Power struggle in BRICS: What’s happening?
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 06. 2024
- Welcome to the high-stakes world of BRICS 2024, where economic titans clash in a game of geopolitical chess. With 30% of the global GDP at play, is India a true contender or merely a pawn being manipulated by China and Russia?
In this explosive analysis, we unravel the tangled threads of India's role in BRICS, revealing hidden agendas and power plays that could shape the future of global power dynamics. Discover how India's strategy of 'multi-alignment' aims to navigate this geopolitical minefield and what it means for the balance of power.
Join us as we dive deep into the diplomatic tensions, strategic maneuvers, and potential outcomes of the BRICS Summit 2024. Will India emerge as a key player, or will it remain in the shadow of its more powerful partners?
Watch now to find out, and don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more in-depth geopolitical insights. The game is afoot, and India's next move could change everything.
OUTLINE:
00:00:00 - Introduction to BRICS and India's Role
00:00:41 - Historical Context of BRICS
00:01:12 - India's Economic Position and Challenges
00:01:51 - Geopolitical Dynamics within BRICS
00:02:32 - India's Strategic Balancing and Alliances
00:03:09 - India's Strategy and Influence in BRICS
00:03:58 - Future Prospects and Challenges for India in BRICS
00:05:27 - Conclusion and Audience Engagement
*************************************************************************
Welcome to Future Forward: Your Guide to a Changing World
This channel is your compass for navigating the intersection of technology, global trends, and societal shifts. We explore how these forces are reshaping our lives, industries, and the very fabric of our world.
🚀 Why Watch & Listen?
Gain Clarity: Break down complex topics like AI, geopolitics, and economic trends into understandable insights.
Prepare for Tomorrow: Discover strategies for financial security, mental well-being, and resilience in uncertain times.
Empower Yourself: Learn how to adapt, make informed decisions, and take control of your future.
Join the Conversation: Engage with a community of curious minds who are passionate about understanding and shaping the future.
*Important Note*
This video was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The research process involved using AI-powered analysis and fact-checking to ensure accuracy. The video itself was generated using InvideoAI, which incorporates licensed stock footage and royalty-free music. The narration is either a cloned voice of James Brauer (the channel's author) or an AI-generated voice. While AI plays a significant role in the production process, the content presented is intended to be informative and accurate.
Want to create your own faceless AI video with InVideo? Click here --- invideo.sjv.io/c/2670824/8836...
Disclaimer:
The information provided in this video is intended for general knowledge and informational purposes only. It should not be considered a substitute for professional advice. Always consult with a qualified expert or professional before making any decisions based on the information presented in this video.
(Note: Links included in the description may be affiliate links, meaning I may earn a small commission if you make a purchase.) - Zábava
Indians are defeated by the Chinese in the 1962 war. It was the most humiliating defeat in history if you were to examine all the facts that were involved in the war. This is the ultimate proof that war tactics/strategy/determination/will power/bravery triumphs over superior weapons/technology/cowardice.
1) The Chinese were having the "great Chinese famine" from 1658 to 1962. China was too weak to defend itself.
2) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis".
3) The Sino-Soviet split from 1960 - 1962. China had nothing. No weapons, guns, artillery supplies from either Western and Soviet and no food (serious famine).
4) Despite all these advantages, India lost.
5) There are no excuses for such a humiliating defeat. That is why India is so desperate to have the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report of the 1962 war" concealed forever and also to hide which country is the true aggressor of the war. When it was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement.
During the "Rising Bharat Summit 2024" of March 2024 , Palki Sharma asked the esteemed and scholarly geopolitical scientist, Prof John Mearsheimer, 2 questions about geopolitics.
➡Palki Sharma asked: Is today a Uni-Polar World or a Multi-Polar World?
▶Prof John Mearsheimer replied: Only USA, Russia and CHINA are the 3 major GREAT power.
➡Unsatisfied with the answer given by Prof John Mearsheimer, Palki Sharma asked again: What about |ndia saar?🤭
▶Prof John Mearsheimer replied: |ndia does not qualifies to be a GREAT power.
🔀Palki Sharma's reacted: 😡😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬😭😭😭😭😭😭
🔀Entire world reacted: When Bo||ywood propagandas/scams meet Reality.
This is too superficial. The issues and dynamics are much more complicated.
India has FAR too many domestic issues and problems that need to be solved before it's going to be respected as a leader on the global stage and in the a Global South.
In the past election the people spoke to Modi by removing significant support saying they are not happy with his policies, with no improvements in the quality of their lives under his leadership. In fact it’s getting worse.
India's “straddling” between the West and East has not benefitted them other than now they are recognized as siding with the West on militarizing the region to support Western encirclement of China and there is a lack of trust in India within BRICS.
India's relationship with the U.S. is like an abusive marriage.
In a joint statement with the U.S. when Modi was visiting, India supported the U.S. unwritten rules based order which conflicts with the United Nations legal world order and supported by the Global South.
The U.S. forces players to take sides. NOW, the Global Majority is the future for the world’s economy and growth throughout the rest of this century and beyond.
India has never been a team player, taking but giving nothing back to the world.
If India keeps hedging its bets, they could find themselves on the outside looking in.
lol china is not a superpower.. it cant even capture a tiny island, taiwan which is just a few km from it.. plus its economy is based on exporting low tech goods to the west using chinese sweatshop & slave labor..
@@joeblodontchno5309 That's a very low intellect comment.
▶Summary of the "Rising Bharat Summit 2024"◀
According to Professor John Mearsheimer,
USA superpower? ✔
Russia superpower? ✔
China superpower? ✔
India superpower? ❌
🤭🤣
THAT'S HOW THE HISSING, SPITTING AND BACKBITING COBRA TREATS FRIENDS. THEIR JEALOUSY, ENVY AND HATRED KNOWS NO BOUNDS
you have described typical chinese
@@joeblodontchno5309 Nah, the Indians.
@@ShitSkinsIndian
Bravo💯👏👌👍✌️
The only thing 'great' about India is it's massive population of 1.4 billion. economically, it is a third world nation whose gdp per capita is similar to Bangladesh and Congo. militarily, it is not in the same class as Russia or China.
But they have already claimed they're a global super power in 2020.
During the G20 summit in India, India foreign minister also claimed they are the voice of the global south.
India's aim with BRICS is to get more voice and power at IMF, WTO and other western dominated organizations for more growth. Is it wrong?
The PER CAPITA GDP of incredible! superpower! india! IS equivalent to that of nations of Sub Saharan Africa.
lol both china & russia are 3rd world countries who are slipping into the 4th world
@@hengongchua6250 lol china is not a superpower.. it cant even capture a tiny island, taiwan which is just a few km from it.. plus its economy is based on exporting low tech goods to the west using chinese sweatshop & slave labor..
In the Mumbai slums, slum dwellers share the same neighborhood with India’s and Asia's richest man, Mukesh Ambani. Despite being so rich, he did little to help his countrymen, especially those that live just across his mansion. There is an |ndian saying that says "the life of a cow is more valuable than a Dalit/slum dweller." 🤭🤣😂
Real story. A company, XYZ (I won't name the company), used to be a multi racial company or MNC. One day, because of geopolitics or whatever, the CEO of the company (non-Indian) steps down and appointed an Indian to be the new CEO. The first thing that the Indian CEO did after that was to "restructure" the company by appointing a new HR manager of Indian ancestry. A few years later, all non-Indian employees were either mysteriously fired or told to leave and so on. The company became a 100% Indian company from then on. This is how they swallow up your company, please beware and aware of such practices. If you're wondering why this example is relevant, think of this example as an Indian corporate practice when managing a company. If Indian becomes president, imagine what he will do to your country's Immigration department.
Why is the financial/technological news always about USA and China but little to nothing about India? How do India stay relevant in the Global financial/technological news? By making some videos that are predictions of the distant future such as
1) How India WILL BE the global superpower by year 2047?
2) How India COULD be the global superpower by year (insert year)?
3) India a "POTENTIAL" superpower by year (insert year)?
4) CAN India be a Global superpower? or
5) India WILL BECOME a global superpower by year (insert year)?
6) WILL India surpassed China/USA?
and so on? "Will be/ Could be/ Potential / Can / Will become / Will surpassed"? All these words are "predictions of the future"? Is this how they cope? Are they repetitive spams or are they real financial/technological news? Obviously, they don't even qualify as news let alone financial/technological news. This is how they stay relevant in the financial/technological news? Will they ever learn their lessons? Remember "Know Your Meme: India superpower by 2020"?
The Indian EGO. When Bollywood meets reality.
Bollywood:
What are the facts here?
1) India said that they will be superpower by 2020 or earlier in year 1998 (Do some research on this meme "India superpower by 2020" Edit: In 1998, former president of India Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam and Dr Y. S. Rajan co-authored India 2020: A Vision for the New Millennium, a book in which they expressed their vision for India becoming a developed country by year 2020 or earlier.
2) Modi said that India is the voice/leader of the global south at the G20 Summit. Source: 6 Sept 2023, NEW DELHI (AP), Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi says his country is “becoming the voice of the Global South,”. India also hosted the first ever ""Voice of the Global South Summit 2023".
3) Modi said in the Gujarat rally after BJP’s Lok Sabha win in year 2019, Modi: India a Vishwaguru (global teacher of the entire world)
4) Year 2024:
Speaking at News18’s “Rising Bharat Summit” in New Delhi 2024, PM Modi said that the world believes that the 21st century belongs to India and is confident about a “rising Bharat”.
Year 2014:
Election-winner Narendra Modi: 21st century belongs to India
Year 2015:
San Jose, 28th September 2015, Modi said "the 21st century belonged to India".
5) Modi: "India has become a space superpower"
6) Modi at BRICS Summit: “India is today the fastest growing major economy in the world" (Economic Times with article: India to soon become USD 5 trillion economy, says PM Modi at BRICS Summit)
7) Top quotes from Modi in the Saharanpur rally: We made India the 5th largest economic superpower in the world in the last 10 years.
Reality:
1)
No astronauts in space.
No space station.
No space rovers on Mars.
No functioning space rovers on Moon.
No lunar samples extracted from Moon and sent back to Earth.
No ISS membership.
2)
Year 1998 |ndia's GDP = 421.35 billion
Year 1998 China's GDP = 1.03 trillion
China's economy is 2 times plus of |ndia.
Year 2022 |ndia's GDP = 3.42 trillion
Year 2022 China's GDP = 17.96 trillion
Source: World Bank GDP by countries.
China's economy is 5 times plus of |ndia.
World's fastest growing economy indeed? 🤔
3)
GDP capita of India = < 3K USD
GDP capita of China = > 12K USD.
No UNSC Veto powers.
Have you ever wondered why India itself, never have a single common language/culture/heritage that are spoken/written/understood/shared by all Indians other than the English language? Why? 🔀Because India is a made-up country that only came into existence by the militarily annexation of every single sovereign country and Princely states in the subcontinent itself. 🔙English language as the common language of India do not count obviously, because it is the colonial language. India do not exist prior to British India and before 1947.
Year of annexation, followed by annexed territory/country.
1947 Free Kashmir from India.
1948 Free Hyderabad from India
1948 Free Junagadh from India.
1949 Free Manipur from India.
1949 Free Tripura from India.
1951 Free South Tibet from India.
1951 Free Nagaland from India.
1961 Free Goa from India.
1962 Free Kalapani from India.
1971 Free Turtuk from India.
1972 Free Tin Bigha from India.
1975 Free Sikkim from India.
2006 Free Duars from India.
2013 Free Moreh from India.
Extremely biased video. Thumbnail puts Modi in front when India is the least significant economic power among the 3. When I refer to economic power, I refer to GDP and natural resources. Russia is the biggest country by landmass and by natural resources, they are among the top. China is largest manufacturing powerhouse contributing to 15% of the total global export (UN data) and is 2nd in nominal GDP in terms of USD. India is the least significant among the 3. In addition to that, this video is focusing too much on India as if they are the "protagonist" of the video/movie. 🤭
There were 565 Princely States in 1946.What Nehru inherited from the colonial masters was only 1/3 the size of modern |ndia, which was basically Uttar Pradesh-Haryana-Bihar, which have a lot of people. He also inherited the colonial army and navy. With army and navy in hand, Nehru coerced all the princely states to join his empire. In July 1946, he warned that no princely state could militarily withstand the army of an independent India. By January 1947, Nehru clearly stated that the concept of the divine right of kings would not be accepted in independent India. Further escalating his approach, in May 1947, Nehru declared that any princely state refusing to join the Constituent Assembly of India would be treated as an enemy state.....That's why India is so prickly about sovereignty and having its claims challenged. If they don't keep a lid on things, their empire could collapse.
The altitude of the Indian people changed after they themselves were in the driving seat. For example, British historian Arnold Toynbee remarked that the Indians when they were the subjects of the British crown couldn't care less on British India's frontier and may even consider what the British coveting of faraway land as immoral. The 1921 India's Congress Party even urge the neighboring states to refrain from entering into any treaty with the Imperial Power. But after 1947 Indian suddenly regard all these faraway land as sacred Indian territory. Here is Arnold Toynbee's words:
"It is queer that lines drawn by British officials should have been consecrated as precious national assets of the British Indian Empire's non-British successor states. At the time when those lines were drawn the transaction produced no stir among the . . . Indian . . . subjects, as they then were, of the British crown. If any of them paid any attention to what Durand and McMahon were doing, they will have written it off as just another move in the immoral game of power politics
that the British Imperialists were playing at the Indian tax-payers' expense. The present consecration of these British-made lines as heirlooms in the successor states' national heritages is an unexpected and unfortunate turn of History's wheel."
@@PomegranateChocolate Wow, that's a very insighful comment. I am going save it for future use if you don't mind. Thank you.😊
@@ShitSkinsIndian My pleasure 😊. I read all your comments and learn something new about it. I also put together a timeline on how South Tibet became Arunachal Pradesh in my other comment. Please take a look at that. Thanks. 😊
@@PomegranateChocolate Yes, I saw that. I have saved it for future use. Thank you. 😊
How much money did the Permanent 5 UNSC members contributed to UNSC Peacekeeping budget?
United States (27.89% of total budget)💪P5
China (15.21% of total budget)💪P5
United Kingdom (5.79% of total budget)💪P5
France (5.61% of total budget)💪P5
Russian Federation (3.04% of total budget)💪P5
SuperPower |ndia (0.1668% of total budget) 🤭🤡
*Source: United Nations Peacekeeping (How we are funded)*
|ndians on all social medias:
We deserve to be a permanent UNSC member saar
We are one of the largest contributors to UNSC saar (🚩this is a scam made by |ndians)
We want equal veto rights saar
UN/UNSC is useless/redundant saar
Bollywood's Productions at Francis Scott Key Bridge:
1) Bollywood's Company (Synergy Marine Group)
2) Bollywood's CEO (Capt. Rajesh Unni)
3) Bollywood's Founder (Capt. Rajesh Unni)
4) Bollywood's captain/pilots (Indian nationals)
5) Bollywood's crew (Indian nationals)
6) Bollywood's employees (Indian nationals)
7) Bollywood's ship (controlled, not necessarily owned)
8) Bollywood's management team (Indian nationals)
9) Bollywood's disaster (Baltimore Bridge collapse)
|ndians and |ndia like to claim that they invented everything and everything originated from because they claimed that they are the "Vishvaguru", the GLOBAL TEACHER, of the entire world.🤭
|ndia has been begging for a UNSC permanent seat since year 1994 on every UNSC meetings, 30+ years in the making and each time she has been rejected. When will |ndia learn self-respect and shame? 🤭
Source: JSTOR
Title of article: INDIA'S PERMANENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE U. N. SECURITY COUNCIL : CHANGING POWER REALITIES AND NOTIONS OF SECURITY
Author: Manoj Kumar Mishra (Indian)
What article said specifically: India has been bidding for the permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council since 1994 when India made its intention clear in the General Assembly that it was prepared to bear the responsibility of the permanent membership of the Security Council.
|ndia is the only country whereby animals are treated as gods (Hanuman / Karni Mata / Ganesha/ Varaha etc.) and humans treated as animals eg. Dalits/Untouchables of the Hindu caste system/women's modesty. 🤭
It's too early to say that India is going to be a shadow to the other players. I want to see other countries like south east Asia (Malaysia , Singapore etc) and Mexico joining the Brics
Do you know that R at meat is considered a delicacy in Bihar, |ndia? The Musahar people of India did this pretty well. Palki Sharma (before she undergoes some skin whitening treatment) once reported it in a video saved in my playlist. 🤭😂🤣
Do you know that cowidungihotpot and cowidungihotbath is considered a delicacy and traditional practice in |ndia?😋
For those who are interested:
*Indian source:* Times of India
*Title of article/research/report:* Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open.
*What article said specifically:* India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open
*Title of article/research/report:*
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
*Global Source:*
UNICEF
*What article said specifically:*
India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
Maybe BRICS bloc can help prioritize human conditions for members? Or, are they only anti-American or anti-west as their top priority?
@@TheFutureForwardChannel Thank you for replying and showing interest in my comments. Open defecation is their culture, there is no other way around it. India, prioritized vanity projects such as their space programs in the 1960s, OVER their toilet program, Swachh Bharat Mission, in year 2014. Conclusion: Space programs are more important than toilets.
@@TheFutureForwardChannel What makes you think the BRICS are anti-American or anti-West?
India have practically zero influence in BRICS. When China wanted BRICS expansion from the original 5, India said NO. What happened later?🤭
You just said the quiet part out loud LoL
Well I personally think that has to do with Pakistan joining the club China is not interested in country disputes.. your family and get along simple meaning get rid of your American policy idiolligy and work it out for the better of the future
@@sinic1978 🤭
@@richardleenders8243 That could be it but BRICS's expansion would mean dilution of power from the original 5. It is just like the prestigious UNSC permanent membership. The more you add in, the less prestigious it becomes. At the end of the day, it's all about the Indian ego. Let me explain.
@@richardleenders8243 |ndia is crying because she was denied an UNSC permanent membership over and over again despite begging for it since 1994. |ndia's Bollywood scripts may have changed over time, but intellectuals can see through the ploy of |ndia. |ndia's motive for an UNSC reform was never about peace or equity. It was all about satisfying the |ndian ego/jealousy and their inferiority comp|ex: If |ndia can't have a permanent UNSC permanent seat, all other countries shall not have it either. Thus, the |ndians are pushing this agenda, the "need" for an UNSC reform, on all social medias.
The record speaks for itself ! Look at the leadership record among the 3 obvious "leaders of Presidents Xi and Putin plus that of Modi; and tell me what are the personality differences of each leader. (1) Putin , in anyway you wish to call it, "saved Russia from the contrived destruction brought about be American & allies and the naivete of Boris Yeltsin. (2) The world can see the man of history and vision in President Xi; just need to mention Xi's Belt & Road initiatives; never in the history of mankind has a vision so beneficial to man that has ever been conceived and so ably realized by man. Modi's leadership is conceived on the foundation of man's weakest characteristics, "RACISM & RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY " and an outstanding example of similar style of the assumption of such leadership qualities is former PM of Malaysia, Mahatir Mohd. (also another Indian leader, who changed his race from Indian to become Malay). Their leadership is not achieved by merit but by exploiting the emotions of the people. Leadership of a group is based on the highest and biggest contributions of the leaders; what has Modi achieved for India except for so many pogroms perpetrated on the Muslim citizens of his nation ? Is this a true leader ? How can India lead BRICS when his objection for increasing BRICS membership was OVER-RULED by other leaders of the organization ? None of Modi's proposal gained support. THE MOST OBVIOUS MOVE FOR INDIA IS TO LEAVE THE MEMBERSHIP OF BRICS AND JOIN THE G7.
India is exporting their unemployment problems and their unemployed "economic refugees" in millions to every part of the world, thereby, creating unemployment problems for the native people in host countries. As a result, many of the locals/natives became jobless and/or homeless.
BRICKS as an economic organisation has nothing to do with geo-political influence which has more to do with economic prowess and military strength. India is not expected to play a very big part in BRICKS because its economy is small.
India will stay in BRICS, but as indicted, will be increasingly sidelined. That's inevitable.
The global south and ASEAN will orient to China without any consideration about India.
India is and has a right to be proud of it's achievements, but it's still very, very far behind China.
So many countries are benefitting from massive China infrastructure support. India doesn't do anything materially except make friends.
When basic hygiene and sanitation has to be taught in the 21st century......
Title of article: *India has highest incidence of diarrhoeal deaths: Study*
Source: *Times of India*
What article said specifically: The World Health Organization estimates that between 90,000 and 153,000 children die from rotavirus infection in India each year. According to the WHO, more than 2.3 million children below five years of age die in India annually. Of these, about 334,000 die from diarrhoea-related diseases.
India invaded China in 1962 through Nehru's forward policy when China was having a massive famine from 1958 to 1962 and during the Sino-Soviet split from 1960 to 1962. It was a once in a lifetime opportunity that India would never miss to grab more land from a weakened China. When India gets beaten up and lost the war that they had started despite all these advantages, not to mentioned military supplies from Israel and USA (Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis"), she cried to the entire world and plays the victim. Till now, India never dares to disclose the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report on the 1962 war" even after 60+ years. And when the report was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement. You have to got to wonder why🤔🤥😏🥱A nation without integrity and honesty and a spawning ground for all the scam callers has no credibility on the Global Stage😏.
Wow India invaded china in 1962 check the history
@@axelblaze8789
india the vicious backstabber in South Asia.
@@axelblaze8789 Learn what is Nehru's forward policy.
@@axelblaze8789 Yeah, China invaded India when they have a massive famine and when they have no support from the Soviets after the Sino-Soviet split( not an amicable split). Common sense. India forces China to retaliate.
@@axelblaze8789 Learn some real history from the world's perspective, Indian.
Do you know that bat meat is considered a delicacy in Kerela, |ndia? Palki Sharma (before she undergoes some skin whitening treatment) once reported it in a video saved in my playlist. 🤭😂🤣
In china:
- you can't drink tap water without boiling it first
- Gotta watch out for HUMAN shit and spit on the sidewalk
- Get diarrhea twice a week from nobody practicing basic hygiene
- Almost get steamrolled crossing the street because drivers never stop for pedestrians
- Driving is a clusterf*ck because the police doesn't do anything unless it's speeding
- Can't own a house longer than 70 years because houses don't last that long due to shitty rushed builds and low inspection standards
@@joeblodontchno5309 An Indian preaching about basic hygiene to others makes me laugh. 🤭🤣
*Indian source:* Times of India
*Title of article/research/report:* Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open.
*What article said specifically:* India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open
*Title of article/research/report:*
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
*Global Source:*
UNICEF
*What article said specifically:*
India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
@@joeblodontchno5309 Next time, debate using facts and reputable sources such as UNICEF, when sanitation is concern. Until then, cheap words will remain as cheap words.
@@joeblodontchno5309 Cheap words, nothing substantiated. Indian's way.
Legend has it that India is still waiting for the 1 TRILLION dollars climate finance from the entire world (COP26) before they will do something about climate change. The latest heat wave in India: "India Temperature Nears Record Above 50C as Heat Wave Worsens (Bloomberg)" is a testament of Karma/retribution😁
India is considered closer to the Western powers due to the British Raj. However, during the 1940s, a Chinese scientist named, "Qian Xuesen", was handpicked and selected to participate in the "Manhattan Project" but not an Indian scientist? IQ matters.
My condolences to all the victims who suffered and died because of the |ndian regime.
Land grabbing and expansionist |ndia since 1947 independence.
1947 Annexation of Kashmir
1948 Annexation of Hyderabad
1948 Annexation of Junagadh
1949 Annexation of Manipur
1949 Annexation of Tripura
1951 Annexation of South Tibet
1951 Nagaland plebiscite - 99.9% of the Nagas wanted independence from India
1961 Annexation of Goa
1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal
1962 Aggression against China
1971 Annexation of Turtuk, Pakistan
1972 Annexation of Tin Bigha, Bangladesh
1975 Annexation of Sikkim (the whole country)
1983 (Aborted) Attempted invasion of Mauritius
1990 (Failed) Attempted annexation of Bhutan
2006 Annexation of Duars, Bhutan
2013 Annexation of Moreh, Myanmar
Ya keep on throwing propaganda US bot. We Indian's ain't falling for that.
What influences does India have on the global stage and on BRICS? India does not even have regional influence in the sub-continent, Pakistan/Bangladesh/Maldives ("India out"), let alone global influences. Please, India influence is overshadowed by their superior neighbors, namely China and Russia. India can only be a follower at best, never a leader.
In china:
- you can't drink tap water without boiling it first
- Gotta watch out for HUMAN shit and spit on the sidewalk
- Get diarrhea twice a week from nobody practicing basic hygiene
- Almost get steamrolled crossing the street because drivers never stop for pedestrians
- Driving is a clusterf*ck because the police doesn't do anything unless it's speeding
- Can't own a house longer than 70 years because houses don't last that long due to shitty rushed builds and low inspection standards
@@joeblodontchno5309 An Indian preaching about basic hygiene to others makes me laugh. 🤭🤣
*Indian source:* Times of India
*Title of article/research/report:* Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open.
*What article said specifically:* India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open
*Title of article/research/report:*
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
*Global Source:*
UNICEF
*What article said specifically:*
India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
@@joeblodontchno5309 Cheap words, nothing substantiated. Indian's way. 🤥🥱
@@joeblodontchno5309 Talk after you have the statistical facts and video proofs and sources of information. Until then, they are cheap words with no substantiation.
@@joeblodontchno5309 When basic hygiene and sanitation has to be taught in the 21st century......
Title of article: *India has highest incidence of diarrhoeal deaths: Study*
Source: *Times of India*
What article said specifically: The World Health Organization estimates that between 90,000 and 153,000 children die from rotavirus infection in India each year. According to the WHO, more than 2.3 million children below five years of age die in India annually. Of these, about 334,000 die from diarrhoea-related diseases.
UNICEF 2014 report on sanitation said that |ndia has the largest population of people, around 597 million, practicing open defecation. 🤭. Having a hard time coping, PM Modi of |ndia launched the |ndian national toilet program, "Swachh Bharat toilet Mission", on year 2014 with the goal of ending open defecation over a period of 5 years by attempting to make 110 million toilets for 600 million |ndians. 110 million toilets do not magically appear. You need time to make. Modi in early October 2019, announced to a crowd in Ahmedabad city that |ndia is now free of open defecation with 110 million toilets built in five years and 600 million people gaining access to them. From October 2019 to March 2024, is only 3 months + 36 months + 3 months = 42 months, which is only about 3.5 years ago. |ndia has the largest population of people, around 597 million, practicing open defecation UNTIL they have toilets, which is merely 3.5 years ago. |ndia is the #1 open toilet and #1 open defecation country. Fact.
In china:
- you can't drink tap water without boiling it first
- Gotta watch out for HUMAN shit and spit on the sidewalk
- Get diarrhea twice a week from nobody practicing basic hygiene
- Almost get steamrolled crossing the street because drivers never stop for pedestrians
- Driving is a clusterf*ck because the police doesn't do anything unless it's speeding
- Can't own a house longer than 70 years because houses don't last that long due to shitty rushed builds and low inspection standards
@@joeblodontchno5309 Talk after you have the statistical facts and video proofs and sources of information. Until then, they are cheap words with no substantiation.
@@joeblodontchno5309 An Indian preaching basic hygiene to others makes me laugh. 🤭🤣
*Indian source:* Times of India
*Title of article/research/report:* Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open.
*What article said specifically:* India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open
*Title of article/research/report:*
Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
*Global Source:*
UNICEF
*What article said specifically:*
India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
@@joeblodontchno5309 Cheap words, nothing substantiated. Indian's way.
BRICS should take India out of Brics because India can not decide with Brics or America if me I take India out of Brics
....and replace India with Indonesia and still have BRICS.
@@slimjim394😂 Indonesia 😂
Baltimore Bridge collapse 2024.
"Sai Varshith Kandula" failed, however, his 22 |ndian brethren succeeded.
Members of some countries are crying in the comment section because they are not part of this alliance 😂 while due to their stupidity they will never be part of this type of alliance 😂.
India is Pawn of America , it is not in geopolitical landscapes nor in BRICS countries . Joining Shanghai Corporation Doesn't means India have role to play in BRICS nations platform. It is Not in Belt and road initiative, nor in any other trade platform promotion events .
It is definitely overshadowed by Russia and China. And the more nations that continue to join BRICS puts the anti-western motive at risk. Keep adding to BRICS. It’ll self-implode inevitably.
@@TheFutureForwardChannel...I assume adding BRICS members is to weaken the dollar hegemony.
@@slimjim394Spot on!
@@TheFutureForwardChannel : Nobody have created Anti-Western motives it is created by Western countries since historical records events . Which have surface in 21st Century as they only still continued the Same trendy till now which becomes risk factors .
chinese should be ashamed that they are still ruled by a communist dictator while even africans are advancing politically with democratic societies.. look at south africa, kenya etc., where elections to choose leaders are becoming regular.. chinese are decades behind africa politically.. & when chinese eventually transition away from communist dictatorships, there could be chaos & china might break apart like the former soviet union..
India claimed to be the world's largest population country but how can a country's population be known before a population census was made in the first place? When was India's latest population census done and when did the "world's largest population country" gimmick came out? India's latest population census was only done in year 2011 and the "world's largest population country" gimmick came out during year 2023 which is why Chinese media reacted with "China focuses on population quality, 'not raw numbers,' says expert (CGTN)"? Why? Why was the 2021 or 2020 population census postponed and how many years has it been postponed? 🤭Because the gimmick wasn't real? 🤥🤭Because 🔀At least 4.7 million people died in India due to Covid-19 in 2020 and 2021, the World Health Organization said on Thursday (HindustanTimes)🔚 ?? 🤭🤣😂😅
Take their GDP with a pinch of salt and exercise some logical thinking and common sense. How many times has India changed their methodology of calculating GDP? Did Harvard University, one of the best Universities of the world, said that India overstated their GDP by changing the methodology of calculating their GDP? If their GDP is really that great, why is that Indian "economic refugees" are going around worldwide begging for jobs and citizenships?
One aspect of India that is not appreciated by the world at large is that India still covets its neighbor's land to this day. We all know that India was created in 1947 as the successor polity to the departed British Raj. But while the people who ruled the subcontinent have been indigenized, the geopolitical mindset of the people is still thoroughly British in the era of the Raj. That means India is still an expansionist to this day, just as the Raj was an expansionist in its days. In 1954, India published a map of its territory and, for the first time, made South Tibet, Sikkim, and Bhutan part of India. In 1975, India annexed Sikkim, and Bhutan is still threatened by India's territorial design on its territory to this day. With respect to China, the presumption of the question is misguided. The question is not whether India has what it takes to stand up to China; the question is whether China has what it takes to stand up to India. To show what I mean, I put together a timeline of the events relevant to how South Tibet became Arunachal Pradesh.
1912: In the first full year of the Republic of China after the fall of the Qing dynasty, the United States National Geographic Magazine dedicated an issue to China. Accompanying the issue is a large and detailed fold-out map of China. The map clearly shows that Dirang Dzong (德讓宗) and Tawang (達旺) are within the boundary of China.
1943: British India likely calculated that dealing with the Lhasa government was easier than with the Republic of China's Nationalist Government in extracting land concessions and proposed to the United States to recognize Tibet's right to exchange diplomatic representatives with other powers. The Americans rejected this proposal:
"The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims."
1944: British India annexed Dirang Dzong (德讓宗), a Tibetan-settled area. Dzong means fort in Tibetan. The Chinese Government (the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China, seated in Kunming at the time because of World War II) protested to the British. So did the Tibetan Lhasa government.
1945: British India intruded into the tribal area of South Tibet.
February 1947: The Chinese Nationalist Government lodged a complaint with the Indian mission, which was by then newly established in China, on British India's border intrusions into Chinese territory.
August 1947: Britain left South Asia, and India was created as the successor polity to the departed British. India's creation means that a country that historically did not exist suddenly appears on China's doorstep.
October 1947: The Tibetan Lhasa Government dispatched a formal request to New Delhi, asking the newly independent Indian Government to withdraw all its predecessors' intrusions into the territory between the McMahon Line and the traditional border beneath the foothills and return a wide swath of territory from Ladakh to Assam, including Sikkim and the Darjeeling district.
1949: When the defeat of the Nationalist Government in China's civil war was imminent, the Republic of China's ambassador in New Delhi reminded the Indian Government that China did not recognize the McMahon Line and held the Simla Convention invalid.
October 1949: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) took control of the mainland, and its civil war rival, the Republic of China, retreated to Taiwan.
December 1949: India recognized the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government, effectively cutting off the diplomatic channel the Republic of China used to deliver its protests to India.
February 1951: India annexed Tawang (達旺), the birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to the four-hundred-year-old Tawang Monastery. The Tibetan authorities in Lhasa protested but were simply informed by the Indian political officer that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again, accusing the Indian Government of 'seizing as its own what did not belong to it.' The Tibetans went on to ask New Delhi to withdraw its forces from Tawang immediately. The protests were ignored. The Republic of China (which had already retreated to Taiwan by then and had no diplomatic relation with India) also vehemently denounced India's territorial travesty. The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) made no noise.
1954: India published a new map showing South Tibet as part of India. The map also shows the two countries, Sikkim and Bhutan, as part of India.
January 1959: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) commented for the first time on the issue of South Tibet when Zhou Enlai, in a letter to Nehru, offered to concede South Tibet to India. However, India rejected the offer, as it also sought control over Aksai Chin.
1960: India started establishing posts (border markers) north of South Tibet (north of the McMahon Line) and proclaiming that it has the right to unilaterally 'improve' the McMahon Line as it sees fit.
October 1962: After years of warning, China attacked India's position in South Tibet and recovered Tawang shortly. Three weeks later, in a second wave, China recovered the whole of South Tibet.
November 1962: China unilaterally withdrew back to the north of the McMahon line.
1975: India annexed Sikkim.
1987: India made South Tibet a state and renamed it the so-called Arunachal Pradesh. The Republic of China (Taiwan) put out a statement denouncing India. Here is the statement:
"In regard to the issue of the Indian government's illegal occupation of our country's territory and the establishment of the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh,' the foreign ministry of the Republic of China issued the following announcement at midnight: India's illegal occupation of our country's territory has been repeatedly stated by the Government of the Republic of China as something it will not recognize. Recently, the Indian Congress unilaterally passed the establishment of 'Arunachal Pradesh' to the south of the so-called McMahon Line. The Indian Government also made it a state. The Government of the Republic of China once again solemnly proclaims that the Government of India intends to legitimize its illegal occupation of Chinese territory. The Government of the Republic of China regards this as illegal, void, and absolutely not recognized."
2008: A little over a decade after Britain returned Hong Kong to China, Britain finally had no stake in Tibet and could afford to be honest for once. The British government made a statement recognizing China's sovereignty over Tibet (previously recognized as suzerainty, not sovereignty). The statement, supported by both the Conservative and Labour parties, is remarkable for its honesty in admitting that Britain once had territorial ambitions in Tibet, and it adopts an almost apologetic tone. Here is an excerpt:
"...But our position is unusual for one reason of history that has been imported into the present: the anachronism of our formal position on whether Tibet is part of China, and whether in fact we harbour continued designs to see the break-up of China. We do not.
Our ability to get our points across has sometimes been clouded by the position the UK took at the start of the 20th century on the status of Tibet, a position based on the geopolitics of the time. Our recognition of China's "special position" in Tibet developed from the outdated concept of suzerainty. Some have used this to cast doubt on the aims we are pursuing and to claim that we are denying Chinese sovereignty over a large part of its own territory. We have made clear to the Chinese Government, and publicly, that we do not support Tibetan independence. Like every other EU member state, and the United States, we regard Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. "
2014: A Tibetan Chinese named Nido Tania from Arunachal Pradesh (occupied South Tibet) went to old Delhi and was beaten to death because he 'looked Chinese.'
2024: The festering border dispute between India and China persists, and India shows no sign of giving up its stolen property.
Thank you, I am going to save it just for the Indian bots.
@@ShitSkinsIndian Thanks. I saw your comments in other channels too. Hopefully more and more people will know about what you and I have been saying.
@@PomegranateChocolate Yes, I hope so.
The Indian debt/death trapping Nepal is unforgivable eg. 2015 Nepal blockade (please do some research). What is even more unforgivable is expansionist |ndia stealing lands and annexing Kalapani from Nepal on year 1962. |and grabbing |ndia has encroached Nepali land, and Nepal can do nothing about it. |ndia has paid off Nepali politicians, and they will keep their mouth shut. Kalapani was encroached from 1962 by |ndia using its military. In 1952, Nepal gave permission to temporarily place |ndian Armies in its Northern boundary foreseeing the dangers from the Chinese side. In the year of 1962, India made a bunker in Kalapani and placed its camp there, as the China-|ndia war broke out. At that time, the there were 18 |ndian camps including Kalapani, inside the Nepalese borders. After the war, when Nepal asked the |ndian side to remove its armies from all Nepalese regions, |ndia removed them from all the places except in Kalapani. And even till now, Kalapani is under the |ndian Military’s control. One step forward of the military encroachment, |ndia took a political step in encroachment as it added Kalapani to its border on the new map published by Survey of |ndia on November 2, 2019.
Khalistan is a never going to happen, stop with the lies ,
@@Peacecommunity777 A simple research would reveal who's lying and who's not. Topic: 2015 Nepal blockade.
@@Peacecommunity777
Lies? Your people have mastered the art of lying. Indian historians said that the Mughals did not exist.
Makes you wonder what else they wouldn't lie.🤔🤭
News headlines:
"Why is Modi so scared of history textbooks?"
"Why is India trying to erase Mughal history from Indian school books?"
"India history debate after chapter on Mughals dropped"
@@Peacecommunity777 A simple research would reveal who's lying and who's not. Topic: 1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal
@@Peacecommunity777 Indian historians said that the Mughals did not exist.
Makes you wonder what else they wouldn't lie.
News headlines:
"Why is Modi so scared of history textbooks?"
"Why is India trying to erase Mughal history from Indian school books?"
"India history debate after chapter on Mughals dropped"
India plays off one against the other to maximize its own advantage. Case in point, India massively increased import of Russian oil, refines it and resell to Europe at a significant profit, despite western sanctions. India knows it can get away with it because the U.S. needs India to help balance China, and also Europe actually needs that oil. India has been paying Russian oil with its rupees, which Russia actually got to use recently by purchasing artillery ammunition from India for its war efforts in Ukraine. Again, India was able to do get away with this because it knows the U.S. needs it to balance against China, and so won't say anything about it.
Don't underestimate the Indians. They are more clever than you give them credit for.
You trickier not clever?
@@lifequestions5546 chinese should be ashamed that they are still ruled by a communist dictator while even africans are advancing politically with democratic societies.. look at south africa, kenya etc., where elections to choose leaders are becoming regular.. chinese are decades behind africa politically.. & when chinese eventually transition away from communist dictatorships, there could be chaos & china might break apart like the former soviet union..
@@joeblodontchno5309 India should be ashamed of using "democracy" as a disguise for their real system of governance, which is, facism. India 's system of governance is facism, never democracy. You simply don't send "buttonmen" to target non voters and political opponents.
1) did a 8 x Bollywood MI6 in Qatar?
2) did a "Hardeep Singh Nijjar" in Canada?
3) did a "Nikhil Gupta" in USA?
4) did a "Constable Chetan Singh" to the non voters in India?
Constable Chetan Singh: If you want to live and vote in |ndia, I am telling you it's only Modi or Yogi......or ELSE 🤭🤐☠
5) how many more "buttonmen" has he got to "fix" his political opponents and non voters?
These facts should tell you whether the Indian voting process is fair. 🤭😅🤣😂Think logically, think independently, think with an open mind and think smart.
@@joeblodontchno5309 India should be ashamed of using "democracy" as a disguise for their real system of governance "facism". India 's system of governance is facism, never democracy. The 79.8% Hindu majority country, India, is never democracy. Real democracy never had a Hindu Caste System that oppresses the lower caste. Indians say that there are no caste system in India? But what are "caste related violence" and why is it still happening? What are the Musahar people and what are their dietary? Explain what are Caste Certificates and why everyone in India has to get one?
Take out the word, "clever", in your essay and replaced it with "deceitful" or "scheming" and it would sound more accurate.
Double headed snake
At the end of the day, India is not a superpower, either economically or militarily ! Further the fact that it has joined different abd opposing alliances has shown itself to have a divided rather than a single unified focus and so it can't ever be a true superpower!
chinese should be ashamed that they are still ruled by a communist dictator while even africans are advancing politically with democratic societies.. look at south africa, kenya etc., where elections to choose leaders are becoming regular.. chinese are decades behind africa politically.. & when chinese eventually transition away from communist dictatorships, there could be chaos & china might break apart like the former soviet union..
@@joeblodontchno5309 India should be ashamed of using "democracy" as a disguise for their real system of governance "facism". India 's system of governance is facism, never democracy. The 79.8% Hindu majority country, India, is never democracy. Real democracy never had a Hindu Caste System that oppresses the lower caste. Indians say that there are no caste system in India? But what are "caste related violence" and why is it still happening? What are the Musahar people and what are their dietary? Explain what are Caste Certificates and why everyone in India has to get one?
@@joeblodontchno5309 India should be ashamed of using "democracy" as a disguise for their real system of governance, which is, facism. India 's system of governance is facism, never democracy. You simply don't send "buttonmen" to target non voters and political opponents.
1) did a 8 x Bollywood MI6 in Qatar?
2) did a "Hardeep Singh Nijjar" in Canada?
3) did a "Nikhil Gupta" in USA?
4) did a "Constable Chetan Singh" to the non voters in India?
Constable Chetan Singh: If you want to live and vote in |ndia, I am telling you it's only Modi or Yogi......or ELSE 🤭🤐☠
5) how many more "buttonmen" has he got to "fix" his political opponents and non voters?
These facts should tell you whether the Indian voting process is fair. 🤭😅🤣😂Think logically, think independently, think with an open mind and think smart.
With such ridiculous presentation of "geopolitical science" you won't go very far. Yet another useless channel.
Dr Manoj Mittal from Haryana, India, is the greatest Hindu gourmet 🤭🤣🙂 and pride from |ndia. His favorite food = 🐄💩🤭
This is fictional stuff. India will not play second fiddle to any Brics country, neither China nor Russia. All countries within Brics are equal partners. The question is whether India can adapt to Brics without being overtly obsessed with the US.
The notion that all countries within BRICS are equal is definitely fiction. And the more countries that keep being added will inevitably erode the power and influence that China and Russia currently hold.
@@TheFutureForwardChannelRight! not all members are equal. China has the intention and potential to hurt us but in the case of US which comes wearing the mask of democracy, freedom, rule based order etc etc lectures everyone while they themselves violate those principles when it suits their interest. Also it is evident how they backstab their own allies. A snake can never be trusted. Even though China is our enemy but our interests converge in case of US. We have seen what the US led west has done to Japan, Korea in the past and now China and how they exercise petrodollar irresponsibly. Do you think we are unaware of that?