6 Months With The Fuji GFX System - A Film Shooter's Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 06. 2024
- Head to squarespace.com/kylemcdougall to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code: KYLEMCDOUGALL
Pre-order my new book ‘An American Mile’: bit.ly/3Og6Z45
After roughly six months of shooting with both the GFX50R and GFX100S, I wanted to put together this review to share my thoughts about this digital system, as someone who has worked primarily with film for the past five years. I cover things like image quality compared to film, the medium format sensor and if it has a ‘look’, and if I’d consider switching to the GFX completely.
Intro: 00:00
Why the GFX?: 00:48
Medium Format Sensor Benefits: 02:13
Lenses: 03:57
Sponsor Message: 04:54
Lenses Continued: 05:45
Image Quality: 8:45
GFX Image Compared To Film: 10:56
Dislikes: 12:15
Final Thoughts: 13:27
►Follow me on Instagram: / kyle__mcdougall
►Order my new book ‘An American Mile’: bit.ly/3Og6Z45
►*DISCLAIMER*
Some of the links below are affiliate links, where I earn a small commission if you click on the link and purchase an item. The money I earn helps me make this type of content consistently.
►GEAR USED IN THIS VIDEO(*these are affiliate links):
Fuji GFX 50R: ebay.us/aZpMIP
Fuji GFX 100S: ebay.us/w8vvx8
Fuji GF 50mm 3.5: ebay.us/xXqvqJ
Fuji GF 35-70mm: ebay.us/xZy5yz
Fuji GF 32-64mm: ebay.us/JZ7fIr
Mitakon 65mm f1.4: ebay.us/yfu9NG
Pentax 645 A 45mm f2.8: ebay.us/S4lG09
Pentax 645 A 75mm f2.8: ebay.us/FErmOP
Contax Zeiss CY 45mm f2.8: ebay.us/h0agM2
Kipon P645 to GFX Adapter: ebay.us/jearrc
Kipon EF to GFX Adapter: ebay.us/OBdZsp
My '35mm Film Photography Course' on Skillshare (FREE with this link): skl.sh/2JrGhFs
My 'Medium Format Film Photography Course' on Skillshare (FREE with this link): skl.sh/3r7KLta
Where I source music for my videos (One FREE month with this link): fm.pxf.io/c/1953156/1347628/1...
Videos on this channel are filmed using the Fuji X-H2s: bhpho.to/3UEjFVs
►FILM PHOTOGRAPHY GEAR (*these are affiliate links):
My go-to medium format camera: ebay.us/GaK9Kp
My favourite 35mm film camera: ebay.us/82WyVI
My favourite 35mm film lens: ebay.us/u0V817
My favourite medium format travel camera: ebay.us/FVcfWk
My go-to light meter: ebay.us/QIFXF0
My favourite film stock: ebay.us/orbudp
My favourite 645 medium format film camera: ebay.us/ydY4HK
→Instagram: bit.ly/2GuYV21
→Website: kmcdougall.com
First time I have ever added a comment to a You Tube video. As a full time professional photographer for over 40 years I have been through the film to digital transition. To this day I still struggle with the working daily with digital and working with film for my personal work. This video presents such a well balanced, personal argument as to the pros and cons of each form of capture. Well done.. you have put it all in a perspective that sees you apart from fan boys of either side.
I appreciate the comment, Ashley! Glad you enjoyed this one.
@Phillip Banes I love the look and the mechanics of film. I keep going back to it for my personal work but for every gem I get a lot of disappointing images.
@Phillip Banes I think you are about 90 percent right.
@Phillip Banes Actual chemistry and physical changes on film.
It's so raw to me, compared to digital.
Digital, you can easily manipulate everything, especially nowadays. Film does feel just right for me, and way more emotional, from the whole picture creating process. Film is real. With digital....uhum, can your fave RAW converter into the next 10+ years still recognize your used RAW format? A film camera which works, can even being used into decades from now....a high end DSLR, DSLM nowadays...into 5-10+ years from now, goes from uber expensive to just "meh" into value...down. Since technology advances that fast. Or take phones...all 3-6 months new models....gosh.
Professional studio photographer here -- Fuji is absolutely killing it with their digital medium format cameras. They've been slowly making their way into mainstream workflows and it makes me so happy. I remember being so excited to using the 100s on set. It's a beast. I'm about to switch over to the 50R this tax season for the same reasons you talked about. Great video!
Thanks for watching, Mike!
That, my dude, was a GREAT review. A photographer talking about the essential experience of shooting with the machines. Yes! Pixel Peeping is not photography, it may be the photo part, the graphy, the writing, the poetry, that’s something else entirely. And the caliber of your work speaks volumes to your appreciation of that magic dance that is the coalescing of human and machine to make art. Bravo. Your work and words are inspiring.
Really appreciate that. Thank you.
A buddy of mine just let me borrow his GFX50R and I’ve absolutely loved it. He offered a crazy deal and I’ve been on the fence trying to decide how I can work it into my workflow, and this video really solidified it. I’ve got the same Pentax lenses as well as the native Fuji 50 3.5. I think I’ll be happy with that combination to slow my film use a bit
Cheers, Zach. I'm sure you'll be happy with it!
The images in this video are absolutely OUTSTANDING!!!
Every good tool has its uses. I think we live in a time where we have more choices than ever before (it might not last), so everyone can find what suits him/her best. For some types of photography film is still the way to go (or even the only option, like with 4x5 pinhole), for other types digital is totally fine (no matter the sensor size). Shooting film can be damn expensive, so there have to be good reasons to do it (like having fun, a valid reason in my book). A very good video, and very relatable.
This was an awesome and inspiring video for me to see at this stage of my "therapy hobby!" I love the simplicity of your pictures and what you're producing. Definitely a film frame of mind with a digital camera. Thanks Kyle
Thank you, Kevin! Glad you enjoyed this one.
You have a very laconic and soulful feel in your work and, the look of your images evokes film regardless of whether it is or not. I end up making filmic images too because that is the tradition of my becoming a photographer. The aesthetic has moved on to fit what digital cameras bring to the medium and yet strangely, the subtleties of film are becoming better understood by photographers who have only ever learnt their craft in digital photography. I may need to bend my path towards Fujifilm’s medium format to see what I can do with it… you’ve made me think a lot more about what’s possible.
Thanks for that, Christopher. I do think that regardless of digital or film, the final look of an image will mostly be guided by the photographer's eye and processing decisions. I started my journey in school for film, then worked professionally with digital for many years, and then to film again for my personal work about five years ago. I like to think that I've taken little bits from it all.
I'm so glad we live in a time where both film and digital are still available, and an option for those who want it.
I picked up a used GFX50R earlier this year and I totally fell in love. It's by far my favorite camera I've ever used.
Great review and a very honest take on the film vs digital debate. I shoot medium format on a Pentax 645 and Fuji G617 but honestly I could totally go to a GFX 50/100. The images it produces are truly beautiful even if you don't like digital. Shooting a high MP digital body is not as easy as you'd think. It reveals so much detail.
Thanks as always for a thoughtful video. Have been following for awhile as part of my new journey into film…shooting 35mm with a Pentax MX and almost went 645 and almost 6x7…maybe when I’m ready. Appreciate how you are embracing both digital and film formats as I am finding each does have its own merits and advantages. Thanks Kyle..love the photos and the videos. Cheers !
Cheers, David!
I've had my Hasselblad H1 for a little while now and have shot many rolls of film through it. I recently had the opportunity to acquire a near full frame CCD Phase One P25+ back for my Hasselblad for a fraction of the original cost. My experience shooting digital has been fantastic. Being able to shoot both film and digital on the same camera body is great and the files from old "fat pixel CCD backs" are fantastic. As long as you understand and can work with CCD's limitations you can get stellar results.
That's been a tempting route that I've researched at times. I'm also interested in those old CCD backs.
@@KyleMcDougall give it a try Kyle. I'm in a similar place, since I'm starting my film journey (from well, not too many months ago, but always loved film), and also I've been using those CCD backs for a decade. I'll just say this: since I understand the qualities you're after, you'll love CCD backs. Personally, I couldn't care less for those 44x33 CMOS MF cameras (all of them without exception), because being CMOS they're essentially like any other "FF" Canon, Nikon, Sony. But once you try those CCD backs, you immediately see something else. I have the P25, as well as a 31mp Hassy back. If I were to recommend, take a look at the P45+. It's a Kodak sensor, with INSANE Kodak colors, and fat pixels being a 49x37 mm back. That one or the P65+ are rapidly getting cheaper. The P65+ is a FF 645 sensor, and starting to become quite affordable. Give it a try.
Thanks for that. I can remember i switched to 'digital' way back in 2005 and had exactly that issue in the 'editing' phase, where It just got a bit boring after a while. I'm just starting to teach compact film photography to highschool kids, and its great because you can see where the mistakes are to be corrected, but more importantly, explain them.
GFX system is awesome. For me, it's not a film replacement (I still happily shoot with old medium format film gears). It's a replacement for full frame :D
Excellent commentary! Thanks! I am a former film shooter (though I migrated to digital years ago for the convenience and ease of fill manipulation) who has been seriously considering a GFX for a couple of years now. Have shot with a 100s a couple of times and have been mightily impressed.
Man!! Thank you for your tremendous effort on this!!! I loved it
I love film! The entire process from film section to developing, that's how I started 35 years ago. I like digital but since I make images for personal use I use film more. I do the occasional job but I go at my own pace when it's personal and I love that.
You pretty much summed up my feelings / thoughts about film vs digital. For me, digital sometimes has too much room to play with whereas film has the look it has and you kinda have to go with that. This, for me, is often a positive side of film (pun not intended) photography - I don't lose myself in a sea of endless possibilities for editing. I still shoot both (most often based on what I happen to have laying around).
WOW. Just incredible Volor Harmonies in your images... LOVE LOVE LOVE your work !
🙏 Thank you.
I've been shooting film for almost 40 years. recently just sold my Hasselblad and twin lens Rollei, because of the GFX 100s. Getting awesome scans from film was always a problem for me and after seeing 102 megapixels with these great lenses, I finally let go of film. it is still in my heart, that feeling of the process and I can carry it in the shooting of digital but not having to pay for the film and processing and scanning makes me giggle. The GFX 100s costs the same as my Rollei !
another thing about film is the low number of frames you come back with. it’s similar to the look being dialled in…with digital you come back with 100s of frames to sort through, some of which can be very similar. i love having that for many scenarios but there’s something refreshing about only having a few frames to pick from
double edged sword too, sometimes you take some shots but can't see them until you finish the roll, but that takes a while or you blast through film. sometimes you just wanna see the photos. both mediums are fun and creative in their own way.
I can go out with my GFX for an afternoon and still only shoot 4 frames. 20 years of MF film has made me try and edit before pushing the shutter. I get overwhelmed if I have more than 10 frames to edit or work on in a session.
Film forces you to be selective and to slow down. I already know how my images will turn out through years of trial and error but it's the subject matter and the right composition at least for my eye.
If you are feeling overwhelmed that means there's a problem with your workflow. For example the OM software stacks the bursts for easy review and A to B. It's very very quick to sort through and rank your favorites.
Really cool video! I think what Fuji has done with digital medium format has been truly astounding. I also really appreciate your stance on film v. video. It’s what is behind the camera that really matters!!
Cheers, Nickolas!
Beautiful photos! I love your style of shooting. Thank you for your opinions and information.
Thank you. 🙏
What a great video !!
Thanks a lot for all these inside information !!
love the honest insights and the images, thanks so much
Your video helped me finally make a decision to jump into Fuji’s GFX system, thank you for creating an informative video.
Great to hear!
That's some very thorough thoughts you gave here, thanks for sharing them!
As someone who also comes film to Fujifilm digital, I really hope you could share some of process or standard routines of how you edit your digital raws to achieve similar film look!
Very good video, nonsense free and on point. I used to have 645 and 6x7 Mamiyas + Horseman and Sinar large format cameras + bunch of lenses both medium and large format + complete dark room setup. Sold it ALL to buy GFX 50R + some lenses and I couldn't be happier! I would have never thought something like this could happen to me. I shot film all my life and truly despised digital. With kids and family there just was no time, no place and money to handle the film process anymore. Go ahead film lovers, give GFX a go!!!
Thank you, Lubomir. 🙏
Very balanced and poetic way to share your feelings with no fight between each other solution. Only nice and soft informations. Thank you.
Thank you!
Thanks for the well thought out video. So much great info. here. Yeah, I used to lug that Pentax 6X7 around, and was always a film person, but one day a few years ago I thought damn, here it is 2020, rockets are coming back from space and landing on platforms, and I'm still dealing with dust on my film! Not to mention, I felt guilty as hell as I dumped chemicals down the drain and watched beautiful clear drinking water being wasted down the drain during the rinse process ( I live in California ). So, I made the switch to the Fujifilm 50s and have never looked back. As you say, it all ends up in a digital form anyway, and as one of the commenters said, stay away from presets and you are so good to go. I print on matte hahnemule rag paper on a canon 2100, the results are truly outstanding. Like any art, there are subtle ways to create something unique and beautiful, and for me, digital at this level does it. I used to be a purist as far as process, as I've gotten older, I don't have much of an interest in the process, it either looks good to me or it doesn't. Shoot with a hassy or a iphone, if the outcome is amazing, it's amazing.
Awesome video. Love your 'to the point' delivery. Great vibe throughout. Thanks.
I appreciate that!
Great video and very informative. I am picking up a used GXF R today to try out before I purchase.
I have tried it all, nothing does it like RZ+Nikon 9000ed and Ektar for me. I have printed 60inches directly without any ps editing from scans and got natural, warm, grainy but sharp works for exhibition purposes. Digital files...so clean, still clinical even when emulating film looks. Good for fashion, editorial, commercial work when client needs hi-res and 1500 images from a shoot. I believe that if anyone tries medium to large format with proper scanning, you will never forget the results and that will hunt you haha
Sold my Mamiya 7 w/65mm and 150mm to buy a Fuji 50R with the 63mm. Used it for awhile. Took it to Japan on a long trip. It's a fine camera but didn't like all the futzing I had to do to essentially get what I was getting with the Mamiya. Sold the 50R, re-bought a Mamiya 7 II and and the 80mm (which are much more expensive now) and couldn't be happier. The Fuji's are nice cameras but all in all I much prefer shooting Portra to trying to get the "portra look" from the Fuji. I really like getting a batch of film scans from the lab and doing some quick adjustments in Lightroom and being done. 90% of the time I'm happy with the scans as is. Also never have to think about if a battery is charged. I've had the same battery in the Mamiya for several years and have a spare in the bag that I might need someday.
@Phillip Banes Of course not. What I'm saying is that I'm much more satisfied with my scans than from what comes out of the camera with the 50R so fewer are adjustments are necessary. For me both the shooting and editing process are just more satisfying with film. An expensive but valuable lesson for me. Your mileage may vary.
@Phillip Banes And yet it still won't look how I want it to look. There are two components here, the pleasure of the process and the end product. In both instances for me (and it would seem if you read between the lines of the video for Kyle as well) film works better. Your experience may be differnt in one or both aspects. But no amount of arguing will convince me that this is the correct solution for me. I've done the comparison, made the investment and put in the time with the 50R and I prefer the Mamiya 7 and film in general.
My only point in making these comments is to save others who may be on the fence the time and expense of repeating the process. If you prefer the 50R (or another similar camera) please enjoy it I'm not trying to convince you otherwise.
I’m glad I didn’t sell mine. I’ve been getting a little depressed with the rise of film prices. Being new to film and discovering all the film stocks and trying SLRs, Rangefinders, etc I’ve really fallen in love with film and the process of it. Although, with some people able to afford film daily and shoot it seemingly non stop I’ve felt like shooting digital has been almost shamed upon at least to me. Mostly by those on a specific platform whether it be IG, twitter, and grainery. I know I shouldn’t let others determine my choices or what I shoot, but I am damn jealous of those that have their film collection started. Great video and I’ll make sure I am more grateful for what I have moving forward. Have a great day ❤
I see a future of bulkloaded HP5 and Rodinal 1+100 🔮 Embrace it.
Shoot with what you enjoy. Some days I pick up the film camera, some days the digital. Don't let anyone dictate what makes you happy. They're all just pictures after all.
"You do you, Booboo." - Aba & Preach
shot with what works for you, the end result is the important part. your expression through the medium of photography, you want it expressed on film or in digital with any look you want then that's the right way for you. personally my main camera for shooting now is a grIII, something i never expected to like but ended up loving. it's always in my pocket whenever i go out and the results are great. and for special occasions i use film. find your balance
Embrace what works best for you, and what you enjoy the most. The format that you choose to shoot with will factor very little into the final success of your images. Use what you enjoy, what you can afford, and what meets your needs (both technical and creative).
Great video!
Love my gfx, love shooting film. Have had very similar experiences.
Always look forward to your videos
Cheers, Bryan.
Just listened to your podcast with Fujilove! Great interview Kyle!! I love FUJI cams!
Thanks, Sarah!
thank you so much for this kind review
I love Fujifilms controls and status window. Their XT was the only mirrorless I ever considered. It felt just like my Nikon Fm3a as far as how nice the dials clicked over. Fujifilm is really tempting me.
The best system for film photographers. So happy with my 50S and GFX 100. Never tried 50R and 100s though. GFX 100 is a big step forward compared to GFX 50S and 50R. Fuji is the continuation for film photographers on RB67/Pentax 67 to shoot for "free".
Great stuff as always Kyle! Cheers, Tim
Thank you, Tim!
I think I was on the same trip. Trying to replicate film with my Xpro2, and it looked great, but it largely in my head i was comparing too much and you'd end up mad becz it wasn't film enough. So, what I've been seeing folks do is their own treatment. Shoot from RAW and do the work to make the magic. Presents can often feel like a cop out and leave you wanting more
Really interesting Kyle thank you. Good to see a balanced, non-emotive film/digital video! Sound conclusions. I shoot mostly digital now due to the cost of film but when I want to shoot film, much like you, nothing else will do (and that’s only 35mm). I too went round the houses on presets etc and came to a ‘radical’😮 conclusion… Because I don’t need to mix film and digital in the same body of work, a consistent look isn’t important to me. So I forego any and all presets now and accept, and enjoy, that my digital photographs look digital. They have a unique colour palette that I really like so I play to their strengths. Madness, I know. Anyway, thanks again and all the best.
A very well balanced review. Excellent camera. We like what we like and for me film will always be King.
What you did at 12:46 is pretty neat!
I had the leica summicron 50mm version 5 on the gfx50r and I couldn't believe the details I was getting with this. Ofc you don't get the whole 50MP with a full frame lens but I really loved everything on this combo with the 35mm mode.
It's an interesting case. I've been banging on a drum for years that we need a affordable full frame 645 camera to use some exotic portrait lenses not available for 35 format cameras. I used to complain that the GFX/H1D with their 44x33mm sensors don't give a big enough sensor to utilize some of the "real" medium format lenses in their full potential, but on the other hand it opened another world of utilizing 35 format lenses above their planned potential. Lenses like Contax Planar 50/1.4 shine even more than ever. The GFX is an exotic portrait shooter dream camera nowadays.
The 44x33mm sensor is just not that different enough from 35mm format for me to consider switching to the GFX system.
@@benyyz it all depends on what you shoot. If you do street or landscape or weddings, it's probably not worth it. If you mostly do portraits with oldschool funky bokeh backgrounds, it squeezes the limits of many lenses. Like the Contax Planar 50/1.4 I mentioned "becomes" a 40/1.1, or a Biotar 75/1.5 "becomes" a 58/1.2, which is very tempting to people like me. And there's dozens of lenses from 35 format that cover the 44x33 sensor easily. But I get it's a niche and not applicable to a lot of people's style.
Yeah, it would be nice if the GFX system had a true 645 size sensor, but then it probably would no longer fall into the 'affordable' category. Let's see where things go though. With how quick technology is advancing, and how affordable it's getting, I'm sure it won't be long before we start seeing even larger sensors available for reasonable prices.
Some beautiful shots of the UK. I enjoyed the review, but I also really enjoyed those photos. Really captured the rustic, weathered, loveable decline of the British coastline.
Glad you enjoyed it
i am using Mamyia 645 85 1.9 on the system for portraits and absolutely love it. its nowhere as clean as my 110 2.0 Gf but it gives a organic feel to it almost like film.
Another great review i'll be getting the gfx soon.
To your comment about simplifying the digital post-processing -- totally agree. I've been working on a personal long term project that started with Fuji X-Trans APS-C and which is now morphing into using a GFX50S II. The output is all B&W and, liking what I saw in the Acros for shooting JPEGs, I'm taking RAW files and converting them to the Acros sim with NIK. From my film days I know what Acros is supposed to look like, and starting from that same point every time the adjustments I make are much more consistent and kinda keeps me on track.
I've divested most of my film equipment (there were a few "moments" when the M6 and the XPan went away), which was mostly for "slow" photography. Working with the GFX, I like the look I'm getting with the lens focal lengths longer than APS-C, and and with the GFX files (and the 50MP files are just fine -- not even tempted to go with 100MP).
Cheers, Larry. Yeah, I'm a big fan of the Acros sim from Fuji and almost always use it as a starting point for my BW work. There's many times where the images need little adjustment with that preset.
I agree that the film process is a key to the enjoyment of film.
Bought a 50r after 10 years of shooting film and I can't imagine ever going back.
So I'm considering buying a used GFX 50S and if I do I will also have to adapt my Pentax 645 lenses. Happy this video exists so I can see what I may be getting into.
I absolutely adore the colors of your talking head sections of this video! Any insights how you did that? Also what camera you're filming those on? So good! the bright wights and strong greens, so good
Your first video on the 50r helped convince me to buy it and it’s my favorite camera I’ve ever owned. It’s not perfect but the photos I can get out of it are fantastic.
Glad to hear that!
Thanks for another great video, one that pretty much sums up how I feel about the two mediums. One other aspect that comes into play for me and that is a sense of nostalgia when using film (for various reasons I shoot mainly b+w these days). I enjoy using vintage kit and getting pleasing results from it. Having said that, I love the digital image files my trusty Canon 6D can produce (my go-to for colour work).
We are, indeed, lucky to live at a time when we can indulge in (and get excellent results from) both analogue and digital.
Keep up the great work, Kyle 🙂
Thanks so much, Ralph!
Fantastic, very balanced, video. I have thought about investing in the system for years and thus is super helpful.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I love my Pentax67 and it has been the gold standard for me. You've thrown some figurative bait in the water for me. I'm already a Fuji user. I also shoot 4x5 as well. Now the biggest obstacle is the lens investment. I have so many x-mount lenses. Worth considering though. Thanks for sharing!
Could be worth checking out some older 645 glass, especially from Pentax. A lot more affordable. Cheers!
fantastic vid, lovely images… i like your editing style you have w/ the fuji getting it close to a ‘film feel’ with the color & MF crop /FoV
def no reason to jump off the film process - i say shoot both, love both, but most of all enjoy the journey 🙌🏼
📷🎞📸📷
I have different formats of digital cameras, and the main format for me is the Micro Four Format, because of its size and the 4:3 ratio, and it performs very well. I have a lot of Nikon F optics from the old days, and because of that, I also have a Nikon Df, a Canon EOS 5D MkII, and many more digital cameras. But I'm also a Large format shooter, with a 4x5" camera with a 6x12 back, and the Mamiya 6MF and 7. All of my cameras are full frame. They cover the frame, but I'm looking at the GFX system, as a substitute for some kind of shooting, and therefore it's interesting to listen to you as a film shooter.
By the way, my second camera was an Olympus OM2. I have a lot of feelings, shooting with that camera. Nowadays I have a OM3Ti, and lots of the best glasses from Zuiko. I might have the best of all systems, but I will die as an Olympus OM shooter. By that I mean I will always use film, and if I need a 6x6 or 6x7 or bigger, I always have a solution. But I'm also a 4:3 ratio shooter, and I will always be a m43 man, and sometimes there is more resolution needed. Yeah, I know all of that, but sometimes a GFX might be the perfect solution for me. I don't have the answers, but I search for the solution. Allways, and might find the final solutions for me. I don't care, maybe that's the answer.
Just found your channel! I love your work dude!
Thank you!
gorgeous shots in the 1st 3o secs!
Thanks a lot!
Very nice commentary and reasonable conclusions. Confirmed a lot of speculation I had about what making the jump to GFX might be like and I'm happy I jumped to 6x7 first.
Cheers, Nathan. Thanks for watching.
So it’s a year later and with the release of the 100II, I managed to snag a 100S for $3565 shipped. Adapting Nikon and M645 glass and will pick up that 35-70 most likely too. Thanks for helping guide my choices with your detailed and thoughtful videos.
I can listen to him talk all day
Thank you
I'm looking at as close to possible digital replication of the Pentax 6x7, in particular with 105 for that sweet subject separation. Thinking about the GFX 50R and adapting the 105 to it...hmm. Great video, very informative making me think!!
The GFX system is very good for slow and intentional photographers such as myself. I have been using it since 2019 (GFX 50s, and then GFX 100s). The lenses are a league of their own.
Wow, you really captured some gorgeous photos with this camera.. subbed !
Thank you, Jack. 🙏
Always interesting content.... Thanks
Great video! I'm looking to go a similar route. Ditching some superfluous bodies to get my hands on a 50R to adapt my Mamiya 645 lenses on it. On one hand don't have time to shoot/process film anymore but I've got thousands to scan, on the other hand, shooting digital I feel like I've neglected the fun part of a analog-like process for too long. I've always wanted to get my hands on a GW690III but the prices got so crazy that I put that idea aside permanently. Getting a 50R is like going for trying to find the feeling of shooting a MF rangefinder but one that I would use almost everyday (just like the Xpro2 is the digital camera I use the most, despite owning a couple FF cameras) because conveniently, it would be digital :)
Hey man, I rarely comment on videos but I have to say your work is incredible. Thank you for sharing
I appreciate that, Luke. Cheers.
A super informative video! I was a pro who long ago, walked, no, ran away from LF!
Medium format 6x4.5, 6x6 and 6x7 is way bigger than 35! Digital MF is slightly bigger. Looking at Pro scans of older film shots, I'm so heartbroken! They are plain lousy!
Film projection/enlargement is another world. Way better. But Digital makes more sense. Time! Cost! Convenience! My opinion! I can never afford the costs of Film and processing! Nor that Fuji camera .I have never enjoyed BIG Heavy cameras. Best day with Pentax 6x7 and lenses, traded at Samys CA in LA.! Happy with Leica M6! why sample images from US and Canada? Anyway Bravo!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the system but most important stunning photography 🙌🏻
Thank you.
That was valuable. Yes the slow process of film is just as important as the end print. Limitations are a creative spur.
@Phillip Banes true
Loved this video and many of your other videos as well. Thanks! I recently got the GFX 50R and interested in adapting the Contax Zeiss 45mm. Looks wonderfully compact. Which C/Y to EF adapter did you go with?
I have the fotodiox pro adapter. Cheers.
Great video brother.
Film is getting expensive as F. and you are right, you need to find whatever works for your work.
Saddly that sometimes means expending a lot of money tryng new things.
I will keep shooting film, for sure, but never gonna abandon my digital camera, they teach me a lot, i cannot imagine how much money that will cost me learning on film.
thank you for this overview. I am still thinking whether to get X-Pro 3 with some vintage lenses or go to GFX.
Somehow not that convinced by the price tag...
Would love to see a video on the settings you use on the GFX 50R. Whether you dive into all the features or just shoot with it ‘out of the box’
Hey John, it's nothing too complicated. Mostly just a film sim for previewing, and shooting RAW + JPEG, often in a crop mode.
Super nice video. I adapt the 85mm 1.4, 50mm 1.7 contax zeiss and Minolta Rokkor 1.4 on my gfx and they are 👌🏻
Cheers! Yeah, I've used the 50mm 1.7 a few times as well. Bit of vignetting, but otherwise great!
Great video thanks for putting so much time and thought into it. One question: in the gear used in this video list above you list two lens converters one for P645 to GF and one for EF to GF. Which one of those works with the Contax CY45?
Thanks, James. Sorry for the late reply to this. I'm using two adapters for the Contax. A CY to EF, and then and EF to GFX.
I've found The Archetype Process profiles for Kodak are a perfect starting point for editing digital. I just use them for everything now to start out. I even apply them to my own film scans sometimes.
Archetype is definitely the best film emulation on the market.
@@RussellAlboroto Especially with Fuji cameras. With my X100V and a Glimmerglass 1 with TAP profiles, so hard to beat. It looks just like film.
Have you tried the Lapardin ones?
@@AdrianTache no, never heard of them. I’ll check it out
hook a brotha up
Thanks for this video Kyle. Great to see that you have gone back to the 50R. It’s what I use. What is Your current go to macro lens for using with the 50R when scanning film ? I saw a kipon plus Pentax 120 on the video and also a canon EF I think in the B roll.
Ps.. finally made it to Dinorwic in august. What a haunting place! An atmosphere like nowhere else I’ve been. Thanks for the location inspiration from one of your earlier videos.
Cheers, Pete! I'm currently using the Pentax 645 120 Macro. It's been amazing. And cool to hear you visited Dinorwic. I hope to get back there soon. It's such an amazing place!
What a surprise to see photos from Snowdonia in this video!
Awesome video and great to see the comparisons to film! I have played around and rented the GFX 50R and 50Sii. Both great cameras and sometimes wish I could transition or shoot more on these vs medium format film to save money. But I keep coming back to the look of film more. I would love to see a video on how to edit your GFX files to look more like film like you do in the examples in this video. Thanks again!
Cheers, Nathan! I'll probably do a video at some point sharing my workflow.
I would watch that in a heartbeat.
I love my 50R! Such a versatile camera. It can get a little heavy with certain lenses… Vintage Mamiya 645 manual Sekor C lenses work well it. The 120mm f/4 macro works really well for negative digitalization.
The Pentax 120 has been amazing for scanning negatives as well. Just like the Mamiya, it's nice and affordable.
Beautiful images as always. Those portraits are wowowow. Honestly as medium format as you can get!
Glad you like them!
Not sure there’s a pro film photographer on this planet but I’m adding- this is great!
I just realized the fact such a camera could let me adapt all sorts of glass, even M mount, and that it would be great to be able to mount all of that on the same platform
I've made the switch from film to using the X-Pro3 for almost a year now, and have really enjoyed finding my process, and going to almost mainly doing light edits on my JPEGs, realizing I could do the same with a GFX and use my vintage glass, if needed cropping down to 24x35 when I feel like it sounds really good
This video might just have planted a seed I'm afraid I won't be able to stop growing in a corner of my mind
I hope they'll go wild some day and make a GXF R camera with the X-Pro's optical viewfinder, that would be ridiculous and awesome
I too wish for a GFX with an optical viewfinder similar to the X-Pro. That would be amazing!
I'd love to save up for one of these. I'd love to see the difference in med format
Another great video Kyle! Transitioning back to digital has been hard, and I’ve been researching the gfx line. Your video came out at a perfect time with film prices skyrocketing. Now if only someone would buy my Mamiya 7 so I can get one of these bad boys
Would love to know why you switched from 100s > 50r
I'd imagine you won't have any issues finding a buyer for that Mamiya 7! As for the 100 -> 50. Mostly due to cost.
I added a Hasselblad 501C into my kit this year after having used only digital for about 15 years or so. I missed the process that comes with making images on film...
I also have the 50R and a handful of lenses and really enjoy shooting that camera. I also have the camera set up to shoot digital copy images from the negatives and chromes (I have a book project that I needed high quality 4x5 chromes reproduced) and so shooting the 6x6 negs will be easily accommodated now that I have that running effectively.
While the digital is certainly the easier path to an image, I am happy to have added film back into my shooting. I believe it makes me slow down and consider my shots a bit more and it challenges me technically a lot more. That makes photography more enjoyable for me.
Cheers, Andrew!
Nice. I’ve used Pentax 67, 645 and Arca 69. Loved them and miss them. I use Fuji gfx now 100S. I’d like a 100S that was identical to the original 50S controls. I went with the 100S for autofocus. And for file size when shooting 65::24 pano.
The tilting eye piece on the 50S is a good send for copy work.
I really have trouble understanding why we cannot have the eyepiece systems found on the Pentax 67, Pentax LX, Nikon F3,4,5. These were procameras that were working tools.
The GFX 50S comes close but 50S II and 100S are a step away from being all around professional tools.
Still, very great camera.
The other reason to go digital is just cost. It is a LOT cheaper in the long run…
Again, very good video. I use a lot of Pentax glass on gfx but sadly pixel peeping has caused me to shoot to GF mount. The 45-100 is particularly good and significantly better than the superb Pentax FA (645) 45-85. I was disappointed to see that but a fact is a fact.
Lastly the canon 85mm f1.8 tho it vignettes a bit is every bit as good as the GF 80mm. Much cheaper than Mitakon and autofocuses with Fringer Pro ($$$) adapter. It’s very small and light too.
thank you!
What a great video, Thank you.
A nice roundup of the GFX system's strengths and weaknesses. I am glad I was able to invest into the 50R and 50/3.5 when I got a chance. it's a HUGE step up from APS-C, but it's not so much a leap from 35mm sensors, and I don't think it's even fair to compare the two - I really think the true strength of the GFX system is the 4:3 aspect ratio that really changed the way I compose.
I found with my X-PRO3 (another brilliant camera) I was really constrained by the 3:2 ratio, especially when shooting in portrait orientation. It is really a 'tight' frame and getting an enviromental portrait, a vertical landscape or general street photos with that tight framing really cuts out environmental context, background and makes the image a bit forced. The wider aspect ratio of 4:3 in portrait really lets the compostion 'breathe' and lets you more easily compose with your subject off-center. I find myself shooting in portrait orientation more than ever, and it's really changed the way I look at a compostion.
I had the same feeling when I shot 6x6 medium format, and even more of the same with my Pentax67 - I think Olympus and the MFT system (also with a 4:3 ratio) are on to something and we've been stuck with this legacy 3:2 ratio for far too long - it is a compromise on so many fronts, including printing where you have to crop the image you carefully composed while shooting to fit 8x10 or 11x17 or any of the common sizes, losing resolution and adding work.
Thank's for watching. As mentioned in the vid, I'm a huge fan of the 4:3 sensor, and it's one of my favourite aspect ratios to compose with.
Great video man. Enjoyed that a lot! - Imagine my surprise when seeing my images as sample images at the MItakon 65/1.4 sales section. LOL!
There's a good reason for the apparent similarities between the MItakon and the Pentax 105/2.4 - In "Full frame" terms they both act like a 52mm f/1.1 - 1.2 'ish lens - So the separation really does look the same between the two setups.
Cheers, Jonas! Glad you enjoyed this one. I've been on your site many times reading articles about adapted lenses for the GFX system. Thanks for those, they've been super helpful.
I just ordered a 50R off KEH and I"m so excited to get it, and this video just amplified my excitement 100 fold.
Question: what is that pancake lens you're using, and what adapter did you need to fit it onto the 50R?
Thanks for a great video!