People need to understand this monitor is targeting competitive tactical FPS players like CS2 and Valorant. There are over 1 million players playing CS2 everyday and among them a lot are willing to lower their resolution just to get higher FPS and those are their potential target customers. If you are looking for monitor with better graphics that means you are out of the loop.
THANKYOU !!! Finally someone telling the truth about this product and its market. I really dislike how he downplays and gives a bad review about this monitor before it even releases.
@@user-vn8dc7rn1z it's a highly competitive game, it's not about being "unable to enjoy the graphics", it's about playing in the best optimal condition
@@UpgradeLemonade Yeah its mostly people who don't own oleds that say this. I've been using an LG C2 since release on my desk for productivity and games with 0 burn in. I literally leave the screen on with static windows taskbar, wallpaper and shortcuts along with all my 3d programs for hours at a time on purpose to see if i can fuck with the screen. So far with the OLED care and pixel cleaning it's been a non issue. I think the burn in comments are very overblown and for 99% of the people using these monitors it wont be an issue.
I always feel compelled to post how frickin' amazing your videos are. This monitor is nowhere near my wheelhouse (I'm more large OLED), but I immediately click, watch, and enjoy. Always looking forward to the next one!
4:25 You're wrong on this. The perceived motion blur (which is also the motion blur visible in the images you show) is caused by objects on the screen not moving smoothly but rather teleporting each frame. With our eyes we track that object as if it was moving smoothly and not teleporting. That results in motion blur and the larger the gaps inbetween the teleports, the greater the motion blur becomes. If you get 250 fps the motion blur will be the same no matter if you set your monitor to 500hz or 250hz. The monitor doesn't magically interpolate frames, it just shows the same frame twice so the gap of objects moving between each frame stays the same.
I’ll give it to you. Listening back, I can see how people would take that away. But no, Im not under the impression that a monitor interpolates frames. I get how sample and hold works. Its obvious that when your game CAN output at the same rate as the monitor, motion blur will decrease as frame rates and monitor speeds increase. When your game CAN’T l, but can get close, its still gonna look better in practice. Like MWIII only hits 300-400fps for me on this monitor but it still looks (and feels) a lot better than running it locked at 240 fps at 240hz. I would not recommend anyone look at panel like this if they’re only getting 240 out of their game. Thats a bridge too far.
@@badseedtech I think that the 540 Hz only makes sense in combination with G Sync. Therefore, the Asus monitor is unfortunately the winner for me. Most games don't run at a constant FPS, regardless of the hardware
Awesome and all with strobing too, pricey. But yeah, OLEDs in this Hz class are coming soon. What I'd like to see is that they also start including max Hz BFI too. Extra with BFI sync.
Thanks for the review. BTW you can get 12 bpc on the Asus, setting it from the Nvidia panel (and the monitor recognizes it too on its on control panel afterwards). Color vibrance is also on the Asus, just split colour by colour (going to Color Temp, user mode etc.). ULMB2 is not visually darker than Dyac if you play with contrast, HDR (and ULMB pulse width and offset of course). Response time: OLEDs do compensate that a lot with the processing time which is just not there on TNs and summed up to response time end up being quiet close to TN panels. 1080p is even too much for competitive, vast majority of CS pros still play on 4:3 and with a lower resolution also. For competitive games, these monitors will most likely still be on top of the rest I believe. Zowie makes it easier to set up everything within a few minutes, Asus allows for a much deeper resolution when it comes to settings but allows for the same stuff in the end (at times, calling it different).
This is probably the last of the TN panels. I really think OLED is the future and with burn in warranties of 3 years its only a matter of time before oled is better in every aspect than TN.
@@xFrxstyYou mean a great esports HDR true black OLED monitors even at 1080p? It would be nice even make it for 16 inch esports gaming laptops by cutting 32 inch 4K and 480Hz WOLED panels into four, optimize refresh rate, then done. Ideally it would still have true black HDR certification and HDR10+/Dolby Vision and real HDMI 2.1 FRL ports for console esports gamers, and so it needs OLED at 16:10 WUXGA and 600Hz native refresh rate, and multiple tandem layer OLEDs to minimize burn in for longer longevity :)
Badseed said it right in the vid: 1440p 24" 480hz OLED ...by Benq, is the dream. The last part is there because they have the most functional OSD, the best looking Black Equalizer and built-in Sharpness filter. (both of which are used and abused by every tryhard like me, who has gotten used to them on Benq monitors)
I'm hoping for OLED with good BFI implementation. This should give us the best experience: best response times, best colors, best black levels and reduced persistence. But i think, that LCD will have a niche for some time, as LCD offers the highest refresh rates and backlight strobing combined, which gives the best motion clarity.
@@ioioiotu DyAc 2 lets talk about it, because im so confused, someone says its great technology...but others says it adds input latency, what is best if you play cs2/valorant? having dyac 2 on or off?
@@DeadlyShotGG It ads 1-3 ms latency, at that point the ping is more important, moving closer to the servers. And if you want the absolute lowest you must use some mouse/keyboard with 8000 hz polling and almost sub 1ms latency. Ultimately if motion clarity is better for you or 1-3 lower ms can only be tested by playing and seeing your score with it on and with it off and comparing it. For most pros in valorant because of the pace of the game dyac doesn't make much difference hence many leave it off.
When 360hz 1440p came out. I gave up, never going back to 1080p. I also realized a loss of 10 fps, but the ability to see people is worth more. Also, the fact you can turn graphics on low get the fps back, and it still looks way better. I don't see the point 1080p. Zowie needs a 1440p dyac monitor. They are doing the mouse thing again. Everyone is switching? Well, we will be 3 years late. 😂 it's time for pro events to switch a mid rang card and can run most competitive fps games at 1440p high fps. Csgo isn't hard to run guys get with it
I think Zowie could cut through with a 1440p if they could get a panel that was like 25 inches versus the standard 27. I just like smaller monitors a little more for any game.
the thing is, if you want to be competitive 24/24.5 inches monitors are the bests compared to 27in and 1080p is better than 1440p for competitive even tho you see enemies better on a 1440p
I use OLED and at nothing less than 240 Hz (and as high as possible to 240 fps as I can) but I was obsessed with telling people about strobing monitors when I was using them from around 2013 to 2023 and the CRAZY part is that, in strobing mode, you don't even need 540 Hz or even 240 Hz to get CRT levels of motion clarity. Even at just 120 Hz / 120 fps, the motion clarity of strobing mode (or BFI for OLED) is INSANE! After 120-ish fps / Hz, there are huge diminishing returns for strobing clarity as 120 already gets you to like 90% near-CRT-perfection. Strobing mode monitors need to start being available for large 1440p and 4K 16:9, 21:9, and 32:9 monitors. Even if there's more pixels to push than 1080p, strobing at just 240 Hz / fps, and even just 120, is already like 95-99 % as clear as strobing at 540 Hz / fps but with the benefit of a way bigger, potentially wider (21:9, 32:9), higher resolution, display. What's with the obsession with 24" and 25" 1080p monitors? It's not 2013 anymore.
@@lukaslillestl-brandlistuen7269 Ya but 99.999% of users don't play to break world records and/or to win "professional videogamer" tournaments, they play for fun.
How impossible would a 540hz 1080p OLED be at like 24-27 inches? 1440P is great but not needed for some competitive games because the extra frames and better input delay from fps are worth more than clarity for some. I have a 4k 144hz and a xl2566k but I would love 1080p to get maxed out performance and clarity without the FPS loss.
@@backupjester3520With backlight strobing the lcd would still be clearer, but you would have be extremely good at cs to ever justify this over a 480hz oled.
@@Your_Paramour i just wonder if the colors that offer the oled pannel would get you headache if you play competitive fps for 7-8h x day or it does not...plus if you keep your monitor turned on for 15-16h x day would it ruin the panel pretty fast??
I will say this, I was hyped for the zowie monitor but on Amazon the asus was $840 and I decided to go with that one instead, having the ability to use the g sync module or keep it at 540 with ulmb2 was the dealbreaker for me, I also think having the reflex sensor is great if your looking at using latency mod to test your computer and monitor for the lowest possible latency. I have always had 1080p but going from 240-540 was a massive difference, I don’t think 1440p 540 will be justifiable considering that will be a $2,000 monitor :(
As i keep my monitors for as long as i want ill never buy an oled because of the simple risk of burn in. It is just stressfull for me to always have the risk of burn in even variating in length when it pops up. Gonna stay with my trusty lcds until micro led is applicable in larger screens and not too expensive
These monitors are meant really for the pro scene that going to lans and whatnot. Everything zowie does is for that mind. Even the box has the best unboxing experience of any monitor company by a longshot that can be easily reused to pack you monitor up for carrying if your going to travel. Also you're right on the 24in form factor, it's superior to anything else for anything remotely competitive. I have a PG27AQN and I still find myself going to my XL2546K even with the fact that the asus has a 25in mode. The features on the zowie are better and dyac gets brighter than ulmb2. I'm sure ulmb2 is good but if it's too dark to use then it doesn't matter.
i play halo infinite competitively and am torn between this and the PG248QP - sounds like you know a lot about these monitors would love to hear your thoughts on which would be best for my application
@@supernice_auto The Zowie, no contest. Unless you want higher resolution, the Zowie is better for competition and simple ease of use. The only thing on that Asus monitor that's worth anything is ULMB 2 (you will almost never use GSYNC) but dyac 2 is really good and you will notice no differences. I barely notice any difference between dyac+ and ULMB 2 as it is. At least that Asus model works better than somthing like the PG27AQN and gets bright enough to even use the feature. However when it comes to form, function, ease of use Zowie destroys everything else I have ever used. Simply unbox it, simple stand to put on, doesn't take up any space on the desk and has the puck to save and easily change settings instead of having to reach behind the monitor all the time. Makes it easy to change the monitor settings to something for gaming like having the black equalizer on, dyac 2, etc. and then turn it off back to a stardard setting for regular desktop use. All the settings are better as well, especially the black equalizer which I actively used and found that no other monitor has been able to match it and even has a sharpness setting. I know, for some reason these other monitors don't even have something as simple as that. But I use it and it helps make the TN panel look fairly clear even in games with tons of foliage and such like Tarkov or Battlefield. Essentially if you are looking at a monitor and it's a TN panel and more competative, then look no further than Zowie, full stop. Other brands are only worth looking at if you want higher resolution IPS or OLED options.
i understand that zowie is sticking to what they do best, but as the video says, upcoming oleds at 480hz will blow this thing out of the park. it's really hard to beat the clarity of practically no response time. i'm not even going to go into colors lmao, it's a TN panel..
if you play any other game you are right, but for competitive fps, 24/24.5 inches monitors at 1080p to get the highest fps possible and 540hz is still the best option, maybe in 6-7 years oled will be better, they still need to make 24 inches monitor with oled panels
no point of making this video. casual gamers are not the targeted audience. zowie are always known as the household name and market leader of esports centric monitors. if you want to only play games and be as competitive as possible then this monitor is for you. also about tilting the monitor towards your face, most professional players sit really really close towards their monitor, its doesn't affect. also it is kinda braindead to look at this monitor thinking it will appeal the casuals. brother this monitor is specifically made for the most competitive fps players in mind
Another thing to note, is that without things like gsync. The response time of your monitor and the frames being outputted by your gpu can be on different timings. So you could theoretically, be timed in a way in which you are technically behind 1 frame, as the gpu is slightly slower so it uses the previous frame. Gsync tries to mitigate it and so does amd freesync. Also to maintain a perfect fps is nearly impossible, as it means anything that can lower fps will. In a game like cs your frame rate is not always perfect, In some cases you can drop 5-10 if it’s limited to well within the gpu and cpu ability.
I like good stands on monitors but personally I still ditch them for a sub $50 monitor arm that just does it all. No wasted space and I can place the monitor exactly how I want it.
Heyo, wanted to ask, are there still FHD monitors being made at 24"? I mean to modern specs, OLED, at least over 144hz,... Seems like the industry is moving towards bigger monitors with more resolution, but I really couldn't care less for that. I don't wanna wear glasses at my computer just to be able to tell the difference between a 200 bucks monitor and a 1000 bucks one. The bigger the monitor, the further I'd have to put it, making it even worse. I still want to enjoy the contrast and fluidity of a high refresh-rate OLED tho, but I can't seem to find anything.
@Doctor0Who OLED hater arguments: “enjoy the burn in”. Me an OLED enthusiast with 1 pixel clean and panel refresh and basic maintenance. “What burn in”
We need 1440p Oled 540hz that would honestly give you the biggest competitive advantage or at least 1080p oled 540hz how long y’all think till that type of monitor comes?
I'm confused about the additional input lag from DYAC2. I'm fairly certain that since it doesn't add any post-processing it's not supposed to add any input lag?? Did Zowie lie ab that or what
now will nvidia update all new monitor with gSync module can use together with ulmb... NVIDIA Launch ‘G-sync Pulsar’ Allowing ULMB at the Same Time as Variable Refresh Rates
We need a 540 hz monitors comparaison. We know that the ZOWIE is beaten by the ASUS, but the 540hz monitor from AOC and ACER haven’t been reviewed yet. And the ACER is half the price of the ZOWIE
The fact that you brought up the upcoming 480Hz OLED options as a reason ro not purchase this monitor holds no real relevancy. The upcoming 480Hz OLED monitors will be 1440p at 27 inches so this monitor is still an very viable option for competitive gamers because OLED's still don't address the 1080p market and i dont think they ever will or at least not in the near future because they want to sell those higher resolution OLED's to make higher margins.
I dislike how he shits on the monitor before it even releases. I agree with your statement and imo he should have kept the comparison of TN panel to TN panel. Each Monitor type is in a class of its own. Each having their own advantages and disadvantages. Promoting and OLED when the purpose is supposed to be about this product is annoying... too much opinion. Provide the facts and let us decide .
Personally I own the Asus ROG PG248QP TN 540hz Monitor and i love it. I purposely avoid OLED's because of how dim & barely bright they get and if they do its in a 10% window. Not being able to confidently web browse without the thought of burn-in risk , leaving a static image coming back only to have it burn-in . I watch youtube videos , read alot comments , school work etc & imo OLED is not an well rounded monitor. Even though burn-in is covered , but what happens when the warranty is gone after 3 years. If you randomly get burn-in your product is literally e-waste ... no one will willing buy a burn-in oled so it will be hard to sell.. again... Thats thousounds down the drain , you'll have to just deal with it. It will be something every time you use the monitor you have to be worried about.
coming from OLED, TN does look really bad but most ppl haven't experienced that and once i swapped back to IPS and went to TN, it's not nearly as bad as the initial jump from OLED to TN.
Recently turned DYAC+ off on my 144hz Zowie and started playing better because of less input delay. Anyone else have the same experience? There’s certainly more motion blur, but noticeably less input delay. The motion blur is a non issue, if anything a little annoying when I turn quickly.
8:45 you and me both man, i'm tired of "24-inch" (23.8", 24.1" and 24.5") gaming monitors coming exclusively with 1080p, just imagine a 24" 1440p 480Hz Glossy OLED monitor 😍
@@LouisVBelt competitive players don't use 1440p because actually good 1440p gaming monitors for eSports don't exist yet. Actually good = 23.8", 24.1" & 24.5"
People that are really competitive but don’t have 4090s play lower ingame res for higher fps, but I don’t know why anyone capable of 1920x1080 at 540fps would want the 0.0x millisecond latency increase over a marked clarity increase. 1440 480hz oleds are coming and with a high end gpu, hopefully even into the mid range area with next gen, it’s feasible to drive that while being way better than 1080.
I will insist on QHD even on a 24-24.5" because 1080p is becoming less efficient with OLED and c'mon gaming LCDs, at least for competitive fps or anybody who aims at that, are not going any further from 1/1/25. So OLED and QHD have to show up together. I would not chose a 27" or plus display because when you aim to become a pro or anyway to play at highest ranks/levels in CS, Val and OW 27" starts to become too big, at least for me. And active pros ain't switching to 27" guys trust me they aren't. About 500hz? Not marketing! At least, not at all! Of course brands build marketing over these monitors but they have to, it's their job and for their earnings! 😂 But technically with OLEDs, 500hz gaming experience can be feelable and an advantage over 360hz. EDIT: unpopular opinion → viewing angles are totally useless! As long as newer monitors are more and more adjustable in 5 axes (and desks too) you should be able to play straight which is something that someone that buys these monitors should have to do! Since you spend around 1k to play at super-high-refresh what the heck do you need wider viewing angles for?! 😂 If these monitors have them better and better than that's ok but even if they don't who gives a f?
If you really want an excellent gaming monitor go for one of the 4k/1080p 480hz oled monitors. Those are gonna be much more versatile at a similar price when they go on sale.
Man I don’t care if the little UFO man looks the exact same stopped as traveling at 7523 lightyears a second, I’m still not buying a $900 TN 1080p panel. 240-360hz is good enough on OLED and the other benefits you get put the nail in the coffin. A 25” OLED would be nice though for true competitive gaming.
@@daviddave8761 what i'm trying to say is, from the looks of it, badseed only used the monitor via a displayport 1.4 cable, instead of also comparing that to using an hdmi 2.1 cable, where it might be possible to run the monitor without dsc(!); that's what i am curious about, would be good to have a confirmation on whether that's possible or not, as it is not clearly stated in the video nor anywhere else yet
This monitor is for 0.1% of people who play competitive games, just like the 66k the target audience isn’t your average gamer and it was never meant to be. If you’re not a really high ranked player you’re wasting your money and time but if you are then why not. This model in particular is overpriced tho.
The zowie monitors have pretty bad clouding / haze on top of looking washed out and yellow too. They have low quality control these days. On top of that, a lot of their TN panels are outputting different color and brightness slightly, so sometimes their monitors aren't even made equal.
@Doctor0Who I’ve always chosen Zowie monitors because I trust their commitment to quality. They never rush their products to market. When 360Hz monitors were released, many people switched back to 240Hz because the technology felt rushed and didn’t offer a substantial improvement. Zowie took their time to perfect their version. Now, a year after 540Hz displays have been around, Zowie is releasing their own 540Hz monitor. I believe Zowie crafts their monitors specifically for FPS games, focusing on perfection
i hve 4090 nd using alienware 27inch 2k at 280hz. playing at 280 is cool exp. wondering how it would be at 540. i am also a developer and works on split screens alot, unsure if i can work on 24inch monitor. although 24 r best if only playing cs2. i can afford 540 but wondering if i should wait for other good options. 280 -360 is more then enough imo
I want a honest opinion I have a alienware 360hz but have the hardware for 540hz don't know which one will work for my favorite games like valorant and cs2 and cod
Most people can't even tell the difference between 360hz and 540hz, and even 240hz to 540hz, it's not obvious. Once you hit 360hz anything higher has no benifit.
Us apex players can't even consider high hz monitors like this cause the game is hard capped at 300fps :/ Not saying i would get this monitor in particular, but super high hz is something i wanna look into, i just can't right now
If it was 1440p it would have been great. and TN is still the best. In my opinion anyway. I tried IPS and OLED screens but after 20-30 mins my eyes started hurting. So i bought a HP omen X 27 monitor 1440p 240Hz and it is so damn good
All those years of developing ULMB and DYAC and is now obsolete to OLED. Zowie's monitor market share will drop if they keep producing TN panel monitors and not switching over to oled and thinking of another black magic that will make it even faster (which is literally impossible because of oled's near 0 instantaneous responce times) OR try catering to gamers by adding those classic Zowie flaps and introducing quality of life improvements on them new oled monitors. Welcome to the future, after the release of the 480hz 1440p oled monitor Q4 2024, the only winner in the monitor space will be the company that can have the highest nits of brightness, but as far as I know it's a standstill so competetition will be crazy. Welcome to the golden era of monitors where the only way monitor manufactering companies will keep market share by dropping prices. Which is already evident in the 360hz oled 1440p monitors that you can buy for as little as $900 (with the release of the 480hz the drop in pricing will make 240hz oled monitors even more affordable at prices ranging from $450-$550.
i go by the mantra of cmi cant make it i or most player is not good enough to translate the advantage to pure performance so its a just an expensive normal monitor
I got an XL2566K I play FPS mainly I am not very impressed with the colour of the monitor it looks really washed and inconsistent on shading. For response time great, for visuals it’s not the best. Sometimes different players in COD can be hard to see with its shadows. For CS it’s alright and good enough to play on, for valorant it’s where I rather have an 1440p 240hz or an OLED
Around minute 7 you start saying that higher frame rates make it so that motion blur is not a factor anymore. This is not backed up properly in your arguments, it kills your credibility.
Unless you only play games that can reach 500+fps consistently with the hardware you have and you play at the highest level where going up to that refresh rate would remotely help you perform better. If this isn't you, then no.
People need to understand this monitor is targeting competitive tactical FPS players like CS2 and Valorant. There are over 1 million players playing CS2 everyday and among them a lot are willing to lower their resolution just to get higher FPS and those are their potential target customers. If you are looking for monitor with better graphics that means you are out of the loop.
THANKYOU !!! Finally someone telling the truth about this product and its market. I really dislike how he downplays and gives a bad review about this monitor before it even releases.
If you are unable to enjoy the graphics in the game just to get more fps then I am sure that you don’t enjoy the cheese in the Pizza either ;)
underrated comment
@@user-vn8dc7rn1z it's a highly competitive game, it's not about being "unable to enjoy the graphics", it's about playing in the best optimal condition
@@smLCSGO I don’t think casual players will enjoy it without good graphics. It’s competitive for some and fun for the most :)
"Fast, but won't last"
Damn, Zowie attacking me on a personal level
With OLED taking over in the high refresh space just makes it so hard to consider monitors like this
All GPUs at over market price range.
Especially for that price.
This wont burn in though
@@Lunaq from what I've seen I don't think burn in is something really to worry about in normal use
@@UpgradeLemonade Yeah its mostly people who don't own oleds that say this. I've been using an LG C2 since release on my desk for productivity and games with 0 burn in. I literally leave the screen on with static windows taskbar, wallpaper and shortcuts along with all my 3d programs for hours at a time on purpose to see if i can fuck with the screen. So far with the OLED care and pixel cleaning it's been a non issue. I think the burn in comments are very overblown and for 99% of the people using these monitors it wont be an issue.
I always feel compelled to post how frickin' amazing your videos are. This monitor is nowhere near my wheelhouse (I'm more large OLED), but I immediately click, watch, and enjoy. Always looking forward to the next one!
Thanks so much!
That intro was fairly glorious!
Keep up the good stuff.
Im also a 24 inch enjoyer. 1440p 24 inch oled would be so good
Bro saying hdr is ass on a tn panel is a fact but the way he said it caught me off guard and made me laugh I can’t even lie
I was a user of the xl2566k for awhile. Don't play FPS much anymore and pretty much play openworld games. So I went with the Asus PG27AQDM
Solid choice
4:25 You're wrong on this. The perceived motion blur (which is also the motion blur visible in the images you show) is caused by objects on the screen not moving smoothly but rather teleporting each frame. With our eyes we track that object as if it was moving smoothly and not teleporting. That results in motion blur and the larger the gaps inbetween the teleports, the greater the motion blur becomes. If you get 250 fps the motion blur will be the same no matter if you set your monitor to 500hz or 250hz. The monitor doesn't magically interpolate frames, it just shows the same frame twice so the gap of objects moving between each frame stays the same.
thankyou , i am glad people are calling him out on bs
thats the refresh rate of the monitor not the frame rate of the ufo video
I’ll give it to you. Listening back, I can see how people would take that away. But no, Im not under the impression that a monitor interpolates frames. I get how sample and hold works.
Its obvious that when your game CAN output at the same rate as the monitor, motion blur will decrease as frame rates and monitor speeds increase.
When your game CAN’T l, but can get close, its still gonna look better in practice. Like MWIII only hits 300-400fps for me on this monitor but it still looks (and feels) a lot better than running it locked at 240 fps at 240hz.
I would not recommend anyone look at panel like this if they’re only getting 240 out of their game. Thats a bridge too far.
@@badseedtech I think that the 540 Hz only makes sense in combination with G Sync.
Therefore, the Asus monitor is unfortunately the winner for me.
Most games don't run at a constant FPS, regardless of the hardware
Awesome and all with strobing too, pricey. But yeah, OLEDs in this Hz class are coming soon. What I'd like to see is that they also start including max Hz BFI too. Extra with BFI sync.
Thanks for the review.
BTW you can get 12 bpc on the Asus, setting it from the Nvidia panel (and the monitor recognizes it too on its on control panel afterwards).
Color vibrance is also on the Asus, just split colour by colour (going to Color Temp, user mode etc.).
ULMB2 is not visually darker than Dyac if you play with contrast, HDR (and ULMB pulse width and offset of course).
Response time: OLEDs do compensate that a lot with the processing time which is just not there on TNs and summed up to response time end up being quiet close to TN panels.
1080p is even too much for competitive, vast majority of CS pros still play on 4:3 and with a lower resolution also.
For competitive games, these monitors will most likely still be on top of the rest I believe. Zowie makes it easier to set up everything within a few minutes, Asus allows for a much deeper resolution when it comes to settings but allows for the same stuff in the end (at times, calling it different).
This is probably the last of the TN panels. I really think OLED is the future and with burn in warranties of 3 years its only a matter of time before oled is better in every aspect than TN.
They practically are in 99% of every application. TN’s don’t even have faster speed. OLED are 0.1
All they have right now is good strobing.
we need 24.5 inch oled monitors, hopefully they are in development
OLED monitor is still not available in my homeland...
Nah I think will still have to wait 2-3 years before they make a 24 inch oled
@@xFrxstyYou mean a great esports HDR true black OLED monitors even at 1080p? It would be nice even make it for 16 inch esports gaming laptops by cutting 32 inch 4K and 480Hz WOLED panels into four, optimize refresh rate, then done. Ideally it would still have true black HDR certification and HDR10+/Dolby Vision and real HDMI 2.1 FRL ports for console esports gamers, and so it needs OLED at 16:10 WUXGA and 600Hz native refresh rate, and multiple tandem layer OLEDs to minimize burn in for longer longevity :)
The only reason I'd still consider a Zowie is for its size. If there ever was a 24" OLED it would be end game.
Badseed said it right in the vid:
1440p 24" 480hz OLED ...by Benq, is the dream.
The last part is there because they have the most functional OSD, the best looking Black Equalizer and built-in Sharpness filter. (both of which are used and abused by every tryhard like me, who has gotten used to them on Benq monitors)
damn super informative! perfect full analysis
I'm hoping for OLED with good BFI implementation. This should give us the best experience: best response times, best colors, best black levels and reduced persistence. But i think, that LCD will have a niche for some time, as LCD offers the highest refresh rates and backlight strobing combined, which gives the best motion clarity.
The 480Hz OLEDS out right now actually have better image clarity not accounting for sample and hold motion blur. It’s over for TN’s and anything else.
@SilverJoystix LG 4k 240/480mode
@Savita 480hz at 1080p
So without dyac they do not have better image clarity.
@@ioioiotu DyAc 2 lets talk about it, because im so confused, someone says its great technology...but others says it adds input latency, what is best if you play cs2/valorant? having dyac 2 on or off?
@@DeadlyShotGG It ads 1-3 ms latency, at that point the ping is more important, moving closer to the servers. And if you want the absolute lowest you must use some mouse/keyboard with 8000 hz polling and almost sub 1ms latency. Ultimately if motion clarity is better for you or 1-3 lower ms can only be tested by playing and seeing your score with it on and with it off and comparing it. For most pros in valorant because of the pace of the game dyac doesn't make much difference hence many leave it off.
When 360hz 1440p came out. I gave up, never going back to 1080p. I also realized a loss of 10 fps, but the ability to see people is worth more. Also, the fact you can turn graphics on low get the fps back, and it still looks way better. I don't see the point 1080p. Zowie needs a 1440p dyac monitor. They are doing the mouse thing again. Everyone is switching? Well, we will be 3 years late. 😂 it's time for pro events to switch a mid rang card and can run most competitive fps games at 1440p high fps. Csgo isn't hard to run guys get with it
I think Zowie could cut through with a 1440p if they could get a panel that was like 25 inches versus the standard 27. I just like smaller monitors a little more for any game.
Nah w cs2 the fps isn’t great even w the best cpu and gpu you can barely get 500 stable
the thing is, if you want to be competitive 24/24.5 inches monitors are the bests compared to 27in and 1080p is better than 1440p for competitive even tho you see enemies better on a 1440p
Bro cs2 is horribly optimized rn. You won't get 360fps consistently with 1440p. csgo would be a totally different thing but it doesn't exist anymore.
There is something Zowie has up their sleeve that none of the OLED’s will…. FLAPS BABY!
I use OLED and at nothing less than 240 Hz (and as high as possible to 240 fps as I can) but I was obsessed with telling people about strobing monitors when I was using them from around 2013 to 2023 and the CRAZY part is that, in strobing mode, you don't even need 540 Hz or even 240 Hz to get CRT levels of motion clarity. Even at just 120 Hz / 120 fps, the motion clarity of strobing mode (or BFI for OLED) is INSANE! After 120-ish fps / Hz, there are huge diminishing returns for strobing clarity as 120 already gets you to like 90% near-CRT-perfection.
Strobing mode monitors need to start being available for large 1440p and 4K 16:9, 21:9, and 32:9 monitors. Even if there's more pixels to push than 1080p, strobing at just 240 Hz / fps, and even just 120, is already like 95-99 % as clear as strobing at 540 Hz / fps but with the benefit of a way bigger, potentially wider (21:9, 32:9), higher resolution, display. What's with the obsession with 24" and 25" 1080p monitors? It's not 2013 anymore.
Lame? You think they make 24" for no reason? 😂
@@vladimir4526 24" sucks. It was nice in 2012.
@@Spinelli__ Bro 24/25 is the best for competitive shooters. Anything bigger just makes it harder to aim in games like valorant, csgo, overwatch.
@@lukaslillestl-brandlistuen7269 Ya but 99.999% of users don't play to break world records and/or to win "professional videogamer" tournaments, they play for fun.
@@Spinelli__ then buy something else.
How impossible would a 540hz 1080p OLED be at like 24-27 inches? 1440P is great but not needed for some competitive games because the extra frames and better input delay from fps are worth more than clarity for some. I have a 4k 144hz and a xl2566k but I would love 1080p to get maxed out performance and clarity without the FPS loss.
they taking it too far with these esports monitors, an oled panel for gaming would probably beat any tn panel if it can match 500 hz
A 27" 1440p monitor will be a bit over 1080p if you limit it to a 24" window so probably not much reason for a 1080p 24" oled to exist.
@@backupjester3520With backlight strobing the lcd would still be clearer, but you would have be extremely good at cs to ever justify this over a 480hz oled.
@@Your_Paramour i just wonder if the colors that offer the oled pannel would get you headache if you play competitive fps for 7-8h x day or it does not...plus if you keep your monitor turned on for 15-16h x day would it ruin the panel pretty fast??
@@Your_Paramourwhy will you make 27" for limit 24" when you can make 24" 😂 no reason is for competitive 27" oled
I will say this, I was hyped for the zowie monitor but on Amazon the asus was $840 and I decided to go with that one instead, having the ability to use the g sync module or keep it at 540 with ulmb2 was the dealbreaker for me, I also think having the reflex sensor is great if your looking at using latency mod to test your computer and monitor for the lowest possible latency. I have always had 1080p but going from 240-540 was a massive difference, I don’t think 1440p 540 will be justifiable considering that will be a $2,000 monitor :(
As i keep my monitors for as long as i want ill never buy an oled because of the simple risk of burn in.
It is just stressfull for me to always have the risk of burn in even variating in length when it pops up.
Gonna stay with my trusty lcds until micro led is applicable in larger screens and not too expensive
This dude is coming for that monitor reviewing crown. This seems like a great monitor for shooters. Not for me, but it has its place in the market.
Yo Bad Seed! What’s up dude! Great review as always. I’m testing this monitor right now and am loving it. Experiencing similar things.
love u zorz
NO , You already have an OLED & The 500hz SLOW Alienware monitor. I am a fan of your channel ... enough is enough
@@HumbleDude46995 LOL!
@@monolith757 Love you back.
These monitors are meant really for the pro scene that going to lans and whatnot. Everything zowie does is for that mind. Even the box has the best unboxing experience of any monitor company by a longshot that can be easily reused to pack you monitor up for carrying if your going to travel. Also you're right on the 24in form factor, it's superior to anything else for anything remotely competitive. I have a PG27AQN and I still find myself going to my XL2546K even with the fact that the asus has a 25in mode. The features on the zowie are better and dyac gets brighter than ulmb2. I'm sure ulmb2 is good but if it's too dark to use then it doesn't matter.
i play halo infinite competitively and am torn between this and the PG248QP - sounds like you know a lot about these monitors would love to hear your thoughts on which would be best for my application
@@supernice_auto The Zowie, no contest. Unless you want higher resolution, the Zowie is better for competition and simple ease of use. The only thing on that Asus monitor that's worth anything is ULMB 2 (you will almost never use GSYNC) but dyac 2 is really good and you will notice no differences. I barely notice any difference between dyac+ and ULMB 2 as it is. At least that Asus model works better than somthing like the PG27AQN and gets bright enough to even use the feature.
However when it comes to form, function, ease of use Zowie destroys everything else I have ever used. Simply unbox it, simple stand to put on, doesn't take up any space on the desk and has the puck to save and easily change settings instead of having to reach behind the monitor all the time. Makes it easy to change the monitor settings to something for gaming like having the black equalizer on, dyac 2, etc. and then turn it off back to a stardard setting for regular desktop use. All the settings are better as well, especially the black equalizer which I actively used and found that no other monitor has been able to match it and even has a sharpness setting. I know, for some reason these other monitors don't even have something as simple as that. But I use it and it helps make the TN panel look fairly clear even in games with tons of foliage and such like Tarkov or Battlefield.
Essentially if you are looking at a monitor and it's a TN panel and more competative, then look no further than Zowie, full stop. Other brands are only worth looking at if you want higher resolution IPS or OLED options.
i understand that zowie is sticking to what they do best, but as the video says, upcoming oleds at 480hz will blow this thing out of the park. it's really hard to beat the clarity of practically no response time. i'm not even going to go into colors lmao, it's a TN panel..
Irrelevant because OLEDs are still sample and hold, and without dyac they can't blow tn dyac out of the water.
if you play any other game you are right, but for competitive fps, 24/24.5 inches monitors at 1080p to get the highest fps possible and 540hz is still the best option, maybe in 6-7 years oled will be better, they still need to make 24 inches monitor with oled panels
no point of making this video. casual gamers are not the targeted audience. zowie are always known as the household name and market leader of esports centric monitors. if you want to only play games and be as competitive as possible then this monitor is for you. also about tilting the monitor towards your face, most professional players sit really really close towards their monitor, its doesn't affect. also it is kinda braindead to look at this monitor thinking it will appeal the casuals. brother this monitor is specifically made for the most competitive fps players in mind
Finally some sense
Another thing to note, is that without things like gsync. The response time of your monitor and the frames being outputted by your gpu can be on different timings. So you could theoretically, be timed in a way in which you are technically behind 1 frame, as the gpu is slightly slower so it uses the previous frame. Gsync tries to mitigate it and so does amd freesync. Also to maintain a perfect fps is nearly impossible, as it means anything that can lower fps will. In a game like cs your frame rate is not always perfect, In some cases you can drop 5-10 if it’s limited to well within the gpu and cpu ability.
I like good stands on monitors but personally I still ditch them for a sub $50 monitor arm that just does it all. No wasted space and I can place the monitor exactly how I want it.
Thanks for posting this video.
They NEED to move over to 1440p.
I wish fr. They would have given is something interesting to talk about at least. This is basically doa by the time your preorder shows up
They will not move to 1440p because the target audience still mainly plays at 4:3 1280x960 stretched😂
They won't, they cater specifically to the pro scene. 25in monitors are superior in any competitive game and 1080 works fine for them.
they dont know what theyre missing on, and i agree with the size for them, so 24-25 inch 1440p.@@saint_snow
Agreed. I would buy a 1440 in a heartbeat.@@badseedtech
Heyo, wanted to ask, are there still FHD monitors being made at 24"? I mean to modern specs, OLED, at least over 144hz,... Seems like the industry is moving towards bigger monitors with more resolution, but I really couldn't care less for that. I don't wanna wear glasses at my computer just to be able to tell the difference between a 200 bucks monitor and a 1000 bucks one. The bigger the monitor, the further I'd have to put it, making it even worse. I still want to enjoy the contrast and fluidity of a high refresh-rate OLED tho, but I can't seem to find anything.
very helpful. thank you sir!
I made my decision about 1-2 years ago already. Not buying a monitor until i can get 27in 1440p OLED 480hz+
That’s the ASUS PG27AQDP coming in 3+ or so months.
@Doctor0Who OLED hater arguments: “enjoy the burn in”.
Me an OLED enthusiast with 1 pixel clean and panel refresh and basic maintenance.
“What burn in”
We need 1440p Oled 540hz that would honestly give you the biggest competitive advantage or at least 1080p oled 540hz how long y’all think till that type of monitor comes?
There is no point going to higher Rez like 1440p with super high refresh rate of 540hz yet since graphic card that handle these don't exist yet.
@@zazuu854 on games like valorant super high end pcs are definitely able to do 1440p at 540 fps
I just can’t with 2k res and 27 inches. Currently in 390hz 1080p 24 inch and waiting for a 24inchboled
I cannot wait for your review of the ROG AQDP
Holy Shit That beard is glorious.
I'm confused about the additional input lag from DYAC2. I'm fairly certain that since it doesn't add any post-processing it's not supposed to add any input lag?? Did Zowie lie ab that or what
I've done a bit of research into this as I own the Asus 360hz IPS with ULMB2 and from what I've gathered ULMB adds no input lag.
@@ThisIsNotJP interesting. and the tech all works similarly so i'm assuming thats applicable to me too since i have the xl2456x
Why use HMDI 2.1. but make it impossible do disable DSC?
you are black right?! just buy it and talk about how cool the monitor looks . You shouldnt be concerned or trying to understand anything else
@@HumbleDude46995if I wanna buy a monitor for looks I would but a oled.
Wish more would push for 24inch 1440p
now will nvidia update all new monitor with gSync module can use together with ulmb... NVIDIA Launch ‘G-sync Pulsar’ Allowing ULMB at the Same Time as Variable Refresh Rates
We need a 540 hz monitors comparaison. We know that the ZOWIE is beaten by the ASUS, but the 540hz monitor from AOC and ACER haven’t been reviewed yet. And the ACER is half the price of the ZOWIE
Nice vid mate
The fact that you brought up the upcoming 480Hz OLED options as a reason ro not purchase this monitor holds no real relevancy. The upcoming 480Hz OLED monitors will be 1440p at 27 inches so this monitor is still an very viable option for competitive gamers because OLED's still don't address the 1080p market and i dont think they ever will or at least not in the near future because they want to sell those higher resolution OLED's to make higher margins.
There’s literally a 1080p 480hz oled out right now. This monitor is completely shit value.
@@littlebear4543 There is no 1080p 480Hz OLED's on the market right now. You do not know what your talking about.
also you need far more powerful gpu to use 1440p and gpu load will be higher
I dislike how he shits on the monitor before it even releases. I agree with your statement and imo he should have kept the comparison of TN panel to TN panel. Each Monitor type is in a class of its own. Each having their own advantages and disadvantages. Promoting and OLED when the purpose is supposed to be about this product is annoying... too much opinion. Provide the facts and let us decide .
Personally I own the Asus ROG PG248QP TN 540hz Monitor and i love it. I purposely avoid OLED's because of how dim & barely bright they get and if they do its in a 10% window. Not being able to confidently web browse without the thought of burn-in risk , leaving a static image coming back only to have it burn-in . I watch youtube videos , read alot comments , school work etc & imo OLED is not an well rounded monitor. Even though burn-in is covered , but what happens when the warranty is gone after 3 years. If you randomly get burn-in your product is literally e-waste ... no one will willing buy a burn-in oled so it will be hard to sell.. again... Thats thousounds down the drain , you'll have to just deal with it. It will be something every time you use the monitor you have to be worried about.
Would love comparison to xl2566k someday!
coming from OLED, TN does look really bad but most ppl haven't experienced that and once i swapped back to IPS and went to TN, it's not nearly as bad as the initial jump from OLED to TN.
Recently turned DYAC+ off on my 144hz Zowie and started playing better because of less input delay. Anyone else have the same experience? There’s certainly more motion blur, but noticeably less input delay. The motion blur is a non issue, if anything a little annoying when I turn quickly.
the way you said "HDR is ass on a TN panel" made me laugh so hard
8:45 you and me both man, i'm tired of "24-inch" (23.8", 24.1" and 24.5") gaming monitors coming exclusively with 1080p, just imagine a 24" 1440p 480Hz Glossy OLED monitor 😍
competitive players will never use something above 1080p and the 480hz simply doesn’t go with 1440p, at least for now, so kinda weird but ok
@@LouisVBelt competitive players don't use 1440p because actually good 1440p gaming monitors for eSports don't exist yet. Actually good = 23.8", 24.1" & 24.5"
@@shanksisnoteventhatstrongbruh yeah sure, it has nothing do with the ingame res being lower to get more fps
People that are really competitive but don’t have 4090s play lower ingame res for higher fps, but I don’t know why anyone capable of 1920x1080 at 540fps would want the 0.0x millisecond latency increase over a marked clarity increase. 1440 480hz oleds are coming and with a high end gpu, hopefully even into the mid range area with next gen, it’s feasible to drive that while being way better than 1080.
@@__Ognamat 24", 1 FPS is better than clarity increase from 1080p to 1440p. See 4 pixels instead of 3 is irrelevant compared to see faster.
Perfect monitor for pro gamers for high fps titles doesn't exist… yet!
We should wait 1-2 years until a QHD 24.5" OLED 500hz comes out.
I will insist on QHD even on a 24-24.5" because 1080p is becoming less efficient with OLED and c'mon gaming LCDs, at least for competitive fps or anybody who aims at that, are not going any further from 1/1/25.
So OLED and QHD have to show up together.
I would not chose a 27" or plus display because when you aim to become a pro or anyway to play at highest ranks/levels in CS, Val and OW 27" starts to become too big, at least for me. And active pros ain't switching to 27" guys trust me they aren't.
About 500hz? Not marketing! At least, not at all! Of course brands build marketing over these monitors but they have to, it's their job and for their earnings! 😂
But technically with OLEDs, 500hz gaming experience can be feelable and an advantage over 360hz.
EDIT: unpopular opinion → viewing angles are totally useless! As long as newer monitors are more and more adjustable in 5 axes (and desks too) you should be able to play straight which is something that someone that buys these monitors should have to do! Since you spend around 1k to play at super-high-refresh what the heck do you need wider viewing angles for?! 😂
If these monitors have them better and better than that's ok but even if they don't who gives a f?
Interested in the monitor and would like to upgrade from my 360Hz Zowie monitor, but the price for this is jaw-dropping.
If you really want an excellent gaming monitor go for one of the 4k/1080p 480hz oled monitors. Those are gonna be much more versatile at a similar price when they go on sale.
Man I don’t care if the little UFO man looks the exact same stopped as traveling at 7523 lightyears a second, I’m still not buying a $900 TN 1080p panel. 240-360hz is good enough on OLED and the other benefits you get put the nail in the coffin. A 25” OLED would be nice though for true competitive gaming.
i hope for the future a 24'' or 25'' OLED
Actual laughed out loud at that first sentence. You’re definitely not wrong.
Any plans for reviews on cheaper ultra light weight mice? I've seen
I just got mine today. DSC can be disabled by changing the EDID settings from 540hz to 500hz.
Asus or Zowie? And you can see difference in quality image with DSC OFF ??
how you know that dsc is off? Where you see for confirm.
Zowie should offer options. I'd rather save $300 - $400 and get panel without Dyac, S-switch and the wings. Like the xl2540k
shouldn't hdmi 2.1 be capable of no dsc at 540hz? maybe test this and compare input lag etc., am curious
U cannot disable dsc on zowie
@@daviddave8761 are you sure? even when using hdmi 2.1?
01:19 @@Ulexos
@@daviddave8761 what i'm trying to say is, from the looks of it, badseed only used the monitor via a displayport 1.4 cable, instead of also comparing that to using an hdmi 2.1 cable, where it might be possible to run the monitor without dsc(!); that's what i am curious about, would be good to have a confirmation on whether that's possible or not, as it is not clearly stated in the video nor anywhere else yet
@@Ulexoswhy would he not use the hdmi 2.1?
ASUS 540HZ OR ZOWIE 540HZ i care most about input delay and faster response time?
i waiting for a 24'' 240hz 1080p OLED monitor. zowie make it happend pls!
Me too, but not from zowie otherwise will be overpriced.
My 480hz OLED comes next week 😂
How is it
When you say that 480hz oled is coming, which specific monitors are you talking about? Do you have videos on them already?
Asus Pg27aqdp release date Q4 of this year
This monitor is for 0.1% of people who play competitive games, just like the 66k the target audience isn’t your average gamer and it was never meant to be. If you’re not a really high ranked player you’re wasting your money and time but if you are then why not. This model in particular is overpriced tho.
There are new switches for the wooting from geteron!
Can you please try them out🙏. They are called the gateron jade switches
DyAc 2 adding latency is odd, it didn’t before on the XL2566K right? I mean it’s 1ms but it’s weird.
Since the start of dyac it added latency
@@Free5188 I went back and looked at the older monitors, you’re right. It’s just not much, even getting a little better now.
@@nyororomeowelas1225 i don't get it someone recommend to use DyAc 2 others say it adds input latency...that's confusing
backlight strobing which is something important. thats why I cant use an oled.
The zowie monitors have pretty bad clouding / haze on top of looking washed out and yellow too. They have low quality control these days. On top of that, a lot of their TN panels are outputting different color and brightness slightly, so sometimes their monitors aren't even made equal.
Zowie it is. Kinda building a zowie wall with all these monitors haha
@Doctor0Who I’ve always chosen Zowie monitors because I trust their commitment to quality. They never rush their products to market. When 360Hz monitors were released, many people switched back to 240Hz because the technology felt rushed and didn’t offer a substantial improvement. Zowie took their time to perfect their version. Now, a year after 540Hz displays have been around, Zowie is releasing their own 540Hz monitor. I believe Zowie crafts their monitors specifically for FPS games, focusing on perfection
i hve 4090 nd using alienware 27inch 2k at 280hz.
playing at 280 is cool exp. wondering how it would be at 540.
i am also a developer and works on split screens alot, unsure if i can work on 24inch monitor. although 24 r best if only playing cs2.
i can afford 540 but wondering if i should wait for other good options.
280 -360 is more then enough imo
Interesting monitor but that's a no for me with that panel.
Is no one going to mention how you baited the fuck out of your teammate in that first clip and let him die while you went for the knife? lmao
LMAOOO the camo grind is filthy
@@badseedtech I remember suffering through that on MWII, never again
4:17 I don't think that graphic is correct because the PG27AQN never has 18,4% Overshoot.
In Germany Asus 540hz is 880 euros. Zowie 540hz, same panel, 1200 euros.
are you playing with motion blur on in the cod settings?
480hz 24 inch gsync pulsar oled real?
I want a honest opinion I have a alienware 360hz but have the hardware for 540hz don't know which one will work for my favorite games like valorant and cs2 and cod
Came for the hertz
Stayed for that epic beard
Better than zowie xl2566 classic cs monitor?
will the 480Hz OLEDS it is going to have ULMB2 ?
I can imagine some fps LAN tournament kitting out on this stuff, but these monitors don't belong in my home.
Most people can't even tell the difference between 360hz and 540hz, and even 240hz to 540hz, it's not obvious. Once you hit 360hz anything higher has no benifit.
Ok so this or pg248qp
Us apex players can't even consider high hz monitors like this cause the game is hard capped at 300fps :/ Not saying i would get this monitor in particular, but super high hz is something i wanna look into, i just can't right now
If it was 1440p it would have been great. and TN is still the best. In my opinion anyway. I tried IPS and OLED screens but after 20-30 mins my eyes started hurting. So i bought a HP omen X 27 monitor 1440p 240Hz and it is so damn good
with Oled doing 480Hz this does no make much sense , he is right this will not last long .
Oled doing 480hz at 24"? Except that will take 2-3 years to see
All those years of developing ULMB and DYAC and is now obsolete to OLED. Zowie's monitor market share will drop if they keep producing TN panel monitors and not switching over to oled and thinking of another black magic that will make it even faster (which is literally impossible because of oled's near 0 instantaneous responce times) OR try catering to gamers by adding those classic Zowie flaps and introducing quality of life improvements on them new oled monitors. Welcome to the future, after the release of the 480hz 1440p oled monitor Q4 2024, the only winner in the monitor space will be the company that can have the highest nits of brightness, but as far as I know it's a standstill so competetition will be crazy. Welcome to the golden era of monitors where the only way monitor manufactering companies will keep market share by dropping prices. Which is already evident in the 360hz oled 1440p monitors that you can buy for as little as $900 (with the release of the 480hz the drop in pricing will make 240hz oled monitors even more affordable at prices ranging from $450-$550.
good cut on the beard
Considering 4k 240hz oled or 2k 480hz oled or this monitor..
How long is worth waiting for a 1440p 540hz monitor
Hitting 540fps in 1440p is completely unreasonable for every game except like counter strike and valorant
i go by the mantra of cmi
cant make it i or most player is not good enough to translate the advantage to pure performance so its a just an expensive normal monitor
I think what Badseed is trying to say is "just get an oled bro especially at this price point". lol
Damn that is one expensive placebo. I'll stick with my sugar pills i mean Gamer Supps
I got an XL2566K I play FPS mainly I am not very impressed with the colour of the monitor it looks really washed and inconsistent on shading. For response time great, for visuals it’s not the best. Sometimes different players in COD can be hard to see with its shadows. For CS it’s alright and good enough to play on, for valorant it’s where I rather have an 1440p 240hz or an OLED
Around minute 7 you start saying that higher frame rates make it so that motion blur is not a factor anymore. This is not backed up properly in your arguments, it kills your credibility.
HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.4 ???
Sounds like dyac2 is dyac+ without sync. I did not believe this in the past reviews of 540hz benq. What a joke. Thanks on doubling down on that.
I have the Zowie 360HZ I am tempted by this monitor in the future I will have it worse before I need my PC to achieve 500fps it is too much XD
I'd gladly pay up to 3.000$ for a Zowie 25.5" 1440p 240hz GLOSSY W-OLED monitor with 350 nits of brightness.
Its all speed, nothing else. Compromise everything but speed! Just speed and motion clarity. Fuck eye candy.
I second 1440p 24inch 360hz+ monitors
i own the 2566k, is it worth to upgrade to the new zowie?
Unless you only play games that can reach 500+fps consistently with the hardware you have and you play at the highest level where going up to that refresh rate would remotely help you perform better. If this isn't you, then no.