I ABSOLUTELY KNEW THAT THE DIRT TEST WAS GONNA FAIL MISERABLY. It did great on the performance tests, but that dirt test, ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE. ANYWAYS, HORRIBLE TOILET.
Probably fine but people have had them explode in their house and embed porcelain in the wall. I would highly advise against it. czcams.com/video/KUSqg58if7Q/video.html
The 1st Gen PL toilet is still straight up garbage and as you said, it would really need to help to take the brush due to the poor bowl rinse it has. Still this did really whell
No toilet fails 5 feet and that's a fact. An American Standard Allbrook can take 5 feet and that's a urinal so if a toilet fails that, there is something seriously wrong with it and it isn't functioning as intended.
Flush: Apalling Performance: great from the era Rinse: Ghastly Overall review: I personally do not see a place where this thing would be good, If im honest. truck stops would have bowl rinse trouble, Resturaunts would have flushmate issues (Trust me from experience), and its just bad. Rating 1/10: 2
Awesome performance! It flushes kinda like it’s using 3.5 gpf even though it’s a pressure assist toilet and that’s due to a lack of bowl rinse
Yeah, these are interesting to me.
Amazing
How so?
Flush rating is a B
Performance rating is an A
I prefer the new ones to these
I never saw gold handle like that on a pressure toilet before so rare I never see this but I saw a toilet like that a few years ago
I twisted up a regular handle because I didn't have a pressure assist handle
Needs a handheld bidet hose for the bowl rinse. Never mind the terlit brush... 😉
Yeah, that would actually work pretty well I bet.
This toilet makes me hate pressure assist toilets even more now
These are some of the worst
I ABSOLUTELY KNEW THAT THE DIRT TEST WAS GONNA FAIL MISERABLY. It did great on the performance tests, but that dirt test, ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE. ANYWAYS, HORRIBLE TOILET.
Agreed. Not clogging is all Kohler cares about these days and when they try to make the flushes better, the performance suffers.
Seems like this toilet does good with solids but the bowl rinse in the problem
Yeah
I honestly prefer the 2nd iteration of theses as they tend to have a better bowl rinse from what I've seen
I would send them both to the dump where they belong
Worst Kohler toilet ever
It's definitely one of them
The 1st Gen PL toilet is still straight up garbage and as you said, it would really need to help to take the brush due to the poor bowl rinse it has.
Agreed
Honestly how reliable and safe are pressure assisted toilets for home use?
Probably fine but people have had them explode in their house and embed porcelain in the wall. I would highly advise against it. czcams.com/video/KUSqg58if7Q/video.html
Oh no it’s a pressure Heffy
Yep
Pretty bad at clearing the dirt but the performance is amazing!
I wonder how it would do against ketchup
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations I think you have tested that before, no?
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations that is an interesting idea
@@LukeGray-fs1sl Not an older one
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations Oh, right
What if this toilet use 1 gallon?
It would be worthless
Yeez that flush is a jet cannon
These are really powerful
Like a plane toilet
No rinse and loud
The 1st Gen PL toilet is still straight up garbage and as you said, it would really need to help to take the brush due to the poor bowl rinse it has. Still this did really whell
Agreed
I bet your 2015 glacier bay did worse than this on the bowl rinse
Yep
That’s the wrong tank but it still looks ok
Yeah
This is very surprising for a toilet that could not handle normal use in my house. And I am not talking bowl rinse either..
Probably because cloth doesn't stick or break apart
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations Valid points indeed
Failed FIVE WHOLE FEET on stf
No toilet fails 5 feet and that's a fact. An American Standard Allbrook can take 5 feet and that's a urinal so if a toilet fails that, there is something seriously wrong with it and it isn't functioning as intended.
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
Except my crane toilet, that thing barely passes on 3 feet, even clogs on 3 feet sometimes
Why does it flush so long for being a 1.6
Because it has no bowl rinse which makes it take longer for all the water to drain out.
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations ohhhhh ok
Other than the bowl rinse, it didn't do too bad. I'd give it a B-
I agree solely on performance
Performance is good, bowl rinse is atrocious
Basically all they have going for them is a siphon jet
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations yeah
I like this thing!
I like the sound
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations You should do this funny thing where you put a flushmate in a kilgore alpha that would be so cool
@@RMG_9000 It really would be cool!
You should do that on a tank that doesn’t have pressure
It would only ripple instead of flush
Thats the stupidest thing in toilet history
Flush: Apalling
Performance: great from the era
Rinse: Ghastly
Overall review: I personally do not see a place where this thing would be good, If im honest. truck stops would have bowl rinse trouble, Resturaunts would have flushmate issues (Trust me from experience), and its just bad.
Rating 1/10: 2
Agreed
Huh strange better that porcelamex
I respect your opinion but disagree
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations a qestion is there a toilet worse than porcelamex
I've sure seen it but not much
4:10 as usual 🙄🙄
Typical Pressure Lite
The second generation is a lot better but this one isn’t as bad as people make it out to be.
I respect your opinion
The bowl rinse of course... XDDDDDD
Besides it did well for the other tests, this toilet is still utter garbage.
Agreed
Of course the bowl rinse was atrocious.
Yep
It surely does its job, but it's still boring and kinda crappy, like every PA toilet.
The bowl rinse is pathetic too, like every PA toilet.
I'd question whether it does its job or not
you should dissect it
I gave it to BTR