Eurovision 2019 | VOTING Simulation | OLD SYSTEM of presentation the results
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 07. 2019
- This is how the results of the Grand Final of Eurovision Song Contest 2019 would be present with the old system (from ESC2016 to ESC2018) of announcing the televoting.
- Zábava
I just prefer this because we would have an even more epic moment with Norway.
Ik it would have been obvious with Netherlands but Televoting winners deserve their moment
I never realized that San Marino was in the Top 10 of the televoting 😮😮🤓
And people say juries are bad.
@@cokomoko7 maybe they feel bad for San Marino?
San Marino could win at Eurovision 2021 😂
Tasteless voting does that to you.
turkish diaspora
New system might provide a more exciting show, but it completely disregards who the televote believed in. In this case, no one remembered Italy getting 2nd or Russia getting 3rd (or acknowledging San Marino getting 10th in televote), and definitely not Norway being Europe's favourite of the night. What do we left with? North Macedonia flopped followed by 'Sweden 93 points' smh
So what? Why are making it as if televotong is the most important factor? It's not, it's a 50 50 formula and I don't care of San Marino was top 10 in televotong or whatever.
@@cokomoko7 we do
Capserino agreed
If public’s favourite one is also one of juries’ fav, then in the old system, it would still be exiting. So it’s hard to tell which one is better based on just a single year.
But I agree that entries received top televote should be easily known by the audience.
They also did North Macedonia dirty. Thanks to the stupid mistake in the voting, they didn’t get their jury winner moment and that’s something that won’t probably happen again to them in a long time.
Erez Tal: Moving on to the United Kingdom. And the public points to the United Kingdom are… 3 points.
Germany: Ha, ha, ha!
Bar Refeali: And we move on. We go to Germany. Germany, you received from the public votes… I’m sorry. 0 points.
Germany: WHAT?!
United Kingdom: Ha!
Germany: But at least we're not last, so HA right back at you!
@@mysticgirl916 UK: Hey! We got 3 points from the public, and you didn’t get any!
3 countries left: Italy gets their points, so exactly in this moment it was absolutely save, The Netherlands would have won
-> The Netherlands get more points than Italy
-> Norway NEVER get more than 400 points
So thanks for changing the system :)
in the new system it was clear that netherlands have won when they got their points. because then only 151 points were left to share between two countries so even if one of those got zero, 151 wasnt enough to catch up...
@@DominoLarry How many viewers watching at home would have been aware of that though..
@@aleksanderpagels288 well I was calculating along
@@DominoLarry calculating the results is ruining the moment for yourself
@@DominoLarry damn i replied 2 years later my bad
Thank you for producing this, well done. Furthermore I notice you've started with the corrected jury totals and positions, and ended up with the corrected combined totals and positions.
If the gap between jury’s vote and televote wasn’t that big, it would be much exiting in the 2016 system. However, the juries definitely have their unique taste lol
This was way more intense, you have no idea which country is next! Thanks for uploading this
I think the old system was better because you realize who the televotewinner is.
Agree.
Thank you for making this! :)
Best system ever with best song
Erez Tal: 0 points to Germany.
3 points to United Kingdom.
7 points to Czech Republic.
13 points to Belarus.
20 points to Malta.
24 points to Greece.
32 points to Cyprus.
35 points to Israel.
Bar Refeali: 38 points to France.
47 points to Albania.
48 points to Estonia.
51 points to Denmark.
53 points to Spain.
54 points to Serbia.
58 points to North Macedonia.
59 points to Slovenia.
Germany... I'm sorry XD
Germany: WHAT?!?!
United Kingdom: Ha!
The new system does bring excitement, but the public winner is lost in the blink of an eye. Televoters do want to see the ones they voted the most. This is why I still prefer the old 2016 type of announcement - each winner (jury, televote) gets known equally.
I think it's clear here that the new system is better. You could already tell that The Netherlands was going to win once Italy got their points.
@@icklokore9230 True, but that required math, and not everybody likes to do math. With the old system, you would not need math to see that Norway needed like 400 points to catch up, which they were never going to get.
@@icklokore9230 no you couldn't
@@capserino234 yes you could... If you add up all the televotes given to all countries except for the last country and subtract the answer from 2378 (that is the number of countries [41] multiplied by 58 [12 points + 10 points + 8 points + 7 points + ..... till 1 point] , you will find out the number of televotes that that country has actually gotten
@@jochemvanhees actually it was possible for them to get over 400 points as the maximum amount of points that one can get is 480 (this year)... However it is very unlikely to achieve the maximum amount.
@@axlsammutelmer5908 i mean theoretically yes but practically no. I doubt that it would ever happen that one country got more than 400 points from the televote.
Glad they decided to mix things up because the new system is more exciting.
EBU was lucky that this year the system they used this year was the only one that would make it exciting... the 2012+ system NL would have even won with higher margin. the 2016(in this video) Norway must have gotten 450+ points(which is almost impossible). So good for them :P
Almost impossible? Norway needed 458 points while only 400 points were available.
Love X Esmay 40*12=480... so it was possible :P
The fact that Israel was above Cyprus, Greece and Malta is unbelievable
Preferred this old system so much more! It made it so much more dramatic when a country like Sweden in 2018 only got 21 points
Israel beated Malta,Greece and Cyprus with the televote lol...Thank god we have juries
Honestly? With all due respect, I agree xDDD
Well, I'm biased, I've always loved the idea of juries
Because Israel was much better than them ;)
@@voloshanca If that's really it then I guess San Marino really was the 10th best entry of the night lol Israel should've placed third to last, just above Germany and The UK
Malta, Greece and Cyprus were all trash in my opinion
@@juanignaciotejero Are you Portuguese by any chance?
This would have been an exciting televoting sequence if they kept this presentation
Agree
OMG GET THIS GUY MORE SUBS
2016: 0 points to Czech Republic.
2017: With 0 points, it is Austria.
2019: Germany, you received from the public votes… I’m sorry. 0 points.
2018: Iceland 0 Ooints
Παναγιώτης Κοκκίνης That only happened in the first semifinal.
2021: (laughs suspiciously)
Will you do a version of the 2021 contest? (:
Great work! Please do a simulation for esc 2019 after your opinion
This system was better...
Absolutely
Of course!
How do you do the table ??Do a guide!
Great video👍! Do u know were i can get this years voting music?
Thanks :) Unfortunately... I didn't found them.
czcams.com/video/-P-bC2zCGYY/video.html
Please Junior Eurovision 2019 OLD SYSTEM of presentation the results
What software do you use?
It’s like a Mandela effect, that we think n Macedonia got the highest jury votes, but it was actually Sweden. Like wtf
How did you made this televoting?!?
PowerPoint 😎
Have you use a macro script or transitions?
@@escplay3156 AYyyyyy same ere
@@eurodalmatia316 use the morph transition, and a few animations for the going up and down at the top of the 2nd half and bottom of the first half
ha? what did you say? what's morph transition?
Points GO, not GOES. They are many! Only 1 point GOES. And a place too.
Sweden and north Macedonia could not go to the final for my top 26 🤷♀️
How you do this?
I don’t get it. Can someone please explain how the old voting system worked?
The only difference is the way that they announce the televoting results. In the old system presentation begins with country which gets the lowest number of points from televoting, no matter how much points it has from the juries. In the new system announcing begins with the country which is last after jury voting.
I loved Iceland 💙💭❤
What app did you use ?
PowerPoint 😎
The new system is better cause with the old one we would have know the winner before the last voting
I still prefer this way
Me too
100 pts was to low for Azerbaijan 200 would have been rightfull looking to the other highscoring televotes|
I’m sorry, Germany. 0 points.
Germany: WHAT?!
United Kingdom: Ha!
The points=error
Y'a des fautes, pour chypre c'est pas bon
Justice for the UK!
Wtf?????? San Marino in top 10.
WHAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
turkish diaspora + the memes
AZERBAIJAN
The Televote sucked this year a lot!
Completely disagree
And we move on. We go to Germany. Germany, you received from the public votes… I’m sorry. 0 points.
599 likes why am I,lucky like some videos
Greece robbed.
Jimmy ' no, stop it! They Got What they deserved.
ESC Moldova no,Greece is so rebbed!!!
Agreed
Never watch this biased shit nowadays since Wogan left. Way too political. Good songs get shit points from countries that have a grievance with them ......... it's no more a genuine song-contest than flying in the air. 'Suppose it's why they started telly-voting, so folk could actually judge a song on it's merit, and not from a political angle.