I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
@Morpheus-X, well, the gentleman is a scholar, can't expect him to talk like the rude rogue host.. In the west, they thought they had won when they argue with twisted words, thus they ended up argue for the sake of arguements, not looking for improvement.
Good responses! For the last question, one could say EU set a target of 2% of GDP in military. US is way more than 2%. China? Well below 2%. In addition, your defense budget has something to do with the number of neighbors and their defence budget. China has the most land neighbors of the the world at 14.
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
Who's the USA to decide how everyone should rule their country, what they can and can't make, how much military can they have? Why is USA the God? And who's supervising the God (with the huge mess in his own backyard btw)?
The typical Anglo-Saxon mentality;- They think they are the inheritors of Rome and therefore they are the best, the only true empire and the only one who makes the rules. Typical hypocrites.
讚 ! 這才是真正的台灣之光 ! 我引以為榮 以身為中國人為榮 !
讚 ! 這才是真正的中國人之光 ! 臺灣人不就是中國人嗎？
@@tedwong8698在台湾你提“中华民国”前两个声音大了都会被817呛“喜欢中国滚回去”
自相矛盾！你要搞清楚你是中國人嗎？
@@Elfan97-ec1uk如果你把台灣換上海或北京其實是沒有問題的
@@tedwong8698 這有什麼好拉扯的？不能講台灣之光？奇怪了後面那句不就代表台灣人也是中國人，挑撥來的？現在的1450反向操作？製造對立嗎？？
「他們倒是想，就是沒錢」😂
杀人诛心😅
这句最妙！
这个印度裔的主持人心想：“你踏马真是说出来我们印度人的心声”！
@@kayapi5321😂😂😂😂你还别说，我真的没注意他是印度后裔
這句懟的人啞口無言啊！
主持人很無奈！😂😂😂
劉揚聲真英雄👍👍👍真漢子👍👍👍為中國說了公道話👍👍👍👍👍
👍！除了中國大陸14億人口支持你，還有更多深懷中華民族情懷的台灣人也支持你！
有骨气的中国人都应该支持他
同為台灣省民，也支持劉先生，更支持兩岸統一，台灣回歸祖國的那天早日到來！
真配服主持人可以練到不要臉的問那些問題，因為答案全是美國，卻來責問，不要臉天下無敵！
霉國 可以🤣🤣，中國就不可以？
真是世界笑話
感覺他是我們的同志，故意問這些可以讓嘉賓回抽美帝的問題😂
因为美国人的思维真的和我们不一样，他们认为中国就该乖乖听话永远不反抗
主持人應該是真心認同🙈
@@jaujausmith1259 是的，价值观根本不一样，美国人没同理心和换位思考的习惯
这才是真正的台湾同胞~中华民族的好男儿👍
他年少時移居美國，身為異族有不一樣體驗，亦避開了台灣本土的政府思想洗禮，才有格外透徹的思維。
@@jaujausmith1259 说到底还是骨子里认同自己是一个中国人，年少移居美国的人很多，不是每个人都有这份魄力回国的。好比台积电的张忠谋，还有同样是台湾从小移民美国的黄仁勋
他是中國人！他是我們中國的同胞！
@@jaujausmith1259 在美國，也非常容易被美國媒體洗腦。可能他的朋友在大學時被美國人打死和常被美國人欺負，令他不喜歡美國。我也是少年移居美國，不過從第一天就不喜歡美國，英文也不好，所以沒被美國洗腦。
他有选择，但他依然选择做中国人，这才是真中国人，是打心眼里对中国文化的认同。
堂堂正正勇敢的中國人👍👍👍💪💪💪💐🍎🍊
劉先生真令人敬佩。
這位主持人真是不知羞。
這位主持人真不是不知羞恥，而是種族滅絕也。
刘先生所说有理有据，态度不卑不亢，充分展示了中国男性的智慧和魅力。主持人一副咄咄逼人，自以为是的挑衅姿态，可言语空洞，头脑空空，他需要明白“有理不在声高”，不过他很可能傲慢惯了，以为他就是“理”。
主持人也挺令人尊敬的，為了養家活兒，承受了凡人承受不了的無恥任務
入门条件就是不知羞耻
尾角人不要臉，天下無敵。世界祗有美麗角對，認為其他的都不人。🙄
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈！最後一句讓主持人頓時失語，台下也響起輕快的笑聲！
我雖生長在台灣，但我以身為中國人為榮。令人尊敬的劉揚聲先生!
忍辱负重，以柔克刚，刚柔并济，愚公移山，天行健君子以自强不息.....中国5000年文明留给后人的精神财富。
我也生活在外國，我也以中國人為榮
@@wongcna 在国外反而容易体会到，因为在外国人眼里华人都是一个样子．．．
我佩服劉揚聲先生，他放棄中華民國國籍才加入中華人民共和國，但在台灣有些人死不放中華民國國籍，卻高喊自己是中華人民共和國的中國人，這種人叫做噁心跟叛國賊。
這就是妥妥的美式雙標，我可以加軍費但你不行，在質問別人之前為什麼不先看看自己國家都做了些什麼？！
是啊，美国人口比中国少的多，他们怎么自己不问自己为啥要在全球上百个军事基地呢
回得太解氣了，來自中國台北的點讚👍👍👍🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
+1
+++++++++1
+999999999 👍
谢谢🎉
看这段自然想看访谈的全部。可惜这个视频没有提供原视频链接。觉得应该提供。想看原版访谈的请贝下面链接。看了原视频也就知道为什么只剪切了原视频的一小段。
有個馬來西亞人：向劉楊聲敬禮致敬🫡🙏👍👏😻🌹這種充滿正能量的聲音足以懟得他們啞口無言也讓在場的所有人看到了正義與邪惡🙏🙏🙏🫵👊🤨🌹
这记者问话恶心透顶！真的想抽他！
儍瓜永不放棄都永遠對
劉Sir懟得太有理有據 又解氣👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👍👍👍
来自大马海外华裔，🐰年！不🐰不快，实话实说，谢谢你！刘扬声，说的对，怼得好！真不愧是最棒的正义发声👏👏👏 字字诛心，句句入理，慷慨激昂，铿锵有力，每一语都极具杀伤力，切中要害，道出事实的真相，继续加油！我们都支持你，毕竟我们都是同根生，欢迎回归到祖国🇨🇳的怀怉，为国效力，为你点赞👍支持。
歡迎移民祖國
那你快点移民去中国
你们这些反贼走狗也赶快移民僵尸国阿美利坚共和国吧😂😂😂
我们想。。。但是我的社会关系。。。
@@toosmall4674 Nike！！！
講得非常好同胞👍👍👍☺️
劉生說得好！👍👍👍🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
以前沒有人敢懟美國，那是因為美國太強大其他國太弱小了，說不上話，一個不小心還可能被美國揍！現在好了，中國強大了，當然要主持正義囉！否則讓美國繼續囂張跋扈，那這世上還有公道嗎？ 劉先生句句針對，懟得好啊！👍👍👍👍👍
意外發現 劉揚聲先生 就是YT 時事節目的主持! 看完了這視頻 對劉先生多了一份的認識 多了一份的敬意! 你是中國人的驕傲!❤❤💯💯👏👏
劉先生你嬴得了我對你的尊敬 !
為劉揚聲先生點贊👍👍👍
🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
主持人的問題是事先精心設計的，而劉的回答卻是臨塲的。為劉揚聲點贊👍
😂现在设计不了😂欧美民主就是个笑话。
我就听到一句最真实的 欧美没有民主自由 只有
压迫 这个词最贴切
可也设计得不怎么样😅
👍👍👍👍回答太厲害, 句句反擊, 有節有理！
劉揚聲👍👍👍👏👏👏💖💖
說的真好！這真的是聰明的台灣人，台灣之光也是中國之光！
应该反问那位印度裔的米国主持人，为什么米国的军费比后面8个军事强国的军费总和还要多，而且军费占GDP的比重高达4%，而中国军费占GDP的比重不到2%。
他是英国的，而且应该是巴基斯坦裔
@@coninseres4541啊仨有智障，理解能力低🤭
美鬼控制西方所有媒体。
按自己國家收支來計算。
Oh #CCPchowchow, come boy
令身為中國香港人的我！對劉聲揚先生致敬！～👍👍👍
一個看透了的真中国人👍👍
中國俄羅斯英國加法國，軍費支出加起來也沒有美國的多，美國還真是不要臉
讚👍！引西方深思的對話。
經過多年的洗腦 恐怕西方人已不能獨立思考了
要西方深思，你必须要有让他坐回板凳上的力量。
@@tempCCC沒錯，所以之前楊潔篪在中美會談中那一番底氣十足的硬話正是基於今日的中國已經有了足以將西方按在板凳上好好聽話的力量！👍
身為臺灣人居然都不知道有劉揚聲先生這號人物，引以為榮！
听不懂英文还看不懂繁体字幕？他是个中国人 所以你得是个中国人才有资格以他为荣 不然对他来说是种羞辱
有必要特別關心鄰國人士嗎🤣
@@wongeric2276讲真，大陆人都没1450这么关心大陆，你们辛苦了😢
@@wongeric2276为什么台湾1450最关心中国人的事？台湾自己事都没那么关心吧
@@noob2569 哥，台灣人就是中國人，我當然以身為中國人為榮。
只要有理有據，從容應對，壓倒憑大聲咄咄逼人的提問者是易如反掌。
致敬劉先生👍👍👍
刘扬声先生是我马来西亚老牛非常尊敬的老师之一，我衷心地祝福刘老师身体健康吉祥如意，阿弥陀佛!🙏😊❤
He should challenge the host why the military expense that the USA spends on is even more than the total amount of the other top 9 nations.
The host's answer will be : USA' s budget is an offend budget, not a defend budget.
@@eddychan2112谁能保证中国不被美国进攻呢😂
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
@Morpheus-X, well, the gentleman is a scholar, can't expect him to talk like the rude rogue host..
In the west, they thought they had won when they argue with twisted words, thus they ended up argue for the sake of arguements, not looking for improvement.
@@boonchongsim8926 And if being too aggressive then they call you war-wolf, lol. Shameless and pity.
我的天! 听一遍, 听十遍, 听一百遍都是远远不够的! 这这都不是提前排练好的嘛? 太厉害了!
希望有更多正義人士為中國發聲，講出良心說話。
不卑不亢，論述正確👍。
勁！😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂答的十分十分非常非常好呀❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤說到心坎裡😂支持
劉揚聲的反擊刀刀見骨 !為你點~~讚 !
支持刘洋先生
👏👏👏刘先生回答棒及了，第一问题就已经在打脸米国的种族歧视，假民主，第三个军费问题更加棒棒哒👍👍👍❤❤❤
一个个想当然的假设,巅倒是非的问题,引来了真理的正确回应！👍👍👍
劉揚聲，好樣的！有骨氣。
刘先生最后的一句话，和那犀利的眼神，轻蔑一笑，大家的哄堂大笑让对方无地自容。自取其辱😂
劉揚聲有急才，有智慧。
印度佬都想就是沒錢, 這句最精警
請問有整段的訪問嗎 真是回得太精彩了
什麼都想做，但無錢什麼都做不到。🤣
就是要有這樣的人 多多支持
这个人好聪明呀，每个回答都直中要害！
太给力了，我们需要更多这样的中国人，敬佩敬仰
Good responses! For the last question, one could say EU set a target of 2% of GDP in military. US is way more than 2%. China? Well below 2%. In addition, your defense budget has something to do with the number of neighbors and their defence budget. China has the most land neighbors of the the world at 14.
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
醜國總是惡人先告狀，做賊喊捉賊，超噁心🤮🤮🤮
He is awesome!
劉先生蠻屌的 剛關注他頭條😊
力挺刘先生，回答完美！
有句话可能有些台湾同胞不太爱听，但事实上无论你是大陆人还是台湾人，在外国眼里都算华人，所以中国越来越强大，对华人整体至少不是一件坏事，靠别国帮助毕竟不如靠自己发展。
中肯，在美華人的地位連被歧視的黑人都還不如
@@sy3761就是被压迫啊，谈什么民主自由天天，全世界烧杀抢
华人在外被歧视 有一部分是呆蛙的功劳
我佩服劉揚聲先生，他放棄中華民國國籍才加入中華人民共和國，但在台灣有些人死不放中華民國國籍，卻高喊自己是中華人民共和國的中國人，這種人叫做噁心跟叛國賊。
大部分台灣人反感的都是後者這種人，你想加入哪國台灣人根本不會管你。
的確是事實
老美多少軍費？DLLM，中國是愛好和平的國家，對於霸權的惡行，祖國不得不武裝到牙齿
老美很混蛋沒錯
但要說老共愛好和平？
@@Daifeehan 老共不爱好和平？举个例子主动侵略过那个国家？爱好和平是对外努力不使用暴力，但不是打不还手骂不还口，“人不犯我我不犯人，人要犯我我必犯人”
他是台湾人，他是台湾之光，一个堂堂正正的中国人。
講得好😘😘😘
最尾句說話，一針見血😂
經典，印度他們不是不想增加軍費而是他們沒錢。
最後一句回的真好、讓台下一片笑聲。
大赞刘扬声先生，您是中国人的骄傲！向您致敬！
劉先生說的又對又好,我寄望有更多像劉先生的視頻讓更多人了解真相和知道真相.
只准美國有超過10艘航母 6000顆核彈 全球無數軍事基地?中國目前軍事預算 何時能追上美國目前軍事裝備的一半?更別說核彈頭
This narrator is the typical Anglo Saxon media representative who sees no sin in himself and crime committed in the last hundred years. Shame on them.
and the funniest is he ain't even a white! YET thinks he's one!🤣🤣🤣🤣
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
Bravo. Wonderful response 👏👏👏
劉哥，太棒了！ 加油！
Smartest, brilliant response to those arrogant, hypocrite western, 👏👏👏
The host isn't even a "westerner" but brainwashed with western propaganda narratives & talking point. Those are the worse kind lol
I watched the whole head to head show they posted on their main website. And this speaker & the other Chinese representative did so poorly it got my blood boiled. In fact the video only cut the 2 minutes-ish segment out of the full 49 minutes plus that he did okay with. He was constantly attacked by all the US led 5 eyes propaganda narratives & make up talking points & he couldn't even addressed them properly at all whatsoever. The main problem is he thought he is going there for an intellectual, fair & friendly discussion, when instead it was merely a well prepared anti China propaganda show with the narrative of China is evil Q&A in which he didn't know how to combat it. Also it was very interesting/odd that part about his past was only introduced at the very end of the show instead of the beginning. If the show was genuine they would have put such introduction at the beginning to establish the speaker creditability.
劉揚聲先生好嘢
i want to see the full interview.
👋👋👋👋👋👋well said.....劉揚聲
看美國被嗆很爽。現在也只有中國有實力與底氣嗆美國
因为刘先生深知：只有团结的中国🇨🇳人才能实现中华复兴。当然西方也非常乐见一盘散沙的全球华人。
Who's the USA to decide how everyone should rule their country, what they can and can't make, how much military can they have? Why is USA the God? And who's supervising the God (with the huge mess in his own backyard btw)?
The typical Anglo-Saxon mentality;- They think they are the inheritors of Rome and therefore they are the best, the only true empire and the only one who makes the rules. Typical hypocrites.
主持人的嘴臉真噁心
回應得非常貼切！太棒了👏
刘先生的淡定把那厮急得。喜欢!
講得好 講得好🎉
大贊❤佩服，就是要用他們的語言去反駁西方記者們！
Charles Liu is a superior man, and so is Eric Li.
讚👍 鏗鏘有力
沒看過這麼沒水準的主持人
講話比來賓更大聲 還咄咄逼人
好正的對答
牛逼！过瘾！
為何 霉國 可以🤣🤣，中國就不可以？
真是世界笑話
太棒了，尤其最後一句問話堵死對方，完勝，中國人就是要自強才能護已助弱，又是一個令敬佩的能人。。
美国军费不是更高😂
來自中國台灣省宜蘭縣的讚!!👍👍👍
+1台中
同為台灣省民，座標新竹，同為劉先生這一席話點讚 +999 👍
你可以先選擇跟他一樣放棄中華民國國籍加入中共國，而不是在網路上喊喊而已。
@@yahuilin2834 兩岸統一是遲早的事，今天的中華民國如果不積極推動兩岸統一只想偏安一隅苟且拖延逃避現實，那最後的下場也就是等著被中華人民共和國統一的份，妳如果不想當妳口中所謂的中共國國民，太平洋沒加蓋，妳也可以選擇去加入妳的美國日本，反正當解放軍登島之日到來，我們島內中國人必定共襄盛舉，簞食壺漿以迎王師！
@@CXWu009 你拿著中華民國身份講這種話就是叛國賊，中共國一定也不會善待你們這種會背叛國家的人
对待恶人就应该同样的恶脸回应!
这个家伙是不知道美国的军费吗？美国一个国家就是排名前9的国家军事预算的总额还多
以為劉先生會這樣回懟
这个反问并不好，他会说因为美国是世界的领袖，需要花这么多军费维持世界秩序。
中国的军费取决于中国感受受威胁的程度，这句话是挑不出毛病的。属于基本自卫权。
@@zen-mc4ju 说挑不出毛病是你知识储备不够，美国这个世界领袖谁定的?
@@qiwang3857 现场的观众认知就是这样，辩论不是为了探寻真理，那是在实验室里做的工作。在辩论场只有是非对错的认知。这是一种非常主观的认知形态。所以，你并不懂辩论技巧。
或者换一个场景，比如说在中国的某个大学的公开辩论，还是同样的主持人，换了一批观众，你认为主持人还做同样的事吗？那观众会怎么看待这个主持人？
Well said 👏👏👏👍
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏！中華民族的驕傲👍👍
怼得好👊💪💪💪
多謝劉先生!
The thing most feared by the US is to look at itself in the mirror.
越來越看不起這種外國人的咀臉！
西方世界的自信已經掉進糞坑裡了😂😂😂
刘先生答得巧妙风趣 主持人也很风度没有打断.