499.6 seconds: NASA and Boeing Complete Hot Fire-2 for Space Launch System Core Stage
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 03. 2021
- We fired up NASA Space Launch System Core Stage 1 during Green Run Test 8 - Hot Fire. Our teams conducted a successful full-duration 8 minute (499.6 seconds) hot fire of the Artemis I core stage in the iconic B-2 test stand at NASA’s Stennis Space Center. This is a display of all of the rocket’s power without the launch so we can ensure that it is ready for flight.
NASA and Boeing engineers will take back mountains of data and inspect the core stage to determine how it performed during the test. Video via NASA.
What's Boeing's latest innovation? Subscribe to the Boeing CZcams Channel: / boeing
More great aviation videos:
► Boeing Starliner Crew Prepares Second Module for Flight: • Boeing Starliner Crew ...
► See Starliner launch on Atlas V: • LIVE Starliner launche...
► Starliner Orbital Flight Test Cabin Camera Views: • Starliner Orbital Flig...
Our social media handles:
► Facebook: / boeing
► Twitter: / boeingspace
► Instagram: / boeing
► LinkedIn: / boeing
► Website: www.boeing.com - Věda a technologie
When the standard indoor humidifier just doesn't suffice.
So This is how Rain Clouds are made.
The white hot exhaust plumes instantly vaporized torrents of cooling water flooding the base of the massive B-2 test stand at NASA's Stennis Space Center in Mississippi, just east of New Orleans, sending huge clouds of steam billowing into a cloudless blue sky.
Acid Rain. Water and Methane
@@mauriciochaar the RS-25s burn LH2 don't they?
@@Sodchucker yes
@@mauriciochaar what? The RS-25s burn liquid oxygen and hydrogen, not methane. So the exhaust is all just water vapor.
I lived in Picayune when I was a kid when they were still testing the Saturn 5 engines. From 12 miles away (as the crow flies) it was still impressively loud. Later, I worked at Stennis when they were testing the Shuttle main engines. Impressive to hear and see.
.
Awesome
Amazing. Thanks for posting.
That gimbal was crazy!
Tha blue vortex beneath the engines looks so cool!
Look up Mach diamonds
@@ShashankRockerYo Actually looked quite different from a typical shock diamond, was at 3:03 (and again throughout the later part of the test) and looked like a blue fire tornado.
@@Felto123 Maybe sound waves from the impact of the exhaust against the ground?
@@Felto123 its mach diamonds from an engine even more overexpanded, just look at some vacuum engine tests like the j2 or vacuum raptor
@@ShashankRockerYo tuueutiuetiiututuutuetuuteuuuetuu
I would love to watch this in person. I was fortunate enough in my life to have witnessed three Shuttle main engine tests at Stennis. Nothing like watching it in person, the video as good as it is, just doesn't do it justice.
It was really cool to see in person!
.
Very good! Can't wait for SLS to FLY!
why??
its a huge waste of money
@@juicy4joey which is why it had BETTER fly, otherwise $20 billion will have gone nowhere
@@jordanbaird3808 don't forget the millions Russia got to ferry astronauts
Nice to see a win for Boeing and its great to have the kind of competition we have now, the new commercial space race!!!! SpaceX is some tough competition!
What are you talking about? This is the main stage for the SLS
@@arthurizando Duh!
@@johnbowman476 this is not competing with space x
A had a crush on a girl in high school and now she’s on the team working on this project. Holy moly this is surreal.
The sound of those RS-25s takes me back...
I wonder how fast a 8 minute burn with these engines would get the shuttle up to in space.
Remember when the space shuttle would launch. It took about one minute to get to 47658 feet traveling 912 mph. After 2 minutes speed was 2973 mph at 174450 feet. After 3 minutes, 3929 mph at 281294 feet. After 4 minutes 5438 mph at 339523 feet. At 5 minutes 7462 mph at 357025 feet. After 6 minutes 10222 mph at 347949 feet. After 7 minutes 13897 mph at 336605 feet. At 7minutes 44 seconds speed was 16817 mph at 344726 feet. At this point the engines were set to 67%, there were no G-forces and the shuttle was traveling at Mach 24.7.
Maybe it is required the engine perform without issue for 8 minutes since that is how long they are needed for during launch?
@@latinobazaar You also have to take in to account the 2 solid boosters for those numbers.
@@latinobazaar this rocket has to carry more payload into lower orbit and the burn duration will be a little longer. 500 s like in this test I feel
@@carisi2k11 Yes, my numbers are from telemetry from an actual shuttle launch.
LOL!
Ура, Поехали!
Уже приехали
Amazing powerful engines.....this test reminds me of the Space Shuttle Main Engine tests during the STS program of NASA.
These are SSMEs - in fact, these engines were pulled straight out of storage which they were put there after being pulled straight off of Shuttle at retirement.
They're now referred to more as the RS-25D, and they will be flying these beautiful pieces of machinery one final time and trashing them. It's really sad to see.
Wonderful!! Let's go SLS!!!
One way to get rid o' them darned skeeters
Not a single cloud in the sky to be seen until the test fire. NASA came to party!
That was epic!
Way to go Boeing and all the staff involved, you crushed it!
Such a supreme display of power
In winter, that would be a massive snow-making machine...
Amazing.
Great 7 and half minute video of smoke and water vapor and drone shots of the test rig would have like to have seen more of the actual engines running.
Great job!
good! Finally
Good job Boeing.
rooting for everyone at Boeing, u guys are awesome, keep pushing keeping proving and keep innovating.
Very cool
Intense!
I want my lock screen to be an animated version of that billowing smoke.
Vapor... not smoke
@@claudiomaiasantos steam
@@nolancorrado2317 Hahahahahaha True!
Thank's for the correction!
I want simulation of that steam..
Will it be shipped back to Mccload (or wherever it was build) or direct to KSC for refurbishment? Great work, cant wait to see the launch. Johan.
It will head to KSC
cool
🔥🔥
I wanna be on that rocket some day, or maybe a star ship. I don’t care, I want to be a part of the space program one day so bad you don’t even know!
Well you have a key component to recognizing that....desire!
Get after it, if you've got the passion go after it!
Now we know :-) Good luck and chase your dreams!
A wiser man than me once said "Don't let your dreams be dreams. Just do it."
@Rasta Xde Why? Earth to earth starship launches should be the same price as first class airplane tickets...
Nice
This transmission passed into human history.👍
The moon will be near! Good job!
Now that is a burn out.
Next stop, Kennedy space center!
How about a camp fire lighting?
I start to tear up if I look at the RS25 engine bell for to long.
Go NASA I knew you could do it!
Yes
Battle for the engines begins
And then to see the effect of hit air on trees. Carbon and hot water affects trees.
Thank you again for the camera man who risk his life in the test fire
The camera man has hourly exposures to fire to keep his body in the prepared state.
One day y'all will get new jokes
Great water Pipe job too. Keep runing that amount of water flawless
WOW! I wonder how many gallons of water were vaporized during that test? I'd love to see that in person.
horizontal motion of the bells are okay?
They were testing the gimbal action, totally normal.
Looks like a fail, that building didn't even lift off the ground...
I can't with this comment 😂😂😂😭
I was thinking to myself that the thrusters were thinking "why am I not going anywhere? Must try harder..."
Lol bro
now that's flexing
Poluição hein NASA !
When you consider the fact that's 4 RS-25 rockets and only producing the power of 1.25x F-1 Saturn V Rockets... Still impressive nonetheless.
Still, a lot more efficient
@@iceblade019 Somewhat. There have been now "quantum leap" moments in specific impulse in my lifetime.
I think that shot moved the earth out of its orbit...
Whoa...love power of energy!!! How does this compare to a volcano erupting...
Just did a quick calculation so it might be off, but it should give you an idea of the scale. The rockets would have to run continuously for 32 and half days to equal the thermal output of the Mount St. Helens eruption.
Yeah it’s not really even close
7440 kN and 452S ISP so 7440000*452*9.81/2 = 16 Gigawatts.
That sounds like something Scott Manly would do a video on.
Well, these engines are negligible if compared to a volcano. Even most nukes are negligible (the majority have a low yield).
Now it is time boeing to start doing a spacex and send this in to space.
Oh cool! @4:42 the steam is raining!
Really? 🤔🤔🤔
@@MiraiSarutobii Yes it does rain under those clouds, but no one was rained on, there is a 10-mile radius of buffer zone around the test site.
@@SteverRob gotcha ! Thank you:)
I think this was about twenty times longer than all of the Raptor static test fires put end-to-end.
SLS or Starship, the future for space travel looks exciting.
...don't forget about chinese space program)
The rip-off space program, that buys old 1960s Russian hardware and reviser engineers it. The space program that drops carcinogenic rocket stages on villages and school children. The space program that is not willing share any information to the public and when they have a failure they do a coverup.
Yeah definitely won’t be forgetting about that any time soon.
How many spare engines are there of the rs25? Are they still being built?
@@albertg968 They have 16 left over from the Space Shuttle that they will use for SLS, and Rocketdyne will make more updated RS-25 engines,
In May last year NASA ordered another 18 rs-25’s this order is valued at a cool $1.79 billion USD. NASA already has 16 (including the ones we saw tested here) rs-25’s left over from the shuttle program these engines will fly on Artemis mission 1 to 4. If you add the new engines you will have another 4 SLS flights after Artemis 4 with 2 engines left over.
quick question, will the boosters and core system be returnable and reusable?
Boosters refurbishable and core will be thrown away
@@arthurizando that's a real shame
@@ISAFMobius18 yeah
I do believe the 5 segment boosters will be ditched this time around...just some digital word of mouth, don't quote me on that...
@@arthurizando boosters will not be recovered beacuse
1) nasa already has plans for newer upgraded boosters
2) making new ones is cheaper than reusing them anyway
As for the core, this thing separates while being in pretty much 2200km by 80km orbit, recovery at such speeds would be insanely hard and probably eat a ton of capacity.
We can producte atmosphir and energie and water rain on Mars with smolers SLS 👽...
A song of ice & fire
Next stop....MOON!
Boeing ❤️
Not sure how this is the way forward. Does anyone know how to build more of these engines? These are 1980 space shuttle engines and there can't be that many of them in storage. Nice to see them brought back to life but since they are going to throw 4 of them away with each launch there is a finite amount of launches SLS can do before they run out of engines.
They got a total of 21 in storage including the new 8 that are being made. They are old Space Shuttle engines but some are new.
They restarted the production line and have a bunch on order for new ones
@@rickandbrandonshow LOL dude they have not made these engines in 20 years and even then they did not produce enough for a "production line".
@@taiming71 do you even know what's a production line of rocket engine's? It's not highly automated, it is actually a very manual process
@@arthurizando For a assembly line you need a line. If the engines are pieced together from parts or made one by one that is not a assembly line plus i heard they are each going to cost 143 mill that is a lot to throw away each launch.
The beginning of interplanetary terraforming
Clouds factory 🏭
So this is the actual rocket NASA will launch as Artemis 1 or it’s just for ground tests?
It is the actual rocket
They whole building will fly to the moon. This time they just bolted it to the ground.
Does it use closed-loop cooling like the SSMEs were? Because it seems that there was ice formed on the nozzles after the engines were shut down.
I mean, it would make sense if it's derived from Space Shuttle tech.
Yes. SLS uses repurposed, leftover SSMEs.
We get it, you vape...
That was the most unfunny thing I have ever heard
🌭 No one brought hotdogs....? 🤔✌🏼
Wernher von Braun would be proud.
He actually would, the SLS is a direct descendant of the his baby the Saturn V, it makes me very proud that NASA went back to that amazing design.
@@charlesdjones1 Absolutely, I was being totally serious :)
Not innovative at all thought...
And that was the day Earth left its traditional Solar orbit... no one is quite sure why. The NASA team was simply quoted as saying "DID YOU FEEL THAT POWER!? DID YOU FEEL IT!!?!?"
What was the fire coming from the top of the nozzle ? It look like it was coming from some seam on top I saw 3 different fires dont want to see something happening again you know what I mean
Somewhere I read it was cork insulation burning. Doesn’t seem like a very high tech material for a space craft.
They added extra thermal protection bc they knew it would burn. All you are seeing is the cork and extra shielding burn away. It was expected and not a issue. In a real launch it won’t happen bc of the air moving.
Ablative covering. It was designed to burn like that. Perfectly normal and expected.
(every rocket of the planet - to master a solar system)
Its not a rocket
Its a cloud making machine
Fly me to the Moon🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
I waited for the whole building to take off.
Look at all that smoke polluting the air
*steam - hot water
Is this testament to the strength of concrete?
Imagine how loud that is.
I live 40 miles east of the test site north of Gulfport, MS. and could hear it.
Самый большой парогенератор который я видел!
Let's melt this planet together.... 🚀 all we need is more rockets an v8 cars ...
These engines run on hydrogen
Stop it! This thing is going to push the planet out of orbit. XD
Yey, they managed to make some 20 year old Shuttle engines in the making work for 500 seconds.
A beautiful 20 billion dollars cloud :)
Roket?
Rocket*
Ok
H2Power
That "pollution" is just water vapor the byproduct of burning hydrogen and oxygen. I want to see the size of the bolts that hold that building to the ground.
When I did a tour of the stand, some of the bolts were about the size of a large grapefruit
Why this test has no problem?
FFA 🏇
This huge cloud is made of what?
This is not bad to the planet?
It’s made of water vapor. The engines burn liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen.
Thanks
Please I am Power Plants Mechanic I have over 20 Year experience to General Motor and Caterpillar
10 views, 12 likes
None of YT's likes are real man, why does everyone's comments all have 2.7k likes these days?
@@charlesdjones1 Lol, I never do these type of overrated comments things. Just figured to give it a try. Also, it seems your right lol most do have 2.7k
Matatan Ribirin Hs..Σ(ಠ_ಠ)
took long enough.
$20,000,000,000 total so far for sls. That's $40,032,025.62 a second.
SLS is a Congressional Boondoggle
With throwaway parts
IMO DOA
Was the rocket meant to just burn fuel or was it supposed to actually go up. I don’t know the specifics of everything 😅
TEST STAND: 4 engines (RS-25D, shuttle heritage) burning LH2 & LOX for 500 seconds.
@@smh95826 ok, thx for the info
Ahh, I love the smell of burning money in the morning.
CO2 and Water? That’s Capp 🧢
First
"109 views"