $1000, released Q1 2014.
GTX 980 cost $500, released Q4 2014.
GTX 980 is approx. 15~17% faster.
So, okay, maybe it won't be $400, it's kind of too sweet to be true (although heavily depends on what Intel rolls out), but half the 4080's MSRP at same performance is what they need to not keep loosing market share to Intel. Especially if they still won't match 4080 in ray/path tracing.
@@enricofermi3471 The titan cards just like the 90 class cards were overpriced to oblivion on purpose and with an obvious overpricing.
What kinds of magic is the 8800xt pushing to out perform a card with 31% more stream processors, 25 % more bandwidth, 40 percent more memory processing speed. The 7900Xt can clock to 3GHz. The processing uplift is 13% of 31 percent less stream processors. On paper this looks like BS.
And 20% less VRAM.
hype magic. ages like milk in the sun after release
It’s happened again and again over the three decades of GPUs. The last time nvidia revamped its architecture was with Maxwell in 2015. Most recently, RDNA nuked GCN thanks to an architectural shift doubling the frame output per cycle which improved EVERYTHING gaming wise and less so data processing wise. If AMD is targeting the AI market, which they damn well should be because that’s where the money is waiting for them, then they need to tackle how matrix operations are carried out in the same way and that would be done via lateral communication on the GPU die as well as how instructions are sent to the die via bit rate vs frequency. These gamer cards are just a bottom line to fund experiments for their data accelerators.
@@RagedGecko I think the biggest issue for me will be the limited vram of 16 GB at best. HB showed games @ 4K with all the bells and whistles in settings pushing over 16GBs. They are seeing a downturn in DYI and that will continue and having failed at the update at the high end they went with price consciousness and what you wrote of. I'm all for that, but don't pull my leg on it being a better card than my 7900 XT. I am also going to keep my 7900 XTX as well, because of the 24GBs. I like the bells and whistles.
The 5700XT with 40CUs and 1905Mhz clock speed was as fast as the Vega VII with 60CUs and 1850Mhz clock speed.
rumours and speculations are fun and all, but i can not do much with it, reviews and final priced where i live is needed to show what it does.
Ryzen 9700G with 16-32 CUs would hit hard. Shame it probably won`t exist, maybe, who knows ? SFF have a place in my heart.
I AM PRETTY SURE THIS MOVE AMD IS DOING IS ABOUT INTEL'S UPCOMING BATTLEMAGE, NOT NVIDA.
if the sell the 8800XT for 399... and it performs...it will boost market share.... all the well off nerds buying 5090s is the small minority
But they can't afford an RX 8800 XT for $399, and they'd need insane quantity at a similar price to boost market share. This ain't happening. Excess capacity is better leveraged in Pro market with MI300+ or Threadrippers.
We'd be lucky if they have it at $500, thankfully, it likely won't be over $650.
@@mickaelsflow6774 i think that the card wont be higher priced than 550$ but yes, i dont think either that it will cost 400$
@@roluplay4359 that's a much more sensible price, yes.
@@mickaelsflow6774 Yeah I expect between $500-550 for 8800 XT.
yea, you lost your mind. 8800xt would most likely be a little slower than the 7900xt, but still great if it's 399.
While surpassing the XTX, amd probably 4080 in raytracing, which is very important for the industry and consoles
7900XT may have about 30% more CU, but 8800XT has about 40% higher clock speed. If there's any architectural improvements, 8800XT could possibly be equal or slightly faster than 7900XT in raster and way faster in RT. As for the pricing, 399 is wishful, 7800XT was launched at 499. 8800XT would already be considered aggressive if its priced at 449.
Looks like my Red Devil 6950xt is staying an extra year with me..
Same I got the xfx version it's still doing amazing for 1440p the only game it struggled with was hellblade 2
@@Pacifica_909 Really... Everything I throw at mine, it devours... A really good card! Looking at a 7900xtx red devil but they really expensive right now! Not sure about gigabyte..
@@Pacifica_909 Really? I have yet to find a game to make my Devil struggle! It's eating everything on it's path! The only game I played that goes under 100fps @1440 144hz maxed out was GTA V with 90 so far. (I have yet to try cyberpunk or Metro Exodus)
Both Nvidia and AMD leaks are shaky at best. AMD has a very consistent track record of falling short of both leaks and expansions. Those prices are never going to happen. There will be to much remaining 7900xt stock for AMD to make them completely irrelevant and literally lose money.
Well what is aggressive pricing we are paying 400 for a 4060 to play 1080 gaming, probably going to be paying 550 for a 5060 for 1080 gaming I would call that aggressive pricing.
Your reservation in a padded room with "special" jacket has been confirmed.
Where did you get those TFlops data? They are all wrong
This man has built his entire career on giving gamers false hope. Shameful.
looks like i'm going to wait till 2025
Same. It will be the year I get another AMD build but for the 1st time an actual AMD gpu.
Not sure what pricing aggressively means, but if 8800XT is priced cheaper than 7800XT, then i do think we have a winner.
I highly disagree with Q1 2025 release estimate. First the old target window was Q4 of 2024 then they allegedly pushed it back because RDNA 3 stock but by pushing it back they are dangerously close to BattleMage that depending on the performance might force them to aggressively lower their prices. Thus best marketing strategy would be to take the Q4 2024 release that would allow you to take advantage of Christmas/BlackFriday sales with no competition. Only reason they would not go with this strategy would be that there is no availability or their drivers are not ready. On the pricing RX 8800XT would easily sell at RX 7900GRE price point with slightly higher raster performance than RX 7900XT and with greatly improved RT performance. To me aggressive pricing for 8800XT would mean around 650-600$ range then taking that price point and inferring from previous generation launch pricing highly likely RX 8700XT would be around 500$ that would also make lot of sense if it can slightly beat RX 7800XT in raster and offer way better RT performance. In no world would company fully transfer the cost savings to consumer especially when there is still very high inflation.
All sounds plausible, except the "best marketing strategy". AMD doesn't do that with the Radeon division anymore. Not since the "incident". :P
@@mickaelsflow6774 Been so that I've forgot are we talking about Vega 56 availability ?
I think it is concerning weight isn’t being published.
Frames per watt in game X using X settings. That's the only way to measure these things fairly. If anyone thinks they've got a better suggestion, feel free to accept that you're wrong.
7900XTX or 40480 performance at $500 and definitely I'm in. Hopefully Nvidia does it because it doesn't look like AMD can.
Nvidia? Hahahaha you're funny. Their 3050 6gb is the same price as 6600 even now and you think they will lower their price? Lol
@@fayis4everlove I get your point, but the 5700xt did it for $350 when I puchased it on launch. It was darn close to a 2080 non super. If AMD's new mid range only can get as close to the 5080 as the 5700xt (adjusted for inflation) did to the 2080 it would be a game changer. I know, never going to happen.
@@fancycavegaming620 it's rumored to be close to the 4080 with drastically improved raytracing.
I don't know how the RT performance will land, but I'm expecting the 8800XT to have better RT than the 7900xtx (4070 Super equivalent in RT)
@@fancycavegaming620 it'll only matter for new consumers, people used to nvidia will never switch to amd and there are fanboys who care about the nvidia features. Nvidia already made their territory, once it happens it doesnt matter what they do, they'll always win.
It might even increase with the RTX 5000s. Im sure they are preparing another feature that will make people buy the 5000s (probably IA based)
The 4nm process is more expensive than 5nm so I doubt the cost will reduce, certainly not $399 for a 7900XT equivalent. Best case is that it will lower the price of the 4080 Super but I doubt that as well.
Let's just hope Q1 means in January rather than March. Those delays are very frustrating and it's already an L that they will miss the Christmas market.
I'll be making a new ryzen system in december and for the first time, I'm considering keeping my 1070ti just a few more weeks until the 8800 drops. It would be a shame not to, but if it drops in March... I don't know.
Everyone needs to buy their new GPU right now. & Sit next gen out for both companies. The only way these prices will ever stop is rising.
Besides the fact that pricing doesn't work like that...why should a company sell a competitor to the 4080, a $1000 card, for half the price or less?!! It's not 2015 anymore, there are no $300 midrange gpus.
It's copium. Copium mixed in with a dash of Hopium all the way down to the comments. Critical thinking be damned.
And this obsession with "AMD needs to capture market share"... madness, I tells ya'!
8800XT looks great even at $500.
I think it'll be more like 550 or higher...so it'll replace the 7900 GRE and it's best feature will be more power efficiency and better stability due to the hardware being of better quality then RDNA 3.
It should be a decent card...but I don't see them pricing this well. Prob will have to wait 3+ months for it to make sense.
@@ofon2000 yeah i think that it will cost like 500$, i wish that 400$ was true but it is crazy...
@@roluplay4359 I'm thinking base 550 580 and good aib models will be around 600+
AMD *needs* to up their ray/path tracing. 7900XTX may successfully compete with 4080 in raster, but as soon as the paths start tracing, it's a bottom tier. And unlike 2019-2020 period, it's no longer a gimmick for a couple of games, now almost every high-profile title has an above-ultra "ray tracing" setting in the options.
The software company knows its business. However not many gamers really care or utilize ray tracing. Some even go to say they don't care about the dry wet pavement look it brings. If the xtx can remain the consumers choice and price accordingly than it has its place and a very sturdy stance in that market. Though it does have great output. The watt/frame ratio doesn't justify the price. Imo
I know you are going by rumors. But AMD said about 6-8 months ago they were only releasing midrange cards and the 8000 will be cheaper but not faster. I look for these to be like 1080p cards. Maybe 1440p at best.
i’m holding out till rdna 5
I cant wait to see amd go full circle and release a 9800xt a successor to the legendary 9800pro from when i started pc gaming. At the time that was the beast of all gpu's
If the 8800xt is $399, I might upgrade my 7800xt to it. It's not much of an upgrade but I can afford it and I want AMD to stay in the graphic market.
The RT performance upgrade would be huge thou.
not that much probably but I would totally appreciate even a minor upgrade to not any improvement at all
that's why I also would upgrade my 7900gre to an 8800xt@@skychaos87
edit:
or do you think the over-all performance of the 7900gre would still top the performance of an 8800xt in 1440p? if so i would keep my current gpu.
$399 would be an amazing price for it as I expect $499.
No way it will be $399.
No GPU releases in 2024??
The 7900GRE sort of released in 2024.
If this will be true and the 8800xt will be as fast as the 7900xt it will be a steal and the old performance target that we saw in the past is coming back: 300-400$ GPUs which are almost as fast as the XX80 gpu of the previous generation.
Edit: all this things look quite true because if you also look what amd did with the rx 6800, is very similar, 300-400$ price range and almost the same performance of an rtx 3080. This was the old XX60s performance target which we don't see since rtx 2000
I got big doubt his numbers are accurate, but i sure hope so.
@@ilbro7874 oh they aren't, don't worry about that.
Well, if Moore law is dead's predictions and inside infos are correct (which they usually are), meaning focusing on improving of RT performance and pricing info from this channel then we could have nice set of Radeon 8xxx cards. Looking forward to the outcome of this in next year...
If it is indeed priced aggressively I may decide to do a whole new build with am5 also.. got me thinking.
what happens when they get to 9000 series since that already exists but is 15 years old
The 9000 series from AMD is from 2002
@@badass6300 oh then its 22 years old
Maybe they'll just add another 0
You are on bath salts with these prices. Will RDNA4 be priced aggressively? Yes. But not 399 for 8800xt. It will be at MINIMUM 500, and most likely 550. 8700XT will be 400 and 12gb VRAM
Could you do a breakdown of how AMD & NVIDIA stack up for AI & Machine Learning? I recently got into this space, and bought my first PC Build. The problem is I’m stuck between Data Scientists who over complicate everything and PC Master Race who won’t shut up about an imaginary world that doesn’t really exist in real life.
I think they'll reduce the MSRP but not much, maybe $600 for the 8800xt, $450 for the 8700xt, and $400 for the 8600xt. Just because they can make them cheaper, doesn't mean thet'll pass the savings to you.
its gonna suck bad in benchmark...8800xt is lot slower than 7900xt that is been reported that MSI is not making any amd gpu's for this reason...they saying its really suck in performance is not worth to make it at all...that is msi words ...and AMD is not happy with msi decision
MSI is not making AMD gpus because MSI never cared for AMD cards at all. Did you look at the MSI version of the 6900xt for example? IT was horrendous. It was by FAR the worst 6900xt on the market.
8800xt wont be slower than 79000xt lmao jesus...
@@user78405 MSI and Asus hate amd
Cautiously optimistic, but we've been burned by AMD before with "Wait for Vega." And of course the old saying, "Another Massive Disappointment."
It's unprecedented how many leaks and how long these companies are taking to release their new products,
I will wait until i see benchmarks and so on, i will be saving up for a 7900xtx and will see when the 8800xt comes out, if i can get a 8800xt that gives 150% performance for a much lower price, i will go for it, but right now, 7900xtx is my target.
If the leaked specs are accurate, this will be a mid range card around 300mmsq, AMD currently prices that much silicon at 500usd. Expecting it to cost less than that would be stupid. I also think they should call it the 8700xt and leave the door open for a flagship card mid cycle refresh. A 70 class card should perform as well as last gen flagship, so that would repair their branding as well.
A sane person in the comments! RDNA3 and they pulled the XTX and GRE... I don't have much hope for them to be sensible here.
If they name it RX 8800 XT, I'll already be happy. I fear for an XTX naming already. I couldn't be hoping for a sensible RX 8700 XT as their top-end next year.
late we knew that amd was coming with this banger since december 2023.
I remember 2018 and the same stories about the NAVI RDNA and etc and then the 2019 and the disappointment . Nvidia ripped it so bad that the NVIDIA CEO even made instagram videos basically mocking AMD. And by the way im A All in AMD fun-boy bot I am just being real. Unsure about the future but Im very sure about the past at least 10 years
I've read AMDs found big Ray-Tracing improvements, so it looks like if price is right you will get an RTX4080 level performance for RTX4060 price. AMD need this for November 2024 but it will kill RDNA3 sales unless they slash there prices. I could see AMD doing a RDNA4 refresh with faster memory small clock bump. It's a shame GPUs are so locked down and partners can't push performance with better cooling and power like evga used too.
Your channel name should be Mentally challenged not graphically.. I should make his channel go away in my feed after i post this but here it is.
You saying the 7700/7800 die size is 30% larger is wrong. The GCD is 200mm² (about 30-45mm² smaller than the monolithic RDNA chip) and the cache makes up the remainder of the size. Cache is relatively high yield compared to GPU core dies sooooo No there will not be a massive price drop, at least right away.
Also I have big questions about AMD using such weak memory for their biggest version of RDNA4. RDNA3 gets its biggest gains from overclocking memory and you are telling me they pushed clock speed A FULL FUCKING GHZ while at the same time lowering the peak memory speed. Yup no thanks.
I got duped into buying RDNA3, I won't hold out hope for them to learn anything anytime soon on the GPU front.
I'd love to believe it, but I've been let down by GPU rumors enough to know that I shouldn't
Wtf are these specs? The leaker has snapped.
RX6600XT: 2048SP 128BIT, RX7600XT: 2048SP 128BIT, RX8600XT: 2048SP 128BIT, AMD has kept their promise to gamers that the RX?600XT will always 2048SP, and 128bit memory interface, unlike NVIDIA
@@yuan.pingchen3056I just ate a 1200 calorie pizza all by myself.
Do you speak like a radio dj in casual conversation?
While I do hope you are right about the pricing I very much doubt they will be that cheap. I hope to be wrong about it though. The problem is the lack of competition in the market. Not only are consumers stuck with just a few manufacturers constantly balancing prices on what the other is doing, but those manufacturers are deliberately reducing stock right now of the current GPUs. This is so the launch of the next gen products goes to a market that is 'hungry' and thus the seller can raise the price. I'd add another $150 on those prices and you would still spin it as 'aggressive pricing'.
another reason amd delaying til march 2025 is put gpu behind them quickly when rdna5 release 2025 summer and only 2 highend chip release for rdna5....rnda4 is too embarrassing for amd to release it now...when releasing late ...nobody gonna remember how bad the chips are
Embarrassed, highly doubt embarrassed is the reason
This looks like a midrange price reset. Nothing ground breaking performance wise but a price revelation. The die is around $80-85. And 8gb vram is what 13.00? So the kits sold at 100% margin would be about $220.00. 75.00 for cooler and $20 pcb
True, this is definitely what they are going for so the prices have to be right.
In a sense, the price reset makes better tech more accessible, that can be viewed as tech progress
You lot really are building yourselves up for disappointment huh. Think like a business, not like gamers/buyers.
These prices and this strategy does NOT help AMD. In any way whatsoever.
Man if AMD comes out swinging with an 8800XT that's close to 7900XTX performance for $400 I'm buying one asap. With the current trend I wouldn't be that surprised if they ended up just had it out for $600-700 and are like "well it's better" and then be surprised when nobody buys them after nvidia drops their price to $50-100 more than them.
Well i am waiting for something with the power of 4080 for 400 bucks to upgrade from my 3080, the only problem being the reports about amd gpus still crashing while playing vr games. Since no famous hw tester on youtube actually tests vr games, i have no idea if its true.
What I want is an RX 8900 XTX. But if that's not possible, 8800 XT seems attractive too.
I think if these get some solid revues AMD might have a shot of slowing down Nvidia for a bit. Nvidia while being the best has lately been doing small upgrades with each new card release but charging hundreds of dollars more for them. Hopefully AMD does well here to give Nvidia some price competition.
These price expectations are so optimistic. AMD has been too happy to charge only barely better value compared to Nvidia for years now.
Now granted AMD DOES need to make profit to be sustainable, and cutting prices has proven to only go so far against a competitor with so much more of the market it’s actually less cost to them to match price cuts in return. PLUS both Nvidia and AMD are netting so much larger margins on the AI boom. I’m astounded they’re even paying attention to gaming concerns lately.
My expectation is if this “8800XT” (as we assume they’re going to call it) ends up roughly on par with the 4070ti including in RT, it’s VERY hard for me to see it releasing for under $600. AIB models will likely move up to $700, maybe more. If I see a release MSRP announced any lower my expectation will shift to it still being quite cut down on RT performance relative to Nvidia…which I honestly rather expect anyway. Even if the RT is basically still 7000-series level but raster is roughly 4070ti/7900XT I’d expect a release price close to $500.
The only way we see $400 is if there’s almost no RT improvement and raster only around the 7900GRE. Which marketing and competition convo aside, is about the only scenario where I wouldn’t have any point in buying one. Even if I…still probably will lol.
mistake not 399 its 1399
The rx 7600 xt is already 75% the performance of the Rx 7700 xt
75%+ of a 7800 XT, not 7700 XT.
@@GraphicallyChallenged ohhh nvm, my fault dude that’d be lowkey really good. Also love the content dude keep up the amazing videos
RADEON BEST !!!
I'd be stoked if
8600xt 249
8700xt 349
8800xt 449
Great prices if true as I would expect a tad higher for 8700 XT and 8800 XT.
8000 series cards are cursed, especially on the Nvidia side
@5:54 I can never not look at these reference models and not be reminded of Team Rocket haha. AMD seriously needed to be pricing more aggressively for a long time and stop launching prices just a hair shy of NVIDIA and making 0 sales then dropping prices after they get a heap of negative press. We shall see. I want to upgrade my 6900xt but I'm wary of the new NVIDIA power connectors and tbh all the 4000 series are to expensive as is the 7900xtx for the increase in performance at 4k
I'm holding out for the 8800 XT... Let's hope it can deliver on Ray tracing
Its a BIG mistake to miss the Christmas season, thats when I could afford it...too bad. I hope the 8600xt will have 16gb and be a good bit faster than the 7600xt.
8600 XT needs to be around 7700 XT-6800 performance for a good uplift.
@@masterlee1988 I am betting it will be about 7700xt levels which is fine for my PC.
@@masterlee1988 7700xt with 16gb ram would be great.
Until a card comes to market that can 2x my 3080 10GB for under $600 I'm not interested in upgrading. The cost of gpus is ridiculous and has been since the nvidia 20 series. I'm hoping people start boycotting $1000+ cards, to then make these corporations take note, so we can see some real price/performance wars.
😂😂😂😂 Not with inflation
@@meekmeads 🙄🙄🙄🙄you do realise that inflation doesn't halt progress right? So, unless some disaster befalls the human race, some day there will be a $600 card that's 10x faster than a 4090. Then guess what....some day there will be a card 100x faster than that for even less money!
Please keep your vapid comments to yourself.
The 7800XT will hardly be a year old and much, much, cheaper when the next gen drops.
This would be sane pricing. Will juice the used market too.
Don't mind me, I'm just mashing 0 on the keyboard over and over
400 dollar 8800XT thats 15% off a 7900XTX? are you trying to give Nvidia fanboys ammunition here?
I do love your videos as you’re always hyped up and look to the bright side of things, but man please tell us what you’re smoking.
#copium mostly
I wish you were right, however, I think AMD is going to be silly.
Radeon RX-8800XT-Platinum = $579.99 (Like the 5700XT-Platinum, just a minimally faster version of the 8800XT, with a very limited release, 95% of the time faster than 7900XTX)
Radeon RX-8800XT = $499.99 (I'd imagine RX-7900XTX performance, give or take 7%)
Radeon RX-8700XT = $379.99 (I'd imagine RX-7900GRE performance)
Radeon RX-8600XT = $229.99 (I'd imagine RX-6800XT performance)
Radeon RX-8500XT = $169.99 (A further cut down 8600XT, with 8GB/12GB of RAM, and performance like a 7600XT or 6750XT.
Odds are real low for anything anywhere near RX 7900 GRE performance.
I expect a more realistic $399 midrange card as the 8700XT 16GB with performance being a lot closer to an RX 7800 non-XT. $499 for a Radeon RX 8700XTX with a factory overclock and 20GB of GDDR6 VRAM with performance on par with the RX 7800XT.
AMD will not be releasing anything even close to a 7900 class GPU.
The amount of discount CD key advertisements is approaching VPN levels ..
As a youtuber .. you could help by finding something less saturated to hawk us.
so a 32gb 8900 xtx?
If there was a 8900 xtx it would likely be 24GB but using GDDR7 not GDDR6
@@Qelyn I can live with that. With monitor g9 57 hopefully 130hz on it
n4p ist not 30% denser it is nearly 6% at logic
nvidia claims 30% more dense vs nvidia 4n node because of smaller Si in blackwell that has nothing to do with density on n4p node
lets speculate
amd choose also denser si from 256bit to 128bit half the size vs n32 if you add all n6 node in n5 as a monolith.
all n6 imc chips combined add the 200mm² die shrink sized 346mm² n32 chip
n4p vs n5 is nearly 6 % chip estimate ruffly 273mm² at maxed one n48 rdna4 chip equals 62$ vram with gddr6 sku at min 415$ with gddr7 min 560$
you see gddr7 not worth it therefor 256bit si more likely chip size maximum of 334mm² chip maxed 84$ with gddr6 mem sku at 480$
Bandwith is similar if you choose 128bit with 32gbps or 256bit with 18gbps and gddr7 32gbps is not available until q2 2025 and thats why i doubt that rdna4 has gddr7
So GDDR7 is expensive and not worth it and n4p node cost around the same as n6 last 2 years ago therefor smaller Si makes no sense
so speculate chips
n44 around 176mm² 37$ (sku at 269$)
n48 around 334mm² 84$ and 64$
So 8600 is going to be a 7800. And still running 128 bus....better be cheap. 8700+ looks good.
So if you already have a 7700xt-7900xtx this generation is dead on arrival? Cool..
THIS DOESNT SOUND LIKE XT lmao
I'll pay $450 for a 7900xtx when the 8000 releases
Maybe used
Aw snap
Well, if they consume this much, I ain't interested. Where'd you get those estimate?
(Erm... 399$?! Surely you jest, my good sir.)
Tmr he will have bad news 😂
they are pushing RX8600 to 1440p 144hz gaming?
No
I thought N4P had the same density as N5, but was better in freq and power. Those dies sound too small to be true for that performance unless AMD is cranking them past 4GHz.
3.4GHz is getting close to 40% faster on clock speed alone. Also I believe they are monolithic instead of 5/6nm.
Clickbait again. thanks, dingus
for me AMD has already won just look at prices to performance compare to nvidia. I am glad i made the changes i will be staying with AMD.
The new cards look a little weak to me.
Why is it, every cycle the same words come out of speculators mouths? I will believe AMD (for the record I run a full AMD machine) will compete at the high end, let alone win... When they do... Also I half expect to see pigs with wings that day. But that it just an aside!
rdna4 wont come out until ces 2025 , so nnvidia will relese rtx5000 series in october that will put preasure on amd to lower prices of 7800xt and 7900xt and xtx ,
rx7800xt for $400 and rx7900xtx to $600 just to compete with rtx5070 8gb version, now if rtx5070 end up as fast as rtx4090 then ......
RIP amd.
no rt, just raster?
curse them for x8 pci-e
I need the 8900 xtx to better my 6900 xtx SE
I picked the 32bit memory interface RDNA4 graphics card....take my money and shut up!!! I haven't buy a 32 bit graphics card for a long long time, since the Tseng's Lab ET4000W32/PCI
i dont believe anything u say
It's just a speculation video noting more, lol no one should take these guys seriously
I think is not going to be more than a 15% perf. uplift from the 7000 series, with MAYBE some better RT handling, like Nvidia's 3000 series, lol 😂
With another R$ 330,00 entry level card 🤣
More bull from this channel