Are Mongols & Turks Descendants of Proto-Huns? |
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 06. 2021
- Are Mongols & Turks Descendants of Proto-Huns?
Watch Full Episode: • #AskAbhijit 3: Genghis...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
►PayPal: paypal.me/AbhijitChavda
►Become A Member on CZcams: / @abhijitchavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN #AbhijitChavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
★Website:
★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AbhijitChavdaPodcast
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1WmKYRI...
★Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
★Google Podcasts: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
★Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/show/the-abh...
★Amazon Music: music.amazon.in/podcasts/c879...
★Soundcloud: / abhijitchavda
★Audible: www.audible.com/pd/item_name-...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
Thank you for watching!
Please share the video and spread the message. 🙏
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk erased Arabic and Persian words from official Ottoman Turkish. Rural people always spoke real Turkish language unaffected by Arabo-Persian words.
Ottoman Society has basically two Turkish language. Court language with many Arabo-Persian influence, Folk language with lesser elements from Arabo-Persian culture.
İslamcılara (Müslüman değil, İslamcı) benzeyen bir Kemalist (Atatürkçü değil, Kemalist) sik kırığı. Bir bitmediniz amk
The amount of loanwords in spoken Anatolian Turkish throughout the centuries and depending on regions and dialects were between ~10% up to almost ~20%, mainly from Arabic/Arabic words via Persian and Persian proper, Unlike the so called 'High Ottoman (Turkish)" which was the "book language" of the Ottoman Empire that consisted of up to ~80% foreign vocabulary and never had been spoken in daily conversation.
In modern official Turkish, this ratio is around 12-15% depending on context(even if we include pre-islamic Iranic [Scythian/Sarmatian/Sogdian etc.] loanwords).
So in terms of the spoken language, nothing has changed apart from the natural evolution of the language. Turkish society were mostly illiterate before 1920s in anyway. Highest estimates of literacy are no more than 30%( 99% of them being male) in Ottoman Anatolia even in the late 19th century.
We should revive original Türk religion because Islam is forced by Arabs on Türks, Tengrism should be revived,The Religion of Great ancestors of Türks 🇹🇯🇰🇬🇰🇿🇺🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷🇲🇳🕊️
Turkified Mongols or Monglified Turks...nobody can tell the difference. It's not just the way of life (Tengrism), but also in genetics, food, music, clothing, burial system...as well as the origin place in South Siberia and Mongolia.
The similarities between languages are almost zero. Which is incredibly surprising since both nations originating from nearby areas but culturally there huge differences among them
Hun and Mongol and Turk are different ethnic groups of people 😅😂
Huns Turkic bro@@Kingofthehill84
@@volkanozturkmen6245😂 stop joking bro
@@EchoVortex713 Turks huns and mongols coming from scythians we are same blood.
Great information Sir!!
Great info and knowledge
Thanks a lot for the information.
There were also Turks who embraced Judaism like the Khazar Turks in the 7th / 8th century.
Sir kindly suggest some books for deep information about our history
Huns were Oghur Turkic people from Gaoju confederation
Very fascinating
Hey hey Kurt Cobain
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
Thank you brother for trying to give an unbiased information.
You are ocean of knowledge !!
How did Central Asians look before the TURKIC invasions?
Sister, mehmood gazwni,gouri,khilji or mughals all of them looked like chinese or mongol to us. And in our film industry we see allauddin khilji played by our south asian desi patha ranveer singh. How funny.
@Peter Mercado no central asian before turkic invasion were of persian like people.
@Peter Mercado but one thing i notice that real turks(central asian) has mongoilad features while today turkey is not real turks. They are greeks of anatolia.
They looked like you and me before the Turkic invasions. In other words, Indian.
Turkic people were always in Central Asia even most of the people in America were moved from the same region around 15000-12000 years ago
There are numerous exactly same words with same meaning in Peruvian native languages that I personally witnessed
Jai Hind. The Turks had ruled India for many Millinea. Luckily we Indians are not turkified by the Hunnic invaders.
Pranaam Prabhu....
Emilio Zapata from Mexico I believe that his ancestral Roots are Attila ..They also called him the little tiger and caudillo del sur and E...
Sir, can u tell me where from bhat tribe came from , ancestor line...
Bhatta is not a tribe. Bhatta is a title used for Brahmans . Bhatta in Sanskrit means doctor or philosopher or educated man.
@@gauravshah89bro look at haplogroups and you know North India has a different origin than South Indians haplogroup maps prove this, North Indians have R1a haplogroup
@@JagdDachshund so ?
1:37 Magyars were Uralic.
Thank you for mentioning Ataturk's research about Turkish people ancestry you are a real non biased historian sir. Mongols and Turks are both altaic people descendants of Huns/Hiong Nu's. Mete Khan (Oghuz Khan sagas) is the son of founder of Hiong Nu empire called Touman (Teoman), who aggressively expanded the Hiong Nu empire and been a big trouble for Han Dynasty of China if im not wrong that they just defined these people exactly the same how Turks and Mongols are defined in Gokturk documents, Mongol documents. Literally the same people i mean they were one nation they didnt differ eachother like you are turk or you are mongolian. Just turkic population was much more than mongol population even can be seen in Mongol Empire.
@AskAbhijit sir right now you have mentioned the shri chapa rajput dynasty where king vyagrahmukha had hunnic ancestry, I want know to are the Rajputs the desendents of huns ?
No
Yes
@@ramanpalyal North Rajputs are descendants of Huns
@@AdiHaiKyaI think rajputs are not related to huns but gujjars most probably. And jat maybe most probably scithians.
🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂Sir what was the effect of Maharana Pratap on Akbar? 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Why not in hindi?
What about scythian Huns invasion of India....who are they actually Turks or Mongols...as they mixed with Aryans and become Rajput
Indians never used Aryan word as ethnic term. Even Tamil kings were given title of being ARYA.
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
@@AdiHaiKyaHun are Turkic tribe
Sir🙏🙏
Unlike this please sir also start making more history documentery and videos on it. 🙏🏻
Fake news 😅
if this so why the numbers are not the same. normally you will find the connection in the numbers. there are borrowed names but they are not the same people. turks evolved between don und dnjepr - in the near of the germanic people. they went thousand years before to Altay and some to europe or med.
All rajpoot are huns
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
So nothern India has also hunnic identity too !! Cool !!
Were kushans & sakas?
Were they indo European or hunnic?
The kushans were descendants of yuezhis
Kushans were Tocharic and Sakas were Iranic
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
Huns in modern India are Rajputs gujjar banjara raigar rabaaris and sikh are kidarite Huns. Chavda is also a hunnic descent.
Earth is not in spherical shape. it's in Hun shape.
Fool like u, always try to prove that every community in india r foreigners.
@@temuzin879 your a fool most of the north Indians are indeed foreigners if you have 1% brain. You will accept that truth.
And Huns are scythian descent.
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 Gujjars 🔥
Are Hundals of present day Punjab and UP the descendants of Hunns?
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
@@AdiHaiKyalol huns were Asian mongolian people.
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
@@kali848 Lactose milk lover. tabhi hum itne strong the 🗿🔥
thank you for your perfect analyz but there is a small mistake, the Turks are the forefathers of the Mongols, Europeans, Native Americans and many Indians and some Asian people.
SEARCH at CZcams for this: *Genetic history of P1-M45: Proto-Turkic ancestors of Europeans, Native Americans and Indians | 1*
@@humnnn
Dude, it is official. The Turkish State saying that too. Search for Turkish Presidential Logo, you will find this:
The symbol, which is composed of a sun with 8 long and 8 short rays surrounded by 16 stars, is named “the Presidential Seal.” The sun represents the infinity of the Republic of Türkiye and the 16 stars represent the 16 independent great Turkish empires in history. This seal is the Presidential Emblem.
Now search for 16 Great Turkic Empires and you will find on the top of the List Xiongnu or known as the Huns. The creator of the Hunnic Empire is Metehan or known as Oguz Khan, the Forefather of all Turks.
The Turkish Land Forces official foundation year is 203 BC, the Date goes back to Metehan the creator of the Turkish Land Forces.
The West should stop to try to each us our own History. We are saying this since centuries and today with DNA Tests they are giving us right. Even Atatürk said in the early 1900s that Turks and Native Americans are comming from the same Tribe, they are Turks too.
WE KNOW OUR HISTORY and this goes
back more than 40.000 years to the past.
And not only that, nearly all Pyramids of the world are connected to Turks, in American Continent, in China or in Egypt, all re connected to Turks but they are still trying to cover it up. The truth will come out, soon or later !
@@humnnn
Get some education dude, that was 8.000 or 10.000BC , these were humans like you and me and they were Turks from Central Asia. They were not called Huns but Turks.
@@humnnn
Are you still talking ? They have proven it with DNA Tests, what are you telling here ? Didnt you watch the video i prefered in my first Comment ? If not, watch it, then talk.
Turanism is a myth
Vedic Sanatan was strongly monotheistic, not polytheist. Proper polytheism in India started only after Boodist hangover & composition of Puranas, but even contemporaries like the great Chanakya regarded idolatory as ignorance.
it is not like that. any proof you have?
Vedas are neither mono nor poly. mono -poly is Islamic concept.
vedic concept is "Sarvam Brahma"
Since brahman is everywhere and everything, numbers like mono-poly cannot be applied to brahman.
@@gauravshah89 Nope.
@@ayushgupta4376 Brahman is not countable. Even air is not countable. Then how can brahman be countable. Counting Allah is Islamic obsession. Counting Brahman/Ishwara is not vedic obsession.
Great rebuttal @@ayushgupta4376
Huns had r1a dna
huns are turkish and not hungarian
Huns Turkic🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇺🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇭🇺 bro
*Turkic
mental. Hun's. Ar. Xiongu. Gujjar not turk
Huns at gujjar. Not turk
Mughals were a cross from Mongols and Turks..
Exactly! I heard that that one of the sons of Chengiz Khan converted to Islam to appease Alaluddin Khilji. And it was the grandson of this converted Chengiz Khan's son who was Babar. And then the Mughal Empire starts.
@@pranavbagurjagadeesha1208 ok, I was confused about this for so long. Thanks for clarifying.
Cause I heard sir say that Mongols never invaded India, whereas Sanjeev Sanyal (again a great Scholar) said that Mongols invaded India twice and even made Khilji leave delhi for 6 months.
Sanjeev even said Mughals were muslims, whereas I heard Abhijit say that Mongols were budhists, thus I was confused on how babur or Mughals if are descendants of Mongols then how come Mughals are muslims.
Again thanks a lot for Clarifying.
@@kunalmandhare3144 Bro, welcome! But Mongols and Mughals are different. Mongols were Buddhists from Mongolia whereas Mughals were descendents of Mongols and Turks. The name "Mughal" was given by Britishers. So don't get confuse it with Mongols.
@@pranavbagurjagadeesha1208 thanks
@@pranavbagurjagadeesha1208 mangold weren't Buddhist they followed Tangrism which is more similar to vedic monism. Some Mongols did became Buddhists after mongolian power was declined and Buddhism was forced upon them but they still remained mostly tangrist.
Proto mongols origin xianbei donghu
Thank you sir 🙏
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
Jai shree Ram 🚩
Bhai jitne ism gina diye...unka matlab toh samja do every one is not as literate and knowlageble as you are
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Google search kar le
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
Turkish war of independence? Hmm unlike other people we Turks never got colonised or lost independence,just for you to know .
How Huns are converted into turkes
And how they become islamic
Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans 🔥
If i am not wrong , turkic means people from Turkmenistan.
you are wrong
You are. People from Turkmenistan are called Turkman
Turks came from the gokturks
@@Joker_Voorhees*Xiuognu
Turkmen means " I am a Turk " in the Turkmen language .
Turkish subs pleasee
The Huns are the ancestors of the Turks. The names of the Huns are Turkic and their language is Turkish and the word hun means nomad in Chinese. Turks are a nomadic race.The first state of the Turks was founded in 220 BC and the name of the state was Asia Hun
have you ever considered the possibility? the Mongols also had the same so called "Turkic" names. its only Westerners like to say that Huns had Turkic names but should this be the other way around. Turks having Hunnic names and so is Mongols.
Mongols also had Hunnic names but you claim Hunns name being Turkic. its like your claiming All of Hunns and that other nations that come from Hunns descendants to be not Hunns.
@@timexyemerald6290The Huns are Turks, they are not Mongols or any other race, the ancestors of the Mongols are the Tungus and the Huns, they massacred the Mongols and ruled them for a long time, and the known names of the Huns are Mete Khan, Teoman Attila, the Huns are the ancestors of the Turks, they are not the ancestors of other races, and there were Turks in Mongolia before, the Mongols were on the Chinese side, and even Turkish structures and inscriptions in Mongolia. there is
@timexyemerald6290 The Huns have nothing to do with the Mongols and the Gokturk state is the continuation of the Huns
The huns were part of the mongoloid race just like the Chinese, Japanese, Mongolians and Koreans. The turks r mixed mongoloids.
@@timexyemerald6290 Ancestors of Mongolians were literally Proto-Mongolic Donghu while Turkic peoples were Proto-Turkic Hsiung-nu, who literally slaughtered Donghu
90% of Genghis khans army was Turkic, also the the old Turkic runes are nearly all identical to the viking runes and they share over 100's of words with the same meaning, there is also a theory by a Scandinavian professor which states that Odin is from Turkland, it is also said that the native Indian's of America are descendents of the Turkic, could you help clarify these please, I think it would be fascinating to dive into this
I don’t think scandanavians have anything to do with asians, im half Danish and half eastern european and i can feel a small amount of asianess on that side but none on the Danish side
2nd
Firstly, Turks are descendants of gök Turks. Therefore, Turkic and mongolic are 2 different Altaic ethnicities. 2ndly, The Turks were on the verge of becoming Christians before they were Islamasized. Lets use Turkey as an example; the apostles and many descendants of Jesus did travel to Turkey preaching the gospel. As a result, many Turks did follow Christianity, which explains why there are many churches in the country till this very day.
And the KökTürks are the Descandants of the Huns (XiongNu)
Turks were not in Anatolia while the christianity was spreading over there. Besides, even if Turks would accept Christianity they would predominantly be of what would be considered heretical by mainstream christians, like Nestorianism. Apart from that, any doctrine arising from settled folk mythologies like polytheism, henotheism, avatarism, tripartide/multipartide godhood etc. does not go hand in hand with some rebellious, free-spirited people worshipping Tengri.
That is one of the cultural reasons that there are Turks who are orthodox christians, but mostly and by majority cultural due to Slavic influence, as there had been "nominally" Bogomilist Turks, most of them without any knowledge neither care of the concept of trinity, even Jehova's Witness Turks but very very rarely catholic or protestant ones
Turks are Xiong Nu Mongolians are Dong Hu according to the chinese
It was Xian Bei that were considered to be proto-para-Mongolic., not the Dong Hu
Historically speaking, proto-Turkic dominion on the Eastern Steppe must have ended by proto-para-Mongols taking over them and making the Turks their blacksmith-vassals. It is evident that proto-Turks must have dominated the Eastern Steppe, as evidenced by tremendously disproportionate number of loanwords between proto-Turkic to proto-para-Mongolic and proto-para-Mongolic to Turkic.
@@HatredForMankind and than they got owned by the GökTürks for insulting them
@@korkufilmleriscarymovies2283 After the adoptation of the horse, it was a cyclic struggle of domination between North-East Asian tribes proto Turks dominating Scythians, proto para Mongols and Yeniseyans, Mongols dominating Turks, Turks redominating Mongols etc. up until 17th century.
1st
Xiangnou people gave rise to huns...huns gave rise to various turks and Mongols...Rouran khaganate and the Gorktuk Khaganate and then Kazakh khanganate and then other Khaganates before the rise of Genghis khan...
There are some wrong knowledges. Please don't talk surely if you don't know well
The huns were a mongolic tribe who mixed with the turks
😂
The Huns have nothing to do with the Mongols and the Göktürk state is the continuation of the Huns.
Huns🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇺🇿🇭🇺 Turkic
The ancestors of the Mongols are the Tungus, not the Huns, and the Huns massacred the Mongols and ruled for a long time.
@@volkanozturkmen6245 aren't huns and mongols both mongoloid?
not the huns are the turks the huns ruled the mongols and the continuation of the huns are the Gokturks@@Joker_Voorhees
Huns were Turks.
But they are definitely not Turkish 😂
@@MB-rb9tk what you mean????
@@yenidenturktarihtezi You need to understand that turkey was a nation occupied and colonized by turkic people, not a tukic nation. It is like peru claiming to be spain.
@@MB-rb9tk lmao majority of the Turkish nation is Turkic. What the f are you talking. Brainless kid
@@user-fg6xj2tq5q Huns were Turkic and ancestors of many Turkic people.
*Today Gujjar community are the decendant of Huns & Kushans* 🔥
and gurjar pratiharas also