Testing assumptions for Binary Logistic Regression using SPSS

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 28. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 40

  • @mehrdadbayandori285
    @mehrdadbayandori285 Před 22 dny

    This is really helpful... You mentioned a handbook in the video. What is it, and is it possible to have access to it?

  • @sevendeboer627
    @sevendeboer627 Před měsícem

    What happens when one of your interactions (Variable by LN_Variable) doesn't show up in the table? I put in 5 variables and their interactions with the log-odds, but only 4 show up. It also doesn't show up when I just add that one.

  • @kristinfeltmann6275
    @kristinfeltmann6275 Před 3 lety +2

    Regarding the third assumption, what do I do when I have a continuous variable with lots of zeros?

  • @turkaysahin3692
    @turkaysahin3692 Před 2 lety +5

    Thanks for this amazingly informative video! I am currently using SPSS 24th version and I have 16 predictors, I got the same error "the expression ends unexpectedly". I couldnt solve it, can anyone help about this issue?

  • @yuelingzheng9784
    @yuelingzheng9784 Před 2 lety +1

    Hi! What do we do when the assumption of log odds have been violated?

  • @emiliaroselli2385
    @emiliaroselli2385 Před rokem

    So helpful thank you!

  • @djmtm1
    @djmtm1 Před 3 lety +3

    When I tried to compute the new 'Probability' variable SPSS tells me 'The expression ends unexpectedly'?

    • @djmtm1
      @djmtm1 Před 3 lety +1

      It works if I don't include -1 at the start, but does that still give the correct data?

    • @knowhow3271
      @knowhow3271  Před 3 lety

      @@djmtm1 sorry for the late reply. Which version of SPSS are you using? This might be a question for the SPSS team, you do need -1.

    • @hKkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk7621
      @hKkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk7621 Před 2 lety +2

      @@djmtm1 Try reversing the minus to be after the one as in the following equation
      1- (CDF.CHISQ (MAH_1, write here your independent variable number)

  • @tobiasr4969
    @tobiasr4969 Před 3 lety +2

    Thanks for the video! I have a question, does the linearity assumption for independent variables not apply when they are only of binary type? IV is Yes/no and Outcome is also Yes/No.
    Thank you so much!

    • @knowhow3271
      @knowhow3271  Před 3 lety +2

      Hi, sorry for late reply. Yes only continuous independent variables need to be tested for the assumption of being linearly related to the log odds. So any nominal (categorical) variables don't need to be checked in this way.

  • @user-qn8pg5xw4q
    @user-qn8pg5xw4q Před 2 lety

    Thank you .your helpfull video.dear i have question .i do regression analysis my research ,but independent and dependent variables not significant and no normality .So plz tell me i do ,which analysis for my research 😁

  • @yosephyisake6579
    @yosephyisake6579 Před 2 lety

    Thanks a lot!

  • @harithfarhan5535
    @harithfarhan5535 Před 3 lety +1

    Hi there, may i know is outlier part of the assumption in binary logistic regression or is the relationship between logit continuous variables . Thank you

    • @knowhow3271
      @knowhow3271  Před 3 lety +1

      Hi, sorry for the late reply. Any continuous independent variable should be checked for linearity with the log odds. It's good practice to check for outliers but you might find some sources don't list it as an assumption, whilst others do. I think it's good to at least check, although it can be a complicated issue if you do have outliers and I would recommend reading the following article www.theanalysisfactor.com/outliers-to-drop-or-not-to-drop/

  • @smithat2626
    @smithat2626 Před 2 lety

    Thanks a lot 👍

  • @fadhlinnik
    @fadhlinnik Před rokem

    Hye, thanks for your explanation, it helped me a lot, btw, i have a question regarding the binary logistic regression, is there any ways that i can contact you?

  • @shepherdchikomana7868
    @shepherdchikomana7868 Před 2 lety +1

    hi thanks for the lecture its really useful. by the way can i have the link to the data that you tested so that i can test it here as well and see if i can understand it from my end. thanks

    • @SalamatuMohammed-on5qk
      @SalamatuMohammed-on5qk Před rokem

      Please I need this dataset you said you have to try this analysis out. Is it possible to get it from you on other social media platform? I really need it urgently. Thank you

  • @shannawielinga8207
    @shannawielinga8207 Před 3 lety

    Wow, this is awesome. Thank you so much! Just a very practical question. How do you get that table so nicely in Word? When I paste it, either it is pasted like an image or as a very skewed table.

    • @knowhow3271
      @knowhow3271  Před 3 lety +1

      Glad it was useful. Sometimes you just have to try the various paste options until one works. it might depend what version of word/SPSS you have and whether using a Mac, but I didn't do anything special

    • @shannawielinga8207
      @shannawielinga8207 Před 3 lety

      @@knowhow3271 Just the old-fashioned experimentation 😉. Got that, thanks!

    • @AbdulHamid-yw8ep
      @AbdulHamid-yw8ep Před 3 lety

      @@shannawielinga8207 We can use menu in SPSS... "File->Export" to export the output table to Excel or word format or any other format.

  • @jatinjaiswal492
    @jatinjaiswal492 Před 4 měsíci

    Ma'am when I checking my assumption of outlier and applying CDF formula in that case it is showing "the expression ends unexpectedly"
    In this case, what can i do?
    I have 7 independent variables and 3 binary dependent variables.

    • @adventureswithphi405
      @adventureswithphi405 Před 29 dny

      I am having the same problem. Did you get a solution?

    • @Kainat-j4o
      @Kainat-j4o Před 20 dny

      @@adventureswithphi405 Start the equation with 1- instead of -1 then follow the same instructions.

  • @user-sq5im3wo4t
    @user-sq5im3wo4t Před 2 lety

    عرض مميز شكرا استادة
    لو تفضلتم بترجمة باقي الفيديوات الى اللغة العربية...واريد ان اسال هل يمكن ادخال كل متغير مستقل لوحده مع متغير التابع بمعنى يتنبؤ بالنتيجة حسب كل متغير لوحده

  • @shepherdchikomana7868
    @shepherdchikomana7868 Před 2 lety

    hi can i have a copy of your handbook please and the dataset too

  • @shorouqaf5540
    @shorouqaf5540 Před 3 lety

    Thank you for the video. I have 4 independent, continuous variables and I am following your explanation to check the outliers, but when I compute variable and enter the equation then ok, I got a message said the expression ends unexpectedly. I am not sure what’s the problem and I just wanted to to make sure that the number of variables do not have a problem with the options? Thank you again

    • @knowhow3271
      @knowhow3271  Před 3 lety

      As far as I'm aware it should work with four independent variables. Can I double check that all four of your variables are scale/continuous?

    • @shorouqaf5540
      @shorouqaf5540 Před 3 lety

      @@knowhow3271 Thank you for your response. It is working know. I have another question and I would be greatly appreciated if you can help. I have identified two cases as outliers, when should I consider retaining or removing them?

    • @knowhow3271
      @knowhow3271  Před 3 lety

      @@shorouqaf5540 Sorry for the late reply. It's often hard to know, but this article gives a pretty good summary www.theanalysisfactor.com/outliers-to-drop-or-not-to-drop/

    • @tharakadealwis6234
      @tharakadealwis6234 Před 3 lety

      I got the same issue and how to resolve it?

    • @shorouqaf5540
      @shorouqaf5540 Před 3 lety +3

      @@tharakadealwis6234 Start the equation with 1- instead of -1 then follow the same instructions.