I have the 2017 1.6. I don’t agree it’s gasping. It’s not overly quick but it never ever gives less than 50 mpg. A delight to drive and the Range Rover copy bonnet looks great. Very happy with my Vitara.
I've just sold a 2014 Swift, owned from new, and zero problems. The revised Vitara looks great and your review was fair and informative. The turbo (2wd) is the best choice. My only criticism of Suzuki is the six month service intervals.
I have the vitara allgrip .when you do a road test do it probably .the allgrip has a sport mode it make a lot of difference it’s a lot faster and gives the car great handling.
Great car, Purchasing one for my mum soon. I have a Jimny and I've stuck with Suzuki's for years. I have alot of experience with Vitara's and they have come a long way since the 90s, They aren't exactly a fully fledged 4x4 anymore but they are actually really capable off-road, I've seen the allgrips show up modern 4x4 utes in the slippery stuff because it's just so light and nimble. One key thing I think is missing in this is that the allgrid is more than just the 4x4 system, It also has that massive panoramic sun-roof, This is the only spec that receives this. So for an extra 4-5k you get one of the largest sun-roofs you can get in any car and you get a real 4wd system, Along with better resale value.
I personally think that this is a great little car. I have a 2017 1.4 Turbo. It's lightweight and efficient achieving close to 20 km/p/ltr on a freeway run even with aircon. I got 23 once but don't know how. The DCT is positive although a little twitchy in traffic but it actually gives you a good feel unlike a standard torque converter. Just don't 'creep' in traffic, that's the golden rule. The paddle shifters are handy for those 60 downhill runs where the police are waiting at the bottom with their devices at hand. The Atlantic Turquoise isn't for everyone but I like it and it's easy to find in a car park. Why are the reviewers complaining about the plastics? All cars are basically the same. The seats are very comfy, the back seats are roomy and the entertainment system is simple. Adjusting the volume via the steering wheel is so handy as is changing modes, Apple CarPlay, FM, AM, flash drive etc. Highway driving is extremely efficient, either choose the Cruise Control or the speed limiter, set and forget. The only little downside is the volume when using a phone via Bluetooth. A firmware upgrade and setting the system to deal with high speed road noise still doesn't give the audio presence found in the CX5..
This car behaves in offroad much better that my Pajero 2003 did with faulthy, electric rear diff block (in all of two Pajeros I have had, in one of them also the central diff lived its own life, a widely known problem, which I had not known).
Nice review but no mention of the adjustable driving modes, which is the main gain from the Allgrip model. I have the 2017 Allgrip, the snow/mud mode is great in making the car feel a bit more sturdy and safe in rain or wind, and the lock mode is the "4WD" which is not really a true 4WD but handy for that piece of mind if the terrain is a bit unsteady or that extra traction is needed (btw I have seen a review of the 2017 Allgrip going up against AWD Subarus, Volvos, VWs, and Audis in a traction test and guess who outperformed them all 😉) But the best aspect is the SPORTS mode: essentially it adjusts the suspension and gear ratios while allowing power to be delivered to all 4 wheels as needed, thus allowing the turbo to really shine. As well as being more fun this feature is actually really handy for navigating busy roads, having that extra "power" in combination with improved traction is a great thing to have at your disposal. So why pay extra for the Allgrip? If you live in area that has a combination of variable weather, busy roads, various terrain types then yes, you won't regret it, I love it. But if you live in suburbia/metro then it's probaly not worth it, maybe just stick with the standard turbo.... MAJOR NOTE THAT SUZUKI DON'T TELL YOU: the towball weight is only 75kg on the 2017 era, and I doubt it will be any better on this one (I haven't bothered to check). This means that despite its claimed towing capacity it is in real life useless for towing anything more than a trailer, so forget about those caravaning roadtrip dreams. You might be lucky if you can find the right small boat and trailer combination...... if you find anything that works please please please let me know! I would cnosider you a legend
I'm very proud and satisfied owner of Suzuki Vitara 1.6 petrol engine front wheel drive, middle trim level 2015. model! I completely disagree with reviewer's remarks about "horrible" and "slow" 1.6 engine since all of this is a huge exaggeration! Yes, this engine isn't very fast or powerful, but it's far from "slow" and it's very efficient and more than satisfactory in 99% of everyday situations if you're usual road driver! In my own experience, this engine showed extremely well even in some more demanding situations, and it's very comfortable and reliable power train for driving on longer routes! It's important to know that this engine isn't made for furious road runners, those caught up in a middle age crisis from some strange reason desperately needy of road monsters..., so this remark about "slow" engine is actually very silly and displaced! And personally I don't see why should this kind of cars - small city SUV-s, esp. very affordable and generously packed ones, should be powerful runners, many of which also spent much, much more fuel for that extra horses, torque... ?!
I ve tried both vitara and scross and believe it or not i ve chose vitara since it is roomier in front (I am 2 m tall) and has more space for the head in the rear than s cross
I have a 2016 Vitara Allgrip Diesel. With my diesel Vitara I can tow 1500 kg, and my caravan weighs 1320 kg. The petrol version can only tow 1200 kg, so the Diesel engine is actually missed...
@druss999 Problem od people like you is that they're just ignorant morons! Don't be lazy! Just turn around your shoulder little bit further from your southern or some other US rural shithole and you'll see that nobody anymore is looking for fuel hungry tanks on roads since that's idiocy in so many possible ways! Nobody in Europe, Australia, Asia, ... is driving these obsolete cars anymore! And even in the US that is changed considerably, esp. in all bigger cities!
The Vistara S turbo Allgrip was released early 2017 which is what I have! You didn't even mention that. You mentioned that the 2019 was the first one released after the older 1993 to 96 model which is the one I also owned before the 2017 model.
Not fast? Sorry i owe a 1400 turbo all grip automatic, it does 0-100 km/hr in about 8.0 secs. sec. And keeps on pulling. And very good on fuel, i alreadt did 5 l/100 km.
Suzuki lied about the power, the pre hybrid versions are around at 150ps/112kw and 180ft-lbs/244nm, unfortunately the later hybrid versions are exactly what Suzuki says power wise.
S Cross dumped the huckery CVT in 2017 with the face lift, chrome grille. Now has the same 6 speed auto. No manual in NZ as well as apparently we are all amputees.
I purchased a Suzuki Vitara 66plate petrol June 2020. Thought is was a good choice having second thoughts now. When i first got the car i thought why does it not start as quick as my other car Vauxall corsa petrol. Cut a long story short i had it serviced to manufacturers standards. A week later i had not driven it for only 2 days it took 10 seconds to start was just cranking all that time. Be careful I've read the same issues on the Suzuki forums.
“The Vitara isn’t a huge car, but this back seat is by far the best in the class”. HAVE YOU MET THE S-CROSS YET? You know, the sister car to the Vitara from Suzuki that improves on the Vitara by about 150%? Better interior, better back seat, better boot? If Suzuki drops the safety technology into the S-Cross, it easily beats the Vitara in practicality and functionality, unless you personally prefer the looks and interior of the Vitara.
I've considered both Suzuki models before buying new car, but Vitara, although smaller from two, suited better for my driving needs and also looked nicer to me! That certainly doesn't mean S-Cross isn't great car in it's own right! I've seen many people driving new Suzuki cars, Vitara and S-Cross in Croatia, country where I live. Best regards!
@@fapmashina1 You know it's true. It's almost as bad as the infamous Ssangyong Stavic. I don't think anyone under age 65 would want to be seen driving an S-Cross.
I had to reject my new 2019 1.0 Boosterjet SZT after 25 days due to the doors not opening (using the remote) and then the car wouldn’t start. The day after I picked it up I had to call The AA out, this happened 17 times in total (the AA man showed me a trick to get the car started).The engine cut out 3 times when I was on the road. It’s replacement was ok for 2 months then the driver’s door check strap broke causing the window not to fully open !
You're so wrong about that! I'm 1.9 m tall owner of this Vitara, my wife is also taller and we don't have any issues with "small" interior whatsoever! Actually, among the other reasons, we've chosen to buy this car since it's very specious and comfortable in front row, and that's the case even from behind where it's comfortable enough for three adults unless they're really big ones! Yes, probably like the majority of cars on market, this one could be "small" from the perspective of taller basketball players and likewise individuals, but that's something completely else!
@@AndreiLucaa I don't have panoramic roof version of Vitara. Mine is regular one and there's a plenty of headroom although I'm taller than you. On the other hand it seems that panoramic roof could be somewhat problematic only for taller passengers seating in second row, behind the drivers position. You do know there are adjustable seats in front row? Maybe your seating position is very high and up-front? PS. Maybe you should consider hairstyle change! ;-)
Shane C. Haha! Driving wise the head room is very good considering the fact that you have an adjustable seat. But in the back, the pano roof eats the head room by a lot. Thankfully I’m enjoying the car from the driver seat :)
@@AndreiLucaa Yes! I've heard and seen that panoramic roof eats headroom from behind. Fortunately I don't have that problem! Stay well and enjoy driving great Vitara!
I have the 2017 1.6. I don’t agree it’s gasping. It’s not overly quick but it never ever gives less than 50 mpg.
A delight to drive and the Range Rover copy bonnet looks great. Very happy with my Vitara.
I've just sold a 2014 Swift, owned from new, and zero problems. The revised Vitara looks great and your review was fair and informative. The turbo (2wd) is the best choice. My only criticism of Suzuki is the six month service intervals.
U shudnt get issues in 5 years anyway. Its still Japanese not a European shitbox.
No rear armrest/cupholder, why???
it still works out to be the same cost after 5yrs if it was annually. My only criticism is the delay on parts should you need them.
In Europe the service intervals are 15.000km or 1year. Maybe you do more than 15k km per year.
The backseats look adequately comfortable. For a 6-foot person not to get grasshopper-legs at back is a win.
Suzuki n Subaru, The only cars n the crossover/small suv segment, with good 4wd systems 👍
I have the vitara allgrip .when you do a road test do it probably .the allgrip has a sport mode it make a lot of difference it’s a lot faster and gives the car great handling.
Great car, Purchasing one for my mum soon.
I have a Jimny and I've stuck with Suzuki's for years.
I have alot of experience with Vitara's and they have come a long way since the 90s, They aren't exactly a fully fledged 4x4 anymore but they are actually really capable off-road, I've seen the allgrips show up modern 4x4 utes in the slippery stuff because it's just so light and nimble.
One key thing I think is missing in this is that the allgrid is more than just the 4x4 system, It also has that massive panoramic sun-roof, This is the only spec that receives this.
So for an extra 4-5k you get one of the largest sun-roofs you can get in any car and you get a real 4wd system, Along with better resale value.
I bought this car a week ago, but 2WD top of the range. I'm very happy with it! Great, great value for money imo ! I love it
Andrei Luca how much was it?
Sophie Norris 21900 Euros. 10 years guaranty + a set of winter tires with pressure sensors ( worth 1000 Euros)
Felicitari Andrei! Acum dupa 8 luni, ai aceeasi parere? Ms!
Asta as vrea sa stiu si eu pt ca as vrea sa cumpar o Vitara. Ce am auzit de rau e legat de suspensii si de faptul ca usile zdrangane dupa un timp
@@baboom007 salut, de unde ai auzit asta? Din ce am vazut in toate reviewurile nimic rau.
I have been waiting for this car review. Thank you very much for your review.
Good to see the handbrake
The 4WD in this gives the Audi 4WD system a run for it's money, beating it in places. God knows what this reviewer is talking about, it's amazing.
Well said
I doubt the AWD system in the CX3 and definitely not the Kona are better 🤔🤔🤔
I doubt the interviewer has any clue about how the different awd/4x4 systems actually work and differ.
I personally think that this is a great little car. I have a 2017 1.4 Turbo. It's lightweight and efficient achieving close to 20 km/p/ltr on a freeway run even with aircon. I got 23 once but don't know how. The DCT is positive although a little twitchy in traffic but it actually gives you a good feel unlike a standard torque converter. Just don't 'creep' in traffic, that's the golden rule. The paddle shifters are handy for those 60 downhill runs where the police are waiting at the bottom with their devices at hand. The Atlantic Turquoise isn't for everyone but I like it and it's easy to find in a car park. Why are the reviewers complaining about the plastics? All cars are basically the same. The seats are very comfy, the back seats are roomy and the entertainment system is simple. Adjusting the volume via the steering wheel is so handy as is changing modes, Apple CarPlay, FM, AM, flash drive etc. Highway driving is extremely efficient, either choose the Cruise Control or the speed limiter, set and forget. The only little downside is the volume when using a phone via Bluetooth. A firmware upgrade and setting the system to deal with high speed road noise still doesn't give the audio presence found in the CX5..
They complain about the plastics because plastic should be softer where your body parts touch.
That's the ergonomic part of it anyway.
This car behaves in offroad much better that my Pajero 2003 did with faulthy, electric rear diff block (in all of two Pajeros I have had, in one of them also the central diff lived its own life, a widely known problem, which I had not known).
2018 - looks
2019 - safety features
Nice review but no mention of the adjustable driving modes, which is the main gain from the Allgrip model. I have the 2017 Allgrip, the snow/mud mode is great in making the car feel a bit more sturdy and safe in rain or wind, and the lock mode is the "4WD" which is not really a true 4WD but handy for that piece of mind if the terrain is a bit unsteady or that extra traction is needed (btw I have seen a review of the 2017 Allgrip going up against AWD Subarus, Volvos, VWs, and Audis in a traction test and guess who outperformed them all 😉)
But the best aspect is the SPORTS mode: essentially it adjusts the suspension and gear ratios while allowing power to be delivered to all 4 wheels as needed, thus allowing the turbo to really shine. As well as being more fun this feature is actually really handy for navigating busy roads, having that extra "power" in combination with improved traction is a great thing to have at your disposal.
So why pay extra for the Allgrip? If you live in area that has a combination of variable weather, busy roads, various terrain types then yes, you won't regret it, I love it.
But if you live in suburbia/metro then it's probaly not worth it, maybe just stick with the standard turbo....
MAJOR NOTE THAT SUZUKI DON'T TELL YOU: the towball weight is only 75kg on the 2017 era, and I doubt it will be any better on this one (I haven't bothered to check). This means that despite its claimed towing capacity it is in real life useless for towing anything more than a trailer, so forget about those caravaning roadtrip dreams. You might be lucky if you can find the right small boat and trailer combination...... if you find anything that works please please please let me know! I would cnosider you a legend
I'm very proud and satisfied owner of Suzuki Vitara 1.6 petrol engine front wheel drive, middle trim level 2015. model!
I completely disagree with reviewer's remarks about "horrible" and "slow" 1.6 engine since all of this is a huge exaggeration! Yes, this engine isn't very fast or powerful, but it's far from "slow" and it's very efficient and more than satisfactory in 99% of everyday situations if you're usual road driver! In my own experience, this engine showed extremely well even in some more demanding situations, and it's very comfortable and reliable power train for driving on longer routes! It's important to know that this engine isn't made for furious road runners, those caught up in a middle age crisis from some strange reason desperately needy of road monsters..., so this remark about "slow" engine is actually very silly and displaced! And personally I don't see why should this kind of cars - small city SUV-s, esp. very affordable and generously packed ones, should be powerful runners, many of which also spent much, much more fuel for that extra horses, torque... ?!
Shane C. Agree! My 2014 Suzuki S-Cross shares the 1.6L and it’s more than enough :)
@@Skuzza24
Great point!
Yep! too much of teenage exaggeration
Love this car. A joy to drive
I ve tried both vitara and scross and believe it or not i ve chose vitara since it is roomier in front (I am 2 m tall) and has more space for the head in the rear than s cross
Just bought this car! Great review!
Hopefully better tyres than the continentals that were on the previous model
I have a 2016 Vitara Allgrip Diesel. With my diesel Vitara I can tow 1500 kg, and my caravan weighs 1320 kg. The petrol version can only tow 1200 kg, so the Diesel engine is actually missed...
They need to make a bigger more refined Jimny and bring it to the US!
Yes and make it like a 5 door wrangler so families can go off road!
And to make it as just another fuel hungry beast from the whole bunch of similarly unnecessary large, American style chunky cars!?
@druss999
Problem od people like you is that they're just ignorant morons!
Don't be lazy! Just turn around your shoulder little bit further from your southern or some other US rural shithole and you'll see that nobody anymore is looking for fuel hungry tanks on roads since that's idiocy in so many possible ways! Nobody in Europe, Australia, Asia, ... is driving these obsolete cars anymore! And even in the US that is changed considerably, esp. in all bigger cities!
No they don't!
Did he just say a generic AWD system is betterthan the suzuki 4WD ? time to block this random channel.
The Vistara S turbo Allgrip was released early 2017 which is what I have! You didn't even mention that. You mentioned that the 2019 was the first one released after the older 1993 to 96 model which is the one I also owned before the 2017 model.
At 3:25 clipping off the side parts allows you to store some rods or rails or poles crosswise. :)
Not fast? Sorry i owe a 1400 turbo all grip automatic, it does 0-100 km/hr in about 8.0 secs. sec. And keeps on pulling. And very good on fuel, i alreadt did 5 l/100 km.
Suzuki lied about the power, the pre hybrid versions are around at 150ps/112kw and 180ft-lbs/244nm, unfortunately the later hybrid versions are exactly what Suzuki says power wise.
This car would do well in the US, are you listening Suzuki?
Where was this bridge behind you at the begining may I ask? Great scenery. Great vid as always...
S Cross dumped the huckery CVT in 2017 with the face lift, chrome grille. Now has the same 6 speed auto. No manual in NZ as well as apparently we are all amputees.
I purchased a Suzuki Vitara 66plate petrol June 2020. Thought is was a good choice having second thoughts now. When i first got the car i thought why does it not start as quick as my other car Vauxall corsa petrol. Cut a long story short i had it serviced to manufacturers standards. A week later i had not driven it for only 2 days it took 10 seconds to start was just cranking all that time. Be careful I've read the same issues on the Suzuki forums.
It's "fabulous" he wanted to say I think
So does it still have the door closing force problem?
Now, now... Fred.
@@MrBenHaynes Oh I mean mentally ill lone wolves sorry
The awd isnt very good? Didn't it ace the roller test which showed it has a superior awd system compared to just about anything.
Great Review. Nice Car.
Can the AWD/4WD go on sand?
Cup holders is the least important accessory for me...
What is the best price for the vitara
Infotainment and handrest in back sit
“The Vitara isn’t a huge car, but this back seat is by far the best in the class”.
HAVE YOU MET THE S-CROSS YET? You know, the sister car to the Vitara from Suzuki that improves on the Vitara by about 150%? Better interior, better back seat, better boot? If Suzuki drops the safety technology into the S-Cross, it easily beats the Vitara in practicality and functionality, unless you personally prefer the looks and interior of the Vitara.
If S Cross does get the safety tech - might consider it more over this
I've considered both Suzuki models before buying new car, but Vitara, although smaller from two, suited better for my driving needs and also looked nicer to me!
That certainly doesn't mean S-Cross isn't great car in it's own right! I've seen many people driving new Suzuki cars, Vitara and S-Cross in Croatia, country where I live.
Best regards!
The problem with the S-Cross is the front end looks like a hippopotamus that’s been punched in the face.
@@corkeymonster
LOL! I guess design of every car is matter of personal taste or aesthetics.
I don't think S- Cross is that bad looking...
@@fapmashina1 You know it's true. It's almost as bad as the infamous Ssangyong Stavic. I don't think anyone under age 65 would want to be seen driving an S-Cross.
Qué mal, en México la versión tope que es all grip boosterjet no tiene techo panorámico.
Can't wait to tell Mahk
I had to reject my new 2019 1.0 Boosterjet SZT after 25 days due to the doors not opening (using the remote) and then the car wouldn’t start. The day after I picked it up I had to call The AA out, this happened 17 times in total (the AA man showed me a trick to get the car started).The engine cut out 3 times when I was on the road. It’s replacement was ok for 2 months then the driver’s door check strap broke causing the window not to fully open !
tail light is hilarius
The ‘Turbo’ moniker is for Aus only. A bit naff to be honest!
This guy could talk under water.
does it have a spare tire?
Only a Space Saver. I have a 2018 Turbo.
…there is enough space in the tyre well for a full sized spare..I have 2022 1.4 turbo all grip
The back needs improving
100kilos lighter than the CX 3 😶
Bring back the mighty Suzuki X-90, sort of like a Mazda MX-5 for people with an SUV fetish!
Wish this guy would stop mumbling to himself. He is so precious - not !!
This car in this colour hurts my eyes on the road.....and they seem to only sell this car in THIS COLOUR!
So cheap inside ((
The interior is to small for tall people.
You're so wrong about that! I'm 1.9 m tall owner of this Vitara, my wife is also taller and we don't have any issues with "small" interior whatsoever! Actually, among the other reasons, we've chosen to buy this car since it's very specious and comfortable in front row, and that's the case even from behind where it's comfortable enough for three adults unless they're really big ones!
Yes, probably like the majority of cars on market, this one could be "small" from the perspective of taller basketball players and likewise individuals, but that's something completely else!
@@fapmashina1 I have this car too, but you sure have the one with panoramic roof? I'm 1,86cm and my hair touches the top
@@AndreiLucaa
I don't have panoramic roof version of Vitara. Mine is regular one and there's a plenty of headroom although I'm taller than you. On the other hand it seems that panoramic roof could be somewhat problematic only for taller passengers seating in second row, behind the drivers position.
You do know there are adjustable seats in front row? Maybe your seating position is very high and up-front?
PS. Maybe you should consider hairstyle change! ;-)
Shane C. Haha! Driving wise the head room is very good considering the fact that you have an adjustable seat. But in the back, the pano roof eats the head room by a lot.
Thankfully I’m enjoying the car from the driver seat :)
@@AndreiLucaa
Yes! I've heard and seen that panoramic roof eats headroom from behind.
Fortunately I don't have that problem!
Stay well and enjoy driving great Vitara!