Sony A6300 vs Panasonic G7 - Whats The Best Budget 4K Camera?
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 08. 2024
- Here is our 4k camera comparison between two of the best budget UHD Cameras the Sony A6300 & the Panasonic G7.
More info on the Sony A6300:
bhpho.to/1SRyXBH
More info on the Panasonic G7:
bhpho.to/1YfUZiY
More info on the Zhongyi Lens Turbo II m4/3:
bhpho.to/1TDbhDA
More info on the Zhongyi Lens Turbo II Sony A:
bhpho.to/22e6dps
Follow Me on Twitter bit.ly/PKP8jD
Add us on google + bit.ly/SK83hi
Like us on our Facebook Page on. HJGIoy
I've been using the G7 and I have no regrets. The kit lens has surprised me. With that said I do have the 25mm F1.4., which is awesome. I've enjoyed photography again, I would recommend the G7 without reservations.
is there noticable evf lag?
+linus sak (LinusB2) , in 60fps mode it's barely perceptible.
+BrainDesmo barley noticeable? never heard perceptible
+linus sak (LinusB2)
per·cep·ti·blepərˈseptəb(ə)l/adjectiveadjective: perceptible(especially of a slight movement or change of state) able to be seen or noticed.
+BrainDesmo ah okey so like making a fast twist with the camera will make the lag noticeable?
I went with the g7. I love it so far! The a6300 would have had me sold but I wanted a fully articulating touch screen. Maybe The Gh5 will have amazing auto focus Like the canon 80d. Then I will get that.
+wyo russ iF THE A6300 had a fully articulating touch screen .... it would have destroyed everybody
agreed!
+wyo russ After shooting with Panasonic you'll find the Canon image incredibly soft. I did some Beta testing on the G-6, which was and still is one of the best cameras I've ever shot on, including high end cinema cameras costing 10x more. The G7 seems to have the same mojo as the g6, though I haven't got my hands on one yet ,Thanks Panasonic!!! still waiting!!!The new Sony rx10iii has an incredible feature set, I've never thought I would take a second glance at a camera with a built in lens, but that camera is crazy good. 1' Sensor, which is a bit smaller than m4/3rds, or equivalent to s16mm film cam, but with the 24-600 lens, you wont have any issue getting a shallow dof when needed. The real gem is it shoots 960fps in 1080p. Pretty incredible for a 1,400 camera.
Totally agree. I had GH4 but believing or not I prefer my G6. something technically is so right with that camera.
how are the photo capabilities
-Using G7 through my phone is incredible, you can autofocus, change ISO and filters, take pictures, etc. from your phone so I don't have to step all the way to the G7 in order to modify a setting.
I use the g7 for my channel and I have to say I love the camera! The vast amount of lens options is incredible, and a few days ago I completely soaked the camera in the rain while recording (in the video called "New Christmas Music??") and it's fine! I'm so glad that I bought it!
No mention of the serious overheating problem with the a6300. That's just irresponsible man. You should update your review.
ok I have used both camera. I own the g7. If your on a budget go with the g7 for sure, In terms of which is better they are pretty much the same its just about the features rather than quality.
Reason for the for g7:
* it has a fully articulating screen
* it does not overheat
* much better rolling shutter (not great but much better than the a6300)
* lenses are cheaper for micro four thirds systems
* with good lenses Its better for photography (In My Opinion)
* lighter and easier to carry around and use
* both cameras are good at low light up 6400 iso
Auto focus is not as bad as people say but it depends what you shoot and if you need it. (for me its pretty much ok)
Sony is NOT a budget camera....
Sony is a OVERHEAT camera for sure. stay away from SONY camera and PHONE, buy SONY TV and HIFI only.
thank you. shit is $1,000.
Broooooooooo😭😭😭😭😭😭 I legit get so upset when I see CZcamsrs come at us with the "best budget cameras" caption and I'm seeing Sony. Stop playing with meee fgs😭😭😭😭
Really helpful :) and its great to see you reach 200,000 subs :) you deserve more
nice to see you here too!😋
nice to see you here too!😋
i have a G7 and i'm very happy with it, really good camera for stills and video
Great comparison. You should have mentioned that the A6300 does 4K 30p in crop mode - this is a major drawback for the A6300. Even most cellphone cameras can do 4K 30p without cropping the FOV.
g7= $600 with kit lens
a6300= $998 no lens
might as well get the gh4 if u r gonna buy the a6300
lol That is very true. Im saving money for the g7
it depends on the camera u want i prefer a traditional feeling camera i dont like the way sony a6300 is set up but if that is u then go for it to me that was just as important as specs
Find the cheapest price for the camera online. Even if you think the site is unreliable. I went to bestbuy to get my camera and their price was $700. I got it down to $500 when they price match it.
Ryan Ross Body only is $500 for G7 right now.
a6300 is far better than the gh4 in practice. only problem is overheating for wich u can get a fast card and an external battery. Autofocus is supercool in a6300 and 120fps full hd. its bang for the buck.
Love all your videos....congrats 200K subs. You deserve a lot more for putting out great well thought out videos.
👍🏼 I've been looking at used versions of these 2 cameras, and your video really helps me decide, despite slight price differences used. Thanks for mentioning the rolling shutter jello effect, too. Thanks!!!
Good video man! A few things not mentioned that I think are worth noting is that the a6300 uses the whole sensor so there is no pixel binning. But most important is that it's taking a 6K Image and down-scaling it 4K. Funny when you zoomed in to 200% the a6300 looks way cleaner so you're going to get a much sharper image.
Also, the a6300 is weather sealed and the G7 is not. That can be a huge deal breaker, I was in New York shooting with my a6300 and it started to rain and wasn't a big deal. The G7 in fact would have to be stored away and kept safe. And last thing if you use a Speedbooster with the a6300 the rolling shutter is almost non existent, pretty amazing if you ask me.
Armando Ferreira What speed booster brand do you recommend for a Sony 6300?
Please reply.
Metabones
I have a Sony 6300 with carl ziess glass 24-70mm f.4 I like it a lot but , I missed a lot of the full frame look.
Is this adapter going to help me to recover that full frame look ?
Thanks a lot ,
Jorge.
+Armando Ferreira get a nx1 6.5k sensor 28mp 15fps the sony is a knockoff nx1 samsung camera and its a 265 file so it saves space
seedz11 Nah, I prefer Sony way more versatile. If you look at my CZcams channel I shoot with A7SII, A7RII and a6300 and all matches perfectly. I've also shot with FS5 and FS7 and having that type of options is awesome. Also Samsung is killing their camera lineup so investing in a dead ecosystem is not a good idea.
Sorry, but I think, that the picture of the G7 is MUCH sharper at ISO 6400 (second 5:42). The 'International Edition' on the bottom right corner is sharper.
wasnt fully focused. look at the star wars ship comparison... without a doubt the sony is WAY sharper
Don't try to convince yourself that the G7 is better. Is not. The G7 is not bad though.. you just pay less and you get less. Simple.
Keep in mind the G7 has a HDR mode and a variable Highlight/Shadow S-curve dial, so to say that the G7 is inferior regarding the handling of highlights isn't really true, IMO.
please tell us a bit more about the lens turbo adaptor on the a6300 !!! :)
Tengo la Sony a6300. Estuve comparando las dos cámaras una semana antes de comprarla. El autofocus en la g7 es algo flojo. En la Sony es increíblemente rápido y preciso. El 4k en la g7 no es malo pero la Sony graba en 6k y lo escala a 4k.
El tema del calentamiento que tanto mencionan en la Sony se arregló con la última actualización. Ahora dura el doblé de tiempo sin que se apague sola por sobre calentamiento. El Viewfinder en la Sony se puede usar en 120p y créanme que se ve mucho mejor que en la g7.
Mi consejo es que si buscan una cámara para viajes, ser Blogger o algo que no requiera algo tan Profesional la g7 es para ti.
Si por otro lado buscan crear contenido multimedia para producción, filmación en eventos grandes, cortometrajes o documentales con alta calidad y detalle vayan por la Sony. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I have the Sony a6300. I was comparing the two cameras a week before buying it. The autofocus on g7 is somewhat loose. On the Sony it is incredibly fast and precise. The 4k on the g7 is not bad but the Sony records at 6k and scales at 4k.
The issue of warming that both mentioned in the Sony was fixed with the latest update. Now it lasts twice as long as it does not go out alone due to overheating. The Viewfinder on the Sony can be used at 120p and believe me it looks much better than on the g7.
My advice is that if you are looking for a camera for travel, be a Blogger or something that does not require something so Professional the g7 is for you.
If on the other hand they seek to create multimedia content for production, filming in large events, short films or documentaries with high quality and detail go by the Sony.
Una pregunta. Soy solo yo? O en la G7 la imagen se ve muy digital a diferencia de la sony a6300?
@@DIACC0_oficial tengo una G7 y no puedo encontrarle la vuelta con el tema del color, comparando con canon por ejemplo, la canon se ve mucho mas "cinematografica", la G7 la siento con mucho menos contraste, como mas lavada. Mismo tengo una nikon 3200 y en cuanto a color me gusta mucho mas la nikon. Es una lastima porque el resto de las funciones y como camara en si me parece muy comoda la G7
All these people willing to pay almost double for not double the quality lol. Sony is great, better than g7 no doubt but not 600 US Dollars more
you can get one used for 750 bucks. It's the better deal imo, better low light, bigger sensor, 24 mp vs 16 mp, 120 fps vs only 60 fps, higher iso, great auto focus, recording in s-log2 and s-log3, weather sealed.
The difference in dynamic range is huge also huge.
Honestly i would get the g7 in a heartbeat but now i dont know anymore. I have sigma 18-35 and its actually cheaper for me to get the sony a6300 w mc-11 or pay $300CAD more for lumix g7 + speedbooster ultra.
And thats used price too!
if both of these cameras were the same price, which one should i pick? great video btw
dude! you lost weight! right on brother👍👍👍
What if it came down to price? I can get the G7 for about $350 less then the A6300. I'll mainly be using this camera for vlogs and as a webcam for live streaming.
2 awesome cameras for sure, i dont think you would be left wanting much if you chose either, for me the way to go is buy the G7 leaving more budget for good lenses and if i have a situation or a scene requiring better low light performance i would rent a sony a7 series for a day if needed to complete the shoot
Hi, i was looking for a camera to record video, i found panasonic vx870 or x920, but these are really different from each other.. I've also found fz1000 panasonic but it's really big and zoom isn't smooth with video. Finally i found also G7, which seems to be good, but there are video time limitation.. I record sometimes video on racetrack, and also i record live music in small club with external mic; not necessary 4k but at least 1080p @50/60, thanks
This is the video which I was searching about for 2 months! Thanks bro.
Thanks for the review! i just bought the G7 and after a week i couldnt be happier. Such a good value!
I'm really considering the a6300 but a fully articulating screen would have been really nice to have. The touch screen isn't really a big deal to be
Everyone is saying to just get the G7 for video, but that full frame look you get with lens turbo on the a6000/6300 has really got me interested
Great vid. Thx. If the best of both cameras would be incorporated into one, especially the controls of the G7, that would work for me. I work with the Sony Nex 7 and the Sony a6000. Both get the job done, but I hope Sony is watching, you make so many good points.
Are you serious, the Sony a6300 wins hands down. Your comparing $600 camera to a $1150 one. If you want to compare cameras, at least compare ones with the same sensor size.
+Jessica Jung wow i just checked it out, & price diff. is $550. lol not so helpful
yeah until it overheats. indoors. with AC on lol. a6300 could be the best, but it's completely unusable
So... the sony produces great 4k, but overheats and s-log3 is worthless because it outputs at 8bit, making grading difficult. HD is really disappointing, so you're reliant on downsampling from 4k... the problem is that 4k doesn't allow for slow-mo, so all the fps/time-lapse functionality goes out the window... and then there's the rolling shutter. Ergonomics have always been problematic and there's no touchscreen, which would solve a whole host of those issues... Sony have crammed a boat-load of tech into this camera but it appears that many of it's selling points are hamstrung in one way or another....
Guys. I have the G7. Just go with it, don't hesitate. Trust me!
no.
Guys, trust me. I'm from the internet.
lmfaoo
Is G7 is a full frame 4k, ??
@@hemanthnaik4613 No. It's Micro 4/3 (In terms of sensor size: Full frame > APS-C > Micro 4/3).
Thank you for a very clear and to the point video.
I have both cameras, it is the last day I can return the a6300. Watching this video for the 5th time..... lol.
Which camera did you keep? I currently have the G7 and I'm debating returning it for the a6300. I'm not impressed with it's limited frame rates for slow motion and I'm not sold on the stills
Hey man what'd you end up doing?
***** I just kept the G7 and purchased a prime 25mm / 1.7 lens for beautiful stills and low light. Are you debating between the two?
I also kept the G7 and do not regret in general. Well, I miss a wonderful low-light at higher ISO performance of the Sony. Also, the still image quality could be better with the kit 14-140 lens. Anyway, I mainly use it for 4k video and the quality of it is top-notch
The 4K is gorgeous for such a small camera
I've had my G7 since May 2016 and I love the camera to death. I use the G7 along with my GH4 and I find myself using the G7 more often than the GH4 when it comes to run and gun situations.
I've owned both cameras. The a6300 auto focus blows away the G7. If you're primary using the camera for stills the a6300 is the way to go. I had auto focus issues with the g7 capturing fast moving images.
Dont u mean vise versa? G7 would be better for still since the auto focus is so slow
This channel is so underrated, keep it up waj
Hi, how about overheating? This bugs me the most tho, was thinking about getting the a6300 but it seems to be plagued with overheating issues.
Nice review ...sony a 6300 is a very good camera but i have g7 and i love it .I shall use it for short films,and as someone told ,focus on art (shots ,lighthing ,grading,acting etc) and not so much hunting the technology issues.of course black magic and gh4 are better for filming but my personal opinion for all ,that have not the budget of buying a black magic cinema ,sony ,or gh4 ,grab a decent camera as g7 spend extra money if you can on good lens ,even good cheap lens (fujiyan for 15 euros) and just focus on technical features of art.For me the double and more money beetwen sony a6300 and g7, would lead me to prefer to buy an extra g7 or a second hand black magic pocket (to cover the better grading)than the sony 6300 and i repeet this is my personal opinion
At this moment the 6300 is $750. Would yall say that drop in price makes the 6300 the go to?
@ant billionz thats for your response. I ended up getting a GH5 a cpl weeks ago
@LSUisKING Exactly. The A6300 is 140% more expensive and with how close the g7 compares, its clearly the better budget option. PLus it offers some benefits over the s6300
Luca G. Depends on what lenses you want to get. 18-35 sigma and adapters for both, g7 is more expensive.
What about the new Panasonic GX80? I don't know if I should buy the G7 or GX80
depends, with the gx80 you are sacrificing the articulating screen and the microphone input, but you are gaining in body image stablization
Waj! Looking great my man! No weird feilings, but you are realy getting in shape?!
Nice video as always, relevant information, but in a compact form. Been having my eye on that G7 for a while, like the colors beter but the Sony does seem a bit sharper..
Keep it up, almost 200k! Deserve it!
The a6300 and Sony sensors in general have bad highlight rolloff and aggressive noise reduction. The G7 produces objectively higher quality video and is cheaper with a stabilized lens included. There is no contest.
Man..it really help me a lot if you have another review about the turbo lens especially with its autofocusing and sharpness on canon and nikon lenses
If your budget is around $500, then this is a no brainer. Because at a $500 budget you are now limited between the a6000 and the G7. Both are at the same pricepoint. Now your talking about non-4k (a6000) vs 4k capable. And I wouldnt even just say capable, it's high quality 4k. Only the pixel peepers would notice differences between the G7 and Sony a6300. Your average CZcams and Instagram follower wouldn't even notice or care about the subtle differences. But the price difference is not so subtle. Now you can ALWAYS say if pricepoint wasnt an issue then Sony beats out Panasonic's G7 all day, however the title of this video, which is very well put together, is BUDGET 4k. Sony is not budget, can also be argued, but what if someone's budget was $800? Everyone's version of "budget" is different as well. If someone's budget is $800, then they can get a G7+kitlens in addition to a Zoom or Prime lens. Or purchase just an a6300 with kit lens. The tracking, 120fps, as well as lower light capability would be probably huge determining factors for opting for the Sony.
Panasonic G7 has better colors than the Sony in my opinion.
Really the G7 is the best budget camera. If only there would be a firmware update that fixes the autofocus problem like there was with the GH5
Another great video Waj. You really do awesome work with all your reviews.
I just can't bring myself to use a camera with a 2x crop. I chose the a6300. 120fps ftw.
I went from Sony cameras to Panasonic cameras for video because of the lens selection and price. the 6300 is an awesome camera but not having an articulating touch screen makes it a tough choice for 'on the go' style shooting. There's also a deal on G7 right now where you get the G7, a 25mm fixed + 14-140mm lens for the price of the 6300. Good Sony lenses are just too pricey.
I got G7 and love it and never regretted.
PRICING ???? Sony is on double price !!!!!
+Tamás Gulyás Also keep in mind the price of native sony lenses is very high. Not so much with panasonic!
Used prices. No
With the popular 18-35 for both and the adapters needed, G7 cost more.
Im talking about used prices
Hey Waj, great video! I was wondering how the lens turbo adapter performs in terms of unwanted glare and lens flare. I see some glare and softness in the shots where you're talking directly to the camera; is this a side-effect of using the adapter? Thank you for your help!
Pros: of G7 If you shoot video by yourself, the articulating screen is a must.. Also when both the camera and the lenses are cheaper it helps a lot more.
Cons: Am not convinced about the G7s photo capability but for video its great. The auto focus is not great. You can get away with shooting with higher aperture(greater depth of field) and manually focusing.
For the money G7 is a much better choice.
This is a great video and review, thx! Do you have any thoughts on which ND filter(s) is good for the g7 and other micro 4 3 cams? thx!
Thanks for the review!
I already bought the G7 and pretty happy with it for recording and the price!
That extra adaptor you mentioned, is it needed?
Any recommendations on a lens as an upgrade?
Cheers!
I sold my a6000 and was about to buy the a6300 until I saw comparisons to the g7....so I bought the g7. If you shop around, you can buy two g7's to one a6300.
+Jorge Martinez You're only speaking as a bargain basement shopper, rather than understanding that people have specific shooting needs. Who cares that you can buy 2 of something for the price of 1 of something else. That's a silly argument. Cheap price doesn't and shouldn't be considered if a camera doesn't satisfy the consumer. I don't like the slow focusing on the G7. That automatically rules it out. And for a micro 4/3 camera it's strange that it's so much bigger than most APS-C cams.
+Wesley Jordan lol, I own my own videography and photography business and as far as video, I've been working with budget cameras since 2011.
Call me a bargain basement shopper, but at the end of the day my cheap g7 allows me to get more clients for their weddings and quinceañeras.
The g7 can do the same as the a6300 at a fraction of the cost. If you run your own business and you feel a 5dm3 or a7s or whatever full frame cameras fills your needs, then more power too you. just don't underestimate the power of the g7 and the operator!!!
+Jorge Martinez well said
+Jorge Martinez or G7 + Speedbooster + Good Lenses ... and you have much more better quality than a6300 at the same price ...
Jorge Martinez
So the G7 focuses just as fast and accurate as the 6300? I'm hearing differently. Because according to you, your G7 works exactly the same as the 6300 at a fraction of the cost. Hmm.
Nice video! But what about A6300 and A7S ii. When to choose each? And does it worth the extra money?
Sony Alpha A6300 get so hot and turn off after 20 minutes in 4K. That's why some people don't like it but that camera is a beast.
What he forgot to mention is the fact that the Sony A6300 has major overheating issues when being used for video work. He can't deny it as its all over the web and its a known fact. Do you know why he doesn't mention it? its because he has affiliate links in the description that will make him money if you buy through that, so he's going to keep that sort of thing away from this video.
***** Fair enough, but he should still mention the bad overheating issues that the camera suffers from.
+Gari Clark Where did you get these informations? It isn't true! I got the a6300 and I never had problems!
Loads of videos and reviews online and also a friend of mine had the same camera and had this problem. Its a common problem with the A6300 and maybe you got lucky with yours
+Gari Clark There were a lot of Problems with the a6000... it's possible that they transfered these informations to the a6300
Both the a6000 and the a6300 have the same issues. My friend had the a6300 and he had big problems with video work on his camera.
Thanks for the info on the turbo lense. This was very informative. Good work sir 👍
60fps is enough, who cares about filming in slowmotion everytime? if i need more fps i use premiere pro last features or twixtor.
the only bad fact of g7 is autofocus. when i use it on zhiyun crane in low light some times go crazy..
I don't like either camera so I'm getting the Panasonic FZ300 bridge camera. It has so much more to offer.
I have both of these. I love both of them. I do have a massive problem with the controls on the G7. The controls dials are labeled so poorly I have to use a magnifying glass to see if I'm 4k photo mode or continuous, etc.
Any huge difference in video quality between this two ?
I was about to pull the trigger on the a6300, but for $400 less, the G7 looks badass. The only thing I personally would be missing is slomo, but hell, I could buy a Go Pro for those purposes with the money I save!
About that rolling shutter jelo effect thingy, the sony a 6300 has a setting that could change that for your info
i luv B&H, my entire pc build was from there, except the mobo, keyboard & mouse
The A6300 is 1300 euros (Body Only ) for that money you can get a GH4 Body ! The G7 costs a lot let then the A6300
Thanks, great video.
Nice compare. before a6300 announce, I was want G7, cheap and have flip screen, but I like Super 35mm mode, so the end, I choose a6300, but two camera all good.
Awesome comparison Waj! Nice channel too :)
The Panasonic G7 doesn't overheat.
Slamdunk winner.
Sound Speed! I want to buy g7 on 2019, is that worth?
@@shota1680 Yes, but it lacks in-body stabilization, weather sealing/sturdier body, and the ability to record longer than 30 mins at a time - there's a time limitation on the G7). I would opt for the Panasonic Lumix G85 if you want these features (and can afford the extra couple hundred dollars cost when compared to the G7). If not, then the G7 is an excellent budget camera. Totally still worth it in 2019. I have a G85, btw.
@@DennisMeetsWorld Thx for ur advice! i really want to buy the same camera as yours, but i had not enough budget for buying the G85 , thats why i search a cheaper cameras but with a good quality, Thanks man...!!
@@shota1680 Anytime! The G7 is a BEAST of a camera!! Just think of the G85 as a G7 on steroids lol
@ant billionz ant billionz Just to be clear: You're talking about a $1,105 Sony camera from 2017 vs. a $497 Panasonic camera from 2015...not really a fair comparison and I'm pretry sure the focus was budget cameras but 👌
A6300 has lot of jello handheld. It's is fair to compare to g85/g80 similar price with IBIs and no jello or rolling shutter.
Removing jello in post is very difficult
I like my GH 7. Bought it new for $525 with the 14-40 kit lens.
Where! Its a good price!
Cardinal Camera on Amazon.com
Do you have a website? i couldn't find it
Thanks
Website for the amazon page
Yes, this is what I have been wondering!
G7 been around for a bit, has mic jack, similar to G4 for the most part but pretty cheap.
A6300 fairly cheap, almost double price a G7 at the moment but this may change as time goes on.
I have not watched the review yet, but let me PREDICT THE VERDICT!
----
A6300 will have better noise handling. A6300 DOES NOT CROP MODE for 4k!!! So 4k video SHOULD BE SUPERIOR to AN CROP 4k camera.
Hello MW Technology. Great review. The sharpness of the Sony A6300 is amazing...By your experience will the Fujifilm X-T20 be a good 4k camera alternative to these 2 (Sony and Panasonic)?.
I just can't decide because the 4K videos I saw on youtube using the Fuji X-T20 seem so bad, I don't know but it seems they lack sharpness and vivid colors...
Very well video info!!! Thank you for making a nice explanatory simple fun video!!! Good job!!
Great Review . Very helpful information . For the cost, it's kind of a no brainer so I bought both. 4K video, as well as photos, are Outstanding on both. Use the G7 for most everyday events when it gets darker switch over to the A-6300 for the low light benefits. Best of both worlds so, win win !
Damn those books. Definitely used them in school. Such nostalgia hahaha
Nice review. As you say both a great cameras for 4k video. As for best budget camera it would have to be the G7 purely based on costing alone. I managed to pick up the G7 with 14-42 kit lens for £257 when Panasonic run their cashback offer (around US $370). I'm sure the A6300 will be an amazing selling camera for Sony but I really hope that Sony bring out some quality reasonably priced lenses. At the moment their lens selection for E mount is either way to expensive or not very good when you compare what you can buy with the micro 4/3 system.
As a vacation camera, which one would be best...
Simple high quality still shots, and will probably record video no longer then like 10 mins each...
would you recommend this camera for everyday vlogging and videoing cars that are 90% of the time moving?
very good comparison video. please more of it :)
Can the Sony connect to a tv monitor while recording? I understand that the Lumix will go black screen on a monitor while recording.
Hey Waj! I'm on the verge of purchasing the G7 coupled with the Speed booster you feature on this video. I read in a few places that the Zhongyi Lens Turbo II m4/3 has some Chromatic aberration and blurring on the edges of the video. Your test footage proves that it is not the case, but I was wondering if there is any truth these claims at all?
Which one has better quality for stills, I just want a 4k camera that can do video and photos
***** Thank you, I just got a better lens with a high aperture.
Nathan Jay U r wrong..a6300 is far better in low light vs the g7
Black Privllege go for the a6300....it's way better than g7...bt g7 is also a good camera...but u just buy the a6300...it's the best bang for buck camera
lmao tyhis brain dead idiot said the g7 is better inlow light... ahahahahaha. the a6300 makes the gh4 look like a bitch in low light and in image quality it shits on any panasonic. dont lie ignorant child
and no its not slightly better for stills its leaps and bounds better. that baby 16mp camera cant keep up with 24mp
great review thanku!
Hmm, hard choice. I'm considering an iMax camera, what do you think?
I am having a huge issue with my A6300 recording having this hum sound. I have watched tons of videos that tell you how to adjust the camera to get rid of this hum but I am not sure what the issue might be. I have a ring light and 3 fovitec box lights for my recording set up. If you might know how to fix this, please let me know.
I think 4k is great on the g7, but it seems for some reason that the video only really looks impressive when you are shooting people. When I switch to shooting video of landscapes or city scenes, the visual flaws seem so much more apparent, and even the 4k resolution does not look impressive. I do both photo/video, and for instagram, the photo performance on the g7 is ok, but I am definitely not sold. Probably gonna look towards the Sony A7siii.
Could you do a comparison between the A6300 and GH4 for both stills and 4K video?
Is this camera good for vlogger with cinematic shot? I am looking for a camera with at least 50fps, flipped out screen, and microphone jack. Can I grade the color at 1080 60fps?
I'm trying to choose a good budget 4k camera that can do 4k video as well...the Sony is considerably more right now at $1000 vs the Panasonic at $600.
The A6300 has more detail because its a native 6k sensor vs 4k on the G7. The rolling shutter is the worst out of any camera on the market, that isn't always an issue though. In low light conditions I've found 6400 on the A6300 not very usable. The max is 4000 iso for me. I wouldn't go over 1600 on the G7 though 3200 isn't too bad. The A6300 wins at 3200 vs the G7's 3200. It retains more detail. The dynamic range is defiantly better on the A6300 in both the cine and log gamuts. Its got more shadow detail and preserves highlights better. The highlight roll off isn't great. The 1080 modes on the G7 are very superior to the A6300 though you don't get 120fps. Video Autofocus on the Sony is amazing though and kills the G7.
Well the IQ and size is easily on the A6300 side. No question that it gives better IQ but the question is, is it worth that much more money for the better IQ. That will depend on the needs of each person of course.
If the G7 was at least the same size, it would be a good choice for me as a smaller body to carry around but the bigger size on a smaller sensor is never a combination that works for me.
can you tell me which one I can use my Lavalier Microphone with if possible?
Would you recommend the G7 over the canon 70d as far as shooting videos go?
nice video, but why does your footage looks so dreamy looking?
2020, would anyone still suggest the G7?
The overheating problem of the 6300 it's on all the resolutions or only when filming in 4k?
whats the battery life on these cameras? Also these cameras that do 4k i have to assume to get the best video you need a good card. How expensive are the cards. I only came across this video by chance, not really looking at a 4K camera but for one that takes great pics and HD video with time lapse function, preferably under $1000. Any suggestions please?
The G7 is a M4/3 while the A6300 its a APS-C sensor... this just make it unsuited for comparison... period
Max 500$ vs 1000$+ period.
Can’t agree more. Different format different price range altogether.