Why Are There 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 Rubik's Cube Combinations?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 06. 2020
  • The math behind the number of Rubik's Cube combinations/permutations/positions or whatever you want to call it.
    Cube ► JPerm 356 XS: speedcubeshop.com/products/jp...
    SpeedCubeShop ► speedcubeshop.com
    Using the code "JPERM" supports my channel and also gives you a discount on your order.
    Beginner:
    2x2 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a 2...
    3x3 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a R...
    4x4 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a 4...
    5x5 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a 5...
    Special Tutorials:
    3x3 One Handed ► • Rubik's Cube: How To S...
    3x3 Blindfolded ► • (New) How to Solve the...
    Advanced Tutorials:
    2x2 ► • How to Get Fast at 2x2
    3x3 ► • Beginner + CFOP Method
    4x4 ► • How to Get Fast at 4x4
    5x5+ ► • How to Get Fast at 5x5...
    Facebook ► / jpermcubing
    F2L Algs ► bit.ly/bestf2l
    Patreon ► / jperm
    Merch ► teespring.com/stores/jperm
    Algorithm Trainer ► jperm.net
    Written Tutorials ► jperm.net
    Special thanks to these generous Patrons:
    Erika Greggs, sanjay, tim rossetti, Bruce, Tyler Schwartz, James Baggins, Adam Stankiewicz, Eero, Benny Salomon, Umar, Lv.99 Mastermind, Chris, kubesolver, Benson Giang, Idan Sahar, Dcs Banana, Unknownraven, Asteroid, Leland Hoagland, Broxson Barnhill, Ivan Marinkovic, someone 1, Derek Worth, Inventor of Loob46, Eisen Vigilia, Dawson Wilson, Sesha Sai Patro, Gregory Martin, Pete Ryland, Jan Strohbeck, KingIceCream, Victor Giaquinto, Dan Stonestreet, Stephen Lee, becker, Priyam Brahmkshatriya, Mikail Oickle, Aaron Morales Dolich, Jason Roberge, jeroen Riepma, hector, whichonemi, Shayan Gupta, Miro Nikakis, Hudson, monzo74 ., Jasper, Kush Khanolkar, MELISSA J CLAGUE, Khôi Nguyên, Sahasvat, Arav Trilokekar, Huy Nguyen, Tobias, Shawn Campbell, Lychee Lim, Alexandre Boutot, Michael Mendoza, ChellaDOS, Albert Cinca, Alex Moscibroda, Adam Jonsson, Agastya Kartikeyan, Bruhath B, Brandon Winecki, Helios IOS, Evan McDonnell, Relaxed Cubing, MaximCraftAnimations, Lewis Sutton, Nakano Kyohei, Cube Sapiens, Leszek Gawron, Ed Connell, Chris Bonnello, Edan Maor, Xiaotian Li, Riley Lee, Michael Conard, Johnathan Starkey, Those Nerds, Benjamin Force, Isaac Farnsworth, James Moore, Csaba Daday, Dmitri Shabes, Ram Thakkar, kavish, Mirzo, Aidan Gerick, Bernhard Kofler, Cade Watson, Paul Thorley, Amay Saxena, Weisselberger Timothee, Philippe Schwartz, Pontus Uggla, Takeshi Yanagita, Jane Qiao, Adam Prato, Ricky Robber, GEKO3, Leo Taylor, Jai Chapman, Fuzzy Sanders, Cubing Madness, DeePee 3O5, Steph Mercier, iko23, Hugo, Karen Hakobyan, Mark James, Spencer Gray, Tom Blanco, Niko Nyrhilä, Tino Klech, Nathan Last, John Adams, Eeebee, Jochen Bauer, Letin, Ruimin Yan, Benjamin Jonassen, RedKB, Sebastian Szafran, Fred Strauss, Danny Williams, Rick Lush, Chris Cobb, Adam Rosales, Martijn Schiedon, David Brown, Taco, Mike Sampson, Siege Wolfe, Rob Peters, Miranda Manning

Komentáře • 3,2K

  • @davidbird7646
    @davidbird7646 Před 4 lety +6567

    in a 2x2 there are only 8 combinations because there are 8 pieces. thanks for choosing my comment as the right answer in advance 😊

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +525

      SERIOUSLY J PERM WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING MY REAL SOLUTION HERE LOL
      EDIT: WHY AGAIN J PERM. I'VE TRIED IT 3 TIMES ALREADY
      EDIT 2: i get that some people want to do it themselves, so just find my other comment (or someone else's), but good luck finding one lol
      EDIT 3: J Perm said that he isn't deleting them and CZcams is, so I'll contact CZcams to see the reason.

    • @twistiicuber1055
      @twistiicuber1055 Před 4 lety +226

      Matthew Liu maybe there’s a blacklisted word, or maybe CZcams in censoring something, or maybe he actually is deleting your replies lol

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +90

      @@twistiicuber1055 that is true

    • @21lhy
      @21lhy Před 4 lety +173

      How bout a 1x1

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +43

      @@twistiicuber1055 also he still hasn't deleted my third attempt doing it

  • @sishi2962
    @sishi2962 Před 3 lety +3036

    Teacher: what's 3x3x3?
    Me: 43 quintillion

    • @sukichan5288
      @sukichan5288 Před 3 lety +69

      U-U..............😅did you get it correctteacher:😳okay....
      Edit 1: like for a part two of dis

    • @sukichan5288
      @sukichan5288 Před 3 lety +37

      😡WRONG *teacher is so done* .....
      Edit1:hope you enjoy dis little skit I made

    • @manthespoon
      @manthespoon Před 3 lety +1

      B̑̈lue rain c͜͡loudsꨄ Thunder clouds lmao

    • @anklebreaker2596
      @anklebreaker2596 Před 3 lety +7

      It’s quintillion

    • @Fb_Sim_Cyan_Friend
      @Fb_Sim_Cyan_Friend Před 3 lety +9

      3 x 3 = 9

  • @noidea5106
    @noidea5106 Před 4 lety +1242

    For 2x2: no matter how scrambled it is, you can always rotate the cube to solve the UFR corner(red white green), so instead of having the centers as a reference, we need to have the ufr corner. On a 2x2, you can just swap 2 pieces and you explained why in the impossible case video. There are 8 corners but one is fixed so there are only 7 corners that can be unsolved. 7!. They can al be twisted freely except for one of them, the ufl for example. So 3^7/3x7!=3674160

    • @JPerm
      @JPerm  Před 4 lety +448

      Having 1 fixed corner and 7 moveable corners is a great way of thinking about it!

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +73

      Nice!
      My solution was just to multiply 3^7 and 8! together and then divide by 24 because there are 6 × 4 = 24 ways to orient the puzzle
      Your solution took out that 24 in the first calculation, which is in my opinion, a better way of thinking about it :)

    • @603.F0Z
      @603.F0Z Před 4 lety +16

      No idea. Oh yeah, it’s Big Brain Time

    • @kobisonego6008
      @kobisonego6008 Před 4 lety +7

      That’s really smart thinking, but I don’t get why you can swap only two corners on a two by two, isn’t it related to the inter edges in some way

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +14

      @@603.F0Z lol you can think of it this way
      There are 3^7 ways of orienting the corners and 8! ways of permuting them (like J Perm said in the video)
      The difference is that there are no centers on a 2×2. A solved state with White Top Green Front is the same as a solved state with Green Top and Red Front etc. There are 24 ways of orienting the cube, so we divide what we have be 24.
      3^7 × 8! / 24 = 3674160

  • @Mr.Moo69
    @Mr.Moo69 Před 3 lety +1593

    Finally a CZcamsr that went to college

    • @johnp.6692
      @johnp.6692 Před 3 lety +61

      Hey, do not measure intelligence by
      people who went to college or not

    • @sparkgaming5100
      @sparkgaming5100 Před 3 lety +69

      @@johnp.6692 he ment math and stuff. Not inteligence theres a diffrence

    • @johnp.6692
      @johnp.6692 Před 3 lety +6

      @@sparkgaming5100 math? colleg£?
      A difference

    • @Its_FamilyGuy
      @Its_FamilyGuy Před 3 lety +8

      @@johnp.6692 when did he do that...

    • @johnp.6692
      @johnp.6692 Před 3 lety +1

      @@Its_FamilyGuy what?

  • @trident_4928
    @trident_4928 Před 3 lety +678

    This guy teaches me more than my school ever will.

  • @kazumabutworse
    @kazumabutworse Před 4 lety +1234

    There's a new method:
    You need to memorize all 43 quintilion combination and just reverse it all

  • @cabbageboi6365
    @cabbageboi6365 Před 3 lety +58

    Everybody's gangsta until he smashes the cube

  • @lutimstrickshots9253
    @lutimstrickshots9253 Před 2 lety +15

    There are 3,674,160 possible solvable combination of pieces in a 2x2 Rubik's cube. The corners can be positioned in any way so there are 8! = 40,320 possible combinations. 7 of the 8 corners can be oriented in any way so there are 3^7 = 2,187 combinations. Multiplying these two results gives us 88,179,840. But there are no fixed centers on the 2x2, and there are 24 ways to orient the centers, so we divide 88,179,840 by 24 which gives us the answer of 3,674,160.

  • @thectheb
    @thectheb Před 4 lety +636

    When you're a cuber and a maths teacher

    • @alexanderwatson9845
      @alexanderwatson9845 Před 4 lety +5

      Is he a maths teacher!?

    • @603.F0Z
      @603.F0Z Před 4 lety +23

      Alexander Watson no he’s just smart

    • @603.F0Z
      @603.F0Z Před 4 lety +3

      U got 69 likes my dude

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +16

      @@603.F0Z its actually pretty basic math.
      He is really smart though (like solving a square 1 with no help, solve a 4x4 into a 2x2 etc)

    • @mikoajmackowiak6993
      @mikoajmackowiak6993 Před 4 lety +5

      @@MatthewLiuCube yeah, it's not that hard to do that math, but explaining it so easy is kinda hard.

  • @spacedragon2753
    @spacedragon2753 Před 4 lety +215

    2x2 has 3.674.160 possible combinations. Here's why:
    Any permutation of the eight corners is possible (8! positions), and seven of them can be independently rotated (3^7 positions). There is nothing identifying the orientation of the cube in space, reducing the positions by a factor of 24. This is because all 24 possible positions and orientations of the first corner are equivalent due to the lack of fixed centers. This factor does not appear when calculating the permutations of N×N×N cubes where N is odd, since those puzzles have fixed centers which identify the cube's spatial orientation.
    So, the number of possible positions of the cube is (8!*3^7)/24 = 3.674.160

    • @JPerm
      @JPerm  Před 4 lety +61

      Good explanation!

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +5

      @@JPerm that was my solution, I've also seen the fixed corner solution (which you replied to, so I won't explain it here)
      How did you solve this problem?

    • @sevopaper984
      @sevopaper984 Před 4 lety +1

      @@MatthewLiuCube Wow, first I thought that both solutions are the same but I was wrong...
      The cool thing about orientation of the 2x2 is you can determine it 2 different ways.
      Given the fact the 2x2 is engineered like a 3x3 you actually can use the core as a reference point, the corners could be in a solved state in 6x4=24 different orientations as mentioned by SpaceDragon.
      But the cube's orientation is also determined by choosing a corner and it's orientation which is actually Not the same maths: it's 8x3=24. So here 8!/8=7! and (3^7)/3=3^6 which gives you the calculation of fixed corner solution.
      TLDR:
      1. Take a 3x3 and cancel the orientation relative to the core (6x4=24) out
      OR
      2. Cancel the orientation with fixed corner (8x3=24) and then calculate the canceled version.

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety

      @@sevopaper984 technically it is the same, but at the same time it is not

    • @sevopaper984
      @sevopaper984 Před 4 lety

      @@MatthewLiuCube Yeah, I think it is cool that with different approaches you get the same answer.

  • @humango215
    @humango215 Před 3 lety +55

    On a 2x2 the number is:smaller
    Reason:less pieces

  • @Nullicity
    @Nullicity Před 3 lety +39

    “We have to think about what the rubiks cube actually is” *smashes cube*
    i shit my pants

  • @fateenergy1360
    @fateenergy1360 Před 3 lety +944

    This guy sounds like a combination of MrBeast and Daily Dose of Internet.

  • @That1LucaGuy
    @That1LucaGuy Před 4 lety +23

    I love how you simplified this for the ones who are new to cubing or not into the math as much. You also did a very good job making the process very clear. Very well done!

  • @laspil
    @laspil Před 3 lety +22

    I love how organized the pieces are.

  • @beepergeedle1942
    @beepergeedle1942 Před 3 lety +231

    I learned more in this video than my math teacher ever has taught me

  • @Chopsticks-ef4il
    @Chopsticks-ef4il Před 4 lety +164

    imagine if someone just said he’s bad and he’s lying about impossible cases

    • @mrarithefox
      @mrarithefox Před 4 lety +30

      JpErM iS bAd At SoLvInG a RuBiKs CuBe!! ThErE iS nO sUcH tHiNg As A iMpOsSiBlE cAsE. YoU kNoW wHaT? jUsT pEeL oFf ThE sTiCkErS!

    • @2chill2bbored72
      @2chill2bbored72 Před 4 lety

      Alberto is a duck please be a joke

    • @mrarithefox
      @mrarithefox Před 4 lety +6

      @@2chill2bbored72 i spent 3 minutes writing that and you think that isnt a joke?

    • @goldenwarrior1186
      @goldenwarrior1186 Před 4 lety +5

      Chillboard’s Alt Wasteyard If someone does the alternating upper case lower case thing, it means they’re joking

    • @atc5412
      @atc5412 Před 4 lety +3

      Non-cubers'd say that
      My dad once tried to make me solve an edge flip

  • @ndas1114
    @ndas1114 Před 4 lety +18

    I hope this is right:
    For 2x2 because there aren't any edges the corners can be permuted in any way so there's a total of 8! ways, or 40320 possible permutations. As for orientation the first 7 corners can be oriented in any way, whereas the last one must be oriented in a specific way, so the total possible orientations is 3^7, or 2187. Multiplying 2187 by 40320 yields 88179840. However, the lack of fixed centers on a 2x2 is not accounted for. The above calculation assumes fixed centers, and since centers can be oriented in 24 different ways the number must be divided by 24 (because changing center orientation doesn't have an impact on the scramble for 2x2), and 88179840 divided by 24 gets the actual answer of 3674160 possible scrambles on a 2x2.

    • @JPerm
      @JPerm  Před 4 lety +5

      Correct! For anyone wondering, the reason there are 24 cube orientations is because of 6x4. You can have any of 6 sides on top, and then any of its 4 sides centers on the front.

    • @shahanshahpolonium
      @shahanshahpolonium Před 4 lety +1

      @@JPerm hey Jperm any idea on bigger cubes? eg a 4x4 where you also should take center pieces and another edge piece

    • @lesserscr
      @lesserscr Před 3 lety

      Ok ur smart I’m dumb. I’ll just have to deal with it

  • @parbinsultana8566
    @parbinsultana8566 Před 2 lety +29

    You can become a really good professor. I really like the way you explain, and I am sure many people also like your way of explanation.

  • @francissanto12
    @francissanto12 Před 3 lety +1

    this is a great visual explanation, awesome video

  • @marcoaltamura7512
    @marcoaltamura7512 Před 4 lety +16

    That's why we all love Jperm: clear explanation as always, best tutorials ever...
    Thanks Jperm for making such interesting content!

  • @ethannguyen711
    @ethannguyen711 Před 4 lety +45

    0:17 *Cube Solve Hero wants to know your location*

    • @cuberdoge22
      @cuberdoge22 Před 4 lety +1

      Give me bread for my ducks 🦆

    • @cristiansigua6664
      @cristiansigua6664 Před 4 lety +3

      Z1hcツ but bread is unhealthy for duck since it causes bloating which eventually causes erosion which is bad

    • @queijoduke
      @queijoduke Před 4 lety

      Canadialand

  • @derpygamer4077
    @derpygamer4077 Před 3 lety +1

    Amazingly explained!

  • @aaronbarrett2615
    @aaronbarrett2615 Před 9 měsíci

    Wonderful derivation, thanks man

  • @irinelrotaru5442
    @irinelrotaru5442 Před 4 lety +47

    Me: Watching food videos.
    Notification: Jperm just posted a video.
    Me: Food is not good.

  • @mikoajmackowiak6993
    @mikoajmackowiak6993 Před 4 lety +13

    Finally, real-life math usage.

  • @MrJpleb
    @MrJpleb Před 3 lety +5

    A 2x2 has no centers, so there is technically only one way to insert the first corner, meaning 7! corner permutations. For this same reason, the first corner can only be flipped one way, and the last corner cannot be flipped for it to be solvable, which means 3^6 orientations. Thus, the total ends up being 7! * 3^6 = 3,674,160 possible positions. Great video! By far the best explanation on this topic that I've ever seen!

  • @jeremie4174
    @jeremie4174 Před 3 lety

    Clever approach!

  • @cristiansigua6664
    @cristiansigua6664 Před 4 lety +20

    Cause why not

    • @ryanspicer5931
      @ryanspicer5931 Před 4 lety

      You are 1st, congrats

    • @andrew_wwang
      @andrew_wwang Před 4 lety

      Ryan Spicer You do realize nobody cares

    • @cristiansigua6664
      @cristiansigua6664 Před 4 lety +1

      Zixuan Lei I misread the title as is there blank blank blank combinations so I said yes

    • @arifwazir3584
      @arifwazir3584 Před 4 lety

      @@cristiansigua6664 my friend, you really are first

  • @amanrawat9458
    @amanrawat9458 Před 4 lety +48

    Yo man, this story is true...
    I was walking down the street when suddenly a V PERM came and stopped me..
    He warned me that no matter how good cubing techniques I learn, he will still come again and again to ruin my solves.
    He also told me that his partners 'THE G PERMS' will also help him.
    😥😥😥😥😥

  • @jastew8814
    @jastew8814 Před 3 lety +1

    I needed this for my assignment thanks

  • @Inclatable
    @Inclatable Před 2 lety

    I had watched this video a while back not having done any probabilities at the time. This week we started learning about it and I remembered this video, thnx to u I already have a pretty clear understanding

  • @colosalz
    @colosalz Před 4 lety +6

    This uploaded 1 min ago, but i can tell this will go viral

  • @ErinKrasniqi
    @ErinKrasniqi Před 3 lety +31

    Math teacher: this is very easy, learn it N O W
    Me: what does this mean

    • @epicgamez0150
      @epicgamez0150 Před 3 lety

      Because it is very easy and you never went to school

  • @ranjitagupta7365
    @ranjitagupta7365 Před 3 lety

    I learn probability in this video, thanks man, everytime when i tried to learn I have some confusion, you teach me more than my school, i appreciate it. Thanks.

  • @guiposf2662
    @guiposf2662 Před 3 lety

    Incredible video jperm

  • @Ramanvir
    @Ramanvir Před 3 lety +5

    This is whole new level of PROBABILITY

  • @dahamstergaming4029
    @dahamstergaming4029 Před 4 lety +201

    The dislikes are cubesolvehero fans who are mad he stole his breakdown techniques

  • @bts7jk24
    @bts7jk24 Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks for the best explanation ☺️.....

  • @cubealgorithmist3731
    @cubealgorithmist3731 Před 2 lety

    THAT'S AMAZING BRO!!!

  • @animeshdash
    @animeshdash Před 4 lety +3

    cube solve hero:Satisfying Cube Magic
    Jperm: I am about to steal his magic
    cube solve hero :Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  • @dwagonyt
    @dwagonyt Před 3 lety +4

    J perm: Just a simple multiplication problem.
    Me: Visible confusion.

  • @skm8838
    @skm8838 Před 3 lety

    Thanks for the math class

  • @rachit_joshi
    @rachit_joshi Před 10 měsíci

    Easily Explained Very Interesting !!!!!!

  • @rohitocookie
    @rohitocookie Před 4 lety +16

    Me: ImMa geT hErE eARlY
    CZcams: "379 comments"
    me: shoot

  • @gunnar2288
    @gunnar2288 Před 4 lety +35

    friend: i am sub 40, now i am a real cuber!!
    me: do you know Jperm?
    friend: no who is that
    me: sorry but you are not a real cuber...
    friend: oh now im sad :(

    • @rnoze6938
      @rnoze6938 Před 4 lety +5

      Well technically as soon as you try to solve a cube as fast as possible you're a cuber

    • @theqber
      @theqber Před 4 lety +2

      @@rnoze6938 nope... u need to know j perm to be a cuber :)

    • @altrekzz9870
      @altrekzz9870 Před 4 lety +2

      Nice gate keeping there bud.

    • @nikitakusuma8440
      @nikitakusuma8440 Před 4 lety

      Friend : I am sub 40, now I am a real cuber!
      Me (a cuber) : do you know J Perm?
      Friend : no, who is that
      Me (a cuber) : a famous Youcuber, watch his channel so you'll become a better cuber

  • @FareSkwareGamesFSG
    @FareSkwareGamesFSG Před 3 lety +2

    Use the similar logic from the 3x3x3 corner permutations (8!*3^7). Realize that the cube itself doesn't have a fixed position like the 3x3x3 due to a lack of fixed centers. Count the number of possible ways of orienting the 2x2x2 in space (24). Exclude those possiblities by dividing the former by the latter (8!*3^7/24): 3,674,160. Q.E.D.
    This was fun! :)

  • @raphaelpellegrini2896
    @raphaelpellegrini2896 Před 3 lety

    very good video!

  • @tbrody846
    @tbrody846 Před 4 lety +3

    There are 3,674,160 combinations on the 2x2 rubik's cube. If one corner always stays the same, it eliminates any impossible solutions. So, the other 7 corners (7!) multiplied by their twists, with the last one as you said, being one (3^6) - multiply, and you get 7! * 3^6 = 3,674,160

    • @sevopaper984
      @sevopaper984 Před 4 lety

      Right! Good comment, I was a bit to late for the video to write one myself.

  • @MasterBlakeYT
    @MasterBlakeYT Před 3 lety +4

    The number in the title just made me click the video

  • @The_Jordanator
    @The_Jordanator Před 2 měsíci +1

    0:17 when you have been watching a tutorial for hours and can't figure out the last part.

  • @jaddoj3791
    @jaddoj3791 Před 2 lety

    That smashing noise when he destroyed the cube was so satisfying.

  • @JustKawz_
    @JustKawz_ Před 3 lety +3

    4:18 What in god's holy name was that

  • @andwueeee9265
    @andwueeee9265 Před 4 lety +17

    0:17 Cubesolvehero: Impossible

    • @eduardorizo8264
      @eduardorizo8264 Před 4 lety +1

      I don’t get it I’m sorry 😐 please don’t say r/whoosh

    • @benqbtw8881
      @benqbtw8881 Před 4 lety +1

      @@eduardorizo8264 r/wooosh

    • @benqbtw8881
      @benqbtw8881 Před 4 lety +1

      @@eduardorizo8264 jk it's a youtuber check hes channel

    • @andwueeee9265
      @andwueeee9265 Před 4 lety

      @@eduardorizo8264 Cubesolvehero is a CZcams cubing channel that is famous for his cool editing and how he breaks apart his cubes

  • @mikethemachinist1
    @mikethemachinist1 Před 10 měsíci +1

    J Perm,
    I'm 55, I first saw a 3 by 3 in 1981 when I was in 8th grade. I didn't own one however I did fiddle-faddle around with one for a while but was soon overwhelmed so figured it was something for The Geek Squad kids to mess with. Fast-forward the tape to 40 odd years later and I've just now solved my first Cube thanks to your video I think I have set some kind of record! That young guy that did it and under or just over three seconds yeah I'm on the other end of the spectrum J it took me like 42 years 9 months 6 days and 3 hours LOL, anyhow I love you videos I love how you break it down and explain things so the common person can understand I am a machinist by trade as you well know by my title I'm no dummy it's just I never figured it out but your algorithms and stuff surely help so far my fastest time is 7 minutes and 16 seconds. Certainly not earth-shattering by any stretch but I'm working on it I just want to thank you again. Mike The Machinist

  • @Theoretically88
    @Theoretically88 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Awesome video ❤💚💛🤍🧡💙

  • @seegul7104
    @seegul7104 Před 4 lety +40

    I swear this guy is secretly like a Einstein reincarnated as your friendly neighborhood cuber

    • @liammcqueeney8768
      @liammcqueeney8768 Před 3 lety

      it's not that complicated lmao this is like highschool math

    • @seegul7104
      @seegul7104 Před 3 lety

      @@Hisname22 im sorry if im insulting Einstein

  • @BambooNtertainmentIsEpic
    @BambooNtertainmentIsEpic Před 4 lety +50

    Poor Dylan had to promote cubesolvehero by smashing his beautiful XS on a hard wooden desk
    RIP Eric the Edge piece
    Edit: thanks for that crazy amount of likes

    • @cat9448
      @cat9448 Před 4 lety +2

      rip the xs, thank god he has like 7 of them

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety

      he may have taken a stock xs and put on the j perm logo, but i obviously can't confirm that

    • @hex2926
      @hex2926 Před 4 lety +1

      @@MatthewLiuCube Speedcubeshop made an exclusive gan xs just for him and sent it to him. That's the cube in the video. They also did this for some of other cubers that they sponsor.

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety

      @@hex2926 ik. what im saying is if he wanted to spare his special XS he could have taken the center cap off and put it on a stock xs

    • @Nogitsune1
      @Nogitsune1 Před 4 lety

      I'm kinda sad even tho it was cut but I can't even afford a Gan XS

  • @THEUNKNOWN-ez4yk
    @THEUNKNOWN-ez4yk Před 2 lety

    I didnt get any of this but it was so interesting I kept watching

  • @sniporama
    @sniporama Před 3 lety

    Very good video

  • @auxtinyt8386
    @auxtinyt8386 Před 3 lety +20

    Me:This is like a math question
    My brain: EMPTY!

  • @kyecarretero7693
    @kyecarretero7693 Před 4 lety +4

    0:05 me when I just did 1000 solves

  • @CubanCubeFan
    @CubanCubeFan Před 2 lety

    love the mathematics angle

  • @abdouhaberraih3863
    @abdouhaberraih3863 Před 3 lety

    Very nice and fun brain exercise

  • @promindplayer2468
    @promindplayer2468 Před 3 lety +4

    6:51
    "Non-cubers were right
    cubing is math-related "

  • @ashishsaxena4005
    @ashishsaxena4005 Před 4 lety +3

    A 2*2 has 3,674,160 combinations because
    a 2*2 doesn't have a core so every face of the solved state is different and we have 4 different positiins for each face which is 6*4=24 then for every corner we can put a corner anywhere except the last one (like you said) which becomes 8! then we have 3 positions for each corner except last one so that becomes 3^7*8! divided by 24 which equals 3,674,160
    Congratulations,if you read the whole thing

  • @pubgduoslayer5401
    @pubgduoslayer5401 Před 3 lety

    Omg mind blowing 🔥

  • @rouceluce
    @rouceluce Před 3 lety

    im learning this probability math in algebra rn :O

  • @trfcuber6642
    @trfcuber6642 Před 4 lety +16

    0:16 *reminded me from something...*

    • @cuberdoge22
      @cuberdoge22 Před 4 lety +3

      Do you have bread I need bread

    • @vinayaktyagi1001
      @vinayaktyagi1001 Před 4 lety

      @@cuberdoge22 bro your chicken is hungry or it was dog I suppose 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @abstractassassin8767
      @abstractassassin8767 Před 4 lety

      CSH....

    • @UncleSam-md9nt
      @UncleSam-md9nt Před 4 lety

      They say that mimicry is the greatest form of jealousy. -Tyler Toney of dude perfect. Lol

  • @madhuriwaghule3281
    @madhuriwaghule3281 Před 3 lety +3

    I'll sleep early tonight,
    Also me at 3 am:

  • @michaelchinchilla8119

    Happy new year

  • @dpcubing1521
    @dpcubing1521 Před 3 lety

    I hope this video finds it way into math classes!

  • @dreadlord7948
    @dreadlord7948 Před 3 lety +13

    0:08
    "Number EXE had stopped working"

    • @gpt-jcommentbot4759
      @gpt-jcommentbot4759 Před 3 lety

      check out Grahams Number and TREE(3), if you think thats big then this will make your mind explode.

    • @dante4.-
      @dante4.- Před 3 lety

      A tree of threes

  • @BiagioP
    @BiagioP Před 3 lety +8

    I guess nobody took notice that the video is 6 minutes and 54 seconds long.
    6 sides and 54 squares...

  • @Ch4rmanderrr
    @Ch4rmanderrr Před 2 lety

    i really just actually learnt what a factorial is in this video

  • @JLCubing
    @JLCubing Před 3 lety +1

    0:16 Cube solve hero's style of dissasembling cubes* SMASH!

  • @jsquared9848
    @jsquared9848 Před 4 lety +19

    When a cuber teaches you more than you're math teacher

  • @jonahplayscello
    @jonahplayscello Před 3 lety +3

    When the teacher asks you to explain

  • @mustafatarig5412
    @mustafatarig5412 Před 2 lety

    التوافيق والتباديل علم رياضي جميل 🌹😘

  • @cadaankaa
    @cadaankaa Před 2 lety +1

    For 2x2: The intuitive answer would be 8! x 3^8 / 3 (88,179,840). But since there are no middle pieces, the first corner you place does not really have 8 choices because there is nothing it is being positioned relative to. But after the first piece is placed, the second piece has 7 positions relative to that and so on. Also, we would have to lock the position of the first piece in terms of orientation, otherwise we'd get duplicates because every actual position could be attained three different ways, one for each of the ways we orient the first piece. Seems if we divide that first number by 24 we'd get the right number. (3,674,160).

  • @Dani-hy8ie
    @Dani-hy8ie Před 3 lety +7

    I love how he just did not care about smacking the Rubik’s cube on the floor

  • @yscubing1836
    @yscubing1836 Před 4 lety +21

    “I thought cubing wasn’t math related”

    • @MatthewLiuCube
      @MatthewLiuCube Před 4 lety +1

      There are 3674160 permutations on a 2×2 Cube.
      We can calculate this similarly, but not completely the same.
      There are 8! × 3^7 ways to arrange the corners and permute them, like how J Perm said in the video, but there are no centers on it, which means that you will get duplicate scrambles. This number is 88179840
      Think of it this way. If you had a solved 2×2 when holding white top green front, it is the same as holding it green top white front, both are the same scramble (in this case, the solved state)
      You have 6 options for which side it on top and 4 for which is on the front, and then the last four sides will be determined automatically. This means that we have 6 × 4 = 24 times too many permutations.
      All we need to do now is to divide 88179840 by 24 to get the magic number 3674160.

    • @speedcubertamil6558
      @speedcubertamil6558 Před 4 lety

      Me too

    • @gamingcuber2266
      @gamingcuber2266 Před 4 lety

      YS Cubing heh thats what i said

    • @leo17921
      @leo17921 Před 4 lety

      @Carbonic Potassium Detection Contraption 20

    • @flintage
      @flintage Před 4 lety

      kinda is kinda not

  • @i_am_kwat
    @i_am_kwat Před 3 lety +2

    0:17
    Cube: What's happening!

  • @nevik_o2050
    @nevik_o2050 Před 2 lety

    jperm is so good at math bro like BECOME MY TEACHER for both speedcubing and math

  • @PrxbhRBLX
    @PrxbhRBLX Před 3 lety +16

    Not a single soul:
    Me: Tries to figure out how to say that number

    • @jared4575
      @jared4575 Před 3 lety +2

      Forty three quintillion two hundred fifty two quadrillion three trillion two hundred seventy four billion four hundred eighty nine million eight hundred fifty six thousand

    • @yeetplayzroblox211
      @yeetplayzroblox211 Před 3 lety

      @@jared4575 w o w

    • @zdoh-RandomHandle
      @zdoh-RandomHandle Před 3 lety

      @@jared4575 43.252Qi

  • @2jz932
    @2jz932 Před 3 lety +3

    Lol so with davidbird754’s pinned comment theory the 3x3 would have 43.252.003.274.489.856.000 pieces 🤣

  • @yaswanthnani6563
    @yaswanthnani6563 Před 3 lety

    Basic perumatiation amd combination..easy easy.

  • @avaneeshpatil5729
    @avaneeshpatil5729 Před 3 lety

    The reason that on 2x2 you can't just take the corners of 3x3 equations is because on of the corners is attached to the center on a 2x2 so it can not be removed or corner twisted, meaning that instead of using 8 in the eqaution, you would use 7.

  • @pterosaur5634
    @pterosaur5634 Před 3 lety +6

    This video teaches me more than my whole life in school will ever will.

  • @TheCubeSolver
    @TheCubeSolver Před 4 lety +4

    Well' I've been thinking about that 43 quintillon permutations and finally, an explanation that I can understand.

  • @MiladeyDolce
    @MiladeyDolce Před 3 lety +1

    J Perm: Casually breaks Rubix cube
    Me: *Spits out water*

  • @leonvachlis4836
    @leonvachlis4836 Před rokem

    by a 2x2 you can have swapped corners, so it is 8! x 3^7. you can have swapped corners because if there are 2 corners swapped, there are also 2 edge pieces swapped which you can't see. (the internal pieces)

  • @militsa7214
    @militsa7214 Před 3 lety +20

    Welcome to everyone that got this reccomended this at 2 AM

  • @DragonFlameXYC
    @DragonFlameXYC Před 4 lety +6

    My sister accused me of lying when I told her this
    so I showed her this video
    her brain is now mush
    anti-sibling tactics

  • @fenek6562
    @fenek6562 Před 3 lety

    0:16 Gosh that was smooth

  • @celestemartin7711
    @celestemartin7711 Před 3 lety +1

    This man just gave me a mental breakdown with a god damn *CUBE*

  • @sans5955
    @sans5955 Před 4 lety +5

    Your jump cut is smoother than cube solve hero’s

  • @davidm0934
    @davidm0934 Před 4 lety +3

    WHEN THERE IS PLL PARITY ON 4x4, WHY IS THERES NO ALGS FOR THE PARITY CASE?

    • @sahnetorte1234
      @sahnetorte1234 Před 4 lety

      Because a 4×4 has hidden edges inside. A 3×3 dont.

    • @Charovfam5364
      @Charovfam5364 Před 4 lety

      There are algs for parity on 4x4. Learn Lucas Parity and Drew Parity.

    • @davidm0934
      @davidm0934 Před 4 lety +1

      @@Charovfam5364 I know, im talking about an pll alg for all cases instead of doing parity plus the pll. By the way Lucas and Drew is for oll

    • @nikitakusuma8440
      @nikitakusuma8440 Před 4 lety

      David Mousaelian there are set of algs to solve the PLL along with the PLL parity. One of them is the O Perm. Search it on google.

  • @amurderer4964
    @amurderer4964 Před 3 lety +1

    *NICE CALCULATION*

  • @tiffanysaltsmanbaxter1901

    this guy sounds like a math teacher making a youtube video