How Gravity Affects Time?
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- 🌎 Get Our Merch designed with ❤ / @insanecuriosity
💫Get 10% off Under Lucky Stars and enjoy our star maps completely custom-made 💫 www.underluckystars.com/INSAN...
Commercial Purposes ► Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com
- -
The equation underlying general relativity, also called Einstein's field equation, is based on the equivalence principle, which establishes that inertial mass and gravitational mass are equivalent. However, the respective definitions of the two types of mass are different: the inertial mass is proportional to the inertia of a body, which is the resistance to the change of the state of motion when a force is applied, while the gravitational mass is proportional to the interaction force. of a body with gravitational force.
Do you know how gravity affects time?
The equivalence principle is so-called because an observer jointed with the moving masses is unable to distinguish an acceleration due to an external force from that produced by a gravitational field. The difference is visible only from a reference system that is not jointed with the moving masses.
To try to better understand this principle, Einstein himself proposed the elevator thought experiment.
- -
"If You happen to see any content that is yours, and we didn't give credit in the right manner please let us know at Lorenzovareseaziendale@gmail.com and we will correct it immediately"
"Some of our visual content is under an Attribution-ShareAlike license. (creativecommons.org/licenses/) in its different versions such as 1.0, 2.0, 3,0, and 4.0 - permitting commercial sharing with attribution given in each picture accordingly in the video."
Credits: Ron Miller, Mark A. Garlick / MarkGarlick.com
Credits: Nasa/Shutterstock/Storyblocks/Elon Musk/SpaceX/ESA/ESO/ Flickr
00:00 Intro
2:00 Einstein Experiment
5:54 what do Einstein's field equations tell us?
Conclusion
#gravitationalforce #insanecuriosity #einstein - Věda a technologie
Officer, I wasn’t speeding. I was accelerating through a quantum energy field thereby increasing the curvature of spacetime relative to your radar gun.
Agreed for the real truth with Radar gun for famous Scotland Yard.
was it a joke.😀
Cop: “You must think I was born tomorrow.”
No. You were speeding.
And here is your ticket lol
I remember back in the mid 90s seeing a documentary type show that said time goes slower or faster depending on where you are in the universe and satellites with on-board clocks had to compensate for this. I had a really hard time accepting that since I had never heard this before, or at least put so bluntly like this. I brought this up to friends and they said that couldn't be true, time was always constant. I don't think Sci fi tv shows or movies ever addressed this in story plots.
If you take a pendulum clock, tuned to the force of gravity at ground level and moved it to the 10th floor, the clock will no longer keep time. It is the same way with GPS clocks, tiny fluctions in the satellites orbit, speed and height, affect the time keeping mechanism of the click. Two atomic clocks, in the same room, don't even keep the same time.
The time traveling Voyager 1 space probe launched in 1977 is still communicating with Earth having left our solar system, even if it traveled another 14 billion years provided the circuitry held up it would still communicate back to Earth. Light and images travel both ways, aliens in distant galaxies using similar James Webb telescopes would also see the light and images from our Milky Way galaxy. Just because the light and images from planet Mars are assumed to take 20 minutes to reach earth does not mean the Martians have traveled into another space-time dimension where the stars, planets and galaxies are in different locations from Earth. Time and distance cannot be relative to other objects in space-time as that would violate the law of conservation of energy. To travel distance requires potential energy, an observer can have no effect on a moving objects kinetic energy-Relativity debunked. If there is no universal time in time dilation then there are no universal coordinates so time couldn't exist. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Traveling at a different speed from the stationary clock having no universal time, all the stars, planets and galaxies would be in a different place in the universe so distance for the observer could never be calculated. When certain frequencies of light are shined onto metal electrons are ejected instantaneously without delay according to the photoelectric effect yet Einstein's disciples tell us the speed of light is limited to 186,000 miles per second. Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. Time and distance cannot be relative to other objects in space-time as that would violate the law of conservation of energy.
Light travels in both directions, anyone having a conversation with their friends understands this simple phenomenon yet Einstein's disciples believe people on earth are time traveling backwards and forwards in space-time relative to one another. Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-).
The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy.
From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions.
Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-).
The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time.
Light and images travel both ways, aliens in distant galaxies using similar James Webb telescopes would also see the light from our Milky Way galaxy.
Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-)
There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end.
The Doppler effect is wrongly conflated with cosmological Redshift. As one approaches a blowing horn the perceived pitch is higher until the horn is reached, then becomes lower as the horn is passed. This phenomenon is caused by the physical movement of a mechanical soundwave traveling through the medium of air, similar to throwing a rock in a pond, the rock creates physical movement in the medium of water. Cosmological Redshifts are merely the GoPro fisheye effect where wavelengths appear to lengthen-stretch from the phenomenon of gravitational lensing. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End"
If space was curved-warped according to Albert Einstein's curved-warped gravity theory gravity waves would effect time and the perfect balance in solar system orbital mechanics throwing planets off course-out of orbit in a collision course towards the sun where a planets gravity and time would increase and decrease with different velocity rates as they ascend and descend the curves of gravity waves. According to general relativity ie gravitational lensing (a warped field of vision in telescopes) is due to (mass) between a distant light source and the observer. If that were true earths huge mass would distort the light of the observer as well making telescopes unusable. So only other planets in the universe are affected by gravitational waves? In 1916 before it was known that man could travel in space Albert Einstein based his gravitational wave theory on relativity. In 2021 most of us realize if gravitational waves existed in space astronauts would be crushed like an underwater diver traveling to the bottom of the sea. Einstein's disciples defend relativity by saying gravity is a weak force, yeah so weak it affects planets and galaxies just not astronauts, the discovery space station or droplets of water in space?
According to time dilation there is no universal time in the universe so all the stars galaxies and planets have different coordinates in space-time, if that were true astronomy software wouldn't work, light-speed and space travel couldn't be calculated. Explain how the James Webb space telescope can time travel into the past to view the physical properties of matter as it was 14 billion years ago with the simple technology of a telescope :-). Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time.
Traveling at a different speed from the stationary clock having no universal time, all the stars, planets and galaxies would be in a different place in the universe so distance for the observer could never be calculated. Twins paradox debunked.
If there is no universal time in time dilation then there are no universal coordinates so time couldn't exist. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth.
Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time.
When certain frequencies of light are shined onto metal electrons are ejected instantaneously without delay according to the photoelectric effect yet Einstein's disciples tell us the speed of light is limited to 186,000 miles per second.
Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. If light has a limitation of speed how do Einstein's disciples explain time dilation and the increasingly faster rate of expansion of the theorized Big Bang?
Maxwell's equations state light has a constant speed of 299792458 m/s but if light slowed down its kinetic energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. To govern, limit or decelerate kinetic energy takes more kinetic energy duh
Applying the same equations of Einstein's time dilation on earth a Democrats gravity, speech, hearing and eyesight would be in a past dimension of space-time :-). Einstein Special Relativity Debunked for Beginners czcams.com/video/LKx_j_3Zm68/video.html via @CZcams
Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. If light has a limitation of speed how do Einstein's disciples explain time dilation and the increasingly faster rate of expansion of the theorized Big Bang? Maxwell's equations state light has a constant speed of 299792458 m/s but if light slowed down its kinetic energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. To govern, limit or decelerate kinetic energy takes more kinetic energy. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron
@@stewiesaidthat
Very interesting, but don't they eventually sync ??? I thought that was a big thing...
@@Mor2gain_760 metronomes on a moving platform sync. I don't know if clocks can be made to sync using the same method.
I am still convinced it's the expansion of space that creates time.
I'm still convinced my wife is cheating on me
@@user-wb7nv9ht1g don't know if you are joking but this was unexpected.
time was created at the Big Bang....no time before that
@@jamesrgoes Bro we don't know if there are other universes. Prob. Never will but think about it. People in other timeperiods first thought there is only one planet, one sun, one starsystem, one galaxy....until now the one big bang
@@user-wb7nv9ht1g _"I'm still convinced my wife is cheating on me"_ Sorry... didn't know I would end up meeting you... She is also cheating on me as well.
The longer l live the more l find l don't know! 🤩
Dunning-kruger effect!
That is dunning-kruger effect or metacognitive bias at work.
Better end it all then
@@joebaby739 Life's like that!
Dork
Sure... and just how again does gravity affect an abstract concept?
If this was intended to answer the question in a manner accessible to non-scientists, you have utterly failed.
My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar time! (Mikey's Time) Think of it like Alvin and the chipmunks. "Vyger's" message is fine. It's just sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or "Terran Time." It would be faster still if "Vyger" sent a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. (That name is still up for grabs.) Outside the Local Group time is the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." Now that "Vyger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar time or "Mikey's Time."
•Our sun's time bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured.
•Milky Way's time bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until Vyger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference.
•Local Group's time bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference.
•Outside any influence in the, "True Interstellar Time Standard," or...;-P Name NOT up for grabs BUT just begging to be measured. The rate/flow of time is fastest here so, surfing time here is choice though it's best to have your motor boat. ;-P
A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about.
Pass it on, please and thank you.
In Islam 1400 years back already mentioned that time in other heavens is different from this heaven and Isra Al Merage mentioned that whole journey says about time dilation. But non believers mocked. Also in Quran it’s mentioned that matters and heaven were joined together and after that these matters were separated and initial phase was in the form of smoke which scientists come to know 50 years back.
Wait, is the meter defined as the distance light travels based on the periods of Cesium on earth or if the Cesium atom is at rest in outer space?
Please make a video about the latest JWST images(first light)!!
Sure, coming in a few days!
If you can create a gravity field you can use it as propulsion and also as a like bubble shield around you. affect time and travel through space pretty fast. wherever you want to go there you are. Offset spacial divergence. But idk
In mid-air? Or mid-space. Just hit me a bit odd. Great presentation.
Time does not change All things change in time Time is a fixed rhythm Consciousness always moving front one event to the next
So how do you explain why gps has to consider the time dilation in order to give accurate position ? Otherwise gps would have never worked as it is today
@@siegfriedkaiza5135 GPS takes inputted factors and gives your location based of those factors Its output is based solely on its input
We keep talking about this like people will understand. The maths is not in language,its in maths. We literally don't have the words to explain it.
If you were being accelerated up by the Earth on the other side of the Earth a dropped ball would be moving upward not downward as we actually see.
A few questions occur to me. (rhetorical; I'm not looking for anyone's random answers to this tyvm)
1- How could/would Time be expressed to a truly non-moving observer? Consider that technically Spacetime is at very least, definitely not stationary. Consider how the hell we're even comparing Spacetime's evolution to some stationary unknown outside of the Universe.
2- Where would the afore mentioned non-moving observer be located?
Now here's one to listen to - particularly when you've got some time to kill! ⏰
I believe quantum particles are particles that exist in past, present and future at the same time. That's why quantum particles that do not connect in any way, react the same way. It's the same particle. How do these particles come to exist in all of time, at the same time, you ask. Maybe the same way all of matter gets focused to one point.
11:25 GPS satellites do not orbit at 20km altitude ;-)
He is charming and exceptional for the gravity Albert Einstein.
so lets say someone in the future enters a blackhole and lets also say that humans continue to evolve and figure out the universe and figure out how to get someone out of a blackhole. Would the person who entered the black hole feel as if they were saved as soon as they entered it? Because the gravitational pull is so incredibly strong that time moves very very slow in the blackhole vs earth or other parts of space
t and t’ have the relationship t’=r(t-Kxv). So, both t’ and t can not go back. People forget the conditions of Lorentz transformation and special relativity: point to point, inertia reference frame. What that means? It means that v in the above relationship is constant, no acceleration.
So thinking an object from v1 to v2, t’ goes backwards, is nonsense.
This whole nonsense regarding time-dilation started when some idiot couldn't figure out a simple math problem.
Speed = Distance / Time.
Time = Distance / Speed
Distance = Speed * Time.
What happens when you increase Distance but not Speed. Time Intervals Increase.
Instead of a photon hitting the detector 1 Time per second, the photon is now hitting once ever two seconds. And all of a sudden it's time-dilation
Like Syndrome said 'If Everyone Is Experiencing Time-Dilation, Then No One Is Experiencing Time-Dilation'.
So ... how do I get the time back it took me to watch this? That's what I wanna know
What’s time? There are two times here. One group thinks time is universal as t, the other thinks it is relative, as t’. t and t’ has the relationship t’=r(t-Kxv).
At speed of light, or at black hole, r=0, so t’ stops.
t’ is the time you observed through light. it is different from an object’s objective time t. Because c is considered as constant at any reference frame, so t’ and t are not synchronized. So one group thinks there is space-time. It is really just a Lorentz transformation of t. It is not more than a Fourier transformation in signal analysis, from time domain to frequency domain.
Just remember that when people talk time stops at black hole, or moving at c, that time is t’. A moving object, it’s time running faster or slower, that’s t’. Spacetime is curved, that also is the t’. We really should not think only t’ is so called time.
t’ and t, both are man-made.
That’s all.
If I was to go to such a place I would want to bring a gravity beam strong enough to study it I’m sure you could figure things out with such an item
If time is relative to velocity and time stands still at the speed of light, how do you gage what a light year is, effectively?
Mass cannot be accelerated at light speed
Light years is a measure of distance, relative to time on earth.
@@sebastianrodriguezgomez5828 my question had nothing to do with mass.
Great video !
Thank you 💜
@@eldino1504 you’re right. I am the helper of "the real one", which is always very busy creating new interesting videos. 😉
It's amazing how the weakest force in nature can affect time.
Saying gravity is bitachass weakass pussy force is so misleading. It affects everything in far more grander and violent way
If it’s not on earth is it still nature ?
I assume it is because nature refers to the nature of all things, above and below
Other videos I have viewed say that time creates gravity. I knew that can't be right, and this video clarifies this. Good. The clocks that prove time dilatation are atomic ones. Does time dilate too with analog clocks? I'm sure they don't because the hands (seconds, minutes, hours) mechanism is not at the atomic level. So, forget time travel--no such thing.
It's Gravity, or the lack of, that creates different 'tics'. Time is a constant.
@@disconer do you think it has to do with increased friction from more gravity?
@@thecaliforniamaniac8542 the further away from the gravitational force the 'freer' the atom is. Why does time even have a play in it.
@@disconer how are different tics formed?
a clock in space runs faster than an identical clock on the surface, but what of an identical clock at the bottom of the gravity well in the center of the earth? It's going to be going MUCH slower than the other two. I wonder what physcal manifestations might be occuring under our feet because of this phenomenon?
Clock in space do not run faster, as a matter of fact they run slower (opposite what SR claims) while clock nearer to the gravity well (say singularity, or sea level) should run slower, but it actually run faster. The mathematicians have been confusing people for almost 100 years now. Time to wake up from Disneyland ''physics''.
Look up Stephen J Crothers, he's a talented mathematician who was doing a PhD theses on the subject when he realize the fallacies of Einstein's errors.
@@Thebigbangisdeadgetoverit oh dear, I DID look up stephen j crothers "is a handyman/gardener and part-time amateur scientist who claims that black holes do not exist, and are neither predicted by nor compatible with General Relativity. His body of work consists primarily of articles that he posts at either viXra or his own personal website, thus steering clear of the peer review"
Sounds legit...
Listen, Believing in general relativity or believing in some nut job handyman is STILL belief on your part meaning you are not doing the thought experiments on your own, you're just regurgitating someone elses point of view without having the depth of understanding accomplished in the thought experiments to even thoroughly question what you are soaking up and believing.
Without putting in the time, you're just supplanting religion with your fantasy version of science. Same architecture.
Gravity doesn't affect time, just the device used to measure time. Clocks are calibrated in a lab tuned to the gravitational force at that location. Moving the timing device to another location necessitates a recalibration. On Earth, you also have to take into consideration the gravitational pull of the moon, as evidenced by the tides.
The other factor affecting the accuracy of the timing device is motion. As the motion of the clock speeds up, the farther the electron has to travel to complete a cycle. To complete a cycle, the electron goes from A to B and back to A. Only A is nolonger its original position. The cycle, in spatial coordinates, becomes A to B to C. As the motion of the timing device through space speeds up, the distance between A and C increases, effectively increasing the amount of time to complete a cycle, thus the timing mechanism ticks slower.
@@stewiesaidthat Gravity isnt a force
In regard to the body of your reply: what is the gravitational mechanism that would require recalibrating the clock from its original reading?
The delta between the two is exactly what you're trying to measure so recalibrating it out would be a mistake in process.
@@stankfaust814 two atomic clocks, in the same room, keep different times.
Grandfather clocks need to be recalibrated when moving to different floors. Gravity affects motion, motion affects time keeping devices. The universe is in constant motion. The Earth is spinning on its axis while rotating around the sun which is rotating around Sagittarius A which is moving towards the Great Attractor. Every cubic meter in the universe has its own values for gravity and motion and those values are constantly changing. Which is why there is always a master clock so that all other timing devices can be set to it. Then each year, the master clock is set based on the Earth's rotational position.
11:27 - Satellites at 20km altitude? How do they avoid getting tangled in weather balloons?
This video is a grammatical shit-show.
It always puzzles me how we are shown space-time curved as it’s on a 2 dimensional plane, the planes being curved would be infinite in every direction, would it not?
My brain wants to imagine what that space-time curve would look like in 3 dimensions, but I can’t comprehend it, like it’s on the tip of my tongue.
Time is a construct based on earth’s rotation. How can it be a physical law?
Time is not based on earth's rotation, instead, our time units of measurement are based on earth's rotation.
@@sebastianrodriguezgomez5828 you should probably smoke less weed my friend
Time dilation was not observed in the orbits of the S-type stars close to the supermassive black hole Sgr A* in the core of our galaxy. Why is that?
because Time is a constant. If light speed slows time down, then why do we consider it taking 13 billion years to get to us - wouldn't that be a lot sooner if time was a variable?
@@disconer The radio telescopes observed the star S-02 as it neared the supermassive black hole and orbited around it extremely fast. According to GR time is supposed to slow down for objects nearing large mass like a supermassive black hole. So we should see the star S-02 slow down as it nears the supermassive black hole not accelerate. But the star accelerated just like Mercury does when it's obit takes it close to the sun. Time dilation was not observed. Regardless how long it takes the light to get here, when it does the radio telescopes see it in real time. There was no time dilation.
I have some really bad news. Gravity and Time have *Zero* to do with each other.
What is time? Time is something that can be used to describe changes. If everything is static then there is no need of time. So time is a state variable. It is man-made, mathematical, non-physical variable, to describe the state changes of the universe. It is independent from space. The existence of universe doesn’t need time, it is our human being that needs time to describe the changes of our universe.
What clock measures is the synchronized events. Atomic clock measures atomic vibration events, electronic watch measures quartz frequency, watch measures mechanical vibration events, the earth spins a turn as a day, moves a turn around sun as a year. We humans use different synchronized events to express different time.
Atomic clock measures atomic vibration frequency. The frequency is very precise. The cesium-133 atom to perform 9,192,631,770 complete cycles as 1 second. But its accuracy is still based time-keeping clock. In other words, the unit 9,192,631,770 cycles per second is calibrated with time-keeping clock.
Time just exists what you described are units of measurement for time (second, hour, year) without time nothing can move, there would be no interactions, no interchange of energy, time is what differentiates a estate of the universe.
@@sebastianrodriguezgomez5828 without time, everything moves. The state changes of the universe are due to the unbalanced forces, not due to the time. Forces cause states, not time causes states. State changes can be described as time flowing. Second, hour are not the units of time, they are the unit of man-made time.
I'll get one of those watches, as long as the rest of the world realizes that I'll be late, as usual.
But... WHY does matter existing in our 1st 3 dimensions(gravity), also pull on Time?
Why is Time subjective and what does that imply for Time's perceived omnipotence?
Because time doesn't even exist as a force. It's an emergent property. Like how the wetness and liquid property of water is a macroscopic property of all the microscopic water molecules which themselves do not hold that quality alone. However I believe that time is merely an effect of the laws of physics on the function of all matter in the universe. That their rate of temporal function, if you will is merely manipulated by that which we measure, when we notice the speed and velocity in relation to a stronger gravitational object. Time is this perceived differences in rate of perceived temporal function, which the rate of physical function for individual matter can be different depending on their physical extremes. We just naturally think time is something of itself when I believe it's a combined property of the universe, like how water is wet because of the combined H20 molecules.
In short I think time doesn't exist. Or, not as we think, I do not believe it exists as a force. However I believe that when we measure time we are merely measure a property of the universe that is emergent due to multiple functions of the different laws of physics.
I agree. Much like the resistance we can feel while holding our hand out of a moving car window, I hypothesize that gravity is the resistance we observe as matter increases. I'm probably wrong, but yes, an emergent property.
Not everyone has seen movie. Shouldnt spoil it
Our bodies are like clocks as well... They tell us our time...
I still don't fathom what is "curve" and what is space-time curvature.
Make a video on how speed affects time then we talking👌🏾
You're so hypnotized it's embarrassing
@@davidsheckler8417 are you high mate?
You need more diagrams in this video to explain to the rest of us struggling with the concept. Puting a paragraph on the screen and reading it doesn't do much in terms of breaking it down. Good video and flow otherwise :)
Thank you for watching
Completely agree with this!
You just love cartoons & pie charts about things that don't exist
Nothing affects time, Time is CONSTANT. One second will always be one second.
Yeah, you will still percieve one second as one second, but your second is different from other people seconds, depending how much gravity they are exposed to
@@sebastianrodriguezgomez5828 can you describe how exactly gravity changes someone’s time? Don’t say Lorentz transformation curves time. Gravity has nothing to do with Lorentz transformation.
gravity doesnt affect time but both are linked by velocity as einstein points to.
TIME is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an entire city complain about the same TIME paradox unless it was effected by it. Maybe a TIME distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of TIME distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're randomly given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? There is SO MUCH MORE to TIME than we realize. TI-I-I-IME, is on my side. Yes, it is!
Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. If the speed of gravity and light are 186,000 miles per second and the Sun is 8 minutes and 20 seconds in Earth's past dimension of space-time, explain how Earth and planets in our solar system can maintain orbits without gravity while the Sun is in Earths future space-time? :-). The speed of light and gravity are both 186,000 miles per second, if the speed of light slows with the stretching of space-time, gravity must also slow as well. Explain how the planets in our solar system can maintain orbits if the gravity from the Sun slows down! If the Suns light, gravity and images are in a past dimension of space-time using the same frame of reference, all the stars, planets and galaxies in the universe would have different coordinates than Earth and would thereby violate the law of conservation of energy.
Light and images travel both ways, aliens in distant galaxies using similar James Webb telescopes would also see the light and images from our Milky Way galaxy but if they believe we're in the past dimension of big bang space-time they'll never bother to contact us. According to time dilation there is no universal time in the universe so all the stars galaxies and planets have different coordinates in space-time, if that were true astronomy software wouldn't work, light-speed and space travel couldn't be calculated. Explain how the James Webb space telescope can time travel into the past to view the physical properties of matter as it was 14 billion years ago with the simple technology of a telescope :-). Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time . If the speed of gravity and light are 186,000 miles per second and the Sun is 8 minutes and 20 seconds in Earth's past dimension of space-time, explain how Earth and planets in our solar system can maintain orbits without gravity? :-) Relativity debunked with celestial mechanics.
The time traveling Voyager 1 space probe launched in 1977 is still communicating with Earth having left our solar system, even if it traveled another 14 billion years provided the circuitry held up it would still communicate back to Earth. Light and images travel both ways, aliens in distant galaxies using similar James Webb telescopes would also see the light and images from our Milky Way galaxy. Just because the light and images from planet Mars are assumed to take 20 minutes to reach earth does not mean the Martians have traveled into another space-time dimension where the stars, planets and galaxies are in different locations from Earth. Time and distance cannot be relative to other objects in space-time as that would violate the law of conservation of energy. To travel distance requires potential energy, an observer can have no effect on a moving objects kinetic energy-Relativity debunked. If there is no universal time in time dilation then there are no universal coordinates so time couldn't exist. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Traveling at a different speed from the stationary clock having no universal time, all the stars, planets and galaxies would be in a different place in the universe so distance for the observer could never be calculated. When certain frequencies of light are shined onto metal electrons are ejected instantaneously without delay according to the photoelectric effect yet Einstein's disciples tell us the speed of light is limited to 186,000 miles per second. Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. Time and distance cannot be relative to other objects in space-time as that would violate the law of conservation of energy.
Light travels in both directions, anyone having a conversation with their friends understands this simple phenomenon yet Einstein's disciples believe people on earth are time traveling backwards and forwards in space-time relative to one another. Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-).
The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy.
From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions.
Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-).
The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time.
Light and images travel both ways, aliens in distant galaxies using similar James Webb telescopes would also see the light from our Milky Way galaxy.
Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-)
There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end.
The Doppler effect is wrongly conflated with cosmological Redshift. As one approaches a blowing horn the perceived pitch is higher until the horn is reached, then becomes lower as the horn is passed. This phenomenon is caused by the physical movement of a mechanical soundwave traveling through the medium of air, similar to throwing a rock in a pond, the rock creates physical movement in the medium of water. Cosmological Redshifts are merely the GoPro fisheye effect where wavelengths appear to lengthen-stretch from the phenomenon of gravitational lensing. If the Suns light, gravity and images are in a past dimension of space-time using the same frame of reference, all the stars, planets and galaxies in the universe would have different coordinates than Earth and would thereby violate the law of conservation of energy.
. According to general relativity ie gravitational lensing (a warped field of vision in telescopes) is due to (mass) between a distant light source and the observer. If that were true earths huge mass would distort the light of the observer as well making telescopes unusable. So only other planets in the universe are affected by gravitational waves? In 1916 before it was known that man could travel in space Albert Einstein based his gravitational wave theory on relativity. In 2021 most of us realize if gravitational waves existed in space astronauts would be crushed like an underwater diver traveling to the bottom of the sea. Einstein's disciples defend relativity by saying gravity is a weak force, yeah so weak it affects planets and galaxies just not astronauts, the discovery space station or droplets of water in space?
According to time dilation there is no universal time in the universe so all the stars galaxies and planets have different coordinates in space-time, if that were true astronomy software wouldn't work, light-speed and space travel couldn't be calculated. Explain how the James Webb space telescope can time travel into the past to view the physical properties of matter as it was 14 billion years ago with the simple technology of a telescope :-). Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time.
Traveling at a different speed from the stationary clock having no universal time, all the stars, planets and galaxies would be in a different place in the universe so distance for the observer could never be calculated. Twins paradox debunked.
If there is no universal time in time dilation then there are no universal coordinates so time couldn't exist. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth.
Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time.
When certain frequencies of light are shined onto metal electrons are ejected instantaneously without delay according to the photoelectric effect yet Einstein's disciples tell us the speed of light is limited to 186,000 miles per second.
Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. If light has a limitation of speed how do Einstein's disciples explain time dilation and the increasingly faster rate of expansion of the theorized Big Bang?
Maxwell's equations state light has a constant speed of 299792458 m/s but if light slowed down its kinetic energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. To govern, limit or decelerate kinetic energy takes more kinetic energy duh
Applying the same equations of Einstein's time dilation on earth a Democrats gravity, speech, hearing and eyesight would be in a past dimension of space-time :-). Einstein Special Relativity Debunked for Beginners czcams.com/video/LKx_j_3Zm68/video.html via @CZcams
Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. If light has a limitation of speed how do Einstein's disciples explain time dilation and the increasingly faster rate of expansion of the theorized Big Bang? Maxwell's equations state light has a constant speed of 299792458 m/s but if light slowed down its kinetic energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. To govern, limit or decelerate kinetic energy takes more kinetic energy. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron
@@michaelbariso3192 Nobody is reading that term paper bro. You completely wasted your "time" 🤣🤣🤣.
@@E_Cleazy When you have no evidence for your beliefs, refute, devalue and slander your opponent's character with smear campaigns aka tactical stupidity. When Einstein's disciples are unable defend relativity they deflect from answering questions in debates by using ad hominem attacks aka deflection-misdirection. Once members of the cult have been conditioned to believe an ideology all evidence to the contrary is rejected. Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information only in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories while having no evidence for their beliefs aka an argument from ignorance. The scientific method refutes arguments with logic facts and reason not childish ridicule.
Again, explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. What do you think a psychiatrist would say if a patient told them when the Sun comes up on the horizon it's not really there :-). The speed of light and gravity are both 186,000 miles per second, if the speed of light slows with time dilation gravity must also slow as well. Explain how the planets in our solar system can maintain orbits if the gravity from the Sun slows down!
If the speed of light and gravity from the Sun were slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. It's scientifically impossible for light, gravity and images to stretch with the fabric of space time as that would require a re-convergence of geometry, there are no TV-monitor DCU digital conversion circuits in space duh.
The light and images from the James Webb telescope are in real time. If the Suns light, gravity and images are in a past dimension of space-time using the same frame of reference, all the stars, planets and galaxies in the universe have different coordinates than Earth. I've given you the gift of viewing God's incredible universe in real time but you'd rather believe in a fantasy ??. Ignorance is not knowing and doing, stupidity is knowing and doing anyway. Einstein Relativity 1=2 Fantasy Physics, Wave-Particle Duality, Photon, ... czcams.com/video/0cjBdTwF6v8/video.html via CZcams
@@michaelbariso3192 Nobody is reading this shit... 🤣🤣🤣
Theory of Everything solution (short version):
Swap from Newton "real/necessary" universe over to Leibniz "contingent/not-necessary" universe as our fundamental blueprint of the universe.
This includes Leibniz calculus vs Newton calculus. Anywhere Leibniz and Newton thought different. All of it. Full swap.
Gottfried Leibniz "contingent/not-necessary" universe just lacked 2022 quantum physics verbiage (just match up definitions) and Hamilton's 4D quaternion algebra (created 200 years after Leibniz died).
Lastly, our first number is NOT 1.
It's 0.
Our ten numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3,...9 ✅.
Our ten dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D,...9D ✅.
Ask someone to begin counting. I bet they begin with 1.
1 is not the beginning.
0 is the beginning.
1D is a Line; two points; physical; matter; contingent.
0D is a (point); exact location only; no spatial extension; zero size; necessary.
Examples:
What is another word for quark?
fundamental particle, elementary particle.
Do quarks take up space?
Its defining feature is that it lacks spatial extension; being dimensionless, it does not take up space.
"0D (point)"
How fast do quarks move?
the speed of light
What is an elementary particle example?
" " -my insert
Elementary particles include
quarks "0D (point)" (the constituents of protons and neutrons),
leptons "1D line" (electrons, muons, taus, and neutrinos),
gauge bosons "2D plane" (photons, gluons, and W and Z bosons) and the Higgs boson "3D volume".
What is the size of an elementary particle?
The elementary particles are not believed to have any size at all. As currently understood they are zero size points. Protons and neutrons (and all hadrons) are about 10−15m.
See what I mean?
Beginner 101 video
GPS errors about 50 to 100 meters from my observation road on freeway.
Force of gravity can also be applied on a small scale but light cannot reach that small distance so this discovery led me to conclude that it is possible to travel faster than light in fact it is not even the biggest challenge
No.
No.
If you traveled far, far away from Earth (presumably at the speed of Light), but could still consistently 'see' Earth at a decent size in your vision or via powerful telescopes... you would be viewing it as it was IN THE PAST. 😳
In some cases, you'd be looking at it well prior to the existence of mankind. And, if you traveled BACK... would it be nearly 'as you'd left it'? Or, would it have aged relative to your Lightspeed travels?! 🤔😳🤔
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
you zip away for an hour at light speed - then zip right back - the time will be '2 hours' you were away
no, your seeing the light of present time of the past. your not travelling back in time. What Einstein's theory of relative suggests is that if a human was to travel into black hole, the human would be going back in time. This is why one of leading problems in science is the black hole information paradox. Objects that enter the black hole are erased and the matter that entered black hole is erased. This makes complete sense because in the sense that if a human was to enter the black hole and they were going back in time, they would reverse time until they are not born, but that doesn't make sense in term of science. science no matter is lost or gained, only transformed, altered, changed.
our current problems is now figuring how to accelerate time. we already know that gravity is force that slowdown time but we do not know which force accelerates time.
Gravity is all a matter of time. ⏰
Yes PBS already did a post on this topic to "Does Time Cause Gravity?". I'll guess it seems so. Specially when you know about GPS and time dilation!
@@UtraVioletDreams Now this sounds like someone l've heard before. Someone who certainly knows his gravity. ✔
@@mm-dw4rr U''re always funny. M! I love ya!
@@UtraVioletDreams Wishing you all the best and a really, really good day. 😀
gravity doesnt effect time, gravity effects light, time is the measure of light, not light itsself. blackholes dont effect time either, they effect light.
Incorrect
Yeah, it just sounds like science fiction... black hole and all...
Light doesn’t recognize time. Time stops at light speed. Time is relative at lesser speeds…
@@macysondheim your not implying that something that effects light also effects time? cause that would mean time would stop when its night time on half of earth, cause light is being effected, right?
@@zeebest1004 think its time doesnt recognize light. light can be bent or stopped, time cant.
Or does time create gravity?
I'm fairly certain that that is mu and nu and not mu and v
In Dutch we say.....
Hoe ouder hoe gekker.....
How older how crazier...
Einstein was in his time with his view of space right.....
Now i think we can prove different with our technology...
The planets arent on the same plane and all different sizes and strengt
Hoe ouder hoe gekker ja. Hoe gek ben ik dan als ik 25 jaar voor de eeuwwisseling ben geboren? :p
Yip dat was hij, zou cool zijn als wij hem eens ongelijk kunnen bewijzen. Maar tot nu toe is dat nog heel moeilijk!
EN mode on:
Madness comes with age yes. How mad am I when I'm born 25 years before the turn of the century?
Yip he was, would it not be cool if we finally can proof hem wrong. but it is very hard to do so!
At 5:33 I gave up.... too much even when not ready to sleep.
Space-time is dark matter
Time is a constant
"electromagnetisism"
Done.
i'd use it to tell the time.
Interesting video I think if the guys a robot who's trying to explain everything 😂
Thank you for watching 💜
@@insanecuriosity2682 you guys make the best videos keep up the good work
I've figured out how to change the stars by stopping hurricanes. Don't worry, I've technically already done the hard part and changed the stars. My parents were teachers and for almost 2 decades, they taught their students my constellation. Those kids will teach their kids. So on and so on. See, stars changed. I just need help to make it legit and with the rest. I need to get to Texas ASAP. No, I'm not kidding. Yes, I'm serious. I get 7 things and remember, crazy is a compliment. Will you please help?
Space is not curved.
Time.... does not care about your measuring devices, and is not concerned about gravity. It just is. Fiddling with a chronometer merely affects said chronometer. Time looks upon such foolishness with complete indifference.
the only part of time i understood was november 1915
gravity does not affect time mass affects time. Gravity is your velocity in time.
No, gravity is the deformation of space-time caused by mass
Even though i learned some interesting stuff in this video; I feel dumber now.
I know you mean well with videos like that, but if you research a bit you'll learn that it's not gravity that affects time. It's the other way around. Gravity is the result of time passing at different rates. Gravity cannot affect time, since time is the cause of gravity.
Thought huge mass of planets caused gravity
@@shernicehernandez190 That's a popular "white lie" explanation in popular science talks. Matt O'Dowd (Ph.D astrophysicist) who hosts PBS Space Time has an episode about this: czcams.com/video/UKxQTvqcpSg/video.html
in·ex·o·ra·bly perhaps? :)
Why time exist but the affects dos not matter.😕
The rotation of the clock is it the same rotation of univers .😕
Pulling some G’s
But I knew that anyhow? 😂😂😂👍
Learning: 5:50
Mass . Not gravity. Gravity is the effect not the cause.
D…. Did you just pronounce μ as “moo”?
What what in the what what
Time is a human construct
Everything is a human construct. The universe doesn't analyse itself, it just is.
No, the human construct are the units of measurement, for example: seconds, hours, years.
Gravity affects time? That's wrong. Mass bends spacetime, so time flows slower and slower as you get closer to the mass. And it's that slowing of time what causes "gravity", in fact it IS gravity. Time dilation is gravity!
Better title would be: "Mass affects time and that causes gravity".
That's absolutely correct bcs gravity is an unproven myth so it can't affect anything 👍
You're wrong. If time created gravity, then each atomic clock would create its own gravity. No clocks, no gravity? We invented time, not nature.
@@jeancorriveau8686 No, we invented clocks to measure time. Our universe can't exist without time, it's the 4th dimension. Experiments with atom clocks showed that time dilation is real. You obviously don't understand what time physically is... Time is not created by clocks. And "each atomic clock would create its own gravity" sry but that's the stupidest thing i heard in a long time.
@@basti4655 You say time creates gravity, and you imply that time is physical. Nothing else than the clock is physical, though. So, the clock is the time. You don't agree because you believe that time is physical. Ok. Since time drives gravity (according to your interpretation), time drives everything. That has been the view for thousands of years: time is needed to make things happen. Since time is physical, some other physical entity must drive it? It can't be time because that's circular reasoning. Time doesn't exist, then.
time to get off the peyote
Physics is hard enough when the person is speaking your language. I have no idea what this robot thinks it’s trying to say. C’mon, @Insane, at least friggin’ try.
How this Nonsense Affects the Sheeple
I wonder if this would still be true when we finally find a way to fold space to make a distant place in the universe be like a step into the next room. A couple of lightyears distance in one small step.
The same is also mentioned in Hindu scriptures. Like srimad bhagwat mahapuran.
There's no such thing called gravity
Time doesn't exist gravity can't effect nothing
Time is abstract (unless you can categorically say what it tangibly, physically is). You can't 'bend' an abstract; you can't apply any physical action to something that is abstract . Time references change, and change is reference-frame (quantum) specific.
Time is a man made concept you 🐑
Of course time bends, we have proven it over and over in the past 100 years.
@@jaredf6205 Ask any physicist "what is Time" and they can't tell you (see 'closer to the truth' or ask Lee Smolin). If you don't know what Time is, you don't therefore know what is 'bending'. What you witness are divergent change-series. That's very different to a universal time 'thing' being 'bent'. To begin with, change is reference frame (e.g. quantum) specific.
First
Second
🥈😉💜
! 💝 💯 👏 🎉 🙏 🚀 👍 🤖 🎅 ✝ 🌝 !
... ya , but why male models?
:P
Didn't understand a thing
It does not.
4.5 B years
Pf who cares about that
Don't believe everything you hear.
Unwatchable. Big Fail on digitized voice. Major turn off.
bruh i was so happy i was like: finally people found out the relationship between time and gravity and after watching this for like a min with lots of skips i was disappointed af
i mean seriously it's so obvious how do u people not get it the speed at which strings move is time duh the higher the gravity the slower time gets and vice versa also the reason why we can't go back in time ok it wasn't that ez to figure out but come on how come no one knows what time is it's like the answer is in front of u and you're ignoring it sigh after 1000 years hopefully
🤓
The subscripts are pronounced mu and nu. Scrap the computer voice. And the annoying “music.”
This video did not do a good job of explaining... I don't know if it's the monotonous voice lulling me to sleep or the bouncing around different topics too abruptly.
There is No 'space-time', and space is Not cyrved,
No, gravity dont affects time, it is a mess.