Toddler YouTuber Ms Rachel Invites Dylan Mulvaney on Her Show?
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 06. 2024
- Mega-popular kids CZcamsr Ms. Rachel stirred the pot after she posted a video wishing happy Pride to her followers, which comes in the wake of her also inviting trans activist and influencer Dylan Mulvaney on her show for toddlers. Let’s talk about it.
Become a Patron: / amalaekpunobi
Join My Discord Server: / discord
Watch or Listen on Spotify: spoti.fi/3LNbCV1
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/48k9yNU
Follow Me on Social Media:
Instagram: / theamalaekpunobi
TikTok: / amalaekpunobi
X: / amalaekpunobi
Facebook: / theamalaekpunobi - Zábava
Its always the "kids channels" magnetizing creeps like HIM
Not always, by no means. But I believe I have seen enough to say that it *mostly* always consists of one side of the political spectrum. We get obvious stuff like the whole catholic church debacles, but especially recently even they seem politically more aligned with the whims of the EU and they lean heavy left. Just an observation I have personally have. I truly hope it is simply just my own limited experiences but I am getting very tired of it regardless. As if anyone needed another reason to be mad at liberals after what they have done to our greatest states and now country. I have only been a Democrat for about 12 years now but I have noticed they really do like to incorporate children into everything they do even 5-6 year olds, I witness this from media sure, but I see it at their DNC events live and in person also, it is so very disturbing. I feel torn on the matter.
They need to prepare the next generation to give them support and power
I thought Mr Rodgers was good what did he do he's a drake/epstine now
Dylan doesn't tend to be around kids, though. Most pedos can't get enough time spent with kids. I think Dylan is a different kind of sketchy.
@@robbietgmthe hell does the church have to do with this? stop projecting, and find a way to -dickride- *defend someone without pointing fingers at other, unrelated parties
Here’s a rule for you: just don’t let your kids on CZcams, or on any smart device. Have them read, or play, or do a jigsaw, or anything else.
Or sit down and play with your infant!
Two full time working adults and a house to maintain.
Not always realistic. At least Ms Rachel is educational. It's unfortunate I'll have to be more cautious going forward.
To be clear we play with our daughter as much as we can and because of that and us only allowing her to watch educational stuff she's not quite 2 and more advanced than any 3 year old we've met
Baby wearing! I wore my son while I did laundry, prepped food, vacuumed, mopped, grocery shopped etc.
I think it’s much more harmful to put devices in front of babies than it’s worth.
My child watches noggin and Paramount Plus. They have some excellent children's shows. He prefers playing outside and being active, but there are times when he does want to sit down and watch something. I monitor what he watches very closely. The only thing he watches on CZcams is the dodo channel with all the animals. He used to watch cartoons on there until I started seeing a lot of very inappropriate stuff on it. I put a stop to it, but he loves the baby animals, so I sit and watch it with him when we choose to watch something. There's nothing wrong with playing on a tablet or watching cartoons when it's done in moderation.
Do you have kids?
The fatal flaw is the stupid modern idea that “love” means acceptance and endorsement of every action without question, context, nuance, or condition. We’re lost.
Agreed, completely lost. I want to deface every 'love is love' sign I see. That's how they normalise MAPs. 💀
Agreed, these people are completely changing everything. 😔😔
It's done to mainstream trans. Parents see him being cute and come to the conclusion that he's harmless. Celebrating "Pride Month" for young children is ABSOLUTELY INAPPROPRIATE. There should be NO sexual content of any kind. PERIOD
This obviously includes heterosexual content as well. ABSOLUTELY NO SEXUAL CONTENT OF ANY KIND FOR KIDS!
@@thefairybug40 I ABSOLUTELY agree. No kissing!
That you think pride is just sex....you have sex on you're brain.....ew, you whÅre. But, yeah, sex and transsexuals is not pride and are not love. It identity politics and has no place in a child program or channel. But love is love and straight, lesbians, gays and bi humans have just as much rght to a full life as all other humans. Stop hating nerd 😂
@@adararelgnel2695😂
Agreed and that’s the problem with pride month it is not for kids it isn’t just rainbows and puppy dog tales . It’s sexualized and people r celebrating thier sex use preferences like if we had a heterosexual parade what do u think would be promoted? It is NOT ok either way
Mr Rogers wasn’t a child groomer
He spent more time with stuffed animals than kids. And he had a day job probably as an accountant. He also had house shoes like Asian countries so he probably was dating a librarian Asian chick.
@@bl8388What?
he preached tolerance though
@@gloriathomas3245 was he preaching TQLMNOP+ propaganda? No.
@@gloriathomas3245 He was a minister & his message was only boys can be dads & only girls can be moms which was 100% correct & spot on
One of the main reasons my family let our younger members watch Miss Rachel was because she wasn’t like that, she focused on educational entertainment for children.
This is so so disappointing, I had so much respect for miss Rachel and the content she was making.
There is no safe space for children online, it’s better to keep them off the internet completely.
Your last sentence is the ONLY thing I have ever thought on the topic!
Why on earth would we want any children or teenagers using this internet knowing it today steals data from you, and is predatory?
Infants should NOT be given any computer/internet access, period.
Why not play with your baby?
She had a non binary character for years. You shouldn't let your kids watch anything without watching it yourself.
@@stitchingbear4003 omg that is crazy, sounds like the Red flags have been there way before Dylan boy came on the scene!
Yeah, I stopped using her a couple of years ago because of pronouns
@@stitchingbear4003This, this vid is good cuz it’s informative but super unfortunate most ppl don’t know she’s BEEN bought into lgbt stuff (for toddlers!!!!) for years now
Mr. Rodgers sang a song called: Boys are Boys and Girls are Girls, right from the start. There’s also an interview with him where he talks about that song and says we have to be careful when we tell children they can be anything because they may begin to think that they can actually change from one gender into another. Very clear his view on this issue.
My daughter needs to watch mr. Rodgers
I went to look this up and you are right. 1980s Johnny Carson and Mr. Rogers.
I am still so surprised that PBS or whatever organization owns that particular episode *lets* it still be out there!
Crazy it wasn’t an issue back then. Maybe he knew it would be because look at PBS now.
@@alessandrakalini they do not have it anymore. It is now a cat from Mr Rodgers neighborhood and it's a cartoon.
My children love and watched Ms Rachel… but as soon as I saw the Dylan/ Pride month controversy… she’s since been blocked. What’s sad is that she considers herself to be Christian and doesn’t give any Christian content… But she’s ready to pander to the lgbtq community? too many red flags for me.
Agreed a Christian she is not.
MK Ultra for toddlers
I let my daughter watch M’s. Rachel but since I saw this morning she’s making LGBTQ propaganda she will be blocked. I’m tired of that bs
This!!
I'm farrr from Christianity, but people like this parading as Christianity is appalling and disgusting to me.
Ms. Rachel needs to stop ... Full Stop you do NOT expose YOUNG CHILDREN to such things!!!
To see the video the parent has to go find the video to put it on, as it’s on her webpage not the CZcams channel. I don’t think it was a smart move AT ALL on her part, but at least she knew to keep it off CZcams. & those type of parents showing their children that video are already showing them gender propaganda unfortunately.
@@Taylor_mamaof2lol that doesn’t matter. You think kids this day and age don’t know how to find a web page? Web pages can be bookmarked on tablets making them more accessible by not needing to type In anything.
@@Pinkoala4207 Ms Rachel is for children under 3..
Slippery slope
Why does Pride need a whole month…give them 1 day like everything else gets!
I just don’t understand why she would purposefully isolate half of her fan base. Seems like a really dumb career move
Id say a lot more than half. Trans and "allies" are a loud minority.
Because she's an activist.
Hollywood/mainstream media are ALL like that. Plus they're gearing for the great falling away.
she just said she doesn't care
Unfortunately a lot of famous ppl do it because they’ve already made more money than they’ll need in a lifetime, and have built such a huge following that even if they lose half their followers, they’ll still be making well over 6 figures a year. THATS why they never care, cuz they don’t need any more money 😏
I wasn’t so bothered by Jewels because they treated the show with respect and no politics. A child likely wouldn’t know the difference until they were quite a bit older. Whereas Dylan is disrespectful to women, overly sexual, and extremely political. And the implication that this needs to be put on an infant/child show is disturbing.
Exactly. I figured Jules was just a friend of Miss Rachel's so it would make sense she would feature her on the show since she had musical talent. There's no reason to go out of your way to seek out Dylan Mulvaney.
Agree 100 percent! We will no longer watch her in our home if she makes this stupid move!
YES, Jules Is Amazing, Never Heard Anything Crazy, but Now my Husband is Almost Wanting To Ban Ms Rachel Now. Lol We Only Watch Her When I'm Cooking Dinner, But She Helps Calm My Little. Once Dylan Is On, I'm A Goner. My Baby Will Cry For A Bit Then. Lol
Yes definitely your my new BFF
I’m sorry. That woman creeps me out as much as Dylan does. My skin crawls when she calls children “littles”.
Yep!
My skin crawls when anyone says the word littles … like call them little ones ffs 😂
From what I've noticed, when most media has some kind of pride month recognition, they tend to switch to LGBTQ+ topics and then go downhill in quality.
Real
And kids will listen to her strongly because they already love her❤
So basically y'all homophobes? Y'all talk like "These American Christians do this shits so Christianity is bad"
I tried showing my speech delayed son ms rachel, and he would scream at her every time, so i gave up. Turns out we're not missing much lol.
Good deal.
Try sign language.
I find her voice annoying as well so I would scream along with him. My daughter was speech delayed as well but as soon as she was around other kids and not just her baby brother--I couldn't shut her up.
Speech Delayed? Does your son have dyspraxia by any chance?.
Your son sounds like a smart boy
Ms.Rachel really fucked up with this shit. We are doomed as a society. "I'm not about fame or views" brings on Dylan mulvaney- I call 100% BULLSHIT!
She is going to lose subs and she understands that, so yes clearly she doesn't care.
@@nartali9683 WOOSH- Point entirely missed, an entire football fields length (at least) above your head. 🤦🏼♀️ And you kind of insulted the people of your own side by saying that comment in the process, which made your comment more amusing. 😬🤷🏼♀️😂
@@TheKatarinaGiselle sorry if i triggered you.
So fun fact, I work as cashier at a craft store. I have babies that react to me as well. Even in the same way they're automatically perk up and smile. They stop crying all these things, right? She does it, by her pitch of her voice. It's a very high pitch and they can understand it better. They can actually hear It better. So, with their ear canals developing. Still, they don't hear the softer or lower voices as well. They hear the more high-pitched voices. So the more high-pitched you are but also calm. The more the children and babies respond. I do this all the time when I'm helping out at the register. And if I have a kid screaming, crying, or freaking out for no reason or just want attention. I just pitched my voice a little bit higher than my normal customer service voice snd I go hi, how are you? such a cutie pie. Are you okay? And they immediately stop crying, so I have kids that recognize me by my voice alone. She's not special. She just knows how to pitch her voice that's all.
My granddaughter would straight out say, "That's a boy". She wouldn't call it a man.
Bro it is crazy ahah
😂 “it”
😂😂😂
So
Our little one loves Ms Rachel, she is really great at what she does. I just don’t get why this ideology would ever need to be shown to such young minds.
It just straight up shouldn't babies minds are a sponge
Which is why they do it, of course. The earlier you expose a forming mind to such things, the more normal they think it is. A baby girl who is shown a man living as a woman in what is supposed to be a wholesome and safe environment grows into a young woman who mindlessly accepts and champions a similar man in her spaces. She views it as a normal and safe thing, unlike her bigot mother who knows better. It is incredibly insidious.
Because Ms. Rachel has an agenda and you aren't looking at her big picture. Later on, it will be Ms. Rachael the baby LGBT+ and because you let your guard down, your children will be even more confused!
The Bible also shouldn’t be shown to young minds. Lots of graphic things in it, and convincing people that they’ll go to Hell is arguably indoctrination
@technoloverish as a Christian I agree my parents just brought me to church and we would just do arts and crafts
We don't do Baby Shark, Cocomelon, that creepy Blippi guy or Ms Rachel (among many others). I think having discernment as a parent is critical these days
They all fall under the category of MK Ultra for children.
Yeah Blippi is weird lol
Blippi comes off odd, the Asian? double he uses more often is about 60/40 homo/groomer ratio.
Meekah is tolerable so far, I try to avoid the NASA and dinosaur crap though.
Kids younger than 10 should never be left alone with devices that have acess to platforms where they can find whatever content. It´s more dangerous than ever before nowadays. Even kids TV shows are infused with political messages and weird stuff. The amount of questionable people targeting kids online is out of control.
I have put out a Ponder question: would you drop your young child off in the middle of Time Square to be exposed to anything and converse with anyone?... 🙅♀️🙅♂️ then why would you give them a device that has access to internet and social medias?
Terrible terrible business decision.. if I had a multi million dollar children’s Empire, I would do everything possible not to alienate half my audience. The best entertainers stay out of politics because people from both sides buy tickets. // we don’t actually need new children’s content. Just rerun Mr. Rogers and the early years of Sesame Street. It’s not dated because good values don’t change.
Childrens Televison are you kidding me? Motivate the children to do something? 😀 And even worse to learn something? Man it could happen it will practice their little brains, who wants such? I mean as result you will have a motivated child with a high creativity. *Who has the time for such a child? Who is who and how is how, who can stand this all the time?*
@@Gernot66Dr Seuss has entered the chat.. 🤪
@@Gernot66 wtf are you talking about?
@@johnphilly2479 CTV, sesame street
@@johnphilly2479 CTV network, sesame street. Wouldn't it be horrible if children would really learn something from it?
See he pointed on sesame street and in my opinion it was the best ever, especially if i remember my own childhood (i'm from Switzerland, "Sesamstrasse" appeared around 1972 in the german tv, i guess).
Yes i know it still exists but he did also said "early" and i guess i know what he likes to point on.
To work with the children and to include them in the show even in front of a tv set.
And of course the content of what was aired.
But whatever you do and hower you do it, it all needs the presence of the family, or at least a part of.
It won't work if the children just watch it, they need a motivation, but once there is no stopping them.
Instead to force the curiosity in our children we often hemper it because we have at this exact moment no time for them, caugh.
Even if they don't outrightly say anything about gender, it's not innocuous. It's not just about Dylan Mulvaney. Ms. Rachel also has a nonbinary woman on her show. It's about normalizing the idea of gender identity. Of all the people she could have on her show, she CHOOSES to have specific people on her show and it's for a very specific purpose.
So very true. It’s obvious that most of her regular cast are very much part of the alphabet group. Not surprised she’s now come out with this
But isn not everyone technically a sinner?
@@technoloverishWho cares about sin...I don't want my 2 year old dealing with sexuality. She literally just realized her brother is a boy...
@@Donkeykong80 I mean there's that one lady with the boyish haircut and clothes, but as a far as I know, she just plays music. Still, never hurts to be careful.
@@littleluxia that person has a clip on the show where she introduces a teddy bear as “their name is patches”. That was enough for me tbh
Why are babies looking at Tiktok? Shouldn't their little faces light up like that when their parents talk to them? Babies shouldn't be looking at screens like that.
My 15 month old granddaughter enjoys Ms Rachel. We watched it together to encourage her to talk. Her mom would turn it on while she prepared dinner. It used to be safe. BUT, her messaging about PRIDE month implied that anyone who had a problem with her support of PRIDE was not standing with love. That was an unnecessarily passive aggressive stance. There's no room in that statement for a difference of opinion. It was very intolerant and geared to shut down discussion. BUT, that pales in comparison to inviting Dylan M onto the show. In addition to being in woman face, he presents women as being vapid, promiscuous, mentally unwell and silly. Even if he was a biological woman he wouldn't be a role model for young girls. What was she thinking with that invitation? She is no longer a safe choice for us. And I'm offended enough by the whole thing to not turn her on ever.
Agree 100 percent and there are PLENTY of other things for our babies to watch!
And PRIDE in its traditional meaning is not discriminaying non straight people, is it not true that you are hypicritical in love if you stress so much against Pride? If I always see Shitty Christians should I based Christianity from that like you?
Why do these people want to mess with our kids so much. Kind of scary.
It’s scary how obsessed these people are and want to get so close to children
So it can be accepted at early ages by kids & it’s normalized for kids.
@@nappyfries also to groom kids more easily
It’s easy target. They can’t mess up with all the adults because some of us actually think. But unfortunately kids are easy target and they can influence them from an young age 😥😥
@@AdrianeMandrake-dk3pwbut it’s ok to condition your children to mistreat and bully gay people kids? At the very least lgbt are trying to teach kids not to bully others…
Mr. Rodgers would be devastated to learn what is happening in our society today with the rise of ipad kids and transkids. He would most likely feel like he failed. He was very concerned about media and the effects of TV on children and wanted to create a channel that children can watch that didn't contain a lot of violence or political stuff. He just wanted kids to be kids and to go outside and play.
Fred Rogers preached tolerance though...
He wanted kids to know that they are loved and that they could express their feelings in constructive ways.
@@gloriathomas3245 I think the tolerance he taught was to be friendly with each other despite any differences. Not tolerate bad actions.
@@gloriathomas3245 Mr. Rogers also preached "I love you just the way you are". That kids don't need to "change" themselves at all.
Mr. Rogers supported gay and black people. Get your facts straight. I was his neighbor for 20 years. He treated everyone equally and you should be ashamed of yourself for lying in his name.
As a child care provider of over 20 years from ages ranging from 3 months all the way up to 8 years, anybody can really be Ms Rachel If you have a love of teaching children. I remember being pregnant over a year ago and one of my sisters telling me about Miss Rachel. I honestly had no clue who she was talking about. She proceeded to tell me about her and How amazing she was and how I should have my baby watch her. I then thought to myself is she for real? 🤔 I let her speak and when she was done, I looked at her dead in the face and said I am Ms Rachel! I don't need her to do anything for me and my child.😎💁♀️ And it turns out I was right! I don't need someone like her to confuse my toddler or any child that I raise.
As a parent of 3 littles, I can tell you that this was very inappropriate to bring into a show for little children.
Sexuality is a personal choice, but the ages that this show is geared towards is HIGHLY underage for this topic. Even though it’s just a simple pride support message, it’s actually a gateway to a conversation that should not take place for years down the road. It’s opened up a “can of worms”- and I can guarantee that in the near future, she will go further & further into this topic. It’s VERY inappropriate at this age.
I cannot believe we are even having to discuss why talking about sex and sexual preferences at any age below teen is even remotely ok. I do not support the whole pride bondage and exposing culture . It's changed from when i was younger. I don't like what they show now
I'm just happy I grew up in the 00s, when stuff like this was considered adult-only material. And it should be. Even as adult there's a lot of things about the rainbow cult that I find repulsive. You know, the stuff that USED to be only within the privacy of one's bedroom.
@@littleluxia Thing is, that normal heterosexual couples have been shown in media for years and nowadays people call it disgusting and propaganda, to have a gay couple on tv, on par with the heterosexual couple. Both couples are just... couples?? Yet one is accepted to be shown 'outside the bedroom', while the other is seen as some sexualized fetish that should only exist where nobody can see it.. That's just wrong...
@@Trunkslover14 It could have been this way but people took it too far, that is why people are angry now.
@@littleluxiasame here 90”s & early mid 2000”s myself I am glad my nieces re” not toddlers anymore. With this garbage ♻️ now a days.
I don't like it either I am glad my nieces younger cousins no longer toddlers!
Her voice drives me nuts.
It's a kink not a bug.
Thank you … I felt a need for a insulin shot
Do you mean her fake voice or her actual voice? Cause if it's her actual voice then that's just messed up.
Agreed . That's what gets the kids attention
I found her repulsive before I knew this about her. My daughter used to love to show ms. rachel to my 10 month old granddaughter. When she heard about the mulvaney thing she said NO MORE!
My non verbal autistic daughter learned how to talk by watching cocomelon. She was doing 3 sessions of speech therapy a week and learned nothing. Cocomelon caught her attention with its bright colors and songs. She even learned how to distinguish different emotions and facial expressions because of the way cocomelon portrayed their characters faces and how theyd sing songs about different emotions. Im getting very tired of people saying cocomelon is trash or not helpful. Not all kids are the same and not all kids learn the same way.
I actually really like cocomelon. 😊
You go girl 😘
Honestly I think the reason people have started to view it as trash is due to the types of situations with parents that'd just leave it on 24/7 for their toddler, without monitoring or interacting with their kids.
Kids who genuinely learn from something like cocomelon should have access to that.
I just think the discernment of unhealthy exposure and healthy exposure has been getting mixed up when people discuss things like cocomelon.
From what I've seen it partly stems from the elsagate situations. Many people are critical of children's content on CZcams because of the insidious child content farms on CZcams that take advantage of the kids who are left alone on tech all day. And unfortunately cocomelon gets lumped in with that
@@Its_Asteriainteresting. I read shows like Cocomelon were considered overstimulating and create lots of dopamine hits which messes with the kids reward system.
We buy cocomelon magazines, they are full of educational content
To me there is a HUGE difference between supporting gay parents, or homosexuality in general, and supporting trans ideology and someone who advocates for kids getting gender change surgeries.
Why would you invite Dylan Mulvaney on a KIDS show?
That is what is STRANGE.
I didn't watch the video but why is Inviting a trans just about telling kids to change?
@@Catastrophic_31 sorry I dont understand you question. I see videos of american kindergarten teachers telling the kids they are not a boy or a girl they have to " choose".
That is terribly confusing for a kid, and its a clearly pushed ideology where you tell kids that they are a soul trapped in a wrong body that is close to a religious cult.
If you invite a trans person to talk to kids for pride month I assume is to give a speach about gender being something you choose and pushing that on little kids.
The difference between Mr. Rogers and Ms. Rachel, is that Mr. Rogers was a pastor's son and a believer since his youth; he stood firm on the scriptures and what it teaches.
You should watch the Mr. Rogers documentary called Won’t You Be My Neighbor.
Mr. Rogers supported gay and black people. Get your facts straight. I was his neighbor for 20 years. He treated everyone equally and you should be ashamed of yourself for lying in his name.
Who are you replying to?
What? I always thought he was gay? Or was that a rumor? I don't know anything about him outside his show, but when I was little I remember people saying he was gay and I believed that until this day.
@@lisamendis5886 His wife and two children would probably disagree.
Never put babies in front of a screen. I have a degree in Early Childhood Education and you can do your own research into why if this is news to you. I’m also a stay at home mom with two little ones, I know how stressful parenting can get. But PLEASE don’t let your babies watch TV. There are so many other great and inexpensive options out there!
I wonder how the children stuck on laptops, ipads or tv's will become as adults. For sure, they will lack patience, they will constantly need to be excited about things, they will never have a real thought, etc. Pretty sad and scary. I NEVER allowed my kid to be stuck on TV or any device as a toddler, early childhood either. I knew how bad it is. Even now, I still have rules for tv and the laptop. No social media either. Not now and not until she reaches 18.
and then we wonder why so many kids are adhd/autistic these days...
I don't even have any cable. Can't remember the last time my TV was on and I have a 5 year old. He has a tablet also. He completely forgets about it. We have enough room for him to be outside. Bring back the outdoors!!
@@ravenrose3730 No need to be so strict, babies she is for sure right.
In mine as well as in the case for my stepson televison soon lost its attraction.
A comparison i had a friend from a religious family to him it wasn't allowed to watch as child, i could watch whenever i liked to. But when i was about 16 and had my own tv set, he was the one who always liked to watch tv. Since 20 years i haven't one and do not stream series but perhaps a movie a week.
Similar my stepson, unfortunately he grew up as a child of a single mother until 4, yes that means an oversaturation with tv, but he soon "recovered" from that, however he's even less interested in gaming as i, electronic media is far to common to him because of me that it would really fascinate him. "It's ok, but it's not the real thing", and that is in return very ok.
But limits are for sure needed, he for sure had no own web connectivity before 16, "you can use my machine whenever you like but not without my supervision".
*And this i guess what leaks most that the parents take their time to supervise the children*
Make clear limits and always keep your own promises or promise nothing (you know children can be very exact and in an hour means in an hour and not one second longer). They willl keep the limits and also keep their word if you keep it.
And every drawing i made for my daughter later on was ten times better as anything else in this world 😀
"paint me a dog"
"paint me a cat"
"paint me ..."
It needs patience and time and guess i worked on the contruction side got home at 7 pm, often cooked for the family and still had time for the children and now compare this to the nine-to-fiver with his easy peasy job who doesn't finds the time for his children because of all that "i me me mine".
---
"...even those tears, i me mine, i me mine, i me mine..."
(yes i do have a radio in my ear)
Question for you, because I am genuinely curious and want to learn and no one seems to have answers for me. We have a 10 month old and a 5 year old. We have screen time rules in place for our 5 year old to make sure that it has its proper place. I've noticed that when my daughter is watching educational shows like Daniel tiger, Mr. Rodgers, reading rainbow, etc our 10 month old son tends to want to watch and follow what's happening with his eyes. We do not place him in front of a screen. But I'm curious about what to do when they are in the same room as an older child who is watching TV. I try to shield his little eyes so he doesn't watch. Most of the time I play with him or I try to take him into another room, but it's not always possible.
Someone on Twitter pointed out that her statement for pride assumes that anyone who objects to pride messaging is not coming from a place of love. Lefties and liberals-in-a-bubble have this tendency and it really grates.
The babies response is so disturbing. My kid watches more tv than she should but never did she respond like that, these kids are getting too much screen time
Fred Rogers was, and is, one of the most gentle, benevolent and kind hearted men who has ever lived.
Yes! And he made it CLEAR! Boys are boys from the beginning! Girls are girls right from the start!
Holy Trinity, mr rodgers, bob Ross and Steve ❤
@@angelinahale1356Ok, I know Mr. Roger’s and Bob Ross… who is Steve?
❤❤❤
@@BeanMacdui bro Steve from blues clues In my opinion the only non creepy child show host
Can you say, “Goodbye “?
You, Rachel, just couldn’t resist!
Yep, you’re spot on, it’s over for Rachel in my family!
Well that's actually nothing problematic. That's very common. Stop trying to make everything problematic
The baby's reaction to her voice alone is so sad. Children normally have this reaction to the voice of the person who they depend on namely their parents mostly their mothers so the fact that they are reacting to her voice in this way means thet they have spent a lot of time with this woman through a screen.
Something cultish and Mk ultra ish about it.
Babies should not be using tablets, period. Ridiculous.
The ones educated in developmental stuff that embrace gender woowoo are even more insidious to me. Then again I don't think they're all that qualified to begin with, judging by the so-called qualified candidates being spit out by the universities.
Gender woowoo and your sexualising mindsets are different that's why
I don’t have kids but I have zero intentions of exposing my future children to any modern media until they’re old enough to not be easily brainwashed. Sticking to the old school Sesame Street, Barney, the big comfy couch, and the like.
Find pre elmo sesame street with Linda and Barkley.
this is precisely what I did with my toddler. I dont bother with new shit
Bro Dora is nice too
@@stop0p yeah bro. Dora is cool
The big comfy couch is were its at !!!❤❤
Love that show
Content that is described as "CRACK for babies" is not what I want to show my baby to start with, so yeah...
I wouldn't let my child watch it because she had a non-binary guitar player on there a while back. My toddler does not need to be told about all of that. He's four.
And it's such a shame because her show has so many good things on it.
Your toddler wasn’t being told anything at all about Jules. She sung children’s songs and that is it.
@toreemoody1788
Exactly. Now, the lesbian lady is cool. I liked the dinosaur song she did and brushing the teeth one. Just cause someone looks gay doesn't mean they're harmful to children. I don't really judge anyone appearance. I only judge what they do and say. But Ms. Rachael entirely is no go to me. It's makes my child not learn. Jack Hartman is better plus she learns with him. She watch him more anyway.
Prove that you just hate THE PEOPLE.
I have not shown my children ms. Rachel so this is another reason why she will not be shown in the house.
That’s literally my thought seeing this!
Same here!
I found a good alternative that's Christian if you're interested! I also know some Spanish/Bilingual ones!
@@Tattleta1ewhat are the different ones
Lmao! I promise you she does not care.
"Welcome to the gayborhood?!" Nah... Mr. Rodgers was a Marine. God bless his soul.
Contrary to internet lore, Mr. Rogers never actually served in the United States Armed Forces. Although the iconic TV personality did receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2002, he did not officially serve in the Marines, the Navy, or any other branch of the army.
Lots of gay military, what’s your point? Gay people exist, god doesn’t
I'm sure there were gay Marines and still are lol
@@BisexualBeautyAaand your point is? Right....none.
@MrLynch-ei4dc what is ops point was is the point why does being gay make a contrast to the army if there gay marines then there is no contrast to being gay and being a marine make it make since cause this video don't make a lot of since
I have mo idea who Ms Rachel is until jow. As a speech therapist this is dystopia and sad. We use to train parents and expect them to do what Ms Rachel does for babies. To bond with them to encourage communication. Now parents are outsourcing this to a youtube lady.... what the hell is wrong with people. If you can't be bothered to bond with your child and teach them how to say mama and dads. Maybe you should have a chia pet instead of a baby.
Thank you!!! I've said the same thing. Those babies should be reacting/responding to moms voice that way, not a stranger online. Why is it so hard for 'parents' to actually BE parents?
I'm so glad my son was raised normally, he loved when I read to him, he would always pick out what book he wanted me to read to him every night before bed. It seems like people, especially women, want all their 'me' time after having children, well, that's not how it works. Believe me you'll have all the 'me' time you will ever want once they grow up and move out.
The reason why I won't allow my child to watch Ms. Rachel anymore, even if I'm controlling which episodes are watched because I won't support her financially. If there are ads on the videos, she is making money off my children and I WON'T have that if she is supporting Pride Month or Dylan Mulvaney.
Sorry but getting a baby attention isnt hard ..and doing a little voice like that aint talent lol 😂 too many sheeeeeep these days they follow anything.
I find the voice annoying and patronizing, would never subject my kids to that
They’re trained to be sheep from the moment they leave the womb. These babies with screens in front of them rather than stimulating toys like blocks or something freaks me out a lot.
@@rusinoe8364Exactly! I managed to make it through about 15 seconds of one of her videos before the voice pissed me off too much. Also I’m English and don’t want my baby listing to an American accents all the time
@@tyler.walkerExactly. It angers me when kids leave their kids in front of a screen as a babysitter.
The way she cried at that graduation speech 🙄. She knows we never had an issue with Jules, she knows the issue is Dylan, and she knows why. She’s not stupid.
True, I never had issue with Jules, I seen her as a Tom-boy type girl. Mulvaney is disgusting. We are done with her. My granddaughter could not speak words for 2 1/2 years after she saw Rachel she learned to sign and soon after speak clear enough to understand wants and needs. So disappointing she couldn't keep it for children only.
Yeah I agree. Jules is chill. Mulvaney makes a mockery of women and girls. No class. I wouldn’t even show my kid a biological woman that acted like that.
@@Grandmaw-knows-b3st I felt the same about Jules … that was where my suspicions about Ms Rachel started… however the show never said anything about her or her lifestyle therefore I didn’t have any concerns
I knew Ms Rachel was a progressive so at some point this was going to happen. I know at some point my child was going to be exposed to this ideology, but I want to be the person that explains to them what this ideology is, why you should respect people in general, but also that it’s not a lifestyle that anyone should choose. Dylan Mulvaney is a moron running around in “woman face” making a mockery of womanhood. It’s nothing but a costume and an act.
I dunno it was singing about squashing bumbles bees that got me side eyeing her🤣
Ok but WHY IS THERE CONTENT FOR BABIES IN THE FIRST PLACE. BABIES SHOULD NOT BE LOOKING AT SCREENS FOR ANY REASON. A child should not interact with screens at all until they're 3?? Let alone when they're literal babies??????? Also it's crazy and absurd to me that the parents instead of learning the baby-talk cadence form her (which is very much something babies need in their lives), they just put on a stranger's videos for their own kids. Absolutely wild times we live in. Freaking talk to your own children for the love of anything good and healthy in this world!
Say that before there was a specific video against queer people
The gross depravity we see in a lot of entertainment all started with a “benign” or seemingly harmless statement… nothing surprising here.
And still they refuse to admit that they are after children
This just shows what sick pos blatant liars they truly are
Nah. That is no longer true, have you forgotten the song "we are coming for your children" and the fact that they chant that in many pride march for a few years now?
@@elenabob4953 yea but they do deny it they say they chant that cause of what we think and they're mocking us. They're no better than chomos at this point
Who is "they"?
That "hi hello" bit plays off a pair bonding development that a child makes with their mother of whom she is not. Idk how you can see that and not be disturbed.
This! I was thinking this!
I am not disgusted by anything people drag in just to try to make everything dramatically problematic
Me and my son used to watch Sesame Street all the time and then one day as we’re watching they’re doing a musical number and there’s a man that looks like he’s in a tuxedo the camera pans out and it’s a full freaking dress like a ball gown dress I was irate, It was immediately turned off. There was no warning whatsoever, it is up to me whether or not I want my son exposed to that at such a young age it is not up to the damn networks!! it’s really a sad time these days when we can’t trust our kids to watch Sesame Street without being exposed to this garbage!
As a teacher people think that infants don’t have an understanding . That couldn’t be further from the truth.. infants brains are so programmable at early age. This is why they can learn to speak to read , to walk and I could go on so what ever you feed them at an early age will become their truths
So everything is just an agenda?
Here voice is like nails on a blackboard.
She's like those early childhood teachers that constantly refer to themselves in the third person. Ugh!
No it's not
Nah I heard much much worse
@@tailsprowerfan2729same, her voice is nowhere near like that.
My almost 5-yr-old watched Ms. Rachel when he was 1 due to some speech delay and concerns.. I stopped letting him watch due to Ms. Rachel bringing her transman sister onto the show and her presence was very creepy.
I found some other videos that is what I believe helped with my son. I found apraxia of speech videos and other videos that are excellent, my son was delayed and later diagnosed ASD. czcams.com/video/mjg6jWwi9MI/video.html
Jules isn't even her sister...it's just some musician she found on Craigslist.
Lol you just want to validate your random feelings to be just against certain people. Pathetic exposure
@story_monster Wow I didn't know that
I find it disturbing seeing all those people showing infants CZcams videos.
So many babies/toddlers suffering from virtual autism today, because of the ever growing time spent watching screens instead of interacting with their parents... 😢
We must stay vigilant about the content labled ‘child friendly’ our children are exposed to. It's important Not to rely on TV, tablets, & similar devices to raise & education our children.
It’s very very SAD to see those babies react to her. That is how their PARENTS should be talking to them. It’s babies reacting to someone actually talking to them. Why are their parents not doing that?
uggh you don't know that they don't talk like that to their babies you saw a 10 second video of their lives.
I dont think you have kids...lol
@@ChloeS90 You're right, but it's not that cut and dry. Either way, these parents are clearly letting their babies watch too much television if the babies even react like that.
It’s sad that these babies are watching TV and craving these simple interactions that should be provided in person by their caregivers.
As a result of Miss Rachel’s invitation to Dylan Mulvaney, we will no longer allow our granddaughter to watch Miss Rachel when she is in our home.
I agree with you - there are definitely 2 problems...Ms. Rachel - and the parents who allow their babies to be raised by a tablet. YES...I let my kids watch a movie when I need a break...but more often than not, we don't turn the TV on in a day.
We could really use Mr. Rogers right now. I loved his show, as did pretty much everyone. Obviously he was very important since he was on air for a million years.
Sadly a Mr. Roger’s just isn’t possible in this society. American culture doesn’t provide that space. Mr. Rogers was a marine who was concerned for the nature of media and the direction it was going. So he made Mr. Rogers neighborhood to help teach and promote better life lessons.
He was a Christian that desired to make good content. Nowadays things are a tragic mess for children exposed to media.
@@Polomance862 Mr. Rogers was never a Marine. If you want to know who he was, watch the excellent documentary about him called Won’t You Be My Neighbor.
Mr. Rogers was my neighbor for twenty years he had nothing against gay people and he was not a marine stop lying
Imagine if parents just talked to their babies and played with them instead of using screens….
Little kids do not need to be exposed to this woke nonsense at such a young age.
You calling it woke nonsense already shows that age doesn't matter to your ideology
Thank you for this information. I will never allow my baby to watch this show again.
Aren’t all people sinners though?
@@technoloverish your point?
@@technoloverish The answer is yes, but most people don’t try to normalize it and make it look like it is fine because it happens more less you see people promoting it, shoveling it through your throat and accepting it.
@@estrelladelnorte_prare all people belevers though? Stop pushing your religious agenda
@@Catastrophic_31 No, don’t you know that? Christianophobia though? Keep scrolling if you don’t like it.
There's a popular video game that employs this psych tactic. The good guy says "would you kindly" and then you do what he wants. He's actually the badguy of course.
My daughter definitely didn’t have that reaction but definitely loved Mrs Racheal. Thankfully she doesn’t watch anymore.
Lesbian family here: our daughter is 6yo and we don't let her watch anything on CZcams , have access to a nomad digital screen (tablet, phone).We are getting a tv this year after 10 years without and are getting a signage tv (opposite of smart tv).....Only show she watches are Little house in the prairies and bluey.
Just mentioning pride was fine. Dylan Mulvaney is a deal breaker. Hard no.
Kids shouldn’t even be introduced to “pride” it’s unnecessary
Nah, she shouldn't have mentioned Pride. Her audience is babies.
Well there's a lot of baggage attached to Pride. What is it?…sex and sexuality.
We’ve seen some of the craziness, especially at the DC parade: “'Adding little kids helps normalize Pride'”
This phrase explains ALOT!
I thought so at first too. But after thinking about it I wondered why she even mentioned it at all. Young children don’t need to know about it. They may have two mums or two dads or whatever the family dynamic is and I’m sure they’re quite happy. Why wish kids a happy pride month if not to get them questioning it? There’s time enough for that.
If babies are old enough to understand "mommy and daddy" and a heterosexual family dynamic, then they're also old enough to understand "two moms or two dads".
LGBT isn't a problem, but it's HOW they present LGBT to children, that matters..
Some people call it "sexual", to just depict "two mommies" saying they're dating, in a kids book, while that's the exact same as saying a man and a woman is dating, in a kids book.
It's weird how other hetero normal people make LGBT out to be this sexual thing, when it's often just normal dating, like any other straight couple.
Wow. This is infuriating. My child will definitely not be watching. How disgusting
When Mr. Roger's said that you were his special friend, it wasn't a bad thing.
When Dylan calls you his special friend, you better run or learn to deal with the mental trauma from what's gonna happen.
You just want to force trans to be predatots. You people just want to say things that if it happens you are glad you will have more contents and comments about it
Ms Rachel's message was very passive aggressive. She tried to shame parents who would choose not to have their children watch her show. She also reached out to Dylan and that was not needed. Looks like The Wiggles will be the show for now.
Next she'll be inviting Jeffrey or cake pop guy talking about his marshmallow wand.
Cake pop guy?
@@cameronwest7042 It's this guy who identifies themselves as trans and recently they went to Disneyland/world and openly recorded themselves talking about getting their genital area removed to have female genitalia...mind you Disneyland/world is flooded with children. They're having this discussion around children...
So I had to look it up and omfg my mind had this man locked away behind a bunker until I heard his voice again I haaaaaaaaaaaaate his voice 🤣
@@cameronwest7042 Yes, that guy...
@@cameronwest7042Lilly tino
‘We’re here we’re queer and we’re coming for your children’
Are you? Y'all sound like you desperately want queers to actually do something bad to kids do you will have more contents and comments. Shame on you
The point is whether Dylan verbally proclaims what he believes in on the show or not, that's not the issue. The problem is having him on the show automatically translates to APPROVING him and his life. It's NOT about "tolerance" or "reaching out". What is her mission in having HIM on her show? Everyone of those kids eventually will know who he is and what he stands for. This just says to me that he has her stamp of approval and that's that's a real disappointing red flag.
I agree what's the point? But why do you, people sexualise what Dylan is and stands for straight up as inappropriate. Like you want to force it to be sexual so you can attack them. If a trans says that they are trans and talk about our differences, it's just sexual at once?
The comments literally talk about Jules being non binary as the most inappropriate thing which was not even mentioned in the video and even if it's mentioned, where is justice for sny basic identification? Why wouldn't y'all bd concerned with bigots first than collecting Random American events to generalize everything against a whole group of people's public presence?
@@Catastrophic_31 It has NOTHING to do with sexualizing ANYONE! It's about what Mulvaney STANDS for and his sick woke ideologies. People who wants to be trans is fine no one is ever going to change that and it's 100 percent fine. We have to be concerned with the MESSAGE and IMPLICATIONS of him being on the show because that automatically puts a stamp of approval on him and THAT's my main concern. And please don't hold me responsible for OTHER comments. The second part of your comment does not relate to my comment at al.
We watch Mr. Rogers in our home along with reading rainbow and some 90s animated shows. Never new stuff. And this is why.
There are countless cartoons and shows from the early 2000s and before that just feel so much better for children, At least in Canada there are great shows that are easy to still find, like Bear In The Big Blue House, Dragon Tales, etc..
"The way they talk, this and that" Will still be a problem if it's the other way around
Having DM on your show = jumping the shark
My toddler was watching Ms Rachel very briefly. The minute I saw the non-binary character I didn’t stop because they didn’t seem to overtly push it. Now I’m glad my kid never got into it. Anyways it’s a good lesson not to sit your kid infront of the tv. I’m lucky my child enjoy being outside more than being indoors.
I just thought she was a lesbian
Giving babies screens is child abuse.
Media is getting super creepy. Reminds me of "The Boys From Brazil".
Mr. Roger's is rumored to have a full body tattoo. He never brought his personal life on screen. He was devoted solely on educating while entertaining kids. He has never been slammed or defamed. A true ♥.
Also rumored to be a bad a$$ navy seal with a lot of kills 😂 according to the movie none true
Your key word here is Rumor! Mr Roger’s would swim everyday and there was no full body tattoo to be seen.
And this and that is that's mom and dad. And this is a non binary, a trans. Everything except the first one is just straight up visually sexualised to y'all. Have some sense to avoid hypocricy. Stop forcing your agenda about judging people based on looks and basic introduction to identities
Most mothers aren't gonna care that she did that and still support her. Sad
I have a daughter who is 3 years old. She loves Ms Rachel. I would be fine with her little pride message. But if she brings Dylan to the chat , Then my daughter leaves the chat. Very sad
I have an almost 3 yr old and I may have put Ms Rachel on once or twice when she was younger, but on our 75" screen I felt her giant face and high sing song voice super annoying, so I never played her again. I didn't realize all this stuff was in there.
😂😂
I never liked that kind of stuff for kids. Its only good for literal babies, who shouldn't be in front of a screen in the first place. by the time they're ready to really learn language baby voice will only hold them back.
I'm a KIDS content creator and a mother of 4 and this really saddens me!
Everytime I hear about it. 😢
One of the things I want as parent is to know the intentions of those who are creating the kids content. I think that's the least we deserve!
That way there are no surprises later
I did my best to tell the parents what I stand for which is:
God, The nuclear family, boys can only be boys and girls can only be girls!
So I'm glad she did what she did and said what she said.
Now all of us as parents can make informed decisions
Thanks so much for this video!!!!
God bless you all❤❤❤
Just subscribed for my toddler. I’m glad there are people like you out there.
I just subscribed for my twin toddlers.
@Katie-ry4lj thank you!!!! So much!!!We have a low Stimulation Toddler channel as well! @childsheritagetoddler
@melissamiddleton2135 thank you so very much!!! If age appropriate we have a low Stimulation Toddler channel as well @childsheritagetoddler
So you are basically taking advantage of something that is inappropriate to generalize people you dislike as a whole? God, people with agenda calling other people's lives agenda is soo funny
_Everybody's Fancy_
Written and performed by Mr. Rogers
Some are fancy on the outside.
Some are fancy on the inside.
Everybody's fancy.
Everybody's fine.
Your body's fancy and so is mine.
Boys are boys from the beginning.
Girls are girls right from the start.
Everybody's fancy.
Everybody's fine.
Your body's fancy and so is mine.
*Only girls can be the mommies.*
*Only boys can be the daddies.*
Everybody's fancy.
Everybody's fine.
Your body's fancy and so is mine.
I think you're a special person
And I like your ins and outsides.
Everybody's fancy.
Everybody's fine.
Your body's fancy and so is mine.
It's Bud Light time for Miss Rachel.
Well there goes a bunch of her subs!
1:33 I'd cry to if I heard her voice😂
Bruh what?
Also, that child was crying before she heard Miss Rachel
She knows exactly what she is doing. She did the Gaza Stuff before and now this. She get more and more victim clout by jumping in socio political topics.
Why are u bringing Gaza and dead babies into this? Anyone should be against that..
And who politicise people's lives? People like you
I’m not understanding how showing your child educational entertainment is lazy parenting but showing them this random woman is acceptable.
It’s literally the same thing.
That's a good way to lose your business 😐
i was fine with it until she mentioned Dylan Mulvaney. Kids are doomed😢
She needs to be arrested for grooming.
Ms Rachel has a trans person that plays guitar on her show . That should have been a red flag.
It was not a trans. And you show that you want full discrimination and not something against inappropriate actions alone