EXCITING KNIGHT VS 2 PAWNS!!! CARLSEN VS GRIGORIANTS | WORLD BLITZ CHAMPIONSHIP 2018
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- SOURCE: NRK.NO
EXCITING KNIGHT VS 2 PAWNS!!! CARLSEN VS GRIGORIANTS | WORLD BLITZ CHAMPIONSHIP 2018
Hope you enjoy!
Thanks for watching.
Like and share for more videos.
Carlsen feeling like... Oh, God! Escaped the defeat.
its so funny to see how chess players try to avoid looking at each other ...
Usually in these types of stalemates, the queen is on f2. I think that since black's queen was on e3, it looked farther away and safer to capture. That's my guess, anyway.
It was a Draw? I thought Grigoriants won.
You thought wrong. Don't worry, it happens to all of us.
Draw
Isn't it 1-0 after b8(Q)? Instead of qxe3 1/2-1/2? [Edit: That might explain the cake-eating grin on Carlsen's face. Don't ever play the shell game with that guy!]
no. it's a draw. because the black queen can keep giving checks.white king can't get away if black is careful. and executing the promotion with 2 seconds on the clock may be risky, he needed to place the extra queen on b8 and remove the pawn and push the clock. he didn't need to risk it.
@@aleladebiri --- Maybe I see (haha). In simplest, it's h6 and e6 for the black Q to check, white Q interceding; and if black checks on the third rank and QxQ, stalemate? But if white plays Kg4 the clock wins the game because it's a two second increment only? (Honestly, I don't love waiting 20 mins for a player to make a move that often worsens his position, but I also don't love turning chess into a basketball game with only seconds. on the clock. Imo, which is amateur, every game should allow at least one minute per move, and five minutes max. It's just nuts, imo, to watch a GM ponder a tenth move that has already been played 10,000 times.)
How exactly to work that out breaks standards, but one possible is simply to reset the clock to five minutes after each move. Time limits are already arbitrary. After 40 moves, leave it at 4 minutes, after 60 moves, reduce it to 3 minutes, after 100 reduce it to 2 minutes, after 140 reduce it to 1 minute, after 200 shoot both players? Or just make it 5 per move regardless.
@@davesmith5656 There's a Fischer quote along the lines of: "If more than 15 minutes are spent on a move, it's probably a bad move." There's a limit to how deep we can accurately calculate anyway, and most GM's go as deep as they can fairly quickly. I guess nowadays they spend most time when they're trying to remember their memorizations and make sure everything is going as prepared, because that's the part where the game's fate is mostly decided, as these super gm's hardly let an advantage slip once they gain it. This is probably why they spend so much time on theoretical moves, to remember the exact move order of the long engine line they've prepared. Of course, at Fischer's times they didn't memorize extensive computer calculations before every game. The increment concept was also recommended by Fischer. This way, time pressure would still be a part of the game (as opposed to having fixed thinking time for each move), but not flagging. (Of course, I'm talking about 30-second classical increment, in 3'+2'' flagging is still a thing, and I agree that it's not pleasant)
@@aleladebiri ---- Thanks for the quote and explanations. There was something I read once about most men's attention being limited to seven of something. More than seven, and we group things. Another study found that somewhere around 250 people (IIRC) can maintain personal contact within a business organization, but beyond that, it starts getting compartmentalized ("synthetic" "anonymous"). I do appreciate that GM's can take a small advantage and expand it, but I've also seen mistakes that lead to losses (nerves, maybe). And more than just one or two games in which one poor move seemed to provoke another poor move. Curious. Maybe fear along the lines of "What could he see that I don't see?" It's fun to play, but I don't have the love to sit there for three hours. A bit like poker, I'll play for nickels and dimes! If the company is good!
b8- Q should be the winning move
Could some one please explain why this is a draw. I assumed that Carlson resigned. But when I saw the score it showed 1/2 - 1/2
Because when sergey captured the queen magnus has no room to move which results in stalemate so that's a draw 😊
@@B4XCode but why tf did he capture the queen :O
@@kyrpichko Because Grigoriants is under extreme pressure and he only had 1 second left
It seems Magnus' reputation won yet another game
Steal mate
Carsen feeling.....Oh my god ,I escaped from the defeat
Why is draw? Carlsen has only the king and the other player has the queen and another pawn to promote
Stalemate.
Why Grigoriants didn't take the pawn at 9:13 ?
Because knight can sacrifice later jumping to e4 and then g3 and h5 controling g7 ...and if he pass the pawn...knight cannot jump and reach that pawn because is far... understand?
@ 10:44 t is a draw If 1.b8=Q then Qe6+! (2. Qg4 then Qb3+!! if 3. QxQ its stalemate if Qg3 the perpetual check) if 2.Kh4 instead then Qg4+!! after 3.QxQ or KxQ then stalemate!
If Qb3+ whit can play Qbg3. And no more checks
Calsen E um gênio kkkk
Wow..genius carlen
Wtw he losses
May be king not come near black king...better near to pawn... there are more chances to win
Its about very injury time cause b8 Q can't be seen anymore, that's the mindplay 😁
G O A T
Big game
best skill...
Carlsen will not lose if Grigoriants trades Queens at 9:47?
no , in that case Carlsen won the game
It would be a draw because both sides would queen
@@peej2164 no white it's is complity winning because after b5 he promote before and have and extra pawn
Yeah, white is winning after he forces a trade of queens :/
yes white won. 1 ..Qxe3 2 Kxe3 b5 3 d4 b6 4 d3 b7 5 d2 b8=Q 6 d1Q Qf4+ and force exence QQ
who won ?
Draw, stalemate 😊
Wow .
3 pawns??
Why didnt he go for a queen?weird
Its gonna be stalemate dude
M
"MAGNUS CARLOTICUS"
Oh draw... Carlsen has no any move ..
Rey ahogado es un bicho
Draw!! Just it
why did he captured the queen
Because if maguns's oponent doesn't capture the queen then maguns capture and the king has to capture in the next movement because it will be in check. The result is draw because the maguns's king has no legal movement. It's a stalemate.
@@johnnylabes6931 - Not true. You can't stalemate an opponent with just a king. If black plays 1 ... Qxg3 2. Kxg3 Kg1 is a legal move. What I'm looking at is 1. b8(Q) Qh6+ and trying to dope out whether there's a draw by repetition or something after 2. Kg4. Seems to me Grigoriants threw away a win.
@@davesmith5656 You are correct buddy !! may be the time pressure !!
I think its already forced draw at 10:34 ..qh6+ lol
@@johnnylabes6931 thats why magnus doesnt capture, instead put his king at the corner to stalemate
Se avesse promosso il pedone invece che prendere la donna avrebbe vinto facile