Is Enzo Le Fee Ready for a Move to Man Utd or...?
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 04. 2023
- 1ST Enzo Le Fee Analysis: • Why Enzo Le Fee is the...
Contact Email: atlantisfootball96@gmail.com
Instagram: @AtlantisFootball
Twitter: @atlantis861
Is Enzo Le Fee Ready for a Move to Man Utd or...?
RECENT VIDEOS
1.) Why Maguire's Mistake vs Sevilla Wasn't De Gea's Fault: • It Was NOT De Gea's Mi...
2.) Is Alexis Mac Alister the Right CM for Ten Hag's Man Utd?: • Is Alexis Mac Allister...
3.) How Ten Hag Nulified Di Zerbi's Attack with THIS System... Man Utd 0-0 Brighton FA Cup Semi Final
4.) Why Tyrell Malacia would EXCEL in this Role in Ten Hag's Man Utd Side: • Why Tyrell Malacia wou...
5.) Why Martial is So Important for Ten Hag's Man Utd: • Why Martial is so Impo...
Analysis of Dalot's Goal: • Why Dalot Works as an ...
Why Antony is a Forward NOT A Winger: • Antony is a Forward NO...
Bruno Fernandes as a Regista: • How Ten Hag Can use Fe...
How Good is Jeremie Frimpong: • Why Frimpong would Imp...
How Good is Rasmus Hojlund: • Is Højlund the Perfect...
Playlists
1.) Man Utd BIG GAME Analysis Playlist: • How Ten Hag's 'LONG BA...
2.) Man Utd Transfer Series Playlist: • Ten Hag's Man Utd Need...
Instagram: atlantisfootball
Twitter: atlantis861
Email: atlantisfootball96@gmail.com
I must state that in NO way, shape or form am I intending to infringe rights of the copyright holder. Content used is strictly for research/reviewing purposes and to help educate. All under the Fair Use law.
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
If you ever wish for more information on visual or auditory terms, please click the link below:
is.gd/wvjoCp - Sport
I personally think getting him right now before someone else snatches him would be the right call given how rare these types of players are. He's a low risk high reward gamble in my opinion in the same vein as Malacia.
After watching that Brighton game, I want caicedo. He’s so aggressive and very nimble and a good first phase player as well. Would improve our pressing massively as well.
There’s Casemiro, i wonder how both will fit
Cacedio is really expensive. Over £80m. He is basically a younger Casemero. Really good but really expensive. United need at least 2 midfielders not one.
But we need two new midfielder.
I think we need to sell Fred, McTominay and we shouldn't buy a 29 years old Sabitzer.
Instead lets go for maybe
Caceido for 70 mill,
Tielemans for free and
another one like Lavia for 15 million/ Le Fee if he is cheap/Gravenberch who is going to be cheap/ Kovacic who will be cheap.
My dream midfield signings will be Caceido, Gravenberch and Kovacic. Caceido is expensive but the other two are real cheap cause Bayern and Chelsea respectively are trying to sell them.
I'm taking Lavia over Caicedo
Same , I would also get kokcu
The problem we have is Ten Hag is not a DOF or coach and seems to only buys Ajax ,Dutch or players who have played in Holland
Our scouting and recruitment system is still unprofessional
That needs to be sorted out now
exactly. at ajax, ten hag had overmaars who is regarded as one of the best DOF. at united he’s working with bloody murtough💀
We bought 2 Ajax players
Low priced mystery players we need to get back to buying. Look a Brighton buying players who would eventually sell for a price that a Man Utd player should command.
I’ve given up with the standard woodward signings. I don’t want to see United just buying the next biggest name. Players that are less known but have the same or higher potential are players we need to go for. Especially due to the fact we need to get rid and replace many current squad players
We kinda need a deep roster. No more marquee signings and instead sign 5 or 6 guys. I would get a cheap striker like Santiago Gimernez and free agent Marcus Thuram as the strikers and then Caqueret and Enzo Lee Fee and Ugarte in the midfield and Kim Min Jae as CB. All the options are cheap and not too old. You could get all those players for a combined £140m. You could ship out Maguire and McTomminy for £60m combined which reduced the net spend to £80m. Wait a year and get Kane for free. That's sustainable spending.
@@almac9203you should be in charge of our transfers since the United board don’t know what they’re doing. This is so sensible
@@almac9203 Lol. I actually like your analysis. But then this is Manchester United we're talking about. Do you remember Liverpool when they went out to buy 9 players and ended up outside the top 4? Please let's spend money on quality. Btw, it's not our money right😉
@@chongdaniel4860 you probably aren't aware of this but United has the highest net spend on transfers in the entire world. We spent more on our squad than City and Real Madrid and Bayern and Barcelona yet we are Europa league rather than UCL standard. The Glazers approach of marque signings simply doesn't work. We have been foolish with the money. We are losing money and are in trouble with FFP rules because of this nonsense. Cacedio was offered to United last year for under £5m and this guy just bossed our Midfield. We didn't sign Cacedio when he was cheap because he wasn't a big enough name to sell shirts. We now want him when his asking price is £90m. Our Scout's identified Haaland a couple of years ago when his price was around £20m but the Glazers didn't want him because he wasn't a big name. This is the kind of nonsense that caused United to be bossed by Brighton. We need a director of football and a scouting network to fix this mess. One marquee signing isn't fixing this mess when the rest of the squad is trash. We need a clean out and new players and we can't afford to fill the team with £100m players. We need some cheaper players. There are tons of good young players throughout Europe and South America and we can get them if we operate like Real Madrid and City and Barcelona.
Loved the video was very interesting but 1 thing I noticed is when you compared enzo and kovacic, you didnt take in to account both players played for very different teams.
This is not only the quality of players that surround kova and enzo but also playing styles. I really do think that if you put enzo in to our team with bruno, case, eriksen etc plus ETH coaching him.
He will explode in 6 months to a year on to the next level.
He's a good cheap option, he's low risk because he won't cost too much, with a potential very high ceiling if he can develop effectively (which ten Hag is very good at doing)
I think we should sign him due to our midfield players he can adapt well like our coach is dealing with Malacia in the left back.
Why should United wait until 2026 before signing such a good player
Although yes, you could say Le Fee is “a level below” in terms of his progressive passing with (6.46) per 90 in comparison to Eriksens (7.19), Le Fee is a far better progressive ball carrier, with (2.76) to Eriksens (0.96) per 90. Le Fees ability to progress the ball in multiple ways is extremely useful.
Next, you said that Eriksen is “a level above” in terms of his creativity in the final third. Yes, Le Fee has a marginally lower xA of (0.14) in comparison to Eriksens (0.15), but when adjusted for possession, Le Fee comes out on top. He also has higher shot creating actions, and completes more key passes. Both players take corners and free kicks for their teams, leaving no room for stat padding.
Next, I think you’re slightly underselling Le Fees defensive contributions. Le Fee completes (3.3) tackles per 90, which is the sixth highest of all midfielders 27 and under in Europe’s top 5 leagues. Although his tackle success rate and % of dribblers tackled leaves a lot to be desired. But yes, he would be an astronomical upgrade defensively in comparison to Eriksen as you said.
Also, I feel like the Kovacic comparison is a little unfair. Kovacic plays in a far more possession heavy side. When adjusted for possession, around (12.1%) of Kovacic‘s passes are progressive passes, in comparison to (11.4%) of Le Fees, which is quite comparable. When you take into account that Le Fee is a better progressive ball carrier, and creates more chances, they seem a lot closer in terms of quality. (Admittedly Le Fee takes corners and free kicks, whereas Kovacic doesn’t). It’s also worth pointing out that Le Fee is much better defensively, particularly in terms of his pressing.
The one aspect that you didn’t touch on, which is arguably the most vital, is the player’s availability. The most important trait in football that doesn’t get highlighted enough. Eriksen has missed (67) days through injury over the last 2 seasons (excluding his heart condition). Kovacic has missed (87) days through injury over the last 2 seasons (excluding corona virus and other illnesses). Astonishingly, Le Fee has never missed a single game through injury in his entire professional career. Obviously being 6 years Kovacic’s junior and 8 years Eriksens junior is also a major positive.
I’m only pointing out how much I rate Le Fee because I believe he should be Liverpool’s number 1 midfield target this summer as Thiagos understudy, given Thiagos awful injury record. This should be alongside Mac Allister and Caicedo, completely revamping the Liverpool midfield.
I’m also quite curious, who are the other players that you would prefer United to sign ahead of Le Fee?
If ETH is so obsessed with De Jong, then he can get Le Fee and train him !We need bodies in that midfield that can give the coach options!He is young and has energy and will only get better! He will fit into the coaches style of play and at least he is press resistant!Get him now!
I would love Caqueret as the number 8 to replace Erikson. Excellent at progressing the ball under pressure and tackles and presses all day long. Get Caqueret for £40m and Enzo Lee Fee as the bench player that can cover all 3 midfield positions and wing for a paltry £15m. You could get both together for what we offered Chelsea for Mason Mount!
Barcelona are never going to sell FDJ to United maybe City but Barca are so much in debt there have to sell someone lol
Caicedo and enzo le fee 🔥
Please do a video on Kokcu.
We should sign Le Fée or a players of similar quality/price instead of splashing cash and chasing bellingham and de jong. Lets sign a midfielder in the same way we signed Malacia - a young backup with plenty of first team experience and room to develop. Luckily we have a reliable midfield 3 for the short term, we just need what we have always lacked: squad depth!!
I like Le Fee alot but I think he isn't ready for that big move yet. We can sign him and loan him to Brighton or Dortmund for 1 or 2 years. If we can't get FDJ, I'd prefer we sign Kovacic for instant impact.
Dortmund wouldn’t do that lmao
I would swap Eriksen, Sabitzer and McTominay (all packed) for LE FEE with no hesitation whatsoever. I even think he will come better than Mac Allister... BTW, I would prefer Osimhen or Hojlund over Kane all day long.
The media wants Kane to stay in England and are trying to suckered United into overpaying and will want outrages pay for this aging striker ! It's no way to start a rebuild ! Kane should stay at Spurs ! It's time we bought a young quality striker with the future and rebuild in mind ! Nobody else is going to give him what he will want , Newcastle no way they are building we need to take notice ! Besides I think the most important man or one very similar to him Paul Mitchell is essential we need a proper C.E.O if we are ever going to stop being the clowns of Europe in transfares and negotiations ! TenHagg as said the same in different words of course !
hes one of the mid 3 we need, case, mac allister, le fee. heck even eriksen, mac allister, le fee will do. also hope zidane, maino etc got more chance next season.
dunno why ppl try to get a pure destroyer in caicedo, while we wanted our mctom out.
we just fine with carrick, or city with rodri, or barca with busquet or chelsea with enzo, and so on.
We should buy him. If he's not going to be a starter at least he'd be a quality player off the bench like foden was for city
I heard a French journalist say he would be available for £15m. Why would you even look at Mason Mount for £55m when this guy could do that Utility role for a fraction of the price?
@@almac9203 exactly! The guts in-charge of signings don't do smart deals
That’s the problem United have good player by all standard so energetic n fast on the ball.United can get him as cheap as 20mil but they will sit there till some low team get him to torment us before realizing he is a good player and spend big on him.They should send scouts to watch him he is amazing,get him,ugarte,Osimhen,Rafael leao then we can say we are building a good team and stop this Frankie Frankie thing because he love Barca
Moises caicedo should be the priority signing and Mac Allister…
Nah, too expensive. We can get the same quality for less money. Add some more technical ability on top of that too. Mattheus Nunes.
what's your opinion on André (Fluminense)?
What about EBERECHI EZE as a deeplying playmaker his dribblingis exceptional look into him
Eze, as a PLAYMAKER? Nah...
Antonio silver from benfica and
He has a good chance to make a name for himself and earn a nice wage doing so, still would like to see #KoloMuani and #GoncaloRamos this summer 👍👍👍👍 Maybe buy Le Fee next year but pay his club the fee half upfront or something on them lines similar ❓❓ Wuf everyone ❓❓🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
I don't agree with this take, seriously why wait for the guy to be a superstar before we buy him smh. We did dat with Caicedo, Enzo etc and u still wanna continue the trend. Poor
Exactly, just buy him now and if he's not ready loan him to a Wolves or Villa type team. Don't wait for them to become £80m+ superstars then fight over them with Real Madrid and Bayern. One of the few good things we did recently was to get Amad Diallo for cheap, it's clear the guy is gonna be a star and since he's already our player we don't have to fight to sign him up when he's ready for 1st team football.
Because he might not be at that level yet. Just look at Antony and Sancho. United might be better bringing in Kovacic and then waiting till Le Fee is proven and more of a sure bet and then signing him for £50m to £60m in two summers.
@@AtlantisFootball
Nah still not agreeing with that get him now. Also, Kovacic is kinda injury prone. Anthony and Sancho are being judged mostly on their price tag.
@@AtlantisFootball But then you loan them out to a Villa/Wolves/Fulham type team. The important thing is to not wait for them to become a super star then get into a bidding war for them. We've made that mistake so many times.
Just look at Caicedo at Brighton. We could have got hm for £5m, it was a done deal, then we pulled out, now look at us. We'll have to pay over 10 times the original price to get him now, and he could still flop at United if we do get him.
In short, we gain nothing by waiting and everything by moving fast and loaning them if they're not ready.
@@JerodimusPrime7 months later and caicedo goes for over 100m. Atlantis needs to see that waiting for a player to get good before wanting to sign them means utd pay a utd tax on these players. We should have got him before he went to rennes
Enzo +tieleman on free plus caicedo, kane, ndicka on free we done
we need to sign 2 midfielders, 1 like Le Fee and another natural DM.
Le Fee and Paulinha of Fulham
Buy him, loan him
Lee Fee is most ideal. He is cheap and has the package to get there. I don't believe in the idea of having to get some experience then buy him while he I expensive, many players have slottednin quite well. Man utd need to stop that business of waiting for expensive players. They need to see raw talent while cheapnand get it. Like how they did for garnacho, jurado, and those other youngsters they brought into their academy.
They spotted vidic who did well and git him cheap. This idea of let him step to another level has made Bellingham cost 150mil
But the young gems while still cheap!
Get Le Fee and Andre Trinidade for combined 50m and loan them out if we have to, I'd say to Portuguese League, personally I'd sign and keep them.
Man u need to swoop for kovacic as cover for casemiro,Fred's good but he can b inconsistent
We should get Caqueret. He is quality and far younger than Kovacic. Very mature for his age and very good at progressing the ball under pressure plus can tackle and press all day.
Sign Le Fée and Lovro Majer. Majer's got the experience and LE Fée can improve
We need to start taking chances on players for under 20 million instead of only taking chances on everyone for 50 million or more
Can you make a video about Victor Osimhen and how he could fit our system also his potential that Ten hag could make him
He doesn't fit the system. Unless we make him do things he has never done before. Like we did with Maguire/Lukaku/Sancho. I wonder how that went?
He can't fit!
Why wait for his price to go up? Just buy him now, and if he's not ready for the 1st team, loan him to a Wolves or Villa type team. Don't wait for them to become £80m+ superstar, then fight over him with the likes of Real Madrid and Bayern. That's just stupid.
Well it’s not stupid coz it might take him 2/3 seasons to reach that level which United haven’t got
@@AtlantisFootball I disagree. Even if it takes 3 years, just lone him out like we did to Chong, or like we're doing to Diallo now. We got Diallo about 2 years ago, it may take another loan before he's ready for the first team, but the main thing is we don't have to battle Madrid, City and other big clubs to sign him in the future. If it doesn't work out then you can sell them, since you got them cheap it won't be like selling Sancho who we got for £75m. Like I said before, you gain nothing by waiting for them to become a superstar before you buy them.
I’d take Dahoud from Dortmund AND Le Fee we have zero ball carriers in midfield
We need at least 2 new midfielders imo. Enzo le Fee would be ideal for 20m. We could sign this lad instead of Sabitzer for the same price. I think Tielemans on a free would be ideal while Neves could also be a strong option. Lavia of Southampton would be quality as Casemiro's long term replacement
We should sign Kokcu or Le Fee, and then Lavia. Forget Tielemans, he's average at everything. Neves? No. The Wolves player we need is Nunes.
For the same price as Neves, we can get edson alvarez. a very good player who can also play as CB ( we need flexible players)
@@letsseetofindout2560 Can't keep going for Ajax players man we need to leave them some players lmao. Neves would actually slot nicely into our midfield still only 25/26 decent defensive stats can progress forward also entering the final year or his deal aswell. Either way we need another midfielder or two
@@JohnDoe-qm8ns Nunes isn't a bad shout either. I'd happily take either of them at United but I think Liverpool want Nunes aswell. We've also been heavily linked with MacAllister who would be a great signing
@@chrissilvester5663 We only got 2!
Le fee and sabitzer complete our midfield.
Sabitzer is not good enough
Hossam Aouar
Enzo le Fee
Caqueret
We won't be buying anyone until this bloody club is sold.
Come on Glazers, just give in, you know full well you don't need this stress anymore, just sell to Sheik Jassim and take your money and run.
Is him
We are linked with and speculation united. We won’t sign any of the players we’re linked with
Mason Mount for £55m fits more what the Glazers like!
Tielemans everytime ...prem proven elite CM..class is permnt and form tempry..25 and free...just what we need...
I do not understand your conclusion AT ALL 😂
He clearly has the potential to be good enough for United, would be an instant MASSIVE upgrade on the likes of Fred, McTominay, or even Sabitzer, and will be available for a fraction of the price of the other options. 🤷♂️
Why let him go to another club and end up paying x5 the price in 2 years, when we could sign him and develop him ourselves? 🤣
ETH would be the perfect manager to develop Le Fee, and right now Eriksen plays too much, so Le Fee would get a lot of game time.
It's literally a no-brainer to sign him now and develop him.
Because United need to be competing for the title next season. If you sign him and he is the starter, he might take 2 seasons to get to the level needed also there's no guarantee he reaches that level. that's why Brighton take chances on players but the bigger clubs don't. I don't really see where the confusion is coming from, maybe if it was someone like Pedri, Bellingham etc who was available for that fee but Kovacic will cost around the same and is a far superior player atm
@Atlantis Football Who said he would be the starter? I didn't. 😅
We haven't lost a single game this season in any competition when all 3 of Bruno, Eriksen, and Casemiro have started, so IMO we don't need Le Fee to be a starter, we need him to be a quality substitute and regular rotation option, something we don't have now. Not being a starter, but getting regular game time, will mean there isn't huge pressure on Le Fee, but he will still be able to develop.
Time frame debates are pointless, sure it could take time, or like with Moices Caicedo or Enzo Fernandez, Le Fee could literally be ready for a step up in months.
Exactly, and just look at Brighton! 😂 They are run better than any other club in the league! I would rather us take chances on potential gems rather than continue with players who clearly aren't good enough (our sub midfielders).
I disagree that Kovacic will cost a similar amount to Le Fee, because Chelsea would much rather sell him abroad than to a rival, and obviously they don't really need the money 😂 I think Bayern will sign him (currently rumoured) to replace Sabitzer/Gravenberch for a low fee, but for us or City I think Chelsea would try to charge us like £40m instead.
Le Fee is young, already good enough to improve our squad, and extremely available compared to other targets.
Considering we need like 6 signings this summer (2 strikers, 2 midfielders, a keeper, and either a centre back or right back), I think Le Fee is absolutely a no brainer, and should be obvious choice to compete with Eriksen.
@@MrLePov well if he’s not going to be a starter than he’s not he right option is he. Kovacic would defo cost the same amount, Chelsea have to sell and he has one year left on his contract
@Atlantis Football what kind of moronic statement is that? 🤣
Do you think there was no point in signing Malacia, then, seeing as he's not a starter? 😅
Like I already said: we haven't lost a single game in ANY competition when Bruno, Eriksen, and Casemiro have all started, why change that? 🤷♂️
We don't need Le Fee to improve the starting XI instantly, but he would instantly improve the squad, as he has qualities that Fred/McTominay simply don't have.
Did you even read what I said?
1) Chelsea don't need money, they don't NEED to sell.
2) Even if Chelsea do sell, they would much rather sell abroad than to a rival, so IF they were to sell him to us/City, they would not do it on the cheap, because it would hurt them.
Honestly, mate, I love your player and tactical analysis, but when it comes to transfers, it seriously seems like you have no idea what you're talking about. 😕
@@MrLePov What are you talking about? It's not a moronic statement at all. Malacia wasn't signed as a first team starter was he? We are talking about signing Le Fee as an upgrade on Eriksen.
I don't really understand what you are on about, yes United do need Le Fee to improve the starting 11 immediately if he is brought in.
Also Eriksen defo needs to be upgraded, not just because he is coming into his early 30's but because he massively lacks on the defensive side of the game and could be improved from a press resistant point of view.
Also Chelsea 100% need to sell. It's ironic you say I don't know what I'm talking about and then say that. It's well known that Chelsea need to sell players before the start of the end of June, maybe 6 or 7 and Kovacic will be one of those if he isn't signing a new contract.
In 2026 we will splash 150 million for him
You obviously don't like him. He had a great game vs PSG and that is a big game. And being of the opinion he joins Brighton or Aston Villa is lame cos a few years from now we will be regretting. Enzo Fernandes, Julian Alvarez, Haaland and Caicedo should have taught you that
Mason Mount is over £55m whereas this guy is available for £15m. He would be a great squad player. Imagine this guy on the bench able to come on and fill in at 8 or 10 or wing. Caqueret to start at 8 and Enzo Lee Fee as the utility player off the bench that can cover multiple positions would be a smart transfer business.
Mctominay needs to b sold
Kukcu is better for 8
Nope
I think this is quite lazy analysis, with far too much focus on data, rather than watching the player. I have watched a lot of Le Fee this season and it’s very easy to explain why he makes less progressive passes than Kovacic… because he carries more than Kovacic. The total progressive actions are very similar if you combine progressive carries & passes. And saying he doesn’t see the play ahead of him because of this, is poor, as he creates more chances than Kovacic.
I think his biggest weakness is defensively. Although a big upgrade on Eriksen, his eagerness to win the ball means he often dives in or goes to ground too soon, and doesn’t win the ball. This also translates in his 1v1 defending.
But I do think this is something that can be coached, and at 23, there’s still room growth.
12 months left on his contract, would make him a cheap squad player. An upgrade on Sabitzer, Fred and van de Beek
It’s also fair to say that his progressive passing numbers could be lower as he plays in a team that have inferior possession in most games or because at times he plays in a more advanced role, which would explain why he receives far more progressive passes than Kovacic?
I think there are multiple reasons to explain the data, and watching enough games the context is there to see
He is defo not as good as Kovacic when it comes to progressive passing, he is one of the best in the world. How can it be lazy if I am focusing on the data and the eye test whereas you are going off just the eye test. I could easily just say your analysis is lazy lol. It’s just a different opinion
@@AtlantisFootball I also value the data, but it absolutely needs context. But you make a fair point, analysis is open to interpretation, apologies for calling it lazy.
But progressive passing, is just passing forwards over a certain distance. Does not necessarily result in chances or goals. Le Fee creates more opportunities for his team mates.
Not saying he is a better player overall. But he would be value for money, young and can progress parts of his game further. Definitely a better squad player than United have currently
Bro...stop having requirements for a prospective new player that you dont have for current manutd players. We have very many average players like sabitzer, fred or even worse mctominay. The aim is not to get the perfect finished player. The aim is to bring in players who have the ingredients and can become that perfect player. Le fee is a better bet than kovacic or even mcallister etc especially when you consider the price. I dont even know why you are pushing this kovacic idea, we already have old midfielders in eriksen, bruno and casemiro...it doesnt make any sense to pay 30 or 40m for another old midfielder when we can pay 20m for a player like enzo le fee. Furthermore, your comparison is flawed, you got kovacics and eriksens best features ie progressive passing and you compared enzo le fee on that. How about enzo le fees best feature ie ball carrying vs those 2. We dont need another superb progressive passer in the team, but we desperately need an elite ball carrier. If we are unable to get frankie de jong, the next best option in all of Europe is enzo le fee especially given his price.
?? That’s the whole point. We want to improve the squad. You’ve got to have requirements to improve on the players we have 😂
@@AtlantisFootball yes we should (i didnt say no requirements), I said stop having impossible requirements for players linked to us. You literally want us to spend dime on someone like kovacic who is older and more expensive just becoz he is a more progressive passer by a few percents...furthermore, we already have a great progressive passer in eriksen but we dont have a ball carrier profile like enzo or frankie. Your logic doesnt make sense at all
It’s not impossible if Kovacic has those requirements
Kovacic will cost around the same and he’s only 29 not 33
Another Maddison
You’re an enemy of this club imo, you keep suggesting a player like Kovacic for us. First we signed 30y.o Casemiro now he’s 31, we should sign an injury prone Kovacic again at 29y.o when even Chelsea are signing young players like Enzo at €100m for his position. Embarrassing really
Shut up you idiot 😂😂 the fact you think a player turning 29 makes them past it says everything. Casual football fan
Kovacic would be an incredibly smart signing. As long as he's not the only midfield signing we make.
Also, never use Todd Boehly's transfer deals as an example. That's a trainwreck.
@@JohnDoe-qm8ns jajajajjajajajaaja. Why ain’t City, Liverpool, Arsenal all over him then?Why ain’t Madrid, Barcelona fighting for his signature? It’s only Man United making stupid decisions in the last 10yrs signings a rival finished players calling them world class. We’ve done it before and still didn’t learn. It’s why we’ve been a laughing stock to football world in last decade and also Talking about BOEHLY? There’s no way a sane person tells me Enzo doesn’t get in our XI. So with Enzo he’s already signed a replacement for Injury prone 29y.o Kovacic, So he wanted to cut off aged players off his team. But of course let Man United pay £30m for him as long as they sign 29y.o Sabitzer too according to you then talked about winning the EPL and UCL. Don’t let this foolish average analyst put you into delusion. Even if a 20y.o good player ain’t ready yet we should be signing them. Look at Kamavinga,Tchioumeni for example?They will be ready in at least 2/3yrs. It took Kloop 3yrs to win his first trophy at Liverpool. There’s no way I ain’t taking that if we kept improving every season under Ten Hag. Signings stop gap players like Kovacic,Eriksen,Casemiro,Sabitzer every summer ain’t winning us EPL and UCL am deadly sure about it.
City probably are looking at him but even still that’s not how you judge players lmao are you Ted Boehly
He's going to Newcastle United