Cruyff as per usual, talking gibberish and nonsense. 4 goals scored, two fantastic teams filled with many legends, and once again, Cruyff handing out imaginary trophies for 'best football'.
I always disliked cruyff he was arrogant ( this is a dutch trait in my experience as well as rudeness and a complete lack of subtlety ) and naive . The naivety was exposed when the Dutch "masters" lost in 1974 and again in 1978 . The fact is Germany was better than France on the day and italy were a great team full of great players who came together at the perfect time. Brazil couldnt defend and suffered. The worst thing about cruyyf is everyone seems to worship him and buy into his convoluted philosophies on what is a beautiful but very simple game. Does the world need to be reminded that his " dream team " were given a footballing lesson by milan in the early 90's . Im sick of this man being worshipped . He was often wrong and failed on the biggest stages. he played in lesser leagues all through his career ( and yes the spanish league is and remains a lesser league with the exception of 2 maybe 3 teams).Great player but liked the sound of his own voice too much. Was not on maradona pele puskas or george bests level as a player either and i can name more players who were superior on the pitch
YOU ARE JOKING. Cruyff was arrogant but not naive and a very shrewd judge of the game. He was totally right about attractive football - the game is all. Italy and West Germany were two poor finalists and boring to watch - not many will remember them. He rates alongside Puskas, Maradona and Pele and is easily above Best. The Hungarian, Brazilian and Argentinian leagues were no better than Spain and the English first division has always been substandard technically. Notwithstanding a temperament problem at times he had a tremendous facility (he could even have kept goal) and there are few better post 50s players than him.
The reason why Germans won in 1974 was because of their aggresive man-to-man marking. Germans are dangerous at the last minute, like Cryuff said. Look at 1974 and even 2014. Talking about Cryuff playing in lower leagues, Puskas also played in lower leagues and yet you call him on par with Pele, Maradona, Best. Lol.
Johan was the best footballer and forever will be. RIP Sir Johan Cruyff
Cruyff was 100% right.
He was always right.
It all came true.
Immenso
Such an idealist, even then...
anthtan nothing wrong with that is it ?
chris bennett He didn't imply that's even a wrong thing. DUMBASS
Garl Vinland he did dumb ass he said Brazil played the best football sick head
For him the winner are the ones who play the best football,for us who lift the trophies
Njemu su trebali igrači
Cruyff as per usual, talking gibberish and nonsense. 4 goals scored, two fantastic teams filled with many legends, and once again, Cruyff handing out imaginary trophies for 'best football'.
Cruyff was competely right in his assessment - it was one of the worst World Cup finals until the last half an hour, between two poor, boring teams.
@@gunternetzer9621in fact the two boring teams got 4 world cups,Cruyff?
One goal? Two goal.
He didn't know what he was talking about
00000 00000 hindsight 20/20
He predicted the winner and his reasoning was spot on... wtf are you talking about ?
johan cruijff exactly well said💕
I always disliked cruyff he was arrogant ( this is a dutch trait in my experience as well as rudeness and a complete lack of subtlety ) and naive . The naivety was exposed when the Dutch "masters" lost in 1974 and again in 1978 . The fact is Germany was better than France on the day and italy were a great team full of great players who came together at the perfect time. Brazil couldnt defend and suffered. The worst thing about cruyyf is everyone seems to worship him and buy into his convoluted philosophies on what is a beautiful but very simple game. Does the world need to be reminded that his " dream team " were given a footballing lesson by milan in the early 90's . Im sick of this man being worshipped . He was often wrong and failed on the biggest stages. he played in lesser leagues all through his career ( and yes the spanish league is and remains a lesser league with the exception of 2 maybe 3 teams).Great player but liked the sound of his own voice too much. Was not on maradona pele puskas or george bests level as a player either and i can name more players who were superior on the pitch
YOU ARE JOKING. Cruyff was arrogant but not naive and a very shrewd judge of the game. He was totally right about attractive football - the game is all. Italy and West Germany were two poor finalists and boring to watch - not many will remember them. He rates alongside Puskas, Maradona and Pele and is easily above Best. The Hungarian, Brazilian and Argentinian leagues were no better than Spain and the English first division has always been substandard technically. Notwithstanding a temperament problem at times he had a tremendous facility (he could even have kept goal) and there are few better post 50s players than him.
@@gunternetzer9621 Italy's 3-2 victory over Brazil at that World Cup ist still considered one of the best games ever played at World Cup stage.
The reason why Germans won in 1974 was because of their aggresive man-to-man marking. Germans are dangerous at the last minute, like Cryuff said. Look at 1974 and even 2014. Talking about Cryuff playing in lower leagues, Puskas also played in lower leagues and yet you call him on par with Pele, Maradona, Best. Lol.
@@clemensgruber7278 I would say THE best alongside Hungary 4 Uruguay 2 in 1954.
He won 3 straight champions League with Ajax between 1970 -1973 as their best player , what you talkin about ?