Early East Slavic History
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 04. 2024
- My second channel M. Laser Random- / @mlaserrandom
where I just upload random videos from game-plays to vlogs and more.
My Patreon- / mlaser
My Twitter- / mnlaser
Video scripts with sources are available for free on my Patreon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More Information
0:27 I am showing the Huns, Finno-Ugric Tribes, Avars and Bulgars, even though there where many more tribes that where in the area at one point or another.
2:12 The Volga Bulgars and Magyars where also vassals of the Khazars at this point.
2:53 The map of different Slavic tribes may well be inaccurate because we have only the Novgorod writings to work with and therefor we can't really pinpoint an exact map of all the different Slavic ethnic groups and where they lived. We just know they existed.
3:53 You may also find some writings where confused authors would use the word Rus' and Varangians interchangeably.
4:04 I actually meant to say crucible steel not Damascus steel as the ulfberht swords never actually where true crucible steel. They where sometimes considered as pattern welded "false Damascus" steel which is a form of crucible steel but isn't actually true Damascus steel.
8:34 It also may have been that Rurik was just a descended of one of the many Varangian chieftains that existed in the area, who than manage to conquer all the other smaller chieftains.
9:00 However he most likely conquered most of the Rus' northern lands before his death.
9:15 I show the Khazars having full control of the area between the years 882 to 912 but this wasn't completely true as the nomadic tribe that would replace them later the Pechenegs already had established a hold on the Khazar Northern lands.
9:19 Oleg also set off on few raiding expeditions and also allegedly besieged Constantinople.
9:41 There are many more interpretations of when Oleg lived, died and what happened during that time but this one seemed to most likely to me.
9:52 And also in to the Khazar lands.
10:12 Laws regarding to collecting tributes, most likely connected to the fact that her husband died while doing that.
10:34 The Pechenegs allied with the Rus' and helped them conquer the Khazars and that is why they where able to establish them self in the lower Ukraine region after the Khazar destruction.
12:25 Vladimir actually conquered Kiev from which Yaropolk ran away. It was while on this run Vladimir killed his brother.
13:09 As told to us through the primary chronicle so whether he actually said it or not we may never no.
#History #Slavs #Rus' #Russian #Ukraine #Belarus
Vladimir didnt pick Orthodoxy because "churches were lavish", he did so because he first considered Catholicism and concluded that Pope meddled too much in the state business, whereas the Orthodox clergy was perfectly happy to mind their own business as long as they had their privileges.
Still makes for a funny story
@@thehammerite9437 Sure there was, just wasnt official yet. But Byzantine and Roman rites were absolutely rivals and competing to convert still pagan realms.
Thank you, That triggered me as an Orthodox and Rus' History Enjoyer (idk what to say but you understand what I mean)
Also, in orthodoxy, the religious head of a country is picked by that country’s ruler, which is another power grab from the main head of power
Volodymyr is correct spelling.
Very nice. I was doing some research into the early Rurik Dynasty awhile back in preparation for the big Eastern European Royal family tree I'm doing later this year and this helps put things in perspective. Your channel is great because most history channels focus primarily on Western Europe.
@@MLaserHistory My usual way of handling such things is to go with the best guess and then throw in a question mark 😀
No, not so nice. A LOT OF MAPS ARE INACCURATE. Balts settled around 1000 far more to the east and Finno- Ugrians to the south. Please, no eastern slavs nationalism.
Interviewer: so tell me Vladimir of Novgorod, why did you convert to Orthodox Christianity?
Vladimir: Well I don’t like being not drunk so that left Islam out of the question. I was thinking about Judaism but the fact that its followers couldn’t hold Jerusalem reminded me too much of Sviatoslavs’ recent holdings being taken from him. Then I thought, why not Christianity? But then I needed to decide which one. I took one look at an Orthodox Church and was instantly captivated! I took another look at a Catholic Church and knew which religion I wanted to practice.
Interviewer: .............ok
I still cant belive that something so important was decide by one man and his feeling... Trust me my subjects I know what is good for you.
I think he decided to take Christianity because Byzantium was their main trade partner and a lot of Slavs(Bolgars and Serbs) already had been converted to it
@n. фффвär eat drink man woman foreskin ...all those matters, if you design a Religion you better keep that in mind
@@argumentativelysound2001 As far as I read (from Russian sources, so chance of bias) first he decided to take Eastern Christianity, then he thought being asked to be converted is better from a political standpoint, and so decided to go through with the marriage. And I prefer readings where Eastern Christianity was the cause of the marriage due to the former having quite a lot of other reasons (strong trade connections to Byzantine Empire, Eastern Clergy being subject to local authorities unlike their Western counterpart, etc.)
@@argumentativelysound2001 My comment may be slightly off-mark because I am not %100 sure I understood yours. I find your reading of the situation unconvincing; Helga was a Christian but failed to convert even her son Svyatoslav (Vladimir's father), who cited being afraid of losing respect with his troops and ended up fighting a war with the Byzantines. In this context, Vladimir sending delegations to other countries looks like making sure that a possible choice of religion would be supported by his nobles, whose help he'd later use in Christianization of the rest of the country (while Helga had previously been content with being Christian ruler of a Pagan country). The marriage looks like part of a wider trend and giving it precedence is weird.
I am not even mentioning that Povest' asserts 987 as the year of the boyar council where Vladimir decided to accept Christianity (because Povest' is not %100 reliable).
"Drinking is the joy of all the Rus'." Classic.
It's was saying in 16 cetery. In Kievan Rus people not drink so much
vodka comes from poland
Yes, Thats one of the reasons they didn't want to be islamic
@@ze_baronkrigler7611 christians arnt meant to drink either
@@wielkapol9469 Thats straight up wrong
We need more stuff on central and Eastern Europe. It’s stuff we don’t get in school. Generally if it’s not about England or classical stuff it’s like it never happened. So good work 😀
bro you must be american or something. Even I from Asia have learned general history of central/eastern/also US itself just because our education minister thinks it's vital and I agree. Like wtf are you even from
@@gots0359 UK. So they teach you history, but not how to not be rude. Bro. Maybe work on that English grammar of yours. It needs some work.
@@silentone11111111 my bad for not knowing my third language on a perfect level grammar bro. Plus i wasnt rude i was just amazed by how your minstery of education treats you. Like how come you don't even learn anything outside of england lol
this is the easiest and simplest explanation thanks man.
@@MLaserHistory you responded thanks mate
Yes
The way the Slavs adopted the Rus’ name is interesting. It’s similar to the Romano-Celtic people of Gaul becoming the “French”, isn’t it?
I mean it is interesting but not unusual. Name is just a meaningless word unless someone gives it meaning. That meaning can be altered and changed and as such names can be abandoned or adopted very easily. That is why many societies have names that they identify with very strongly that, in etymological terms, don't come from their current language family.
It's the same as the Ukrainia got their name from the Russians Okraina - an outskirts.
@@rty3751 No, it's more like Vkraina - which means country in our language. So our country name is like supreme version of word - homeland
@@olgert3551 cope
@@olgert3551 Yeah, right 😂😂😂😂
Slavic history is very underrated, great video!
Bell Witch!!!
This is a great addition to one of my favorite series ever! Thank you!
I love how every ruler becomes a saint after their conversion to christianity :D
Again great video, I don't think I've ever learned about a huge slavic empire in the east, that's pretty interesting!
those videos are seriously underrated with such an effort in them
Your videos on early slavic history are amongst my favourite on youtube. Three suggestions for future videos: 1) Medieval Bulgaria 2) Medieval Serbia 3) Ottoman conquest of the Balkans
Very nice, you really need more subs man. Your videos are amazing.
Your videos are extremely good and I love watching them.
I am shocked this is the first time I'm seeing your videos. You're really good. subscribed
You make very impressive videos. Keep it up!
Very interesting video. Haven't studies much about early slavic history!
This is the best video you ever made !
Excellent video! Thank you!
Hi im new here and you channel is nice.
Good job!
Awesome video, thanks for your work.
Well done
Rurik's first town was indeed Staraya Ladoga later pictured in your map, not Novgorod. Novgorod was founded a century/century and a half later, more or less
13:19 I think the main reasons were that he didn’t want to submit to the power of the Pope + orthodox Christianity claimed that the power of a ruler was holy
The main reason was becoming closer friends with the byzantinian empire
My girlfriend is Belarusian. Now I know why she lives in a hut and hibernates during the winter. Thank you.
Does she really?:)
@@user-bf1yq6oj8z Why of course.
based berry collector gf
brain4breakfast and M. Laser upload a video on the same day? Is this heaven?
Awesome video. You covered a lot of controversial
topics , probably in the best possible way . One small correction though, the first law reforms in Eastern Europe were done by Krum of Bulgaria (or possibly by his son Omurtag) Although ofcource if you exclude the Bulgarian possessions north of the Danube at the time , Bulgaria could have been considered as part of Southern Europe.
@@gagaspraga8194 Han what is that ? the title is Kanasubigi. And what we see from their inscriptions the Bulgarians never ever put their names infront of their titles like the turks and mongols. And as of the tatars they firstly arrived in Europe in the 13th century and the first sources about Bulgarians living in Europe (The Caucasus) date back to
the 3rd century
@M.Laser The knowledge of making Damascus Steel did not come from India, but the Abbasid Caliphate. Syria was as a centre of sword manufacturing even in the Roman era, But the metal that was used was from India.
@q1k9i3l0ä5å Yes, but only partially. The most important part of forging steel are the chemical reactions that turn iron into steel afterwards. In other words, it was more about the process of making the steel, rather than about the ore.
I made a mistake there, the correction is in the description.
"I actually meant to say crucible steel not Damascus steel as the ulfberht swords never actually where true Damascus steel. They where sometimes considered as pattern welded "false Damascus" steel which is a form of crucible steel but isn't actually true Damascus steel."
And crucible steel and it's production comes from southern India and Sri Lanka, from there it traveled across the middle eastern trade routs and eventually up the Eastern European waterways all the way to Scandinavia.
Put off by Islam because "Drinking is the joy of all Rus. We cannot exist without that pleasure." What a wise man.
wait wat why so small amount of viewers this is so underrated
RigbY TheAnimal he is a new speaker. I’m sure his popularity will grow with this quality
Very interesting,,,A good effort...
great video! hungary next !! or the romances people in the balkans + romania
Very nice!
really nice, and you don't sound so monotone in this one
Are you planning on following up these videos with middle Slavic and late Slavic history
Maybe in the future yes, but for now there's just not enough time since I can't do youtube full time.
I hope there will be continuation, you left at the most interesting part.
Eastern slav' history amateur here. My imho notes:
1) Expansion to east was actually much slower and at described times area was (presumably) significantly smaller in east and north parts (then in 2:00). Finno-ugric population by time was assimilated by slavic communities, so yes, it looked like in top north at 2:00, but at the position of letter c in words Finno-ugric should be much less slavs and more finno-ugric peoples (and slavs near Volga in 9 century?). Also, dencity should be showed to be much sparce then shown
2) Presumably baltic peoples also had more land then shown on 2:00
3) Here at 2:20 map looks more accurate in terms of slav spread in pre-11cen. (If without 2 eastern tribes - i would say it will be pretty close in 8-9 c.). However due to common tribe distribution maps, even through neighbourhood is right, tribes commoly drawed in different places (mostly bit to east), for example main Severian city - Chernihiv - located here between Drevlans and Polans, i.e. Severians waaay eastward then they should be
Upd: Also see video's description, here some words about that i said here, so it may be considered that it was 'fixed' :D
Actually very liked this slavic series, especially part about western slavs, good job!
As far as I know, the whole "Vladimir rejected islam because of the ban on drinking" is mostly a legend, Vladimir's main motivation appears to be the growing closeness of the Kievan Rus' to Byzantine Empire, which was their most important trade partner and biggest, most developed regional power. Building ties with them really made the most sense.
Saint Vladzimir was also a rapist. One of his victims was Belarusian princess Rahnieda of Połack.
@@Name-og4th Trying to be shocked over here that a 10th century warlord would kill a man for slighting him and forcibly marry his daughter, but somehow I can't muster the outrage. I mean, it's a horrible story, but not something I wouldn't expect from one of the descendants of the goddamn Olga of Kiev.
(For the record, I am not really Christian, so the title of "saint" doesn't hold much moral weight for me, unless it's really given for being exceptionally charitable, as opposed to, say, being the ruler that forced their people to get baptized.)
Please do history of Finland, thanks! Awesome channel!!
Please don't! There's already heaps of uneducated storytellers doing the same thing!
Will you cover rest of slavic history or is this it
@@MLaserHistory good to know
concerning the avars, which rivers and other geographic features defined the extent of their domain and their sphere of influence at their greatest extent?
South would be today's northern Greek Border (Although this hold on the whole of the Balkans was brief), west would be the eastern ending of the Austrian Alps and the Ore Mountains in Czechia. North we don't know all we know is that they didn't reach the Baltic sea and East again we don't know exactly all we know is that they bordered the Khazars so the border is usually put somewhere between the Dnieper and Don rivers.
I'd love a video about the balts
Hi, thanks for a very clear explanation. Can you cite your sources for this video? I don't mean primary sources necessarily
Thx for map on preview
One thing tho
The vikings success in the slavik lands happened only due to them mixing in with slavs something that history got wrong but archeology shows to be true that Rurik and Rus didn’t just rule slavs but mixed in with slavs creating Rus thus even slavs proudly called them self Rus
" *WELL YOU SEE IT ALL STARTED IN 882, WHEN RURIK-* "
you should do an episode on battles like agencourt
does anyone know anything about the other East Slavic Chiefdoms? Also, these are really great videos
If they existed there are no written records about them so unless a new discovery is made we won't know anything about them.
@@MLaserHistory what about Askold and Dir? P.S. Great video!
@@user-ye8lb7uh2u Those were varangians too. Askold and Dyr are Scandinavian names
North-east sloveny from Ladoga and Novgorod were north-west slavs, colonising the trade from Baltic Sea to the south by settling on the north part of Volga river enter. As well as south East Slavs as Radimichi and Vyatichi did the same thing on Oka river (middle part to enter Volga). There were no much differences in slavs tribes and there languages or whatever, but they practiced different types of social hierarchy (Dnipro was more patriarchal clans, east was more independent communities).
Could you put time stamps within the video? It would make it a lot easier to follow in an historical perspective.
Thanks.
Do you have any explanation for the connection between the Slavic culture and the Vedic culture? There is some solid indication that these two are very much related.
Well I guess because the people of indo-european culture, due to Kurgan hypothesis, were from the steppes of modern day Ukraine and Russia
Basically, all accounts that mentioned Vedic culture didn't go too much in detail, and the archaeological findings were scarce and technically the pottery in the supposed Vedic region was either the same as Slavic pottery culture or heavily influenced, by it meaning they are either only a part of the Slavic culture or were driven out of their land by goths or vandals during great resettlement.
Dear Sir thank you for the video. I want to ask you the next question. Did the Slavic people merge or did they absorb the Scythians and Sarmats? And please indicate the sources for the answer. Thank you!
13:04 rational drinker
what about volga bulgaria?
"The Eastern Orthodox Christians have the prettiest churches, so I guess I'll convert to that."
@Внук Ельцина not Russia-_-
I might be not the first one pointing this out, so pardon me for not reading all the comments, but on the timestamp 2:19 you show "Rusyns/Dulebes" over the Carpathians. I find this rather misleading, as we do have some confirmations that they called themselves White Croats (or at least were called that way by neighbors), but we don't have solid proof that local Slavic people are in the Carpathians would call themselves Rusyns at least by XII century.
Yes the Rusyn identity came in much later and it would be more appropriate to just leave the name of White Croats there as that is an attested name in the sources.
4:05 wait didn't damascus steel come from damascus i'm so confused
read the description
There is a confusion of a damascus steel and the one which is composed of alternating layers of two or more different steels ( which is commonly called "damascus steel" as above). The actual damascus steel was made in and around Damascus and it didn't "come" anywhere as it's secret was lost (or a particular high-quality ore used for its manufacture was finally exhausted).
Can't help noticing how in the end you must be referring to comments of these emissaries about them feeling "like in heaven" in Hagia Sophia, but their words are often interpreted (at least in Russian historical tradition) as not about lavishness of the temple but rather about a special religious ceremony Byzantines put up to impress them. But, I still really liked the vid and found it well-researched.
Also, a fun bit of speculation: the time Vladimir was making the faith choices were just a couple of decades after the "special" Pope John XII and the broader "saeculum obscurum," and a couple of Russian historians speculate rumors of these happenings did not really strengthen Western Church's appeal in the eyes of Rus' (not saying "weakened it" because accepting Christianity from Rome rather than Constantinople was already unlikely due to much stronger trade and cultural ties with the latter).
I knew that Ivan the Terrible’s hijinks would come up!
if there was a "new gorod" then it must be old too and it was. It name is Ladoga. the first kind of capital.
Early history of the Greeks!
East Slav gang
Go Rurik!
The rurikid dynasty founded both the Kievan Rus and the Russian Tsardom, which Ivan the terrible created hundreds of years later after expelling the mongols
Fun Fact: Ivan and nominally his son Fyodor were the last rulers of the Rurikid dynasty, meaning the dynasty lasted over 500 years. Also Ivan styled himself Czar (i.e. Caesar) because he was literally the grandson of a Byzantine princess, niece of the last Byzantine Emperor. By Ivan’s time the Paleologos family was effectively extinct so he had as good a claim as anyone to the title.
He didn't claim to be a Byzantine emperor descendant and because of that, the title Tsar wasn't born due to those reasons. It was rather because of "muh third Rome" larp after the fall of Constantinople. AKA "Rome is gone and so is constantinople now, therefore the only true heir of Rome is Moscow!", that was his reasoning@@mikeg2306
13:21 if he only knew about the Gothic style of architecture
I wrote a paper last year about the authorship of the Primary Chronicle. There are many inconsistencies and my basic conclusion is that while we don't necessarily know who wrote it, it was almost certainly not Nestor
I wonder what script and language russians spoke before 8th century
It’s unknown as writing only became widespread with glagotic and cyrillic both of which were invented as acceptable substitutes in which to translate latin into by the orthodox church invented by monk methodus and cyril if there was a script in pagan rus it is long since lost or never existed at all as the pagans mostly used degradable materials and most were destroyed in the campaigns to covert east europe ie northern crusades as well as other revolts and wars
It was probably something similar to old church slavonic linguistically which was close to baltic languages
Imagine Russia these days being jewish lol
Edit: well oh..
U know that half of communist goverment were jews?
@@czowiekbezperspektyw4628 thats why i ironically said "oh wait"
@42 No its not. Half of soviet goverment were jews. Stalin wife also
@42 www.timesofisrael.com/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish/
Trocky was a jew
Brezhen said : "I am a Jew. I want to live in the Jewish state. That is my right, just as it is the rights of a Ukrainian to live in the Ukraine, the right of a Russian to live in Russia, the right of a Georgian to live in Georgia. I want to live in Israel. That is my dream, that is the goal not only of my life but also of the lives of hundreds of generation that preceded me, of my ancestors who were expelled from their land. I want to my children to study in the Hebrew language. I want to read Jewish papers, I want to attend a Jewish theatre. What is wrong with that? What is my crime ...?"
@@czowiekbezperspektyw4628 Boris Kochubievsky said that not Brezhnev.
The two main defining traits of the Slavs, there's many of them and they like drinking so much their king went window shopping for a faith a ruled out those who prohibited alcohol as it was too strict.
2:13 You pointed the Slavs strongly to the east, Finno-Ugrics lived along the Volga
Finno Ugrics lived everywhere in northern European Russia.
I’m Catholic but I’m Slav I’m from the west Bosnia and Herzegovina not far away from Croatia
Princess of Polotsk: I won't marry you, you bastard!
Vladimir: well see about that.
And then he did the only sensible thing.
Busy pwning each other in the 21st Century...
Vladimir d hardcore
You only went through the kingdoms you didn't go through the groupijgs of slavs in that region at all
Dont rus come from the finnish name for the Swedish
Saint Olga, patron saint of mass arson
9:15
Voronezh was built by Peter the Great. It cannot be on the map THAT early.
I live here k?
It's not the Voronezh but a Voronezh. A Slavic town settlement has been found in that area on the Voronezh river dating back to around the 8th century. Plus Voronezh was mentioned by the primary chronicle so it definitely existed during the Middle Ages.
@@MLaserHistory , May I ask you what kind of sources you have used to provide this historical review? Today, many Ukrainian and Russian historians claim that Voronezh and Russia in general are descendants of finno-ugric settlements but not Slavs.
@@MLaserHistory by a Voronezh you mean some settlement by the river, right? I'll try to contact someone who has more knowledge about the town than I do, but the museums, schools and administration have the opinion of Voronezh being 400-450 years old (there is a proper year but I don't remember it). If it was *some* settlement, however, it might've been anything. We even have one of the biggest early-human settlements in Kostyonki village, so some slavic settlement is not something unbelievable
@@MLaserHistory oh, and also, can you provide sources? The pages of primary chronicle would be awesome to read
Primary chronicle 249, mentions Ryazan, prince of Yaropolk, fleeing to Voronezh after losing a battle.
------------------------
"a number of settlements. In the lower reaches of the river, a unique Slavic town-planning complex of the 8th - early 11th century was discovered, which covered the territory of the present city of Voronezh and its environs"
Wikipedia sights there sources with this and considering I have read about it in other English sources (that I don't really have access to at the moment as libraries are closed) I have no reason to not believe it.
В. П. Загоровский. "Воронежская историческая энциклопедия". Воронеж, 1992. Стр. 53.
А. З. Винников, А. Т. Синюк. "Дорогами тысячелетий: Археологи о древней истории Воронежского края". Издание 2-е. Воронеж, 2003. Стр. 185-187, 236-242.
Н. А. Тропин. "Южные территории Чернигово-Рязанского порубежья в XII-XV вв." Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора исторических наук. Москва, 2007.
П. А. Попов. "Воронеж: древнее слово и древние города, а также древние леса и древние реки России". Воронеж, 2016.
I have a very historic name :)
Did pagan slavs ever settle the Ural Mountains
no, they never got that far as pagans
How far east did east slavic pagans expand I can find almost no information the extent of eastern expansion
Velikiy Novgorod first mentioned in 859 AD in its own town's Chronicles.
By the way there is the town of Staraya Ladoga witch is connected with Novgorod region and Orik (Rurik) dynasty as well, and it was founded in at least in 750 by slav tribes.
So actually historic Rurik's Novgorod can be also "Rurikovo gorodische" that is located few kilometers otside of Velikiy Novgorod (The Varangian name of the city Holmgård or Holmgard (Holmgarðr or Holmgarðir) is mentioned in Norse Sagas as existing at a yet earlier stage, but the correlation of this reference with the actual city is uncertain. Originally, Holmgård referred to the stronghold, now only 2 km (1.2 miles) to the south of the center of the present-day city, Rurikovo Gorodische.)
“Vladimir killed Olga’s father and forced her to marry him, anyway.” Sounds like another Vladimir’s tactic of choice
13:08 And Vodka would later corrupt Russia.
Водки до семнадцатого века не существовало! Тогда пили медовуху!
@@user-jx4il2wr2q Дело говоришь
@@negotive4303its potato so obviously it would not exist in 9th century rus though the varagians vikings were notorious drunkards often drinking themselves to death
So you know like modern russia
Being slav....That's great!
This is as much history as Game of Thrones....
fuck i want to know what happens next
Empire Lechitow 500BC please educate you self
I'll write down the list of Rus' monarchs mentioned in this video and their deeds because writing helps memorizing. Maybe someone will find this helpful:
Rurik (862 - 869) - conquered one of the northern Slavic chiefdoms and established himself as the ruler there. Died.
Oleg (879 - _940_ ) - Rurik's kin. Acted as a regent for Rurik's son Igor. Did a lot of conquest including Kyiv, which became the realm's new capital. Lost a war against Igor over the throne.
Igor ( _912_ - 945) - Rurik's son. Won a war against Oleg over the throne. Fought Byzantines and Khazars. Was brutally killed by his subjects from the Drevlia tribe for demanding too much tribute.
Olga (945 - 960) - Igor's wife. Sviatoslav's mother and regent. Avenged her husband by burning down the Drevlian capital. Centralized power. Enacted law reforms. Adopted Christianity.
Sviatoslav (960 - 972) - Was pagan. Fought the bordering nomadic tribes. Lost a battle to the Byzantines. Was ambushed and killed by their allies - nomadic Pechenegs.
Yaropolk (972 - 978) - Sviatoslav's son. Defeated his brothers Oleg (killed) and Vladimir (fled) in a succession crisis. Lost all the conquests of his dad. Was killed by Vladimir.
Vladimir (978 - 1015) - Sviatoslav's bastard son. Was defeated by his brother Yaropolk in a succession crisis and fled to Norway. Gathered an army there and retook the throne. Reconquered some of his dad's conquests. Converted the country to Orthodox Christianity.
"Drinking is the joy of all Rus..."
This, gentlemen, is why nowadays we don't have a chechnya in the size of Russia
imagine a muslim Russia....
Русские это православные славяне, а татары да. Но у татаров есть отдельная регион и они не русские ес что.
@@isadanjan4762 это правда
@@ludwigschneider2258 Ты идиот
Moscows 20 percent muslim
It's amazing how a throwaway decision could've vastly changed Jewish history as we know it.
Slavic tribe never settled on Volga River region.There are ugro-finnish settlements, their descendants are russians
Why the Rus convert to Orthodox.
Simple, *VODKA*
No Vodka No Russki.
Do not say Vladimier, right to say Volodymyr. So it is written in the Tale of Nestor
1) It's Vladimir, not Vladimier or Vlaedamaer;
2)Old East Slavic language had a lot of dialects, and, to be fair, even OES' successor languages had dialects, like Russian language had 24 dialects, so there is several "right" ways to pronounce some words.
No it is literally written "Володымер" in the chronicle (VolodymEr, with an E instead of a second Y)@@PseudonymsAreGovno
Great video, you obv did lots of research, check out my animation on European history ^^
Thumbnail Map ist wrong
I like those tridents. One is depicted on my passport cover. I’m proud to be a Ukrainian.
Kievan Rus' is one of the coolest names for a kingdom lmao. Maybe this is why Putin has his eyes on Ukraine lol
You mean that's why my gov the USA did a coup to make sure Slavs were no more 😬😬
@@havanascp9602Strange coup, no military, literally MILLIONS of people on the streets.. That's called a revolution bud, and if it rly was a coup, WHICH IT WASNT. WHy DID RUSSIA RECOGNISE THE ELECTIONS THAT FOLLOWED? So Russia recognised the COUP? lol...That's not to say that western powers didn't support it, but it would have happened with them or with out them...Ukrainians have rebelled god knows how many times against the authorities in their history, usually its foreign authorities...Russians even gave us the nickname " Buntovshchikki'. " THOSE WHO RAISE REBELLIONS".!
You are talking about something you don’t know) There was no Kievan Rus, there was just Rus. The name Kievan Rus was given by historians in the 20th century to determine the specific period of the existence of Great Russia.
@@user-fe8du3ig7n It does not matter when exactly the name Russia appeared. Some states change their names over time) And it does not even matter where and from whom Russia took part of its culture) So all the wet dreams remained in Ukraine, did the smart guy catch on?
@@alekshukhevych2644 people of Donbass and Crimea not supporting the thing. You have received natural consequences. When one part of the country, outside the law, usurps power, the other part of the country opposes.
Great video ..but basicly the russians are descendants of drunk swedish vikings that sailed in the wrong direction :)