You can only imagine what kind of people Col. Armstrong and his family were, to have such loyal servants and devoted family members who would risk their lives and personal honor to avenge their deaths.
I agree. I know John committed suicide, and I know that the murder committed by the family and friends of the Armstrongs are still questionable, but there is no doubt that the love of the Armtrongs, their family, and friends for one another is one of the strongest the world has ever had. I am sure that on account of their deeds for good, I am sure the Most High would understand for He is merciful, and also, in the first place if the courts in America (in Poirot's reality) resisted the temptation of bribary from Casseti and punished him accordingly, I am sure this murder on the Orient Express would not have happened. Those who murdered Casseti are not truly killers, they are just people who need a chance to heal.
@@cush6827 Most people that live today and have probably only watched the movie weren't even born then. Not all read the books. Why do you mind if someone explains this to them?
That was an amazing sound editing, when the music stopped and you only hear a small grunt when Pfeiffer makes the final stab. The somber score leading up to that moment was powerful.
I never read the book, so the twist that ALL of the suspects were the killers took me by surprise and is easily one of the best twists I’ve ever seen in a mystery.
@@briluna560 Just my opinion though. In the book, Poirot is cold and indifferent towards the conclusion of the case, whereas in the movie, both David Sachet and Branagh were struggling to accept it, since Poirot always stood by his principle and justice. But this time, he struggled and accepted the reality. The movie shows us alot of human emotion and how one, who is always on the side of hard cold facts must also this time make decision with their heart instead. So I think many would relate on how Poirot sees this case. But, just my opinion though, ofcourse there are more cases where book > movie, but yeah this movie isn't bad at adapting the novel.
"My Dear, Colonel Armstrong finally, I can answer your letter at least with the thoughts in my head and the feeling in my heart that somewhere, you can hear me. I have now discovered the truth of the case, and it is profoundly disturbing. I have seen the fracture of the human soul. So many broken lives, so much pain and anger, giving way to the poison of deep grief, until one crime became many. I have always wanted to believe that man is rational and civilized. My very existence depends upon this hope, upon order and method and the little gray cells. But now, perhaps, I am asked to listen, instead to my heart." Hercule Poirot
It's clear that they hate the fact that they've been driven to commit murder, but there is no other choice. Letting him walk free, after he destroyed all their lives in addition to the Armstrongs, is just not an option. Most of us would say with confidence that we could never be driven to end the life of another human. So would they, once upon a time.
One point brought up in the book is that by each of the twelve only stabbing him once, they couldn't know which of them inflicted fatal wounds. (When the doctor, (who in the book is not part of the conspiracy, but just a passenger in another car brought in to examine Ratchett) examines the body he speculated that of the twelve wounds, three were immediately fatal, several more were deep, but a few were shallow and not lethal themselves). It's like how with a firing squad, one member has a blank cartridge so they each can hold onto the chance that one of them didn't actually shoot.
I still think this is one of the best scenes in cinema. it's like how Hercules said, one murder of a little girl, so many lives torn apart. it really puts it in perspective, and I loved ever single bit of it. Michelle Pfeiffer's performance as Lydia Arden/Goldenberg was stunning as well, and when she says "I already died with Daisy" in the next scene. great movie, great mystery, 10/10.
@@julianprasaja2227 Just let it go. I am not trying to be insulting, but no one reads anymore. I saw this opening night at a small theatre in my hometown, and when I mentioned how I like this movie even better than the book (which is HIGH praise from me as I usually don't think movies even come close), only one person (who was probably in her 60s/70s) even KNEW there was a book! And most haven't even heard of Agatha Christie!
@@julianprasaja2227 Possibly, but I recall a friend of mine who called Poirot "Hercules Paul" I thought he was joking until some time later when I realised he never heard of the famous detective
You can see the grief on their faces as they each take their turn stabbing the creep. I hate it when the only form of justice available comes off as revenge and good people are forced to do something against their morals to do what's right.
Never have I seen a difference between Justice and revenge I think we can all agree that there is an in-between line that we all must choose at some point in our lives
This scene made me want to cry, as they all watched one of the few memories they had of daisy reminding themselves why they are their and who they are doing it for, all of the improvising to try and through him off of everyone’s trail it was amazing
This is the most heartbreaking scene. Their faces show how much hate and anger and sadness they all feel, the overwhelming atmosphere of the murder and the sudden climax to the drawnout plan they had. Just wow.
Throughout the movie I was like "mmmm okay, where is this going?" and then this scene came... crying like I would 10+ years ago from movies that are not being made anymore. If anyone can recommend me more movies like this which crush your heart at the end... do let me know!
In addition to all these suggested in the comment section, might I also suggest Vanilla Sky from Tom Cruise? It's a truly underrated gem and I hope you like it.
THANKS FOR LOOKING MY VIDEO SIR I AM GLARE OF YOUR THAT YOU SEE MY VIDEO AND COMMENT THANK YOU PLZ SHARE THE VIDEO TO YOUR FRIENDS AND SUSCRIBE THANK YOU AGAIN SIRE SOO MUCH
This is what I love about Kenneth Branagh as a director (and as an actor too). He will always make sure that the viewer will feel the emotion by watching the most important scene.
We did the play when I was in high school. I wasn't main cast, but I was in a crew role where I got to stand and watch this scene. My friends did a heart-wrenching job. It really breaks your heart when you see how the death of one little girl tore apart her family and broke so many people. How all of these people were willing to give up everything for the sake of that family. How there was so much pain in each of them. In the play, each of them stabs Cassetti once, crying out who it was for. It climbs and climbs until Linda Arden is on the verge of tears and she screams at the top of her lungs "For my grandchild!" I almost cried every single time.
Honestly, when i realised they all killed him because one man caused such a domino effect to everyone, i was shocked. But who wouldn’t do what they did? One of the best detective film I’ve ever seen.
@@PopADoseYo I thought Desyat Negrityat, the Russian version of And Then There Were None, was actually really good, and stuck quite faithfully to the book. I agree the rest of the movies aren't up to much though. Book's much better.
According to Harry Potter’s universe, a soul is split in murder. This day 12 souls were fractured. Fall my tears for those who have suffered all because of that one man 😢 Honestly this was one of the best movies I have ever scene and it’s rating did it as much justice as casseti’s crime. This movie had it all, the emotion, the story, the twist, the drive, and together had been stitched together to make a movie that deserved an award. I cried when watching this movie because the emotion from it was real for me. 😔
When the doctor blamed himself I was mad. I had Bouc’s exact same reaction. How such a great mistery would end like that, I knew something was off. And then this scene put everything together. Wow, I haven’t read the book, but I will definitely do it now. The performance of the actors was marvelous. I cried, so much pain in one scene, many innocent people, so much injustice and revenge: the most realistic feeling.
PoPaDoseYo Music plays a huge role in a movie. The song in this scene sets the mood. The scene would be pretty empty without it. And yeah... I get the f+
It's a relief that poirot let them go not only bcos they are not murderers by heart. But bcos if he decided to let them get arrested, he might let rachett win and have the last laugh.
How so? Ratchett WON here. By killing him, they became like him: criminals. They decided that criminal acts were the ONLY way that worked. Mob justice, lynchings, hangings, vigilantism, have killed more innocents than guilty parties. And they're all cowards anyway. They paralyze him, gang up on him, and then they don't have the FUCKING GUTS to take FUCKING RESPONSIBILITY for their actions. Cowards. Like Ratchett. Ratchett won.
@@Saberblast58 No, it's not Ratchett's fault. This is entirely on them. They prepared this for more than a year, meticulously. Coldly. Plenty of time to stop. To turn back. They didn't, preferring to craft a semi-ritualistic 'punishment' that they felt fit the crime, spent months on it. Then, they tried to hide it. I mean, if it was just, why hide it?
The most shocking part of the revelation to me when reading the book was that the conductor was involved in it too and Mrs Hubbard was in fact Linda Arden, the actress that many passengers talked about. If they occupied all the compartments on the carriage then the task would have been easily accomplished and the police would believe their story since it is validated by all the passengers. By chance, Poirot got a space on the carriage so they had to make adjustments. What is interesting about the ending is that Poirot gave two solution, one is the absolute truth and the other is a fantasy that would allow none of them to be inciriminated. Mr Bouc and the doctor chose the lie because I guess incriminating just one passenger would almost be injustice. This is ironic because the person is a murderer but the victim was a bigger criminal. By chosing the first solution and covering up the crime, the director of the company and the doctor become part of the plot. However, Poirot is not part of the crime because he deduced the truth and gave two solution to the problem. He asked the director to pick one solution and did not provide his opinion on it.
I always think of Thrawn's last words in Star Wars: The Last Command: "it was so artistically done". I read the book, so I knew what would happen, but this is a favourite or 2nd favourite depiction of it (next to the 1974 Albert Finney film)
This was the scene that made me cry.how the death of the people that were precious to them hurt them😭even watching the film of the past mempries of daisy and the parents as their resolve before they have their revenge
I prefer David Suchet as Poirot. I'm more used to him. But for me the particular scene was better than the one in the previous adaptation. It sticks with you.
I’m into a manga/anime series called Detective Conan; the creator Gosho Aoyama used elements of Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie. I’m wondering that how the concept culprits or suspects having such specific ties to the person gettin killed in which how the person greatly wronged them would was used in Gosho’s series.
Extremely hard to pick a side with this. It really shows there isn't always a distinctive right or wrong choice, most honestly falls somewhere in the middle 🤔 and the ending conclusion is just simply an understanding ❤ INCREDIBLE ACTING FROM CAST❤
I request everyone not to justify the murder of Cassetti, remember two wrongs do not make something right. Vengeance is a poison which consumes man and woman alike, vengeance has the power to destroy the mankind we know. If those 12 dumbs did figure out who cassetti was and what he did, they can simply procure enough evidence to make him spend rest of his life in prison, imagine being locked in a cell waiting for your death, while inside you are dying knowing that you can never see what the world was like before. Imo this is worse and more deserving punishment than stabbing someone 12 times over where a person dies immediately after first 2 without any suffering. When civilized people start taking law in their hands they stop being "civilized" or humans even. Thanks for reading such a big comment. Have a good one!!
@@williammorahan4907I believe they could have handed him over to the police after gathering enough circumstantial evidence else even if they killed him due to some misjudged sense of justice, they could have surrendered then, that way their conscience remains clear
Dude, they don't even have the evidence for that even if they do, you forgot cassetti is literally a businessman and use his dirty money (via his forgeries of art and antiques for sells) to bribe the courts and walk away scott free from justice and legal system, and do not say macqueen will just steal his money to prevent the bribery, that won't even work because he'll just either fired him from the job or kill him with his gun or in actuality both options. And you forgot the 1930s justice legal system in America was actually corrupt, unjust and systematic discriminatory back then.
To be honest, I kinda like how the Daisy Armstrong case was handled better in this better than the old movie because the way it was handled in the old movie felt a little obvious
“A murder should have one victim. When Ratchett kills Daisy Armstrong, a dozen lives are broken, deformed, ended. They demand justice. Of all these wounded souls, we must answer… And so it is done. For the death of the innocent, a life for a life. Revenge.”
In myopinion if you think about it, McQueen didnt really have a solid ground. His father didn't work for Armstrong and Casetti didn't attack him. The public wanted a suspect and the police gave one to his father and when it was found that she wasn't it and she killed herself again it was the public that went against his father. The others had a personal stake in it with Cassetti because it was his crime that caused the maid to be blamed and his crime that cause a mother to lose her daughters (one died and one to drugs) and a granddaughter. As i said, just my opinion. Ive watched this one and death on the nile many times and still love how they go.
That's probably just me but, if I were murdered, I wouldn't want my family to waste their lives hunting the person who killed me for revenge. They'd all have one life and I don't want them all to waste it all because of me. I would want them to grieve and move on
This made me cry the first two time than the 3th time I dead ass started laughing because the way they look Stabbing him and the Camera angle but also the music got me
I know John committed suicide, and I know that the murder committed by the family and friends of the Armstrongs are still questionable, but there is no doubt that the love of the Armtrongs, their family, and friends for one another is the one of the strongest the world has ever had. I am sure that on account of their deeds for good, I am sure the Most High would understand for He is merciful, and also, in the first place if the courts in America (in Poirot's reality) resisted the temptation of bribary from Casseti and punished him accordingly, I am sure this murder on the Orient Express would not have happened. Those who murdered Casseti are not truly killers, they are just people who need a chance to heal.
What I never understood was, in the book, instead of waking up Poirot with the fake cry, French voice behind Ratchet's door, Linda's "man-in-room" comment, and kimono woman (whoever that was in the story), why not just keep it simple and kill Ratchet without waking Poirot? Why bring his attention to anything at all? Also, why did MacQueen decide to speak in French instead of English behind Ratchet's door? That's kinda random to me.
It was all to throw the suspensions off them so that Poirot would believe that a random person came from off the train and killed Ratchet, now the speaking in French was actually a mistake on Mcqueens part because he forgot that Ratchet didnt speak French at all
@@sarahellynhahn1569 Oh, but he didn't have to speak French at all; why not English? And I get why they needed Poirot to think it was some stranger who killed Ratchett, but again, what if they just killed Ratchett without awakening Poirot at all, so he doesn't ever know Ratchet was killed, and pretend all is fine the next day, aside from teh snowdrift?
@@jakebastian6726 To set up a fake time of death and confuse Poirot they broke the watch so that would also help set a time of death and since the doctor was in on it he would also help set up a fake time of death and that way they would all have alibis that they could back up with one another
@@jakebastian6726 Also his voice would have been recognized if he spoke in english and Poirot would know it was Mcqueen not Ratchet who spoke behind the door
@@sarahellynhahn1569 I'm sorry---I think you've misunderstood me. I'll clarify thoroughly this time: wouldn't it have been better if the passengers just killed Ratchett without awakening Poirot? Like, make the illusion there is no murder at all, to ultimately eliminate their chances of being exposed? I'll break it down in steps to really clarify: step 1. _don't_ wake Poirot up and put on an act for him in the middle of the night. Step 2. go to Ratchet's room and kill him, while Poirot is asleep. Step 3. Leave no clues whatsoever--because Poirot isn't going to investigate if he _doesn't_ know Ratchet was killed. Step 4. continue your time on the train normally and nonchalantly, with only the snowdrift as the burden. After all, Poirot's not interrogating people, since there's no murder case to investigate (as far as he knows). _That's_ what I meant by my question. Does that help you understand what I'm asking?
I’m happy to say that I managed to solve it at the end after my dad who seen the movie before told me to redirect my attention to the fact that the body was stabbed so randomly
Not to be that guy but if I am correct, Cassetti was never tried because he fled the country after the murder. Wouldn’t it have been better to alert the authorities of where he was? Or arrange a kidnapping to bring him back to be prosecuted? Just saying, there was a way to get justice without living with the fact that they committed murder.
This movie is great, it’s just a shame they couldn’t have stuck to the novel more.. so many missed opportunities and flaws to make it more action that mystery
You can only imagine what kind of people Col. Armstrong and his family were, to have such loyal servants and devoted family members who would risk their lives and personal honor to avenge their deaths.
Please do not explain a story we all know already because it came out in 1934.
I agree. I know John committed suicide, and I know that the murder committed by the family and friends of the Armstrongs are still questionable, but there is no doubt that the love of the Armtrongs, their family, and friends for one another is one of the strongest the world has ever had. I am sure that on account of their deeds for good, I am sure the Most High would understand for He is merciful, and also, in the first place if the courts in America (in Poirot's reality) resisted the temptation of bribary from Casseti and punished him accordingly, I am sure this murder on the Orient Express would not have happened. Those who murdered Casseti are not truly killers, they are just people who need a chance to heal.
@@benedictkiswanto4692 Justice does not come from government. It comes from the righteous.
@@AlseyMiller , I did not mention or refer to the government. I meant in the legal justice system.
@@cush6827 Most people that live today and have probably only watched the movie weren't even born then. Not all read the books. Why do you mind if someone explains this to them?
This scene made me cry, you can feel the agony the loss of that child caused in everyone as they took their part in the murder.
This scene made me ugly cry
@AStoryGood Justice failed all these people and the loved ones they lost, so they were forced to take vengeance on the man who caused their grief.
That was an amazing sound editing, when the music stopped and you only hear a small grunt when Pfeiffer makes the final stab. The somber score leading up to that moment was powerful.
They should all be charged with murder
@@acdesegurgels8663 there's always one... get a life
The piano music and the flashbacks makes this the most heart wrenching scene.
SUPER DUPERR AGREEEE
Yes perfect together together
I was going to comment that
Anyone know the name of the music?
@@quinnoconnor2605 Its called "Justice" by Patric Doyle
I never read the book, so the twist that ALL of the suspects were the killers took me by surprise and is easily one of the best twists I’ve ever seen in a mystery.
Rarely and fortunately for us, this time the movie is better than the book. Goddamn Branagh KNOWS how to adapt the book!
@@robbert6393 HELL NO
@@briluna560 how so?
@@robbert6393 there is no way this movie is better than the book, actually its an awful adaptation
@@briluna560 Just my opinion though. In the book, Poirot is cold and indifferent towards the conclusion of the case, whereas in the movie, both David Sachet and Branagh were struggling to accept it, since Poirot always stood by his principle and justice. But this time, he struggled and accepted the reality. The movie shows us alot of human emotion and how one, who is always on the side of hard cold facts must also this time make decision with their heart instead. So I think many would relate on how Poirot sees this case.
But, just my opinion though, ofcourse there are more cases where book > movie, but yeah this movie isn't bad at adapting the novel.
"My Dear, Colonel Armstrong finally, I can answer your letter at least with the thoughts in my head and the feeling in my heart that somewhere, you can hear me. I have now discovered the truth of the case, and it is profoundly disturbing. I have seen the fracture of the human soul. So many broken lives, so much pain and anger, giving way to the poison of deep grief, until one crime became many. I have always wanted to believe that man is rational and civilized. My very existence depends upon this hope, upon order and method and the little gray cells. But now, perhaps, I am asked to listen, instead to my heart."
Hercule Poirot
I cried so much...to realize they couldnt have done it alone...but found the strength in their collective pain...that is sooo sad...
It's clear that they hate the fact that they've been driven to commit murder, but there is no other choice. Letting him walk free, after he destroyed all their lives in addition to the Armstrongs, is just not an option.
Most of us would say with confidence that we could never be driven to end the life of another human. So would they, once upon a time.
One point brought up in the book is that by each of the twelve only stabbing him once, they couldn't know which of them inflicted fatal wounds. (When the doctor, (who in the book is not part of the conspiracy, but just a passenger in another car brought in to examine Ratchett) examines the body he speculated that of the twelve wounds, three were immediately fatal, several more were deep, but a few were shallow and not lethal themselves). It's like how with a firing squad, one member has a blank cartridge so they each can hold onto the chance that one of them didn't actually shoot.
We can never really say what we would or would not do in a situation we ourselves have never lived through.
@@agenttheater5 wise words
@@TorontoJediMaster doesnt matter they all took part in the conspiracy they all would get charged
People actually have no idea how easy it actually is to drive a normal person to do even the most simple yet horrible of things
I still think this is one of the best scenes in cinema. it's like how Hercules said, one murder of a little girl, so many lives torn apart. it really puts it in perspective, and I loved ever single bit of it. Michelle Pfeiffer's performance as Lydia Arden/Goldenberg was stunning as well, and when she says "I already died with Daisy" in the next scene. great movie, great mystery, 10/10.
Hercules was never a detective.
@@julianprasaja2227 Just let it go. I am not trying to be insulting, but no one reads anymore. I saw this opening night at a small theatre in my hometown, and when I mentioned how I like this movie even better than the book (which is HIGH praise from me as I usually don't think movies even come close), only one person (who was probably in her 60s/70s) even KNEW there was a book! And most haven't even heard of Agatha Christie!
@@SJHFoto maybe he mixed it up with The 12 Labors of Hercules, I dunno.
@@julianprasaja2227 Possibly, but I recall a friend of mine who called Poirot "Hercules Paul" I thought he was joking until some time later when I realised he never heard of the famous detective
@@SJHFoto I guess they never knew the superior 1974 version then???
You can see the grief on their faces as they each take their turn stabbing the creep. I hate it when the only form of justice available comes off as revenge and good people are forced to do something against their morals to do what's right.
Like Thanos and joker
@@themanwithredglasses6206 Don't ever bring up Thanos with me. I hate Marvel for ruining Spider-Man.
@@ericsander3620 I hate MCU Spider-Man as well, he looks like a Fuckin parody but I’m still fascinated with Thanos
@@themanwithredglasses6206 I prefer the Kingpin. Never underestimate a street-level villain.
@@ericsander3620 What does this have to do with the movie
Never have I seen a difference between Justice and revenge I think we can all agree that there is an in-between line that we all must choose at some point in our lives
This scene made me want to cry, as they all watched one of the few memories they had of daisy reminding themselves why they are their and who they are doing it for, all of the improvising to try and through him off of everyone’s trail it was amazing
Yessssss that a grandmother
Angelica finally gets to kill Jack Sparrow! 🏴☠️
LOL yeah I didn't notice
The author of the novel and the movie deserves my standing ovation 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
The author of the novel is Agatha Cristie.
This is the most heartbreaking scene. Their faces show how much hate and anger and sadness they all feel, the overwhelming atmosphere of the murder and the sudden climax to the drawnout plan they had. Just wow.
I wonder how long have they been waiting that knock on their door and how they felt when they stabed the knife into Casseite's body
@Ruby Studio the words of a pure heart, I salute you.
Throughout the movie I was like "mmmm okay, where is this going?" and then this scene came... crying like I would 10+ years ago from movies that are not being made anymore.
If anyone can recommend me more movies like this which crush your heart at the end... do let me know!
Forgotten 2017, Memoir of a Murderer 2017, Zodiac 2007, Se7en 1995.
Damn
@@krishpau2979 I can agree with that. That movie nearly killed my heart
Schindler's List, The Green Mile, Hachiko.
In addition to all these suggested in the comment section, might I also suggest Vanilla Sky from Tom Cruise? It's a truly underrated gem and I hope you like it.
An emotional take on a famous murder mystery novel starring the world’s greatest Belgian detective... Hercule Poirot
THANKS FOR LOOKING MY VIDEO SIR I AM GLARE OF YOUR THAT YOU SEE MY VIDEO AND COMMENT THANK YOU PLZ SHARE THE VIDEO TO YOUR FRIENDS AND SUSCRIBE THANK YOU AGAIN SIRE SOO MUCH
This is what I love about Kenneth Branagh as a director (and as an actor too). He will always make sure that the viewer will feel the emotion by watching the most important scene.
@@Beginstheman This scene is so good yet I prefer the Poirot player by David Suchete. I could feel all the emotions there much stringer than here.
I was tearing up but I just started crying when Linda said “I already died with Daisy”….no one should ever experience such a loss. 😓😓😭🥺
My eyes started welling up with tears the second I saw them all together watching the film of Daisy.
We did the play when I was in high school. I wasn't main cast, but I was in a crew role where I got to stand and watch this scene. My friends did a heart-wrenching job. It really breaks your heart when you see how the death of one little girl tore apart her family and broke so many people. How all of these people were willing to give up everything for the sake of that family. How there was so much pain in each of them. In the play, each of them stabs Cassetti once, crying out who it was for. It climbs and climbs until Linda Arden is on the verge of tears and she screams at the top of her lungs "For my grandchild!" I almost cried every single time.
Another great fact is that there were 12 stab wounds, a typical number For a jury. Where casetti escaped judicial law, but not his crimes
Everyone’s facial expression in this scene is just 👌🏻 Michelle gives me the shivers!
They killed the murderer... for justice.
For the Armstrong family.
I like how everyone squeezes in that tiny little room
I was just thinkin bout it too😅🤭🤣💯👍🏿
I just want to say that what a book Christie has written 😌😌👏👏👏👏
I cried SO HARD on this part. I was not expecting to have emotions like thought in a murder mystery film.
Same! I kind of thought It was going to be a silly murder movie and THEN BOOM SUPRISE
Honestly, when i realised they all killed him because one man caused such a domino effect to everyone, i was shocked. But who wouldn’t do what they did? One of the best detective film I’ve ever seen.
A mother/grandmother’s revenge. Perfect. For Daisy 😢
Just watched the movie, I didn't expect this at all...but justice was served for little Daisy. The whole scene is just perfect.
Mob justice is never justice.
@@Ares99999 It is. No matter how much you don't want to accept it.
@_Spy_ It is not. This wasn't justice. It was malicious. They wanted satisfaction from cold-blooded murder.
Their souls must be so broken that go through all this to murder this one man
It's truly saddening
When they hand her the knife. The look on her face. Absolute fucking chills. What a fantastic movie and incredibly moving scene
1:12 you know, I'm something of a murderer myself
Lmao
"Godspeed Jack Sparrow...Oh."
*Stab*
I love this movie never expected all of them
Now go read her better story And Then There Were None for an even crazier murder mystery. Dont watch the movies of it though, theyre all awful.
@@PopADoseYo I thought Desyat Negrityat, the Russian version of And Then There Were None, was actually really good, and stuck quite faithfully to the book. I agree the rest of the movies aren't up to much though. Book's much better.
@@PopADoseYo I have a soft spot for the Donald Plesance version.
The music in this scene is on point
i need to know the name of this track
@@mrmoezy5042 Oh! Its my favorite track on the sountrack. Look for "Justice" in the orient express soundtrack!
@@Light14Lilium do u know any other songs like this one?
@@mrmoezy5042 the vocal version of it is called "Never forget" but overall the soundtrack is great.
@@mrmoezy5042 But if you want specifics...as in other instrumental artists...I got a long list
Underrated. Fuck the critics. This was a very well-made film.
Man was this emotional, when he said all of you.. Man the emotions got high real fast
According to Harry Potter’s universe, a soul is split in murder. This day 12 souls were fractured. Fall my tears for those who have suffered all because of that one man 😢
Honestly this was one of the best movies I have ever scene and it’s rating did it as much justice as casseti’s crime. This movie had it all, the emotion, the story, the twist, the drive, and together had been stitched together to make a movie that deserved an award. I cried when watching this movie because the emotion from it was real for me. 😔
Agustin Camejo I didn’t know that. That’s convenient
@@amethystrose3480 Lockhart. And his ex-wife Emma Thompson was Trewlawny.
agenttheater5 got it. I’m horrible with actors and names and faces so it took me a bit to figure it out.
When the doctor blamed himself I was mad. I had Bouc’s exact same reaction. How such a great mistery would end like that, I knew something was off. And then this scene put everything together. Wow, I haven’t read the book, but I will definitely do it now. The performance of the actors was marvelous. I cried, so much pain in one scene, many innocent people, so much injustice and revenge: the most realistic feeling.
I love this movie and this scene
The music made the scene. Great piece from Patrick Doyle
I like how the train seems to be a watchful spectator in the shots of Poirot.
Stolen.
every time I watch this I cry, this is my favourite movie of all time
The music is so sad and made me tear up in this scene
The music? Lol, not the actions and the words...jeez you missed the entire point.
PoPaDoseYo
Music plays a huge role in a movie. The song in this scene sets the mood. The scene would be pretty empty without it. And yeah... I get the f+
@@china_sickness7005 I agree. I was just surprised to see music only lol. Its a very emotional scene and the music does hit the spot.
PoPaDoseYo
Sorry if my reply seemed rude. I was being too aggressive. I don’t like to be a jerk when I reply to people so I apologize
@@china_sickness7005 No worries! Ive been the same way. I was rude as well a bit!
You can see how their faces are not for hate but pain and sadness
The music is the best part.
It's a relief that poirot let them go not only bcos they are not murderers by heart. But bcos if he decided to let them get arrested, he might let rachett win and have the last laugh.
How so? Ratchett WON here. By killing him, they became like him: criminals. They decided that criminal acts were the ONLY way that worked. Mob justice, lynchings, hangings, vigilantism, have killed more innocents than guilty parties.
And they're all cowards anyway. They paralyze him, gang up on him, and then they don't have the FUCKING GUTS to take FUCKING RESPONSIBILITY for their actions.
Cowards. Like Ratchett.
Ratchett won.
@@Ares99999 well in that case, either way, rachett always win the end bcos he has successfully ruined their lives and their sense of morality.
@@Saberblast58 No, it's not Ratchett's fault. This is entirely on them. They prepared this for more than a year, meticulously. Coldly. Plenty of time to stop. To turn back. They didn't, preferring to craft a semi-ritualistic 'punishment' that they felt fit the crime, spent months on it.
Then, they tried to hide it. I mean, if it was just, why hide it?
This movie broke me apart and cried so much. I never read the book, never watched the old version. So it broke me so deep.
The most shocking part of the revelation to me when reading the book was that the conductor was involved in it too and Mrs Hubbard was in fact Linda Arden, the actress that many passengers talked about. If they occupied all the compartments on the carriage then the task would have been easily accomplished and the police would believe their story since it is validated by all the passengers. By chance, Poirot got a space on the carriage so they had to make adjustments.
What is interesting about the ending is that Poirot gave two solution, one is the absolute truth and the other is a fantasy that would allow none of them to be inciriminated. Mr Bouc and the doctor chose the lie because I guess incriminating just one passenger would almost be injustice. This is ironic because the person is a murderer but the victim was a bigger criminal. By chosing the first solution and covering up the crime, the director of the company and the doctor become part of the plot. However, Poirot is not part of the crime because he deduced the truth and gave two solution to the problem. He asked the director to pick one solution and did not provide his opinion on it.
This plot twist is very insane to watch!
So Angelica finally got her revenge on Captain Jack Sparrow
1:17 This for Daisy, this for Sonia, and this for all the children he killed, you monster!
I always think of Thrawn's last words in Star Wars: The Last Command: "it was so artistically done". I read the book, so I knew what would happen, but this is a favourite or 2nd favourite depiction of it (next to the 1974 Albert Finney film)
This is one of my best Kenneth Branagh movies I've seen, outside of Hamlet from 1995
Por Daisy Armstrong 💔
This was the scene that made me cry.how the death of the people that were precious to them hurt them😭even watching the film of the past mempries of daisy and the parents as their resolve before they have their revenge
Jesus said " He who is without sin, cast the first stone". Well, the family was without sin, so their friends and family cast the first stone.
U just had to bring Jesus here huh????
But the friends and family were NOT without sin.
That knife is awfully clean, for having stabbed someone 12 times.
I love Johnny Depp so this kinda hurt
Me too
I had no idea he was in this movie
Yeah! Why did he have to play the villain. 😞
Such an emotional scene, music by Pat Doyle is superb
So Rey Skywalker became a Sith after all and now she is Catwoman's apprentice.
I prefer David Suchet as Poirot. I'm more used to him. But for me the particular scene was better than the one in the previous adaptation. It sticks with you.
I’m into a manga/anime series called Detective Conan; the creator Gosho Aoyama used elements of Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie.
I’m wondering that how the concept culprits or suspects having such specific ties to the person gettin killed in which how the person greatly wronged them would was used in Gosho’s series.
r.i.p johnny dead. you'll be missed. by amber hurt
She probably watches this scene over and over again and pretends she's one of the killers
I can't believe Rey and Angelica killed Jack Sparrow. Well i do can believe Angelica did it but i can't believe Rey did it
This scene hit me a feeling crippled down my vein.
That wasn’t murder. That was justice.
Extremely hard to pick a side with this. It really shows there isn't always a distinctive right or wrong choice, most honestly falls somewhere in the middle 🤔 and the ending conclusion is just simply an understanding ❤ INCREDIBLE ACTING FROM CAST❤
I request everyone not to justify the murder of Cassetti, remember two wrongs do not make something right. Vengeance is a poison which consumes man and woman alike, vengeance has the power to destroy the mankind we know. If those 12 dumbs did figure out who cassetti was and what he did, they can simply procure enough evidence to make him spend rest of his life in prison, imagine being locked in a cell waiting for your death, while inside you are dying knowing that you can never see what the world was like before. Imo this is worse and more deserving punishment than stabbing someone 12 times over where a person dies immediately after first 2 without any suffering. When civilized people start taking law in their hands they stop being "civilized" or humans even. Thanks for reading such a big comment. Have a good one!!
Should they have confessed at the end?
Or should they have let him live?
@@williammorahan4907I believe they could have handed him over to the police after gathering enough circumstantial evidence else even if they killed him due to some misjudged sense of justice, they could have surrendered then, that way their conscience remains clear
@@williammorahan4907 agreed after all those two options are literally a lose-lose situation
Dude, they don't even have the evidence for that even if they do, you forgot cassetti is literally a businessman and use his dirty money (via his forgeries of art and antiques for sells) to bribe the courts and walk away scott free from justice and legal system, and do not say macqueen will just steal his money to prevent the bribery, that won't even work because he'll just either fired him from the job or kill him with his gun or in actuality both options. And you forgot the 1930s justice legal system in America was actually corrupt, unjust and systematic discriminatory back then.
Esta es mi escena favorita de toda la película...
To be honest, I kinda like how the Daisy Armstrong case was handled better in this better than the old movie because the way it was handled in the old movie felt a little obvious
The family have some good friends
“A murder should have one victim.
When Ratchett kills Daisy Armstrong, a dozen lives are broken, deformed, ended.
They demand justice.
Of all these wounded souls, we must answer…
And so it is done.
For the death of the innocent, a life for a life.
Revenge.”
such a great movie...
In myopinion if you think about it, McQueen didnt really have a solid ground. His father didn't work for Armstrong and Casetti didn't attack him. The public wanted a suspect and the police gave one to his father and when it was found that she wasn't it and she killed herself again it was the public that went against his father. The others had a personal stake in it with Cassetti because it was his crime that caused the maid to be blamed and his crime that cause a mother to lose her daughters (one died and one to drugs) and a granddaughter. As i said, just my opinion. Ive watched this one and death on the nile many times and still love how they go.
I don’t know why but this seen breaks my heart, the music and emotion. I truly feel their pain lol
While I generally like the earlier film more overall, I come back to this one because of that scene. One of Michelle Pfeiffers best
That's probably just me but, if I were murdered, I wouldn't want my family to waste their lives hunting the person who killed me for revenge. They'd all have one life and I don't want them all to waste it all because of me. I would want them to grieve and move on
Lovely movie
At least Bouc is caring on Cassety, what a wonderful scene. BRILLANT!
The best part is that Bouc did not kill anybody on the Train. He is staying on Poirot side for all this time in the story!
but sadly he died on the nile@@BooBop1987
😭😭😭😭😭😭 one murder that destroys 12 soul
😢this scene 🎬 gets to me every time. 😢a group of family and friends who went through such lengths to avenge the deaths of a beautiful family😢.
This made me cry the first two time than the 3th time I dead ass started laughing because the way they look Stabbing him and the Camera angle but also the music got me
I know John committed suicide, and I know that the murder committed by the family and friends of the Armstrongs are still questionable, but there is no doubt that the love of the Armtrongs, their family, and friends for one another is the one of the strongest the world has ever had. I am sure that on account of their deeds for good, I am sure the Most High would understand for He is merciful, and also, in the first place if the courts in America (in Poirot's reality) resisted the temptation of bribary from Casseti and punished him accordingly, I am sure this murder on the Orient Express would not have happened. Those who murdered Casseti are not truly killers, they are just people who need a chance to heal.
They killed, fully aware of what they were doing. I don't believe the courts were bribed, I believe THEY believe that.
If you think about it, Count Andrenyi alone can cause those 12 stabs effectively as if it were by 12 people, this guy got Mother Russia Rage
Street justice y’all 👍
To make something so cruel so beautiful...Ehst a masterpiece!
It’s like the clue movie, one of the endings showed all of them as part of the murder
How dare you kill Jack sparrow?
Haha nice one ...
@@everyshortyouneed9489 😂😂
"YOU WILL REMEMBER THIS DAY AS THE DAY YOU ALMOST KILLED CAPTAIN JACK SPARROW"
*Captain Jack Sparrow
🤣
What I never understood was, in the book, instead of waking up Poirot with the fake cry, French voice behind Ratchet's door, Linda's "man-in-room" comment, and kimono woman (whoever that was in the story), why not just keep it simple and kill Ratchet without waking Poirot? Why bring his attention to anything at all? Also, why did MacQueen decide to speak in French instead of English behind Ratchet's door? That's kinda random to me.
It was all to throw the suspensions off them so that Poirot would believe that a random person came from off the train and killed Ratchet, now the speaking in French was actually a mistake on Mcqueens part because he forgot that Ratchet didnt speak French at all
@@sarahellynhahn1569 Oh, but he didn't have to speak French at all; why not English? And I get why they needed Poirot to think it was some stranger who killed Ratchett, but again, what if they just killed Ratchett without awakening Poirot at all, so he doesn't ever know Ratchet was killed, and pretend all is fine the next day, aside from teh snowdrift?
@@jakebastian6726 To set up a fake time of death and confuse Poirot they broke the watch so that would also help set a time of death and since the doctor was in on it he would also help set up a fake time of death and that way they would all have alibis that they could back up with one another
@@jakebastian6726 Also his voice would have been recognized if he spoke in english and Poirot would know it was Mcqueen not Ratchet who spoke behind the door
@@sarahellynhahn1569 I'm sorry---I think you've misunderstood me. I'll clarify thoroughly this time: wouldn't it have been better if the passengers just killed Ratchett without awakening Poirot? Like, make the illusion there is no murder at all, to ultimately eliminate their chances of being exposed? I'll break it down in steps to really clarify: step 1. _don't_ wake Poirot up and put on an act for him in the middle of the night. Step 2. go to Ratchet's room and kill him, while Poirot is asleep. Step 3. Leave no clues whatsoever--because Poirot isn't going to investigate if he _doesn't_ know Ratchet was killed. Step 4. continue your time on the train normally and nonchalantly, with only the snowdrift as the burden. After all, Poirot's not interrogating people, since there's no murder case to investigate (as far as he knows).
_That's_ what I meant by my question. Does that help you understand what I'm asking?
when johnny depp's character said someone wanted to kill him he wasn't wrong
The best detective movie others side Sherlock
Revenge is a dish best served cold
Is it just me or was it a coincidence that the Orient express derailed after the murder?
No it was a coincidence because pariot said that their plans changed after the avalanche
True, as per book also, two things changed their plan, piorot's unexpected arrival and derailing of express
I’m happy to say that I managed to solve it at the end after my dad who seen the movie before told me to redirect my attention to the fact that the body was stabbed so randomly
Same, my dad told me "how many time was he stabbed" and when I counted the suspect I understood
A much better reveal than the 74 version
Not to be that guy but if I am correct, Cassetti was never tried because he fled the country after the murder. Wouldn’t it have been better to alert the authorities of where he was?
Or arrange a kidnapping to bring him back to be prosecuted? Just saying, there was a way to get justice without living with the fact that they committed murder.
In the book he bribed the jury, but knew he would get killed if he stayed in America, hence why he left.
This movie is great, it’s just a shame they couldn’t have stuck to the novel more.. so many missed opportunities and flaws to make it more action that mystery
this is amber heard favourite movie
So this the trope I creep seeing where everyone is involved
Dr strange