Li-Fi, 100X Faster Than Wi-Fi! | ColdFusion

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
  • Li-Fi looks to be yet another disruptive technology, this time in communication, which has remained with the same wireless technology since the year 2000.
    A correction* I was supposed to say South Korea's world record STANDARD speed of 100mbps
    Subscribe here: goo.gl/9FS8uF
    Become a Patreon!: / coldfusion_tv
    Ted Talk: • Wireless data from eve...
    Other sources:
    en.wikipedia.o...
    www.smh.com.au/...
    purelifi.com/
    Hi, welcome to ColdFusion (formally known as ColdfusTion).
    Experience the cutting edge of the world around us in a fun relaxed atmosphere.
    //Soundtrack//
    Taquami - You R Everything
    Haring - Us
    Porter Robinson - Sea of Voices (RAC Mix)
    Idle Mind - Mine (feat. Paul Francis)
    Hot Toddy - Down to Love (Henry Krinkle's Lush Haus Mix)
    Burn Water - My Everything (Unreleased)
    » Google + | www.google.com/...
    » Facebook | / coldfusiontv
    » Patreon: / coldfusion_tv
    » My music | burnwater.bandc... or
    » / burnwater
    » / coldfusion_tv
    » Collection of music used in videos: • ColdFusion's 2 Hour Me...
    Producer: Dagogo Altraide
    Editing website: www.cfnstudios.com
    Coldfusion Android Launcher: play.google.co...
    » Twitter | @ColdFusion_TV

Komentáře • 6K

  • @Naval_Monkey
    @Naval_Monkey Před 7 lety +1075

    Me today: Shitty Wi-Fi, can only watch videos at 144p
    Future people: Shitty Li-Fi, can only watch videos at 4K at 60 FPS

    • @guibelson4809
      @guibelson4809 Před 7 lety

      LMAO

    • @sayonarax2004
      @sayonarax2004 Před 7 lety +3

      Stop whining child.

    • @anjopag31
      @anjopag31 Před 7 lety +16

      ^^ Salty.

    • @facelesstongue128
      @facelesstongue128 Před 7 lety +35

      I remember 56K dial ups and downloading a 5mb song took 20 min.
      Fuck we had no video but flash games

    • @abj9121
      @abj9121 Před 7 lety +6

      you must have had some good brand modem, us robotics or what? I had 14kbs modem and the ISP was giving like half kbs most times

  • @Surkee
    @Surkee Před 8 lety +1886

    Next: GR-Fi
    GR = Gamma Ray
    Maximum speed: ~500 Terrabytes per picosecond.
    Sure, the radiation would kill you almost instantly, and you'd need an insane amount of electrical current, but it would work! Amirite?

    • @FireAngel842
      @FireAngel842 Před 8 lety +171

      Rate 10/10 would gamma again -IGN

    • @AlxM96
      @AlxM96 Před 8 lety +128

      I bet if you started a kickstart on this you would be fully backed in a hour

    • @noel8604
      @noel8604 Před 8 lety +65

      +AmateurCZcamsr It can kill you? I thought it just turns you into the Hulk.

    • @shrikantjha9860
      @shrikantjha9860 Před 8 lety +1

      +Noel Tirado i hope tou are joking

    • @suannoir
      @suannoir Před 8 lety +7

      Truly hit my funny bone with this comment 😅

  • @ColdFusion
    @ColdFusion  Před 8 lety +438

    Li-Fi looks to be yet another disruptive technology, this time in communication. Just to clarify, Li-Fi will probably work alongside Wi-Fi and not replace it completely. Though with a download speed of 18 movies in one second, it's a lot faster!
    Enjoy the video.

    • @vaibhavgupta8385
      @vaibhavgupta8385 Před 8 lety +5

      You are again the best

    • @yudeancrab
      @yudeancrab Před 8 lety +1

      LiFi works with wifi?

    • @theanantshukla
      @theanantshukla Před 8 lety +5

      You are seriously epic mahn. Great job and continue doing this.! Loved the last Tata video too

    • @BRVvideos
      @BRVvideos Před 8 lety +4

      +ColdFusion Thank you for always making highly knowledgeable content

    • @DeeJay00001
      @DeeJay00001 Před 8 lety +4

      Great video but I'm not sure if I heard anything about security

  • @solobackpacking
    @solobackpacking Před 5 lety +277

    LiFi security?
    Curtains.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt Před 5 lety +12

      Or just stick someone's fat ass in there ... supposedly it doesn't travel well though flesh (more precisely through the water in the body). xD

    • @mishal321
      @mishal321 Před 4 lety +1

      @@BillAnt wot

    • @MegaGangsta4life
      @MegaGangsta4life Před 4 lety

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @circuit10
      @circuit10 Před 4 lety +1

      @@BillAnt That's 5G, this is light (light can't go through flesh either but it's not the water, light can go through water)

    • @Zeekiel
      @Zeekiel Před 4 lety

      Hahahhahahp

  • @andrewkeener5480
    @andrewkeener5480 Před 8 lety +50

    someone behind the curtain just hit pause when he put his hand under the light.

    • @mattmatt7381
      @mattmatt7381 Před 7 lety +6

      Andrew Keener Yeah if the wifi is so good shouldnt it have already been able to stream the whole thing even if "LiFi" Was disconnected? Like shouldnt it have preloaded the rest of the vid

  • @alexstromberg7696
    @alexstromberg7696 Před 8 lety +84

    Normal wi-fi is better. Why? Light doesn't go through walls.

    • @aaronstone360
      @aaronstone360 Před 8 lety +24

      your mind isnt capable of going through wall

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee Před 8 lety +21

      +alex strömberg So you only have one light in the whole house?

    • @alexstromberg7696
      @alexstromberg7696 Před 8 lety +7

      Shayan ⁢ No but maybe my head is in front of the light?

    • @aaronstone360
      @aaronstone360 Před 8 lety +8

      +alex strömberg there nothing in your head though

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee Před 8 lety +1

      alex strömberg You have only one light in your whole room?

  • @KalpeshPatel78
    @KalpeshPatel78 Před 8 lety +116

    Downloading a movie within seconds. Shadow falls on the device at 99.9%

    • @fett716
      @fett716 Před 8 lety

      lol

    • @WayneJohnsonZastil
      @WayneJohnsonZastil Před 8 lety +1

      One big shadow!

    • @misium
      @misium Před 8 lety +1

      you just said it takes seconds to download the movie, in worst case you just do it again

    • @KalpeshPatel78
      @KalpeshPatel78 Před 8 lety +1

      misium Its about how irritating downloads can be. :P

    • @jaystarr6571
      @jaystarr6571 Před 8 lety +5

      Just get a cybernetic eye. Then you could just beam the internet directly into your brain by staring at the light bulbs for a few hours.

  • @luckyuche
    @luckyuche Před rokem +5

    7 years later. What's happened with this idea?

  • @SandmanDeltaForce1
    @SandmanDeltaForce1 Před 8 lety +1246

    Say goodbye to good old days of watching porn in the dark XD

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya Před 8 lety +89

      did you watch the video? the light can be transmitted at a brightness not perceivable by human eyes.

    • @SandmanDeltaForce1
      @SandmanDeltaForce1 Před 8 lety +136

      Kaffi O I was just making a joke. I saw the whole video

    • @matthewsonguad3313
      @matthewsonguad3313 Před 8 lety +2

      just dim the lights

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee Před 8 lety +169

      +Kaffi O Lets have a moment of silence for people who dont understand jokes

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya Před 8 lety +3

      +Anshuman Jain =(

  • @kalebbruwer
    @kalebbruwer Před 7 lety +207

    So you want optic fibre without the cable. The cable is there for a reason: it's more stable.

    • @pythyyy5115
      @pythyyy5115 Před 7 lety +4

      Kaleb Bruwer why are you against this

    • @h00b00
      @h00b00 Před 7 lety +2

      But light bulbs are more abundant and accessible so with proper redundancy this can actually work really well esp. for rural areas.

    • @kalebbruwer
      @kalebbruwer Před 7 lety +11

      Bhoopati Baboo
      1: You lose connection whenever something passes between you and the lightbulb, Imagine playing games like that!
      2: This system is still going to be bottlenecked by the speed at witch your lightbulb communicates with the server, witch does not benefit from this technology and IS our present bottleneck already.
      3: Why is this better in candle-lit rural areas?

    • @Emma-kz3zr
      @Emma-kz3zr Před 7 lety +4

      Cody Nemo, in 1999 the UK considered 33k more than adequate, 4mb isn't anywhere near the requirement for multiple devices streaming 4k in house hold (e.g 3x TVS + 4x hand held), nevermind taking into account multiple devices 4k+ uploads requirements.

    • @A15Channel
      @A15Channel Před 7 lety +5

      What if they build a device that you could mount on your console or laptop that produces the light, like a stick on flashlight, problem solved.

  • @thallium200
    @thallium200 Před 8 lety +302

    This is all talking about downlink.
    What about uplink? The other half of the WiFi equation.

    • @m1aws
      @m1aws Před 8 lety +7

      Consider. What is your uplink internet speed, its slower. Why not use a different colour (IR?) Led for uplink.

    • @sMASHsound
      @sMASHsound Před 8 lety +5

      i have that same question. and then there is the line of sight issue. its just like sending internet via lasers.
      one potential option i have just thought of is to have multiple sensors around a room, and the mobile device will be able to emit light signal in any orientation, because in nearly every plane, a sensor would be able to capture the signal.
      and to further that, all street lamps could be converted to send/receive signals. so it wouldn't be a long distance interface, but more like a localized net, meant for high traffic zones. but, it is cheap. u just need a modified modem and led lamps for the transmission, and then receiver sensors for the reception. then connect to the net.
      the main advantage would be the speed, and that would only really be useful if 20 people want to live stream 4k at the same time in the same place.

    • @m1aws
      @m1aws Před 8 lety +1

      Ashmeed Mohammed Imagine if they were all on a mesh network...

    • @Rapbando
      @Rapbando Před 8 lety +1

      Only the visible light spectrum theoretical bandwidth today is around 100 ZB/s. That's all 2015 year world data traffic times 100, but in a second!!! If you leave 2 of the 7 visible colors reserved for uplink it's more than enough

    • @m1aws
      @m1aws Před 8 lety +1

      Rapbando the infrared band makes it 3x wider.

  • @bahaatamer1245
    @bahaatamer1245 Před 4 lety +35

    Mom: OFF TO STUDY!
    me: no mom
    Mom: *turns off my Light*

  • @kevineusebio
    @kevineusebio Před 8 lety +131

    Who needs a life when you got LiFi? 😂

  • @JumpzVidz
    @JumpzVidz Před 7 lety +142

    The future future people will be saying oh insecure lifi is and how we need to make to something 1000x faster... gamma rays

    • @danielg3857
      @danielg3857 Před 7 lety +31

      and their bodies will just be radiation protected robot exoskeletons, so they'll use it

    • @neonmonster9272
      @neonmonster9272 Před 7 lety +6

      That's how the apocalypse will start

    • @nicu8145
      @nicu8145 Před 7 lety +9

      _Jumpz_ how a bout the planet being transformed into a WiFi router ? 😀😀

    • @nicu8145
      @nicu8145 Před 7 lety

      _Jumpz_ how a bout the planet being transformed into a WiFi router ? 😀😀

    • @TastyTarco
      @TastyTarco Před 7 lety

      _Jumpz_ or Laser beams!!

  • @colinjackson9720
    @colinjackson9720 Před 7 lety +68

    This would be so impractical. The benefit of radio is that it passes through surfaces. ANYTHING opaque would stop visible light Internet...

    • @sigspearthumb3904
      @sigspearthumb3904 Před 7 lety +2

      However how many times do you find yourself in a dark room?... See?

    • @savagekando4677
      @savagekando4677 Před 7 lety +9

      There is also the problem of you'r device sending the data back , the internet is a 2 way street ! you will need light's and receptors everywhere in the room and a big light on you'r device to send the data back ! it's a stupid idea , and stupid people will take the fishbait and invest in this , so sad !

    • @risalalfiandi1008
      @risalalfiandi1008 Před 7 lety

      it's not stupid, and they will figure it out somehow (about the 2 way data)

    • @neerajdubey5334
      @neerajdubey5334 Před 7 lety

      yeah that's an advantage in wifi but, it also is a demerit for security reasons, as out of your room any one can access, and hack it and can steal your information,
      this, property of being blocked by an opaque surface serves as a merit in lifi when you are more concerned about privacy,
      on addition radio waves used for wifi are harmful which limits it's usability in radiation sensitive areas, like hospitals, aeroplanes, nuclear power plants. . .

    • @neerajdubey5334
      @neerajdubey5334 Před 7 lety

      Mark Polner , you can dim the light to negligible, if it's not at a far distance it's sensitive enough to handle your comfort.

  • @ajjukevicius4710
    @ajjukevicius4710 Před 3 lety +2

    biggest problem with this - communication must be bidirectional, that means light bulbs will have to have ability not only to emit light, but also to receive; handset devices will have to have to have not only an "eye" to receive the light, but also a bulb on itself (not necessarily visible light bulb, maybe IR or UV) and that bulb must be quite powerful in order for it's beams to bounce off walls and floors.

  • @deadpoolreborn5322
    @deadpoolreborn5322 Před 7 lety +45

    now I can send friend request to aliens.

    • @librosxelnhaks7273
      @librosxelnhaks7273 Před 4 lety

      It was sent by radio waves and they got but ignored it they found it very slow or outdated and they knew who were the senders, etc.

    • @fbifbi9528
      @fbifbi9528 Před 4 lety +1

      Delete you comment

  • @Sal3600
    @Sal3600 Před 8 lety +68

    South Korea's world record internet speeds are only 100Mbits/s? Come on, it has to be faster than that.

    • @ColdFusion
      @ColdFusion  Před 8 lety +34

      +Sal3600 Thanks for picking that up! I was supposed to say: "South Korea has a world record STANDARD internet speed of 100Mbp/s." I've added a correction note in the description.

    • @ViorelIanasi
      @ViorelIanasi Před 8 lety +11

      +Sal3600 I have 1Gbps in Romania :)

    • @invalidsudo
      @invalidsudo Před 8 lety

      +ColdFusion It would also be nice to make an annotation :)

    • @citigroup64
      @citigroup64 Před 8 lety

      +Viorel Ianasi is that over wifi? If so you must be from the future because no current router would be able to do that consistently if at all

    • @maitralala
      @maitralala Před 8 lety

      +Sal3600 look at something interesting about Europe : speeds up to 500 Mbps not just 100 as in Korea !!! www.romania-insider.com/broadband-internet-romania/147305/ or this one from an internet provider www.upc.ro/internet/abonamente/fiber-power-500/ .....

  • @ExpertGamingOnline
    @ExpertGamingOnline Před 8 lety +176

    Im watching this in the year 2169 we got su-fi now with download and upload speeds of 1terabyte a second.

    • @foulcamel5973
      @foulcamel5973 Před 8 lety +28

      We download genes now

    • @trollimusprime8521
      @trollimusprime8521 Před 8 lety +16

      I'm from the year 2369, and we don't have to worry about data transfer, all of reality is now a multiverse simulation run by algorithms built into the quantum structure of matter it's self. Everything just runs it's self.

    • @BlueBeefalo
      @BlueBeefalo Před 8 lety +3

      pssssh 1tbps is laughable. 90pbps is where it's at

    • @maskiez
      @maskiez Před 8 lety +14

      I live in 2469, and earth is no longer exist. i'm one of the lucky person who made their way to another planet 1 trillion light years away from earth. Sometime I go to the old Earth's moon for vacation and I am able to communicate with the new earth in real time.

    • @berliandro
      @berliandro Před 8 lety +9

      Guys... im 4735... we created thousands of planet, and we got Wo-Ho-Fi, the speed of *Worm Hole Fidelity* is 1 Yotabyte per 1 zepto second. and 1 thing i want to tell you... CRISPR really safe our species until now!

  • @reganisawesome123
    @reganisawesome123 Před 7 lety +37

    *Instantly installs GTA 5 at work*
    Me: hell yeah!
    *boss comes in*
    *uninstalls GTA 5*
    Boss: What are you doing?
    Me: nothing
    *boss leaves*
    *reinstalls GTA 5*

    • @omerjamalelden2012
      @omerjamalelden2012 Před 4 lety +2

      Installation has nothing to do with internet speed, download is.

    • @ohno3730
      @ohno3730 Před 4 lety +2

      @@omerjamalelden2012 ok geek

  • @SuperSaf
    @SuperSaf Před 8 lety +187

    Awesome video once again, very interesting

    • @ColdFusion
      @ColdFusion  Před 8 lety +13

      +SuperSaf TV Cheers mate!

    • @joshbriggsDayZBeast
      @joshbriggsDayZBeast Před 8 lety

      +SuperSaf TV HI SAF :3

    • @asheralegre1954
      @asheralegre1954 Před 8 lety

      I watched your z5 Sony vids

    • @sharyl01
      @sharyl01 Před 8 lety

      +asher alegre I've one

    • @makaisenki
      @makaisenki Před 8 lety +3

      +SuperSaf TV Why is it very interesting? All we got out of this was how to receive data. Not in any way shape or form how the device communicates back. How would we upload to the lightbulb? How would we have to reconfigure it?
      We are talking about optical fiber through the air... That's not terribly interesting if the communication is mostly 1 directional. I'm not drilling holes in the ceiling to wire these things up... even if I did the wires would limit throughput, etc...

  • @CallumJenner
    @CallumJenner Před 8 lety +17

    This is easily my favourite CZcams channel, you put so much effort into all of your videos :)

  • @BrianThomas
    @BrianThomas Před 8 lety +105

    It's fiber communication without the glass?!

    • @douglask2903
      @douglask2903 Před 8 lety +18

      Pretty much

    • @MiguelX413
      @MiguelX413 Před 8 lety +1

      +Brian Thomas even faster

    • @BrianThomas
      @BrianThomas Před 8 lety

      lbpfan950 Faster? How fast?

    • @MiguelX413
      @MiguelX413 Před 8 lety +1

      Brian Thomas
      ill use google fiber as an example, its goes 1 Gb/s, Li-Fi cann go about 10 Gb/s

    • @BrianThomas
      @BrianThomas Před 8 lety

      Comcast has Gigabit Pro they're offering 3Gbps actually. 2Gbps for the wired, and 1Gbps for wireless. It's a pretty cool offering, but IC what you mean 10Gbps is pretty fast. Fast enough to feed video to a small town.

  • @cstemshorn
    @cstemshorn Před 3 lety +10

    2021 still waiting for Li-Fi

  • @EricArts
    @EricArts Před 8 lety +57

    Ayy, I'm from Estonia. I didn't know they used this technology there :o

    • @kalev_9
      @kalev_9 Před 8 lety +6

      Same, kinda baffled that we haven't heard of it, usually they brag about every tehnological thing here

    • @adityaravishankar8344
      @adityaravishankar8344 Před 8 lety +10

      ***** Do you all get stoned?

    • @adityaravishankar8344
      @adityaravishankar8344 Před 8 lety +15

      ***** E'stonia'

    • @EricArts
      @EricArts Před 8 lety

      Aditya Ravishankar
      I can't say for everyone but most of the people that I know do :D

    • @DaFrekkinNoob
      @DaFrekkinNoob Před 8 lety +1

      +EricArts Vaatasin ka et ossa raisk eestis veits hull tehnoloogia. Kuigi me oleme jah peaaegu kõige tehnoloogilisem riik, või nii. :D

  • @youareaweaslecuntswamp3763
    @youareaweaslecuntswamp3763 Před 7 lety +79

    Well 2016 is ending, has the damn thing improved?

    • @ThePyroTempest
      @ThePyroTempest Před 7 lety +4

      www.sciencealert.com/a-new-type-of-li-fi-has-reportedly-cracked-40-gigabits-per-second-100-times-faster-than-regular-wi-fi
      Apparently, current progress has reached 40 Gbps.

    • @Skullord222
      @Skullord222 Před 7 lety +14

      2017, light still can't pass through walls, what a waste.

    • @thavrisco1632
      @thavrisco1632 Před 7 lety +5

      It will be at least 2022 before it's comercialized

    • @readmore3208
      @readmore3208 Před 7 lety

      Shimaqan
      simple glass walls

    • @katakisLives
      @katakisLives Před 7 lety +5

      I haven't heard much more regarding Lifi for ages! quite often this is how technological ideas die! you just suddenly realize it hasn't been spoken of for ages.

  • @rahulharikr
    @rahulharikr Před 8 lety +93

    You make good videos.... Now my favorites include ColdFusion and MKBHD.

    • @Tate525
      @Tate525 Před 8 lety +1

      Austin Evans, Jonathan Morrison, LinusTechTips and Detroit Borg check them out too great channels

    • @rkiwtir1146
      @rkiwtir1146 Před 8 lety

      +Sanath Chavan unbox Therapy?

    • @Tate525
      @Tate525 Před 8 lety

      Ritwik Sharma yup forgot to mention

    • @stuartkeating6508
      @stuartkeating6508 Před 8 lety +4

      Don't forget SoFloAntonio, PrankInvasion and Vitalyzdtv

    • @stuartkeating6508
      @stuartkeating6508 Před 8 lety +5

      Aristocles Plato Nah man, they are the most intellectual and professional pranksters out there....Of course I'm joking, I hate those fucking channels. Lol

  • @jonasforsberg8199
    @jonasforsberg8199 Před 7 lety +7

    I like that wifi goes through walls, kind of its main selling point is that it's not typically hindered by physical obstructions, meaning you have more freedom while still being connected.

  • @user-np7kr4wx7g
    @user-np7kr4wx7g Před 8 lety +89

    how would you upload something using Li fi though

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee Před 8 lety +5

      +t800 Just like you do on a WiFi, wheres the problem?

    • @user-np7kr4wx7g
      @user-np7kr4wx7g Před 8 lety +33

      Shayan ⁢ well if I've understood correctly Lifi transfers data through light, so would i need a light on lets say my phone to upload data

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee Před 8 lety +1

      t800 Hmm, true. Maybe thats why he said lifi wont completely replace wifi

    • @stroopwafelijzer
      @stroopwafelijzer Před 8 lety +2

      You'd need another light at the receiving end to send things back and a receiver somewhere that's also connected to the internet.

    • @CMDR_John_Crichton
      @CMDR_John_Crichton Před 8 lety +14

      +Fuzz944 Good idea, but I think the process of flickering a phone's screen at the rate described in the video would be murder on the battery.

  • @Money-talking
    @Money-talking Před 4 lety +179

    3 years later... This Li-Fi seems like a lie...

    • @oddnwmbers
      @oddnwmbers Před 4 lety +9

      *4

    • @ydziros
      @ydziros Před 4 lety +61

      Well... I wouldn't say it's a lie, it just seems really inconvenient. Wi-Fi IS good exactly because it goes through walls and in all directions. I can't really imagine any circumstance where Li-Fi is usable, except for lab conditions. For a stationary pc - if you can run a wire for Li-Fi to a nearest lamp, you can probably just run wired connection to that pc anyway. For a laptop or phone - any obstruction, or angle change has non-illusory chance to mess up connection.
      So, it's not "a lie", it's just... Why?

    • @yunus6009
      @yunus6009 Před 4 lety

      Haha right

    • @lediozefi5784
      @lediozefi5784 Před 4 lety +7

      Lie-fi

    • @rob-123
      @rob-123 Před 4 lety +1

      @@ydziros try using wifi in a enterprise environment and it is rubbish. I hope Wifi 6 is better but i dont think that will provide a good service with the ever increasing data demands of systems.

  • @weirdshamanwizzard3156
    @weirdshamanwizzard3156 Před 8 lety +89

    This would suck because you couldn't be online in the dark

    • @lilimccoy6194
      @lilimccoy6194 Před 8 lety +3

      ir leds

    • @taylormaddox5198
      @taylormaddox5198 Před 8 lety +31

      they said you would use a light that is dark enough that you wouldn't be able to see it but your device would still work with it

    • @Runslik3Wind
      @Runslik3Wind Před 7 lety

      Ikr i dont want a light show in my house.

    • @ayumuchan3541
      @ayumuchan3541 Před 7 lety

      Just focus the light on your device only, the device still emits light so you're never in complete dark anyways.

    • @enigma9306
      @enigma9306 Před 7 lety +1

      As he said, you can have a light on and not see it on

  • @1772axaypatel
    @1772axaypatel Před 7 lety +4

    Speed doesn't only depend on your Wifi, Gr-Fi or any other Lifi thing, It depends on your TCP/IP link speed too. Right now, Wifi with 802.11ac feature we can get max 1Gbps, and In future (means 1-2 years only) It will rise to more speed (ideally 10Gbps) and So, WiFi is very much mature and progressive thing. Nobody easily can replace it.

  • @imhazard0uz
    @imhazard0uz Před 7 lety +170

    Use the sun for Li-fi, internet for all.

    • @pythyyy5115
      @pythyyy5115 Před 7 lety +42

      don't let the aliens steal our internet

    • @theuncanspan
      @theuncanspan Před 7 lety +28

      internet in day time only

    • @OmegaF77
      @OmegaF77 Před 7 lety +38

      It takes light from the sun 8 minutes to get to Earth. It would be more like massive lag for all.

    • @j777111able
      @j777111able Před 7 lety

      Reuben U 😂

    • @zaviusfirerave
      @zaviusfirerave Před 7 lety +2

      No internet inside your house, then.

  • @Bacon-ol3yr
    @Bacon-ol3yr Před 8 lety +59

    Higher frequency= less range
    Light can't penetrate opaque objects

    • @7kortos7
      @7kortos7 Před 8 lety

      i would just get a small light, make a shade for it around the receiver and just leave it on.

    • @patriciomk939
      @patriciomk939 Před 7 lety

      unless u have light everywhere

    • @patriciomk939
      @patriciomk939 Před 7 lety +7

      they said u could dim the light so the human eye wouldnt notice

    • @angelioto007
      @angelioto007 Před 7 lety +11

      I still wonder how do you upload thing to the internet though...

    • @Bacon-ol3yr
      @Bacon-ol3yr Před 7 lety

      Kyro Lights? Yes. A Li-Fi transmitter? Probably not.

  • @AmitKriplani87
    @AmitKriplani87 Před 8 lety +13

    "hey move away, you are blocking my youtube"!!

  • @melvin4681
    @melvin4681 Před 5 lety +136

    100x faster than wi-fi. That alone makes it a great idea.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt Před 5 lety +19

      Right, but someone's fat ass blocking the signal makes it a bad idea.

    • @martinhltr
      @martinhltr Před 4 lety +1

      is only 2x faster😂

    • @atlien1988
      @atlien1988 Před 4 lety

      It's not 100x faster...not yet anyway.

    • @luhiko5923
      @luhiko5923 Před 4 lety +1

      No this video sucks. Wifi can go to 1000mbps+. Lifi is 100mbps. Eew

    • @omair.raza1
      @omair.raza1 Před 4 lety +1

      @@luhiko5923 only nasa has that fast wifi

  • @TheMuseap
    @TheMuseap Před 8 lety +57

    The question is would it be able to go through walls?

    • @xXxDamageProxXx
      @xXxDamageProxXx Před 8 lety +13

      +Travis Younker NO.

    • @pfidze
      @pfidze Před 8 lety

      +xXxDamageProxXx m8 calm down you dont need to tell off every single person, this guy is just trying to have a laugh

    • @xXxDamageProxXx
      @xXxDamageProxXx Před 8 lety +1

      +Tinman Pizza well if people watched the entire video, I'll be fine.

    • @pfidze
      @pfidze Před 8 lety +1

      +xXxDamageProxXx just pick your fights carefully m8 your lucky im not a jerk and went berserk at you.

    • @xXxDamageProxXx
      @xXxDamageProxXx Před 8 lety +3

      +Tinman Pizza even if you did, I would have ignored you.

  • @mackysobrevega1780
    @mackysobrevega1780 Před 8 lety +68

    Watching in 144p on dial up!

    • @rateater420
      @rateater420 Před 8 lety +12

      Dial up has been confirmed to be 10000X more powerful than LiFi the government just doesnt want you too be able to use it's true power

    • @rateater420
      @rateater420 Před 8 lety +1

      Dial up has been confirmed to be 10000X more powerful than LiFi the government just doesnt want you too be able to use it's true power

    • @JoyfullJuneBugg
      @JoyfullJuneBugg Před 8 lety +1

      Thank You AT&T

    • @ManishKumarIITG
      @ManishKumarIITG Před 8 lety

      +Jett Aniceto Stuff they don't want you to know kind of stuff.

    • @karanbirsinghbhullar
      @karanbirsinghbhullar Před 8 lety

      what is the speed you are getting and where,if i might ask

  • @TinRapper
    @TinRapper Před 8 lety +150

    What a time to be alive!

    • @MatthewColbourn
      @MatthewColbourn Před 8 lety +3

      +Max Đỗ I agree Totaly!

    • @JoeARedHawk275
      @JoeARedHawk275 Před 8 lety

      It still has many flaws though. But I agree!

    • @TheEpicbuttercraft
      @TheEpicbuttercraft Před 8 lety +1

      By Drake and Future

    • @brandonwiebe2647
      @brandonwiebe2647 Před 8 lety

      +Joe A. Yeah but so did every other invention when it was first made

    • @TinRapper
      @TinRapper Před 8 lety +6

      ***** Sorry for what's going on mate. I hope you and your love ones are doing ok.

  • @JasonMcNamara
    @JasonMcNamara Před 4 lety +3

    Since discovering ColdFusion TV about a week ago I have watched soooo many of Adgogo’s incredible videos that I actually noticed a reused clip at 6:14 when a Vince Vaughn looking dude is walking down the street. That’s not a critique, it’s actually respect. I make videos too and I have to applaud ColdFusion TV for the incredible research and countless hour put into both gathering the footage, editing the videos and making us all so much more educated... FOR FREE!!! Every subscriber & viewer here is smarter because of this channel. Thank you.

  • @jacobwaltz4941
    @jacobwaltz4941 Před 8 lety +168

    replace the sun with them

    • @BrunoIniesta
      @BrunoIniesta Před 8 lety +20

      Internet with 480000ms of ping

    • @majkcan
      @majkcan Před 8 lety +2

      Are you talking about Internet Explorer? ;)

    • @jacobwaltz4941
      @jacobwaltz4941 Před 8 lety +2

      majkcan i see what you did there

    • @Beezmantv
      @Beezmantv Před 8 lety

      +MRwooshhh cause its too slow! u won't be able 2 stream shit!!

    • @greyjohnson4124
      @greyjohnson4124 Před 8 lety

      Why is it Slower it's still light

  • @AakashKalaria
    @AakashKalaria Před 8 lety +17

    If WiFi came after LiFi, WiFi would be dubbed revolutionary. It's invisible, you can work in dark or in bright light. It can pass through objects and bounce off walls, no direct line of sight required. Uses much less energy, any device can be made into hotspot... and more.

  • @spdzodzo
    @spdzodzo Před 7 lety +417

    how about if i want to watch porn in a dark room? would this work?

    • @pdarddy112
      @pdarddy112 Před 7 lety +41

      spdzodzo you'd have to download it. In a millisecond.

    • @sigspearthumb3904
      @sigspearthumb3904 Před 7 lety +67

      Then you'd rethink your life quit watching that trash, and treat a girl the right way then live life happily ever after. Thanking LiFi for a life changing experience. :)

    • @thaihoangcfc
      @thaihoangcfc Před 7 lety +16

      +立黄 pffffttt 😂😂😂

    • @ajddavid452
      @ajddavid452 Před 7 lety +21

      well the light wouldn't technically be off, it's just so dim that the human eye can't detect light but technology can still detect light, but wasting several years of your life watching porn is a stupid decision

    • @bookle5829
      @bookle5829 Před 7 lety +1

      Not watching the whole video, huh?

  • @cherryscarlett
    @cherryscarlett Před 3 lety +2

    3:26 _basically, it just codes light signals.. it turns them into complex language that programs a visual signal the projector uses_

  • @corthew
    @corthew Před 8 lety +29

    He puts his hand between the receiver and the light source and the signal is blocked.
    That's not a success.
    Now, were he to put his hand between them and have the receiver still be able to detect the pulses from ambient light I may consider that a success.
    Basically, you have to have the optics of the receiver in direct LOS to the source for this to work.
    That's not a step up from Wi-Fi.

    • @berliandro
      @berliandro Před 8 lety

      light is spreading and can go through man's hand or finger. So even he blocks the detector, the light still can be absorbed by the detector

    • @corthew
      @corthew Před 8 lety +1

      Rainbow Pepe And yet it was not the case in this video

    • @tmartn4prison651
      @tmartn4prison651 Před 8 lety

      Because li-fi was only coming from that light only he even said it. if he had it on all the lights in the room then there wouldn't be a problem.

    • @Mancub2b
      @Mancub2b Před 7 lety +1

      corthew u could use it for downloads and uploads tho

    • @djpansetas6861
      @djpansetas6861 Před 7 lety +1

      iam a bit late but i thing the receiver is build inside the lamp so nothing can blocked it.The creator at the event just demonstrated the way it works.

  • @theworldeatswithyou
    @theworldeatswithyou Před 8 lety +22

    You know what's even more convenient? Regular Wifi.

    • @stuartkeating6508
      @stuartkeating6508 Před 8 lety +1

      KNOWLEDGE!!!

    • @MikeTrieu
      @MikeTrieu Před 8 lety

      +Sintech- - Tell me again, how many light bulbs do you have in your house? Do you really think LoS is really a problem when all the technology is is a flickering LED array?

    • @David-un4cs
      @David-un4cs Před 8 lety

      +Sintech- - Put them in the ceiling! It's even easier if you live in a small apartment for the landlords to put this in every room.

    • @ariochiv
      @ariochiv Před 8 lety +2

      +Mike Trieu (MegasChara) Where are these light bulbs all over your house getting their signal from? What is the point of using Li-Fi if you have to wire your entire house with a high-speed network to feed the light bulbs in every room? And how do the receiving devices send signals back the light bulbs?

    • @MikeTrieu
      @MikeTrieu Před 8 lety

      Arioch IV​​ Who said anything about another high-speed network? All you need to exchange is timing information on a periodic basis for TDMA signaling. You could achieve that with simple IEEE 802.15.4 (a.k.a. IoT) radios. As for transmitting from receiving devices, especially on mobile handsets, I'd imagine one could modulate the LED backlight on LCD-based displays or directly on AMOLED-based ones. If that turns out to be insufficient (not enough intensity), OEMs could integrate a dedicated Li-Fi LED array somewhere near the top of the device like some phones already do for IR blasters. It also doesn't have to be visible light, just invisible IR so as not to be totally annoying to nearby users.

  • @Skyefaux
    @Skyefaux Před 8 lety +110

    what what if there's a wall? or you cause a shadow? lol

    • @ll931217
      @ll931217 Před 8 lety +25

      Or a moth blocking the light

    • @gringojr1900
      @gringojr1900 Před 8 lety +8

      you have a light in each room

    • @Skyefaux
      @Skyefaux Před 8 lety +1

      I'm sure it could be figured out.

    • @OHHnoYOUdidntMAN
      @OHHnoYOUdidntMAN Před 7 lety +1

      You can have a router with a light in your closet with your photo-light detector hooked up to your (ultra) high-speed router and connect from your device to said router :)

    • @RtrTchRiews-jc1eq
      @RtrTchRiews-jc1eq Před 7 lety +3

      Then why not use a cable?

  • @moviescores9315
    @moviescores9315 Před 4 lety +85

    its 2019
    it Li-ED

    • @goodchap4537
      @goodchap4537 Před 4 lety +1

      Hello, person from 2020, organisations are looking into li-fi as it's much more secure than wifi as it cannot get through walls also the speeds at which data can be transferred is alot better

    • @omair.raza1
      @omair.raza1 Před 4 lety

      @@goodchap4537 people can use fibre waves sensors to collect the data from lifi so its not that safe

    • @justin3594
      @justin3594 Před 3 lety

      Haha. I see what you did there.

    • @silentstorm5439
      @silentstorm5439 Před 3 lety

      @@goodchap4537 I'm a person from 2021 and I'm doing a research project for Boeing on Lifi so yes it is more secure and it just takes a long time to get a new system like this in place, people expect change to happen over night but innovation takes a lot of time to really take place

  • @iTzGlitcherr
    @iTzGlitcherr Před 8 lety +41

    This is amazing! So interesting, please keep making videos

    • @Oscar_Armstrong
      @Oscar_Armstrong Před 8 lety +1

      +iTzGlitcherr hay glitcher i like your vids but you should do some bo3 and bo2

    • @iTzGlitcherr
      @iTzGlitcherr Před 8 lety

      Thanks bud, I hopefully will soon just been busy

    • @Oscar_Armstrong
      @Oscar_Armstrong Před 8 lety

      ***** awesome your cool, what console do you play on? Just to make sure.

    • @iTzGlitcherr
      @iTzGlitcherr Před 8 lety

      +Oscar Armstrong mostly on Xbox one, but occasionally ps4 and pc

    • @Oscar_Armstrong
      @Oscar_Armstrong Před 8 lety +1

      ***** cool if you wouldn't might it might be cool to play with you one day (when i get my ps4). Good luck with the vids ;D

  • @Shawnmyrelle
    @Shawnmyrelle Před 7 lety +6

    I just looked at a bunch of Amazon reviews. This is still in it's early stages. Some of the reviews were hard to understand (especially if you're not a tech person), but what I gathered was that people's bulbs were going out, this required some kind of subscription for "additional features" and they're far more expensive than one would expect- considering the aim is to change the world. Li-Fi is a cool concept, but i'll wait a bit longer...

  • @manjake
    @manjake Před 8 lety +12

    Instances where Lie-Fi simply won't work:
    Phone in your pocket.
    Any device that doesn't have a special LED specifically made for Li-Fi (internet is a two-way communication). (not to mention enormous battery consumption)
    Any time that your device doesn't have direct line of sight to the light source (which is most of the time).
    You could be watching your video/playing your online game/downloading, and then someone walks in front of your computer, and suddenly you're disconnected from the internet. This technology would be so temperamental that it's simply not worth it.

    • @manjake
      @manjake Před 8 lety +6

      "Dude move, you're blocking my internet"

    • @gavincaesar3999
      @gavincaesar3999 Před 8 lety +2

      wifi and lifi combination.

    • @AnthonyJohnson-plus
      @AnthonyJohnson-plus Před 8 lety

      What about turning the lights off at night? wouldn't have internet then either! or sitting on your doorstep

    • @manjake
      @manjake Před 8 lety

      There are all _kinds_ problems with this.....

    • @TheDurk
      @TheDurk Před 8 lety +2

      You have some valid points, however LED's are highly energy efficient and wouldn't be that large of a drain on battery life.

  • @MrErick1160
    @MrErick1160 Před 6 lety +1

    ColdFusion, I was on your channel when you had 50k followers. It's crazy how far you went! you are an inspiration!

  • @Axelsypkenssmit
    @Axelsypkenssmit Před 8 lety +23

    I heard something about a chip that will manage batteries in such a way that you could charge your phone in 10 minutes in Netlinked daily yesterday (I think). Multiple phone manufactures and Tesla have shown interest. What do you know about this and are you doing a video on it?

    • @stroopwafelijzer
      @stroopwafelijzer Před 8 lety +5

      +Axel sypkens smit Look up Storedot, they're developing a battery that can charge in 60 seconds. Really cool stuff that could boost the electric car market

    • @rashad5010
      @rashad5010 Před 8 lety

      +Axel sypkens smit Graphene batteries?

    • @Tremor244
      @Tremor244 Před 8 lety +2

      +Axel sypkens smit That must be the graphene thing isn't it?

    • @rappertvass8695
      @rappertvass8695 Před 8 lety +1

      +Axel sypkens smit Graphene batteries if i'm correct?

  • @VincentOak
    @VincentOak Před 8 lety +44

    Put your phone into the pocket and the connection is dead

    • @Peter-lt3ey
      @Peter-lt3ey Před 8 lety

      my point exactly

    • @whateveryh2119
      @whateveryh2119 Před 8 lety +3

      Maybe it just me, but don't people typically use the internet OUTSIDE of their pockets?
      Okay, nvm. I think you have a point, you wouldn't be able to take skype calls, listen to music with your phone in your pocket etc.

    • @VincentOak
      @VincentOak Před 8 lety

      Alicia Kankainen neither would you receive any email or other messages while your phone is in your pocket

    • @whateveryh2119
      @whateveryh2119 Před 8 lety

      +Vincent Oak Yeah, though I don't think that will be as big of a deal. If the internet speed is so extremely fast you would receive the message basically as soon as you pick your phone up.
      You wouldn't be able to get a *ping* sound though, which will kind of suck. Perhaps they'll come up with some solution for this pocket problem.

    • @VincentOak
      @VincentOak Před 8 lety

      Alicia Kankainen this is a really impractical way of doing things
      There are more practical solutions that will drive this one into the great pit of forgotten lame ideas

  • @austin1839
    @austin1839 Před 8 lety +32

    This is a great step forward in technology, but the world is still going to self destruct.

    • @connerdurocher192
      @connerdurocher192 Před 8 lety +2

      Bet

    • @EH-ym6ep
      @EH-ym6ep Před 8 lety +17

      at least we can stream footage of the destruction with our lifi

    • @metaspherz
      @metaspherz Před 8 lety

      How did you arrive at that conclusion? The world/Earth can't possibly self-destruct. That's nonsense. Human civilization might eventually come to an end but the world will still be here until the sun goes nova or a much larger celestial object collides with it. But worlds just don't spontaneously self-destruct.

    • @tmartn4prison651
      @tmartn4prison651 Před 8 lety +1

      I can see you take everything serious

    • @zudy9067
      @zudy9067 Před 7 lety +1

      metaspherz Well what about we change "self destruct" to "evaporate"?
      or "faded"?
      black hole wont last forever.

  • @FooForce7
    @FooForce7 Před 6 lety +23

    Q: What do you call Wi-fi that fibs?
    A: Li-fi!

    • @theswiftdodo5870
      @theswiftdodo5870 Před 4 lety +1

      ahaha omg one year and im the only one who finds this hillarious XD nice one lol

  • @davidking8719
    @davidking8719 Před 8 lety +5

    From my experience on video streaming;when data is exchanged via a video format (depending on the size of the video and speed of the data connection) some part of the video is loaded already,usually more than 2 minutes. What does this mean? So,covering a light bulb and stopping the sensor from calculating the flicking binary lights tingy shouldn't stop the video from playing. To me,that was just a remote control programmed with a simple if statement. If (flicking light is detected) {play video;} else {pause;}. I am not saying LIFI doesn't exist. All i'm pointing out is,that video presentation is not convincing enough to deserve the hand clap it got.

    • @beverlywhitman303
      @beverlywhitman303 Před 8 lety +1

      +David King what your refuring to is call the video buffer, and i was thinking the same thing, then i thougth maybe they just turned the buffer off. But if so he should have stated that: "this is a streeming video with no buffer" otherwize it looks a lot more like what you've discribed

  • @damienharrison1
    @damienharrison1 Před 8 lety +33

    But how do you upload using this? Using normal wi-fi?
    EDIT: Thinking about it again, I don't think a phone will be able to upload using li-fi, and it's the data you send (searches, passwords, naked selfies, bank details etc.) that needs to be protected more than downloads. So I just can't see how this can be more secure than wi-fi.

    • @racso5628
      @racso5628 Před 8 lety

      I'm thinking that there would just need to be a receiver and your phone would have an LED display (so amoled and such). The phone would need the ability to pulse incredibly quickly which would be done using MEMS (unless current technology can already switch fast enough).

    • @Archivecollections
      @Archivecollections Před 8 lety +1

      +Oscar Conroy (Racso562) yeah, but smartphones are in our pockets? I think no light will be transferred in to our pockets? So how are they gonna solve that problem?

    • @racso5628
      @racso5628 Před 8 lety

      +HDPhotography Ah! I see what you mean now. That's a good point. I think this tech would add to WiFi, but not replace it. WiFi would still be the best option for uploading from our pockets.

    • @Archivecollections
      @Archivecollections Před 8 lety

      +Oscar Conroy (Racso562) that's the same thought I had about Li-fi, it's just gonna be a great add-on for the WiFi maybe like desktops that are constantly in the same position or something similar

    • @damienharrison1
      @damienharrison1 Před 8 lety +1

      ***** I said "more secure"... meaning: how can it be more secure than wi-fi.

  • @S7r1k3r581
    @S7r1k3r581 Před 8 lety +33

    but what about shadows?

    • @applepie55555
      @applepie55555 Před 8 lety

      Watch 3:50

    • @JaceW22
      @JaceW22 Před 8 lety +2

      +Clemens Steinbauer It's an advantage and disadvantage.
      People living next door or standing outside won't be able use your li-fi. But you just have to make sure you don't block the signal, which shouldn't be a problem if your transmitter is on the ceiling.
      Either way, if you block the li-fi signal , then I'm sure that a shadow won't mean total signal loss. Light bounces off walls and objects into where the shadow is. That's why a shadow isn't completely black. There is still some light getting to the shadow, just at a lower intensity. The signal should still get there then but your internet speed may just decrease a bit.

    • @dausdk
      @dausdk Před 8 lety +2

      +Jyson AW the problem i can see from this thing is, you cant use the internet. only for data transfer , try think , bulb give light to your phone(with light receptor) . but then, how the phone want to interact with the bulb? for example you want to open youtube, you must send request for youtube website, and if no request can be done, how the phone want to open youtube website? unless the bulb have light receptor too, and receive the light that phone created. the logic solve problem for me is , to combine Wi-fi and Li-fi . wifi for request, lifi for receiving data. what do you think?

    • @dausdk
      @dausdk Před 8 lety

      M. de k.
      if you want to open youtube website, you must request for it , so you need to upload the request to the server to be processed, then you will be downloading the data that been sended by the server . You understand how (download and upload kb/second) concept right? as you can see, the bulb cant receive your uploaded data since there is other way to do it.

    • @dausdk
      @dausdk Před 8 lety

      ok you dont understand what im trying to say. okay , if i dont put my phone in my pocket, and the phone is under LiFi bulb, still i can do the uploading data process?

  • @shinjisan2015
    @shinjisan2015 Před 6 lety +4

    All electromagnetic waves (radio, light etc) move at the same speed in air... the speed of light. The difference is the frequency of the wave, that is how many peaks and troughs in a second. Each peak and trough can be used to signal on/off or digital states depending on the translators. On/off is binary, the basis of electronic communication, and a single "bit". So, the higher the frequency, the more bits per second can be transmitted. The issue isn't the transfer medium, it's the translators on either end. Mainstream WiFi uses 2.4GHz and 5GHz signals... which have the theoretical maximum throughput of 2.4 Gigabits per second and 5 Gigabits per second. Yes, LiFi can reach HUNDREDS of Gigabits per second in testing, but the translators on either end are still the bottleneck.
    Think of it as your water supply to your house. The very large mains water pipeline running through the neighbourhood does gigalitres of water per hour. But, your tap can only do tens of litres per hour.

  • @blackbirdnoodle9546
    @blackbirdnoodle9546 Před 7 lety +36

    So if all of us use this Lifi...
    The earth will be the brightest planet...

  • @kastertalkie4093
    @kastertalkie4093 Před 8 lety +13

    so, you mean I can use 10 GB data with an led bulb but my phone must be underneath it. right?

    • @kevshorty
      @kevshorty Před 8 lety +2

      wouldn't be hard in a city where there are lights everywhere. My guess is even street lamps that light up cities, towns and highways would have Lifi technology built into it

    • @savagekando4677
      @savagekando4677 Před 7 lety +2

      It doesn't work you can receive data but can't transmit.So you will need a big light on you'r phone to send data back and a receptor everywhere in the room to recive you'r data back , and in the light of a day this Li-Fi doesn't work !

    • @wlog2610
      @wlog2610 Před 7 lety

      U wouldn't be able to see the light.

  • @TuhinBagh
    @TuhinBagh Před 8 lety +60

    Meanwhile average Joe in India is getting 512kbps :/
    *sighs*

    • @ManavGharat
      @ManavGharat Před 8 lety

      LMAO

    • @adityaravishankar8344
      @adityaravishankar8344 Před 8 lety +1

      ***** I get 64mbps
      Act

    • @TuhinBagh
      @TuhinBagh Před 8 lety +5

      Aditya Ravishankar "Average" Indians..
      not all are well fortuned nor their local ISP has the infrastructure to run fibernet.
      Dam! 64mbps though :/ Lucky bastard!

    • @JackalGYT
      @JackalGYT Před 8 lety

      +Tuhin Bagh I get 150 Mbps

    • @rateater420
      @rateater420 Před 8 lety +4

      I get 260 kbps

  • @blurrxyfaceex6126
    @blurrxyfaceex6126 Před 5 lety +16

    Tesla said “Everything is the Light”.

  • @AMalas
    @AMalas Před 8 lety +52

    WOW! NOW I CAN PLACE 3937101 SPECIAL LIGHTS FOR INTERNET! AND IF MY SHADOW BLOCKS THE SENSOR I WONT GET ANY RECEPTION!! I ALSO CAN ONLY RECEIVE BIT NEVER SEND!!! BUT AS LONG AS IT DELIVERS WHAT EVER THAT NUMBER WAS IM IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Said no one ever... just use optical fiber in the office for high speeds Aaaaand you're sorted!

    • @brandonwiebe2647
      @brandonwiebe2647 Před 8 lety +1

      You don't use "special lights" and you only need like 1 light per room looool

    • @chikeezebilo6545
      @chikeezebilo6545 Před 8 lety +1

      Looool. About the sending bits part... I never even considered that.. The lights need to be special if you want to send bits.

    • @32Rats
      @32Rats Před 8 lety

      that'd why in cold fusions comment he said they would work together more likely then not

    • @zakiNBG
      @zakiNBG Před 8 lety

      +Anas Malas you could also just have more than one light per room to make sure you dont block off your connection with your hand or anything else.

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 Před 8 lety

      It has advantages but yes wifi will still be a thing for being more accessible.

  • @abrvalg321
    @abrvalg321 Před 7 lety +18

    Have you ever heard about optic cables?

    • @kalebbruwer
      @kalebbruwer Před 7 lety +5

      Yes, but you're gonna lose connection to the server every time there is something between your device and the lightbulb.
      Any gamer can be driven to rage quitting if their game freezes every few minutes.

    • @selareid
      @selareid Před 7 lety

      Kaleb Bruwer if you put a while room with these lights the light will get to the receiver if you don't place anything on top of the receiver

    • @abrvalg321
      @abrvalg321 Před 7 lety +1

      This tech works in a very specific and rare environment. It has all the disadvantages of optic cable and wifi + can't do anything withh walls or coners.

    • @kalebbruwer
      @kalebbruwer Před 7 lety +3

      This tech is too sensitive. The reason we use radio signals is because it is a more robust system.

    • @Manuel-cz7mz
      @Manuel-cz7mz Před 7 lety +4

      Константин Войнов "Mum, go away! You stand between me and the Lifirouter!

  • @SkyhanViper
    @SkyhanViper Před 8 lety +45

    if your phone is in your pocket, then it will not see the led light and its disconnected

    • @rockshankar
      @rockshankar Před 8 lety

      put a tv remote in pocket and press it, it works..

    • @SkyhanViper
      @SkyhanViper Před 8 lety

      tv remote emits infared light, Li-Fi visible light

    • @rockshankar
      @rockshankar Před 8 lety +3

      li-fi is not visible light alone, its just light..

    • @SkyhanViper
      @SkyhanViper Před 8 lety +1

      Asher Gavin Cole
      ok

    • @kucentacent2510
      @kucentacent2510 Před 8 lety

      You don't get disconnected even you put you smartphone in your pocket. Because light is able to get through it. Am I right?

  • @rumatadestora
    @rumatadestora Před 4 lety +10

    Writing back from 2020. Li-fi ain't still here. When?)))

    • @BBBBBB-rd8gg
      @BBBBBB-rd8gg Před 3 lety +1

      Some evil forces are holding it back no doubt. Cause Wi-fi is dangerous to living things and they want to keep it around as long as they can. Wi-fi can be weaponized and used for population control.

    • @Alimhabidi
      @Alimhabidi Před 3 lety +3

      @@BBBBBB-rd8gg load of BS you dumbphuck 🤣🤣🤣

  • @LilSeven
    @LilSeven Před 7 lety +20

    so instead of a W, we get an L... 🤔🤔🤔

  • @Burzcasts
    @Burzcasts Před 8 lety +28

    Doesn't go through walls. Needs clear line of sight.. Not too useful.

    • @swedneck
      @swedneck Před 8 lety +13

      +Legend Length if they're gonna use visible light it's not going to pass through walls, that's why walls are opaque.

    • @TheFPSFanatic
      @TheFPSFanatic Před 8 lety +7

      +Burzin Billimoria Though I can't think of a room that doesn't have a lightbulb....

    • @senyorendan
      @senyorendan Před 8 lety +1

      how many lamps in your house?

    • @maksuree
      @maksuree Před 8 lety +2

      +Skyler_ Hunt
      it's not that simple for the love of god. you'll lose connection just from casting a shadow on your computer.

    • @EvilTwin123
      @EvilTwin123 Před 8 lety

      How many power outlets?
      Why do we need qi wireless charging?
      Cat5 outlets, hardwire directly?
      Dewey decimal system.
      Why do we need the internet at all?
      Libraries, red box blockbuster.
      Why do we need Netflix?
      America's funniest home videos.
      Why do we need you tube?

  • @summushieremiasclarkson4700

    So many fucking issues with this. UHF penetration, attenuation, reliability, interference to name a few. There's a reason IF is confined to straight line beam systems.

    • @markolukic8517
      @markolukic8517 Před 7 lety +8

      UltimateXtreme u can say same thing for radio waves but we still use them , if your eyes could see radio waves you would see a soup of random bullshit

    • @koukouvania
      @koukouvania Před 6 lety

      UltimateXtreme what's IF please?

    • @mirek190
      @mirek190 Před 6 lety

      marko lukić light has externally shot wave in nanometers ... ( Normal wifi had around 20 cm wave ) don't know how I will be works in movement ....

  • @martinhirsch94
    @martinhirsch94 Před 7 lety +2

    LIFI would only provide a data stream in one direction (download), so you still need an upload path. A WIFI or WIMAX or LTE uplink could provide for that. Still an improvement overall... fiber > LIFI in, WIFI/WIMAX > whatever out.

  • @misium
    @misium Před 8 lety +6

    what about privacy he mentioned at the beginning?
    light can be eavesdropped on through windows using telescopes, and you can shine a laser from far out into the receiver

    • @MrBeiragua
      @MrBeiragua Před 8 lety +1

      light can't pass through walls, and the signal of the lifi would be confined to only one room.

    • @wildnlean5775
      @wildnlean5775 Před 8 lety

      +Mosco Monster so when you go from room to room.....then what!?

    • @MrBeiragua
      @MrBeiragua Před 8 lety +1

      Wild N Lean You would probably need another light transmitting the same signal in the other rooms, and probably more than one light transmitting the internet signal in the same room for reinforcement, but don't quote me on that, I am just speculating solutions here.

    • @Camelotsmoon
      @Camelotsmoon Před 8 lety

      with wifi you can literally be standing next to a building and pick up on the signal, with what I'm hearing about lifi you'd have to put in more effort at least.

    • @Camelotsmoon
      @Camelotsmoon Před 8 lety +1

      ***** The best encryption you can have is cutting the network off from even being accessed in the first place :P.

  • @ethant9849
    @ethant9849 Před 7 lety +54

    do i need my lights on to use li fi ??? then how am i ment to watch pron in the night ???

    • @LuvBeautifulMusics
      @LuvBeautifulMusics Před 7 lety +7

      Underrated. Sir, your comment is under-rated.

    • @sebasfavaron
      @sebasfavaron Před 7 lety +3

      ethan twydle light can be dimmed to a point where you cannot see it and still works fine

    • @tinyhotopicbitch
      @tinyhotopicbitch Před 7 lety +2

      +S F So he can watch his pron in the dark.

    • @RodyTheRoad
      @RodyTheRoad Před 7 lety

      ethan twydle pron what?

    • @trip633
      @trip633 Před 7 lety

      I couldn't tell if you're joking or you're just a kid.

  • @AverageLaur
    @AverageLaur Před 7 lety +75

    oh lol im the 40%> enhternet users

    • @gaminggamer4534
      @gaminggamer4534 Před 7 lety +1

      Guaranteed more faster than any of the technology he mentioned.

    • @durrantmiller8810
      @durrantmiller8810 Před 7 lety +4

      More faster xD

    • @manutrollolol
      @manutrollolol Před 7 lety

      Isnt Ethernet the private network in a (big) company, for example Google? To transfer data between HQ which nobody else should see

    • @orpheus..
      @orpheus.. Před 7 lety +2

      +ManuTrollolol Nope. That's an INTRANET.
      Ethernet is just a fancy way of saying "interconnected by cable", but most people are unaware of this and use the term completely wrong. xD

    • @manutrollolol
      @manutrollolol Před 7 lety

      Oh okay, thanks! I heard Intranet before, mixed it up ^^

  • @isabelallegro
    @isabelallegro Před 7 lety

    No need for correction in 1:06, light is part of the EM spectrum, just like radiowaves are also part of the EM spectrum. --> "Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight."

  • @wompstopm123
    @wompstopm123 Před 7 lety +30

    this would be really useless. first off it doesnt matter how fast this light bulb can transfer data to a laptop, its still limited to your internet service provider and if you have fiber optic or not.
    and the light would not be able to pass through walls and would only work when your phone or laptop was in direct veiw of the lightbulb. which means its not as portable as wifi. to get faster wifi you can just get 802.11 ac wifi which is up to 900mbps of data from 1 router but its all up to your internet service provider and if you actually get that kind of speed to begin with

    • @charleswilliampemberton639
      @charleswilliampemberton639 Před 7 lety

      CaptainSkelebones you need the light pointing to a reciever which sends to your phone.

    • @Chevifier
      @Chevifier Před 7 lety

      Desktop would benefit from it though theyre usually wired lol

    • @wompstopm123
      @wompstopm123 Před 7 lety

      Charles Pemberton no you dont, cellphones work with radio waves not light

    • @user-np2qt8lq5j
      @user-np2qt8lq5j Před 7 lety

      light and radiowaves are both line of sight, meaning neither of them can pass through walls. The only way it "appears' to pass through walls is because it is exiting the router in a spherical shape meaning it bounces off the wall at every possible angle allowing it to reach other rooms and even other houses.

    • @wompstopm123
      @wompstopm123 Před 7 lety +6

      5 3 lol what dude? yes radio waves can go though walls

  • @dev1458
    @dev1458 Před 8 lety +13

    watch dogs might actually be a reality soon

  • @LarlemMagic
    @LarlemMagic Před 8 lety +24

    neat shit, but it doesn't go through walls or objects.

    • @smks8er
      @smks8er Před 8 lety

      we'll still have wifi around to compensate

    • @dennispremoli7950
      @dennispremoli7950 Před 8 lety +3

      and have to convenitntly replace everyt lightbulb on your house...mmmmh...I think Wi-fi would be considered a step forwared if it were to be invented in 2 years time compared to this. "Look, you can now acess internet around your house without changing everylight bulb and without the risk of losing connection because of a shadow you catsed on the device! YAY!"

    • @WayneJohnsonZastil
      @WayneJohnsonZastil Před 8 lety +1

      You should have LEDS anyways else wasting money and energy!

    • @paulgatto7207
      @paulgatto7207 Před 8 lety

      Exactly right. The down side of LiFi is it is "line of site". In other words, your internet connection (ie. LED bulb) has to have an un-obstructed view of your device. This is practical in an industrial setting (eg. factory setting, classroom or office area). In a home setting, you would need to have a LiFi transmitter in every room or confine you internet use certain areas of the home.

    • @dennispremoli7950
      @dennispremoli7950 Před 8 lety

      Paul Gatto No grammar nazi but you might want to change it to "line of SIGHT" :)

  • @3mar00ss6
    @3mar00ss6 Před 6 lety +13

    IT'S 2018 WHERE IS MY GODDAMN LIFI

  • @DrXaOs
    @DrXaOs Před 7 lety +38

    the next big thing: DARK FI!

  • @chikeezebilo6545
    @chikeezebilo6545 Před 8 lety +11

    Awesome.. Especially attractive bcos it can't be hacked from someone sitting on your fence.. But unattractive for the same damn reason.. You need one unit in every part of your opaque walled house for it to work properly.. And you e need a clear line of sight even at that.... If I put my phone under my pillow for example.. Signal is lost... I'm quite surprised this is just becoming a thing since optic fibre has been around for years.. It seems a natural progression. I'm sure lots of people have had the idea but not been able to practicalize it

    • @Mary42877
      @Mary42877 Před 8 lety

      +Chike Ezebilo yeah, you'd need high-tech home to use this comfortably..

    • @chikeezebilo6545
      @chikeezebilo6545 Před 8 lety

      Mary42877 Yeah.. You probably have to modulate your mains or something..

    • @chikeezebilo6545
      @chikeezebilo6545 Před 8 lety

      Ewgeni Weber if you use wifi anywhere in between the link.. You would be limited to wifi speed

    • @David-un4cs
      @David-un4cs Před 8 lety

      Well if you couple it with wi fi and have these "lights" on your ceiling you'd be able to reliably use the Internet at various speeds depending on what you need.

    • @chikeezebilo6545
      @chikeezebilo6545 Před 8 lety

      Ewgeni Weber good point so the speed would be an advantage when you are working.. Unfortunately introducing wifi might knock off the other advantages of using the system. Like security and safety to an extent.. But using a dual system can be quite helpful.. I see it catching on much quicker with offices than homes

  • @ikannunaplays
    @ikannunaplays Před 8 lety +6

    This is old tech, it is called IR. Used on many laptops and even on the PSP 1001-3001. Nothing new here.

    • @kevshorty
      @kevshorty Před 8 lety +5

      Yes it is old. But is it being used for more broader signals like the internet?

    • @MrHatoi
      @MrHatoi Před 8 lety +2

      IR and visible light are two different parts of the spectrum.

  • @martinavaslovik3433
    @martinavaslovik3433 Před 3 lety +2

    Six years later I don't see this anywhere.

  • @daviidon
    @daviidon Před 8 lety +12

    problem #1: light only travels in one direction unlike sound...

    • @he1986
      @he1986 Před 8 lety

      +ICE Starboy light, as sound, is waves, and can move in all directions, just depends on the source.

    • @143codydrewbieber
      @143codydrewbieber Před 8 lety

      +Borley4 no.. Light only travel in straight due to the high frequency.. It can bent like sound..

    • @ThatBulgarian
      @ThatBulgarian Před 8 lety

      +ICE Starboy how is that relevant? Are you saying that sound is a better medium for data transfer?

    • @143codydrewbieber
      @143codydrewbieber Před 8 lety

      ThatBulgarian Its actually a Yes and a No. Yes... Because of the lower frequency and longer lamda sound can travel more flexible and can go further than light. Whereas, due to the higher frequency light can't penetrate an object such as walls. But it's undeniable that light can transfer faster data than sound since the frequency is higher.

    • @dan339dan
      @dan339dan Před 8 lety +2

      +Borley4 Visible light, unlike radio wave, cannot travel through solid obstacles

  • @crazypunk2F
    @crazypunk2F Před 7 lety +30

    I honestly don't know how "Li-Fi" is going to work out. I mean, it doesn't sound very practical.

    • @magnehjonnevag
      @magnehjonnevag Před 5 lety +3

      It's way faster, and way safer.

    • @Iliceon
      @Iliceon Před 5 lety +1

      Not really, it wasn't mentioned here, but most Li-Fi researchers managed to get a stable data transfer through reflected light as well.

    • @parzival9639
      @parzival9639 Před 4 lety

      Indronil Chatterjee I dont think you now how light works

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt Před 4 lety +1

      They might as well call it Low-Fi. ;D
      I need a bit of clarification, at 5:14 South Korea's best internet speeds are at 100Mbps?? Woot? I mean even in the US we get well over that and we're not known for the best internet speeds. Puzzling.

    • @TomTom-vi6vp
      @TomTom-vi6vp Před 4 lety

      Dunkelheit yes I don’t understand a) how your phone would talk back to the LED bulb without a big bulb on the phone, and b) whether you’d need Ethernet cables to all the light sockets to connect it back to the router

  • @ChristopherGray00
    @ChristopherGray00 Před 8 lety +6

    he showed a huge flaw of Li-Fi right when he put his hand in front of the light, we can't access the internet if it is blocked by obstructions, you would need to make sure your device was exposed to the light, plus that you'd need multiple lights for multiple rooms, we don't need li-fi-, wi-fi is good as it is, no need to change it.

    • @ChristopherGray00
      @ChristopherGray00 Před 8 lety

      ***** but the problem is that there are no radio waves and because of that it cannot penetrate through walls like wifi does

    • @ChristopherGray00
      @ChristopherGray00 Před 8 lety

      ***** No, no they wont

    • @ChristopherGray00
      @ChristopherGray00 Před 8 lety

      ***** But it can't penetrate through walls.

    • @Valencia_Media
      @Valencia_Media Před 8 lety +2

      Did you not watch the video? LIFI makes the Internet much more secure. Which is why it doesn't go with walls.

    • @ChristopherGray00
      @ChristopherGray00 Před 8 lety

      Victor Valencia But that is a very bad thing if the light isn't in your own room

  • @HadToChangeMyName_YoutubeSucks

    I like how the cameraman gets a closeup of the receiver, so everyone can see the magic happening.

  • @whatadag3748
    @whatadag3748 Před 5 lety +4

    So lights on everywhere? Including daytime?

  • @RobotMowerTricks
    @RobotMowerTricks Před 8 lety +4

    this is an addition, not a replacement for Wi-Fi. people still want data when their phone is in their pocket

  • @shivarampersaud2332
    @shivarampersaud2332 Před 7 lety +4

    Do a video : Li - Fi vs Fiber Optics

  • @relucri
    @relucri Před 7 lety

    About security reasons . Some researches found that they can read data from hard drive led . They hack the led to send information troughs blinking . Same principle of lifi . They can read even from far distance and we are talking about a single led . Image that with room lights that are way more powerful . So it's still possible and quite easy to look over your network data , you just need a window and a good camera .

  • @Shakiahjprod
    @Shakiahjprod Před 7 lety +14

    I'm a gamer and just want to know if I won't lag anymore

    • @faezhelmi5872
      @faezhelmi5872 Před 7 lety

      Its like whats the point having 100 Gbps internet speed if your hardware technology is obselete? Need to be up to date.

    • @Nickname863
      @Nickname863 Před 7 lety

      As a gamer your Pc should be connected via a LAN-Cable anyways. So this technology wouldn't help. It is snake Oil anyways.

  • @DarkCrueDethAngel
    @DarkCrueDethAngel Před 6 lety +11

    Is LiFi gonna be released somewhere in the early 2020's or what?

  • @RailfanSrikrishna
    @RailfanSrikrishna Před 8 lety +8

    we can use xray as wifi by calling x-fi and i think speeds would reach upto terabytes

    • @fandigladion7051
      @fandigladion7051 Před 8 lety +1

      +sri krishna try first and tell me what cancer you got...

    • @MaurofdVzla
      @MaurofdVzla Před 8 lety

      +sri krishna In theory yes we could... But X-rays are harmful because they belong to the ionizing radiation type. That's why radiologist get a maximum "dosage" of radiation in hospital's radiology units. X-Fi sounds pretty cool though

    • @Alestrix76
      @Alestrix76 Před 8 lety

      +sri krishna terabytes is not a speed. I have 12 terabytes of raw storage space on my NAS. Do I have a fast NAS?

    • @carlluzbaslot6182
      @carlluzbaslot6182 Před 8 lety

      +sri krishna Try it and record it soo that we can see but sri krishna hey It is very risky hope you know that,but Nice idea X-fi Boy : )

    • @aBrightDarknessHD
      @aBrightDarknessHD Před 8 lety

      +sri krishna Yeah, just walk into your office and turn on your X Ray beam. Easy cancer.

  • @MrDarryl90210
    @MrDarryl90210 Před 7 lety +3

    Amazing technology from a source we never even considered before now...

  • @123Dragonden
    @123Dragonden Před 7 lety +6

    I wonder what the range on that Li-Fi is.

  • @rmsb1984
    @rmsb1984 Před 7 lety +11

    It only talked about download speed. how about Upload speed? would it be using a led similar to our remote control for uploads or would it still use WIFI? So LIFI technology to transmit and wifi to receive or led type pointing to the ceiling to able to upload?

    • @caesural
      @caesural Před 7 lety

      Screen of the device could flicker, or, yeah, Wi-Fi for uplink,

  • @cryptokarla
    @cryptokarla Před 2 lety +3

    So why hasn't this gone everywhere

  • @PresidentialWinner
    @PresidentialWinner Před 6 lety

    Gotta appreciate the fact that even though there were 2 minor mistakes, you still managed to correct them both. Precise work, considering this is the first video ever i have seen from you that contains mistakes!