Rationality includes a predefined goal. Maybe even under the aspect of efficiency. Critical thinking is a way of reviewing anything without a certain outcome in mind.
"maybe even under the aspect of efficiency" Efficiency it's implied on rationality. Other ways you would be the one saying 'well...' when something it's obviously considered 'irrational'. That way of thinking it's like 'antihuman'
Critical thinking is not just the ability to do that, but to actually do that. If you have the ability to question and analyze one of your beliefs, but choose not to, you're not really thinking critically.
Plot twist they enjoyed debating where to go vastly more than actually going anywhere so their behavior was rational all along and they where not thinking critically about their stated goals.
Not if it is fun to the people doing it or if it serves some other purpose like developing language skills or maybe it is rational to one person in the debate and not another because one is enjoying annoying the other. To really know if something is irrational you have to know the desires of the people involved and then apply logic to see if the behavior is consistent with the desires. Claiming the desires of people are right or wrong is not an argument about rationality but simply asserting dominance over other people.
Think more as how I appreciated SOCIAL DISTANCE technique as one of the positive effects of not only in COVID - 19 protocol but for preventing of other harmful diseases or viruses Vs Think more as TEACHER who have to try the alternative way to keep in touch with students especially the one who have to face their examination during Pandemic
in this case rationality kinda means pragmatism, right? their critical thinking was not bounded by a pragmatic sense of how long they should deliberate before the process would be moot...
That’s what a I thought as well. Don’t think pragmatism = rationality. Fire sure, pragmatism is an element of it, but, is not the whole lot. I think this probably leads down to the whole picture scout mindset.
To me critical is from the begining, derived from how the critic's work. Rational, because it is not rational to analize something that much that you go against your primary intentions that leads You to analize it in the first place.
I agree with you. Sound critical thinking would have made appropriate use of satisficing - finding an option that is good enough - within a time frame that would have enabled them to get to a good enough restaurant before it closed. They were both irrational and deficient in their critical thinking.
I'd say critical thinking is a subset of rationality, synonymous with skepticism. One can be skeptical and not necessarily rational. Rational means striving to attain the most accurate view of reality possible. Critical thinking / skepticism means investigating claims and reevaluating beliefs to better ensure they are accurate, instead of just believing whatever you hear. That's how I view the terms at least. Also good to see another video from you Julia.
I see it the other way around to you. I see rationality as an intellectual tool used in critical thinking. In the example Julia gives, rationality wasn't employed effectively. It may have been employed on the small scale for the sub goals for the ultimate goal of making the restaurant decision, but rationality wasn't used on the larger scale on the ultimate goal of achieving a restaurant decision within time limits.
Andrew McAuliffe I agree with All the great comments here. Everyone keeps going around in circles with similar examples of this Cognitive process which I feel are all helpful to our understanding. =)
Andrew McAuliffe I see epistemic rationality as the principle of taking all available information into account prior to making a decision or reaching a conclusion (meaning you're not leaving anything out due to negligence or bias). In this example, I would say the time it takes to analyze all of the information and the limit of time available to complete the task were factors left out of the equation, so in a sense it was not a rational course of action. Thats something I find funny about people who criticize rational decision-making - you have to account for *all* of the available information, including the time it takes to process it all! Sometimes, an incomplete estimate with a spice of uncertainty is the best possible course.
The way I see it: one being wise; the other smart. I'm going to refrain from the 'quick, someone needs to clone this women' comment. Brilliant as usual, Julia.
@@MyOnlyFarph you mean to say _rationality,_ is a subset of critical thinking? ..as your following sentence, “one can be skeptical and not necessarily rational,” seems to indicate.
Rationality simply refers to thinking in "inferential chains"--in other words, thinking along the lines of how formal logic works: If P then Q. P. Therefore Q. Critical thinking refers to analyzing something, especially claims that someone is making, where you're looking for errors/fallacies they might have made, unanalyzed/unrealized assumptions, and so on.
Hmm, it gives a nice example of a difference but it was rational in an epistemic way - based on the goal being concluding the best restaurant, period (with no further goals or restrictions, like available time). However, it was indeed not instrumentally rational - based on the goal of concluding the best restaurant _and_ within a certain time-limit, so they could actually eat there that night. So, you could say that rationality (colloquially used) is practical (goal-oriented) and critical thinking is epistemological and analytical.
Why is there critical thinking but a lack of rationality in the restaurant choice example, and not vice-versa? It seems when rationality lacks pragmatism or utilitarianism then you call it critical thinking, but this conclusion seems irrational.
Sound critical thinking would have made appropriate use of satisficing - finding an option that is good enough - within a time frame that would have enabled them to get to a good enough restaurant before it closed. They were both irrational and deficient in their critical thinking.
I'm so pleased you are back! Finding your 'What is Rationality' video substantially changed my life--providing the tipping point that helped me go from vaguely transitioning from Christianity into a sort of deism, to embracing atheism. Your video that helped me 'steep my mind' in Bayes Rule, helped me later explain my decision to my family in such a way that half of them were able to make the break as well. Certainly Hitchens, Dawkins, and Harris helped after the fact, but it was your videos I found first. I cannot fully articulate how much lighter and less stressful my life became when I woke up to reality. Thank you and welcome back! p.s., I also enjoyed this video and the analogy. I will be shamelessly stealing it.
mattock7 "After the death of Hitchens, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (who was intended to attend the original occasion where the term was coined) was described as the "fourth horse-woman" of the non-Apocalypse." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Atheism
Interesting example. The rationality add-on would be to consider the time to effectively do the activity (go to eay) vs the amount of time left in the evening.
Think more the hardest way as Table Data tag tag where it is used to specify data in a cell of a table under each heading Vs Think more the hardest way as how the text in this is normal and left alligned
I’d say your example is just different framing of the problem and rules of the game. One that doesn’t take in to account time and one that does. I’d say critical thinking is a tool to derive rational decisions.
The brilliant Julia Galef should make more videos like this, just love them. I say that as we, as people, need to slow down and think more carefully that run around chasing shadows and ghosts.. Do I say that as rational, critical or emotionally? Good question..
Hey Julia. Great videos as always, but I do have a question and some general comments. In the rational and skeptical circles why is it that I never hear the names Dr. Richard Paul and Dr. Linda Elder? Both have been collaborating on the concept of critical thinking for over 30 years. When I made my journey to be a more rational person about 4 years ago I started looking around at different people’s perspective on how to be more rational and logical and what these terms even mean. In my opinion the term "critical thinking" as used by Dr. Paul and Dr. Elder captures what it means to be rational the best. So in a very brief, rough, nutshell I would like to take a stab at the relationship between critical thinking and rationality. Critical thinking is the process of analyzing and evaluating your thinking with the view of improving the decisions you make. Rational is what you call someone who is using this process. I wouldn’t say the person in your example is using very good critical thinking skills because they haven’t successfully considered the standard of significance. Meaning at some point they should have asked themselves "How long should I deliberate on this issue before making a decision?" Anyways I’m a big fan of you and all the other big names pushing for reason and keep on keepin on sister haha
For me, Rationality is a mode of objective weighing and comparison (ratio). Critical thinking is the skill of identifying the key concepts and relationships from a situation or work. Critical thinking is part of the tool'kit of ratiinality. Thank you for your nice concise content.
I've always understood "rational" as trusting logic and facts over emotions and wishful thinking, when making decisions. Critical thinking requires logical patterns of thought and the examination of the available evidence. As far as I understand, being rational means that you trust your critical thinking over your emotional impulses. I'm sure you know that these two patterns of thought can be traced to different areas of the brain, and having a "gut feeling" feels very different from carefully weighing the options. We all use both systems for making decisions, when it's appropriate and when it's not. In your example, going with the gut would have been the right option. However, I think a more typical example would be spending an afternoon reading reviews and choosing what camera you'd like to buy, then going to the store and buying something else because one of the salesmen persuaded you, only to come home and regret your purchase. Critical thinking is too scarce to complain about it's occasional abuse, as in your example.
Think more the hardest way as KILOGRAM and Kilowatt are two measurements of two different SI unit. If 1000 g is equal to 1KG, then how many Kilowatt that can be equal to 1 Watt? Vs Think more the hardest way as LOPA and Malta are two different destination points of a local cab, but Ado, Kobe, and Vino are three different places to be passing through from Lopa to Malta. If Ado is 2.5KM away from Lopa, 3.5 KM away from Kobe and Kobe is 3.4KM from Malta, What is the distance from Lopa to Malta?
Sounds like the balance between finding optimum choice and finding choice efficiently. It may be the same as choose a solution that takes years to get exact answer or choose a solution that takes short time to get approximated answer.
I think that's A difference between rationality and critical thinking, but there's multiple differences and commonalities. The two are essentially synonyms, but rationality has more emphasis on following axioms to logical conclusion, whereas critical thinking has more emphasis on choosing reasonable axioms.
When you say they used critical thinking, you actually mean they did the entire time, meaning they where in a state of constant questioning. One can use critical thinking and still find fulfillment. When you say rationality in this case, you must mean that they would have considered the option of the close times of the restaurants as well. At what point is critical thinking restricted to not asking questions about closing times?
Most of the time when you read a critique opening ours is not a main subjet such as menu, ambient, service etc. Opening ours, adress etc are more ítems listed aside.
I agree with you. Sound critical thinking would have made appropriate use of satisficing - finding an option that is good enough - within a time frame that would have enabled them to get to a good enough restaurant before it closed. They were both irrational and deficient in their critical thinking.
Think more the hardest way as how a cut away is when the visual not part to a scene is overlaid Vs Think more the hardest way as how a Fade is a transition that includes a gradual, progressive transformation from a full image to black
If meaning is use, then words like critical thinking and rationality are just how people use them. Of course, people even fuck up words that have clear meanings determined by the objects the words are used to refer to ... sadly, CT and R are terms that do not refer to easy-to-identify public objects.
Think more the hardest way as the first three lights, such as key, fill and back - are sometimes referred to as three point lighting Vs Think more the Hardest way as at least fourth light source is usually aimed at the background behind the actor to illuminate the setting
Critical thinking seems to be about a method to dissect patterns and unravel accessible true statements and logical relationships between them. But ultimately, rationality seems to be about making a decision about something (going to such and such restaurant or believing in something) by taking the most "logical" path (in fact, a rationalist will always try to maximize utility). Pascal's wager was rational for instance.
Think more the hardest way as tag which is used to display the text in italic style... Vs Think more the hardest way as tag which is used to underline the text
Think more the hardest way as how in *Structure of Control Flow the traditional meaning of structured programming is taken in following a systematic flow of control throughout the program* Vs Think more the hardest way as how *Structuring of Control Flow can be achieved by implementing all processing requirements using combinations of *Sequence (steps one after the other), Selection (Choose one out of two/many), Iteration (repeat steps many times)*
Think more the hardest way with last content after 'Making a Documentary' is 'Film Review and Trends' Vs Think more the Hardest way as how Films become 'hits' or 'flops' in the box office according to the audience support
Think more the hardest way as how *If we take an example such as Version 4.5 Turbo C++, running under Windows on an IBM-compatible personal computer and how to enter Turbo C++, open the Turbo C++ group and then click the Turbo C++ icon and how this will result in the near-empty window* Vs Think more the hardest way as why *Usually a pointing device, such as a mouse, is used to select a menu item which is accomplished by moving the cursor over the desired item and then "clicking" on the "item"*
Think more not to be fool as a person who wait or depend from others for foods or drinks... Vs Think more but as a person who knows how to remain calm even when storms hit from all sides of life
Think more the hardest way as certain communities that are known for their distinct genres of folk art forms Vs Think more the hardest way as the wisdom and wit of the rural folk have been expressed through riddles, proverbs, folks saying and couplets..
Think more the hardest way with why the main function in Int Main() is always followed by a pair of parenthesis() Vs Think more the hardest way as why Int main is a Function Declaration
Think more as wise as possible by how focussing on good side of life could always be a blessing to self... Vs Think more as wise as how not to fall even when so much offering my eyes being tempted
would a more simpler example of critical thinking be, everyone is going to the new swanky restaurant in town, but it's actually overly expensive, and on review the food is bad so the critical thinker, using independent thought (key element) decides not to go there but to the small restaurant with a good food review and relative prices, this seems to also include rational thinking.
Think more as wise as possible like a heart that knowing I'm still in the right track... Vs Think more as wise as possible especially if you're honest just like me, being not ashamed of pleading myself before myself over and over again even if the person who read this comment wasn't you
. . . but but but it is logical to also consider the hours during which the restaurants are open, and they should have utilized a holiday, when these restaurants are closed, to generate these lists for debate and deliberation, so that they become better prepared later.
Think more the Hardest way as how the Imagery and design of Caligari further enhances the anxiety through the use of dark eerie dark eerie shadows Vs Think more the Hardest way as how the film's dramatic effects produce motifs of claustrophobia and paranoia
Think more the Hardest way when I know humanity isn't always in the form of entertainingly helping each other, charitying other, care for other... Vs Think more the Hardest way as wise as how I see the opposite reflection when I personally perform one such example of these humility contents
Think more the hardest way as *Relative URL* which located a resource using an absolute URL as a starting point and how it consists only the path and the resource but not the server or the scheme..... Vs Think more the hardest way as *Absolute URL* which contains all the information necessary to locate a resource and how it uses scheme, server, Path and resource...
Think more the hardest way as how People communicate with each other in various social interactions, but at that time, they are in the domain of mass communication as well... Vs Think more the hardest way as why it is by using the means of mass communication that one can reach the whole society
Interesting analogy but I'm not sure I agree with you, at least based on the content of this video. In so far as the analogy goes it seems to exclude the time constraint of "going out for dinner tonight" in the build up to the evaluation. There is no reason why that could not have been a piece of information used to constrain the time taken in making the evaluation. The way I see it is that rationality, or the act/quality of being rational, is to do things in such a way that they be considered logical. I.e.: they conform to accepted logical axioms. Critical thinking can be described as a process of evaluation that one engages in in order to make a judgement. I.e.: the acquisition and consideration of information with respect to certain goals or questions. If an evaluation is not logical (rational) you may draw incorrect conclusion/s, or by chance draw correct conclusion/s but with no valid and/or sound reason/s for how you got there. In my view, critical thinking is a rational (or logical)l analysis of some set of information while rationality is a term we use to describe someone/something being rational. Why engage in an evaluation that consumes time and energy if you are not wanting to arrive at the correct, or at the very least the best possible conclusion?
Think more as wise with 10-15 minutes timeless stretch Vs Think more as wise as possible the hardest way of how I get into it after many hardest parts of examining myself
Think more the hardest way as how according to Westley and MacLean's scheme of things, *the receiver of the message gets what the communicator wants him/her to receive.. Vs Think more the hardest way as why Westley and MacLean argued that mass media has expanded our world so much that we by ourselves cannot obtain all the information required by us and it is here *that the role of mass media and journalists appears as they provide the necessary orientation* .
Think more yet not to be fool by somebody else's abilities through his/her career.. Vs Think more but to rationalise what I'm worth for infront of everyone
I think rationality is a method or technique which you combine with an ideology or goal (having a good time at a restaurant), whereas critical thinking is already kind of an ideology. You apply rationality to whatever you need in order to achieve your goal, whereas you apply critical thinking to everything you possibly can (otherwise it's not critical thinking).
An elegant illustration for encapsulating her point. However, I proffer that these two entities (rationality and critical thinking) can be exchanged in this illustration. Certainly the point made that it's possible with critical thinking alone to over-focus to the point of losing sight of the necessary overall picture, can also interpreted as to potentially apply to any rational process, up to an including rationality itself. But the argument being subtly interwoven into this illustration is the assertion that rationality, being the bigger picture itself, can never allow such oversights. And therefore, to rephrase this, rationality is an ideal by way of definition, such that when properly followed can never unwittingly stumble into unwitting error. Thus to err is to fail to be rational. And to fail to be rational is to err. In other words, rationality has no limitations to it. However this is a kind of circular reasoning, which prompts me to realize the deity-like absoluteness which rationalists ascribe to rationality; as though it is something transcendental and above any (otherwise human) limitation. Yes, there is some critical thinking happening here. But at least by the circular argument derived from the illustration in this video, it seems as though the speaker's position is such that there is no other lens through which anyone who values rationality must view it.
So, the intense, exhaustive, contemplation (itself) on a specific question is demonstrative of critical thinking, but the disregard for the proportionality and the end result are demonstrative of the rationality (or, rather, the lack thereof more precisely). Moral: Don’t leave all the critical thinking to irrational people, perhaps?
I've noticed that most models of rationality rely on the assumption that some choices or some actions have more value than others. (For example, economists assign value to options based on their "utility", making it the economic unit of value.) It seems to me that the important question is not, at root, what action is or is not "rational" per se, nor is it about which choice has more value, but it centers around the very idea of value itself. Value, itself, is not rational. The value of an object or an action is in the future; namely, how the object or action affects the chooser subsequent to the choice being made. That is to say, the rational chooser is attempting to predict the future value of that object or action, and since the future hasn't happened yet at the point of choosing, that prediction can only be made using historical data and information. That sifting of historical data and information, that is the act of critical thinking. The actual necessity of predicting future value, or the necessity of critical thinking, that is rationality. Visualize it this way: a rock is not in need of making choices, because it exists at the whim of outside forces, but a fly has internal forces and motivations behind its behaviors. If the fly simply moves around aimlessly, choosing objects and actions at random, then it is no more rational than the rock, because the results of its behaviors are indistinguishable from that of the rock. But if the fly does make determined choices in its motion based on perceived value, then it is, as I explained above, attempting to predict the result of its choices, and at that point the fly is acting rationally. So the distinction between irrational and rational behavior is like that of the rock and the random fly, whose behavior is no wiser than the rock, versus the fly that is making valued choices. That's rationality. Critical thinking, on the other hand, is the actual process by which said fly would go about selecting options based on perceived value; therefore, critical thinking is the analytical processing of historical data for the purpose of acting rationally. Now, imagine a hammer and a nail. Rationality is the act of striking the nail more often than not (as opposed to striking the nail no more or less than would be expected by random chance), and critical thinking is the method by which the hammer achieves greater and greater accuracy of striking that nail.
***** Again, you're making the mistake of presuming what it means to value something. Nothing has intrinsic value. Indeed, it could even be said that nothing actually has a value until an animated being is motivated to acknowledge its existence. That is to say, we imbue something with value simply by designating it as a selectable option. The act (choice), itself, defines the quality (value), and the process (rationality) prescribes the method of selection (critical thinking).
Tal Moore Intrinsic Value lets see.... Water, Food, Air. No Motivation to Acknowledge there Existence Needed when Biological Mechanisms Automatically/Naturally take care of that. Life would not exist without them. You have No Choice in this matter if You want to be in front of your computer right now reading this. What is the point of Life if Death is Equal in Value? I'm pretty sure you Value Life over Death Right? In Essence, We Value Life for Any of This to even be happening. To Value Death more is an Illogical premise because you will need to experience Life First to even be able to consider this notion. "Nothing has intrinsic value" Unless You where able to choose to be Born, Your Life is Intrinsically Valuable and Important for You to be able to Experience that Mind of yours. ;-))
Think more the hardest way as how my mood react when Peshawar city scenic video is played with respect to how my mind respond when Paris landscape video is shown Vs Think more the hardest way as ears that learn how to bring the naturally captured sound with sound effects in any particular situations
Think more as wise as how I asked one relative on Saturday that I met at funeral house about whether she's still keeping an aquarium or not at home since the last time I visited her home a decade ago.... Vs Think more the hardest way as wise as how I figured out it is impossible nowadays to justify with the extension relatively people such as the one who comes out from other grannies, or grand ucles etc
Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as wise as what that makes me having you in my mind all the time... Vs Think more even I pretend like I'm okay to not let anyone realised you've got me since 17 years ago
Think more the Hardest way as how the speed required for preparing a news bulletin that has many stories translated from other languages requires a very different training of translators.. Vs Think more the hardest way as how the Translations are also required many a time in radio features when we take the sound bites of people in various languages that are not the language of feature to be broadcasted from the radio station...
Think more the Quickest Intuitively way since the last comment, somewhere between 3600-7200 seconds ago again with respect to things I spared my time with, such as having my 3rd meal in 2½ tiny plates of cool rice, a piece of tiny fried fish, in addition with 2 cups of tea, a cup of horlick, helping to cut a ½Kg of pork and cooked it as someone who bought told me to do so, having a tasting bite to a piece of 1½cooked sliced piece of pork, Washing and cooking a 3/4 or bazaar rice to paddy rice, feeding the pigs with cooked spoiled pumpkins I cutted and cooked today's morning, a little updated visit to a 100-150m nearby roadside grocery store, having a Rs 15 of three items of spicy packaged food with onion I picked from kitchen, a ⅛ portion of bitter lemon I snatched from garden, few 4-5 pieces of tiny local coriander leaves, a dip of two types of salt, few drops of cooked oil from leftover refine oil bottle, a little portion of super hot chili powder, few portion of muri, letting someone to have a little portion of what I mixed, moment when there's no bottle pack refined cooking oil anymore as I tried to go back to same grocery store to buy for kitchen needs, a moment of how I spared my time with remaining 40% of 3GB Internet data-pack on smartphone screen etc Vs Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as remaining 12480 seconds of Wednesday here and remaining 52280 seconds of Wednesday there with respect to how my focussingly concentration point of view goes through out the day in 25200 seconds from 10:40 AM till 05:40 PM, and the wisest thing after all how I shouldn't be fool way always anyway no matter what again
Think more the hardest way with two self clicked photos I recently took today in the morning... Vs Think more the hardest way as wise as how I didn't let others deceive my mind both in reality as well as in virtuality
Think more as wise as how much minutes it take to step out from my house to neighbour house, from my settlement resident place to other neighbouring villages, towns, cities by vehicles or by any means of transportation etc... Vs Think more as wise as possible with kb/s instead of km/hour
Think more the Hardest way as the times of number of passerby passengering flights that passed through since the last aviation related newday updating... Vs Think more the hardest way as how I stopped taking pictures of closed ground flying passerby flights which appeared big from a smartphone screen capture
Think more as wise as possible to fool not by background noises I heard from father voice when I talked to him through Cellphone recently... Vs Think more the hardest way to fool not by intentionally dropped umbrella
Think more the hardest way as characteristics of various script formats for feature films, non-fiction films, Television news and programmes... Vs Think more the Hardest way as why there are various script formats to suit different requirements such as a report article or news feature..
Think more the Hardest way as wise as possible like how I still not in a relationship, although how closeness my personal attachment to you virtually.... Vs Think more the Hardest way as wise as how I'm happy to remove away myself from you, when you think I am wrong by being honestly and frankly
Think more the hardest way with why there are still selfishness in a way that I honestly communicated to you Vs Think more the hardest way with why I still find out this process isn't still helpful to me, although it is helpful for many
Think more the hardest way how we should remember, it's not just about including all of these different hot types in sequence, but about anticipating which questions our audience will be wondering and answering Vs Think more the Hardest way why usage of camera in films required us to deal with Camera movements in TV broadcasting as well as Camera angles in Photo journalism
Think more the hardest way of how I understand myself, by improving my self reliant thoughts though what I openly mentioned to anyone included you sounds guilty... Vs Think more just as wise as how I shouldn't let those bad habits scenes could spoil my way of thinking
Think more the wisest way *if someone wants to know what's happening behind the scenes, do they ask us?* Vs Think more the wisest way as how *do we address the desire of others for us to be open and to share relevant information?*
My take away was that they were being rational, by brutely applying known mathematical theory to a trivial problem but weren't doing critical thinking. I reached the opposite conclusion as you based on this example.
Think more the Hardest way as how non contracted forms are used where one is supposed to emphasize where they sound more authentic and forcible Vs Think more the Hardest way as how a simple sentence has only one subject and one predicate
Think more the Hardest way as how the style sheets or style books of various newspapers give specific instructions to their journalists on the usage of quotations and how the Associated Press Stylebook, for example, says'Never altequotations even to correct minor grammatical errors or word usage. Vs Think more the hardest way as one example of the use of quotation in the news story is how Obama's 'embtace' of India to leap in economic ties according to US-Indo Asian News Services dated Washington, January 15, 2012
Think more as wise as how not to be fool by those who still misunderstood me... Vs Think more as wise as what if I don't have a word, but repeatedly harm myself with unhealthy imagery intuition, though cost controlly, convergently, virtually etc
Think more the hardest way with how Internet enabled us to do stuffs such as Communication (email)chat/social networking), Searching Information, Shopping, Banking, Business, Education, Entertainment.. Vs Think more the hardest way with some major issues attached to extensive use of the Internet such as Lack of Security, Spam, Virus, Cyberterrorism
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I shouldn't be fool by those who tried to break my patterns... Vs Think more even how wise they go with your instructions
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I managed to complete commenting all your 46 videos before I work on what's that strike my mind... Vs Think more the hardest way as wise as how I respect my own rules when abiding under somebody else's rules is like how I imprison myself
Think more the quickest intuitively way deep as wise as how I know my worries will soon be washed away if those who understand my situations refers to the context of what I lived everyday... Vs Think more the quickest intuitively way deep as wise as how I know the joy of setting my mind in peace and serenity if I would always make sure you understand my current situation at a moment that I justified with usual customs, family, friends, workplace etc
Think more from the moment I took a back seat riding going to neighbouring village west while youngest brother drive along with mother, the neighbours and relatives that I met in the funeral house, the identified/unidentified people whom I handshaked with, the moment I took a stare at a death person in casket for twice, the amount of bank notes that mother handling to me and leave it in casket with a last wish of his blessing, while his wife, family, recognised/unrecognised children/grandchildren had a conversation with mother, the plastic cup of tea and a little amount of rice... Vs Think more the hardest way when I rationalised what I perceived the stuffs I dealt in virtuality with the stuff I dealt in reality
Think more the hardest way as Google map that should be regularly update on Internet, as reality of latest captured Google mapping images keep on changing Vs Think more the hardest way as different in Hospitalization from Modern context as compared to Ancient way of Medicinal practice
Think more the Hardest way till 05:33 PM of a day... Vs Think more as wise with three signalling traffic lights colour, although in an Indian state where I lived street traffic signals are still considering non mandatory by many
Think more the hardest way of how I secretly talked to you like the way I shared my deepest point of view on how I rationalised my Repeatable argument... Vs Think more the Hardest way as wise as how I see it's helpless for me to change a person I secretly but commitedly commenting everyday
Rationality includes a predefined goal. Maybe even under the aspect of efficiency.
Critical thinking is a way of reviewing anything without a certain outcome in mind.
***** Thank you!
"maybe even under the aspect of efficiency"
Efficiency it's implied on rationality.
Other ways you would be the one saying 'well...' when something it's obviously considered 'irrational'.
That way of thinking it's like 'antihuman'
Rationality: the ability to use knowledge to attain goals.
Critical thinking: analysing and evaluating claims.
Critical thinking is not just the ability to do that, but to actually do that. If you have the ability to question and analyze one of your beliefs, but choose not to, you're not really thinking critically.
@@chandir7752 fair point. Comment amended
Plot twist they enjoyed debating where to go vastly more than actually going anywhere so their behavior was rational all along and they where not thinking critically about their stated goals.
It's irrational to debate on where to eat if they never planned on doing so
Not if it is fun to the people doing it or if it serves some other purpose like developing language skills or maybe it is rational to one person in the debate and not another because one is enjoying annoying the other. To really know if something is irrational you have to know the desires of the people involved and then apply logic to see if the behavior is consistent with the desires. Claiming the desires of people are right or wrong is not an argument about rationality but simply asserting dominance over other people.
Think more as how I appreciated SOCIAL DISTANCE technique as one of the positive effects of not only in COVID - 19 protocol but for preventing of other harmful diseases or viruses
Vs
Think more as TEACHER who have to try the alternative way to keep in touch with students especially the one who have to face their examination during Pandemic
in this case rationality kinda means pragmatism, right? their critical thinking was not bounded by a pragmatic sense of how long they should deliberate before the process would be moot...
That’s what a I thought as well. Don’t think pragmatism = rationality. Fire sure, pragmatism is an element of it, but, is not the whole lot. I think this probably leads down to the whole picture scout mindset.
I don't agree with this. They were LACKING in critical thinking ... they didn't think critically about how much time they spent debating.
Yes but that wasn't the subject of the discussion/thought.
To me critical is from the begining, derived from how the critic's work. Rational, because it is not rational to analize something that much that you go against your primary intentions that leads You to analize it in the first place.
I agree with you. Sound critical thinking would have made appropriate use of satisficing - finding an option that is good enough - within a time frame that would have enabled them to get to a good enough restaurant before it closed. They were both irrational and deficient in their critical thinking.
I'd say critical thinking is a subset of rationality, synonymous with skepticism. One can be skeptical and not necessarily rational. Rational means striving to attain the most accurate view of reality possible. Critical thinking / skepticism means investigating claims and reevaluating beliefs to better ensure they are accurate, instead of just believing whatever you hear. That's how I view the terms at least.
Also good to see another video from you Julia.
I see it the other way around to you. I see rationality as an intellectual tool used in critical thinking. In the example Julia gives, rationality wasn't employed effectively. It may have been employed on the small scale for the sub goals for the ultimate goal of making the restaurant decision, but rationality wasn't used on the larger scale on the ultimate goal of achieving a restaurant decision within time limits.
Andrew McAuliffe I agree with All the great comments here. Everyone keeps going around in circles with similar examples of this Cognitive process which I feel are all helpful to our understanding. =)
Andrew McAuliffe I see epistemic rationality as the principle of taking all available information into account prior to making a decision or reaching a conclusion (meaning you're not leaving anything out due to negligence or bias). In this example, I would say the time it takes to analyze all of the information and the limit of time available to complete the task were factors left out of the equation, so in a sense it was not a rational course of action.
Thats something I find funny about people who criticize rational decision-making - you have to account for *all* of the available information, including the time it takes to process it all! Sometimes, an incomplete estimate with a spice of uncertainty is the best possible course.
The way I see it: one being wise; the other smart. I'm going to refrain from the 'quick, someone needs to clone this women' comment. Brilliant as usual, Julia.
@@MyOnlyFarph you mean to say _rationality,_ is a subset of critical thinking? ..as your following sentence, “one can be skeptical and not necessarily rational,” seems to indicate.
Rationality simply refers to thinking in "inferential chains"--in other words, thinking along the lines of how formal logic works: If P then Q. P. Therefore Q.
Critical thinking refers to analyzing something, especially claims that someone is making, where you're looking for errors/fallacies they might have made, unanalyzed/unrealized assumptions, and so on.
Why can't I have more friends like you. 😌 Well put.
Hmm, it gives a nice example of a difference but
it was rational in an epistemic way - based on the goal being concluding the best restaurant, period (with no further goals or restrictions, like available time).
However, it was indeed not instrumentally rational - based on the goal of concluding the best restaurant _and_ within a certain time-limit, so they could actually eat there that night.
So, you could say that rationality (colloquially used) is practical (goal-oriented)
and critical thinking is epistemological and analytical.
Why is there critical thinking but a lack of rationality in the restaurant choice example, and not vice-versa? It seems when rationality lacks pragmatism or utilitarianism then you call it critical thinking, but this conclusion seems irrational.
Sound critical thinking would have made appropriate use of satisficing - finding an option that is good enough - within a time frame that would have enabled them to get to a good enough restaurant before it closed. They were both irrational and deficient in their critical thinking.
I'm so pleased you are back! Finding your 'What is Rationality' video substantially changed my life--providing the tipping point that helped me go from vaguely transitioning from Christianity into a sort of deism, to embracing atheism. Your video that helped me 'steep my mind' in Bayes Rule, helped me later explain my decision to my family in such a way that half of them were able to make the break as well. Certainly Hitchens, Dawkins, and Harris helped after the fact, but it was your videos I found first. I cannot fully articulate how much lighter and less stressful my life became when I woke up to reality.
Thank you and welcome back!
p.s., I also enjoyed this video and the analogy. I will be shamelessly stealing it.
mattock7 Whoa, awesome! Very pleased I beat the Horsemen to the punch. :) Thanks for letting me know.
Who would be a good fourth? Maher?
mattock7 "After the death of Hitchens, Ayaan Hirsi Ali (who was intended to attend the original occasion where the term was coined) was described as the "fourth horse-woman" of the non-Apocalypse." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Atheism
Grant T B had never heard of Daniel Dennett either, so I appreciate the the info and the link.
mattock7 Glad to help! Dennett is amazing.
I like it! Please post videos more often. :)
Interesting example. The rationality add-on would be to consider the time to effectively do the activity (go to eay) vs the amount of time left in the evening.
Think more the hardest way as Table Data tag tag where it is used to specify data in a cell of a table under each heading
Vs
Think more the hardest way as how the text in this is normal and left alligned
I’d say your example is just different framing of the problem and rules of the game. One that doesn’t take in to account time and one that does. I’d say critical thinking is a tool to derive rational decisions.
The brilliant Julia Galef should make more videos like this, just love them. I say that as we, as people, need to slow down and think more carefully that run around chasing shadows and ghosts.. Do I say that as rational, critical or emotionally? Good question..
Mike Downes Sounds like they All qualify in today's Crazy World ...
Hey Julia. Great videos as always, but I do have a question and some general comments. In the rational and skeptical circles why is it that I never hear the names Dr. Richard Paul and Dr. Linda Elder? Both have been collaborating on the concept of critical thinking for over 30 years. When I made my journey to be a more rational person about 4 years ago I started looking around at different people’s perspective on how to be more rational and logical and what these terms even mean. In my opinion the term "critical thinking" as used by Dr. Paul and Dr. Elder captures what it means to be rational the best. So in a very brief, rough, nutshell I would like to take a stab at the relationship between critical thinking and rationality. Critical thinking is the process of analyzing and evaluating your thinking with the view of improving the decisions you make. Rational is what you call someone who is using this process. I wouldn’t say the person in your example is using very good critical thinking skills because they haven’t successfully considered the standard of significance. Meaning at some point they should have asked themselves "How long should I deliberate on this issue before making a decision?" Anyways I’m a big fan of you and all the other big names pushing for reason and keep on keepin on sister haha
For me, Rationality is a mode of objective weighing and comparison (ratio).
Critical thinking is the skill of identifying the key concepts and relationships from a situation or work.
Critical thinking is part of the tool'kit of ratiinality.
Thank you for your nice concise content.
I've always understood "rational" as trusting logic and facts over emotions and wishful thinking, when making decisions. Critical thinking requires logical patterns of thought and the examination of the available evidence. As far as I understand, being rational means that you trust your critical thinking over your emotional impulses. I'm sure you know that these two patterns of thought can be traced to different areas of the brain, and having a "gut feeling" feels very different from carefully weighing the options. We all use both systems for making decisions, when it's appropriate and when it's not. In your example, going with the gut would have been the right option. However, I think a more typical example would be spending an afternoon reading reviews and choosing what camera you'd like to buy, then going to the store and buying something else because one of the salesmen persuaded you, only to come home and regret your purchase. Critical thinking is too scarce to complain about it's occasional abuse, as in your example.
Think more the hardest way as KILOGRAM and Kilowatt are two measurements of two different SI unit. If 1000 g is equal to 1KG, then how many Kilowatt that can be equal to 1 Watt?
Vs
Think more the hardest way as LOPA and Malta are two different destination points of a local cab, but Ado, Kobe, and Vino are three different places to be passing through from Lopa to Malta. If Ado is 2.5KM away from Lopa, 3.5 KM away from Kobe and Kobe is 3.4KM from Malta, What is the distance from Lopa to Malta?
Sounds like the balance between finding optimum choice and finding choice efficiently. It may be the same as choose a solution that takes years to get exact answer or choose a solution that takes short time to get approximated answer.
I think that's A difference between rationality and critical thinking, but there's multiple differences and commonalities.
The two are essentially synonyms, but rationality has more emphasis on following axioms to logical conclusion, whereas critical thinking has more emphasis on choosing reasonable axioms.
When you say they used critical thinking, you actually mean they did the entire time, meaning they where in a state of constant questioning. One can use critical thinking and still find fulfillment.
When you say rationality in this case, you must mean that they would have considered the option of the close times of the restaurants as well.
At what point is critical thinking restricted to not asking questions about closing times?
Most of the time when you read a critique opening ours is not a main subjet such as menu, ambient, service etc. Opening ours, adress etc are more ítems listed aside.
I agree with you. Sound critical thinking would have made appropriate use of satisficing - finding an option that is good enough - within a time frame that would have enabled them to get to a good enough restaurant before it closed. They were both irrational and deficient in their critical thinking.
I am a very analytical thinker. I wonder if this is why I trend more feminine in thinking with testing?
Thanks Julia! :D
Think more the hardest way as how a cut away is when the visual not part to a scene is overlaid
Vs
Think more the hardest way as how a Fade is a transition that includes a gradual, progressive transformation from a full image to black
If meaning is use, then words like critical thinking and rationality are just how people use them. Of course, people even fuck up words that have clear meanings determined by the objects the words are used to refer to ... sadly, CT and R are terms that do not refer to easy-to-identify public objects.
Wonderful example, Julia Galef, as usual! ;)
Think more the hardest way as the first three lights, such as key, fill and back - are sometimes referred to as three point lighting
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as at least fourth light source is usually aimed at the background behind the actor to illuminate the setting
Critical thinking seems to be about a method to dissect patterns and unravel accessible true statements and logical relationships between them. But ultimately, rationality seems to be about making a decision about something (going to such and such restaurant or believing in something) by taking the most "logical" path (in fact, a rationalist will always try to maximize utility). Pascal's wager was rational for instance.
Awesome as always.
I learned a lot from this video not just about rationality but also about the use of facial expressions for effective communication ⚛️
Think more the hardest way as tag which is used to display the text in italic style...
Vs
Think more the hardest way as tag which is used to underline the text
Think more the hardest way as how in *Structure of Control Flow the traditional meaning of structured programming is taken in following a systematic flow of control throughout the program*
Vs
Think more the hardest way as how *Structuring of Control Flow can be achieved by implementing all processing requirements using combinations of *Sequence (steps one after the other), Selection (Choose one out of two/many), Iteration (repeat steps many times)*
Think more the hardest way with last content after 'Making a Documentary' is 'Film Review and Trends'
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as how Films become 'hits' or 'flops' in the box office according to the audience support
Think more the hardest way as how *If we take an example such as Version 4.5 Turbo C++, running under Windows on an IBM-compatible personal computer and how to enter Turbo C++, open the Turbo
C++ group and then click the Turbo C++ icon and how this will result in the near-empty window*
Vs
Think more the hardest way as why *Usually a pointing device, such as a mouse, is used to select a menu item which is accomplished by moving the cursor over the desired item and then "clicking" on the "item"*
Think more not to be fool as a person who wait or depend from others for foods or drinks...
Vs
Think more but as a person who knows how to remain calm even when storms hit from all sides of life
Think more the hardest way as certain communities that are known for their distinct genres of folk art forms
Vs
Think more the hardest way as the wisdom and wit of the rural folk have been expressed through riddles, proverbs, folks saying and couplets..
Think more the hardest way with why the main function in Int Main() is always followed by a pair of parenthesis()
Vs
Think more the hardest way as why Int main is a Function Declaration
Thanks for knowledge. ...☺
Your example is simple and perfect.
Think more as wise as possible by how focussing on good side of life could always be a blessing to self...
Vs
Think more as wise as how not to fall even when so much offering my eyes being tempted
would a more simpler example of critical thinking be, everyone is going to the new swanky restaurant in town, but it's actually overly expensive, and on review the food is bad so the critical thinker, using independent thought (key element) decides not to go there but to the small restaurant with a good food review and relative prices, this seems to also include rational thinking.
Think more as wise as possible like a heart that knowing I'm still in the right track...
Vs
Think more as wise as possible especially if you're honest just like me, being not ashamed of pleading myself before myself over and over again even if the person who read this comment wasn't you
. . . but but but it is logical to also consider the hours during which the restaurants are open, and they should have utilized a holiday, when these restaurants are closed, to generate these lists for debate and deliberation, so that they become better prepared later.
Think more the Hardest way as how the Imagery and design of Caligari further enhances the anxiety through the use of dark eerie dark eerie shadows
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as how the film's dramatic effects produce motifs of claustrophobia and paranoia
Think more the Hardest way when I know humanity isn't always in the form of entertainingly helping each other, charitying other, care for other...
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as wise as how I see the opposite reflection when I personally perform one such example of these humility contents
Think more the hardest way as *Relative URL* which located a resource using an absolute URL as a starting point and how it consists only the path and the resource but not the server or the scheme.....
Vs
Think more the hardest way as *Absolute URL* which contains all the information necessary to locate a resource and how it uses scheme, server, Path and resource...
Think more the hardest way as how People communicate with each other in various social interactions, but at that time, they are in the domain of mass communication as well...
Vs
Think more the hardest way as why it is by using the means of mass communication that one can reach the whole society
Think more but not as Therapist...
Vs
Think more but as a person who supported me mentally, physically, spiritually
Interesting analogy but I'm not sure I agree with you, at least based on the content of this video.
In so far as the analogy goes it seems to exclude the time constraint of "going out for dinner tonight" in the build up to the evaluation. There is no reason why that could not have been a piece of information used to constrain the time taken in making the evaluation.
The way I see it is that rationality, or the act/quality of being rational, is to do things in such a way that they be considered logical. I.e.: they conform to accepted logical axioms.
Critical thinking can be described as a process of evaluation that one engages in in order to make a judgement. I.e.: the acquisition and consideration of information with respect to certain goals or questions.
If an evaluation is not logical (rational) you may draw incorrect conclusion/s, or by chance draw correct conclusion/s but with no valid and/or sound reason/s for how you got there.
In my view, critical thinking is a rational (or logical)l analysis of some set of information while rationality is a term we use to describe someone/something being rational.
Why engage in an evaluation that consumes time and energy if you are not wanting to arrive at the correct, or at the very least the best possible conclusion?
Okay, thx! So, rationality trades off some rigorousness for pragmatism. Finding out what the best restaurant is vs. visiting the best restaurant.
Think more as wise with 10-15 minutes timeless stretch
Vs
Think more as wise as possible the hardest way of how I get into it after many hardest parts of examining myself
I believe this is more a debate of linguistics. The words are so similar in semantic use whatever the majority wishes shall be their division.
Think more the hardest way as how according to Westley and MacLean's scheme of things, *the receiver of the message gets what the communicator wants him/her to receive..
Vs
Think more the hardest way as why Westley and MacLean argued that mass media has expanded our world so much that we by ourselves cannot obtain all the information required by us and it is here *that the role of mass media and journalists appears as they provide the necessary orientation* .
Think more as how to be KIND enough to myself when framing outside sources are unkind to me
Vs
Think more as how to LIVE like how my mind function
Think more the quickest intuitively way as wise as R is for *Rhombus* again
VS
Think more the quickest intuitively way as S is for *Semicircle* again
Think more yet not to be fool by somebody else's abilities through his/her career..
Vs
Think more but to rationalise what I'm worth for infront of everyone
Think more to remain calm and still even when in times that I have to give-up...
Vs
Think more but to rationalise the fruits of thinkingly patientness
I think rationality is a method or technique which you combine with an ideology or goal (having a good time at a restaurant), whereas critical thinking is already kind of an ideology. You apply rationality to whatever you need in order to achieve your goal, whereas you apply critical thinking to everything you possibly can (otherwise it's not critical thinking).
An elegant illustration for encapsulating her point. However, I proffer that these two entities (rationality and critical thinking) can be exchanged in this illustration. Certainly the point made that it's possible with critical thinking alone to over-focus to the point of losing sight of the necessary overall picture, can also interpreted as to potentially apply to any rational process, up to an including rationality itself. But the argument being subtly interwoven into this illustration is the assertion that rationality, being the bigger picture itself, can never allow such oversights. And therefore, to rephrase this, rationality is an ideal by way of definition, such that when properly followed can never unwittingly stumble into unwitting error. Thus to err is to fail to be rational. And to fail to be rational is to err. In other words, rationality has no limitations to it. However this is a kind of circular reasoning, which prompts me to realize the deity-like absoluteness which rationalists ascribe to rationality; as though it is something transcendental and above any (otherwise human) limitation. Yes, there is some critical thinking happening here. But at least by the circular argument derived from the illustration in this video, it seems as though the speaker's position is such that there is no other lens through which anyone who values rationality must view it.
Rationality includes adaptability, which dictates that our thinking needs to be modified to keep up with change - in this case time.
Is this a reupload?
So, the intense, exhaustive, contemplation (itself) on a specific question is demonstrative of critical thinking, but the disregard for the proportionality and the end result are demonstrative of the rationality (or, rather, the lack thereof more precisely).
Moral: Don’t leave all the critical thinking to irrational people, perhaps?
What is the difference between rational thinking and logic thinking ?
Think more as wise as how I feel like you pull me harder to come close to you
Vs
Think more as wise as how I know you find out what's in my mind
I've noticed that most models of rationality rely on the assumption that some choices or some actions have more value than others. (For example, economists assign value to options based on their "utility", making it the economic unit of value.) It seems to me that the important question is not, at root, what action is or is not "rational" per se, nor is it about which choice has more value, but it centers around the very idea of value itself. Value, itself, is not rational. The value of an object or an action is in the future; namely, how the object or action affects the chooser subsequent to the choice being made. That is to say, the rational chooser is attempting to predict the future value of that object or action, and since the future hasn't happened yet at the point of choosing, that prediction can only be made using historical data and information. That sifting of historical data and information, that is the act of critical thinking. The actual necessity of predicting future value, or the necessity of critical thinking, that is rationality. Visualize it this way: a rock is not in need of making choices, because it exists at the whim of outside forces, but a fly has internal forces and motivations behind its behaviors. If the fly simply moves around aimlessly, choosing objects and actions at random, then it is no more rational than the rock, because the results of its behaviors are indistinguishable from that of the rock. But if the fly does make determined choices in its motion based on perceived value, then it is, as I explained above, attempting to predict the result of its choices, and at that point the fly is acting rationally. So the distinction between irrational and rational behavior is like that of the rock and the random fly, whose behavior is no wiser than the rock, versus the fly that is making valued choices. That's rationality. Critical thinking, on the other hand, is the actual process by which said fly would go about selecting options based on perceived value; therefore, critical thinking is the analytical processing of historical data for the purpose of acting rationally. Now, imagine a hammer and a nail. Rationality is the act of striking the nail more often than not (as opposed to striking the nail no more or less than would be expected by random chance), and critical thinking is the method by which the hammer achieves greater and greater accuracy of striking that nail.
Tal Moore Instrumental Rationality / Epistemic Rationality. I guess it depends on which one you Value more?
***** Again, you're making the mistake of presuming what it means to value something. Nothing has intrinsic value. Indeed, it could even be said that nothing actually has a value until an animated being is motivated to acknowledge its existence. That is to say, we imbue something with value simply by designating it as a selectable option. The act (choice), itself, defines the quality (value), and the process (rationality) prescribes the method of selection (critical thinking).
Tal Moore Intrinsic Value lets see.... Water, Food, Air. No Motivation to Acknowledge there Existence Needed when Biological Mechanisms Automatically/Naturally take care of that. Life would not exist without them. You have No Choice in this matter if You want to be in front of your computer right now reading this. What is the point of Life if Death is Equal in Value? I'm pretty sure you Value Life over Death Right?
In Essence, We Value Life for Any of This to even be happening. To Value Death more is an Illogical premise because you will need to experience Life First to even be able to consider this notion.
"Nothing has intrinsic value" Unless You where able to choose to be Born, Your Life is Intrinsically Valuable and Important for You to be able to Experience that Mind of yours. ;-))
Think more the hardest way as how my mood react when Peshawar city scenic video is played with respect to how my mind respond when Paris landscape video is shown
Vs
Think more the hardest way as ears that learn how to bring the naturally captured sound with sound effects in any particular situations
Think more as wise as how I asked one relative on Saturday that I met at funeral house about whether she's still keeping an aquarium or not at home since the last time I visited her home a decade ago....
Vs
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I figured out it is impossible nowadays to justify with the extension relatively people such as the one who comes out from other grannies, or grand ucles etc
Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as wise as what that makes me having you in my mind all the time...
Vs
Think more even I pretend like I'm okay to not let anyone realised you've got me since 17 years ago
Think more the Hardest way as how the speed required for preparing a news bulletin that has many stories translated from other languages requires a very different training of translators..
Vs
Think more the hardest way as how the Translations are also required many a time in radio features when we take the sound bites of people in various languages that are not the language of feature to be broadcasted from the radio station...
Think more the Quickest Intuitively way since the last comment, somewhere between 3600-7200 seconds ago again with respect to things I spared my time with, such as having my 3rd meal in 2½ tiny plates of cool rice, a piece of tiny fried fish, in addition with 2 cups of tea, a cup of horlick, helping to cut a ½Kg of pork and cooked it as someone who bought told me to do so, having a tasting bite to a piece of 1½cooked sliced piece of pork, Washing and cooking a 3/4 or bazaar rice to paddy rice, feeding the pigs with cooked spoiled pumpkins I cutted and cooked today's morning, a little updated visit to a 100-150m nearby roadside grocery store, having a Rs 15 of three items of spicy packaged food with onion I picked from kitchen, a ⅛ portion of bitter lemon I snatched from garden, few 4-5 pieces of tiny local coriander leaves, a dip of two types of salt, few drops of cooked oil from leftover refine oil bottle, a little portion of super hot chili powder, few portion of muri, letting someone to have a little portion of what I mixed, moment when there's no bottle pack refined cooking oil anymore as I tried to go back to same grocery store to buy for kitchen needs, a moment of how I spared my time with remaining 40% of 3GB Internet data-pack on smartphone screen etc
Vs
Think more the Quickest Intuitively way as remaining 12480 seconds of Wednesday here and remaining 52280 seconds of Wednesday there with respect to how my focussingly concentration point of view goes through out the day in 25200 seconds from 10:40 AM till 05:40 PM, and the wisest thing after all how I shouldn't be fool way always anyway no matter what again
Think more the hardest way with two self clicked photos I recently took today in the morning...
Vs
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I didn't let others deceive my mind both in reality as well as in virtuality
Think more as wise as how much minutes it take to step out from my house to neighbour house, from my settlement resident place to other neighbouring villages, towns, cities by vehicles or by any means of transportation etc...
Vs
Think more as wise as possible with kb/s instead of km/hour
Think more the Hardest way as the times of number of passerby passengering flights that passed through since the last aviation related newday updating...
Vs
Think more the hardest way as how I stopped taking pictures of closed ground flying passerby flights which appeared big from a smartphone screen capture
Good reminder, thanks.
Think more as wise as possible to fool not by background noises I heard from father voice when I talked to him through Cellphone recently...
Vs
Think more the hardest way to fool not by intentionally dropped umbrella
Think more the hardest way as characteristics of various script formats for feature films, non-fiction films, Television news and programmes...
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as why there are various script formats to suit different requirements such as a report article or news feature..
Think more the Hardest way as wise as possible like how I still not in a relationship, although how closeness my personal attachment to you virtually....
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as wise as how I'm happy to remove away myself from you, when you think I am wrong by being honestly and frankly
Think more the hardest way with why there are still selfishness in a way that I honestly communicated to you
Vs
Think more the hardest way with why I still find out this process isn't still helpful to me, although it is helpful for many
Think more the hardest way how we should remember, it's not just about including all of these different hot types in sequence, but about anticipating which questions our audience will be wondering and answering
Vs
Think more the Hardest way why usage of camera in films required us to deal with Camera movements in TV broadcasting as well as Camera angles in Photo journalism
Think more the hardest way of how I understand myself, by improving my self reliant thoughts though what I openly mentioned to anyone included you sounds guilty...
Vs
Think more just as wise as how I shouldn't let those bad habits scenes could spoil my way of thinking
Think more as wise as actual timing in New Delhi, India
Vs
Think more as wise as somewhere between 10:40 AM - 10:50 AM in Newyork, USA clock
Think more with the stuff that I really love to do alone...
Vs
Think more but not to be fool by what I can't
Think more the wisest way *if someone wants to know what's happening behind the scenes, do they ask us?*
Vs
Think more the wisest way as how *do we address the desire of others for us to be open and to share relevant information?*
My take away was that they were being rational, by brutely applying known mathematical theory to a trivial problem but weren't doing critical thinking. I reached the opposite conclusion as you based on this example.
Think more the Hardest way as how non contracted forms are used where one is supposed to emphasize where they sound more authentic and forcible
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as how a simple sentence has only one subject and one predicate
Think more the Hardest way as how the style sheets or style books of various newspapers give specific instructions to their journalists on the usage of quotations and how the Associated Press Stylebook, for example, says'Never altequotations even to correct minor grammatical errors or word usage.
Vs
Think more the hardest way as one example of the use of quotation in the news story is how Obama's 'embtace' of India to leap in economic ties according to US-Indo Asian News Services dated Washington, January 15, 2012
Think more as wise as how not to be fool by those who still misunderstood me...
Vs
Think more as wise as what if I don't have a word, but repeatedly harm myself with unhealthy imagery intuition, though cost controlly, convergently, virtually etc
Think more the hardest way with how Internet enabled us to do stuffs such as Communication (email)chat/social networking), Searching Information, Shopping, Banking, Business, Education, Entertainment..
Vs
Think more the hardest way with some major issues attached to extensive use of the Internet such as Lack of Security, Spam, Virus, Cyberterrorism
Love the punchline.
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I shouldn't be fool by those who tried to break my patterns...
Vs
Think more even how wise they go with your instructions
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I managed to complete commenting all your 46 videos before I work on what's that strike my mind...
Vs
Think more the hardest way as wise as how I respect my own rules when abiding under somebody else's rules is like how I imprison myself
LOL! This is a good point, and also a very funny video!
Think more the quickest intuitively way deep as wise as how I know my worries will soon be washed away if those who understand my situations refers to the context of what I lived everyday...
Vs
Think more the quickest intuitively way deep as wise as how I know the joy of setting my mind in peace and serenity if I would always make sure you understand my current situation at a moment that I justified with usual customs, family, friends, workplace etc
Think more the hardest way with completed comments of a day
Vs
Think more as wise as possible with incompleted comments of a day
Think more from the moment I took a back seat riding going to neighbouring village west while youngest brother drive along with mother, the neighbours and relatives that I met in the funeral house, the identified/unidentified people whom I handshaked with, the moment I took a stare at a death person in casket for twice, the amount of bank notes that mother handling to me and leave it in casket with a last wish of his blessing, while his wife, family, recognised/unrecognised children/grandchildren had a conversation with mother, the plastic cup of tea and a little amount of rice...
Vs
Think more the hardest way when I rationalised what I perceived the stuffs I dealt in virtuality with the stuff I dealt in reality
Think more the hardest way as Google map that should be regularly update on Internet, as reality of latest captured Google mapping images keep on changing
Vs
Think more the hardest way as different in Hospitalization from Modern context as compared to Ancient way of Medicinal practice
Think more the hardest way as I is for Uniform Resource Locator
Vs
Think more the hardest way as V is for Variables
Think more the Hardest way till 05:33 PM of a day...
Vs
Think more as wise with three signalling traffic lights colour, although in an Indian state where I lived street traffic signals are still considering non mandatory by many
Think more the hardest way of how I secretly talked to you like the way I shared my deepest point of view on how I rationalised my Repeatable argument...
Vs
Think more the Hardest way as wise as how I see it's helpless for me to change a person I secretly but commitedly commenting everyday