Well, the best prosecutors for Baldwin wouldn’t have pursued charges to begin with. The guy is a A list prick, but I never saw merit in the case against him
She comes across as unhinged. Hopefully she never practices law inside a courtroom again. Although maybe she could finish her legacy as being the only prosecutor capable of losing the Sarah Boone case.
@@zsoltszabo6482She was just a special prosecutor brought in for this case, she’s regularly a defense attorney which she may be better suited for. I can see her being a zealous advocate for a client well.
I think it’s more than that. This was her moment to SHINE!! And take down a mega star on live tv. She was so obsessed with winning that she violated ethics. I think she’s primarily trying to save face, because narcissists care WAY too much about what randos think of them. But yeah, she wants to avoid any and all consequences too.
Be careful talking about Sarah Boone. Peter loves her and takes her side on pretty much everything. He seems soft on her and wants the best for her. He may not take kindly to anything said unflattering towards his Sarah.
Is she out of her ever-lovin' mind? Casting doubt on witnesses, prosecutors, and the investigation IS A DEFENSE LAWYER'S JOB! As a shooter, my OPINION is that Baldwin was careless and stupid. That doesn't excuse Morrisey's misbehavior. The judge made the right call. I hope more judges dismiss with prejudice for Brady violations. The DA needs to receive sanctions (aka fines) too.
This doesn’t come off as a Legal Debate or Argument but rather a Sour Grapes Rant by someone who botched the job. Some times it is better to just say nothing no matter what she thinks.
I'm glad prosecutor Johnson resigned from this case. The ship she was assigned to caught fire, took on water, and is headed straight into a legal storm of hurricane proportions.
35:32 These are the reasons I think Tuskee’s ammo matters to Hannah’s case: 1) Yes, it sounds like Bowles knew that Tuskee had ammunition that came from Thell Reed’s batch and was divided between Tuskee and Seth Kinney; HOWEVER, he did NOT realize that ammunition included rounds that MATCHED what killed Halyna. While initially the police and prosecution didn’t know this either, they DID know after examining what Tuskee brought in on March 6. CST Pope testified that Morrisey and Hancock were at the courthouse IN HG’s trial. I’m really curious what time this all happened, but assuming it was during business hours, this ammo came in either during closing arguments or while the jury was deliberating. CST Pope looked at and logged all the ammunition in and per her testimony she DID recognize that there were brass Starline bullets with silver primers. So technically this evidence was turned in DURING not after HGs case, and while Pope called and spoke to Hancock and Morrisey about this ammunition drop-off, no one notified Bowles (not even sure how that process works on the last day of trial or during jury deliberations…can lawyers make emergency motions regarding new evidence and you suspend jury deliberations?). 2) HG may have been convicted because of her cumulative negligence as seen by the jurors. The state’s case was that HG was the only one who had access to these brass starlight rounds with silver primers. So she brought the ammo on set which we will never know but for some jurors may have been the biggest offense in her negligence, and she additionally didn’t safeguard or check for live vs dummy rounds in the gun that day. Tuskee having matching ammo provides reasonable doubt that HG was the only possible source for the live rounds on set. Seth Kinney agrees that he was with Thell Reed and Tuskee for the 1883 gun training and he also corroborated to police that yes, he and Tuskee split up Thell’s ammo and both took some, and he even said that he took this ammo back to the PDQ warehouse. This is pretty huge, because that means if Tuskee had rounds that matched the fatal bullet, and both he and Seth agree that their rounds came from the same batch, then the jury could have found that Seth Kinney ALSO had those brass rounds with silver primers and thus HE could have been the source for the live ammo on set, not HG. This could have totally changed how jurors evaluated HGs culpability in what happened that day.
Morrissey, the CSI woman and the lead detective went through so much trouble to hide that ammo for a reason. The judge knew exactly why. Which is why she looked so closely at it herself. It's also really weird for a prosecutor to do that. Usually when prosecutors hide exculpatory evidence they tuck it safely away in their case files. So they can ease their consciences by saying "well at least the defendant's appellate lawyers can use it for appeal." I think that's what got the judge really pissed off. There's a culture in the courts that it's one thing to not turn over exculpatory evidence. But it's a whole nother to hide evidence permanently like that. There's this weird thing where they don't believe prosecutors should have to lose every single time some defendant happens to be innocent. You know that would hurt a prosecutor's career. Hurt the DA's election chances. So they see not turning over exculpatory evidence as very different than actually hiding the evidence like this.
Yes the investigator knew bcos there if you read the Judge written ruling, she disclosed there was a supplemental report done that explicitly said the troy teske(?) rounds matched the HG rounds on set. So they knew.. this report was never brought up on trial or disclosed to media until this ruling. So the judge knew right away that they lied on the stand when the CST said that the rounda “obviously” didnt match. And this was an answer elicited by Morrisey via leading question so it was very very suspicious. Morrisey probably knew that they were lying and the rounds DID match because: (1) she was there when they had a meeting deciding to file it in a diff case file; (2) it’s highly unlikely she never read that report; (3) she lead CST to answer on stand that the rounds “obviously didnt match”; and (4) out of all the reports and evidence filed on rust, this is the ONLY ONE report/evidence they “deemed” irrelevant to the case and filed on a separate doc file That seems more and more like malicious / intentional misconduct to me.
Wow. This lady is a piece of work. This just scares me for those who’ve been prosecuted by here before her unlawful practices came to us the public. I think we have some narcissistic personality going on.
Propably wanted a career boost from putting a famous person behind bars. And to be fair, a better prosecutor _could_ have made a case, though propably not as bad as this one tried to. But in the end i agree with the judge, the prosecution handled things so messily that i doubt there would have been a fair trial even with another team.
Could just be personal bias against Baldwin. I mean just look at how worked up a lot of conservatives are getting over this. Prosecutors aren't immune from the same biases we're all subject to.
@@tewks4458I don’t think that this is political. I am not a fan of Alec Baldwin but the prosecutors actions were outrageous and the judge did the right thing, imo.
I’m confused. These documents sound like the case is still ongoing. Hasn’t it been completely dismissed with prejudice. Are there separate charges where double jeopardy doesn’t apply?
Sanctions please, for this toxic prosecutor. The thing is, what she did was unethical and really not very smart. I have chatted with a couple of attorneys since the trial and they said trying to hide evidence under a different case number is 'amateur hour' and no ethical DA would ever do that. I'm no expert, just saying attorneys seem to side with Baldwin's legal team on what happened and most definitely agree with the judge's determination.
I can't believe whoever proof-read this paper for her didn't say, "Uhhhhhh are you sure you want to release this? It's not really a good look for our side."
@@OldLadyBakesactually- narcissism explains it. Not alcoholism. As a recovering alcoholic with a narc father, I’m speaking from experience. With that being said, lots of Barca have substance abuse issues because it is hard living THAT life, seeing as how narcissism is a result of parents that didn’t love you or who coddled you to death instead of allowing you to blossom and strengthen like a normal kid.
This is not a woman I want to have a discussion with about anything It feels like 10 years from now she will still feel personally slighted over what happened Pfff... Exhausting
Thank you Peter for continuing to keep us updated on this case. 💗 This prosecutor’s actions are deplorable! At this point, I would be surprised if the judge doesn’t end up sanctioning her.
She keeps saying that Bowles "didnt want" to use the Teske rounds which drives me up a damn wall. She knew about the Teske rounds for 3 YEARS. Bowles had been trying to get her to accept them and test them for 3 YEARS. She stalled until last minute, unilaterally decided they weren't relevant to the case, and Bowles couldn't designate the rounds as exhibits because it was too late. Bowles wanted the Teske rounds the whole damn time, she just kept him from doing so. Either deliberately (probably) or because she really thinks she's the arbiter of what is/isn't relevant evidence. If Bowles didn't want the rounds and thought they were bad for his client, he wouldn't have mentioned them in his recent motion. He wouldn't have clued Baldwin's lawyers in on the existence of the rounds, and he wouldn't go on TV explaining why he "chose" not to call Teske as a witness anymore. Because of what Morrissey did in stalling these rounds being properly examined, calling Teske would have been useless. He might as well call me, random joe schmo, who claims to have received live rounds mixed with dummies from the same batch that was once in possession of Seth Kenney. What good is my testimony worth at that point if nobody can prove it? She knew what she was doing. Bowles wanted the rounds the whole time and she's lying through her teeth. And she has the audacity to say this is different for Hannah because the state wasn't in possession of the rounds prior to trial and arguable Bowles was. Again, she had T H R E E Y E A R S to take possession of the rounds, ignored Bowles' repeated inquiries as to when she's gonna take them, and she waited till it was too late to refuse them. My god. Such a slimy tactic. There's obviously no way to tell if these rounds would be exculpatory to Hannah because they've never been tested by the FBI along with all the other rounds, and this is Morrissey's fault. If they were tested and it turns out that they match, they came from Seth Kenney as a result of him mixing up live rounds after 1883, then yes, its exculpatory because a significant portion of the state's case against Hannah was the argument that Hannah brought the live rounds to the set of Rust despite Seth Kenney being the official supplier of ammunition to the production.
And this folks, is a prime example of how a malignant narcissist acts. It's everyone else's fault, only she knows the truth, even the judge doesn't understand, and she is the victim.
@@lisac2368dude, like 90% of ppl on court tv are narcissists 😜 Sarah, Alec Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez, Chad daybell, Chad doermann, Chris watts, Jodi arias, Amber heard, Kari Morrisey, etc… just like most of the prison population are narcs. It makes sense too. When you’re that entitled and lack empathy, you tend to make some poor choices in life 😂
Just when you think Alec Baldwin could be one of the least likeable people, the prosecutor Kari Morrissey comes in the picture. I just pray that Halyna Hutchins and her family get justice and peace. 😔
As a child of a narcissist parent, I can spot them a mile away. They’re actually fairly common, much more so than ppl think. About 15% of the pop has narcissistic personality disorder and even more have narc traits (source: Dr. Ramani). My point is, Kari is a narc, but so is Baldwin and so is Hannah. They are found in MUCH higher numbers in Hollywood and powerful positions because they’re attracted to the power and notoriety. I can’t believe I’m saying this but I could not STAND Kari and her self righteous narcissism so much that I was fine with seeing Baldwin walk. And I can’t stand him either. But what she did was horrible! And while I believe he played a role, the armories is specifically hired for the job so that other lay people don’t have to be in charge of something so vital. The fact that Keri felt the need to testify and is now doing THIS all but solidified my suspicion that she’s a narcissist. She can’t handle being judged 🤦🏻♀️🙄 meanwhile she acts like she’s super virtuous and has the right to judge others. The hypocrisy is astounding.
It must be hard for defense lawyers to trust a prosecutor who choose here and there what is relevant or what is not and decides on her own to give or not give them ALL the evidence.
I don’t believe Erlinda Johnson left for “self preservation”. Morrisey really sees herself as the lone warrior for justice while everyone around her is lacking. She refuses to be even a little wrong.
I also don't think Erlinda Johnson left for “self preservation.” She didn't know Morrisey was so devious. Johnson is the one who finally turned over all those documents that the defense kept asking for. She was just doing what should have been done in the first place. Then when Morrisey refused to dismiss the case (which was the right thing to do), Johnson resigned because she DID want to dismiss the case. You don't want to have the stink of the 💩show that started with Morrisey on the stand. This motion is like some kind of drunk writing. She should just shut up.
I think her biggest issue was that her poor performance and questionable actions were so public. This seems a lot like a save your face type of thing for me. She should’ve consulted some colleagues or her own attorney before filing this. It only makes me more sure the judge made the right decision and that this case was a reach.
Peter, I agree with you 100% on the difference in this case & the YSL prosecutorial misconduct & why it needs to be rectified. I don’t believe Alec Baldwin should have ever been prosecuted & Morrisey should have never filed this case.
Morrissey is just trying to save face because it was her fault that the case ended in a mistrial with prejudice! Imagine having a case thrown out because of something that you did, and it can never be re-filed again! She knew exactly what she was doing when she asked the detective in cahoots with her to file the evidence under a different case number altogether! She never expected them to figure it out! What a slap in her face! That slap must still be stinging for her to put this bullshit report out after the fact! Morrissey is just trying to salvage what little reputation she has left! She deserved exactly what happened because a prosecutor is supposed to seek justice not win a case at all costs! There was no excuse for what she did and she can say that it was all irrelevant but what the judge did speaks for itself so she can twist and turn it anyway which way she wants and it still comes out that Morrissey = a guilty dirty prosecutor!
This prosecutor for being a defense attorney normally certainly has let her ego take driver seat. it’s ironic that she seems to really go off on Alec Baldwin celebrity status & then turns around and uses that against him. He is a celebrity and it’s not his fault that he’s a celebrity. Her issue with all of his lawyers, maybe it shows that people who have more lawyers can uncover more prosecutorial misconduct. As for what really happened, I will believe that Alec Baldwin actually pulled the trigger, but I will also give him the benefit of the doubt that in that moment, he does not remember pulling the trigger that it was unintentional . And that he went into shock as normal human being would, and then his brain re-created the memory to solidify that he would never have pulled the trigger. It’s not really lying if he believes that is the truth. And she has no evidence to assert anything other than that. She can believe that recklessness somehow caused this to happen. But I think the strongest argument are things that she said during the closing for Hannah Gutierrez. in that closing, she mentions that there were three hours that Hannah had to check those 32 bullets. That specific day Hannah wasn’t pulling double duty, but instead she was only an armorer. Alec Baldwin, from what was filmed seemed to be taking the day very serious because that scene was supposed to be a very serious scene. There is no one who has ever said that that specific day Baldwin was being reckless. I say that because I believe She has done everything to make what she believes happen the narrative, whether or not it’s the truth. I’ve heard a ton of people talking about the safety issues on set, despite the fact that it has nothing to do with the person who was trained to do the job, failing in such an abysmal way. I believe that this prosecutor wanted Alec Baldwin to go to jail, regardless of whether he deserved it. And honestly, I watched that case for Hannah Gutierrez, not only do. I think that judge did the right thing because this prosecutor was shady, while I believe Hannah deserved even more than what she got, I have never believed that Alec Baldwin was guilty for one minute. And I don’t even like Alec Baldwin, but there is nothing that she has said that changes any of the facts. It just provides emotion and there is nothing factual about that.
You don't think the prosecutor has at least 8 staff in the office working on your case at any given time? Because they sure as hell have whatever resources they need for any particular case. So yeah, we all need 8 lawyers to uncover their unfair actions and advantages.
This attorney is a mess! She is unthinkable and though she will not get disbarred she should be! Such self promotion and self justification is inexcusable!
All this attorney cared about was showing her ass to the court and trying to prove how big she was! She thought she could walk in and do whatever the hell she wanted and get away with it! I have to add that it doesn't matter to me whether he is guilty or not at this point! This attorney has gone so far beyond over the boundaries She needs have her license yanked! And I also don't agree with the YSL crap going on either! That judge needed to be yanked off the bench not just out of the courtroom, and this whole thing thrown out and either started fresh or not started at all! You don't get to play fast and loose with the truth and the evidence and throw your ethics out the window to win a case on either side! If that's the case then you might as well just throw a whole entire Justice system down the toilet!
I don't like this attorney's ethics or her behavior! She needs to be disbarred cause apparently she thinks she's above the fray and shouldn't be held accountable for her behavior! This is probably not her first time doing this It's just probably the first time that she's been caught! You don't behave this way overnight!
Sometimes people accept plea deals for things they believe they didnt do without realizing that it can have serious repercussions on current and/or future career options. There can be reasons that it's not always simpler to just accept a plea, no matter how seemingly generous.
I think it’s much easier for people to believe the YSL defendants are guilty, as far as public opinion. But most of all, I think this judge just didn’t give the prosecution so much leeway. Both judges so far with YSL have been waaaaayyyy too patient and given them so many chances to get their shit together.
I started following LYK, with the Hannah Gutierrez 'Rust' trial. It was the first time I followed a trial from the very beginning through to sentencing. I was fascinated (and dare I say impressed) by how Kari Morrisey, the Prosecutor laid out her case with the various witnesses/experts to secure a conviction. Given her performance with HG, I'm surprised of all the mistakes on the Alec Baldwin trial.
She is absolutely ridiculous - look how she comes across - like she knows it all - everyone else is ridiculous - the Judge bent over backwards for her - she was rude and obnoxious - at both trials!!
I actually totally disagree with you on one thing Peter. I think the ammo has no relevance at all to the Baldwin case. The only ammo relevant is his case was the 5 or 6 rounds in the weapon. I think this has much more relevance to Hannah’s case.
This prosecutor is one of very few humans on earth that could possibly make Alec Baldwin look like a sympathetic figure. She’s positively insufferable.
LEO's spiked the case on day one mishandling the crime scene and witnesses with purpose to let him off of a murder charge. The film of him drawing the gun and pulling the trigger would have put anyone else away on murder one alone. This case mishandle ruined the Constitutional process giving the Judge no choice but to dismiss and also gives grounds for the Armorer to appeal and have that prior verdict set aside because the same discovery issue applies. The state waited over a year to bring any charge because they didn't want to have the case in the first place with a famous actor and money any film brings. Only public outcry brought any case forward at all and with such a botched job it seems intended at the state level to fail the case. The LEOs themselves made it impossible for the prosecutor and she was likely selected to fail as she lacked the basics in the whole process on a high profile case.
She is the worst kind of prosecutor. She believes in guilty because she says so, and only cheating by the defense can result in acquittal. She sees every action by defense lawyers as a personal attack on her. She has convinced herself that since she knows the defendant is guilty, anything and everything she does to gain a conviction is morally justified.
Yep, any one of us could get framed and railroaded by the government and, unlike in the cases we can watch here, no one will hear about our case or the injustices in it and we'll go straight to prison. I know several people who have had it happen to them.
Had Bowles called Teske as a witness it most likely would have come out that INDEED he had evidence of matching live rounds that came from Seth PDQ via 1883/Thell Reed linking to Rust.
Honestly I feel like this woman is bringing in her work ethic as a whole, not just in this case, to question. Her complete lack of accountability or even admission of wrong doing on the part of her “coworkers” makes me wonder if this is so normal for her that she feels if she thinks someone is guilty then she’s in the right to do whatever she thinks is necessary to get a guilty verdict rather than follow the letter of the law. Guilty regardless of the jury or court verdict seems to be her motto. She’s digging the hole for her reputation deeper and deeper. God help the next defendant she prosecutes as she’s pulling the gloves off. We need to overhaul the rules and consequences for prosecutors and their teams. These judicial “protectors” should be held to the absolute letter of the law. There should be zero gray areas when it comes to taking away an American citizens freedom. It’s better that 12 guilty men go free than one innocent man’s freedom, liberty and life be taken away from him. It’s not the exact quote but still should be the mandate, the bottom line, the STANDARD for prosecuting people. Even the language of a prosecuters “winning” their case is horrific to me. Justice is not a win/loss. These are peoples lives, their families lives and the confidence of the American people on the line. It’s not a competition. If a jury finds someone not guilty then justice did in fact win. If the jury finds them guilty then justice did indeed win. Prosecutors should not be allowed to share evidence or detailed information with the media for cases that have not been adjudicated. It’s shocking to me that this is allowed by law as it definitely dirties the jury pool one way or another. We KNOW innocent people have gone to prison because of salacious media stories repeated for days, weeks, months or even years before a jury pool has even been sent letters to report for their civic duty. It’s scary to think about being someone falsely accused and charged with a crime when you see so much prosecutorial misconduct at best and blatant violation of law at its worst. The inability to hold corrupt prosecutors accountable does nothing to stem corruption in the judicial system, in fact it seems to encourage it.
Fortunately, she's not normally a prosecutor, and after these two cases, she will never be given the opportunity to be a special prosecutor ever again. I do agree that all prosecutors should be held to a higher standard and their conduct, when unethical, should draw more scrutiny and censure from judges, bar associations, and the public.
Wow. Who would have thought that ANYONE could make Baldwin a sympathetic figure? Welp, she managed to do it. I still think he was guilty of reckless behavior but I don’t know the proper legal charges since I’m not a lawyer. No matter who else did anything, he was the one with his finger on the trigger. I know there are many who disagree and we’re all allowed our opinions.
Hannah Gutierrez admitted in police interviews,I 'USUALLY' check bullets⁉️There's pix of live bullets on RUST set on her lap & actor's holsters forseveral days But for her Halyna would be alive today!
@@MissteryDiva You are correct. And I repeat, no matter who else did anything, he was the one with his finger on the trigger. He was the last link in the chain.
Do you believe anything she has to say? I don’t. She makes herself look as bad as I thought she was. Maybe more. She says he lies when he’s on Tv. Can she be sued also for defamation? Also, I’m not necessarily a fan of Baldwin’s but it seems so obvious she wanted to convict him at any costs. She lost her way. I hope she gets fired. I hope that she is dragged into court many times for her actions and the things she continues to say and may he actually win some lawsuits.
LYK “undisclosed interview with Seth Kenny I thought was a Nothing Burger”. Seth Kenny is the one that should have been charged with the crimes in this case and the prosecution protected and even tried to save him while on the stand but he was to stupid to realize that was what they were doing. No justice in this case when you prosecute the wrong people while being blinded by your own ambitions and protect the guilty parties.
I have a question you might have answered so apologize if that's the case, but would you be open to doing a historical trial watch if there's interest? I know it is tragic this death occurred and cut short a talented woman's life, but I just didn't quite get how quite all the vitriol and passion got infused until it seemed nothing short of getting the pitchforks and torches was going to satisfy people, especially with all the outrage at the dismissal! I know deterrence and punishment are legitimate prongs of justice and two of which I'm generally quite fond, but it seemed here more like the money and resources spent on prosecutions would've been better directed to measures that ensured movies would never again recreate these risky conditions. Yet I think the most infamous and egregious set "accident" in film history is an entirely different story--literally! So, I was wondering what you'd think of doing a historical trial watch, as I said, to go through the issues of the Twilight Zone filming disaster that I'd have saddled up for the pitchfork posse to show up at John Landis' door, and I can't even ride a horse!!! What I am is a military and oral historian working on content about where you really find the "ghosts" of war haunting US (something you don't need a psychic or paranormal meter reader to spot). The more I went into the case, the more I began to find actions so troubling I truly believe John Landis exploited a Vietnam veteran chopper pilot so new to the business that was his first stunt job, went around child hiring practices by making private arrangements, and also perhaps amped the fire/explosion special effects to be far stronger than had been practiced I think was very deliberate and designed purposefully by him to cut out the oversight components so that the left hand was actively obstructed from being able to make contact with what the right was doing so that he could bring alive the nightmarish image in his auteur mind, which he certainly accomplished!!! I'd REALLY like to get some legal input on whether the evidence is there that I see and whether he should have gone to jail for life for DELIBERATE homicide of at least 2nd degree murder charges in taking the lives of a desperate actor in need of work and 2 children. Since there has been a lot of trial footage uploaded, would you be open to an October trial watch for that horror story?!?
********PETER********* Just a quick question - I watched everyday of the Karen Read trial. I would bounce between 3 CZcamsrs; your channel, Melanie Little and The Glarer. If I was able to catch the trial live, I usually watched Melanie Little, if I wasn’t able to catch it live, I would watch your recap of that trial day. When I watched some of The Glarer’s videos I only watched it late at night because he used the “cursey words” as Melanie Little would say, so I waited until my kids were in bed. Anyway - between those 3 CZcamsrs, one thing was asked multiple times on each channel: ‘can Auntie Bev face any sort of disciplinary action for the mishandling of this trial?” You and Melanie Little had the same answer…… No. She is protected by judicial immunity. Is that the case for EVERY judge, in EVERY state???
Alec Baldwin got the best prosecutor! She handed him that dismissal on a silver platter. 😂
she’s a nut
I agree there, she did hand him a win but she can cut the act now if that is what really happened :)
Well, the best prosecutors for Baldwin wouldn’t have pursued charges to begin with. The guy is a A list prick, but I never saw merit in the case against him
She's a gem.
She would be dead certain for hire if she applied in Fulton County - a shoe-in.
Prosecutor needs to get over her self. I think her behavior is atrocious.
Take your cues from the judge Attorney Morrisey, you just KEEP DIGGING!
She comes across as unhinged. Hopefully she never practices law inside a courtroom again. Although maybe she could finish her legacy as being the only prosecutor capable of losing the Sarah Boone case.
@@zsoltszabo6482She was just a special prosecutor brought in for this case, she’s regularly a defense attorney which she may be better suited for. I can see her being a zealous advocate for a client well.
SHE, of all people, has the gall to accuse the defense attorneys of violating the ethical rules of the Bar???
Special Counsel Moorisey is flailing because she knows she is potentially facing some serious sanctions
I think it’s more than that. This was her moment to SHINE!! And take down a mega star on live tv. She was so obsessed with winning that she violated ethics. I think she’s primarily trying to save face, because narcissists care WAY too much about what randos think of them. But yeah, she wants to avoid any and all consequences too.
I think she might be so full of herself that sanctions would actually shock her. Her ego is insane.
This is what Sarah Boone would be like with a law degree, always someone elses fault, and if she is found at fault it was UNINTENTIONAL !!
@@randya430- Exactly, she should then excel at defending herself.
YES! I thought the same thing!
Good one
Be careful talking about Sarah Boone. Peter loves her and takes her side on pretty much everything. He seems soft on her and wants the best for her. He may not take kindly to anything said unflattering towards his Sarah.
except Boone makes actually good points
Is she out of her ever-lovin' mind? Casting doubt on witnesses, prosecutors, and the investigation IS A DEFENSE LAWYER'S JOB! As a shooter, my OPINION is that Baldwin was careless and stupid. That doesn't excuse Morrisey's misbehavior. The judge made the right call. I hope more judges dismiss with prejudice for Brady violations. The DA needs to receive sanctions (aka fines) too.
Only problem is we the people will pay the fines
I was with you until you threw in irrelevant information about the case & Baldwin’s culpability.
This doesn’t come off as a Legal Debate or Argument but rather a Sour Grapes Rant by someone who botched the job. Some times it is better to just say nothing no matter what she thinks.
Why is she fighting? What's the motivation?
She's trying to save face.
Ego and she hopes to minimize the blowback on her career.
She can t take criticism. She can only dish it out.
💯
I'm glad prosecutor Johnson resigned from this case. The ship she was assigned to caught fire, took on water, and is headed straight into a legal storm of hurricane proportions.
😂😂😂😂
Awsome description!
Slaughtering this metaphor, Johnson yelled "fire" and Morissey said it was just harmless smoke.
She handled it like the captain of the Costa Concordia
When the judge got down off the bench to examine the evidence- her goose was deep fried to a crisp!
35:32 These are the reasons I think Tuskee’s ammo matters to Hannah’s case: 1) Yes, it sounds like Bowles knew that Tuskee had ammunition that came from Thell Reed’s batch and was divided between Tuskee and Seth Kinney; HOWEVER, he did NOT realize that ammunition included rounds that MATCHED what killed Halyna. While initially the police and prosecution didn’t know this either, they DID know after examining what Tuskee brought in on March 6. CST Pope testified that Morrisey and Hancock were at the courthouse IN HG’s trial. I’m really curious what time this all happened, but assuming it was during business hours, this ammo came in either during closing arguments or while the jury was deliberating. CST Pope looked at and logged all the ammunition in and per her testimony she DID recognize that there were brass Starline bullets with silver primers. So technically this evidence was turned in DURING not after HGs case, and while Pope called and spoke to Hancock and Morrisey about this ammunition drop-off, no one notified Bowles (not even sure how that process works on the last day of trial or during jury deliberations…can lawyers make emergency motions regarding new evidence and you suspend jury deliberations?). 2) HG may have been convicted because of her cumulative negligence as seen by the jurors. The state’s case was that HG was the only one who had access to these brass starlight rounds with silver primers. So she brought the ammo on set which we will never know but for some jurors may have been the biggest offense in her negligence, and she additionally didn’t safeguard or check for live vs dummy rounds in the gun that day. Tuskee having matching ammo provides reasonable doubt that HG was the only possible source for the live rounds on set. Seth Kinney agrees that he was with Thell Reed and Tuskee for the 1883 gun training and he also corroborated to police that yes, he and Tuskee split up Thell’s ammo and both took some, and he even said that he took this ammo back to the PDQ warehouse. This is pretty huge, because that means if Tuskee had rounds that matched the fatal bullet, and both he and Seth agree that their rounds came from the same batch, then the jury could have found that Seth Kinney ALSO had those brass rounds with silver primers and thus HE could have been the source for the live ammo on set, not HG. This could have totally changed how jurors evaluated HGs culpability in what happened that day.
Morrissey, the CSI woman and the lead detective went through so much trouble to hide that ammo for a reason. The judge knew exactly why. Which is why she looked so closely at it herself.
It's also really weird for a prosecutor to do that. Usually when prosecutors hide exculpatory evidence they tuck it safely away in their case files. So they can ease their consciences by saying "well at least the defendant's appellate lawyers can use it for appeal."
I think that's what got the judge really pissed off. There's a culture in the courts that it's one thing to not turn over exculpatory evidence. But it's a whole nother to hide evidence permanently like that.
There's this weird thing where they don't believe prosecutors should have to lose every single time some defendant happens to be innocent. You know that would hurt a prosecutor's career. Hurt the DA's election chances.
So they see not turning over exculpatory evidence as very different than actually hiding the evidence like this.
Yes the investigator knew bcos there if you read the Judge written ruling, she disclosed there was a supplemental report done that explicitly said the troy teske(?) rounds matched the HG rounds on set. So they knew.. this report was never brought up on trial or disclosed to media until this ruling.
So the judge knew right away that they lied on the stand when the CST said that the rounda “obviously” didnt match. And this was an answer elicited by Morrisey via leading question so it was very very suspicious.
Morrisey probably knew that they were lying and the rounds DID match because: (1) she was there when they had a meeting deciding to file it in a diff case file; (2) it’s highly unlikely she never read that report; (3) she lead CST to answer on stand that the rounds “obviously didnt match”; and (4) out of all the reports and evidence filed on rust, this is the ONLY ONE report/evidence they “deemed” irrelevant to the case and filed on a separate doc file
That seems more and more like malicious / intentional misconduct to me.
Why did the state just look at Seth Kenney & PDQ and shrug
The imploding Narcissist. This is their M.O. When they are cornered and know they've been caught, they go mad like a rabid badger.
Wow. This lady is a piece of work. This just scares me for those who’ve been prosecuted by here before her unlawful practices came to us the public. I think we have some narcissistic personality going on.
The only remaining mystery is why this prosecutor is so hell bent on convicting Baldwin. At some point for her this case became PERSONAL.
Propably wanted a career boost from putting a famous person behind bars. And to be fair, a better prosecutor _could_ have made a case, though propably not as bad as this one tried to. But in the end i agree with the judge, the prosecution handled things so messily that i doubt there would have been a fair trial even with another team.
Could just be personal bias against Baldwin. I mean just look at how worked up a lot of conservatives are getting over this. Prosecutors aren't immune from the same biases we're all subject to.
@@tewks4458I don’t think that this is political. I am not a fan of Alec Baldwin but the prosecutors actions were outrageous and the judge did the right thing, imo.
Yeah, and making it personal, like a personal vendetta, is very unprofessional, ask any lawyer.
because she is right. simple.
Rewatch crew here. Thank you Peter for this update.
I’m confused. These documents sound like the case is still ongoing. Hasn’t it been completely dismissed with prejudice. Are there separate charges where double jeopardy doesn’t apply?
This is my reaction as well. Why is any of this relevant now?
I'm confused too lol What's the point? Is there another charge they're going for?
For Baldwin, not Gutierrez-Reed
She is venting and trying to save her career nothing is pending except Hannah Gutierrez is.
Sanctions please, for this toxic prosecutor. The thing is, what she did was unethical and really not very smart. I have chatted with a couple of attorneys since the trial and they said trying to hide evidence under a different case number is 'amateur hour' and no ethical DA would ever do that. I'm no expert, just saying attorneys seem to side with Baldwin's legal team on what happened and most definitely agree with the judge's determination.
I can't believe whoever proof-read this paper for her didn't say, "Uhhhhhh are you sure you want to release this? It's not really a good look for our side."
maybe they did..doesn't mean she would listen
A good writer has another person read it, comment, and then send it. She needs to be disbarred.
You do not tell a narcissist what they can and can’t do. They do what they want. Then they play the victim when it goes badly lol.
I’ve said it before, she gives me drinking on the job vibes
You’ve got a good point there.
wow....ive never had a feeling so accurately click. Thats exactly what i couldnt put my finger on haha
\o/ .. Mega-pint
I was wondering the exact same thing. How else can one explain her behavior?
@@OldLadyBakesactually- narcissism explains it. Not alcoholism. As a recovering alcoholic with a narc father, I’m speaking from experience. With that being said, lots of Barca have substance abuse issues because it is hard living THAT life, seeing as how narcissism is a result of parents that didn’t love you or who coddled you to death instead of allowing you to blossom and strengthen like a normal kid.
This is not a woman I want to have a discussion with about anything
It feels like 10 years from now she will still feel personally slighted over what happened
Pfff... Exhausting
We need more sassy Peter! I am living for this!
Thank you Peter for continuing to keep us updated on this case. 💗 This prosecutor’s actions are deplorable! At this point, I would be surprised if the judge doesn’t end up sanctioning her.
She keeps saying that Bowles "didnt want" to use the Teske rounds which drives me up a damn wall. She knew about the Teske rounds for 3 YEARS. Bowles had been trying to get her to accept them and test them for 3 YEARS. She stalled until last minute, unilaterally decided they weren't relevant to the case, and Bowles couldn't designate the rounds as exhibits because it was too late.
Bowles wanted the Teske rounds the whole damn time, she just kept him from doing so. Either deliberately (probably) or because she really thinks she's the arbiter of what is/isn't relevant evidence.
If Bowles didn't want the rounds and thought they were bad for his client, he wouldn't have mentioned them in his recent motion. He wouldn't have clued Baldwin's lawyers in on the existence of the rounds, and he wouldn't go on TV explaining why he "chose" not to call Teske as a witness anymore. Because of what Morrissey did in stalling these rounds being properly examined, calling Teske would have been useless. He might as well call me, random joe schmo, who claims to have received live rounds mixed with dummies from the same batch that was once in possession of Seth Kenney. What good is my testimony worth at that point if nobody can prove it? She knew what she was doing. Bowles wanted the rounds the whole time and she's lying through her teeth.
And she has the audacity to say this is different for Hannah because the state wasn't in possession of the rounds prior to trial and arguable Bowles was. Again, she had T H R E E Y E A R S to take possession of the rounds, ignored Bowles' repeated inquiries as to when she's gonna take them, and she waited till it was too late to refuse them. My god. Such a slimy tactic.
There's obviously no way to tell if these rounds would be exculpatory to Hannah because they've never been tested by the FBI along with all the other rounds, and this is Morrissey's fault. If they were tested and it turns out that they match, they came from Seth Kenney as a result of him mixing up live rounds after 1883, then yes, its exculpatory because a significant portion of the state's case against Hannah was the argument that Hannah brought the live rounds to the set of Rust despite Seth Kenney being the official supplier of ammunition to the production.
Morrisey might go down as one of the most hated prosecutors IMO
Hat off to the judge in this case! She was 'gutsy'!
And this folks, is a prime example of how a malignant narcissist acts. It's everyone else's fault, only she knows the truth, even the judge doesn't understand, and she is the victim.
Sounds like Sarah Boone!!!
The judge was certainly not a happy camper when the truth of the shenanigans was revealed.
@@lisac2368absolutely what I was thinking (and I’m a counselor)
@@lisac2368dude, like 90% of ppl on court tv are narcissists 😜 Sarah, Alec Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez, Chad daybell, Chad doermann, Chris watts, Jodi arias, Amber heard, Kari Morrisey, etc… just like most of the prison population are narcs. It makes sense too. When you’re that entitled and lack empathy, you tend to make some poor choices in life 😂
People describing themselves as gracious are much like those who describethemselves as humble.
Sheer irony that this prosecutor is throwing out the term, “histrionic!”
Narcissist they usually project themselves on the other side. Whatever they accuse them they are that. Actually it’s very pathetic.
KM keeps digging her hole deeper by ranting about the judge. Excited to see the next hearing and what Judge Sommer does.
Just when you think Alec Baldwin could be one of the least likeable people, the prosecutor Kari Morrissey comes in the picture. I just pray that Halyna Hutchins and her family get justice and peace. 😔
This woman can’t help herself. She has to have the last word.
Morrissey complaining about Baldwin’s use of the media is hysterical, considering how much she spoke to News outlets at the start.
As a child of a narcissist parent, I can spot them a mile away. They’re actually fairly common, much more so than ppl think. About 15% of the pop has narcissistic personality disorder and even more have narc traits (source: Dr. Ramani). My point is, Kari is a narc, but so is Baldwin and so is Hannah. They are found in MUCH higher numbers in Hollywood and powerful positions because they’re attracted to the power and notoriety. I can’t believe I’m saying this but I could not STAND Kari and her self righteous narcissism so much that I was fine with seeing Baldwin walk. And I can’t stand him either. But what she did was horrible! And while I believe he played a role, the armories is specifically hired for the job so that other lay people don’t have to be in charge of something so vital. The fact that Keri felt the need to testify and is now doing THIS all but solidified my suspicion that she’s a narcissist. She can’t handle being judged 🤦🏻♀️🙄 meanwhile she acts like she’s super virtuous and has the right to judge others. The hypocrisy is astounding.
How does this prosecutor still contend that it’s up to her to determine what is or is not exculpatory evidence?
It must be hard for defense lawyers to trust a prosecutor who choose here and there what is relevant or what is not and decides on her own to give or not give them ALL the evidence.
I don’t believe Erlinda Johnson left for “self preservation”. Morrisey really sees herself as the lone warrior for justice while everyone around her is lacking. She refuses to be even a little wrong.
I also don't think Erlinda Johnson left for “self preservation.” She didn't know Morrisey was so devious. Johnson is the one who finally turned over all those documents that the defense kept asking for. She was just doing what should have been done in the first place. Then when Morrisey refused to dismiss the case (which was the right thing to do), Johnson resigned because she DID want to dismiss the case. You don't want to have the stink of the 💩show that started with Morrisey on the stand. This motion is like some kind of drunk writing. She should just shut up.
@@saharaussery6799 lol like drunk dialling the court
I cannot believe the prosecuter doesn't think she did anything wrong.
Chiming in here for the Oceangate suit! Looks interesting! Please cover!
I think her biggest issue was that her poor performance and questionable actions were so public. This seems a lot like a save your face type of thing for me. She should’ve consulted some colleagues or her own attorney before filing this. It only makes me more sure the judge made the right decision and that this case was a reach.
Peter, thank you for covering this.
I'm not a lawyer but luv listening to u my mom is a corporate lawyer
Rewatch crew here! Thank you Peter! 🎉
Okay. Someone asked the same question. Thanks for the clarity.
Peter, I agree with you 100% on the difference in this case & the YSL prosecutorial misconduct & why it needs to be rectified. I don’t believe Alec Baldwin should have ever been prosecuted & Morrisey should have never filed this case.
Morrissey is just trying to save face because it was her fault that the case ended in a mistrial with prejudice! Imagine having a case thrown out because of something that you did, and it can never be re-filed again! She knew exactly what she was doing when she asked the detective in cahoots with her to file the evidence under a different case number altogether! She never expected them to figure it out! What a slap in her face! That slap must still be stinging for her to put this bullshit report out after the fact! Morrissey is just trying to salvage what little reputation she has left! She deserved exactly what happened because a prosecutor is supposed to seek justice not win a case at all costs! There was no excuse for what she did and she can say that it was all irrelevant but what the judge did speaks for itself so she can twist and turn it anyway which way she wants and it still comes out that Morrissey = a guilty dirty prosecutor!
This prosecutor for being a defense attorney normally certainly has let her ego take driver seat. it’s ironic that she seems to really go off on Alec Baldwin celebrity status & then turns around and uses that against him. He is a celebrity and it’s not his fault that he’s a celebrity. Her issue with all of his lawyers, maybe it shows that people who have more lawyers can uncover more prosecutorial misconduct.
As for what really happened, I will believe that Alec Baldwin actually pulled the trigger, but I will also give him the benefit of the doubt that in that moment, he does not remember pulling the trigger that it was unintentional . And that he went into shock as normal human being would, and then his brain re-created the memory to solidify that he would never have pulled the trigger. It’s not really lying if he believes that is the truth. And she has no evidence to assert anything other than that.
She can believe that recklessness somehow caused this to happen. But I think the strongest argument are things that she said during the closing for Hannah Gutierrez. in that closing, she mentions that there were three hours that Hannah had to check those 32 bullets. That specific day Hannah wasn’t pulling double duty, but instead she was only an armorer. Alec Baldwin, from what was filmed seemed to be taking the day very serious because that scene was supposed to be a very serious scene. There is no one who has ever said that that specific day Baldwin was being reckless.
I say that because I believe She has done everything to make what she believes happen the narrative, whether or not it’s the truth. I’ve heard a ton of people talking about the safety issues on set, despite the fact that it has nothing to do with the person who was trained to do the job, failing in such an abysmal way. I believe that this prosecutor wanted Alec Baldwin to go to jail, regardless of whether he deserved it. And honestly, I watched that case for Hannah Gutierrez, not only do. I think that judge did the right thing because this prosecutor was shady, while I believe Hannah deserved even more than what she got, I have never believed that Alec Baldwin was guilty for one minute. And I don’t even like Alec Baldwin, but there is nothing that she has said that changes any of the facts. It just provides emotion and there is nothing factual about that.
Morrisey is unhinged.
You don't think the prosecutor has at least 8 staff in the office working on your case at any given time? Because they sure as hell have whatever resources they need for any particular case. So yeah, we all need 8 lawyers to uncover their unfair actions and advantages.
Peter, pick whatever case you want! We love daily trial coverage :):)):):)::):);)
I don’t understand how this is still an issue when his case was dismissed with prejudice???
@@PurpleMyrtle these are motions to get Hannah the armorer released from jail
This prosecutor Morrissey is begging for a lawsuit against her
Morrissey reminds me of one of those annoying teachers pets that tells on all the other kids haha
This attorney is a mess! She is unthinkable and though she will not get disbarred she should be! Such self promotion and self justification is inexcusable!
Yay for covering the Daybell trial!
All this attorney cared about was showing her ass to the court and trying to prove how big she was! She thought she could walk in and do whatever the hell she wanted and get away with it! I have to add that it doesn't matter to me whether he is guilty or not at this point! This attorney has gone so far beyond over the boundaries She needs have her license yanked! And I also don't agree with the YSL crap going on either! That judge needed to be yanked off the bench not just out of the courtroom, and this whole thing thrown out and either started fresh or not started at all! You don't get to play fast and loose with the truth and the evidence and throw your ethics out the window to win a case on either side! If that's the case then you might as well just throw a whole entire Justice system down the toilet!
I don't like this attorney's ethics or her behavior! She needs to be disbarred cause apparently she thinks she's above the fray and shouldn't be held accountable for her behavior! This is probably not her first time doing this It's just probably the first time that she's been caught! You don't behave this way overnight!
I have not despised a prosecutor so much in my life.
She is spot on about Baldwin!!
Morrissey missed the class where it is explained that if you find yourself in a hole you need to quit digging.
Sometimes people accept plea deals for things they believe they didnt do without realizing that it can have serious repercussions on current and/or future career options. There can be reasons that it's not always simpler to just accept a plea, no matter how seemingly generous.
I think it’s much easier for people to believe the YSL defendants are guilty, as far as public opinion. But most of all, I think this judge just didn’t give the prosecution so much leeway. Both judges so far with YSL have been waaaaayyyy too patient and given them so many chances to get their shit together.
I started following LYK, with the Hannah Gutierrez 'Rust' trial. It was the first time I followed a trial from the very beginning through to sentencing. I was fascinated (and dare I say impressed) by how Kari Morrisey, the Prosecutor laid out her case with the various witnesses/experts to secure a conviction. Given her performance with HG, I'm surprised of all the mistakes on the Alec Baldwin trial.
@@KristaH-g2x or perhaps she was not as honest in the first trial- but nobody realized it?🤷🏻♀️
She is absolutely ridiculous - look how she comes across - like she knows it all - everyone else is ridiculous - the Judge bent over backwards for her - she was rude and obnoxious - at both trials!!
Silent watcher. Love your content. Thank you for all you do.
Yay! Looks like Whitney does such a GREAT job buying ur shirts ! Maybe she can do a live on where she gets them ❤💕
Apparently he does his own shopping 🎉
She has lost all credibility and is grasping at straws now. She's desperate. This just makes her sound petulant to me.
I actually totally disagree with you on one thing Peter. I think the ammo has no relevance at all to the Baldwin case. The only ammo relevant is his case was the 5 or 6 rounds in the weapon. I think this has much more relevance to Hannah’s case.
Yup I agree
Compare this to YSL,and that case is moving forward?
No one knows if the ammo is relevant or not because the prosecution hid it from the defense.
With regards to Hannah, it doesn't matter where the Ammo came from. It was her job to check every single round.
It would be relevant to Seth Kenney’s case….oh wait….
Why am I hearing "Give em the ole razzle dazzle' in my head while you're reading this ?
This prosecutor is one of very few humans on earth that could possibly make Alec Baldwin look like a sympathetic figure. She’s positively insufferable.
LEO's spiked the case on day one mishandling the crime scene and witnesses with purpose to let him off of a murder charge. The film of him drawing the gun and pulling the trigger would have put anyone else away on murder one alone. This case mishandle ruined the Constitutional process giving the Judge no choice but to dismiss and also gives grounds for the Armorer to appeal and have that prior verdict set aside because the same discovery issue applies. The state waited over a year to bring any charge because they didn't want to have the case in the first place with a famous actor and money any film brings. Only public outcry brought any case forward at all and with such a botched job it seems intended at the state level to fail the case. The LEOs themselves made it impossible for the prosecutor and she was likely selected to fail as she lacked the basics in the whole process on a high profile case.
She is the worst kind of prosecutor. She believes in guilty because she says so, and only cheating by the defense can result in acquittal. She sees every action by defense lawyers as a personal attack on her. She has convinced herself that since she knows the defendant is guilty, anything and everything she does to gain a conviction is morally justified.
She needs to sit down. Making it worse for herself..
Wow, this woman takes the cake.
Man this channel sure has changed over the past 6 months. Wild.
Yep, any one of us could get framed and railroaded by the government and, unlike in the cases we can watch here, no one will hear about our case or the injustices in it and we'll go straight to prison. I know several people who have had it happen to them.
Wait did Peter see the response from the judge?! I desperately want to see him react to that!
“Clip”. You are so funny, Peter!
I hate that I missed Runkle being in the chat. Love Peter and Runkle discussing the law!
This is my FAVORITE channel ❤
Had Bowles called Teske as a witness it most likely would have come out that INDEED he had evidence of matching live rounds that came from Seth PDQ via 1883/Thell Reed linking to Rust.
I thought that prosecutor was barred from these cases.
The DA did poorly but Baldwin was guilty, she handed him a get out of jail free card smdh
Thanks Peter.
Honestly I feel like this woman is bringing in her work ethic as a whole, not just in this case, to question. Her complete lack of accountability or even admission of wrong doing on the part of her “coworkers” makes me wonder if this is so normal for her that she feels if she thinks someone is guilty then she’s in the right to do whatever she thinks is necessary to get a guilty verdict rather than follow the letter of the law. Guilty regardless of the jury or court verdict seems to be her motto.
She’s digging the hole for her reputation deeper and deeper.
God help the next defendant she prosecutes as she’s pulling the gloves off.
We need to overhaul the rules and consequences for prosecutors and their teams. These judicial “protectors” should be held to the absolute letter of the law. There should be zero gray areas when it comes to taking away an American citizens freedom.
It’s better that 12 guilty men go free than one innocent man’s freedom, liberty and life be taken away from him.
It’s not the exact quote but still should be the mandate, the bottom line, the STANDARD for prosecuting people.
Even the language of a prosecuters “winning” their case is horrific to me. Justice is not a win/loss. These are peoples lives, their families lives and the confidence of the American people on the line. It’s not a competition. If a jury finds someone not guilty then justice did in fact win. If the jury finds them guilty then justice did indeed win.
Prosecutors should not be allowed to share evidence or detailed information with the media for cases that have not been adjudicated. It’s shocking to me that this is allowed by law as it definitely dirties the jury pool one way or another. We KNOW innocent people have gone to prison because of salacious media stories repeated for days, weeks, months or even years before a jury pool has even been sent letters to report for their civic duty.
It’s scary to think about being someone falsely accused and charged with a crime when you see so much prosecutorial misconduct at best and blatant violation of law at its worst.
The inability to hold corrupt prosecutors accountable does nothing to stem corruption in the judicial system, in fact it seems to encourage it.
Fortunately, she's not normally a prosecutor, and after these two cases, she will never be given the opportunity to be a special prosecutor ever again.
I do agree that all prosecutors should be held to a higher standard and their conduct, when unethical, should draw more scrutiny and censure from judges, bar associations, and the public.
thanks for the chapters
Isn’t what she is saying, calling Baldwin a liar slander or defamation?
Wow. Who would have thought that ANYONE could make Baldwin a sympathetic figure? Welp, she managed to do it. I still think he was guilty of reckless behavior but I don’t know the proper legal charges since I’m not a lawyer. No matter who else did anything, he was the one with his finger on the trigger. I know there are many who disagree and we’re all allowed our opinions.
Hannah Gutierrez admitted in police interviews,I 'USUALLY' check bullets⁉️There's pix of live bullets on RUST set on her lap & actor's holsters forseveral days But for her Halyna would be alive today!
@@MissteryDiva You are correct. And I repeat, no matter who else did anything, he was the one with his finger on the trigger. He was the last link in the chain.
Didn't Morrisey do a deal with that Armourer that told Hannah not to get a lawyer????
Addleson, Richins, Read cases please. And Telles
IF she had not flushed her career previously, this will likely press the handle on it.
Excellent review!
Your just great, Peter!
Great coverage
Do you believe anything she has to say? I don’t. She makes herself look as bad as I thought she was. Maybe more. She says he lies when he’s on Tv. Can she be sued also for defamation? Also, I’m not necessarily a fan of Baldwin’s but it seems so obvious she wanted to convict him at any costs. She lost her way. I hope she gets fired. I hope that she is dragged into court many times for her actions and the things she continues to say and may he actually win some lawsuits.
Regardless of how I feel about this case, I've never seen a more unprofessional prosecutor! She's despicable.
LYK “undisclosed interview with Seth Kenny I thought was a Nothing Burger”. Seth Kenny is the one that should have been charged with the crimes in this case and the prosecution protected and even tried to save him while on the stand but he was to stupid to realize that was what they were doing. No justice in this case when you prosecute the wrong people while being blinded by your own ambitions and protect the guilty parties.
Morrisey: How dare defendants defend themselves. How dare they question my authortah!
I have a question you might have answered so apologize if that's the case, but would you be open to doing a historical trial watch if there's interest? I know it is tragic this death occurred and cut short a talented woman's life, but I just didn't quite get how quite all the vitriol and passion got infused until it seemed nothing short of getting the pitchforks and torches was going to satisfy people, especially with all the outrage at the dismissal! I know deterrence and punishment are legitimate prongs of justice and two of which I'm generally quite fond, but it seemed here more like the money and resources spent on prosecutions would've been better directed to measures that ensured movies would never again recreate these risky conditions. Yet I think the most infamous and egregious set "accident" in film history is an entirely different story--literally! So, I was wondering what you'd think of doing a historical trial watch, as I said, to go through the issues of the Twilight Zone filming disaster that I'd have saddled up for the pitchfork posse to show up at John Landis' door, and I can't even ride a horse!!! What I am is a military and oral historian working on content about where you really find the "ghosts" of war haunting US (something you don't need a psychic or paranormal meter reader to spot). The more I went into the case, the more I began to find actions so troubling I truly believe John Landis exploited a Vietnam veteran chopper pilot so new to the business that was his first stunt job, went around child hiring practices by making private arrangements, and also perhaps amped the fire/explosion special effects to be far stronger than had been practiced I think was very deliberate and designed purposefully by him to cut out the oversight components so that the left hand was actively obstructed from being able to make contact with what the right was doing so that he could bring alive the nightmarish image in his auteur mind, which he certainly accomplished!!! I'd REALLY like to get some legal input on whether the evidence is there that I see and whether he should have gone to jail for life for DELIBERATE homicide of at least 2nd degree murder charges in taking the lives of a desperate actor in need of work and 2 children. Since there has been a lot of trial footage uploaded, would you be open to an October trial watch for that horror story?!?
I don't like Baldwin, but this borders on defamation. I hope he sues the crap out of her.
Grape Rush Celsius nice choice! One of my products appreciate the business!
I don’t know what’s up with my phone. I had to go back to your page and reset my notifications for all. It’s crazy.
********PETER*********
Just a quick question - I watched everyday of the Karen Read trial. I would bounce between 3 CZcamsrs; your channel, Melanie Little and The Glarer. If I was able to catch the trial live, I usually watched Melanie Little, if I wasn’t able to catch it live, I would watch your recap of that trial day. When I watched some of The Glarer’s videos I only watched it late at night because he used the “cursey words” as Melanie Little would say, so I waited until my kids were in bed. Anyway - between those 3 CZcamsrs, one thing was asked multiple times on each channel: ‘can Auntie Bev face any sort of disciplinary action for the mishandling of this trial?” You and Melanie Little had the same answer…… No. She is protected by judicial immunity. Is that the case for EVERY judge, in EVERY state???