Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Dynamics: Transverse and Radial Components of Velocity and Acceleration

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 04. 2020
  • In this video, we introduce breaking down Position, Velocity, and Acceleration into components based on the Polar coordinate system (uses r and theta rather than x and y). The two axes that we use to break these vectors into two components are called the Transverse and Radial axes.
    This coordinate system is also referred to as the "cylindrical" coordinate system if we include a "z" coordinate to measure the elevation of the target object as well. Here however, we only take a look at 2D, which means "r" and "theta" (without "z")

Komentáře • 92

  • @marc-antoinetremblay6539
    @marc-antoinetremblay6539 Před 5 měsíci +7

    I cant believe i’ve paid 500$ for this class, and this guy just broke it down in 15min, I really hope you are a teacher, might never need this again but im subscribing just to encourage you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 měsíci +1

      That's very kind of you :) Best of luck

  • @Oscar-gx2yf
    @Oscar-gx2yf Před 3 lety +2

    The best video I've seen on this topic. Thank you!

  • @maksurdu9305
    @maksurdu9305 Před 9 měsíci

    OMG!!! I've been looking for this the whole internet!!! You're an amazing tutor.

  • @AvoRothenstein
    @AvoRothenstein Před rokem +7

    I've been having a really hard time in dynamics and didn't understand the equations or what transverse or radial acceleration and velocity were. This video gives me hope. I can't wait to watch more videos.

  • @charlesds1539
    @charlesds1539 Před 2 lety +8

    Wow! You are very good at making things clear, thank you so so much!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety

      Thank you! I enjoy explaining things and showing how even the most complicated topics can be visualized and broken down :) Especially if you give scenarios where the knowledge is actually used and applied. THat's the whole point of Engineering anyways!

  • @marelleclejon6694
    @marelleclejon6694 Před měsícem

    This is literally the best video I've ever seen!!! Good job!

    • @marelleclejon6694
      @marelleclejon6694 Před měsícem

      Okay, I said that before watching the full video, but I just got to 10:10 and my mind is blown, this is better than the best

    • @marelleclejon6694
      @marelleclejon6694 Před měsícem

      I'm not even sure how I got through physics 1 without knowing the fundamentals this video is instilling in me now

  • @Hariharan-ze3uf
    @Hariharan-ze3uf Před 3 lety +9

    Thank you! This explanation is so much better than anything else.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety

      Awesome I am glad :) I have other Dynamics videos too so feel free to check them out!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety +2

      I want people to actually understand, rather than just memorize formulas. Learning is actually fun that way...so that's how I teach!

    • @Hariharan-ze3uf
      @Hariharan-ze3uf Před 3 lety +2

      @@eng1048 Sure it is, keep up the good work bro. I'll check out the other videos and share it to my friends.

  • @amalsal9559
    @amalsal9559 Před 10 měsíci

    I came from an entirely different background and this surprisingly doesn't look scary at all. My sincere thanks and gratitude.

  • @OMARYassin1
    @OMARYassin1 Před 3 lety +1

    Your channel is just great.. and your demonstration is very clear.. keep it up

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety +1

      Great man I really appreciate your positive feedback! I love teaching Engineering and I want things to make sense

  • @abirahmed6213
    @abirahmed6213 Před 3 lety

    Really well explained man, appreciate it.

  • @ramyasrinivas3083
    @ramyasrinivas3083 Před 3 lety +3

    Excellent explanation!! Thank you

  • @pratyushpathania7030
    @pratyushpathania7030 Před 2 měsíci

    Beautiful video

  • @ProfessorDingus
    @ProfessorDingus Před 3 lety +1

    Lifesaver. My dynamics prof didn't cover this in lecture but gave a HW problem on it as if this is just obvious?!!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety +1

      Profs usually suck lol

  • @shashwatsharma9399
    @shashwatsharma9399 Před 3 lety +1

    You made it very easy to understand 👏 thank you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety

      I am glad my friend :)

  • @BODYBUILDERS_AGAINST_FEMINISM

    The way you talk is very relaxing.

  • @mohammadshabih5293
    @mohammadshabih5293 Před 10 měsíci

    thank you, this helped a lot

  • @yohannesabel7681
    @yohannesabel7681 Před 2 lety +1

    you are great bruh!

  • @himaniverma5504
    @himaniverma5504 Před 4 lety +2

    Thank you so much!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 4 lety

      Awesome! Glad it helped :)

  • @brunospasta
    @brunospasta Před 10 dny

    Thank you!

  • @OMARYassin1
    @OMARYassin1 Před 3 lety +1

    Very great video

  • @ekminigodage2724
    @ekminigodage2724 Před 3 lety

    BEST BEST BEST....Thanku so much for getting me away frm stress coz by this topic

  • @yesithwaduge4593
    @yesithwaduge4593 Před 3 lety +1

    Thank you! ❤️❤️

  • @thefuckdidyousaytomelittle7580

    Clear explanation

  • @bhargabborah4194
    @bhargabborah4194 Před 3 lety +1

    thank u so much

  • @sophialindsay6253
    @sophialindsay6253 Před 3 lety

    Thank you!!!

  • @Megha-rv2hd
    @Megha-rv2hd Před 3 lety +1

    Thx a lot 😇😇😇.. Very very helpful thing....

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety

      Thanks, glad it helped! :)

  • @fredmwanainchi6295
    @fredmwanainchi6295 Před 3 lety +1

    Thank You!

  • @devesh5739
    @devesh5739 Před 2 lety +1

    Thank you sir

  • @rayd5173
    @rayd5173 Před 2 lety

    Thanks it is well Explained

  • @Vincentvangogh65
    @Vincentvangogh65 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks

  • @valeriehawkins5358
    @valeriehawkins5358 Před rokem

    Great explanation on transverse and radical components! It helped me out a lot. I wish you explained what you mean by "True velocity is always tangent to my path" though. In a different question (same principles) how would I determine the direction of the yellow arrow (drawn at 13:18).

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před rokem +1

      To your first question:
      Remember, speed (velocity) is an instantaneous quantity. I can have one speed at one instant, and another speed at another instant. Even if my speeds are the same at two different instances, if you are facing (imagine you are driving a car on a curved path) different directions at those 2 different instants, your velocity (which is just speed but incorporating the idea of direction) is different between those 2 instants.
      So the DIRECTION of your velocity at a specific instant is basically "which direction am i facing/travelling at that instant". Think about this a little bit and hopefully the idea that "velocity is tangent to the path" will become more digestible.
      Your second question:
      If you knew the transverse (r times theta dot) and radial (r dot) components of your velocity at that instant, you can draw a right triangle and use the inverse tangent. Keep in mind that components of a vector do that tip-to-tail vector addition thing to add up to get the resultant vector. Thats why you can draw that right triangle between the radial and transverse component and the true resultant velocity vector. Once you drawn that right triangle, you can use the inverse tangent to get an angle for the actual velocity vector.

  • @duckie9923
    @duckie9923 Před 2 lety

    THANK U!

  • @raghavkumar4914
    @raghavkumar4914 Před rokem

    Helpfull for jee exam thx

  • @yourlifementor9869
    @yourlifementor9869 Před 2 lety

    Thank You

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety

      You're welcome. can i get some advice life mentor?

    • @yourlifementor9869
      @yourlifementor9869 Před 2 lety

      @@eng1048 Keep uploading this type of content 👏 👌.

  • @titanblazer9112
    @titanblazer9112 Před rokem +1

    u r hero

  • @swaroopdewal4626
    @swaroopdewal4626 Před 3 lety

    You have student from India. Awesome explanation 💙

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 Před 2 lety

    00:00
    The object is the satelite, not the dish or antennae which tracks it.

  • @drlx8708
    @drlx8708 Před 2 lety +1

    Great

  • @abdullahjan861
    @abdullahjan861 Před 3 lety

    Good vedio sir.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety

      No problem, thanks for your comment!

  • @kawambwadaniel-kd3685

    Does each instant in the motion of the particle have its own unit vector?

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před rokem

      It's more like this:
      For each instant of motion, the particle has the tranverse and radial unit vector, whose magnitude is a constant of 1, but whose direction changes

  • @nf_mendoza9767
    @nf_mendoza9767 Před 9 měsíci

    Might just need a little more videos for CZcams to recommend your channel 😮

  • @billyandmandy286
    @billyandmandy286 Před 4 lety +1

    yes yes yes el jef the machine

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 Před 2 lety

    The resultant truly does have components

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety

      give a timestamp my guy, idk what ur talking about

  • @only_one_edgy614
    @only_one_edgy614 Před 3 lety

    how u are getting the positive and negative ...thank you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety

      hello Rafi, please give time stamp

  • @tauseefshaikh7331
    @tauseefshaikh7331 Před 3 lety +1

    At last....
    Thanks pal

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 3 lety

      Thanks for the thank-you!

  • @Megha-rv2hd
    @Megha-rv2hd Před 3 lety

    Is engineering and bsc both are same thing.🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • @imback157
    @imback157 Před 3 měsíci

    Thank u sir for clear explanation but mixup hindi please sir

  • @successsteps1117
    @successsteps1117 Před 3 lety

    🙂

  • @coolbits2235
    @coolbits2235 Před měsícem

    Thumbs up if you are watching this to understand orbital mechanics

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 Před 2 lety

    Not a satelite

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety

      Hi, did you see my answer to your other question? :)

  • @fortrixtr
    @fortrixtr Před 5 měsíci

    😢😢

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 měsíci

      You have problem?

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 Před 2 lety

    -7:38 True velocity? You must be an EE, I don't think that the Magnitude of the velocity is called the true velocity. It is not like electricy where you have true power. All part of the velocity vector are real. If you were standing next to this particle it would push you sideways. It you were above it. It would push you up. It's all real.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety +1

      The only real thing is the true velocity vector. It's another word for magnitude of the velocity. I like using the word true velocity because magnitude is used all the time by textbooks and professors. I like using different words to describe the same concepts to lend additional perspective.
      Here's what I mean. In the above video, I'm telling how we can take a velocity and split it up into transverse and radial components. Well, we could take that same velocity vector and split it up into x and y components couldn't we? We make the choice of what style components based on what situation we are in. If we were calculating what motor we need, radial/transverse is the way to go (because a radial/transverse approach gets us angular speed). If we were maybe trying to calculate the total distance travelled by a particle , x/y might be the way to go.
      So for this reason, the choice of components to use is subjective, it depends on the context. See what I mean? I try to remind students that the only REAL, TRUE thing that's going on is that you have a velocity vector.
      I think I see where you're coming from but hopefully I've illuminated why wording choice here :)

  • @bokyung8322
    @bokyung8322 Před 2 lety +1

    perfect explanation! Thank you!!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Před 2 lety

      thanks for the positive comment!