What If the Universe had No Beginning?
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 05. 2023
- In this episode, we've embarked on an exciting journey into the heart of quantum cosmology, exploring Stephen Hawking's revolutionary "No-Boundary Proposal" and the fascinating debates it has incited. We've unravelled the concept of a "shuttlecock universe", pondered the wave function of the universe, and delved into the diverse theories shaping our understanding of cosmic origins.
- Věda a technologie
![Beyond the Observable Universe [4K]](/img/n.gif)
5.22 Holographic principle was proposed by Susskind, to explain the inconsistencies in Hawing's information paradox.
No it wasn't.
Nice Information Video
We are on the "drain" side of a black hole.
Then it would be very interesting how the universe crossed an infinite set of time sequentially.
The guy that works hard and figures out how to install plumbing that person was a genius. Genius is perspective, to assume Genius because of failure seems more like idiocy really. Failure isn't fatal or final, it's the ability to keep going that matters most. A great war time leader said something like that, who was he?
Complexity means it's wrong. Simple and Elegant solutions are usually the right ones.
Wrong.
That's what she said..
That hypothesis is impossible to prove. Occam's Razor suggests only that a "simple and elegant" explanation for an event is more LIKELY to be true than a complex explanation for that event. It offers no proof certain. While Occam's Razor is usually borne out by experience (and why I often rely upon it as a handy rule of thumb), it is not necessarily a fundamental law of physics. Atoms were long believed to be tiny, indivisible chunks of matter. but then subatomic particles were discovered. Later, it was found that such subatomic particles as protons and neutrons are comprised of even smaller fundamental particles. We currently have what is known as the Standard Model of particle physics that describes these particles nested within particles, but it is not necessarily perfect or complete. It is a work in progress. Complexity doesn't necessarily indicate error. Some things actually ARE more complex than they originally were thought to be.
THERE WAS NO BIG BANG.
Since science has only detected 5% of the known universe (and nothing of the unknown universe) it is a bit premature to be describing the entire elephant.
Read the Revelation of BAHA'U'LLAH and you would know the answers!
With the universe... No beginning = No present
Why ?
@@user-se2xm5yp6uIf there are an infinite number of causes then we will never get to today
e.g If someone wanted to shoot you with an arrow but to shoot they needed the go ahead (or permission) from another person who in turn needed the go ahead from another person etc etc infinitely, then the shot will never take place. Hence if the Universe is dependent on other things which are dependent on other things etc etc infinitely, then we will never get to today.
Still not answering the most important question
Nope, NO expansion. The properties are completely different. The same mistakes over and over. Cut it out.
Please expand.
@@jonafrica9460lol
😊😊😊😊⁰⁰⁰⁰0