KingdomCraft: 3 common heresies in "Reformed" Churches today
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- Music:
The first song is the music for Psalm 117 of the Genevan Psalter by Claude Goudimel. The lyrics to that can be found here:
genevanpsalter...
The rest of the music is written by me.
What an impressive young man! I admire your Minecraft skills, as well as your theological skills. Keep up the good work. -From a Gen X-er
Thank you! :)
Thank you for bringing this stuff back to our generation, its much needed
Bro, I can't believe I stumbled upon my favorite Reformed meme page on CZcams. The Lutheran meme squad has been alerted to this channel's existence.
God bless ❤ Praise the Lord our Savior 🙏
I think it’s better to address why so many heresies are coming from baptists and Pentecost
True. Pentecostals/popular charismatic preachers especially. They can't go a single sermon without saying something blasphemous.
@@guyontheinternet8891 Well that is what happens when you have little to no doctrine. I have seen some online, maybe Pentecostals and or non-demonations saying they don't recognize any of the councils
@@elKarlo
I grew up in a Baptist church and it had little doctrinal adherence. The doctrine for the day was just however the relatively uneducated preacher interpreted a small section of the Bible. A lot of if not most regular baptist preachers are like that, uneducated hicks with zero theological knowledge self interpreting the Scriptures and in turn falling into heresies by accident. Though Reformed baptists are a lot better in that regard.
speaking of classical theology, could you do videos on like classical theism? lol sorry if i keep requesting stuff
Love the content brother. I watched over your video again, and now I completely understand your point! Thanks for the clarity🙏🏾🙌🏾
What do you think makes something a heresy?
When I say "Mary was not the mother of God," I mean to say that she was not the mother of the Father and the Holy Spirit, and that she did not conceive Christ's divine nature (because Christ's divine nature always existed). This is why I would say she gave birth to Christ, but not God though Christ is God.
That smacks of both Nestorianism and Partialism.
Also he defines heresy thoroughly in the video.
@@alexlancaster5455
"Also he defines heresy thoroughly in the video."
Alright, what does he say makes something a heresy and why?
"That smacks of both Nestorianism and Partialism."
I guess you do not know what those are.
@@__-tn6hw Church councils about the nature of God, because Reformed is in keeping with the lowercase-c catholic, apostolic, historical understanding of Christianity.
Partialism is dividing the divine nature into parts: Father, Son and Spirit. If you say Mary is the not the mother of God because she is not the mother of the Holy Spirit or the Father, then you are insisting that Mary is the mother of only PART of God. But God is not made of parts, so Mary either bore or did not bear God. Seeing that Jesus is God, and Mary bore Jesus, then Mary bore God.
@@hyreonk
"Church councils about the nature of God, because Reformed is in keeping with the lowercase-c catholic, apostolic, historical understanding of Christianity."
What gives them authority on what makes something a heresy? What do they base their conclusions on?
"Partialism is dividing the divine nature into parts: Father, Son and Spirit. If you say Mary is the not the mother of God because she is not the mother of the Holy Spirit or the Father, then you are insisting that Mary is the mother of only PART of God. But God is not made of parts, so Mary either bore or did not bear God. Seeing that Jesus is God, and Mary bore Jesus, then Mary bore God."
That would be a false dilemma, just because I reject Mary as the mother of God does not mean I stand in partialism. By saying she is not mother of Christs divine nature (His Godhood), I am saying she did not conceive the totality of God (what the title "mother of God" indicates). She only conceived the human portion of Christ (his human nature), not God as a whole.
Dude you gotta start using a blast furnace. LOL
how does divine simplicity work with perichoresis?
Divine simplicity just means God's essence isn't made of parts. However, essence is a different category than person. So we can rightly say God is 3 persons and 1 undivided essence.
Dude you missed a brilliant opportunity for a Patrick joke in here 😂 0/10 very disappointed
ahhh I'm disappointed in myself too :(
Good video!
I would say that you are un-informed about social trinitarianism. IMPORTANT: Very few social trinitarians state that the three persons have three wills. They have one will through Perichoresis. By being related by eachother. There are multiple forms of social trinitarianisms. The one thing that is common for social trinitarians is their focus on the threeness of God rather than the oneness.
In simple terms from a church history perspective:
Cappadokians- Social trinitarian
Augustine and tertullian- Psycological trinitarian
In short, social trinitarianism does not need to be heretical, But can be. It depends.
Marr didn't create God. Mary NURTURED God, Mary loved God in a way none of us can exactly understand. God was her baby, and she was Gods servant. There is so much beauty in the relationship between Jesus and Mary. She is truly the best amongst us.
Do you deny that God's essence is just existence?
I think you commit the same logical fallacy calling monothelitism a heresy as Jmac commits when he refuses the title theotokos for Mary and contradict yourself.
Consider the similarity between statements:
Jesus is God, but you can’t say Mary is the mother of God, because Mary was just the mother of Jesus as touching his humanity, and you also can’t say God died, because while Jesus is God, God the Son is necessary and can’t die, so Jesus only died as touching his humanity.
Monothelitism and social Trinitarian are heresy because God has ONE will,
But Jesus has two wills, even though Jesus is fully God, we can’t say God has two wills.
??
16:28
So we shouldn't say, "Lord have mercy," right? Instead we should say, "Lord be mercy." Well that's a factual proposition, not a prayer. So prayer itself violates Divine simplicity because it assumes that its possible for God to do anything other than what you were going to pray for. Don't pray for mercy, no, instead just know that God IS mercy!
Solution: we are using finite human language to try to approach God which will by nature always miss the mark.
“He has mercy on whom he wills he hardens whom he wills.”
You’re conflating God’s nature with his action. God is good
But that doesn’t mean that his actions will be good for all creatures.
God is merciful, but that doesn’t mean he expresses that mercy to everyone.
God is love, that doesn’t mean it varies in it’s effects.
@@ToReconcile sure sure but my point remains; if God IS His attributes rather than having those attributes, then prayer is not only futile but blasphemous
The definition you gave of heresy is wrong, it is basically your opinion.
Oxford dictionary
Heresy: Belief or opinion contrary to orthodox religious (especially Christian) doctrine.
The problem is to define what is Orthodoxy.
You cannot condense complex topics to dictionary definitions. If you do that Christianity is a cult and Mormons are christians
Orthodoxy as in the fundamental beliefs about Christianity that all Christians can agree upon
@@Hithereitsme32 According to the Oxford Dictionary, a Christian is "a person who believes in the teachings of Jesus Christ or has been baptized in a Christian church". Won't the Nestorians, who are heretical, call themselves Christian and say they believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ? Can't they say we are the ones who are unorthodox?
@@cro_lok2363 well we could look to historic churches to see what constitutes valid trinitarian theology
@@Hithereitsme32 Why isn't the Assyrian Church of the East considered historic? They've faced many challenges and made numerous contributions to Middle Eastern Christianity despite being Nestorian
Welp guess I'm a damned heretic then