My Heritage DNA Results - Cappadocia Turkey
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- Gedmatch Results:
MDLP K16:
Admix Results (sorted):
Population Percent
1 Caucasian 47.48
2 Steppe 12.78
3 Neolithic 12.17
4 Indian 7.74
5 NearEast 6.48
6 Siberian 4.11
7 NorthEastEuropean 4.00
8 SouthEastAsian 3.40
9 Amerindian 1.85
Using 1 population approximation:
1 Azerbaijani_Agdzhabedi_Azerbaijan_Agdzhabedi @ 5.219006
2 Turk_Adana @ 5.523401
3 Azerbaijani_Azerbaijan @ 5.572066
4 Circassian_Circassia @ 6.518677
5 Turk_Kayseri @ 6.567706
6 Kabardin_Kabardino-Balkaria @ 6.735554
7 Azerbaijani_Khachmaz_Azerbaijan_Khachmaz @ 6.763744
8 Turk_Istanbul @ 6.939413
9 Armenian_Chambarak @ 7.521184
10 Azeri_Azerbaijan @ 8.028924
11 Armenian_Armenia @ 8.082534
12 Armenian_Erzrum @ 8.272262
13 Greek_Azov @ 8.297647
14 Turk_Aydin @ 8.344426
15 Armenian_Yegvard @ 8.474519
16 Armenian_Dprabak @ 8.802045
17 Armenian_Martuni @ 8.888431
18 Ossetian_North_Ossetia @ 8.964654
19 Azerbaijani_Dagestan_Azerbaijan_Dagestan @ 9.044636
20 Azerbaijani_Dagestan_Azerbaijan_Dagestan @ 9.099545
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Circassian_Circassia +50% Turk_Adana @ 3.156383
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Armenian_Lebanon +25% Azerbaijani_Khachmaz_Azerbaijan_Khachmaz +25% Nogai_Dagestan @ 2.455986
Using 4 populations approximation:
1 Armenian_Lebanon + Jew_Iraqi + Nogai_Dagestan + Kumyk_Stalskoe @ 2.260947
2 Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Jew_Kurdish + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Turkey @ 2.359171
3 Armenian_Lebanon + Kurd_Syria + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Kayseri @ 2.386340
4 Balkar_Kabardino-Balkaria + Greek_Greece + Jew_Iraqi + Turkmens_Turkmenistan @ 2.401675
5 Armenian_Armenia + Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Georgian_Kakheti + Lipka_Tatar_Belorus @ 2.415300
6 Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Jew_Kurdish + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Istanbul @ 2.422207
7 Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Greek_Azov + Jew_Kurdish + Nogai_Dagestan @ 2.423885
8 Balkar_Kabardino-Balkaria + Greek_Greece + Jew_Iran + Turkmens_Turkmenistan @ 2.425266
9 Assyrian_Armenia + Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Georgian_Kakheti + Lipka_Tatar_Belorus @ 2.430679
10 Armenian_Armenia + Armenian_Yerevan + Georgian_Kakheti + Lipka_Tatar_Belorus @ 2.432709
11 Armenian_Armenia + Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Lipka_Tatar_Belorus @ 2.437157
12 Armenian_Martuni + Armenian_Armenia + Georgian_Kakheti + Lipka_Tatar_Belorus @ 2.438219
13 Armenian_Gavar + Armenian_Armenia + Georgian_Kakheti + Lipka_Tatar_Belorus @ 2.444188
14 Armenian_Armenia + Turk_Turkey + Turk_Kayseri + Turkmens_Turkmenistan @ 2.448526
15 Armenian_Lebanon + Azeri_Azerbaijan + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Kayseri @ 2.451523
16 Armenian_Armenia + Kurd_Syria + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Turkey @ 2.452495
17 Armenian_Lebanon + Armenian_Lebanon + Azerbaijani_Khachmaz_Azerbaijan_Khachmaz + Nogai_Dagestan @ 2.455986
18 Armenian_Armenia + Armenian_Armenia + Turk_Turkey + Turkmens_Turkmenistan @ 2.458672
19 Assyrian_Armavir + Georgian_Abkhazia_Abkhazia + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Turkey @ 2.460480
20 Armenian_Armenia + Kurd_Syria + Nogai_Dagestan + Turk_Kayseri @ 2.460620
---------
EUROGENES K13:
Admix Results (sorted):
Population Percent
1 West_Asian 29.69
2 East_Med 27.72
3 West_Med 10.87
4 Baltic 8.17
5 North_Atlantic 7.20
6 Siberian 4.66
7 East_Asian 3.86
8 South_Asian 3.48
9 Red_Sea 2.88
10 Amerindian 1.49
Using 1 population approximation:
1 Turkish @ 5.568268
2 Azeri @ 9.190577
3 Kurdish @ 15.129911
4 Turkmen @ 15.761363
5 Georgian_Jewish @ 15.817160
6 Armenian @ 15.902894
7 Iranian @ 16.208401
8 Kumyk @ 16.530581
9 Assyrian @ 16.738800
10 Lebanese_Muslim @ 18.898384
11 Iranian_Jewish @ 19.629494
12 Kurdish_Jewish @ 19.977289
13 Syrian @ 20.157465
14 Balkar @ 20.845455
15 Cyprian @ 21.236500
16 Adygei @ 21.494888
17 Central_Greek @ 21.587200
18 Kabardin @ 22.053772
19 Nogay @ 22.503765
20 East_Sicilian @ 22.578289
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Turkish +50% Turkish @ 5.568268
Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Cyprian +25% Lezgin +25% Nogay @ 3.257824
Here are my results according to Anchestry DNA:
drive.google.com/file/d/1waJCTGUbyv_LtfBngXOGXC89b5pxbZjl/view
Ancestry DNA kadar kötü bir şirket yok sanırım
Slaughtcount 22 aynen
Yari iranli oldugunu gösteriyor dogrumu ben öyle anladim
ancestory was innacurate
Wow only 2% turkic mongol 🦃 🇲🇳 for a turkish
I am Greek but i must admit... The music for the western Asia and Central Asia regions are THE BEST. I mean... Totally superior to European music's, including the one for the Greek region
My opinion is that Yemenite Jewish has the best music of all 🙂
Nepal is the best for me
@@EAGLE----1 (note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
@Cansu Джансу the balkan music is so touching
i prefer irani jew
Wow native American!, that's cool
That's just an error or related to the central asians
@@ManiyaVinas It's not a mistake, Turks migrated to America through the Bering Strait.
gördüğüm en cool dna sonucu :D
Yunan yüzdesi mi bu fikri verdi sana
Greetings from 27.2%
Aziz Yigido lol
George Delorean lol
salute
From history
@Kerem cope bitch
i am turkish, I have 33%West Asian, 30%Greek, 20%Middle East, 15%Central Asia and 2%Italian.
That means you are only 15% Turk
@@harrank2786
“Previous genetic studies have generally used Turks as representatives of ancient Anatolians. Our results show that Turks are genetically shifted towards Central Asians, a pattern consistent with a history of mixture with populations from this region. These diversity patterns observed in the PCA motivated formal testing of admixture in Armenians and other regional populations.”
www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/18/015396.full.pdf
“In addition, although some degree of genetic continuity could be expected in Anatolia (i.e. in modern Turks), it should be noted that modern Turks are a hybrid population, comprising of the original Anatolian stock, Turkic people (i.e. of Central Asian ancestry). This is surely reflected in the modern Turkish Y-DNA”
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179474
The weight for the migration event predicted to originate from the branch ancestral to East Asia into current-day Turkey was 0.217 (21.7%). Although this implies a major population event from the East to West Asia, we note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates. First, the original contributing populations to the ancestral population in Turkey are not known. For instance, we do not know the exact genetic relationship between current-day East Asian populations and the Turkic speakers from Central Asia who migrated into Anatolia about 1,000 years before present.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236450/
(Note:%21.7 doesn’t mean %21.7 Turk because first Turks were %40-45 east eurasian not %100 so it means %50 Turk by blood)
abload.de/img/untitled-1b3k6r.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/747058885797347388/747081098621616188/74270248_151753982884837_667409747107905536_n.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/746376025944096778/784377847082647582/unknown.png
DNA from a 2,000-year-old burial site in Mongolia has revealed new information about the Xiongnu, a nomadic tribe that once reigned in Central Asia. Researchers in France studied DNA from more than 62 skeletons to reconstruct the history and social organization of a long-forgotten culture. Skeletons from the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day Turkey. This supports other studies indicating that Turkish tribes originated at least in part in Mongolia at the end of the Xiongnu period.
www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_03/ancient.shtml
The people of modern-day Iran and Turkey trace their genetic heritage to the ancient Persians and the Turkic ethnic people, respectively.
www.myheritage.com.tr/ethnicities/broadly-west-asian/ethnicity-worldwide-distribution
Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/G25_PCA_East_Mediterranean.png_-_Anatolia_and_the_surrounding.png
Some malevolent people or people who do not know enough about the subject try to exaggerate the rate of Turks and Armenians in Anatolia. For example, it is possible to encounter people who claim that approximately 50% of Anatolian Turks are of Greek or Armenian origin. However, when the Ottoman Tahrir registers belonging to the years 1520-1530 are examined, it is concretely revealed that even 93% of the Anatolian people belonged to Turkmen tribes and communities. The non-Muslim population ratio of approximately 10% has remained at the same rates in the last periods of the Ottoman Empire. In some parts of Anatolia, with the effect of Islamization, a small number of indigenous people, who were Muslims, were dissolved in the Turks. Moreover relocation and exchange with the separated Greeks and Armenians from Turkey Turkey genetic structure is completely different from the Turks. Although there was a partial change in the demographic structure of eastern Anatolia with the settlement of Kurds in Eastern Anatolia in the 16th century, it was easier for Muslim Turks and Kurds to merge in that region. Since the 19th century, a significant portion of non-Muslim immigration that took place in Turkey Turks (Caucasus and Balkan Turks) reccommended. These also partially affected the existing population and genetic structure.
As a result, his "ethnic Turks", "Turkmen" or "nomads" as a defining Turkey Turkey genetically Central Asians (Turkmenistan) seems to be quite close to the Turkmens. Turkey is quite obvious they resemble each other in the middle compared the genetic structure of Turkish and Turkmen. Turks and Turkmens belong to the Oghuzs in the historical process and show similarities with each other, both in terms of language, culture or ethnicity. you maintain genetic and historical research, Turkey shows that the Turkmen origin, in other words, the Turkish Anatolian Turks.
www.haplogruplar.com/turkiye-turklerinin-orta-asyali-turkmenlerle-genetik-akrabaligi/
@@papazataklaattiranimam Wrong wrong wrong . Turks are Central Asian and we all know that.
@@caglarates4541 no only 15% central Asian Turkic. West Asia aren’t Turkic.
@@harrank2786 %40 Turkic according to Vahaduo. Myheritage is inaccurate
Asıl sorun bu şirketdeki batı asya sonucunun o bölgeye mensup olan ya da orda yaşayan her etnik toplumu aynı çatının altına almasından kaynaklı. Dolayısıyla o oranın kısmen/tamamen nerden ve hangi milletten geldiğine dair hiç bir net bilgi vermediği için kesin birşey söyleyemeyiz. Bu grubun içinde oğuzlardan tut her türlü kavimden var. ilkin bunları teker teker birbirinden ayırmaları gerek ki iyi anlayıp ona göre eleştirelim.
@Demet Ramos hadi oradan rum kabilesiymiş orada iranlılardan tut gürcüsüne kadar çeşit çeşit millet var
Whatehat
@@metintanpnar8782 Myhertiage de Kuzey Kafkasya'yı da kapsıyormuş batı asya
batı asyanın içerisine iranlılar, kafkasyalılar da girdiğinden rum diyip geçemezsin kardeşim. antik kavimlerden başla ki buralar medeniyetin doğduğu yerler; hititler, frigler, asurlar, urartular, persler, makedonyalılar(grekler), daha sonraları ermeniler, kürtler, daha sonra romalılar(ki orada romalılaşıyor halk), daha sonraları araplar, türkler(ki orada türkleşiyor halk), moğollar, diğer kafkasyalılar. karman çorman olmuş buralar.
sıkıntı şu; safkan gen bulunamıyor ki adamlar net tanımlama yapsın. west asia diyip geçmek zorundalar çünkü west asia'nın gerçek bir sahibi yok. neyin üzerinden sistemlerine tanımlama yapacaklar?
@@metintanpnar8782 Aynen her türde etnik grubu kapsamakta. Yunanlılarla sınırlı değil ki orası artık. Ona bakılırsa Türklerimiz her yöne doğru yayılmış. Kabileyi ortaya çıktığı bölgeye göre sınıflandırmak saçma.
I mean this is amazing
Ataların kızıldereli keşke bendede çıksaydı..
ablacım ataları kızıl derili falan değil. bu illustrative harita ve isimlendirmeler tamamen yanlış. harita ile değil sonuçları iyi şekilde bilen birinin elinde milletinizi öğrenebilirsiniz
Bukarı fazla kızılderiler nerden senin atan oluyor Afrikalılar deseydim biraz inanırdım onlar gerçek türkürler kızıldereliler biraz fazla uzakta kalıyorlar
dang, you have the same amount of native american blood I do and I am Brazilian...lol
Wow. I'm Brazilian, but you're more "South American" than me. See my results...
It is because the native population of the Americas have migrated there from East Asia, where the early Turkic people originate. Since Turks have a small portion of East Asian ancestry that comes from their Turkic origins, it is completely normal.
@@bu9657 It makes sense.
@farus killer This is actually an error. It is probably because of the historic connection between the Asiatic and Native American people. So, since it is an error, not all people have that result.
@chika Fujiwara Native American, Siberian Turkic,Turkmen and Uyghur Turkic are same nation,the real proof Q haplogroup
Türksün ama oranın yerlilerini karışmış gibi klasik Anadolu türküsün kısaca
hadi lan ordan
Yok çocuk da baya gerçek oghuz türkü genler kalmış bu zamana kadar çünkü Myheritage sadece en son 300 yılın DNA si gösteriyor. Birde şu var cok eski atalar genler git gide azalıyor. Yani türkler anadoluşiyor indo european.
@@FreePalestine711 myheritage 1000 seneye kadar iniyor.
@̊ ̊ yuh semitleride türk yapicak. Astfurullah Allah türktur deseniz şaşırmam
@@tirkooo biz arap dinine inanmıyoruz .
I also have native american dna.How is this possible?Are central asians and native americans are relative?
10% Ural-Altai amazing.
What do you mean 10% Ural-Altai he got more than that XD.
He's only 9.8% turkic
@@physicspectrum16 Why call me dickhead? Is it because your mad???
@@physicspectrum16 I’m not even Turk xd.
@@osirisunderworlddweller3868 where are you from
63% native Anatolian, 27% Greek, 7% Turkic, Native American and Mesoamerican are confused Siberian. Cool.
no buddy, not 63% native anatolian. according to my heritage, native anatolian is considered as greek. Is it really hard to read the description of genetic on my heritage website? West asia includes turkmens, caucasian turks and anatolian turks. Lets prove it. Generally Turks have more than 50 west asia and when they uploaded their results to gedmatch. They obtain the closest results and most of them related to caucasian turks, turkmens and uzbeks. My heritage says that west asia is partly turkic, central asia is full turkic. There is no a specific section for these people living in west asian territory. For example, when turks upload their results to gedmatch, they take mostly turkic genes related to at least 50% west asian but when a georgian with 60% west asian upload the result, he/she take highly georgian genes related to 60% west asşian genes. Btw do not trust my heritage because haplogroups are way older than nationalities, for example J2 Y-DNA has thousand of thousand history, we dont even have a clear evidences showing nationalities 10000 years ago but according to my heritage, east mediterrenean is completely given to greeks. Thats why many people take high greek genes. For example, what is albania related to? Illyraians are the one of the oldest nationality in the world but most of the albanians have more than 75% greek according to my heritage, is that make sense? If u say that, greeks mixed with albanians, then why none of u guys have a specific genetic showing your albanian part? I hope u understand buddy, east mediterrenean does not belong to greeks, it belongs to greeks, south native anatolians, phonecians and many more nationalities living in this territory.Turks in turkey do not greek genes, they have native anatolian genes but native anatolian genetic does not exist in my heritage so native anatolians directly is considered part of greeks. This is totaly wrong. It is like thinking of chinese and indians are the same.
@@enjoymfs9715 False. The West Asian of MH are the native populations of Asia minor , Levant , Caucasus and Iran. It is mostly Persian or Persian like DNA. Turkic DNA is the central Asian. Many Turks have a lot of West Asian DNA , because they turkified the native populations of Asia Minor, but in reality it is Persian like DNA. GEDMATCH doesn't analyze the DNA, they only tell in which country live people with similar DNA, different thing.They don't tell you the origin of DNA.
@@jimsullivan6634 could u tell me how Turks were turkified in an Empire Turkic language was not official languages? Official language of Seljuks were persian, official language of ottomans was only 10% Turkish because Ottoman language is about 90% persian arabic mixture. Does it make sense to u? Turks were never colonizers , if Turks were colonizers, then today, Most of the Balkan countries, arabic countries and iran would speak in Turkish but our ancestors chose taking their culture instead of spreading Turkic culture.
@@enjoymfs9715 I think that historians and other relevant scientists have answered to your questions. There is no doubt among historians that Anatolia was Roman (greek speaking and of orthodox christian religion) until 1071 and was gradually turkified until 1923.
What I cannot understand is why you, Turkish people, think that being partially of greco-roman origins is kinda insult... Instead, you should boast about it! And do not forget that those genetic origins are like a "bridge" for the Turkish people with Greek people and other Europeans, who have a roman heritage as well.
Greetings from Greece!
PS: Herod's and Cleopatra's kingdoms (Judaea and Egypt) had as official language the Greek Koine dialect, but common people of lower class would speak their native languages in their everyday lives (aramaic and coptic respectively).
@@enjoymfs9715 After Mustafa Kemal people who were living in Turkey were forced to become Turks.
typical ancient greek dna= greek and half anatolian...he he he
* Italian, not greek
@@LoveAndPeace2004 south Italian is greek so no italian
@@captainjacksparrow370 Well yes, but actually no. South Italy was under not only Greek but, Islamic, Norman and Spanish influence for a long time.
History has shown us that Turks are more successful warriors than Persians and Byzantium, that's why we SEE TURKS SUPERIOR
he is %70 turk
Turkmens in central Asia %27 east eurasian, you are %10. 27/10 Still almost %40 Turkmen. Nice results
Only your fantasy
@@anldincer8811 now send me map shows Pontians all Greek.... Before days says another
@@EAGLE----1 Lol, armenian and Pontic almost same. Maybe %3 greek yes, you are correct :D
@@anldincer8811 only lie, only lie and unhistorical also Out of science
@@EAGLE----1 eksiup.com/p/974213027ta8?del=bWcoKTvMvuF3hYSG2A47yEPf62k9BErd421303
eksiup.com/p/go4212807umw
The closest 2 peoples to you and other Pontus people are Laz and Armenians, the Greeks are far away. But you can't accept it, poor guy
You are Turkish but only have 7% central Asian 😂 Nice results though!
Nazmiye Roshan gedmatch.
Westasya is kurd
@Kerem west asia it's Turkish central asia is
“Previous genetic studies have generally used Turks as representatives of ancient Anatolians. Our results show that Turks are genetically shifted towards Central Asians, a pattern consistent with a history of mixture with populations from this region. These diversity patterns observed in the PCA motivated formal testing of admixture in Armenians and other regional populations.”
www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/18/015396.full.pdf
“In addition, although some degree of genetic continuity could be expected in Anatolia (i.e. in modern Turks), it should be noted that modern Turks are a hybrid population, comprising of the original Anatolian stock, Turkic people (i.e. of Central Asian ancestry). This is surely reflected in the modern Turkish Y-DNA”
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179474
The weight for the migration event predicted to originate from the branch ancestral to East Asia into current-day Turkey was 0.217 (21.7%). Although this implies a major population event from the East to West Asia, we note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates. First, the original contributing populations to the ancestral population in Turkey are not known. For instance, we do not know the exact genetic relationship between current-day East Asian populations and the Turkic speakers from Central Asia who migrated into Anatolia about 1,000 years before present.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236450/
(Note:%21.7 doesn’t mean %21.7 Turk because first Turks were %40-45 east eurasian not %100 so it means %50 Turk by blood)
abload.de/img/untitled-1b3k6r.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/747058885797347388/747081098621616188/74270248_151753982884837_667409747107905536_n.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/746376025944096778/784377847082647582/unknown.png
DNA from a 2,000-year-old burial site in Mongolia has revealed new information about the Xiongnu, a nomadic tribe that once reigned in Central Asia. Researchers in France studied DNA from more than 62 skeletons to reconstruct the history and social organization of a long-forgotten culture. Skeletons from the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day Turkey. This supports other studies indicating that Turkish tribes originated at least in part in Mongolia at the end of the Xiongnu period.
www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_03/ancient.shtml
The people of modern-day Iran and Turkey trace their genetic heritage to the ancient Persians and the Turkic ethnic people, respectively.
www.myheritage.com.tr/ethnicities/broadly-west-asian/ethnicity-worldwide-distribution
Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/G25_PCA_East_Mediterranean.png_-_Anatolia_and_the_surrounding.png
Some malevolent people or people who do not know enough about the subject try to exaggerate the rate of Turks and Armenians in Anatolia. For example, it is possible to encounter people who claim that approximately 50% of Anatolian Turks are of Greek or Armenian origin. However, when the Ottoman Tahrir registers belonging to the years 1520-1530 are examined, it is concretely revealed that even 93% of the Anatolian people belonged to Turkmen tribes and communities. The non-Muslim population ratio of approximately 10% has remained at the same rates in the last periods of the Ottoman Empire. In some parts of Anatolia, with the effect of Islamization, a small number of indigenous people, who were Muslims, were dissolved in the Turks. Moreover relocation and exchange with the separated Greeks and Armenians from Turkey Turkey genetic structure is completely different from the Turks. Although there was a partial change in the demographic structure of eastern Anatolia with the settlement of Kurds in Eastern Anatolia in the 16th century, it was easier for Muslim Turks and Kurds to merge in that region. Since the 19th century, a significant portion of non-Muslim immigration that took place in Turkey Turks (Caucasus and Balkan Turks) reccommended. These also partially affected the existing population and genetic structure.
As a result, his "ethnic Turks", "Turkmen" or "nomads" as a defining Turkey Turkey genetically Central Asians (Turkmenistan) seems to be quite close to the Turkmens. Turkey is quite obvious they resemble each other in the middle compared the genetic structure of Turkish and Turkmen. Turks and Turkmens belong to the Oghuzs in the historical process and show similarities with each other, both in terms of language, culture or ethnicity. you maintain genetic and historical research, Turkey shows that the Turkmen origin, in other words, the Turkish Anatolian Turks.
www.haplogruplar.com/turkiye-turklerinin-orta-asyali-turkmenlerle-genetik-akrabaligi/
@Kerem You are the idiot. I am Central Asian! He is Turkish (from west Asia) and myheritage shows he has a little bit of central Asian in him. What part of what I said did you not get??
Since Turkish people always say they are turkic ( central Asian), I thought the Turkic ancestry would be much more. Check ancestry - he has 2% Mongolia. So he doesn’t even have any Turkic DNA. My heritage is very inaccurate.
Because central asians original native americans
Nice results.You are about at least %60 turkmen with Anatolian ancestry
Mostly turk.Amerindian Central asian and West asian is confused part of your Turkic side
.Also you have turkic haplogroup R1a-Z93 is the common haplogroup among Krgyzs
Here are 2 Mycenean kits from Peloponesse 1200 BC:
1. Z667807
2. Z004092
The first get 1.21% Siberian and the second get 3.51% Baltic.
I had also 1.78% Siberian and you told me its from my "Turkic ancestors" and i had also 14.65% Baltic and you told me its from my "Slavic" ancestors.
What are you saying now?
Both samples have also "Red Sea" that like you said is typical for Pontic Greeks... ;)
@@user-zm8nb8pk4n Yes Red sea is common among pontians.It might be ancient trait.
Siberian is %100 turkic admixture and East Asian tho.
Those samples can have slavic admixture and slavs have always connection with turkic tribes.Todays Russians are %10 mongoloid because of that.
BUT....I still think it comes from your pontian ancestor.If your ancestor is from Trabzon or Giresun Region it is very normal to having both Red Sea and Siberian dna.During the ottoman Empire Turkmens came to Giresun Region.Watch the videos from Giresun.Sure you don't have siberian as they have(They are %8) Since you are greek.
Test your pontian side i am pretty sure siberian comes from that.Mainland greeks dont score mongoloid
@@chandman381 You sure takes narcotic, siberian the myheritage the having ethnic, nowhere word turk, turk not is ethnic but state with many ethnic,
(Pontians have moggoloid) Hahahahahahaha, Hahahahahahaha. We are native Anatolia original and also halpogroups Hahahahahaha
The haplogroup is from ancient Iranian tribes! Read Iranian Peoples: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_peoples
27% Greek, 8% Turk. Typical
He is %70 Turkish (West asian+Central asian)
@@thekraken1173 West asia isnt turkic
@@Swizherless It is not guaranteed to be turkic but it may be. Not all turkic tribes came from central asia. Also when they Show somewhere on My Heritage DNA results, they show your modern equivelent.
@@thekraken1173 No they don't. If they did, Americans would get American and the Sicilians would get Italian instead of Greek. These tests read your haplogroups. Also no, there were no Turkic tribes in Anatolia in the bronze age, the Persian times, the Roman or the Greek ages.
He is 10% Turkic because of native and meso American
Its Proto turkic
so 7.8% turkic
No he is %70 Turkish (West asian+Central asian)
@@thekraken1173 😂 west asain isn’t turkic, it’s the product of forced turkification, 7.8 turkic.. the only link is a language 🧬🤣
show us your dna relatives, lets see those Armenians and Greek before forced turkification
@@Kristov818 West asia may be referring to anatolia greeks, armenians but it could also be Turks. Reminding you that al the Turks didn’t live in central asia. There were western asian Turks even before Turks came into anatolia.
@@thekraken1173 they were not “turks” or “turkic” the first mention of a “turk” was in the 6th century in what is China today, all because they were forcibly turkified doesn’t make them turkic
I think the MDLP K16 very good. It appears to be more general than Eurogones that targets European populations. Was what you expected?
West Asia hepimizde yüksek oranda çıkıyor.. Gercek Anadoluluyuz...
@Nadir Kuleli koskoca Osmanlı'ya yokmu sayiosunuz... Atalarımız 1500yildir bu topraklarda cirit atio.. Karışmış olabiliriz ama sadece evlilikle.. İnan baba.. Bizim erkeklerimiz farklı milletlerle evlenmeyi sevio.. Atalarımızindan kalan bu yabancı kadın hevesi geni bugünlere kadar devam edio.. Türk milleti rum erkeklerinden değil karilardan almış tüm dna sini... Günümüzdede ruslara kafayı taktı bizim herifler.. Ucguruna pek düşkün 😂😂😂😜😜😜
@Nadir Kuleli ve musluman toplum İslami kabul etmeyen kimseye kız vermezdi... Kız alirlardı ama😜😜😜
@@haticeyuce9685 1500 yıldır ?
Daha Hz. Muhammed doğmamış ne diyorsun bacım
Aynen.. Al bak günümüzdede hiç degismedi.. Hala aynı kültür devam edip..
@@birkisi8294 o gelmeden öncede vardı türkler anadoluda
U are 70% Turkic! congrats!
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
How can you be w. Asian, c. Asian and american and have greek dna? How does that work?
Welcome to Turkey! Where every Empire and Culture had SEX with each other! Turkey was the bridge of civilizations. + Native Americans migrated from "what is now considered to be the birthplace of Turks" to what is now America, trough the Atlantic pass by foot (in the ice age) where it was still connected. That's why there are so many similarieties between them. But you can't consider them to be "Turks" they are of course a whole new Ethnicity.
You are not really Turk. You are only 10% Turk, look to see what happened and you speak Turkish. Do you speak the language of your conqueror? The one who slaughtered your ancestors?
@Kerem I don't understand you. He has only 10% tourkish dna.
@@gn3528
“Previous genetic studies have generally used Turks as representatives of ancient Anatolians. Our results show that Turks are genetically shifted towards Central Asians, a pattern consistent with a history of mixture with populations from this region. These diversity patterns observed in the PCA motivated formal testing of admixture in Armenians and other regional populations.”
www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/18/015396.full.pdf
“In addition, although some degree of genetic continuity could be expected in Anatolia (i.e. in modern Turks), it should be noted that modern Turks are a hybrid population, comprising of the original Anatolian stock, Turkic people (i.e. of Central Asian ancestry). This is surely reflected in the modern Turkish Y-DNA”
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179474
The weight for the migration event predicted to originate from the branch ancestral to East Asia into current-day Turkey was 0.217 (21.7%). Although this implies a major population event from the East to West Asia, we note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates. First, the original contributing populations to the ancestral population in Turkey are not known. For instance, we do not know the exact genetic relationship between current-day East Asian populations and the Turkic speakers from Central Asia who migrated into Anatolia about 1,000 years before present.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236450/
(Note:%21.7 doesn’t mean %21.7 Turk because first Turks were %40-45 east eurasian not %100 so it means %50 Turk by blood)
abload.de/img/untitled-1b3k6r.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/747058885797347388/747081098621616188/74270248_151753982884837_667409747107905536_n.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/746376025944096778/784377847082647582/unknown.png
DNA from a 2,000-year-old burial site in Mongolia has revealed new information about the Xiongnu, a nomadic tribe that once reigned in Central Asia. Researchers in France studied DNA from more than 62 skeletons to reconstruct the history and social organization of a long-forgotten culture. Skeletons from the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day Turkey. This supports other studies indicating that Turkish tribes originated at least in part in Mongolia at the end of the Xiongnu period.
www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_03/ancient.shtml
The people of modern-day Iran and Turkey trace their genetic heritage to the ancient Persians and the Turkic ethnic people, respectively.
www.myheritage.com.tr/ethnicities/broadly-west-asian/ethnicity-worldwide-distribution
Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/G25_PCA_East_Mediterranean.png_-_Anatolia_and_the_surrounding.png
Some malevolent people or people who do not know enough about the subject try to exaggerate the rate of Turks and Armenians in Anatolia. For example, it is possible to encounter people who claim that approximately 50% of Anatolian Turks are of Greek or Armenian origin. However, when the Ottoman Tahrir registers belonging to the years 1520-1530 are examined, it is concretely revealed that even 93% of the Anatolian people belonged to Turkmen tribes and communities. The non-Muslim population ratio of approximately 10% has remained at the same rates in the last periods of the Ottoman Empire. In some parts of Anatolia, with the effect of Islamization, a small number of indigenous people, who were Muslims, were dissolved in the Turks. Moreover relocation and exchange with the separated Greeks and Armenians from Turkey Turkey genetic structure is completely different from the Turks. Although there was a partial change in the demographic structure of eastern Anatolia with the settlement of Kurds in Eastern Anatolia in the 16th century, it was easier for Muslim Turks and Kurds to merge in that region. Since the 19th century, a significant portion of non-Muslim immigration that took place in Turkey Turks (Caucasus and Balkan Turks) reccommended. These also partially affected the existing population and genetic structure.
As a result, his "ethnic Turks", "Turkmen" or "nomads" as a defining Turkey Turkey genetically Central Asians (Turkmenistan) seems to be quite close to the Turkmens. Turkey is quite obvious they resemble each other in the middle compared the genetic structure of Turkish and Turkmen. Turks and Turkmens belong to the Oghuzs in the historical process and show similarities with each other, both in terms of language, culture or ethnicity. you maintain genetic and historical research, Turkey shows that the Turkmen origin, in other words, the Turkish Anatolian Turks.
www.haplogruplar.com/turkiye-turklerinin-orta-asyali-turkmenlerle-genetik-akrabaligi/
@@papazataklaattiranimam Sorry my friend but I could not read everything you write, it is incoherent, without logic.
The genuine Turks are a non-European people, not white, whose cradle is Central Asia. When they first appeared in Europe, they looked so much like the Mongols that it was difficult to separate them. Is that what today's Turks look like?
The Turkish language is not European (it does not belong to the Indo-European homologue), it is also of Central Asian origin.
Those who today have Turkish citizenship but are not Central Asians, but whites, descendants of the peoples who lived in the former Byzantine Empire, speak the language of their conqueror. Very simple.
Let's not tell stories, the DNA and the phenotype of the population say it all.
I do not know how humiliating it is for today's Turks to speak the language of the conqueror (and his religion, etc.).
If there are original Turks in today's Turkey, I see no reason for them to try to adopt a European origin, which even children understand is fake.
Do not be ashamed of your origin, thus insulting your relatives peoples in Central Asia.
@@gn3528
Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
@@gn3528
Turkish and Turkmen look like similar we are not different
Hi brother,27%hellenic.😂
not only %27. %63 west asian probably indicates anatolian greeks.
@@gelbsan No west asia is Turkish,Kurdish?Armenian,Georgian,Azerbaijan,Iranian
@@anzi719 yes, west asia includes all these countries, medieval anatolian population was probably member of this group.
@@anzi719 You need to realise that Turkish is a made up ethnicity
@Aziz Yigido ?????
Anadoluda türk yok
Nasıl bir yokluktasın
Ok
Bunu diyen yunana ve ermeni karışımı arkadaş 😂😂😂 ve arap ve farslı ve Kürt dünyada en çok karışmış milletsiniz melezliğide geçtiniz kendi dna uzmanlarınız söylüyor türk e en yakın millet ermeniler eemeniler sizin kardeşinşz azeriler değil 😊
@@xurtekurdistane3277 sg
@@xurtekurdistane3277 (note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
8.9 Turk.27.3,Greek.
Not 8.9 West asia turk but central asia turk
HİSTORY 1071 MALAZGİRT WAR
@@Conqueror997 west asia türk demek değil. Kafkaslarda iranlılarda yunanlarda araplarda çokça bulunur.
@@gelbsan bunlar batı asya'yı yani anadoluyu türk değil diyorlar senin deden 29 ağustost 1071'de gelmiş sonra derler ki anadolu türk değil derler Anadolu türktür
@@Conqueror997 bir tane mi deden var? dedelerinin çoğu anadolu rumu yunan veya ermeni
Turkified Anatolian Greek!
oxi
Anatolian is Türk 1071 Malazgirt War
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
sj
he is %70 turk
Sorry for that but the idea of so-called "Greek Anatolians" is totally wrong. Firstly Ancient Greeks had colonized only some harbor villages on the seashore and Greek colonizers of ancient times had totally been males; so even in the ancient times,the seashore colonies of Greeks were of mixed genetical structures (for example in the Greek colonies on the southwest Anatolian shore, population was genetically half Carian and half Greek even excluding the pure Carians which were metoikos and living in those villages).
Secondly after the Persian invasion and a new genetical mixing, Alexander the Great of Macedonians (he was not Greek, he was a Macedonian educated by a great Greek phylosopher Aristo) had invaded the landmass from today's Albania to Afghanistan, Balkans to Egypt. The small Greek population was scattered in a very large population of Balkans,Anatolia, Egypt, Persia, Syria, Iraq, Levant, Afghanistan and some parts of Pakistan of today. Scattered Greeks were totally assimilated by the local communities (genetically) but left their cultural identity and Greek language as a common way of communication between different ethnicities (just like Mongol invaders of China and Iran in assimilation, and English in today's world). The only genetically pure (if there were left) Greeks were left in Peloponnes and Attics after Hellenic Age but Greek language became an international communication language in the Southwest Asia and Egypt. (Even the King Herod of Bible was Jewish but speaking Greek and practicing Greek culture, remember).
Thirdly, just after Roman expansion and invasion in today's Greece, Roman administration exiled the last pure Greeks all around the Roman Empire just like it did to Jewish people as to prevent a possible rebellion against Roman administration (the Roman administrators were seeing the nations who had nationalistic mind as a threat against imperial administration). By this, the ancient Greek genetic line totally dissolved at the start of the first centuries A.D. Greek language survived as it was benling used as an international communication language in the eastern part of Roman Empire just like Latin in Western part. Also Bible had been translated firstly into Greek just because most people knew that language. First eastern churches started to use Greek language for rituals. Therefore, after 7th century, East Roman administration started to use Greek as an official language to make the administrative orders reach to local ethnicities in a multiethnical empire. Opposite to the most people's knowledge, nearly the only Greek thing in East Roman Empire was official and religious language. Even the emperors were from different ethnicities, Bulgarian,African, Arab, Thracian, Macedonian (even two of them were Khazar Turkic).
Lastly,modern Greek nation was established by English and French romantics of 19th century. They created a New nation based on the history and myths of Ancient Greece and East Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) from the Orthodox Christian Albanians, Ulahs, Macedonians, Romans, Bulgarians, even Arabs and Turks. At the start of the Peloponnes Rebellion in 1820s, the Rebellion was not Greek, it was a Orthodox Rebellion. By the help of the English, French and Russians, a new country was established and its curricula was based on romantics of Western World (one of them was Lord Byron of English). Every different ethnicity was assimilated into the newly established Greek identity. So modern "Greek nation" had a mixed genetical pool of all the region at the start. Even in the population exchange between Turkey and Greece in second half of 1920s, one million Anatolian Orthodox Christians were sent to Greece where had a population of only 3 millions at that time. The 650 thousands of these exiled Christian people were Christian Orthodox Karamanlides, who had been in Anatolia and using Turkish language as mother language long before the coming of Muslim Turks in 1071. They were taken from Balkan Turkic populations of Pechenekhs, Uzs and Avars and converted to Christianity by East Roman Empire to use against Sasanide Empire. They were writing Turkish with Greek alphabeth, they were speaking Turkish both in daily and house lifes and even in Church rituals, they were baptised with pure Turkish names. When they were sent to Greece in 1920s, nearly none of them were knowing Greek language.
Just think about how "Greek"is today's Greeks and how Greek is that gene pool (even the company says only 30% of the genes in that cathegory is coming from the region shown in animation). Just think.
Good thread! I just wanted to add some things.
Even if the Macedonians were not Greeks, were surely the most closely related people to the Greeks. That is obvious by their names, the names of their cities and the few written words we have find. So on DNA basis I would categorize them as nearly identical.
Secondly, the idea of a Greek nation is not a western idea. Since at least 1230 and the Empire of Nicea, we have testimonies of the Roman Emperor calling himself as “originating from the nation of the Hellens”. In general after 1204 the Romans had started seeing themselves more like Greeks and less like Romans.
Is a misconception to believe that during the Revolution of 1821, there were not Greeks at all, and only Albanians, Vlachs etc. This is wrong. In Peloponnesus, and on the islands the Greeks were majority. The Albanians were a big percentage but still minority. This minority was completely “hellenised” before even the revolution began. It’s documented that the Albanians were sending their children on Greek schools and that the Albanian language was only vocal.
In general the Revolution of 1821 was ethnic and religious. They took part mainly Greek speaking orthodox and in second degree Albanian speaking orthodox.
Greece even without the “western ideas” would again follow an “ Ancient Greece” policy for its people. That’s because the masterminds behind the revolution like Kapodistrias, Mavrokordatos, Ipsilantis, were well educated and in Europe and had already adopted the romantic ideas of the West
@@giannis7720 Your first idea is not so opposite to the things i had said. But the main point here is that even the ancient Macedonians and Greeks had genetical similarities (probably much less than you expected because for example Cretans/Minoans had an ancestry of North African hami-semitic lineage), all the Macedonian-Greek genetical lineage was nearly assimilated in an ocean of other ethnicities of Hellenistic world. So ancient Greeks and today's Greeks are only as relative as other ethnicities of today's world and ancient Greeks.
Secondly the idea of Hellenism and Greek nationalism is not the same thing. Hellenism was defended and tried to be propogated even in ancient Greece but the concept of nationalism is a thing created after French revolution in 1789. Otherwise we should accept the sayings of Bilge Khagan and Thonyukhuk of Gokturk Khaganate in Orkhun Monoliths in 7th century as a depiction of "Turkish nationalism" but they are not (even they used the name Turk for nation and country). The 13th century Hellenism was based on the idea of Orthodoxism against Catholic crusade against Constantinopolis (as the Nikaia Empire was established because of the invasion of Constantinopolis by the Catholic crusaders).
And lastly Greek schools were firstly established by the funds of Western romantics and later used by Orthodox churches to fullfill the objective of creating a Greek (not Hellen) nation. The core of that idea had been started just after the French revolution (30 years before the Peloponnes Rebellion) by theOrthodox Christians who were doing bussiness with French or educated in West European countries or in Russia. Greek language and Greek names were preferred to be used in ordinary life after that period (before that, Greek language was only limited in churches at least in the period between 1453 and 1789). Therefore you can see the the change in names from ordinary Christian names to ancient Greek names (like Socrates, Themistocles, Pericles etc.) in historical Church records. Also there were not only the Albanians but many other ethnicities assimilated in this soup. The main point is that this soup is not Greek, i have an objection on the naming of it. South Balkan and near eastern is a better naming for that. Have a nice day my friend.
@@boraboranloglu9489 hellenism and greek nationalism is the same how does a turk that scores greek tries to tell us that greece doesnt exist lol your own dna contradicts you regarldess of that greeks where hellenic tribes living in italy and due to the italian influence of europe we was named greeks from the grecians.... theres greeks pashas greek notable heroes in the ottoman empire lol we was never destroyed during the ottoman empire they where still greek school and where called hidden schools like i said when trying to educate someone ensure that you know what youre talking about turks where originally central asian and not west asian as they migrated as they where nomads west asiasn where the anatolian population therefore you mixed with that population you also cant accept that your peoples have major greek and balkanic influnences and go on to say that greeks aint even greeks where theres been european genetical researches which contradict your theory.... anyways have a good day and embrace the greek in you !!
@@AP-lb5wt You modern Greeks don't like to read long texts, i think. And this is a proof alone you are not coming from ancient Greeks :)
Your answers are written above but for an answer to your "hidden" question i want to share something:
There is no DNA correspond to a nation in genetics. You can say Baltic, North Atlantic, Siberian, Far Eastern, West, Asian, South Asian, South Saharan in genetics to name gene pools. This concepts are used in real genetics, i can share with you many scientific articles but apparently you cant understand what they tell in those articles because of your nationalistic bias and built-up historical view in your mind.
The oldest nation that used "Turk" name as its ethnicity was Gokturks (there were several Turkic ethnicities before them, but they were the first using Turk for themselves). Their capital was in today's Mongolia and they have burials (cemeteries) there. They had lived between 4th-5th to 8th centuries. So, according to your mind, they should have much more Far Eastern DNA compared to today's Turks. But the genetic materials derived/taken from their bones show us that their average genetic composition is like this: 48,7% Baltic and North Atlantic, 18% West Asian, 2.2% Sub-Saharan, 22% Siberian and 10% Far Eastern. For comparison, even Finnish people have 12% Siberian DNA in average, Other Scandinavians have 4% Siberian also. For comparison, Mongolians have mostly Far Eastern DNA with Siberian. Apparently even Gokturks were mixed at the start and they were mostly European with some Far Eastern DNA. So, the European compound in today's Turks is coming mostly from the original ancestry of Turks and belonged to the historical period "before" they had interacted with Balkan populations and Anatolian indigenious people.
You don't even know about devshirme system as understood from your text. The taken and converted people couldnot marry except they had a rank of pasha according to Ottoman legislation. So the mixage is so limited if you mention about a process based on devshirmes.
But ınterestingly the same devshirme system had been implemented by East Romans for hundreds of years (they took people from pagans, generally from northern Balkans, including mostly Turkic ethnicities like Pechenegs, Uzs, Kumans, Avars, first Balkan Bulgars - when they were pagan Turkic and not Christian - ) and also in Hellenic Era, it was largely used by Empires and states. So even the people whose ancestors you think originally Greek were firstly Greekified/Hellenized, and after that they were " Turkified" . I told many things in my comment above, but apparently you didn't read them.
Dodecad k12b paylaşabilir misiniz ?
amazing
63% Anatolian, 27% Greek , 7% Turkic, the rest are confused Siberian. Nice.
he is %70 turk
West Asian is Iran Aramaic, Armenian Kurdish youre not Turk😂
@Atrak Original Turkish DNA is Central Asia not West Asia thats 100% Not Turkish dna West Asian is more than Iran its Kurdish Aramaic and more other Ethnic Groups. You are 100% not a Turk accept it.
West Asia can be GREEK, ARMENIA, ASSYRIUS, IRAN, GEORGIA
@VIENNA KavkazTurkish Turks looks like greeks or kurds real Turks looks like Chinese
@Kerem Accept it thats Truth Turks are Mixed people
@@SamuelMattitjahu2013 You are correct!
You are originally from Ancient Iranian
Aziz Yigido hindu are not aryan, they are originally aboriginal. Also the aryans that came to India are persians basically
Actually not because this isn't show nations only regions
@@captanphillips7794 learn about Iranian peoples
@@lovelyartin (note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
he is %70 turk
so you are armenian/kurdish + greek....good news for you!
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
he is %70 turk
Do Any one believe on this ? If yes then they can find my far family who I'm trying to find them.
The majority of the heritage percentage comes from the old turkic people so u are mostly Turk
90% Indo-European
10% Turkic
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
bruh
he is %70 turk
I wonder how you got native american
Native American and Siberian Turkic are same blood,the real proof Q haplogroup
@@azizyigido İngilizlerde o mantığa göre Türk oluyor.
he is %70 turk cool
You are i think hun and yours dads and moms Live since Ottoman Empire and i think yours family iş ship captain
Mediterranean Sea 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Kizildereli?! ilginc
What's your haplogroup
R1a-Z93
@@berkalper9996 That's the clade of the haplogroup associated with east Europeans and indoaryan found in asia, thus indoaryans which encompass all the indoeuropean speaking people of Asia from northern Indians , Pakistanis afghans and Tajiks all the way to Anatolia and Kurds and Iranians. Of course Turkish group acquired that same branch by intermixing with the original Scythian populations of central Asia. A deeper clade analyses will tell you more about your male linage(although Y-dna only tells you about 2% of your DNA). Depending on which clade of Z93 you have will tell you whether it came with Turkish migration or far earlier Iranian migrations.
@@parapoliticos52 How can I find out my haplogroup? I did myheritage too.
For Autosomal test: Morley Tree DNA or Ysec Clade Finder
@Kerem They got it from the central asian indoaryans. The same ones that went to form the persian nation and the indoeuropean speaking nations of
India. R1a-z93.
But each region has different branches of z93. Z93 found in Turkey is maynly of the Iranian-middle eastern branch.
Kapadokya derken nerelisin Reis?
Aksaray
Berk Alper merhaba gardaş annemin sonuçları kanalımda yorum at beğen ❤️
@@berkalper9996 dostum o Native American nasıl çıktı ya ben de Karadenizliyim Sibirya çıktı ikimiz de kızıl deriliyiz :D
You are Iranian
you are literally moron
Hahahaha wtf no
The west Asian genes of the Turks mostly come from the Caucasus. Most companies separate Iran, Turkey and the Caucasus, but this company is very superficial.
Congratulations you deserve a reward.
he is %70 turk
You can see in yourube:
1) What Happened to the Greeks of Asia Minor?)
2) ANCIENT GREEK CITIES IN ASIA MINOR
3) How was Anatolia colonized by Turks?
4) The Untold Genocide : The Greek Genocide
5) Potinan Greek Genocide by Ottoman Empire
6)Greek invasion of Turkey and the aftermath of the events, 1919 - 1922
7) Pontus : History of Pontus ( history)
8) 90 Yillik Ayrilik Mubadele / 90 Years of Separation : Turkish - Greek Population Exchange (Eng - Sub)
9) Recep Tayyip Erdogan : The Greek President of Turkey
10) The History of the Greeks
11) The History of Anatolia : Every Year
I literally see u commenting this everywhere. What's up with that ? Why do you care for people to watch all those videos ?
@@hayal6539 What country are you from and do you live in?
@@archonpanagiotis6158 I'm originally from Turkey but live in Germany. What does my ethnic background have to do with my original question tho?
@@hayal6539 I asked your origin, because depending on your knowledge of the area, it should be my answer. An American or an Englishwoman does not know the history or the peculiarities of the region. I send to people who have Greek dna and some facts they may not know! Anatolia is a mosaic of Peoples, Religions and many events, become known in recent years by citizens! We are victims of people (in both countries) who made our countries clash and oppress those who did not like their plans. Fortunately, Erdogan is working against the people of the system and at some point we will find them (besides the People) and the rulers. I hope i did not tire you! Good night to you!
@@hayal6539 What city are you from? If you want you can answer ...!
Welcome To greek family 🇬🇷
Gözü de görmüyor bunların
Gedmatch 0% Greek 🙄
Not Greek,ıts a fake group in greaks..your language is hint-europe
@@Zeus_aktiegud It has to be really hard to breed fifthy million babies soon. You know, it's five hundred percent of world Greek population, although the Greek population is decreasing. But in my view, that islands are very narrow for sixty million Greeks. Y'all sure?
@@avukatrecep8016 here is genetic the myheritage dna is genetic no language
Stolen Greek kid...
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
İgnorant little greek
Lmao
he is %70 turk
You are 63% kurd, 27.2% Greek/Italian, and 7.8 % Turk.
is west asian means kurd? Are you kidding?
Stfu
“Previous genetic studies have generally used Turks as representatives of ancient Anatolians. Our results show that Turks are genetically shifted towards Central Asians, a pattern consistent with a history of mixture with populations from this region. These diversity patterns observed in the PCA motivated formal testing of admixture in Armenians and other regional populations.”
www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/18/015396.full.pdf
“In addition, although some degree of genetic continuity could be expected in Anatolia (i.e. in modern Turks), it should be noted that modern Turks are a hybrid population, comprising of the original Anatolian stock, Turkic people (i.e. of Central Asian ancestry). This is surely reflected in the modern Turkish Y-DNA”
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179474
The weight for the migration event predicted to originate from the branch ancestral to East Asia into current-day Turkey was 0.217 (21.7%). Although this implies a major population event from the East to West Asia, we note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates. First, the original contributing populations to the ancestral population in Turkey are not known. For instance, we do not know the exact genetic relationship between current-day East Asian populations and the Turkic speakers from Central Asia who migrated into Anatolia about 1,000 years before present.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236450/
(Note:%21.7 doesn’t mean %21.7 Turk because first Turks were %40-45 east eurasian not %100 so it means %50 Turk by blood)
abload.de/img/untitled-1b3k6r.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/747058885797347388/747081098621616188/74270248_151753982884837_667409747107905536_n.png
media.discordapp.net/attachments/746376025944096778/784377847082647582/unknown.png
DNA from a 2,000-year-old burial site in Mongolia has revealed new information about the Xiongnu, a nomadic tribe that once reigned in Central Asia. Researchers in France studied DNA from more than 62 skeletons to reconstruct the history and social organization of a long-forgotten culture. Skeletons from the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day Turkey. This supports other studies indicating that Turkish tribes originated at least in part in Mongolia at the end of the Xiongnu period.
www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_03/ancient.shtml
The people of modern-day Iran and Turkey trace their genetic heritage to the ancient Persians and the Turkic ethnic people, respectively.
www.myheritage.com.tr/ethnicities/broadly-west-asian/ethnicity-worldwide-distribution
Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/G25_PCA_East_Mediterranean.png_-_Anatolia_and_the_surrounding.png
Some malevolent people or people who do not know enough about the subject try to exaggerate the rate of Turks and Armenians in Anatolia. For example, it is possible to encounter people who claim that approximately 50% of Anatolian Turks are of Greek or Armenian origin. However, when the Ottoman Tahrir registers belonging to the years 1520-1530 are examined, it is concretely revealed that even 93% of the Anatolian people belonged to Turkmen tribes and communities. The non-Muslim population ratio of approximately 10% has remained at the same rates in the last periods of the Ottoman Empire. In some parts of Anatolia, with the effect of Islamization, a small number of indigenous people, who were Muslims, were dissolved in the Turks. Moreover relocation and exchange with the separated Greeks and Armenians from Turkey Turkey genetic structure is completely different from the Turks. Although there was a partial change in the demographic structure of eastern Anatolia with the settlement of Kurds in Eastern Anatolia in the 16th century, it was easier for Muslim Turks and Kurds to merge in that region. Since the 19th century, a significant portion of non-Muslim immigration that took place in Turkey Turks (Caucasus and Balkan Turks) reccommended. These also partially affected the existing population and genetic structure.
As a result, his "ethnic Turks", "Turkmen" or "nomads" as a defining Turkey Turkey genetically Central Asians (Turkmenistan) seems to be quite close to the Turkmens. Turkey is quite obvious they resemble each other in the middle compared the genetic structure of Turkish and Turkmen. Turks and Turkmens belong to the Oghuzs in the historical process and show similarities with each other, both in terms of language, culture or ethnicity. you maintain genetic and historical research, Turkey shows that the Turkmen origin, in other words, the Turkish Anatolian Turks.
www.haplogruplar.com/turkiye-turklerinin-orta-asyali-turkmenlerle-genetik-akrabaligi/
you are literally moron
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
West Asian= arménien 63%, 27% greque et italiens du sud et 7% peuple turcophone
ahahahah wtf there is no armenian he is %70 turk %30 greek italian
@@user-rn5pi6fb9g Les vrai turques viens d'Asie, de Mongolie, ils sont pas d'Anatolie... Apprenez l'histoire et le génétique...
Did the Turks of Central Asia Do the ancestors of the Turks of Türkiye have slanted eyes? And why do almost no modern Turks have slanted eyes? Can you answer me? @@ANAHITE1
Iranian and roman .nice result bro👍
bruuuuh :d AHAHAHAHAH
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
he is %70 turk
Tanrım, ortadaki Amerikan ırkı nedir?
Cerkeslik varmi ve kimde ?
ne çerkesi aq
@@m3t4l-thr36 normal soru sordum ne bu atar
@@cosmictweenz1346 çerkesler turk degil west asian dnasi turkler ve irani kavimleri gosteriyor orta asya zaten bizim
@@m3t4l-thr36 gedmatchten bahsetmistim West asia tek Iran degil en cok gürcülerde bide abhazlarda cikiyor yani kafkas halklarinda daha cok cikiyor
@@cosmictweenz1346 kafkas halklari turk, orda nogaylar gibi bir çok turk boyluklari var
فقط 7 درصد ژنتیکت ترکه 😂😂😂
he is %70 turk
São Jorge
tu ji ku ye?
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
mohammed khalil
Turk 7,8 😂😂😂
go learn genetic..
West asia is turkish
@@konsey9494 West Asia ist Greek Armenien Kurdistan Syrien Iran Georgien yok Tourkalades
@@athanasiosv3758 dont talk bullshit. West asia is Turk,Persian,georgian
@@konsey9494 Tourkalades is Central Asia yok W Asia Armenien Kurdistan Syrien ist W Asia
Only 7% turk
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
he is %70 turk
you are kurdish
Lol!
@VIENNA TurkishWolf just like Pan-Turkists, Pan-Iranists also claim that Georgians and Armenians are Iranic (lol they complain about Pan-Turkists because they claim everyone as Turkic but Pan-Iranists do the same)
:)
Baseless claims are just stupid no matter if they are Pan-Iranist or Pan-Turkist or sth else :v
You are turk-iranian mixed arab
(note=west asia is turkic. look at history. even today too much Turkic clans are live in caucausus.
Meskhetian Turks.)
Azerbaijanis.
Balkarians.
Karachays.
Sands.
Nogays.
Georgian Kipchaks
Terekemes
he is %70 turk
Kızıl dereliler türktür derler 🤣🤣🤣🤣
hirvatlar kürt diyene de gördük🤣
Önemi yok Türkfobiliğinizi her şekilde belli ediyorsunuz.
LOL NATIVE AMERICAN?
%100 Anatolimutt
If Anatolians are inferior people in your opinion
Why don't you hate Anatolian Greeks? They are Anatolian too
I bet you don't hate them or see them as inferior
That is why I like the internet
I see many people who conflict with themselves, quite funny
:v
@@abk4467
I never said Anatolians are inferior,There is no Masterrace,Modern Anatolians are very mixed
@@anatolimuttlearnshisorigin3145 okay, that's not something I'll deny
@@abk4467 Denying your origins is a bad thing,I created this account to trigger Nationalistic Racist Turks
@@anatolimuttlearnshisorigin3145 okay then :v