Tired of the bull crap. To be specific, the nonsensical lack of ANY work ethic. I am an AVID military historical fanatic and this video highlights the "IDIOCRACY " style 😎. CLICK BAIT. JUST SAYING 🤔.
@@andrewaustin6369 most of them use Chat GPT to write the script and then use the voice reader to narrate it. Then fill the video with stock video clips. I don't know this one is as bad as some, but it is clickbaity.
Deep analysis: It is a hidden message or intrusive thoughts about Ukraine war. More specifically, it has mainly something to do with the nuclear warheads, but I guess, CZcams does not allow more direct expression🎉.
I was working in the arms industry at the time Tomahawks came out. They were designed to deliver nuclear weapons. Although there was a conventional warhead option the opinion was no one would fire an expensive missile to deliver a 450kg warhead. Well since we were not in a nuclear war (and still are not) Tomahawks were used to deliver precision warheads on target (probably to save planes and pilots). So they started to be used, more were built and the unit cost dropped.
6:24 Correction: The Royal Navy’s Astute class submarine does not have vertical launch capability. It fires Tomahawk Cruise Missiles through its torpedo tubes.
The Tommahawk is a dam good weapon. Really reliable and hits the target over 96% of the time. It’s not fast but it has up to a 1500 MILE range. That’s incredible range from a cruise missile.
At around the 1:30 mark this video makes the claim that cruise missiles, like the Tomahawk, were inspired by Japanese Kamikaze planes. Really? And so modern cruise missiles weren't inspired by Germany's V1 cruise missiles, from WW2 - weapons that predated the Kamikaze tactics?
He wasn't referring to the Japanese planes. He was referring to how the weapon was guided. The German rockets were not effectively guided. The idea for the tomahawk, inspired by the kamikaze, was to have a true, reliable homing system vs a human being.
@@c2jones Really? My understanding was that the V1 were equipped with WW2 style gyroscopes and WW2 era autopilot... the lineal ancestors of the Tercom in the pre-GPS Tomahawk
@@geoswan4984 I think the narrator's comments, based up the designers of the original tomahawk, was emphasizing efficacy and accuracy. Because of the rather crude method of the V1 for calculating the impact point by the number of revolutions of a small propeller, the Germans could not use the V-1 as a precision weapon, nor could they determine the actual impact point in order to make course corrections for subsequent flights. In fact, the British publicized inaccurate information on impact points, causing the Germans to adjust their preflight calculations erroneously. As a result, V-1s often fell well short of their intended targets. Kamikazes scored 121 hits-a success rate of more than 34 percent.
As a skydiver ... even flying slow and stright. I cant belive how accurate german flak cannons were in ww2. Lob a shell so far into the sky and hit a moveing target or have enuff cannons to hit close enuff. Thats crazzy. I try to understand it all but its alot for me to learn.
If we gave 200 to Ukraine,Russia would let 200 hit their target. That would stop the oil; and gas business in Russia,no more revenue, no fuel for tanks planes and rail. It would slow the Russians to a complete stop. Russian air defense has been orders of magnitude worse than any pre war estimates. It is like the West is encouraging Russia to keep invading, for some unknown reason. most likely European leaders are corrupted by Russian fossil fuel money.
Yeah but the way the US uses assumes a high loss rate. They usually fire a lot of tomahawks at once. When we hit Syria in 2017, I think we fired 60 and that was against an inferior air defense. I would imagine a US attack against Russia would be much larger and wouldn’t be alone. Of course that how nuclear wars start
Well, the unique thing with a Tomahawk is it's ability to fly really low, officially sub 100ft, but it's no secret that it can manage down to 75ft. Combine that with a RCS of under 0.5m2, half a person - then it's not visible on radar, Hitting something with that size, 25m up in the air travellings at 550mph. Using Flak. Good luck.
@orvarino who said anything about flak? Missles are most often shot down by other Missles, planes, rapid fire guns like Phalanx etc. Flak is not common these days.
Hmm, I don’t see a connection with kamikaze, the tomahawk has its design dna more closely related to the german v1 self propelled guided bomb, which used pulse get engine and mechanical gyroscopic guidance, v1’s reigned terror over london during ww2 until British fighter interceptors developed strategies to catch them by diving from high altitude and tipping the off course using their wings, a highly dangerous manoeuvre but safer than trying to shoot them down and being engulfed by the explosion and shrapnel. The v1 was attributed to be the first cruise missile.
100 meters above the ground? That’s still too high. The sea launched variant could fly 50 feet above the water. The land attack versions depending on the terrain can fly 100 feet above the ground.
Yes,and Russia tops the list of countries with no air defense whatsoever. The Europeans throw up the white flag as usual. The French could stop them cold if they sent their antiquated aircraft, but we know they talk a big game, and do less than any European country except Luxenberg.
They did pretty will in the opening moments of Desert Storm while the Iraqis still had one of the most sophisticated air defense systems in the world, built by the Russians........
Tomahawks are GPS-guided and therefore susceptible für GPS-jamming. INS can take over for a short period of time, but the weapon looses a significant amount of accuracy. Russia's EW-capabilities have been significantly improved, therefore all GSSN-guided western weapons loose their effectiveness. Next generation of navigation is AI-targeting from all sort of sensors, where China is the leading nation.
In the Late 50's to 1975 the B-52's carried 2 AGM28B's Nuke Cruis missles. 650 NM range @1200 mph og 600 mph down low, 1.1 Mega Ton. Today the carry 20 AGM86's Nukes Ad Non Nuks. and the work. Don't know how well the HOUND DOG did Never had to LAUNCH in a real WAR. Thank your/my GOD.
So this is why Hubble maped the entire earth brdore Nasa claimed that someone had made a mistake and made the lease convex instead of concave and then used the space shuttle to replace the huge lenses to concave so it could see the stars. The military has often funded nasa projects so that military hardware can be taken into space without us knowing about it. It seemed very odd at the time when nasa said that the wrong shaped lens had been sent into space because it cost about a billion dollars at the time to make it. Replacing it later so that it could do the job nasa wanted, instead of the military need made perfect sense to anyone paying attention. There was no accident, just deception.
Для современных ПВО России дозвуковой "Томагавк" - лёгкая цель. Ещё в СССР были разработаны несколько видов сверхзвуковых крылатых противокорабельных ракет, летящих на предельно малой высоте ("Гранит", "Москит",...) - их сбить гораздо трудней. Сейчас у России появились на вооружении гиперзвуковые крылатые ракеты "Циркон" - их вообще нечем сбивать.
Cause they like it that way . Not everyone wants your type of life. Some people want a more less controlled life. They can move their tent wherever they want without paying the price tag and taxed associated with that.
Seems big slow and old . Does it have a low yield version that is immune to gps spoofing. If they were so good it would have only needed one or two with a 1 megaton yield
You better make sure the democrats take the house, the senate, and the presidency. Otherwise the Putin-loving MAGA traitors will let Russia take Ukraine and beyond.
When we have fewer and fewer of our Americans wanting to defend our own country against Russia having to support other countries do for us is beneficial.
problem is that Russia it's not menacing the States and a lot of countries around the world need to defend themselves from the States... ...why more than 800 military bases around the world? That's why you ear every time more often "Yanks go home" and mind your own business...
@@buggerlugz6753with 50+ countries including NATO assisting Ukraine, Russians managed to take 18% of Ukraine’s land. I’d say their weapons are working just fine.
Actually there is no curvature of the Earth. Which is why the horizon is always at eye level. And the list goes on, and on, and on,…as to way we know, but not you, we don’t live on a globe. But, please, do go on. 😂
no they have not, they say they are but they are not, they are only faster, not manouvrable at closing in on target, easy to shotdown. ruSSians are overselling their weapons as allways, dont buy it bro
Yes Russia has super sonic ballistic missile that are far easier to shoot down because of their trajectory. Also Russia can’t hit anything specific except by dumb luck. They are about as accurate as the ally’s WW2 bombing.
There is only a tiny problem: Right now, Russia has some legendary weapons, too. Yes, those who can fly with Mach 10 (7673 miles per hour, 3430 meters per second)
Yes but they are super expensive and now harder to make then ever and they dont have nearly as many. USA lies about its inventory and thank god because it and there allies need more because of russia.
Russia don't even need to call for the hyper-sonic to compare... "Tomahawk and Kalibr cruise missiles are both long-range, precision-guided weapons used by the military for a variety of missions. The Tomahawk is an American missile that has been in service since the 1980s and can be launched from ships or submarines. It has a range of up to 1,500 miles and carries either conventional or nuclear warheads. The Kalibr is a Russian missile that was first deployed in 2012 and can also be launched from ships or submarines. It has a range of up to 2,000 miles with conventional warheads but can reach 3,000 miles when carrying nuclear payloads. Both missiles have proven effective at their intended targets but the longer range offered by the Kalibr gives it an edge over its American counterpart when it comes to striking distant targets quickly and accurately without putting personnel at risk." By Robert D. Maldonado
nah. russia has been told if it launches or threatens to launch its nukes the whereabouts of Putin and his family are known at all times and they would be nuked in return. Putin values his family more than anything. how is Putin going to access his billions in the camen islands?
Operative word is "could". But like all supposed "game changing" weapons it won't do a damn thing. Russia is way ahead of you on in almost every sphere of military development. This is because in the US militarism and all development around it is focused more on being a money-making venture. The more obscenely expensive bits of kit they can turn out and charge the taxpayer for, the better. And every bit of whatever it makes has to be used overseas. All of Russia's development is home-grown, totally focused on its own defence and is a matter of national survival against the aspirations of corrupt lunatics. Might seem like a small point but the ethos differs completely. The US his new experienced invasion on its own ground. Russia has, multiple times. And importantly, most people have no appreciation of Russia's geography and shear size. In one country, you can drive almost 1/3 of the way around the planet.
@@Asymmetrical-SagginYeah only one person throwing cope around there buddy…Russia’s missile tech is way ahead of ours in the west and they also produce more of them. Let’s be clear, there’s a reason they were the US’s taxi service for the ISS for years - their rocket engines just work, and work well. It’s a problem that the US is addressing far, far too slowly. They had 4 hypersonic missile programs underway however dropped one late last year, so the remaining 3 had better deliver the goods, otherwise the solution is years off. Here in Australia we’re tied to the US apron strings, so I don’t feel particularly confident that we have a strong defense plan in the event of a regional conflict in the Asia Pacific.
I love my Jackie and our little dog. I love my sister though she pisses me off .I love the sunset on a spring day. I love my friends. I love our Lord who still loves though I'm am such a wrech; that is you answer.
The Kamikaze was the inspiration for the Tomahawk cruise missile? I can’t buy that! The first cruise missile I’m aware of is the German V-1. Now that would have a more direct link. Hey, maybe they combined the idea of the Japanese Baka bomb and the V-1, took the human out and created the Tomahawk. 😂
He wasn't referring to the Japanese planes. He was referring to how the weapon was guided. The German rockets were not guided whatsoever. They were more like a point and shoot bullet that came down when the fuel ran out and gravity guided them down. The idea for the tomahawk, inspired by the kamikaze, was to have a homing system vs a human being.
@ Fritz (and Hs 293) may be good examples. Certainly with the radio-guided joysticks. Still, they had poor track records with a success rate of approximately only 20 percent. As Allied forces became more familiar with this technology, they introduced radio jammers to thwart the controller’s inputs, thus they were limited in effectiveness and easily countered The V1? Not so much. Because of the rather crude method of the V1 for calculating the impact point by the number of revolutions of a small propeller, the Germans could not use the V-1 as a precision weapon, nor could they determine the actual impact point in order to make course corrections for subsequent flights. In fact, the British publicized inaccurate information on impact points, causing the Germans to adjust their preflight calculations erroneously. As a result, V-1s often fell well short of their intended targets. Kamikazes scored 121 hits-a success rate of more than 34 percent.
Your title is absurd, these missiles travel far too slow and are too easily intercepted by modern counter measures. Hypersonics are the technology that is feared these days not these antiques.
LOL! What a piece of click bait tripe. These things are seriously old school only useful against beduin and unarmed villagers which of course is what it was used for the past 20 years. No the Khnizal on the other hand is something WE should ALL be worried about.....
You don‘t need GPS only … the are landmarks too you can use to find your target. The Taurus from Germany uses 3 Typs of Navigation. 1. GPS/ Leonardo 2. Landmarks (big Houses etc) and 3. digital Maps
Not really, it was rumoured that the HIMARS was vurnable to GPS jammers, turned out it only "missed" its targets by few meters, which still get's the job done.
Soviets had a variety of different cruise missiles during the Cold War, KH series that are even today highly effective in the current conflict. And those claims that the US made the first, and only cruise missile are just standard US propaganda about their "superior" weaponry. If US weapons were so good they would not need to lie so much and use sanctions and other bullying tactics as means of persuading other countries to buy them.
@@YMagoulo Russia fought 40 countries in a proxy war for 2 years. Do you want Russia to destroyed all the satellites in space that are providing Ukraine info and GPS. They can do it . They have the S-500 and weaponize space satellites. But that will trigger a nuclear war surely.
I seemed to have missed the part where this legendary weapon could stop Russia in hours.
SPOTLIGHT, If you want to succeed in talking about military tech, DO NOT use absurd headlines to grab viewers.
Tired of the bull crap. To be specific, the nonsensical lack of ANY work ethic. I am an AVID military historical fanatic and this video highlights the "IDIOCRACY " style 😎. CLICK BAIT. JUST SAYING 🤔.
Yeah I have started to list channel's that do this as not to show again.
agreed
@@andrewaustin6369 most of them use Chat GPT to write the script and then use the voice reader to narrate it. Then fill the video with stock video clips. I don't know this one is as bad as some, but it is clickbaity.
I guess the discussion on how these weapons "could stop Russia in Hours" begins at the 8:40 mark.
🤣🤣
Exactly what i was thinking 🤣
Thanks, saved me precious time.
Deep analysis: It is a hidden message or intrusive thoughts about Ukraine war. More specifically, it has mainly something to do with the nuclear warheads, but I guess, CZcams does not allow more direct expression🎉.
I was working in the arms industry at the time Tomahawks came out. They were designed to deliver nuclear weapons. Although there was a conventional warhead option the opinion was no one would fire an expensive missile to deliver a 450kg warhead. Well since we were not in a nuclear war (and still are not) Tomahawks were used to deliver precision warheads on target (probably to save planes and pilots). So they started to be used, more were built and the unit cost dropped.
6:24 Correction: The Royal Navy’s Astute class submarine does not have vertical launch capability. It fires Tomahawk Cruise Missiles through its torpedo tubes.
The Tommahawk is a dam good weapon. Really reliable and hits the target over 96% of the time. It’s not fast but it has up to a 1500 MILE range. That’s incredible range from a cruise missile.
But it is slow. No match for russian Iskander.
At around the 1:30 mark this video makes the claim that cruise missiles, like the Tomahawk, were inspired by Japanese Kamikaze planes. Really? And so modern cruise missiles weren't inspired by Germany's V1 cruise missiles, from WW2 - weapons that predated the Kamikaze tactics?
He wasn't referring to the Japanese planes. He was referring to how the weapon was guided. The German rockets were not effectively guided. The idea for the tomahawk, inspired by the kamikaze, was to have a true, reliable homing system vs a human being.
@@c2jones Really? My understanding was that the V1 were equipped with WW2 style gyroscopes and WW2 era autopilot... the lineal ancestors of the Tercom in the pre-GPS Tomahawk
@@geoswan4984
I think the narrator's comments, based up the designers of the original tomahawk, was emphasizing efficacy and accuracy.
Because of the rather crude method of the V1 for calculating the impact point by the number of revolutions of a small propeller, the Germans could not use the V-1 as a precision weapon, nor could they determine the actual impact point in order to make course corrections for subsequent flights.
In fact, the British publicized inaccurate information on impact points, causing the Germans to adjust their preflight calculations erroneously. As a result, V-1s often fell well short of their intended targets.
Kamikazes scored 121 hits-a success rate of more than 34 percent.
this was just more crap being sprouted !
@@geoswan4984 There was a London born Nazi pigeon strapped in it, with sensors to head movements.
Hawks are good weapons, but not infallible. They fly slow enough to get shot down. Not an easy task, but anti air systems keep getting better.
As a skydiver ... even flying slow and stright. I cant belive how accurate german flak cannons were in ww2. Lob a shell so far into the sky and hit a moveing target or have enuff cannons to hit close enuff. Thats crazzy. I try to understand it all but its alot for me to learn.
If we gave 200 to Ukraine,Russia would let 200 hit their target. That would stop the oil; and gas business in Russia,no more revenue, no fuel for tanks planes and rail. It would slow the Russians to a complete stop.
Russian air defense has been orders of magnitude worse than any pre war estimates. It is like the West is encouraging Russia to keep invading, for some unknown reason. most likely European leaders are corrupted by Russian fossil fuel money.
Yeah but the way the US uses assumes a high loss rate. They usually fire a lot of tomahawks at once. When we hit Syria in 2017, I think we fired 60 and that was against an inferior air defense. I would imagine a US attack against Russia would be much larger and wouldn’t be alone. Of course that how nuclear wars start
Well, the unique thing with a Tomahawk is it's ability to fly really low, officially sub 100ft, but it's no secret that it can manage down to 75ft. Combine that with a RCS of under 0.5m2, half a person - then it's not visible on radar, Hitting something with that size, 25m up in the air travellings at 550mph. Using Flak. Good luck.
@orvarino who said anything about flak? Missles are most often shot down by other Missles, planes, rapid fire guns like Phalanx etc. Flak is not common these days.
I’ve been in a building that was hit with a tomahawk during the “shock and awe” campaign of the Iraq war. That place was absolutely destroyed.
Now GPS is the weakpoint because of jammer. They should switch back to image recognition.
The tomahawk is older tech, there are newer better missiles now. Still viable for swarm effect attacks.
In WWII a new weapon Kamikaze, good job they had a New Weapon RADAR. And also proximity fuzes. Plus loads of anti air.
I love it when I actually learn something new and you did a good job
At this point Russia could be stopped by a Girl Scout troop armed with Mint Milano cookies
Was on the Trident missile program. The Beast.
Hmm, I don’t see a connection with kamikaze, the tomahawk has its design dna more closely related to the german v1 self propelled guided bomb, which used pulse get engine and mechanical gyroscopic guidance, v1’s reigned terror over london during ww2 until British fighter interceptors developed strategies to catch them by diving from high altitude and tipping the off course using their wings, a highly dangerous manoeuvre but safer than trying to shoot them down and being engulfed by the explosion and shrapnel. The v1 was attributed to be the first cruise missile.
100 meters above the ground? That’s still too high. The sea launched variant could fly 50 feet above the water. The land attack versions depending on the terrain can fly 100 feet above the ground.
Drooling over weapons does not make you a tough guy, just an A-H.
The tomahawk is only legendary against countries which don't have any Air Defence
or electronic warfare capabilities
Yes,and Russia tops the list of countries with no air defense whatsoever. The Europeans throw up the white flag as usual. The French could stop them cold if they sent their antiquated aircraft, but we know they talk a big game, and do less than any European country except Luxenberg.
@@paulbedichek5177lol you’re funny. 🤡
@@paulbedichek5177 You are delusional
They did pretty will in the opening moments of Desert Storm while the Iraqis still had one of the most sophisticated air defense systems in the world, built by the Russians........
Change title to: This Legendary Weapon Could Kill Russia Laughing
Tomahawks are GPS-guided and therefore susceptible für GPS-jamming. INS can take over for a short period of time, but the weapon looses a significant amount of accuracy. Russia's EW-capabilities have been significantly improved, therefore all GSSN-guided western weapons loose their effectiveness. Next generation of navigation is AI-targeting from all sort of sensors, where China is the leading nation.
My hometown had the guidance system production facility. comforting to know that it was a primary nuke target...🤣🤣
Nothing can stop Russia. Period.
subsonic and gps tracking can get these down super easy
The V1 cruise missile was used by the Germans in WW2
Currently no longer a major threat to modern air defense. Like many American weapons, the system has simply not been renewed for too long.
Doubt it. They don’t make game changers like they used to.
In the Late 50's to 1975 the B-52's carried 2 AGM28B's Nuke Cruis missles. 650 NM range @1200 mph og 600 mph down low, 1.1 Mega Ton. Today the carry 20 AGM86's Nukes Ad Non Nuks. and the work. Don't know how well the HOUND DOG did Never had to LAUNCH in a real WAR. Thank your/my GOD.
So this is why Hubble maped the entire earth brdore Nasa claimed that someone had made a mistake and made the lease convex instead of concave and then used the space shuttle to replace the huge lenses to concave so it could see the stars. The military has often funded nasa projects so that military hardware can be taken into space without us knowing about it. It seemed very odd at the time when nasa said that the wrong shaped lens had been sent into space because it cost about a billion dollars at the time to make it. Replacing it later so that it could do the job nasa wanted, instead of the military need made perfect sense to anyone paying attention. There was no accident, just deception.
a friend of mine worked on the hubble, where did you confirm your statement?
I wonder what the atomic payload specs are for the Current Tomahawk?
They cant be intercepted? the kalibre is faster in terminal tsage but gets intercepted by anti air missiles
Didnt you the bit in Top Gun where the air boss says " this will be all over in two minutes " hours will be far too late !
Для современных ПВО России дозвуковой "Томагавк" - лёгкая цель. Ещё в СССР были разработаны несколько видов сверхзвуковых крылатых противокорабельных ракет, летящих на предельно малой высоте ("Гранит", "Москит",...) - их сбить гораздо трудней. Сейчас у России появились на вооружении гиперзвуковые крылатые ракеты "Циркон" - их вообще нечем сбивать.
Someone just creates futuristic graphics here and every US fanboy clicks on it and immediately gets a drooling mouth.....
Gamechanger, yes. We already had many of these, didn't change anything.
Can you make one with a top hellicopter wing?
Boys and their outdated toys, yesterdays Tech.
Three of these will bankrupt a given country.
BALLS OUT! - is what I think of it.
❤❤❤the return message my even more destructive ❤❤❤
incorrect description of DSMAC and Tercom use. yes today GPS is a primary nav tool for modern Tomahawks,
Each tomahawk missile requires 480 ounces of silver....
"Inspired by kamakaze planes?" Out of who's a** did you pull THAT one?
Vodka bomb?? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Vi skulle väl behöva några på Gotland och några i Tornedalen in Sweden
Now you realize why Russia would never allow UKRAINE in NATO. Right???
many among the neocons don't seem to have realised that !
Why don't Raytheon do something useful like making shelters for American rough sleepers.
Its not Raytheon job to fix democrats moronic policies
@elizabethtamp1537 YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Or, you could solve your societal issues and not have rough sleepers.
Cause they like it that way . Not everyone wants your type of life. Some people want a more less controlled life. They can move their tent wherever they want without paying the price tag and taxed associated with that.
Seems big slow and old . Does it have a low yield version that is immune to gps spoofing. If they were so good it would have only needed one or two with a 1 megaton yield
Subsonic cruise missiles have no luck against S400 Russian anti-missile systems.
points off for clickbate photo.
The narration is vintage 1970's. Sounds like somebody's grandpa.
Don,t let Ukraine down please.
It was not Russia that forced Mexico or Canada to fight the United States, but the United States that forced Urkaina to fight Russia
If you’re talking to the Republicans, you’re better off talking to the dirt.
You better make sure the democrats take the house, the senate, and the presidency. Otherwise the Putin-loving MAGA traitors will let Russia take Ukraine and beyond.
When we have fewer and fewer of our Americans wanting to defend our own country against Russia having to support other countries do for us is beneficial.
problem is that Russia it's not menacing the States and a lot of countries around the world need to defend themselves from the States...
...why more than 800 military bases around the world? That's why you ear every time more often "Yanks go home" and mind your own business...
“The legendary weapon that could stop Russia in hours” Does that include stopping Russia from launching its nuclear arsenal?
No need to worry, they probably won't work anyway...
NO. It seems that western leaders are getting more and more closer to Armageddon.
definitely not - just more crappola !
@@buggerlugz6753with 50+ countries including NATO assisting Ukraine, Russians managed to take 18% of Ukraine’s land. I’d say their weapons are working just fine.
Russia did use nukes if they territory is invaded, and Ukraine (1991 bordsers) is clearly NOT russia...
A modern V1
Swiftie Sharp:)
It couldn't.
Nothing will stop Russia😎
More hype than substance. The other aspect is that all the launch platforms immediately become targets.
Unlike ragg hedds Russians can fight back with modern weapons FAFO
Russia has the same weapons,
Actually there is no curvature of the Earth. Which is why the horizon is always at eye level. And the list goes on, and on, and on,…as to way we know, but not you, we don’t live on a globe. But, please, do go on. 😂
That’s right we don’t live on a globe, we live on a planet, the globe is just an instrument that represents the planet, you back on course?
Absurd headline.
what a load of garbage..
The cow "could" jump over the moon. 😂😂😂
All good and dandy but the tomahawk is not supersonic. Rusia has supersonic weapons.
no they have not, they say they are but they are not, they are only faster, not manouvrable at closing in on target, easy to shotdown. ruSSians are overselling their weapons as allways, dont buy it bro
Yes Russia has super sonic ballistic missile that are far easier to shoot down because of their trajectory. Also Russia can’t hit anything specific except by dumb luck. They are about as accurate as the ally’s WW2 bombing.
Hyper sonic is not the end all....,some times a slow weapon will get through
And?
Russia has 2x better one
Thanks, SPOTLIGHT.
it would destroy Russia in one day ?! ..... i don't think so !
There is only a tiny problem: Right now, Russia has some legendary weapons, too. Yes, those who can fly with Mach 10 (7673 miles per hour, 3430 meters per second)
Yes but they are super expensive and now harder to make then ever and they dont have nearly as many. USA lies about its inventory and thank god because it and there allies need more because of russia.
With their speed record ?
@@agnelomascarenhas8990 - - 10 Mach was the confirmed, measured speed. Occasionally, the Russian propaganda claims 20 Mach.
Russia don't even need to call for the hyper-sonic to compare...
"Tomahawk and Kalibr cruise missiles are both long-range, precision-guided weapons used by the military for a variety of missions.
The Tomahawk is an American missile that has been in service since the 1980s and can be launched from ships or submarines.
It has a range of up to 1,500 miles and carries either conventional or nuclear warheads.
The Kalibr is a Russian missile that was first deployed in 2012 and can also be launched from ships or submarines.
It has a range of up to 2,000 miles with conventional warheads but can reach 3,000 miles when carrying nuclear payloads.
Both missiles have proven effective at their intended targets but the longer range offered by the Kalibr gives it an edge over its American counterpart when it comes to striking distant targets quickly and accurately without putting personnel at risk."
By Robert D. Maldonado
But do any of them really work? anyone trained in how to use them? Russia is a "paper Tiger" they prove it every day in Ukraine..
Old concept...Russia, France, Gb have better assets
Too easy to intercept, too slow, too costly per units, too low production capacity.
"STOP RUSSIA IN HOURS"😂😂😂🚮
Do you want Russia to launch their nukes? Because this is how you get Russia to launch their nukes...
Putin is stupid,but he isn’t crazy. . . .
nah. russia has been told if it launches or threatens to launch its nukes the whereabouts of Putin and his family are known at all times and they would be nuked in return. Putin values his family more than anything. how is Putin going to access his billions in the camen islands?
Operative word is "could".
But like all supposed "game changing" weapons it won't do a damn thing.
Russia is way ahead of you on
in almost every sphere of military development.
This is because in the US militarism and all development around it is focused more on being a money-making venture.
The more obscenely expensive bits of kit they can turn out and charge the taxpayer for, the better.
And every bit of whatever it makes has to be used overseas.
All of Russia's development is home-grown, totally focused on its own defence and is a matter of national survival against the aspirations of corrupt lunatics.
Might seem like a small point but the ethos differs completely.
The US his new experienced invasion on its own ground.
Russia has, multiple times.
And importantly, most people have no appreciation of Russia's geography and shear size.
In one country, you can drive almost 1/3 of the way around the planet.
Like all trolls, your grammar is almost as poor as your logic. They obviously select from kindergartens.
But the US doesn't want Russia defeated. Otherwise, it would supply such weapons to Ukraine.
to this weapon russia has an antidote ...plus .... it just launced 2 new weapons like this just recently.
🥱
slama ukraina@@denniscrane9753
Lol shit prob dont even work. Filler prob replaced with dirt. Ruzz trying to cope each and every way they can 😂😂😂😂
@@Asymmetrical-SagginYeah only one person throwing cope around there buddy…Russia’s missile tech is way ahead of ours in the west and they also produce more of them. Let’s be clear, there’s a reason they were the US’s taxi service for the ISS for years - their rocket engines just work, and work well. It’s a problem that the US is addressing far, far too slowly. They had 4 hypersonic missile programs underway however dropped one late last year, so the remaining 3 had better deliver the goods, otherwise the solution is years off. Here in Australia we’re tied to the US apron strings, so I don’t feel particularly confident that we have a strong defense plan in the event of a regional conflict in the Asia Pacific.
Righto, troll, whatever......
gamechanger
I love my Jackie and our little dog. I love my sister though she pisses me off .I love the sunset on a spring day. I love my friends. I love our Lord who still loves though I'm am such a wrech; that is you answer.
why didnt stop houthis ?
Hooties are very naughty they ignore rules , they are little blighters
What will be the range of an electric Tomahawk? We have to fight climate change 😊
Good video, but kind of click baitish.
Only weapon that would achieve that is nuclear. Ridiculous title.
No it couldn't too slow against hypersonic weapons.
GPS becomes useless with commonly used Russian GPS jamming systems. Misleading title for a rather outdated weapon.
This Video ist produced with AI.
Are you sure?
Hollywood
AI generated guff.
LOLLLLL
why not? nobody listens to you? why not?
The Kamikaze was the inspiration for the Tomahawk cruise missile? I can’t buy that! The first cruise missile I’m aware of is the German V-1. Now that would have a more direct link. Hey, maybe they combined the idea of the Japanese Baka bomb and the V-1, took the human out and created the Tomahawk. 😂
He wasn't referring to the Japanese planes. He was referring to how the weapon was guided. The German rockets were not guided whatsoever. They were more like a point and shoot bullet that came down when the fuel ran out and gravity guided them down. The idea for the tomahawk, inspired by the kamikaze, was to have a homing system vs a human being.
@@c2jones more like a German fritz and a v1
@
Fritz (and Hs 293) may be good examples. Certainly with the radio-guided joysticks. Still, they had poor track records with a success rate of approximately only 20 percent. As Allied forces became more familiar with this technology, they introduced radio jammers to thwart the controller’s inputs, thus they were limited in effectiveness and easily countered
The V1? Not so much.
Because of the rather crude method of the V1 for calculating the impact point by the number of revolutions of a small propeller, the Germans could not use the V-1 as a precision weapon, nor could they determine the actual impact point in order to make course corrections for subsequent flights.
In fact, the British publicized inaccurate information on impact points, causing the Germans to adjust their preflight calculations erroneously. As a result, V-1s often fell well short of their intended targets.
Kamikazes scored 121 hits-a success rate of more than 34 percent.
You are the only smart one so far in this chat feed!@@c2jones
Your title is absurd, these missiles travel far too slow and are too easily intercepted by modern counter measures. Hypersonics are the technology that is feared these days not these antiques.
Obsolete!
Make me😂
LOL! What a piece of click bait tripe. These things are seriously old school only useful against beduin and unarmed villagers which of course is what it was used for the past 20 years. No the Khnizal on the other hand is something WE should ALL be worried about.....
"We".......said the Russian troll pretending to be a westerner.
Russia has been blocking GPS signals in Eastern Europe of late. It could be a problem for such weapons
most definitely !
You don‘t need GPS only … the are landmarks too you can use to find your target. The Taurus from Germany uses 3 Typs of Navigation. 1. GPS/ Leonardo 2. Landmarks (big Houses etc) and 3. digital Maps
Not really, it was rumoured that the HIMARS was vurnable to GPS jammers, turned out it only "missed" its targets by few meters, which still get's the job done.
Dreadful history. USA took German V-1. They produced SNARK, MATADOR, MACE. Nothing from Japan. Very poor History.
Soviets had a variety of different cruise missiles during the Cold War, KH series that are even today highly effective in the current conflict. And those claims
that the US made the first, and only cruise missile are just standard US propaganda about their "superior" weaponry. If US weapons were so good they would not
need to lie so much and use sanctions and other bullying tactics as means of persuading other countries to buy them.
Talk is cheap, the fact is Russia is starting year 3 trying to subjugate Ukraine. Don't you think they should start using their superior weaponry?
@@YMagouloThey are saving them for you. No poker player reveals her cards until necessary - read Sun Tzu it's all in there.
NONE of any soviet technology compares to the United States.
Allow me to repeat: NONE of their junk is close to what we are doing. ❤🤍💙
@@elizabethtamp1537 Russia wouldn’t dare provoking NATO, it would be the end of Russia, they wouldn’t last a month in a conventional war with NATO.
@@YMagoulo Russia fought 40 countries in a proxy war for 2 years. Do you want Russia to destroyed all the satellites in space that are providing Ukraine info and GPS.
They can do it . They have the S-500 and weaponize space satellites.
But that will trigger a nuclear war surely.
🐲
The Tomahawk -was the legendary US missile the Soviet Union feared most !
lol