Newcastle Owners to Pay ‘Luxury Tax’ for Unlimited Spending this Summer!?
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 04. 2024
- Subscribe for FREE!
Support the Channel on Patreon: / roobenstein
Instagram: / roobenstein7
Twitter: / roobenstein7
Facebook: / roobensteinyt
#Newcastle #NUFC #transfers - Sport
I've read that article Rob, sounds a good alternative to get us up to the level of the so called top 6 without risking penalties like relegation or a serious points deduction. Lets hope it happens mate 🙏🙏🖤🤍🖤🤍
Luxury tax is extortion. Buy what you like as long as you pay the PL 😂a sweetener.
The PL are gangsters, take legal proceedings, shut them jdown
I think it's more a case that City as well as others are in the League's sights now. Was fine when only 'minnows' were being affected by penalties but now the big boys are targets too it's a whole different ball game. The reasoning behind PSR was always suspicious anyway but when it prevents teams who can afford to pay from even keeping players it's ridiculous.
Personally no to the luxury tax, just scrap FFP if teams overspend and go under as a club so what, let them go under. These are simple business economics always has been always will be. This is just a way to make those making silly rules rich, FFP was never to protect clubs, it was always there to make those at the top rich.
Yeah teams like Everton and Forest not in financial trouble can end up being so if they get relegated because of points deductions
How long before theres only the prem left if you went that way
@@ih8utoob51 it was like that for over a hundred years, didn’t exactly lose many, but then again how does removing millions of pounds from a club help it to grow, the only thing to grow under ffp are the Bank balances of the law makers.
Will be top 4 league city Chelsea utd and Newcastle that it because none is else can compete @kevint3845
@@andrewwright4195 15 premier league clubs have billionaire status. Just by that one fact FFP is not necessary, yes the other 5 are not but how does giving clubs fines for improving their squad help anyone, fines for trying and taking risks is pathetic. It just lines pockets.
Any team who broke financial regulations, Forest, Leicester, Everton, Man City still broke those regs under the time of that ruling so I don't see how any of them, especially City can get away with it under a new ruling that didn't exist at the time of their dodgy dealings
The Daily fail is called that for a reason. Jackanory tells more truths than those hacks.
Unlike the Guardian no doubt?
If you have it spend it simples!
Never heard of ffp or prs until we were taken over 🤔
Only issue is, teams competing in Europe would still have to comply with UEFA’s FFP rules, which limit club’s spending on wages, transfers and agent fees to 70 percent of the overall club revenue, so it would help us in the Premier league, but we'd be knackered for Europe.
Yeah why is no one talking about this???
Cos not many are as clever as me, and you 😂
@@StingRay_YT Your poor syntax suggests otherwise.
I like to lower myself and my syntax, to fit in with the common people in my replies 😂 @Thaitanium73
Exactly why don’t folk do their homework before reporting rubbish
FFP is fine to cover wages and bonuses, future loan repayments etc. An owner should be able to bank roll transfer fees outside of those rules, as long as wages are covered.
اشعر ان الان بدا مشروع نيوكاسل بالفعل هيا بنا الى البطولات نيوكاسل
Football only business where an owner cannot spend what they want on said business! Absolutely ridiculous that it’s dictated by PL/EUFA!
if that's true, that's huge
I hope Newcastle United spend on top players in the summer transfer market
LET US SPEND 😂
Idea 2:
If a club wants to spend over their preseason set budget then they must:
The full value of a Player Contract over a 5 year rolling period (ie a 7 year contract, instead of being £0 after 6th & 7th year would continue to be accounted for) is put in full in to an account the day the deal is signed; like wise a structured transfer payment; so should the worst happen; those transfers are paid for and the salaries are covered for a five year period; again no debt on the club; no hung by wages you can’t get off the books 3:15
Or something like those??? 3:15
warmer and nicer weather there ,well here its a blizzard
Can’t see how this fits into uefa rules, so if premier league allow more spend, don’t comply with uefa rules then banned from
Uefa competitions
Fingers crossed Rob!
Ive said this before, my view on it was that, any club that pays over a certain amount like £50m say, has to pay a tax ontop that gets filtered down the football leagues, with no puninshment on the clubs spending on transfers. Also, football is the only business i know of in the world that you can own a business and aren't allowed to invest your own money in to it.
Three thoughts on this.
1. The thing I care most of all about is that Man City get punished. If this is a way to avoid that then a big no!!
2. I don’t want to just be like the other top 6 - the ones we criticise- and just buy our way to glory. I feel that would feel a bit empty in the end.
3. If the money from fines is distributed between teams that didn’t get fined then the whole idea suddenly becomes a lot lot interesting and attractive. It goes some way to offsetting the imbalances.
Need to hear more details. Depends where that money goes. If it goes to lower leagues or grassroots football then it's ok.
I don't think it will have any impact on reducing clubs (including Newcastle) looking at every possible way to increase their revenue.
Schools football too👍
Luxury tax won’t be retrospective. City and Chewsi will still have to take the consequence.
I reckon stopping clubs bankrupting themselves is a great idea. But you’re spot on about having a level playing field. The top six have essentially pulled the ladder up after them in terms of the elite footballer market.
I particularly think the idea around not having to pimp out the stadium to corporate buyers is a good one. We’ll need a different government to get that through, though.
I think there are plenty of good reasons why FFP isn't fair between clubs (established can spend more and maintain positions) but I love robs point regarding fans losing seats to corporate seats etc. Spot on and there needs to be a better solution that puts fans at the heart of decision making. I doubt it will be the regulatory body though....
It's bollocks mate. I'm a Everton supporter with most my family coming from Newcastle. It is totally why they would introduce the tax and not a points deduction. It's all corruption.
If this comes in it’s definitely going to make the richer clubs happier Robbo
My idea(s):
Whatever they spend over their preseason determined budget x 5 times that goes into a rolling 5 year escrow account (an account the owners can’t take money out of) then should they leave and a knew buyer not be able to cover those higher costs the club have access to 5 years of money covering the over spend; meaning the club won’t be thrown in to massive dept or hung by massive wages. It gives a club 5 years to get their numbers straight under new owners or similar eg fan buy out?
"they could of selled" 😂 great english there rob mate 🤣🤣
Sounds great especially with us having a mega rich owner however don’t forget we also have to take into consideration it’s also Jamie ruebans and Amanda’s money 😂
Get big MO on the blower tell him we need his bank details... Were going on a spending spree 🤞🤞
The Man utd investment is the trigger IMO not the city charges
It would be good if luxury tax was paid to grass roots and schools football (state schools!!)
This has definitely come about due to Man City's 115 charges and a way not to embarrass them and the FA itself. If these new rules come into effect us and Man City are the main beneficiaries no doubt and the shackles holding our mega wealthy owners will come off. Very exciting and I hope it happens 🤞🏻
I bet that Man City case speeds up if passed
I bet Man City get off scot-free..........
The tax goes to the teams that have 'comply' and EFL because the prem do not want to fund them anymore
If 2 or 3 clubs pay the tax, how much would each other club actually get from it and would it even be worth it for them. Would only work if the majority of the clubs were taxed and only a few got that money shared between them but then if redtbof league is spending what they want, the clubs who don't are fucked anyway cos they still won't be able to compete
@Magpie74 depends on the how much they over spend and the percentage of the fine. But owners of smaller teams won't be complaining of free money coming in. That could help with there recruitment, infrastructure etc. Why would they disapprove it? Let's be honest, the economy now, these teams, no matter what the ruling is are too far behind to become so competitive
I keep saying this is all well and good but you still have to adhere to UEFA rules unless people leave for the new ESL
It can’t be retro fitted to save previous rule breaks 4:08
This makes sense as essentially FSR/FFP will obstruct EPL teams getting top global players who will go elsewhere
Still wish for a proper academy and loyalty to the club and region
Who is actually talking about a luxury tax and what would be the point in it? We'd still have to comply with UEFAs rules regarding P&S rules to be able to compete in their competitions!! What needs to happen is to get rid of the rules that stop owners sponsoring their own clubs.
if we over spend, paid all taxes.. and we enter europe.. surely we will still break uefa ffp rules right?
FFP was brought in to stop teams spending more than they earn, this was to stop clubs buying themselves into oblivion, but now they can spend what they haven’t got, then be fined for it? Which means they lose even more money? Also what will this mean with UEFA and their rules. But as long as the premier league has clubs putting millions from fines into their bank balance it will be fine.
I think its next June so I've been told
Ask pif if they will pay for the re-pointing on the wall behind ya rob. 😊
The luxury tax should go back in to lower leagues. Maybe smaller Premiership clubs that don't have the revenue.
Grass roots and schools football 👍
Add another 100m net on what ever we have to spend this summer, but we lose 6 points, yes
Who doesn’t wanna see the best players in the world in prem no matter what club they are at! Scary how much money is in football these days worrying where it’s gonna go from here and who will be to afford to go or even buy clubs in the future
umm soo what you are saying the big teams will be raiding Brighton for the next 2 or 3 years :(
Do ittttt
Luxury tax should be used to subsidise ticket prices in the PL
I think the owners would spend the money. They didn’t buy us for the fun of it
Listen to what you are saying! It sounds absolutely like an april fools. Spend all you want and just pay a penalty and just keep buying? That is practically removing FFP for the clubs who have the money.
FFP was always about making sure teams like us and I hate to say it Villa, stay below the "Big Six". But now, FFP could bite the biggest member of the "Big Six" they have to protect their largest commodity. Protect City from fatal punishments and bring in a punishment which is the equivalent to a slap on the wrist. but who cares, FFP changes and it benefits us now so I'll take this favouritism with a smile.
Let’s not forget this luxury tax will go straight to the premier league so they will love that
When FFP was brought in it was with the best intentions but it just doesn’t work we do need something else
All of the fines should go grassroots football, that way less teams will go broke and we can build the foundation of football
Call me cynical but funny how this is happening before Man City and Chelsea have had their 100’s of outstanding FFP breaches dealt with…
About time this inconsistent nonsense was abolished. The Premier League have been behaving like playground bullies in slapping points deductions on Everton and Forest whilst doing sweet FA to Man City and Chelsea. No surprise there. Reckon they didn't much fancy taking on Man City and Chelsea's army of elite lawyers, do you? In reality you are never going to have a level playing field but the clubs outside the top 6 should be allowed to catch up. Otherwise the top 6 might as well be in that European Super League as they will be so far out of reach for the rest. Time for us to flex our financial muscles and put the fear of God in Man City and the like. Bring it on!
But wouldn't this rule change let City off the hook for their 115 charges?
My godman i think youve cracked the case
@@ih8utoob51 There are still UEFA's rules to navigate if we want to play in Europe.
Everton and N.Forest should get their points back if City get off scot-free.......
@@gazof-the-north5708 Agreed. I think the danger to clubs at the bottom of the table is why this has such a good chance of passing a vote. The rich clubs want it, and clubs trying to stay in the league will want to avoid any chance of a points deduction. I can see why they're saying 17 clubs are likely to support this.
@@Robert.Sheard one step skip n jump at a time
If this is true, screw the rules! I say, spend big. Give the top 6 a nightmare. That will teach them to look down on us. Buy a whole new team, let go of some of the dead weight and make up the fine by winning a trophy. That will make them think twice
So who gets the fine
Seems like it is been done to simply get city off with relegation
FINGERS X
Don't mind paying £, richest owners and we shouldn't have to sell players let alone be restricted from buying
I think since the players realised could not buy whoever they have gone down hill. Longstaff burn miggy wilock Murphy all been back to old self’s shame really
Mike Keegan made a follow-up tweet saying point deduction is still considered to be used as penalty.
Point deductions, contradicts what FFP stands for. Teams are losing points spoils the integrity of the league
This hasn’t dated well! 🙂😉
Read the athletic this luxury tax is rubbish
Allow Man City to get away with everything they've done for the benefit of a good window? No thanks. Rather wait a few years and be where we're supposed to. No impatience here, I saw the Ashley era, seems a lot of you didn't.
We did
Pointless assumption at the end and we have ffs 14 years of it, sod Man City it’s not our problem, like a magpie we have to take opportunities, come on marra it’s OUR time 🖤🤍
We can’t afford to lose Bruno & Isak from our team! 🖤🤍