Rocket Launch In a Giant Vacuum Chamber
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 11. 2023
- 🚀 Install Star Trek Fleet Command for FREE now t2m.io/TheActionLabSTFC and enter the promo code WARPSPEED to unlock 10 Epic Shards of Kirk, enhancing your command instantly! How to easily redeem the promo code 👉 t2m.io/promo_STFC
Shop the Action Lab Science Gear here: theactionlab.com/
Checkout my experiment book: amzn.to/2Wf07x1
Twitter: / theactionlabman
Facebook: / theactionlabofficial
Instagram: / therealactionlab
Snap: / 426771378288640
Tik Tok: / theactionlabshorts - Věda a technologie
🚀 Install Star Trek Fleet Command for FREE now t2m.io/TheActionLabSTFC and enter the promo code WARPSPEED to unlock 10 Epic Shards of Kirk, enhancing your command instantly! How to easily redeem the promo code 👉 t2m.io/promo_STFC
6:26 Try to find the least atmos pressure thet human can breath....try to find the limits...but please dont die...we love you soo much😢❤
Gravity is not a force, and only no resistance or a lack of enough resistance makes things fall...9/11?
How much force is exerted outward on the interior of a rocket in a vacum. What happens to an aluminum can inside a vacum?
Approximately 25% of this video is a f*cking ad! Not even broadcast television is that unbalanced.
Rockets don't work in a vacuum, so NASA only shows us CGI. The Earth is flat with Firmament.
We can all agree that there is no action lab without the good ol' vacuum chamber
anyone still remember when he was called hydraulic press action?
No
Yes...
I can hear that you also get hard from watching his videos!
Yeah and now the vacuum chainber has reached its final form
That's a breathtakingly large vacuum chamber. Of course there's no pressure to getting in it.
Nice puns!!
Way to take the air out of the room...
Aha. Ahaha. Hilarious. I couldn't think of anything funnier than this pun. Look at how everyone is laughing at your very well crafted and thought through joke. Everyone loved that. Totally.
😂
It's so breathtaking...
But it sucks
New fear unlocked:
accidentally getting stuck in there while it’s pulling a vacuum
I studied to be a chemist, and this vacuum chamber scares me because of what will happen if it ever implodes.
Even small vacuum chambers can throw around glass shrapnel at dangerous speeds when they implode - and this monstrocity's explosion will be like a bomb going off: pretty hard to survive if you're in the same room with it.
An implosion is unlikely with walls this thick (assuming it's tempered glass), but it could still happen if the walls got hit hard enough by something that is harder than glass.
@@oleg4966 you are overreacting. Pressure difference never be greater than 1 atm. Too little to be a bomb.
@@Max_Jacobyyou're getting your colloquialisms mixed up. A vacuum isn't enough compared to 1atm to *suck someone through a tiny hole.* You need a much bigger pressure differential for *that.*
But just because it can't turn you into human sillyputty doesn't mean it can't slingshot glass/plastic shrapnel at you at lethal speeds if it re-pressurizes spontaneously from a total vacuum.
@@oleg4966 It's thick acryllic. Nothing bad will happen.
We have experience in vacuum chamber manufacturing. Acrylic walls are 2 inches thick. There is no risk of implosion.
Considering 34.5% of this video was an ad read, I'm surprised at how you managed to fit all that information in. Pretty cool.
It really was much too long an ad for a video of this length.
I got (125 s of ad / 403 s of content) = 31%. Pretty ridiculous, to be sure.
Yes, way too long of an ad
I thought the same thing. Absurd ad length for a video of this length. Very off-putting
He could have easily made this video longer by doing everything super slow. Huge ad segment but information rich content. I think its fair enough.
TAL: I bought a humen size vacume chamber.
also TAL: I wonder what should I use it for?
What should you use your human size vacuum chamber for? Hmm...
Invite your worst enemy over !
Intrusive thoughts... Nooooo
Remake the ending of Total Recall
I hope that no one get hurts with our vacuum chamber.
Seems pretty irresponsible to show a person in a vacuum chamber TBH. It would be deadly if someone turned on the vacuum pump. I'm sure not many viewers have "human-sized" vacuum chambers but still...
It's amazing to see what James is able to do with our vacuum chamber. We're thrilled to see our equipment featured on The Action Lab, and it's fascinating to watch the creative and educational experiments you're conducting. We hope you can continue to make more incredible videos with our 'giant vacuum chamber.' Looking forward to seeing what other exciting experiments you have in store for your viewers. Keep up the great work!😀
can I have one too please Ill start a channel all about it lol
Dear @@ImproveConditions
Thank you for your comment and for your interest in our vacuum chambers. We appreciate your feedback, and we understand that transparency in pricing is important. Our primary focus is indeed on "Vacuum Chambers for Packaging Leak Testing," but we also cater to various other applications within the industrial sector.
Regarding pricing, we offer a range of vacuum chambers to suit different needs, and our prices typically start at $5,000 USD for our smaller models. However, the final cost may vary depending on the specific features and customization required for your unique application.
We believe in providing tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our customers, which is why we encourage you to reach out to us for a personalized quote that takes into account your specific requirements. Our team will be more than happy to assist you and ensure that you receive the most accurate and competitive pricing for your project.
Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any further questions or if you'd like to discuss your specific needs in more detail. We're here to help and provide you with the best solution possible.
You're thrilled to see your equipment used for fraud? Ok 😂
@@papalegba6796 There's that little imbecile! Bless your little heart!
Still denying Newtons Laws I see.
@@papalegba6796
Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!
I can't imagine what your new toy set you back. But, with 4.54 million subscribers, I'm certain you've got some excellent vacuum demonstrations up your sleeve.
Plll
I'm slightly miffed that I can't find the price. The Dvaci website just has a button to request a price. The closest I found was a 20 cubic inch metal vacuum chamber for 9k USD. I would guess that's a bit lower than the bigger one made of acrylic shown in this video.
He got it free. Learn to listen. He had to demonstrate space propaganda for it.
@@dylanmcshane9976 Space propaganda?😂
@@dylanmcshane9976 could have just as easily left out that middle sentence, why so salty?
Next video: How long a random viewer could survive in outer space conditions?
🤣🤣🤣
I volunteer to have my body in there with my head sticking outside of the chamber and sealed around my neck, if that is possible without it choking me out.
@@rdizzy1 Wouldn't you have trouble pushing air back out of your lungs against the 14psi? Maybe you'd even over-inflate?
@@rdizzy1that's even worse than being fully inside.
@@LcdDrmr Can hold my breath for a minute or 2. Would also have to do the same inside of the chamber, but less worrying with your head already out, can instantly start breathing once they release the valve.
Glad you enjoyed the flash paper James! I never envisioned it would be perfect for rockets!
combustion isnt the issue in a vacuum. propulsion is. Theres nothing to push on in a vacuum.
Someone never learned what conservation of momentum is.
@@dylanmcshane9976It generates its own gasses that it "pushes" off of. Maybe try learning basic physics.
Whats in a perfect vacuum to push off of child? Nothing. Close your mindless lips.@@Owen_loves_Butters
Rockets work because it has atmosphere to push off of. Its just magic in space though. Humanities population seems to be all children. Brainwashed and without BASIC logic.@@someaccount3438
I would like to see what a Tesla coil would look like if you placed it in a vacuum chamber with the air replaced with a different gas like neon.
Would the sparks ⚡️ be reddish rather than the normal violet colored ones that we get with the nitrogen rich air?
good idea, but electronics might overheat or cant resist against the vacuum.
He can take care of the cooling by covering a large piece of metal with thin nylon(to prevent possible shorts) and using some cheap thermal paste. (A chunk of metal should be able to handle and store some heat)
But I'm not sure about the circuit board. For example, the capacitors on the circuit were not made for low pressure, I am sure they would expand like a balloons
Maybe he can make a small pressure-resistant container and put the Tesla coil inside it, then drill separate holes for only the tip of the Tesla coil and the power cables and plug/seal them with silicone, or if he manages to make a pressure-resistant container, he can simply put the batteries directly inside.
I'm not sure how he can turn it on and off, maybe Spend more money and get a remote control
@@uh-nuhfor control could just use a reed switch and a relay...
Have you ever tried recording sound while sucking out the air out of the chamber? Curious how the sound changes based on the amount of pressure around the microphone (and the air or lack of).
This indeed would be cool to witness in his vacuum chamber
That would be interesting!
Maybe you can somehow test the fact that pure metal alloys can be cut and then fused back again in (an inert) space. Oxidation under normal sircumstances due to oxygen in the atmosphere, prevent metals from fusing back again. Apparently in space this works different. Just be pressing and holding the two metal parts against each other, causes them to weld after some time, in absence of oxygen.
He has done cold metal welding before
Please get into it and see how long you can last in a vacuum. Wait, that's my inside voice. Don't do that. But still, I'd love to see it (just for science's sake!)
There was an accident where someone got stuck in a vacuum chamber. He survived.
This is absolutely what I would do. I want to know what it FEELS LIKE to be in a vacuum chamber. As for the danger, I think it's less dangerous than diving. The maximum force your body could experience is from 1 atmosphere of pressure, assuming you can hold in your breath. Compare that to diving where you experience multiple atmospheres of pressure.
@@frankbauerfulit’s a lot worse than diving.
@@frankbauerful Apart from the fact that your bodily fluids don't boil while diving.
@@frankbauerful I'm afraid you'd have damage done to your body before you could feel it. And probably just the time it takes to lower or raise the pressure precludes a human doing this safely.
I know it's been done so many times before, but seeing something light drop as fast as something heavy is always amazing to see.
Cool video but I think you should be more selective with ads: that game is made with the sole purpose of squeezing money out of people who have no self control and are addicted to gambling. It's not fun to play, it's purely a microtransaction platform.
I agree with your point but tbh that description fits like 90% of games these days.
Just shows this guys Real Character 😂
Great content!! Maybe you could demonstrate Galileo's experiment showing that gravity causes different masses to fall with the same acceleration. Maybe you could use a bird feather, a ball bearing, regular household items, a plastic bag, etc. Thanks.
He did so in an earlier video (feather and a steel ball) but yes, this will allow for larger objects.
Would be interesting to see how various phase transitions of states of matter happen at different pressures
Oh, nice one. Have all kinds of different fluids all lined up next to each other and we can see them start boiling at different pressures.
Ionic liquid (or any liquid with very low vapor pressure) siphon working in vacuum .
You should make a contraption that does nothing but mechanically throw mass out the back to produce thrust, as in reality that is all that is needed (like maybe a tiny compressed spring powered cannon type device). If you were floating around in space, you could produce thrust by taking off one of your shoes and throwing it in one direction, you would then have some thrust in the opposite direction. I think a lot of people don't realize that gas has mass.
No one would throw a shoe like that, they'd chicken out.
Watching too many movies mate..
@@fu3g Has nothing to do with movies, it is basic science, throw mass one way=movement in the opposite direction. Just gave a hypothetical example. The same would be true if you were in a ship in space and you threw cargo out the back, the spaceship would move a small amount in the opposite direction.
@@fu3g - "Watching too many movies mate.."
YET - I BET you think that the "vacuum of space" is like a giant vacuum cleaner - Right?
5:26 omg that laminar jet looks amazing!
I am shocked by the amount and quality of content you create!
I didn't live in the time or place to have Bill Nye or any other scientist like him available on TV, but having access to your videos explains a lot why they were so popular! Fascinating! Thank you so much for sharing all of this!
Bill Nye? Ahahah lucky for you that you didn't means your brain is not that much damaged :))
BTW he's no scientist. He was a car dealer & an actor as well
Shocked? He has 4 Million subscribers. This is a CAREER.
Your experiments are always way more interesting than i expect.
You could maybe put non vaccuum smaller box inside it the big new vacuum box so you could remote open the smaller box and super rapidly drop the pressure. Maybee see if this will insta boil water or explode an apple or something more interesting :)
If you watch any of the live video of the Falcon9 and Falcon Heavy launch and Booster return all the way to KSC, then you have seen definitive proof of "Rocket Propulsion IN a vacuum".
The YT member "Astronomy Live" has taken amazing video of these launches and never loses sight of the side boosters.
I can explain how these videos are proof of rocket propulsion in a vacuum, (if they are willing to actually evaluate the evidence)
The best of his work can be found by searching YT for "Stabilized Footage of Falcon Heavy from Launch To Landing! USSF-67"
Why are you asking people to watch videos made by a criminal?
@@papalegba6796 What makes you say that Astronomy Live is a criminal?
You are a criminal as you engage in slander and defamation every day.
Oh and you LIE every single day.
Get the slowmo guys on this, 100% people will believe the thrust has no effect until the ejected gas hits the wall and builds onto itself. Super slow mo will show the truth.
Why don't you put a smaller vacuum chamber inside the big vacuum chamber to create a super vacuum?
Yeah, he should put the vacuum motor inside the big vacuum chamber. Tho if its not simple plug-in run, the circuit might get some damage from the vacuum. But if its just a simple motor connected to wall, it should be possible
As someone involved in testing rockets for spacecraft, I love these demonstration videos, showcasing fundamental proof of concept. While some might argue that rockets cannot operate in a true vacuum akin to the high vacuum levels of deep space, this video still holds educational value despite the vast differences between deep space vacuum levels and a off the shelf vacuum pump.
You don't test rockets 😂
@@papalegba6796 how are you going to tell me what I do for a living lol...
@@mrarby9780 "everything on the internet is real" said nobody, ever 😂
@@papalegba6796 doesn't mean everything on the internet is fake
@@papalegba6796
Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!
This is amazing, can’t wait to see all the different experiments you can do with this
We can’t wait to see the next experiment.
Use the big vacuum chamber to pull the lid off of your small vacuum chamber.
"Let's see if we can do it without destroying the rocket this time."
- Elon Musk
- Find a a way to make a plant survive Mars atmosphere
- The simplest possible mini greenhouse that could survive Mars atmosphere with solar power
- Can a low power laptop/raspberry survive the vacuum of space?
- A mini regolith water extractor that operates in vacuum (like on the moon)
Something to try: Place your old vacuum chamber into the new big one and activate the big one first, and when it reaches almost vacuum activate the old one and see if it can create additional vacuum inside of it. Maybe it won't be able to create additional vacuum since almost no air to pump, hence there will be no pressure difference between outside and inside of it to press on the cover from the outside and make a tight seal.
hell yeah bro, critical thinking is the shit
Great video as usual.
Could you consider testing photographic film stability in a vacuum at some point in the future?
it would actually be more stable. they used to vacuum pack rolls to add shelf life in the 70's
Here’s an idea! Shine a 30,000 lumen flashlight on the flash paper!
that's gonna really burn!
"What else should I use my giant (human-size) vacuum chamber?"
When intrusive thoughts hit
i'm sharing this with every flat earther who says a rocket needs air to push off of. but knowing them, they would say it pushed ff the side of the side of the chamber.
He gets some of the most incompatible sponsors with his channel
Maybe Dvaci vacuum chambers would be a good fit..
I think it might be cool to try a farnsworth fusor experiment to perform fusion. Fusors tend to be difficult to see because of the bulky vacuum chamber surrounding it. but if you have a large chamber you could show more clearly all of the parts and since the fusor creates a glow you may be able to visualize the operation more clearly. I'm not sure what the vacuum requirements are though. Also requires being able to inject small amounts of deuterium fuel.
This. And do some other plasma experiments also, adding small amounts of different gases, making big objects glow and such.
A demonstration at the voltages and pressures needed for fusion would produce a large number of X-rays. The steel walls of typical fusors attenuate the radiation, keeping the operator safe. A radiation shield would need to be constructed if he would build a working fusor in this chamber.
That aside, there is likely too much off-gassing from the plastic of this chamber. The pressure he reached here was 0.02 atmospheres, for fusion you would need around 0.00001 atmospheres.
@@lesliespeaker668 broken tube light in that
It's wierd, I thought the smoke in the vaccume, at least in the initial stage, will have a curvy trajectory due to the gravity and airless environment. But turns out, though without turbulance, the smoke jet still traveled a quite straight line, and dispersed into all directions after hitting the wall like it's in the air.
SUGGESTION - I know this might seem crazy, but try putting a regular fan in there and see if it moves. (I know there's no air, but try to prove there isn't 'something' in a vacuum.) I do like your videos!!
Yes! And hang a feather in front of the fan so that at full vacuum and the fan running at maximum speed, the feather doesn't move.
@@JustWasted3HoursHere I think the feather probably still would move either from electrostatic forces or from the movement of the small amount of air still in the chamber.
@@barneylaurance1865 well that's exactly what makes it potentially interesting to test.
@@barneylaurance1865
The first part can be solved with adequate grounding, the second one with good enough vacuum.
Also he ran tests with drones inside the vacuum chamber before.
@@JustWasted3HoursHerecodys lab did it on his channel quite a few years ago. the lightweight downy type feather would NOT move at ALL once the air was gone.
And in this video, I think the syringe moved only because it pushed off the wall of the box, because there is no air to push . I don't think it would move in a vaccume type of outer space.
Also Cody's Lab fan experiment showed me that helicopter drones wouldnt fly on mars.
but action lab has this donated vaccume cube, plus all kinds of sponsers now, wearing the NASA shirt and sponsered by star trek game........ so I'm expecting to see more bias than usual.
It would be cool to see what happens to a plant in the vacuum and how long it would survive for
Not very long, it would dessicate the plant in short order, maybe an hour or so, though of course it would take longer for a large plant like a tree. It would definitely be an interesting experiment though, I should try it myself, though my vacuum chamber is only a 10" x 6" cylinder so it would have to be a small plant, like a succulent or something along those lines...
I don’t think plants can survive in high vacuum.
@@Dvaci But water bears CAN. If they are in their suspended animation state.
It appears to me, that there was no propulsion until the smoke interacted with the wall of the container... 5:23
It doesn't start moving until long after the smoke hit the wall. likely because the reaction started out too slow to produce enough pressure to move the syringe. Once most of the flash paper caught on fire the exhaust speeds went up exponentially and that's when it started moving
So your theory is that the syringe got pushed from the far end through a thin column of smoke...? Like, seriously?!? Cool, next time let's push the syringe with a rope...
@@ernakthehun Maybe you're right, but I'd like to see this done in a larger container to rule it out. Or at least done without the propulsion pointed to the closest wall like in this video.
@@0fficialnomad so what’s your physical justification for your theory? I don’t see how a column of smoke could provide direct force between two objects
@@ernakthehun When slowed down, it's clear that the smoke reflects off the container wall and back towards the rocket, which brings to question the actual cause of propulsion, which can be ruled out. I can appreciate why this may be bothersome to those unwilling to accept that they're wrong about the cause. I personally want to know beyond reasonable doubt, regardless of the cause, because I seek truth unequivocally.
Excellent video! I truly love channels like yours! Seeing this concept in such a simple, yet highly effective way, makes it so much more interesting and amazing!
You should make a pressurized capsule to put inside (basically a space station)
I think a cool idea would be to mount the rocket on a track or in a way that it wouldn’t run into anything and see how fast and how long you could get it to going. Very nice video by the way!
That vacuum chamber is awesome, James!! I love it! 🤩
I'm glade to see that you love our "giant vacuum chamber"
I thought you were going to slightly depressurize the chamber while you were in it. Glad you haven't lost it to that degree yet 😆
When I heard what the first planned experiment with new vacuum was I was like, eh. However, seeing it action was extremely cool! Especially the larger attempt with the visible propulsive stream. Very nice.
cant wait to see what kinda things will action lab do with such a vaccume chamber 💀💀
I hope you enjoy our vacuum chamber 🎉
@@Dvacisure will! 😄
I think you should reduce the pressure to Mars ground level, and colab /w Daniel at Rc Test Flight and fly a modified drone inside the chamber! Or maybe the Think Flight channel? JPL in Pasadena is probably too busy to help 😅
"Collaborate with", not "colab /w". Don't destroy your language.
check out Cody's Lab from a few years ago with afeather and fan and Mars type atmosphere.
I must confess I expected you to check the lowest pressure where you would feel good enough. It was silly of me to expect that 🤣
Connect your giant vacuum chamber to a tiny vacuum chamber with a fast valve to show rapid decompression in the tiny vacuum chamber.
A 2 minute ad in 6.5 minute video. Good Lord.
A video of a fraudulent experiment too. The guy is shameless but space nerds are easily fooled😂
@@papalegba6796
Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!
Back when Robert Goddard published his first papers on rockets, the New York Times wrote an extremely dismissive editorial, claiming rockets would never work in a vacuum. They printed a retraction on July 20, 1969 when Apollo 11 landed on the moon.
Yeah that was a dark day for science. NASA is scientology but funded by the government 😂
@@papalegba6796 Nope, just actual science.
@@zounds010 ok L Ron Hubbard... Real good NASA science, like Don Pettit says 😂
@@papalegba6796
Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!
Here's a weird question: if you mount the rocket to the floor of the chamber without the lid on, it should produce a thrust against the table, which is connected to the vacuum chamber. Place a scale under the vacuum chamber... the rocket should cause a positive change to the scale equal the thrust of the rocket.
Then, place the lid of the vacuum chamber on but don't evacuate the air and repeat the experiment. Does the scale measure a change?
Then, evacuate the vacuum chamber and repeat the experiment. Does the creation of a closed vacuum system allow the rocket to impart its thrust onto the scale?
whoa, don't scare your Mother like that!
1/3 of the video is an ad lol
...And the rest is fraud. This guy should be in jail 😂
Hi! Put inside soda bottles, champagne bottles, something with high pressure inside. Also, balloons! Keep up the great work, cheers from Italy!!😊
pretty sure he already did those, but I guess it doesn't hurt for them to have more space.
@@nicholas-dv1mg yes! That's what i meant!☺️ Or many of them💪🏻
I would like to see this guy test the Biefield-Brown Effect in a vacuum chamber. However instead of using only DC for both electrodes; high voltage high frequency AC would also be used only for the negative collector electrode and high voltage DC would be used only for the positive electrode. Another experiment I would like to see this guy perform is Edgar Fouche's TR3B magnetic field disruptor (but on a much smaller scale device).
If you put your old vacuum chamber inside this vacuum chamber and pull a vacuum on both, you will have negative vacuum. This is how black holes are made.
fe'ers with the "nah ahh" in 3.... 2..... 1....
Have you ever tried to let a plant do fotosynthesis in martian atmospheric composition conditions (at surface level) ? Ofcourse not the freezing temperature conditions! Just the 98% carbondioxide at martian air pressure. Maybe try to burn a candle with the oxygen produced by the plant. For a nice visual effect!
The plant would die. Pressure on Mars is effectively a vacuum. No photosynthesis. Plant desiccates as turgor drops and that's the end of it.
Photosynthesis requires water (in addition to CO2 and light). Not much of it remains inside the cells at such low pressures.
“I finally got a vacuum chamber that can fit a human!” ……That’s not suspicious at all
Congratulations. This was the perfect example of its not the speed that kills you, its the instant stopping.
Try boiling water inside the chamber using fast-burning paper.
You won't need burning paper to make it boiling as vacuum would be enough for that
Thanks, Action Lab. I've described how rockets work to Flat Earthers (who claim rockets can only work by "pushing against air in the atmosphere".) I described a very similar experiment to this in a vacuum chamber. They, of course, denied it was possible. Reality is a major stumbling block to them. If I ever run into one again, I'll refer them back to this video.
@@Amplified_Truth 16 paragraphs of pure misconception, misunderstanding and misapplication of Newtonian physics. And then we see the video. You can lead a Flat Earther to the truth but you can't make him think.
@@Amplified_TruthTHANK YOU. Well said. Hopefully the "scientific community" will leave your comment up and allow opposing conversation. Which is rare these days. My 12 yr old son watched this video last night. Immediately when action lab showed the slow mo of the jet stream hit the side of the box and finally move my son said, "LOOK! IT PUSHED OFF THE SIDE OF THE BOX". Then today we brought up the subject and I told him people in the comment section get mad if ypu say that. And I told him that achilds mind that isn't corrupted with programming can see things better than adults that are programmed what to think. He said, yeah, it's like a story we read in school about the emporers new clothes, which really werent there and the only one that said it was a child.
oh, and i should probably clarify, I'm not a flat earther, or at least not yet(I still have to do a laser test across 50 miles of water, to see 4 myself). . Yet I highly doubt rockets can propell themselves in the vacume of the so called outer space.
@@jdriver1419 You fail to grasp simple things like a Flat Earther...such as the blatant content of this video.
@@thudthud5423 okay, I must have an extremely low IQ. 🤪
Congrats on the new vacuum chamber!
Never thought I would be congratulating anyone a vacuum chamber 😄
If Im seeing this correctly, that top is about 3'X2'... 6 sqr feet and at 14.7psi thats about 6.3 TONS of pressure on the top when at a decent vacuum
Yes cos pressure is a vector not a scalar... Oh wait! No wonder people get fooled by this grifter 😂
@@papalegba6796 Oh look, he found new words to not understand.
@@Hobbes746 If you're saying pressure is not a scalar you would be wrong, chatbot. You're not programmed to understand sarcasm, are you?😂
@@papalegba6796
Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!
You can now test how long human can survive without air :)
I'd be more gruesome than you might think
Have you ever tried to put a mouse (dead) or an earthworm into a vacuum chamber to see how a body would act in space
I remember this debate on your channel from years ago. Glad it’s solved now.
Your arm. Make a port in a side so you can stick your arm halfway in. Shouldn’t be too hard to seal around the forearm (but make sure you use the right stuff). Your arm should noticeably expand.
Can u do a human test, keep neck out of vaccum, and check how no air feels like on body.
Ok but maybe start that with like, a hand
And there's a small chance you can't exhale when your body is in vacuum
@@M_Alexandermore like it would be hard not to exhale… gas would be forced out of your body
@@aleccarlson492 that's if your body is in high pressure, like being underwater. If the pressure at your head is higher than the pressure around your torso, you'd be fighting the pressure to exhale
@@M_Alexander nah bro. High pressure arrow pointing in. Low pressure arrow pointing out. Vaccum chambers are created by sucking air out…
Why don't u wear an oxygen mask in the chamber😂
I know you are joking, but in case anyone isn't aware, an oxygen mask doesn't work in a vacuum. Without pressure outside your chest to balance the pressure inside your chest, you can't breathe. There would be no way to exhale against the pressure from the mask. Even if you took the mask off to exhale, I don't think it would really work.
it would dilate his blood vessels and it would make him go unconscious even with the oxygen
"Hello CZcamss, my name is TheGuyFromTheActionLab and I realized that to expand my audience I need to start with myself. Henceforth I decided to expand myself using this brand new and approved human-sized vacuum chamber. 9/10 testing probants literally popped their eyes out by watching this new device operate. I'm next because I want to become a bigger CZcamsr. But this is not solely for my ego, it's for SCIENCE and for that I need to take ACTION in my LAB, the ACTION LAB!!!. I really believe that this new device will allow my channel any myself to blow up."
Make a scale model of the stay-puff marshmallow man, and then super-size him in the vacuum chamber. Just don't cross the streams.
The slow motion shows that the syringe remained in place until the gas collided with the glass... In space there is no glass wall.
nope. The slow motion shows that the syringe remained in place for a while after the gas collided with the glass, demonstrating that hitting the glass is not what caused the rocket to move. In space, we have 10,000 successful satellite launches demonstrating that rockets can operate in the vacuum of space.
Instead of the rocket/syringe, can you please demonstrate that launching a small mass (ball bearing?) still causes force/thrust in the opposite direction when in a vacuum chamber?
That would prove it is not pushing off the chamber walls, as some people seem to believe.
Like a ball and spring. Been done. They claim it’s different because it’s “not a gas”
@@engineeringtheweirdguy2103 it obviously is different, chatbot. Claiming solids & gases behave the same is insane 😂
@@papalegba6796 obviously you havn’t heard of the kinematic theory of gasses which correctly describes how gasses operate and is the source of many of the gas law equations we have today, is responsible for things like Dyson cyclonic vacuumes, jet engines, gliders, refrigeration, snow blowers, air-conditioning, etc etc etc and has been proven over and over and over again.
In which the theory states the particles obey the laws of Newtonian physics, and are individual particles with mass, motion and thus momentum. Just like a ball.
@@papalegba6796 anything else you feel like being wrong about today chatbot?
@@engineeringtheweirdguy2103 Holy sh!t you are badly programmed 😂
thanks a lot for the practical example and for these valuable explanations. your content is amazing both in quality and quantity, keep up the good work.
He didn't use a dollar: he used flashpaper printed with 1 dollar graphics.
@@h.dejong2531 you're right, sorry for my misunderstanding, i'll edit the comment.
thanks
"I finally got a vacuum chamber big enough to fit a person inside"
"Lets burn tiny pieces of paper in it!"
Normal peoples: oh it’s so cool!!
Flat earthers: oh no god please no!!
Where is the fire coming from in the case of rockets, though, if it can't exist in a vacuum? Also, how do you have gas pressure (or even a vacuum) without a container?
Action and reaction requires only two objects, one acting on the other. The engine accelerates the burnt gases, and they exert a reaction on the engine. There is no need for a third object or entity for this to work. No atmosphere to be "pushed against". It is the gases themselves that are being pushed, and it is the gasses themselves that cause the reaction on the engine and propels it on the other direction.
Yes, rockets do work in a vacuum.
A rocket is one object, loony tunes 😂
@@papalegba6796
*"A rocket is one object"*
The ejected gas is the other object, child.
Gas (object ONE) is ejected in one direction, the rocket (object TWO) is accelerated in the opposite direction. Need a drawing?
@@coriscotupi the exhaust is part of the rocket, as it moves with it at all times, loony tunes. Same as the propeller on a plane or the wings on a bird. They all push on the atmosphere through which they move, as there is nothing else to push on.
@@papalegba6796 Child, the exhaust doesn't push on anything. The rocket pushes the exhaust out, and the rocket is accelerated in te opposite direction. Action and reaction works by accelerating MASS. The exhaust gas is this mass. No relation whatsoever with the atmosphere. You need to get some schooling.
I won't be surprised if you assert next that the Earth is flat, that airplanes produce "chemtrails", that Man never went to the Moon and vaccines are bad for the health. LOL
@@papalegba6796 "exhaust moves with the rocket" hilarious
He finally did it. He's gonna see what it's like to put himself in a vacuum chamber. RIP Action Lab
I thought he was gonna put himself in the vacuum changer by looking at the thumbnail 😂
You could put a flat earther in there and suck out all the air ?
Then the police would take it away. :(
Another great video mate.
I have a flat earther that I just love to debunk. He has used this video to claim that rockets cant work in space. He I claiming that the syringe didn't move until the stream contacted the far wall, as they know rockets need something to push off of.
Now, do you mind if I also use your video to point out his massive cherry picking lying fail?
I will fully reference you of course which is exactly what he does not do. Thanks for having watermarks in your videos.
keep up the good work.
Read what you wrote. You sound nuts 😂
@@papalegba6796 what who wrote? You really need to be clearer in your communications.
@@papalegba6796
Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!
@@whereswa11y You sound even more nuts now 😂
@@papalegba6796 I didnt expect that you would understand...
Huh, I never thought about the fact that the vacuum of space setting up a huge pressure difference makes rocket propulsion more efficient. Plus you're not trying to push through more atmosphere. This is why I stick around for these videos despite the simple seeming questions asked. Like, 'do rockets fly in space?' is such a simple question to answer through observing rockets flying through space but, as always, the 'why' is where the interesting stuff happens.
A recent starship launch showed us how fast gas/fuel spreads in a near-vacuum space. The moment it exploded, the explosion covered the entire viewfinder of the camera(which is a huge area I guess).
A full third of this video is an ad. Do your ads. But do better.
The rest is fraud. This channel should be banned.
For a next idea I'd say maybe try a ballistic gelatin dummy or something. You know, since it's human sized
more intresting would be if he would use a dead pig or something but he would get so much backfire from all vegetarians and Karens that he used an animal for tests
He finally did it! This must be the greatest the action lab has ever done!
Very cool! You could expand on that laminar flow part. Maybe fix the rocket on one side and watch the smoke stream be steady until it hits the wall.
I can help anyone understand how rockets work, but only if they answer some questions.
I find no amount of trying to force someone to understand will help them.
They must see the answer, themselves.
If they answer a few questions, they will figure out how it works.
Let's think about a rocket engine running right here on earth in an atmosphere before thinking about "in a vacuum".
So, imagine a single Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) igniting right here at sea level.
These consume about 500 kilograms of liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen per second and expel the "exhaust gas" at about Mach Eight.
1 - Does the "exhaust gas" have any mass?
2 - Did the rocket engine "accelerate" this exhaust gas?
3 - Can mass be accelerated by anything other than a "Force"?
Answer these three questions and I will get to the ones that are relevant to "propulsion in a vacuum".
But they must demonstrate that they understand these basic physics terms.
The "Physics Deniers" will refuse to answer basic physics questions.
They ONLY reject anything Engineers and Scientists say.
They cannot even support their denial except to deny.
Watch when troll-master papalegba shows up and denies everything.
Would anyone care to answer the question:
If a Space Shuttle Main Engine "Burns" (Combusts) 500 kilograms of liquid oxygen and liquid Hydrogen *per second* : What IS the "Exhaust gas" and what is the mass of this exhaust gas *per second* ?
(now the educated people would first say "Well, Assuming Stoichiometric ratio of H to O the exhaust gas would be pure ......")
??
@@stuartgray5877
I look forward to seeing the discussion that may soon take place between you, and the many science deniers who are currently fouling the comments under this video :) .
@@CNCmachiningisfun Well as you can SEE the physics denying morons would rather hurl their ridiculous ideas at sounding boards just to hear people say "Oh yeah, definitely" than have an actual Conversation with someone that launches things to space as their job of the last 30 years.
@@stuartgray5877
Indeed. They seem to be proud of their profound ignorance, and overall contempt for reality.
I would pity them, but that would mean that I would have to stop laughing at them.
Your line of work sounds fascinating, and I imagine that you absolutely love it.
Oh, how I envy, in a nice way, those to enjoy their work :) .
I understand the necessity for sponsorship but a 2 min ad within a 6 min video is a little much.
You know they have freaking lasers now with from aircraft’s… unreal. We are so close to being that bad guys from battle Lost Angelos!!
Put a Watermelon inside. Let's see it bleeding.
Hearing him at the beginning say “I finally got a vacuum chamber that can fit a human” makes me feel like he’s planning for something
LOL at the space travel deniers here :) .
Tell me again now 14psi is a vacuum, chatbot 😂
@@papalegba6796 Tell us ALL how rockets can accelerate mass into the vacuum without applying a force to that mass.
Papalegba thinks "Magic" Exists.
@@stuartgray5877 reported for spam, chatbot 😂
@@papalegba6796
GROW UP!
@@papalegba6796 Dictionary definition of vacuum:
a) a space absolutely devoid of matter
b) a space partially exhausted by artificial means (such as an air pump)
c) a degree of rarefaction below atmospheric pressure
What is rarefaction you ask? This should explain it to you: "A natural example of rarefaction occurs in the layers of Earth's atmosphere. Because the atmosphere has mass, most atmospheric matter is nearer to the Earth due to the Earth's gravitation. Therefore, air at higher layers of the atmosphere is less dense, or rarefied, relative to air at lower layers."
Ok.......
-Open a bottle of beer in a vacuum...
-Will yeast rise dough in a vacuum or will the vacuum kill the yeast?
-plasma / electron propulsion in a vacuum.
-Are there any categories of bacteria that will survive a vacuum?
-Are there any categories of viruses that will survive a vacuum?
-Are there any categories of yeast that will survive a vacuum, as above?
-Explode a fire cracker in a vacuum. More profound or the same?
-Make a truly DIY laser in your vacuum? That would be cool.
Many thanks
Demonstrate solid nitrogen. Fill foam coffee cup with liquid nitrogen & put in center of chamber. Close & evacuate. If your pump is fast enough, the nitrogen will first boil fast, then cool to the triple point. Then a cylindrical lacy "ice" structure will slowly grow up out of the cup until it hits the top of the chamber!