@@benedictsmith9112 Hannibal wasn't scared of anything ,. His father made him swear to be an enemy of rome on blood for the rest of his life , he marched a whole army to Italy through the alpes which he lost nearly half of , He stayed in their Land for 14 years never lost a Battle to them with a single army and without any reinforcements from Carthage other than The galic tribes nor supplies from his country living of the land , he won major victories against them , Even once they encircled him in a valley he marched through the darkness of night while making them chase Fire attached to horns of cattle and then later Ambushed the Roman detachment sent to ambush him , He ambushed a whole roman army at trasimane which till this day remains the biggest and most successful ambush in the history of warfare , He won an unbelievable Victory at cannea outnumbered till the last moments of the battle , Fighting in the front with his men with one eye which resulted in the greatest Loss of humane life in a single day through the history of battles and warfare , He is the General that is more intimidating and Greater then even some kings Napoleon really considered him one of the best tacticians and he truly was , he made the rommans live in fear for 14 years , he didn't need the Great of The Conqueror added to his name , His name was enough to make anyone have chills Hannibal Barca , He was Basically fighting Rome AloneAnd he made them take The L For 14 years and on their own land never has a general Humiliated rome more,If the garbage Carthaginian Senate Supported Him With The Fresh Troops and Supplies and seige engines He requested After His victory at Cannea there would be no Rome
@@mason-masonsminecraftmason2756 "Blessing" we call it when it dose NOT: force itself on everyone around them (and killing the rest.), replace other cultures with their own, change its own religion influenced by Christian cultists, end up causing countless deaths in the name of their "one true god" and give birth to many smaller racist colonialist nations that end up first enslaving even more cultures and civilizations, then do a 180 and act all "humane" just because they are a democracy and remain dominant today to force their agendas on the rest of the world. Rome is literally the root of all the problems we face today.
He didn't have enough men and resources to do it... And like it or not even he knew about the Roman determination... It's not like they will surrender or anything they will fight till the last man
@@buzzkill36 Well, it was a goofy decision from Hannibal not to march on Rome after the victory at Trasimene. A goofy decision that, after the war, Hannibal himself admitted was a missed opportunity. There are two reasons that historians suggest might have been the reason that Hannibal didn't destroy Rome after Trasimene: 1) "He couldn't have because of his lack of resources, men, supplies, etc." - but that was long disproven because, near Rome, there wandered a Roman navy of 30 ships. Formidable, right? Carthage had a fleet of 70 ships nearby. Hannibal could have done a sea-land operation, one with his main army, and one with Carthage's fleet, to destroy Rome. Additionally, he did have enough men. The most Rome could recruit to defend the then small city was about 10k men. About 2 legions of men. That would not have been enough for the approximate 45k army of the Carthaginians. Hannibal could've breached Rome and wiped it off of the face of the Earth - he simple could have. Rome was in a crisis, and its legions were all too far away to help. In total, Rome had 6-8 active legions across the Western Mediterranean. Only 2 could arrive immediately in time before Hannibal could have arrived. 2) "He was influenced by Greek Hellenistic thinking" - the more likely reasoning. In Hellenistic thinking, it was the idea that, in war, you should beat your opponent in battle over and over again so that they fairly surrendered, not being able to fight anymore. It is likely that Hannibal believed this rather than razing Rome, even though that is what he initially wanted before starting the war. 3) My theory: His focus diverged - as great as Hannibal was, I think his focus diverged onto the next nice looking thing, which is going down to Southern Italy and getting more plunder and supplies and allies. Like instant gratification. Whereas Rome was focused throughout the entire war. They knew what they wanted - remove Carthage out of Iberia and take it for themselves, maintain Corsica, Sardinia and Italy and protect the eternal city.
He. probably Could Have Taken Rome, Gaul,Greece,And All Mediterranean lands If he was Supported by The Garbage Carthaginian senate or was The Emperor of Carthage Himself
the Things Hannibal Done and achieved Scipio Could Only Dream Off, when Scipio Defeated Hannibal at zama Hannibal's army was poorly trained and consisted of many elderly and inexperienced troops while Scipio lead the best army rome had to offer then his legionars served under him for long and were experienced and fir fighting machines, and Hannibal was also Betrayed by His Numidian Cavalry and their leader that's the main reason he lost not due to any leadership skills from Scipio or because Scipio was a better general and a tactician than Hannibal, Hannibal>>> Scipio' That isn't an opinion that's a fact
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 Pffft, yeah right Rome still lasted for 2000 years and C*rthage never left any legacy. Scipio was also never defeated and even campaigned in the east as well. And lets not forget, time to bring the salt, boys! CARTHAGO DELENDA EST! HAHA!
No Idea Man The Whole Edit Was made by my friend Ya4ze but sadly his tiktok account was banned for no reason, luckily i had saved this edit on my phone, Just search for the effect on YT Im pretty sure you will find out how it's done
@@god6326he is kinda right...Scipio was a genius himself...One of the best ever but still Hannibal has the edge...What he did at cannae was IMPOSSIBLE
I know im a Muslim Khalid Ibn Al Walid is the best general ever but he was never a ruler brother he was a commander, it was Abu Bakr and Omar who ruled Over him
They didn't have plot armour...Romans just NEVER accepted defeat...They were as gritty as one can possibly be...Hannibal defeated them everytime BUT ONE and that turned out to be the defeat of Carthage...Even after Cannae Romans didn't even consider surrender they started preparing for a siege....Carthage could never have defeated Rome
@@buzzkill36 Romans were the USSR of that time. USSR recruited 15% of its entire massive 250+ million people population in WW2. Rome pretty much did the same, except the relative percentage was larger. They just spammed the recruit button over and over again. It is true, though, the Romans never gave up. It is honestly very impressive to see such determination.
Yeah Sadly Carthage Was Given a General of Great Caliber He could've expanded their empire many times over if only they supported him and were focused on military matters more than trade, Imagine if Hannibal wasn't just a general if he was the emperor or king of Carthage he would Litterally conquer Rome and add it to his empire and then expand even more creating a strong Barcid Dynasty that would rule for decades or centuries, his story is really sad he had so much potential it was his country that let him down
He also lost his brothers during the war.Hamilcar Barca (Hannibal’s dad)felt betrayed by the weak politicians when they surrendered Carthage had a menace but they stabbed him,if they gave him the reinforcements there would’ve been no Rome and no Roman Empire
@@Holybatman3603 Carthage definitely. Almohads were just another faction within Islamic civilization while Carthage was Phoenician civilization in its totality.
Scipio grew up studying Hannibal's tactics. It took 16 years of campaigning for him to learn how to defeat Hannibal. And what was amiss in Hannibal's warfare waging? The fact that Carthage didn't buckle down Numidia and Spain properly, making these two states quickly switch to Rome's side.
@@Holybatman3603 do you realize hannibal is from an aristocratic family and not a regular carthaginian passing by the street. Carthaginians (which called themselves Kananim-Phoenician) were extremely racist and would not approve marriages with foreigners. Especially noble class were known to marry inside the ethnicity. So he is a middle eastern person while his people were half north african.
Im Also Algerian and Yeah Alexander Is Better But you Have To Understand Alexander Had Ultimate Power and authority And was King Of Greece And Directed All Of Greece's Ressources and warmachine Against The Persian Empire and he was Fighting With the Best Drilled and Experienced Army In the World at that time and His Army was Mostly All Greeks So Spoke Same language had same fighting styles and Tactics and therefore easier to Command, On The Other Hand Hannibal Barca Didn't Have The Same Power and Control Over Carthage's Ressources and Might Wether On Political or Military level and Had to Cope With Garbage Wealthy Beraucratic leaders Who Had Put their Own Interests First Over The inrests of Carthage It's Army and Most importantly it's Army ,Many of them were Corrupt as well and they were The Main Reason Carthage Lost The Second punic war ,And You Also Have To Remember That Hannibal Was fighting With a mixed ethnicity army of thousands of men from different Regions with different Languages and Fighting Styles ,he Had Spanish,Gauls, Carthaginians,Numidians and he still somehow maintained them as an effective fighting force without any records of a rebilion or anything like it And Was Fighting the Best Trained and Drilled Force Of his Time and he managed To Keep threatening Rome's very existence with a single army on their own land for 15 years after Humiliating the Romans and killing or capturing+170k of their total male population he was Also Way batter At Ambushes than alexander,Had Hannibal Had the Power and Authority That Alexander Had He would Have done Many More Greater Things For Carthage and For his legacy
@@markherron1407 No he wasn't lmao, stop creating black characters just because you want to. Hannibal was Phoenician which makes him middle Eastern. Not all North Africans are black because it's Africa but there's Berbers who lives in North Western Africa who are white-light skinned people. Carthage was a phoenician colony and most High ranking people like Hannibal were middle eastern looking.
no he wasn't? he was African, but not black the upper classes of Carthage were Phoenicians, and so was Hannibal he had the same skin colour as a current day man in Jordan
@@obscurekidney501 there is no proof to say he is Jordanian .but there is proof to claim is black because archeologists have discovered a coin with face of Hannibal and the elephant he road (surus) in north Italy trasimin.
A genius who got betrayed by everyone
Except his own troops and mercenaries, as well as his brothers.
Only because he was betrayed by the Carthaginian senate
@@noufalpanakkad6585 Just like his father.
至少迦太基国王在被罗马要挟把那位破坏条约的将军的头送去罗马的时候，他站在了他忠诚的将军那一边。不然我们就永远无法知道汉尼拔了。
yeah fuck hano
One of the greatest military minds to ever exist
Rome's biggest enemy
and very bold
Still took the L
@@benedictsmith9112 ye
@@benedictsmith9112 Hannibal wasn't scared of anything ,. His father made him swear to be an enemy of rome on blood for the rest of his life , he marched a whole army to Italy through the alpes which he lost nearly half of , He stayed in their Land for 14 years never lost a Battle to them with a single army and without any reinforcements from Carthage other than The galic tribes nor supplies from his country living of the land , he won major victories against them , Even once they encircled him in a valley he marched through the darkness of night while making them chase Fire attached to horns of cattle and then later Ambushed the Roman detachment sent to ambush him , He ambushed a whole roman army at trasimane which till this day remains the biggest and most successful ambush in the history of warfare , He won an unbelievable Victory at cannea outnumbered till the last moments of the battle , Fighting in the front with his men with one eye which resulted in the greatest Loss of humane life in a single day through the history of battles and warfare , He is the General that is more intimidating and Greater then even some kings Napoleon really considered him one of the best tacticians and he truly was , he made the rommans live in fear for 14 years , he didn't need the Great of The Conqueror added to his name , His name was enough to make anyone have chills Hannibal Barca , He was Basically fighting Rome AloneAnd he made them take The L For 14 years and on their own land never has a general Humiliated rome more,If the garbage Carthaginian Senate Supported Him With The Fresh Troops and Supplies and seige engines He requested After His victory at Cannea there would be no Rome
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 yeah well he still lost
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 who won
HANNIBAL❤🇹🇳
W hannibal as always
Hannibal was the Thanos of Rome.
Scipio africanus 🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁
Scipio africanus Thanos of Carthage
@@god6326 who remembers scipio?
@@ozgurpeynirci4586 everybody in latin countries?
Did I seriously just watch a thirst trap of a guy from 2200 years ago?
Yup
He fight alone. And dead alone
The man that almost saved the world and its cultures from the Romans.
And even though I am Greek, I admire him even more than Alexander the Great.
He didn't save the cultures from Rome
But he was a great enemy. Respect the man for his deeds
😂😂😂
Roman culture was a blessing for the world.
@@mason-masonsminecraftmason2756 "Blessing" we call it when it dose NOT: force itself on everyone around them (and killing the rest.), replace other cultures with their own, change its own religion influenced by Christian cultists, end up causing countless deaths in the name of their "one true god" and give birth to many smaller racist colonialist nations that end up first enslaving even more cultures and civilizations, then do a 180 and act all "humane" just because they are a democracy and remain dominant today to force their agendas on the rest of the world.
Rome is literally the root of all the problems we face today.
saved the world? Bruh what
Tunisia 🇹🇳💪💪💪
Military minds can’t understand why he didn’t destroy Rome, but that just wasn’t his style.
It's because he didn't have all the equipment he needed
He didn't have enough men and resources to do it... And like it or not even he knew about the Roman determination... It's not like they will surrender or anything they will fight till the last man
Because he couldn't, even if he wanted to. Next question?
carthage say ; no
@@buzzkill36 Well, it was a goofy decision from Hannibal not to march on Rome after the victory at Trasimene. A goofy decision that, after the war, Hannibal himself admitted was a missed opportunity. There are two reasons that historians suggest might have been the reason that Hannibal didn't destroy Rome after Trasimene:
1) "He couldn't have because of his lack of resources, men, supplies, etc." - but that was long disproven because, near Rome, there wandered a Roman navy of 30 ships. Formidable, right? Carthage had a fleet of 70 ships nearby. Hannibal could have done a sea-land operation, one with his main army, and one with Carthage's fleet, to destroy Rome. Additionally, he did have enough men. The most Rome could recruit to defend the then small city was about 10k men. About 2 legions of men. That would not have been enough for the approximate 45k army of the Carthaginians. Hannibal could've breached Rome and wiped it off of the face of the Earth - he simple could have. Rome was in a crisis, and its legions were all too far away to help. In total, Rome had 6-8 active legions across the Western Mediterranean. Only 2 could arrive immediately in time before Hannibal could have arrived.
2) "He was influenced by Greek Hellenistic thinking" - the more likely reasoning. In Hellenistic thinking, it was the idea that, in war, you should beat your opponent in battle over and over again so that they fairly surrendered, not being able to fight anymore. It is likely that Hannibal believed this rather than razing Rome, even though that is what he initially wanted before starting the war.
3) My theory: His focus diverged - as great as Hannibal was, I think his focus diverged onto the next nice looking thing, which is going down to Southern Italy and getting more plunder and supplies and allies. Like instant gratification. Whereas Rome was focused throughout the entire war. They knew what they wanted - remove Carthage out of Iberia and take it for themselves, maintain Corsica, Sardinia and Italy and protect the eternal city.
The alchemy needed to bring elephants is crazzzzy. What a beast.
He could have taken Rome if he had siege towers, he sadly, did not
He. probably Could Have Taken Rome, Gaul,Greece,And All Mediterranean lands If he was Supported by The Garbage Carthaginian senate or was The Emperor of Carthage Himself
Respect Hannibal from a Hellene, he really was our toughest enemy...🫡
Rest in peace hannibaal barca🙏
Just saying his name put fear in everyone Great Hannibal Barcaa Pride to be part of that
Esse Aníbal é inexplicável. Realmente difícil de explicar como conseguiu tantos feitos com tão pouco.
Gangster till Scipio Africanus shows up
Fr
Well scipio did meet Hannibal at cannae
the Things Hannibal Done and achieved Scipio Could Only Dream Off, when Scipio Defeated Hannibal at zama Hannibal's army was poorly trained and consisted of many elderly and inexperienced troops while Scipio lead the best army rome had to offer then his legionars served under him for long and were experienced and fir fighting machines, and Hannibal was also Betrayed by His Numidian Cavalry and their leader that's the main reason he lost not due to any leadership skills from Scipio or because Scipio was a better general and a tactician than Hannibal, Hannibal>>> Scipio' That isn't an opinion that's a fact
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 Pffft, yeah right Rome still lasted for 2000 years and C*rthage never left any legacy. Scipio was also never defeated and even campaigned in the east as well. And lets not forget, time to bring the salt, boys!
CARTHAGO DELENDA EST! HAHA!
@@RaidenTheRipper950 please shat f up we dont forget 70k of soliders are diéd in war canne but hannibal have 20k soliders
The Most powerful enemy of the most powerful empire
Hannibal barca's last name barca means 'thunderbolt' in punic language and he destroyed roman forces like a thunderbolt.
@yousifboti yeah sorry I forgot when I was writing that, thanks for correcting me
Barca is like (Barak) in Hebrew and (Barq) in Arabic, because the surname Barqa is Phoenician in origin and all of these languages are Semitic.
The scourge of Rome.
Romes greatest enemy
Rome's greatest enemy.
how did you do that 3D zoom sweep effect?
No Idea Man The Whole Edit Was made by my friend Ya4ze but sadly his tiktok account was banned for no reason, luckily i had saved this edit on my phone, Just search for the effect on YT Im pretty sure you will find out how it's done
Scipio africanus joins the chat
Hannibal Barca> Scipio
The Things Hannibal Done Scipio Can Only Dream Off
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 you are biased
@@god6326he is kinda right...Scipio was a genius himself...One of the best ever but still Hannibal has the edge...What he did at cannae was IMPOSSIBLE
Undefeated commander undefeated ruler in the world every time khalid bin walidh raliallahuanhu
I know im a Muslim Khalid Ibn Al Walid is the best general ever but he was never a ruler brother he was a commander, it was Abu Bakr and Omar who ruled Over him
Khaled ibn al walod killed a muslim to steal and marry his wife on the same day and the "fair"caliphs did nothing about him
No one is like ali ibn abi taleb the opener of khaybar and his son abbas and hussain
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 Napoleon is the best general ever...And Alexander has been undefeated
BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED
Shame he didn't knew to use the victories
Ig rome just had plot armor
They didn't have plot armour...Romans just NEVER accepted defeat...They were as gritty as one can possibly be...Hannibal defeated them everytime BUT ONE and that turned out to be the defeat of Carthage...Even after Cannae Romans didn't even consider surrender they started preparing for a siege....Carthage could never have defeated Rome
@@buzzkill36 Romans were the USSR of that time. USSR recruited 15% of its entire massive 250+ million people population in WW2. Rome pretty much did the same, except the relative percentage was larger. They just spammed the recruit button over and over again.
It is true, though, the Romans never gave up. It is honestly very impressive to see such determination.
The Napoleon of 200 bc
ONE FAMILY. ONE CARTHAGINIAN FAMILY MOGGED ROME FOR DECADES. JUST ONE OUT OF MANY. REMEMBER THAT.
Proving your genetic superiority by crossing the alps:
He died in isolation,he did the campaign for Carthage only to be stabbed in the back by the senate
Yeah Sadly Carthage Was Given a General of Great Caliber He could've expanded their empire many times over if only they supported him and were focused on military matters more than trade, Imagine if Hannibal wasn't just a general if he was the emperor or king of Carthage he would Litterally conquer Rome and add it to his empire and then expand even more creating a strong Barcid Dynasty that would rule for decades or centuries, his story is really sad he had so much potential it was his country that let him down
He also lost his brothers during the war.Hamilcar Barca (Hannibal’s dad)felt betrayed by the weak politicians when they surrendered
Carthage had a menace but they stabbed him,if they gave him the reinforcements there would’ve been no Rome and no Roman Empire
Hannibal and scipio were different from eachother one thing they had in common was that they were both betrayed by their country
Hannibal ante portas
Smoked his pack in rome 2
Khaled bin Al-Walid is the best war leader of all time, before and after history
Yup I Agree
BIG NOPE
fraud only fought already destroyed persian and washed up buzentine empire
He's greatly exaggerated. There's so many generals who could whoop khalids as
Khaled was a sadic infidel who destroyed muslims in uhud battle and murdered malek ibn nusayr imam ali gave that infidel a good lesson
القائد الأعلى حنبعل قاهر روما
Scipio africanus 🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁
@@god6326 no one cares about scipio
@@ozgurpeynirci4586 Yes they do...He eventually defeated Hannibal
@@buzzkill36 basically no one remembers him as much about as Hannibal who is still loved and talked about for his bravery and brilliance.
Scipio Africanus: i'll end his career right here right now
Roma Delenda Est
who you think is better carthage or the almohades
The Almohads defeated a 300,000 strong army so i would give it to them.
@@Holybatman3603 Carthage definitely. Almohads were just another faction within Islamic civilization while Carthage was Phoenician civilization in its totality.
@@Holybatman3603raël
@@user-rv6cx3rz7tPunic civilization*
Carthage by far...If not for Rome they would have controlled all of the Mediterranean
I will name my son hannibal and khalid and Alexander just for the love of fighting and conquering
MaschAllah
Will your people really accept Alexander name?
@@SigmaSankalp iskander the arabic version
@@SigmaSankalpWho cares...Warriors of any religion or community must be respected
Scipio africanus 🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁
L Hannibal
W Scipio
Whatever you say
Scipio grew up studying Hannibal's tactics. It took 16 years of campaigning for him to learn how to defeat Hannibal.
And what was amiss in Hannibal's warfare waging? The fact that Carthage didn't buckle down Numidia and Spain properly, making these two states quickly switch to Rome's side.
Roma delenda est
Roma is still Italy’s capital and has a population of 2.7 million, it is anything but deleted.
Carthago delenda est
🤡
@@wrednax8594 L+Ratio+No War Elephants+Salted Lands+Bozo+Fell off Sicily
During Second Punic War Hannibal Barca>> Rome
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108 cope
My god Cato is back!
Half Cartiginian half Iberian
He wasn't Iberian, Imilce was his concubine, not his mother.
@@Holybatman3603 he was a levantine middle eastern anyways , which is close to jewish and assyrian
@@ozgurpeynirci4586 He was North African, all genetic tests proved the North African origins of the Carthaginians.
He was a north African nothing more
@@Holybatman3603 do you realize hannibal is from an aristocratic family and not a regular carthaginian passing by the street. Carthaginians (which called themselves Kananim-Phoenician) were extremely racist and would not approve marriages with foreigners. Especially noble class were known to marry inside the ethnicity. So he is a middle eastern person while his people were half north african.
The great fraud
POV: You Don't Know History
Carthago Delenda Est
Average Dovan Havtty fanboy
He lost
I know tell me something i don't
But he lives.
Rome fanboy
I am Algerian and I prefer Alexander the Great over Hannibal Barca because the difference is as clear as the sun is better
Yeah Alexander overall was better but you gotta agree...Hannibal was a better tactician
Im Also Algerian and Yeah Alexander Is Better But you Have To Understand Alexander Had Ultimate Power and authority And was King Of Greece And Directed All Of Greece's Ressources and warmachine Against The Persian Empire and he was Fighting With the Best Drilled and Experienced Army In the World at that time and His Army was Mostly All Greeks So Spoke Same language had same fighting styles and Tactics and therefore easier to Command, On The Other Hand Hannibal Barca Didn't Have The Same Power and Control Over Carthage's Ressources and Might Wether On Political or Military level and Had to Cope With Garbage Wealthy Beraucratic leaders Who Had Put their Own Interests First Over The inrests of Carthage It's Army and Most importantly it's Army ,Many of them were Corrupt as well and they were The Main Reason Carthage Lost The Second punic war ,And You Also Have To Remember That Hannibal Was fighting With a mixed ethnicity army of thousands of men from different Regions with different Languages and Fighting Styles ,he Had Spanish,Gauls, Carthaginians,Numidians and he still somehow maintained them as an effective fighting force without any records of a rebilion or anything like it And Was Fighting the Best Trained and Drilled Force Of his Time and he managed To Keep threatening Rome's very existence with a single army on their own land for 15 years after Humiliating the Romans and killing or capturing+170k of their total male population he was Also Way batter At Ambushes than alexander,Had Hannibal Had the Power and Authority That Alexander Had He would Have done Many More Greater Things For Carthage and For his legacy
@@cheriefsadeksadek2108Hannibal Barca is the greatest general in history
Hard to say whose better. Alexander was crowned king with all resources.
But its hard to say who is better as a military general. Both are impressive.
Hannibal Barca IS BLACK 🖤 Happy BLACK 🖤 Month Blessings and Hugs 💖💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕!
He wasn't black and instead of trying to make other characters black, try to actually find actual historical black characters
@@InAeternumRomaMater He WAS historical BLACK 🖤 character and He's real!
@@markherron1407 No he wasn't lmao, stop creating black characters just because you want to. Hannibal was Phoenician which makes him middle Eastern. Not all North Africans are black because it's Africa but there's Berbers who lives in North Western Africa who are white-light skinned people. Carthage was a phoenician colony and most High ranking people like Hannibal were middle eastern looking.
Shut up Hannibal is White! Hannibal is Tunisian and Tunisian are White🇹🇳✊🏼
@@markherron1407 saying he's black is like saying your kind contributed to mankind
Both are false
He lost lmao 😂
Scipio better
Because he learned from Hannibal.
@@makutas-v261 na, Scipio just better
@@GamingKnight0820 based
@@trusttn 110% based
@@GamingKnight0820
He was defeated 3 times in 3 armies facing hannibal
Hannibal barca was a black men...
no he wasn't?
he was African, but not black
the upper classes of Carthage were Phoenicians, and so was Hannibal
he had the same skin colour as a current day man in Jordan
@@obscurekidney501 there is no proof to say he is Jordanian .but there is proof to claim is black because archeologists have discovered a coin with face of Hannibal and the elephant he road (surus) in north Italy trasimin.
@@aberhittesfamaryam3799 he was not black, he was phoenician
big difference
@@obscurekidney501 how do you know he is Phoenician??? He was born in Africa....
@@obscurekidney501 I'm sure as a fan of Hannibal you know carthaginians are very mixed people...
Roma Delenda Est
Carthage does not exist 😂😂😂😂🤣
@@god6326 neither does rome
Rome is the capital of Italy meaning it rules over more land now than it did when Hannibal invaded, so not really delenda est.
Carthago delenda est
*Carthago delenda est
@@InAeternumRomaMater mb og
Thank you sir, I have fixed it
@@InAeternumRomaMater "ROMA DELENDA EST!" - Genserich.