Why Swords?
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 08. 2018
- Why were they so popular as status symbols and tools of war or personal defense? What made people in many (not all) places and time periods in history see a sword as more valuable or desirable than an axe, polearm, etc?
I don't think there is a definitive answer but I felt like elaborating on my subjective thoughts about this topic.
If you want to know where to get the swords and other historical reproductions in this video:
Lockwood Sl-1009 (Oakeshott Type XVIIIb longsword)
ww4.aitsafe.com/go.htm?go=kult...
Test on riveted mail - • Longsword, Gladius, Da...
Introduction to estocs - • An Introduction to Est...
Roman gladius by Raven Armoury
[no longer available]
Test on studded leather fantasy armor - • Trying Sword Thrusts V...
The Town Guard side sword by Arms & Armory
kultofathena.com/product.asp?i...
First impression - • My first impression of...
The Oslo Viking sword by Darksword Armory
www.darksword-armory.com/medie...
Ewart Park bronze sword by Neil Burridge
www.bronze-age-craft.com/swor...
/ bronze-age-swords-6449...
12th century spear by A&A
ww4.aitsafe.com/go.htm?go=kult...
Bec de Corbyn by A&A
ww4.aitsafe.com/go.htm?go=kult...
Chinese pudao by Hanwei
ww4.aitsafe.com/go.htm?go=kult...
General opinion - • My Opinion of Hanwei (...
Test - • Chinese pudao and East...
Follow me on Twitch where I regularly stream: / skallagrim_yt
To support the channel:
/ skallagrim
www.patronblades.com/skallagrim
For one-time donations: www.paypal.me/SkallagrimYT
Get in contact or see a list of my video uploads:
/ skallagrimyt
/ _skallagrim_
Follow me on Twitch: / skallagrim_yt
My favorite online store for buying swords (worldwide shipping):
ww4.aitsafe.com/go.htm?go=kult...
Where to get HEMA gear and practice swords:
www.woodenswords.com/?Click=1799
Channel-related shirts and other merch:
teespring.com/stores/skallagrim
skallagrim.spreadshirt.com/
Things I recommend on Amazon:
www.amazon.com/shop/skallagri...
My side channel (for rambles, vlogs, opinions, gaming, etc):
/ @skallhalla
Best-selling knives on Gearbest:
www.gearbest.com/promotion-be...
15% off on GearBest Outdoors & Sports products with coupon code "out15off": www.gearbest.com/lifestyle-c_...
#Swords #Status #History - Zábava
Skall: "Swords are awesome because we're fascinated by metal."
Me: *looks at playlist* ..."Checks out."
hahaha
Truth
Solid Comment.
Periodic Videos: Sodium
ooooooow yeeeaaaaaaahhhhh
I think part of the appeal of swords is that they were among the first dedicated weapons. Before swords most weapons doubled as farming or hunting tools.
Yeah, like clubs.
@@Burn_Angel no, you don't hunt with a club. Most animals that aren't too small/fast to hit with a club have skeletal structures such that blunt force trauma does very little damage to their vital organs.
@@Soulslayer612 Uh, you don't hunt with swords either. I said clubs because clubs were used by Homo Habilis as weapons to fight and steal from scavengers, because spears weren't invented yet/weren't mainstream. Clubs were the first dedicated weapon, like swords in a way.
glitter Well, men didn't invent rocks either, they just found them laying around, and gave them shape. And if giving them shape is actually inventing something new (which it is), then clubs are indeed the creation of our ancestors, as they were also shaped to fit the hand more conveniently while having the thicker side of the branch put on the side they hit with.
@@Soulslayer612 you do hunt with clubs. Frog clubbing as an example, rats.
"The way they glisten in the sunlight"
I'm pretty sure you're right about that. A lot of movie and video game trailers that feature swords will have a part where the hero is holding said sword and it shines from the sun/moon light. It's honestly an equally good marketing gimmick as it speaks to that same part of our brain.
I doubt it's just "ooh shiny thing", but as you said it it's probably more to do with the fact that it adds an almost "magical" mythological feel to the weapon.
An elegant weapon from a more civilised age. - Obi Wan Kenobi (Edit)
"civilized"
+Junjun Did said character get wounded by a spear? Because if so, that'd explain his state of being butthurt!
from* civilized* Obi Wan*
I remember a disney movie that the protagonist despises guns as they are savage weapon and processed to "pwn" with a spear.
Decapitating people *is* uncivilized... ;-)
I'm more of a mace kinda guy, doesn't get blunt, hard to get the angle of impact wrong, works against armoured opponents. Also it's basically a pommel on a stick
People like you like to pound things I see (͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Why TF is your name Zero Blade then? lol.
"Pommel on a stick."
^^^ This needs to be a thing!
Mace
Really useless in grapples. Cant cut your food with it in a disregarding manner. Short reach basically a chode worse at pericing armor then a warpick. Worse at denting armor then a warhammer. Basically average at everything and better at nothing. "Oh hey the slow guy doesnt have a weapon?" Give him a stick with a weight on it.
Doesn't get blunt? It's already a blunt weapon
Everyone asks "why swords?" But no one asks "how is swords?"
CLANG
Hey man. You cut your sandwich how you want and I'll keep doing it the cool way.
Reminded me of the first ninja turtles movie when casey uses one of Leo's swords to cut vegetables in the kitchen. Refraines from using the word katana here as this version of Leo doesnt use actual katanas
Eric Mahurin ya dont cut it . ya just eat it whole.
Spears were first used for hunting, knives were first tools, hammers for constructing, axes for working and gathering wood, bows for hunting.
Swords though?
Swords have only one use; to kill other people. I think we subconsciously, viscerally realise that and the implications it carries. It's the noble weapon because of the weight of responsibility the user now has.
Swords are also harder to learn than spears, axes, or polearms. I hesitate to say bows here, though because combat archery was quite a feat to master. To use a sword effectively you needed formal training which usually wasn't available to the lower class.
One practical thing about swords is that they can be easily worn on the hip, so they be taken around anywhere. They're like a handgun, whereas a spear is like a rifle.
Are swords easier to learn than something like a pollaxe? It has a hammer, an axe or beak, a top spike, and a butt-spike. Those are four different means of attacking.
id argue that spears have thier own learning curve in low density combat, but as a formation, yea pokey pokey ur ded, let the horse run into it...
otherwise, fully agree
I always saw Spears as easy to learn to the point of being effective. But perhaps hard to master if you want more out of it than formation combat. At least in my own experience.
Polearms are...I mean they look complicated but it's really just a spear or axe with more options. You need to know what each spike or piece is good for but applying them is basically the same as for a spear, axe, or hammer. Some polearms can hook so that would be a slightly more nuanced technique to learn but I still don't think it's harder to learn than a sword.
I've had chances to train with each of these weapons too so I'm speaking from experience, though my experience with polearms is more limited. However in that limited experience I found myself able to use them effectively.
No, swords are just replica dicks that dudes can compare more openly.
I enjoy your balanced and humble presentation. As a history nerd, I dig it.
Swords are awesome. Why? Because _swords!_
All hail to Shad!
But what about DRAGONS?!
Роман Гогешвили but what about machiculations?
Exactly
Who needs a whole sword, when you have a weapon of mass destruction on one end. The pommel.
Skall: Why Swords?
Comments: Because Swords.
I think the fact that swords are dangerous all over gives them a mystique. A spear has a very small dangerous bit, but a sharp sword repels enemies at any point. If you run your hand along the length of a sword very close to the edge, you can feel the danger it emits. Yes, that's a psychological phenomena, but to ancient people, the psychological was externalized. To them the fear that repels you from a sharp sword is a property of the sword itself, not their mind. It's as though the sword emits a forcefield of power and danger.
Doubt
-dangerous stuff has always been appealing to humans. Agree.
(Edited because your username made it look like I was disagreeing 😂)
Works on modern people too
And by extension of that externalization of fear, the sword took up cultural meaning. They became symbols of authority, of aggression, and in more spiritual cultures the sword was seen to have its own spirit.
@@vytas5584 the first time me and a few friends handled a sword, the mere act of looking at the business end evoked a very visceral feeling of fear and intimidation. And this was a fantasy style wall hanger (absurdly decorated/designed) which, even back in my teenage years, I had no respect for until it was pointing at me. We weren't being reckless or doing anything stupid btw like play fighting, just handling it.
The fact that many people back in those times would have known of or seen someone killed with a sword also plays into the psychological meaning of the sword. Guns are similar nowadays, a lot of people would be uncomfortable owning one even if it wasn't ever loaded. Those same people would probably have no real issues owning a sword because they don't know it as something that kills in reality.
I like swords for many reasons.
1. They are cool and AWESOME.
2. They are practical in a normal (little armor or confined space) melee scenario, probably the best next to a halberd.
3. The are often a symbol of power.
4. Great for decorating, they are fun to look at.
5. Come in *many* different shapes and sizes, and have different characteristics per culture. And almost every civilization utilized swords or something like them in some way.
Swords are beautiful and have a whole culture and etiquette around them but i'd still probaly choose a spear because of the reach and relative straightforwardness (hah) of using it.
Grandmaster Kush
That's why I included the halberd alongside it. It has the reach of a spear while being able to chop, slash, and smash as well, plus it has the deadly tip for thrusting that spears are known for.
The point is that it isn't easy to carry a spear around your city for self defence. I mean, you can do it, but it's pretty difficult.
True that
They are too unwieldy. Always carry a dagger. Less spacious, concealable and it's a suprise if you don't faff around with your Excalibur replica...
I think it's also about how sword were very versatile and difficult to use. A sword is handy in pretty much any combat. It's light and balanced, making it great for large scale combat. It's rigid with a long blade, great for defending yourself in a duel. with the right techniques it makes an adequate anti armor weapon too. If you didn't know what the day would bring, you took a sword. Its light, easy to carry and store, and at least adequate in almost every situation.
And I think it's downside also increased it's mystique. It needs training to be effective. A lot of training. Because it's light and balanced, it's difficult to have proper edge alignment, and just swinging it isn't going to do much damage. That shit takes time to learn. Time lower class people didn't have. They had to work. Nobles did too, but not as much or as hard. They had time to train.
So, because they're handy, nobles liked having them around. And because they're difficult to learn to use, only nobles had time for them.
Essentially it's the best universal weapon for a variety of combat scenarios while still being rarely manageable in social situations(think modern day concealed carry and how there is a desire for a light gun that is also concealable enough to not be socially awkward)
Difficult to use a sword against an armed opponent. Easy against unarmed opponents! Perfect oppression tool for nobles to put down peasant revolts.
You missed one important point. Swords can be worn, for the most part.
Also 6:18 brought something to mind. Is a macuahuitl a sword or something else?
"Swords can be worn, *for the most part* ."
imho, its a sword, just the blade was brittle, (but repair and replaceable)
in contrast a leiomono is a war saw, sharkteeth ripping gaping wounds in flesh, you not stitching that back together with any ease
although they do lack a certian aspect, vital to "end him rightly"
In the battlefield, you can wear a sword around while holding a polearm, bow, or shield. While back at home you don't want a decorative weapon getting in the way of your daily activities.
I'd call the Macuahitl a sharp bladed club. But then again, that's what a sword is when you get down to the basics.... Hmmm 🤔 I'm gonna just use the term Proto-Sword. Don't forget that many islander peoples actually made a weapon under the same concept, but used shark teeth instead of stone or Obsidian.
@@bubinater2 except you dont walk around with a great sword, theyre used in battle. Nobody in their right mind would be like "ah yes, the greatsword, a perfect self defence weapon"
This video is pure gold, Skal. It really shows all your love for swords, history and blades in general.
Loved it from the first second to the last, 10/10.
Sword is an all around weapon that you could carry everywhere (bare max of it). I mean it's basically a long/extended knife & knife is the all around tool for human since ancient time. Many cultures used knife in rituals, so it might be continuing to the sword as something ritualistic, noble, & knightly/kingly.
Love your channel dude thank you so much for teaching me so much
The amount of info you relay to us in these videos is always appreciated.
I absolutely love this channel. I find these videos so interesting and cool, and they never fail to keep my attention! Thanks for the good quality; highly interesting videos Skall!
Im prone to think that the first human that forged a blade thought "oh look,it stab! what if i make it longer so it can stab more?" :v
Jokes aside, i am an evolutionary biology, and trying to think about swords in the same way i can think about claws or teeth, i believe the answer could be a mixture of efficiency and chance. Swords probably were just longer knife, than they became some sort of social symbol the same ways the feather of a bird of paradise were once just a flying tool, then became a way to get a partner :P
We're all about that display of capacity to achieve.
I'm mainly here for the amazing beard. The swords are a nice bonus.
This is such a great ramble, I love this video so much
I'm thinking you just might live in Canada, and love your insight. I'm 67 yrs. & very new to swords, and have come to have an interest in them by the most obscure route imaginable. I do contact/firesword as a hobby. A vast difference in handling you might say as it's more trick oriented. Yet learning about swords, handling, uses, styles etc. has been an eye opener for me indeed. My desire is to incorporate more actual sword moves into my "act" for the sake of appearance. So far, it would seem from my light research that the longsword may handle the closest to firesword. All info is great. I've been learning much lately, and what I have seen of your vids, thank you for your knowledge & insight! Much appreciated!
Because you can end people rightly with them...
But only if there's a pommel, you couldn't do it with a gladio.
You remove the blade and throw the handle.
couldn't you just buy a bumch of pommels and skip the swords,just pommel them to death
@@FrarmerFrank No. To end someone RIGHTLY you have to remove the pommel from a sword.
Because people like you can make dumb comments about pommels.
I love swords not because of the tool itself but those who chose to use it. Miyamoto Musashi, William Wallace, King Arthur and Sir Lancelot, Afro samurai or Samurai Jack! It is as if those who use a sword are independent and strong! A noble weapon built for an
honorable warrior! The battling of Sword On Sword in a duel is very Formal and Conventional but I yet can grow into an extrordianary confrontation!
No satisfying answer???
This is exactly the kind of stuff im here for
Educated rambles and explanations about swords etc
Thanks and have a good day ^^
Subbed to you since around 10000. Crazy how far you've come.
Swords seem more civilized than other weapons (in terms of symbolism).
1) They are typically made mainly of metal. This makes them seem both more 'enduring' (which makes for a good symbol of power) and seem more civilized in that they have less in common materially with prehistoric weapons. And the shine helps too.
2) They are designed primarily for battle with other human beings. Though in some sense you could just consider them very long knives, they are still clearly distinct from the agricultural, hunting, or other common tools that any peasant would use for more mundane everyday tasks. If you pick up a sword, it's because you're doing something extraordinary (at least from the common person's perspective). (And I know this could be said of any weapon designed for war, but arguably a sword reminds one less of a knife used for everyday purposes than, say, a battle-axe reminds one of a woodchopping axe.)
2) At least in the case of the iconic straight sword, they seem designed to defend, parry, etc. - they look like something that was designed to defend almost as much as to attack, and in turn to generate more sophisticated exchanges between opponents. That makes them again seem more civilized because they are the sort of thing that one can wield while having noble intentions and of which one can have a refined mastery that is tested in friendly duels rather than just barbarous slaughter.
Consider all these factors together, and it's no accident that they became the symbol of chivalry and central to fantasy iconography.
To sword or not to sword, now that is the question
onim26 Sword
fair enough
to halfsword thats the answer!
I always enjoy your insight on such matters Skall, even if it does turn into a rambling session at times. I really don't mind at all. You definitely hit on some rather good points. Your channel is the reason I have Kult of Athena up on my fav tabs and drool at all the weapons that I wish I had, perhaps when I get my own place I will slowly start a collection which hopefully will include some that I make, because I want to get into blacksmithing/bladesmithing and jump down that rabbit hole too. :) lol
Not a regular viewer, but I’ve become quite fond of Skal and his videos. Keep going, man, you’re awesome.
swords id say are valued because of... a few things, one is the fact that it is indeed a dedicated killing tool against people. and that i would say gives it a very powerful aura of importance as a symbol for war
second is that its a weapon you carry with you ALL the time, thus making it more intimate
its status as a sidearm also fdoes mean that it became a lot more decorated
and as a weapon is the best suited, best jack of all trades weapon, for its size class.
its also the most nimble of the short weapons, this has allowed the use of the sword above all others to become an art form
a mace for example and to a lesser extent an axe or hammer doesnt require a huge amount of practice to be quite lethal due to the mass, but a sword almost entirely relys on good edge alignment and bodymechanics to do any damage.
this required dedication meant that the sword became important for those who studied it,
in china they say it takes 1000 days to learn to use the spear, 100 for the staff but 10,000 for the jian, the cut and thrust sword of the gentleman
BECAUSE SWORDS ARE AWESOME AND YOU KNOW THAT THEY'RE AWESOME AND YOU WANNA LET YOUR FRIENDS KNOW BY..Oh, wrong channel
Unpopular Spirits man I feel so bad because I wrote almost the same comment and got way more likes
@@user-js8jh6qq4l why would you feel bad for having a bigger number on your screen?
Because likes are the evaluation of how creative and relevant your comment is. I'm not a competitive person, but I do sometimes feel like those number have weight to them, set my mood for instance
@@user-js8jh6qq4l So you wrote almost the same as me, does this mean yours is also irrelevant or is mine as relevant as yours? Makes little sense, maybe you were just faster.
Who cares anyway, just giving my 2cents whatever ppl think.
I'll be damned, your response was way more to the point then my strange passage. I guess you're right, I wrote my comment pretty early. And now it's almost the top comment. Sometimes, a small difference produces vastly different results. That's like the weather forecast: we don't have precise information and the forcasts accumulate inaccuracy exponentially. As a result, there is no use in forecasting beyond 20 days into the future. That's chaos theory for you.
Always loved your vids, been watching your for along time now but this has been my personal favourite video, the details you put into the video was excellent, Thank you for the time and effort you put into your work 🤘🏻
Skall I would like to see your whole collection of weapons every video you bring out different weaponry and it all looks so beautiful and aesthetic
Can you talk about sabres?
Please🙏🏻🙏🏻
Do you know about Matt Easton at Scholargladiatoria? He's a saber man, so he talks about them a lot.
@@Psiberzerker what about scimitars?
AFAIK, that was never an official term. BTW: during the crusades, Arabs had straight swords (Saif) and only later in the 16th c. they adopted Shamshir, Kilij and Tulwar (but also Yatagan etc.). The stereotypical Arab sword is actually closer to a European Grossmesser or Falchion than any real Arab weapon (not even executioners swords!). The only Arab blade of that type I can think of is the belly dancers sword, which in turn is of rather dubious origins...
The guys over at the Academy of Historical Fencing channel just posted a video talking about the problems with modern reproductions of historical sabres, so you can check that out if you want.
Could you link me the video?
why swords? short answer, because swords.
seth ravenclaw Long answer: because longswords.
@@calamusgladiofortior2814 big answer: BECAUSE GREATSWORDS !!!
@@atmo-sphere6799 But what about Dragons?
I like it when you ramble about things. That rambling is why i'm still subscribed after all those years. nohomo
Wow....I was amazed and entertained for the whole video! You're the best out there :)
Cant wait for the review of that viking sword in the beginning
Okan Korad
I think he already did a review for it.
@@iraqigamer2407 no it wa a sword from ronin with a much simpler hilt. So even if it is that sword he changed the hilt wuch is unlikelly since it was peened if i remember corrextly
Okan Korad
Oh yeah, just noticed the different hilt.
Gentlemen who wore smallswords often did know how to use them, not all of them though.
As rambly as this topic was, I feel you covered a fairly convoluted and extensive topic rather well. There's not always one easy facet to explain away human history or behavior, and you brought that fact with you to the table. Great video, mate. Looking forward to more.
Very nice thoughts. People often overlook taking aesthetics and emotion into account when analyzing historical societies and artifacts.
there's also how swords are mainly for fighting humans
Humans are Monsters tho, so would one need a silver sword for everything 🤔
Same could be said about the spiked war hammers. It is true that their only purpose is homicide, but quite honestly you can kill someone with just about anything. I think people often forget that swords were considered sidearms for ancient/middle age soldiers. Polearms have almost always been preferred in combat, no matter the nation, and the swords come out as a last resort.
As far as status symbols go the only thing I could add to Skall's commentary is that maybe it's a phallic symbol so it was also a way of basically saying "look how manly and powerful of a gentleman I am". I don't think he really touched on that. I think they are just generally seen as symbolic power, as seen in court and ceremonial swords.
Literally every medieval weapon other than the spear and bow were also made to fight humans
The point is more about how, in general, swords compared to other weapons, are "easier" to carry.
Going around your city with a polearm isn't that comfortable. Also, in theory, swords are less likely to be damaged and are reliable to have at your side in most situations.
And the status symbol of a sword is relevant indeed, in particular if you add the fact that in a simble human vs human with no armor (situation that is supposed to happen outside of a battlefield/skirmish situation) their main problems aren't that relevant.
Let me digress a little.
Generally we observe fighting by two perspective: war and duel.
In the second scenario, there are a lot of variables where every detail may be relevant, with the skills of the figthers above the rest, in most cases.
In the first tho humans are to be considered as eusocial beings. You don't have Sir Gareth, Pierre the commoner or the master sword Giuliano fighting. You have thousands and thousands of soldiers. Here, fighting is to be focused not on defeating a single opponent, but winning the battle. It's easy to focus on what a weapon can do on the battlefield, but one shouldn't forget how entire armies are fighting at the same time. During such a situation, the skills of a single individual are less likely to change the situation. Different weapons serves a different purpose, they aren't there to please different individuals taste.
Yeah, polearms are cool and useful. But what happens when that zweihander cuts your weapon? How to do you use that sword on that heavy armored dude on a horse? A Lance isn't gonna be efficient if you horse is blocked or you stop it yourself to focus on light armored infantry soldiers like archers.
There isn't a "best weapon". Weapons serves different situations.
You can use anything to kill anything.
The real question here is:
Why *NOT* swords?
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
No this is Patrick I see you everywhere.
Because everything else works better lol.
Cause guns
Because some people are pacifists
it was nice to see all of these different swords and weapons!
Your voice is very soothing. I like listening to you rambling.
Actually, I like battle axes
I like hand granade
I like pommels
I like trains
I like trutles
I like Bolter Pistols
Well, with swords you can end them rightly.
Little hello from France !
I do not know a lot about swords and medieval weapon, that is why I would like to thank you for your job ! Your video was very interesting and instructive and help me to discover a culture that I did not know !
Congrats on 1 mill my friend!
Actually, bronze might not have had much difficulty acquiring. Yes, the base materials might have been in distant places, but there was lots if it, and there was lots of commerce around it. There were probably lots of imports and exports of bronze. And, of course... bronze was everywhere. Hence the bronze age.
Tin is actually a quite rare material. There were very few mines back in the bronze age, while copper was and still is abundant. Even today, outside of the bronze age territory, tin is still a rare mineral.
(Bronze Age) .. which ended rather abruptly when the flow of bronze (and/or tin, the more scarce ingredient) WAS eventually interrupted.
At that point, the bronze-using "high cultures" in the eastern mediterranean collapsed nearly simultaneously.
See --> czcams.com/video/bRcu-ysocX4/video.html
Also: czcams.com/video/KkMP328eU5Q/video.html
Steffen Kremser I don't have the internet for a video that long (nor the patience). The bronze age is roughly from 3,000B.C. (maybe 4,000B.C.) to 1,000B.C. Europe and Asia had much more copper and/or tin than either Africa (except maybe Egypt) or the USA. Specially along the Middle east, and Southern Europe. Asia, I can't say which areas had more bronze with as much certainty. There was plenty of bronze.
There was certainly a lot of bronze around at the time, but it was still somewhat expensive. I think I've watched/read somewhere that there were only two tin mines around the time, and once they ran dry, bronze got really expensive. In fact, the best part about the discovery of iron technology was the fact that iron was much more common than bronze.
The distance of the source doesn't matter? Say that to the spice traders even several hundred years later with the much more advanced technology of transportation. Moving sufficient amount of stuff safely over a long distance while still be able to make a profit was extremely challenging back then and downright impossible in certain regions.
The best original character I’ve ever made uses a buster-sword size blade. The twist? That sword is actually a massive hollow sheath and holds about 20 different types of swords inside of it, which he switches between in battle.
Why the fuck would you need more than 20 types of swords? They all go 'swish swish DEATH'
@@GrammarPaladin You, my good sire, have said what we all have in mind. Congratulations
Oh, like in Advent Children.
Why would you want to change blades during battle?
Cool
unrelated to the topic but I really like your background setup in this vid. Feels like I'm listening to a friend on a camping trip in the middle of the woods and just talk about random stuff. Personally I prefer it over you sitting but that's just me :p
I love these types of videos, please do more buddy.
I compare a sword to a handgun . Ease of carry . Concealability if required . Social acceptance of public possession and carry . You are not going to the pub with a spear or Viking axe or a halberd , but a sword ? Swords and daggers became very ornate because folks wanted to carry a "beautiful" weapon .
Ben Franklin
Conceal a sword? I don’t quite want to know how you do that.
Though I don’t quite think a handgun is really comparable to a sword, handguns are rarely used on the battlefield compared to other weapons, whereas there were entire warrior classes based on using the sword as their main weapon.
@@matthewpham9525 Yeah... in BC times, medieval times is archers and spear/pike men as well as cavalry. And to add onto this they are comparable as handguns are a sidearms and self defence weapons, just like swords.
"you are not gonna cut your sandwich with this" you are not the boss of me!
Another sweet video dude, you need to make a video on 40k power swords, storm shields, and chain axes
Aside from the sheer versatility of them, there is just something poetic about swords. I still retain the sheer fascination by them from when I was just a kid. They may not have the reach of a polearm, or the ease of concealment and agility of small weapons, but they are just so pretty as well as a healthy balance of a lot of aspects of weapon based combat. The sheer wide variety of them as well, that so many iterations could be made from so many places and times, the wide diversity and range of creativity in design may also add to why we remain so fascinated by them.
I think you forgot about one aspect. The skill required to use well. Anyone can thrust with a spear, or swing an axe or a mace. But to cut effectively with a sword, you need quite a bit of training.
A lot of people can't even swing anything mate
I think it more of a depth matter. You can use pretty much all techniques suitable for an axe, a mace or spear with a sword, and the basics are as easy or hard to learn with any of those weapons. And you really don't need much training to be able to kill a person with either weapon. With the sword however there's a lot more tricks to learn than with any other weapon. Edge alignment is as important for handling an axe as it is for a sword, and you have a lot less edge to work with so in that regard it's actually easier to score a proper hit with a sword than an axe...
One does not simply....
Love a sword without a Pommel
This was a fun video to absorb. Keep it up.
I would really love a video hearing about flint knapping and why those are so amazing.
The next video should be "Why Pommels?"
DEW IT. You know you want to>:D
Jlullaby >.>
Oh, you again. Alfatazer, You are there to make pommel jokes. If I ever see you I will personally throw a pummel at you.
Jk 😂
looks like someone watching shadbase
Securing the blade and handle together as well as adjusting the point of balance.
dewit
Because they are awesome end of video lol
when I first watched these videos I wasn't into swords but I'm enjoying all the videos and learning so much from them
Ya know Skall, I like you, your content seems very "real" and I don't mean to say dealing with historical arms isn't real, I just mean your content feels very personalized and yours with everything you do, I really like how in this video you just gave your two cents and your outlook on the topic, that's in the end what you'd be looking for. Thumbs up from me buddy.
8:35 I can't be the only one who thought "Phallic symbolism" in this bit?
It's pointy, men love playing with it, it's pulled out of a sheath so that it can be pushed into other people...
xD
Very perceptive. The Latin word for sword sheath is indeed "vagina."
I definitely think phallic symbolism plays a role in the appeal of swords. It's certainly not the whole reason, but I think it's a factor.
@@johnclarke7626 Vaina*
More of a pommel guy personally. Das jus me tho.
That's some content i expect from you, Skal!
I mean, cutting is pretty interesting at times, but.. That's not educational enough, not interesting enough. That's more of a show, than a real value.
History is one of the most misunderstood science there is, so it is awesome to know a little bit more about it from someone, whom is interesting to listen to and who knows what he's talking about.
You should make a video about the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of armored combat techniques such as how easy was it really to actually hit the gaps in armor as well as the effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of different weapons against armor
swords were the iPhones of the past, a cheap Phone/Spear can do the job perfectly good, but you still want the new iPhone/Sword just that everyone could see you have one.
Well yeah. The newest and most expensive Iphones and swords have a lot in common.
Like the lack of usefulness and high price they have compared to something with performance in mind.
Bloody FX ou burn
iBlade.
Actually i got nothing to say
*POMMELS*
:D :P
I came in comments just to see this comment. I'm satisfied.
Wise Wizard
You welcome
The type of sword was also a factor. Its like how while the Rapier, or Side Sword was a common self defense implement, the huge Boar hunting swords were a symbol of status and wealth.
This video has sorta come out at a good time, because Ive recently ordered and just got my first real sword! I ordered an Arms and Armor Towton Longsword, and I think(?) Ive heard Skall say it, but when you hold a real sword in your hand, it just feels right, and this one does. I ended up choosing arms and armor because of Skalls videos, so thank you for the excellent reviews and recommendations!
I think one reason it became a status symbol is because swords only exist for one reason, to kill other humans.
Spears, axes, hammers and knives all have other functions in society as well being weapons. A sword however, is a pure weapon, and has no real use as a 'work tool'.
I perfer maces
Isn't a mace a bad weapon to use against a swordsman?
I feel like the swordsman can just poke the mace dude to death
@@christiandauz3742 Mace guy wins if both have armor
Sword guy wins if both don't have armor
Am I the only one that sets the phone down and lets the ads play for Skal's and other tubers that I like a lot?
sure i have a bit of an interest in swords but lets be clear im here because you create interesting and informative videos. i watch videos on airline logistics but im just there for the youtuber who happens to have that interest. im from minnesota so skal to you Skallagrim!
Sounds of the SWORD . The sword has the life in ITSELF. Elegant yet Brutal. It Speaks through its being. Club = Primal weapon effective but Swords = Refined Evaluation Weapon.
Get two swords: one steel, one silver ;)
Sword sparring with other martial artists is one of the most exhilarating experiences I have had in my life, so I can say for me my love for swords comes from this joy
Na man, we're here for your wonderful personality and awesome beard. The swords are a wonderful bonus.
Ayy lmao
I think the main reason the sword is more popular is because they were more common. Only soldiers in battlefields had things like warhammers. Swords, civilians and law enforcers had them.
They were more popular because they were more common? Did they grow on trees?
DoctorProfessor no, but average people did get them from blacksmiths for personal defense, did carry them around for personal defense. Law enforcement also had them. Swords were the handguns of the late middle ages. Spears and warhammers and such were like the AR-15 of the middle ages. And axes like the pellet hand guns, I guess.
I was always led to believe it was the opposite- like swords were for nobility due to cost and social norms.
Swords were extremely expensive, more so than any other weapon, not even counting the cost of training. A sword would be a family heirloom that would have been inherited off of a great-grandfather or something. Civilians would only have pole-arms, quarterstaves and cheap knifes. Guards would use cudgels as their main weapon, as they're less lethal and you don't need training to use one, unlike a sword which would be incredibly expensive to learn how to use properly
Also, most blacksmiths would not know how to make a sword. Weapon-smiths and armor-smiths were specialised trades
Great episode! I agree with your considerations, but I would add another. A sword is handy and relatively unobtrusive. The average sword just hangs there, being the idea of being armed, without actually taking up one of your hands. You could go about your daily affairs without referring to it directly, socially or practically, yet it represents the potential and protection of a warrior even when you're off the battlefield, in normal clothes. It says, "We're all just hanging out having a good time or whatever, but if someone starts trouble, we're ready for that too." In a pinch, it also has tool uses and will deal with a lot of animals.
1 MILLION SKAL! Congratulations!
Swords ARE more effective against unarmed and unarmored peasants. When you have a polearm you can be rushed and grappled. But if you have a sword and you keep it back and you can hold the opponent with your off-hand and jab jab jab as many as dare come near you. If you have armor in that scenario you are basically a terminator which explains why nobles stayed nobles and peasants stayed peasants. Besides a sword is easy to carry around and you are not going to bother with carrying a spear if you are a nobleman.
I really like that cut and thrust.
Great video, Skall :)
I'm more of an axe man myself i subbed for you the weapons are just icing on the cake
Always enjoy these opinion pieces. Thanks man. #rambleon
I've also heard the argument that a sword was often seen as an extension of a phallus, so that could also be part of it, although arguably spears have the same aspect. Also, as to the "shiny" aspect, humans are attracted to shiny objects due to evolution, early evolution selected for those that checked into shiny objects, as it was most often a sign of water, which in the african savanna is incredibly important!
Like scholagladiatoria says, the sword is a decent secondary weapon you can wear and produce on demand - hence their popularity throughout history. Spears and bows are (broadly) the primary weapons of battle, but have their limitations and can't be carried everywhere and drawn quickly in daily life.
Saludos amigo me an servido mucho tus consejos
Para mis entrenamientos gracias
"I was basically rambling all over the place and talking about so many aspects of it" well yeah, that's why I watch your channel! Lots of dimensions to your videos.
Here are some thoughts and reasons, most of these definitely come from Dashiell Harrison a hema guy out in Portland Oregon. The sword is at your side, when the spear, or bow, or poleaxe, or the halberd are stowed away the sword is there ready to defend you on the street. Harrison also suggested that perhaps it's because the sword arguably takes more skill and it is a more individual's skill as too why the sword has captured our minds. A spear man can miss every thrust but as long as the unit performs and is well led, the unit will survive. But when the sword is drawn it is more that man's skill as all hell has broken lose, the spear is broken, the arrows are spent and now it is sword out. It is the difference between a 'warriors' weapon and a soldier's weapon. (Harrison does a much better job of explaining it on his blog which I cannot for the life of me find right now.)
It could also be because of many culture's focus on single combat, for example the Highlanders of Scotland emphasis on this resulted in clansmen charging and trying to find other warriors of equal renown or greater to gain more fame by besting them, and as the bards of the clans were standing by watching it would be remembered and it would be retold among their people.
I think it's interesting that despite the geographic isolated, the lack of calvary and how that changed warfare, and despite not using metal in weaponry, that in Mesoamerica swords (or their closest equivalent to them, being Macuahuitl) were ALSO associated with elite warriors and nobility, though Macuahuitl did see more widespread use in warfare then swords generally did in europe, often forming a significant part of an army's armament, probably due to the lack of calvary, though Polearms were still very very common.
I love the mirror effect, and after some time May you kan See trou it....