Ultimate Thermal Comparison | Halo Atlas Thermion Trail & Axion
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 11. 2019
- Direct comparison of the N-Vision Halo LR 50mm, N Vision Atlas 100mm, Pulsar Thermion XP50, Pulsar Trail XP50, Pulsar Axion XM30 and Axion XM38.
N-Vision Halo LR 50mm ► bit.ly/HaloLR50...
N-Vision Atlas 100mm ► bit.ly/Atlas100...
Pulsar Thermion XP50 ►bit.ly/Thermion...
Pulsar Trail XP50 ► bit.ly/TrailXP5...
Pulsar Axion XM30 ► bit.ly/AxionXM3...
Pulsar Axion XM38 ► bit.ly/AxionXM3...
► Click Here to SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/Subscrib...
PLAYLISTS
► Our Most Popular Videos: bit.ly/UNVMostP...
► Our Latest Videos: bit.ly/UNVLates...
► Top Coyote Hunting Videos: bit.ly/TopCoyot...
► Top Hog Hunting Videos: bit.ly/TopHogHu...
VISIT US AT OUR WEBSITE
► bit.ly/Ultimate...
ABOUT US
Ultimate Night Vision is an industry leader in night vision, thermal imaging and digital NV devices. Night vision is not just a profession for us, it is our passion. Here in Texas, we are fortunate enough to be able to use NV and thermal scopes for hog hunting, coyote hunting, and hunting other predators and varmints at night. The firsthand knowledge gained through hunting with NVD's on a regular basis allows us to provide accurate and relevant information to our customers.
We carry a wide variety of optics from all major manufacturers including Trijicon, Pulsar, Flir, Armasight, L3, Harris and more. We strive to provide unbiased information to aid customers in the decision-making process.
We also have a nationwide rental program which gives customers the unique opportunity to test and compare various devices under real-world conditions before committing to a large purchase.
Our channel features product reviews, instructional videos, comparisons, and plenty of actual hunting footage.
#thermalscope #nightvision #pulsar - Sport
Incredibly misleading and horrible comparison... I can't believe you guys published this. Either get your vision checked, or morals... I'm not sure which is off in this instance but one of the 2 apparently is. The Halo LR simply blows away the Pulsars with respect to clarity and definition. Are you guys trying to unload Pulsars right now or what? Sorry for being so critical, but I'm just dumbfounded by this blatantly poor comparison!
A few things: We sell all of these scopes. What would I have to gain by posting a misleading comparison? What are you claiming is misleading about the video? Are you saying I altered the video to make the N-Vision scopes look worse? Or I somehow made the Pulsar scopes look better than they really are? Rather than questioning my morals and my visual acuity, which makes absolutely no sense btw, maybe you should question your own logic and critical thinking and figure out why you would be so triggered by an innocuous comparison video.
Ultimate Night Vision correct me if I’m wrong, this is a comparison of the recording capabilities, field of view, and other things of that sort. Not the actual clarity seen through the optics.
UNV.... In all candor.... that's exactly what this video left me thinking... what's going on. It clearly states in the title that it's a Ultimate Thermal Comparison.... and I've felt that you all have always very fairly represented the optics you have reviewed or put to use in the field. So.... if you said this was an FOV comparison, or a video output comparison, etc, one might walk away understanding your objectives for this video. However, by stating that this is the Ultimate Thermal Comparison, and then providing results such as this, which are clearly not representative of what these optics are capable of with respect to what most end users consider as primarily important, (clarity of the optic).... then I suppose it's leaves the question... what is the purpose for the obvious discrepancy. Those of us who are familiar with these optics are obviously going to speak up and say... .what gives. Those that don't know are going to thank you guys for the information you provided... leaving this video with the impression that the pulsars blow away the Halo LR, which you and I both know is obviously not the case. So perhaps a more accurate title or voicing explaining what your objectives are for the video might provide viewers and those combing for information about the optics they plan to throw down their hard earned cash for... with good information as to make sure they get an optic that meets their needs. Personally, if I didn't know better.... I'd assume that the Halo LR wasn't worth the $7500 it commands... when in fact, after having been behind it as well as the Pulsar and Trijicons, I absolutely believe it does.
@@jamesbostock9986 I don't understand why you think the Halo looks bad in the video. Are you watching it in low resolution on your phone? Did you watch the video of me walking down the road?
@@ThermalFeed There will often be some differences in what the recording looks like compared to what you see through the eyepiece, however the Halo footage was filmed through the eyepiece and the footage is a good representation of what I was seeing through the scope that night. The only scope that was really handicapped in this comparison is the Atlas 100mm which was recorded through the video output to a DVR. We are the only vendor that offers the N-Vision Atlas 100mm, so any claims that I attempted to make it look worse are pretty silly.
No music , no bull , just great side by side comparison . But what really amazes me is the amount of time and patience it took to set up , film and edit all of this !!! You are awesome !!! This is the video I've been waiting years for.
Outstanding comparison. Kudos to whomever thought this up. I know it took a lot of editing and coordinating. This answers questions I didn't know I had. The N-Vision gear has outstanding definition on the animals, but maybe the background is a little washed out in comparison. The Pulsar gear has less definition on the animals, but the background is more defined. And I can definitely see the difference between the Thermion and the Trail. I will remember this video when I call to purchase. Great stuff. This is your online sales brochure when you have customers asking questions about the differences.
What a super fine job on this video and the ton of research done to bring us the results. No where else can you see this type of presentation. Thanks a million
Thank you 🍻
Great comparison...n vision atlas, the best in my opinion.
The resolution of the Atlas line is very impressive. I own an XP50 Trail. If i had it to do over, I'd likely go the same way, or with the Thermion, though. The multiple and significant software advantages, longer battery life, and better durability more than make up for the slightly reduced resolution of the XP50 Trail/Thermion, IMO. Especially given the distances most people are going to be shooting, with Thermal sights. I'd imagine very few people regularly shoot beyond 150 yards with it. If I was regularly shooting out beyond 250 or so, it might be a different story.
I had to slow this down and get a bowl of popcorn 🍿 to enjoy this.. Til the beer got to me near frozen! It's was like watching ET for the fist time on IMAX!
Woooooo I've been waiting for something like this! Thank you!
Interesting, for me it has to be the N-Vision Atlas, it has the most detail, of them all.
From one end to the next... very good work channel-holder.
no bs and no marketing gimmicks, just let reality stand on its own two feet and let the recordings speak for itself. (great)
well done, in giving me an overview.
subscribed and will take a look at some of your other videos if it is this level of compare work.
and sure the N-vision both looks stellar, but they are also in another price ballpark in regards to Pulsars 640x480 variant and not to mention the 320x240 versions.
Thanks for putting out this video. It was good to see so many thermals side by side.
This! THIS! This is what I was looking for!! 😁 Thank you fellas!! (Wow, so many exclamation points!)
For the cherry on top of this Deliciousness... Toss in that XP38 Thermion with a splash of PTS536. 😂
Thankyou for the comparison . I know how much effort it took to do this.
Anyone looking at this needs to remember that depth of field is still going to be a thing even though it's thermal imaging. Some of the images that are being blasted in the comments actually have fantastic clarity.... just not focused in the right spot. Others that seemed to have "better" image quality simply had a larger depth of field. Some commenters may benefit from looking again at the background, not the target animals. The focus simply needed to be adjusted closer in.
Am I wrong about this? Is it a parallax thing?
N-Vision is just wow
Your video is like finding a diamond under mountain
After watching video and reading discussion below am still not conviced why should I pay for Atlas 25 - $5,795.00 if I can get an Axion 38 for twice lower price. Resolution differs but image is good for the price in Axion.
The Axion is small, light and will give you a long detection range for the money. The Atlas 25mm is kind of a different animal - higher resolution and clearer image, a lot less magnification, and much wider field of view.
Boss man, that's way too much, too fast for my brain and eyes to process in one go. But thanks for the great comparison. Now wheres that dang pause button.
Hi, very valuable information! I with you can compare Thermion XP38 with Thermion XP50 in the same format. Thank you.
АФИГЕННО ПОЗНОВАТЕЛЬНОЕ ВИДЕО!
Вот ещё бы с вами на работу выйти, кабанчика пострелять! 🤝💪
Awesome comparison, I think The Atlas has better clarity than the Pulsar, but that is just my two cents.
Great video don’t listen to some of these people’s negative input it was a great comparison and loved to see the quality and Clarity difference. Halo blew it out of the water
Blew it out of the water is definitely an exaggeration. Its the best image, but it should be. Its more germanium, and 20% more in cost. It would be a catastrophe of a product if it WASNT better. But i'll take the thermion xp50 and use the extra money to put towards an entirely new rifle and/or suppressor! All day every day.
Love the comparison
Maybe it is the way the halo lr was recorded but I've noticed everyone's videos look different. Some look yellow or blue and some look white like the atlas in this video
Really good comparison, youve done well setting up a test like this. That shit aint easy!
I see a winner here and its the halo. I can only compare my thermion xp38 to your thermion xp50 but the video is similar to what im seeing. The difference between my xq38 accolade and my thermion xp38 leaves me wanting to get rid of the accolade for a bino that replicates what i see through the thermion.
Halo looks like its got the goods and i didnt even know it existed before now.
hello according to you which is the best? xp50 or halo lr? thank you hello from Corsica
really useful video, thanks for posting it.
Thanks for the video, I've just started look for one of these this video helps
Wow really liked this video. Would really like to see videos for scopes about the same price point this way. If there is i havent seen them. What dvr is on the halo?
Lots to learn from this
Like what? How to deceive people and make a subpar thermal look better than a top notch thermal in a video lol. This video is trash and misleading
I think what I learned is that either UNV had someone editing that needs their eyes examined, or that they are ok with blatantly misrepresenting thermal optic clarity. Guys that actually use or have used these thermals will recognize how far off this comparison is...Guys that don't, will be left with a total misrepresentation of the actual true clarity these optics actually provide.
Nick Chaney this isn’t showing the clarity as seen through the optic, it’s showing the clarity that can be recorded. I’m more interested in how the field of view compares throughout the different options.
Boss Predator Acoustics unless you perfectly mount a recording device behind the optic, you’re not going to accurately represent the optics clarity
@@ThermalFeed I absolutely agree... and even then, some video editing may be required to match the recorded video to what is seen through the eyepiece. Even using an LPMR-T, there are issues with clarity sometimes between the top and bottom of the optic... as well as screen distortion to contend with. I believe that the issue here is if this is the Ultimate Thermal Comparison, users walk away with an inaccurate perception of these optics. If I stated that this was the Ultimate Truck Comparison and then showed a Chevy 2 wheel drive making up a huge hill... and a Toyota 4 wheel drive that couldn't make it half way up... I'm sending a message. The critical question I kept thinking is... the message being received is inaccurate, which leads me then to wonder... WHY?
Thank you very much
This was really interesting
If you had to choose 1 thermal scope for pigs, fox and coyote hunting, what would it be?
And let me add, AR in 300blk and under $5k.
Pulsar Trail or Thermion XP50 would be my choice $5k and under
Thanks for your input.
Nice test , pee pants running like a boss 😂
Thx 😊🖖
They’re all amazing tech
Ютуб начал автоматически переводить название роликов или что, почему я вижу описание и название на русском?
Можете ли вы перевести это на английский? Не многие понимают русский язык. Спасибо.
CZcams began to automatically translate the name of the videos, why do I see the description and title in Russian?
thank.
Это только если так настроенно на канале .
Do you how the N-vision Halo (XRF) stacks up against the oasys UTM? Would it be worth switching or stick with what I have? Anything helps. Thank you
Good video. Gotta be able to see and find the bacon in order to get the bacon!
Very helpful thanks
Hi. What do you think about GuideTrack IR? It has 400x300 sensor.
Are you taking ocular video with the Halos ??
Nice comparison ! 👍
$8,495.00 . . . . I'll have to save up or make my own.
Hola .no ablo ingles pero ocupo comprar una de esas como puedo conseguirla gracias por su informacion
Not sure of when the side by side video's are all at the same yardage's kind confusing , shows 150 at the bottom but 100mm on one thermal,,,,not sure what is what.
The yardage is the same for each optic. The Atlas 100mm is the model name of that unit. It has a 100mm focal length.
Wait I'm confused....where's the bacon? Lol
New bacon video coming soon. This one just helps you choose the best tool for harvesting bacon.
Disculpa soy suscriptor como seyama la mira telescópica térmica k usas estoy en USA
Sadly missed out on the 1,2 boom & splatter on this vid
The base magnification of the thermion vs trail doesn’t seem to be much different . If anything the trail seems to have more magnification. Can you tell a difference ?
They both have the same sensor, objective lens, and field of view so on video the magnification should look the same. The only difference is that the Thermion eyepiece has more magnification, which is why it is listed as a 2X
Who are you????
N Vision Atlas 100 mm The Best
best review ever
Thermion XP50 is the way
How expensive are these?
Насколько корректно сравнение если на аксионах стоит увеличение и картинка "плывёт"
Interesting video.
I've been thinking about the n vision halo lr but after watching this I don't think so.
Make sure you watch the video in HD and I would also recommend taking a look at the other Halo videos on our channel.
@@Ultimatenightvision I have watched yours and other videos of the halo lr and it looked very good. I really don't like the lime green tint of the image but the core and warranty are a real + for me. In this video the background didn't look good. I'm saving my pennies for one.
He said, “oof”
hey ! what is that animal in 2:35 ? had no sub title .
Neanderthal 😄
完全不懂英文……不知道哪款经济实惠一点
n-vision atlas 100mm looks above of all ...
just needs a mount and video out to car display!!
N vision it is!! My mind is made up!
Wait... these aren’t even rifle scopes?!? Dangit!
The Halo, Trail and Thermion are rifle scopes
Ultimate Night Vision alas, the Alias 100mm looks like it’s the best. Maybe I don’t need the best; maybe a crummy NTB is enough. I just need to see coyotes at max 100m after all.
🙋
Love you🌹🌹🌹🌹💯💯💯💯💯
Are you comparing devices with price difference of more than 5000 USD? You get for what you pay, mate.
I wanted to include a couple of each - entry level, mid level, and high end, so people could compare not only similar optics, but also get an idea of the relative performance differences across various price ranges.
#first view super video
I agree boss people don't believe this video it's very misleading. The Halo beats anything pulsar by a large margin. It's not even relatively close
You must be looking at a different video, or dont know what "not even close" actually means. lol