All these dudes never grow up Masterson, Vito, Andy warski, PPP. I came back to this content, literally 10 years later and all these figs are talking about the same shit. Metokur is the best of them... he's still having fun making fun if all of them.
The live call-in between Vito and Eric July occurred back on August 22, 2022. ON THAT DATE, I commented in its comment section about how Eric July was being a COWARD for not allowing Vito (whom I mistakenly believed was PumaFist) to promote his comic. SURPRISINGLY, one of my comment's responders was ERIC JULY. Note at the very end how Eric July says that you, VITO were just "talking shit." Below is the conversation we had: @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago Minute 28: 15 "Don't be that guy because he's coming from a complete point of jealousy. " --That was not my take away from this caller. What is the reason that this comic, that no one has seen, is getting so much promotion? That is the caller's argument. Are the buyers of this comic buying it because there is a perception it is anti-woke therefore you must support this comic? I think Eric's view of his comic is that it is not political (woke vs. anti-woke) but the CZcamsrs promoting it seem to think it is. Why is that? Reply @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago The caller sounds like PumaFist from CZcams. I am watching this video right now and I wonder why this caller has not been identified. Why is it a secret? So far this seems like a phone call in good faith. Eric July months ago took a call from Nerdette's newsstand. There was no secret who he was talking to in that phone call so why is this caller not named? Reply YoungRippa59 · 4 replies @joshjohnson6891 @joshjohnson6891 1 year ago I can understand Eric not wanting to give him clout or send his listeners over to the guy. It's like free promotion for the guy he's talking to. He muted the guy from plugging his own comic book so makes sense that Eric doesn't even want to give his name out either. Reply @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago @joshjohnson6891 Eric let everyone know he was having an interview many months ago with Nerdette's newsstand. From that interview, it was apparent that he did not agree with Nerdette. It seems unfair that Nerdette was allowed to plug her CZcams page and yet PumaFist is not allowed to promote his CZcams page. Sure, its Eric's channel so he doesn't have to let anyone know who he was talking to here but it seems cowardly. I am listening to this video right now and he still has not identified the caller's name. Reply @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago Let me correct my error. PumaFist says it is not him. Regardless, the caller made some good points. Reply @youngrippa59 @youngrippa59 1 year ago @sonic31century1 What were the good points? Reply @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago @youngrippa59 Here are just three of the good points this unnamed caller made: Minute 1: 36 Caller listens to your correction about what a parallel economy is and he responds, "Your basically saying getting away from the kind of mainstream grift that we've had for so long where there have been gatekeepers in media who determine what T.V. shows get made what comic books get published. You just kind of want to move into a space where those gatekeepers either don't exist or there is you know it's basically more independently created media is what I'm hearing." Minute 2: 24 Caller gives his impression of your success, "I think my main criticisms of you have been that a lot of the excitement that I see about your project is not necessarily based on storyline or characters but merely that you exist as a kind of antidote to Marvel or DC or whatever people think the mainstream are doing. " Minute 4: 30 Caller talks about how other CZcamsrs respond to the reason for your success, "Well a lot of my criticism as been that, and it's not necessarily aimed at you but kind of people around you. Some of these commentators who go 'Well this is a big wake-up call for Marvel and DC .' I disagree because I look at Marvel and DC and I go 'Well, what could they do-start hiring CZcamsrs and influencers to make comic books? ' I don't think that is a viable business strategy for them. But I think you would say 'No, the wake-up call is that it is not political, right and that is what people want?' " Reply @youngrippa59 @youngrippa59 1 year ago 1. How is that an actual “good point” considering the conversation. 2. Ignorance is not a “good point.” The guy is essentially saying because he’s ignored the enthusiasm, it doesn’t exist. Those are not mutually exclusive concepts anyway. 3. This point contradicts the previous one and is a post shift from criticism of me to then others. Your good points are basically just contrarianism. Reply @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago @youngrippa59 1. It is a good point because the caller says that you specifically are producing a comic without the mainstream comic companies being involved. Although the caller only mentioned you here, my interpretation of this is that it could also be a description of other independent comics creators of just the past four years as well. For example: Richard C Meyer and Ethan Van Sciver. 2. This is also a good point made by the caller. I interpret this point to mean that the caller has been watching other CZcams channels who have been promoting you without them presumably having even seen the comic. These other CZcams channels do not talk about your characters; these other CZcams channels talk about your comic as it relates to 'woke' Marvel and DC. I did not find this comment by the caller to be ignorant. 3. This is also a good point in its criticism of other CZcamsrs. My interpretation of this is that these other CZcamsrs are using your comic which presumably they have never seen to criticize Marvel and DC comics that they have read in the past. My interpretation of this call was that it was made by someone who may be some kind of competitor of yours in regards to products you both have produced: T-shirts? Comic books? I don't know for certain because you muted the caller when ever he started talking about himself. From your muting of him, all I could hear was that he was going to be on someone else's podcast at some later time. If you somehow knew he was going to try a promote his product during this call and you did not want him to do that, why did you not just tell him to not talk about his product on your CZcams show? Well maybe I missed it and you did tell him that during the call. Eric July, do you object to my having described these and other comments made by the caller as "good" points? I don't see these points as "bad" points. How about they were "interesting" points? Reply @sonic31century1 @sonic31century1 1 year ago @youngrippa59 How about the following good point the secret caller brought up: After a long back and forth between you and the caller, the caller says he has seen news articles about your comic calling it "anti-woke.' At minute 16: 25 the caller says, "You know you benefit from that perception. " My interpretation of this good point brought up by the caller is that he has an awareness that other people believing your comic is 'anti-woke' or even anti-Marvel or anti-DC, as these comic companies currently exist today, helped the sales of your comic. At minute 16: 34 you agree with this good point made by the caller. You said, "Well, me benefiting from people that think that this is the anti-(woke) or as you mentioned as the anecdote is, that's one thing and that's fine. You know I'm perfectly, if I'm going to benefit from it. Also I'm a capitalist at the end of the day." I interpret this as you being fine with benefiting from the wrong beliefs about your comic that its buyers may have. The call was made in good faith. That is my interpretation of it. You labeled it as a detractor's call. At the least, he was probably a competitor for the same customers you have. Reply @youngrippa59 @youngrippa59 1 year ago @sonic31century1 1. That "point" is completely irrelevant to the crux of the position. That's essentially him bitchin' 2. Me benefitting, again, is a post shift from the crux. No, the call was not made in good faith. He talked shit before, and he talked shit immediately after this dispute. Reply
Eric is the most sensitive black person that I know of.
Okay, so you know a black person
WOW, I had no idea, that is so low, even for him
Please make a comic book and have Eric July publish it and ship it out for you
@@angelaschmalke7836 🤣🤣🤣
@@NerdettesNewsStand dew it
The biggest revenge vito is to have Eric July published and ship out his book
What's funny if he says no because of Vito "being a pedo" thing it goes against what Eric says about the Soska Sisters incest porn.
Only Eric is aloud to censor others for literally the smallest thing ever
Fear not. Eric July going out of business will be worth the wait.
wow I thought he only did it once, but he just kept muting him over and over
And when he clipped it from the Livestream he edited out what he missed. Such a bitch
This truly upset me to see
didnt Vito false flag peoples channels??
What it is is
Ahhh does that make dicky wicky mad? That he don't wanna promote P words comic? Wahhhh don't talk about my co-hosty wosty like that? 😫
Go back to Erics teat. It's getting cold
You sound just as retarded as Eric, guy. It's a shame you can't see how petty and childish the act is.
Had to mention Maddox again too for the billionth time 😂 man is obsessed
All these dudes never grow up Masterson, Vito, Andy warski, PPP. I came back to this content, literally 10 years later and all these figs are talking about the same shit. Metokur is the best of them... he's still having fun making fun if all of them.
Eric advocated monetizing your haters and here he is being so insecure about his guest promoting his stuff 😂
The live call-in between Vito and Eric July occurred back on August 22, 2022. ON THAT DATE, I commented in its comment section about how Eric July was being a COWARD for not allowing Vito (whom I mistakenly believed was PumaFist) to promote his comic. SURPRISINGLY, one of my comment's responders was ERIC JULY. Note at the very end how Eric July says that you, VITO were just "talking shit." Below is the conversation we had:
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
Minute 28: 15 "Don't be that guy because he's coming from a complete point of jealousy. "
--That was not my take away from this caller. What is the reason that this comic, that no one has seen, is getting so much promotion? That is the caller's argument. Are the buyers of this comic buying it because there is a perception it is anti-woke therefore you must support this comic? I think Eric's view of his comic is that it is not political (woke vs. anti-woke) but the CZcamsrs promoting it seem to think it is. Why is that?
Reply
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
The caller sounds like PumaFist from CZcams. I am watching this video right now and I wonder why this caller has not been identified. Why is it a secret? So far this seems like a phone call in good faith. Eric July months ago took a call from Nerdette's newsstand. There was no secret who he was talking to in that phone call so why is this caller not named?
Reply
YoungRippa59
·
4 replies
@joshjohnson6891
@joshjohnson6891
1 year ago
I can understand Eric not wanting to give him clout or send his listeners over to the guy. It's like free promotion for the guy he's talking to. He muted the guy from plugging his own comic book so makes sense that Eric doesn't even want to give his name out either.
Reply
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
@joshjohnson6891 Eric let everyone know he was having an interview many months ago with Nerdette's newsstand. From that interview, it was apparent that he did not agree with Nerdette. It seems unfair that Nerdette was allowed to plug her CZcams page and yet PumaFist is not allowed to promote his CZcams page. Sure, its Eric's channel so he doesn't have to let anyone know who he was talking to here but it seems cowardly. I am listening to this video right now and he still has not identified the caller's name.
Reply
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
Let me correct my error. PumaFist says it is not him. Regardless, the caller made some good points.
Reply
@youngrippa59
@youngrippa59
1 year ago
@sonic31century1 What were the good points?
Reply
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
@youngrippa59 Here are just three of the good points this unnamed caller made:
Minute 1: 36 Caller listens to your correction about what a parallel economy is and he responds, "Your basically saying getting away from the kind of mainstream grift that we've had for so long where there have been gatekeepers in media who determine what T.V. shows get made what comic books get published. You just kind of want to move into a space where those gatekeepers either don't exist or there is you know it's basically more independently created media is what I'm hearing."
Minute 2: 24 Caller gives his impression of your success, "I think my main criticisms of you have been that a lot of the excitement that I see about your project is not necessarily based on storyline or characters but merely that you exist as a kind of antidote to Marvel or DC or whatever people think the mainstream are doing. "
Minute 4: 30 Caller talks about how other CZcamsrs respond to the reason for your success, "Well a lot of my criticism as been that, and it's not necessarily aimed at you but kind of people around you. Some of these commentators who go 'Well this is a big wake-up call for Marvel and DC .' I disagree because I look at Marvel and DC and I go 'Well, what could they do-start hiring CZcamsrs and influencers to make comic books? ' I don't think that is a viable business strategy for them. But I think you would say 'No, the wake-up call is that it is not political, right and that is what people want?' "
Reply
@youngrippa59
@youngrippa59
1 year ago
1. How is that an actual “good point” considering the conversation.
2. Ignorance is not a “good point.” The guy is essentially saying because he’s ignored the enthusiasm, it doesn’t exist. Those are not mutually exclusive concepts anyway.
3. This point contradicts the previous one and is a post shift from criticism of me to then others.
Your good points are basically just contrarianism.
Reply
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
@youngrippa59 1. It is a good point because the caller says that you specifically are producing a comic without the mainstream comic companies being involved. Although the caller only mentioned you here, my interpretation of this is that it could also be a description of other independent comics creators of just the past four years as well. For example: Richard C Meyer and Ethan Van Sciver.
2. This is also a good point made by the caller. I interpret this point to mean that the caller has been watching other CZcams channels who have been promoting you without them presumably having even seen the comic. These other CZcams channels do not talk about your characters; these other CZcams channels talk about your comic as it relates to 'woke' Marvel and DC. I did not find this comment by the caller to be ignorant.
3. This is also a good point in its criticism of other CZcamsrs. My interpretation of this is that these other CZcamsrs are using your comic which presumably they have never seen to criticize Marvel and DC comics that they have read in the past.
My interpretation of this call was that it was made by someone who may be some kind of competitor of yours in regards to products you both have produced: T-shirts? Comic books? I don't know for certain because you muted the caller when ever he started talking about himself. From your muting of him, all I could hear was that he was going to be on someone else's podcast at some later time.
If you somehow knew he was going to try a promote his product during this call and you did not want him to do that, why did you not just tell him to not talk about his product on your CZcams show? Well maybe I missed it and you did tell him that during the call.
Eric July, do you object to my having described these and other comments made by the caller as "good" points? I don't see these points as "bad" points. How about they were "interesting" points?
Reply
@sonic31century1
@sonic31century1
1 year ago
@youngrippa59 How about the following good point the secret caller brought up:
After a long back and forth between you and the caller, the caller says he has seen news articles about your comic calling it "anti-woke.' At minute 16: 25 the caller says, "You know you benefit from that perception. " My interpretation of this good point brought up by the caller is that he has an awareness that other people believing your comic is 'anti-woke' or even anti-Marvel or anti-DC, as these comic companies currently exist today, helped the sales of your comic.
At minute 16: 34 you agree with this good point made by the caller. You said, "Well, me benefiting from people that think that this is the anti-(woke) or as you mentioned as the anecdote is, that's one thing and that's fine. You know I'm perfectly, if I'm going to benefit from it. Also I'm a capitalist at the end of the day." I interpret this as you being fine with benefiting from the wrong beliefs about your comic that its buyers may have.
The call was made in good faith. That is my interpretation of it. You labeled it as a detractor's call. At the least, he was probably a competitor for the same customers you have.
Reply
@youngrippa59
@youngrippa59
1 year ago
@sonic31century1 1. That "point" is completely irrelevant to the crux of the position. That's essentially him bitchin'
2. Me benefitting, again, is a post shift from the crux.
No, the call was not made in good faith. He talked shit before, and he talked shit immediately after this dispute.
Reply
Cheers for posting the thread - I'm nobody but just dropping a comment so you know it was read (and enjoyed 😂)