Peter Dinklage - Death at a Funeral Comparisons - part 1 - British original VS American remake
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- Back-to-back comparisons of some of Peter Dinklage's scenes in the two different versions of Death at a Funeral (The 2007 British original and the 2010 American remake). Let the debate begin!
British cast: Matthew Macfadyen, Alan Tudyk, Andy Nyman, Kris Marshall, Rupert Graves, Peter Dinklage, Keeley Hawes, Ewen Bremner, Peter Vaughan
American cast: Chris Rock, Tracy Morgan, Martin Lawrence, Danny Glover, Luke Wilson, Keith David, Peter Dinklage, James Marsden, Regina Hall, Kevin Hart, Columbus Short, Loretta Devine
It's really interesting how different his performances are in the these two films, despite having almost exactly the same lines. In the British version his character seems so much sweeter, kinder, more genuinely in grief. In the American version he seems darker, colder, more ominous, like he's there for the money more than anything. Dinklage is an amazing actor. :)
Jesus Christ died for your sins on the cross. Repent and believe in him or you will be separated from God The Father for all eternity and face hell forever, for all eternity, never ending.,
@@treek10k Noone cares.
British: Please move sir
American: *IM STRAPPED UP B1TCH*
Tbh in the British one he seems a lot more reasonable and understandable but in the American one he’s just seems alot more harsh,greedy,and dark
I always laugh when he says he feels “Cheap”
Jesus Christ died for your sins on the cross. Repent and believe in him or you will be separated from God The Father for all eternity and face hell forever, for all eternity, never ending.,
@@treek10kBut do you know how that makes me feel? It makes me feel cheap!
@@treek10k Well, in this case there's a special hell for spammers like you too...
great acting. totally having the same lines but projected differently.
British is better! Macfadyen and Dinklage are they're wonderful.
The dialogues are the same but the meanings are completely different.
I loved the American version when I saw it, but now that I'm seeing that a British version exists, shot for shot, I don't understand why the American one even exists but as a money grab.
Well he almost turned it down but when he heard about some of the folks involved whom he admired he was basically like ''what the heck, Chris Rock's a comic genius, who am I?". Always tries to work with people he admires I noticed.
Jesus Christ died for your sins on the cross. Repent and believe in him or you will be separated from God The Father for all eternity and face hell forever, for all eternity, never ending.,
Definitly like the british1 better,as said be4 it's more subtle and natural which makes it funnier,the american1 is trying too hard and all the music and overexplaination ruins it.(Like with the bj refference that has scarred me 4life) DINKLAGE IS BRILLIANT in both though, but in the first one he seems sweeter and really in love with the dad,in the american he just seems like a cold goldigger...which actually confirms my point about his brilliantness,how he makes the same character so different!
Hollywood simply can't match British subtlety. More money and higher output doesn't equal quality.
It must have been easy for peter to make the second movie.
personally i like the british version better but the American one has its moments
"Is he doing something with his voice here? The pitch is much higher"
Think about it....
Wow. Dinklage's original performance is nuanced, restrained, hilarious and real. Second go-round, you can tell he's kind of disgusted at how hammy and dumb the remake is and is kind of gritting his teeth and thinking 'just a paycheck, it's just a paycheck, say the lines and get it over with.' He's an artist, he deserves better, and he knows it.
2007 was the best
HECK YEAH!
In the British version his name was Peter? Was he playing himself? XD
Also, I've seen Dinklage in 3 or 4 roles, but Tyrion's the one that sticks out the most in my head, mostly because it's a TV show and I see him weekly, and also it's the first thing I saw that made me notice him (he usually does smaller roles). Is he doing something with his voice here? The pitch is much higher than as Tyrion.
for me its always miles finch from elf
watch the british, it feels more authentic in the character of Peter
He uses his real name in the original, and uses a pseudonym in the remake..that alone says it all.
Fake news
He looks so much older in 3 to 5 years
in british version it is all more subtle, I like that, and you love the character of Peter, in the NORTHamerican version he' totally darker and evil, I didndt like him U.U
wtf Peter comes out in both versions?? sorry ive only seen the american version O_o
Multiverse is cannon
At 7:30 kilt me dead 😂😂😂😭🤣🤣🤣🤣
No, the character's from the States. He's just putting on sort of a "prissy" voice.
british/original version for the win. period.
the British one is the original, the American one "the version", as long as it acknowledges and credits the original, its all good
Is he putting on an English accent for the British version?
I can't really tell.
the british version is better
7:50 ........ wh......WHY?? Omg lol this I freaking hilarious mitch better given the two versions of the same movie but different versions I've never seen the British version of this though
The British version is up for free if you're interested, just search up Death at a Funeral 2007. Though it might get taken down soon.
I like British version
The Left hand shake- a gesture of sympathy?
Dont understand why the american version exists....the british is everything that it needs to be.
its a money grab I think
British one is perfect
Omg, Americans made a remake of it?! Do they have to remake every good foreign film? And that guy who played instead of Matthew Macfadyen... He's just terrible. Honestly, I can't believe what I'm seeing... At least Peter is awesome in both versions.
I am an american and I saw the British version first, it's so much better.
This is the guy who says Snow White is offensive?
American version definitely funnier 🤣 I loved how his character was more ominous
Nothing the Americans do is funnier than the original
@@jakedeane5304 nah it was funnier
It's mainly because the US made the scenes funnier by being extra.
@@Juugo211and that's exactly why it isn't funnier.
Who else found themselves skipping the American version
american remakes of british movies/tv shows consistently fall short of the original
Yes. Thank god, this is as close as Dinklage has ever come to pandering.
Entertaining thank you.
American version better
those Are coffee table rules
Yeah I'm glad I didn't watch the american version now
@wtfinput Sometimes Americans do crazy things with the ingenuity of other countries... like taco kits.
alright then
American one is better.
Hell no.
well at least hes not an angry elf in these movies he was so funny elf also!
The American remake is a disaster!!
It always bugs me how in British films the characters talk like Americans. As an example, I can't speak for the whole UK, but outside of television, I have never heard a Brit say "sure" when asked something. We also don't ever say "Uh-huh" or "God damn it" and if someone did, people would look at them funny.
Really? You’ve never heard a Brit say “Sure”, God damn it” or “Uh-huh”? You’ve clearly never been to Dorset, Hampshire, Essex, Suffolk, Staffordshire or Yorkshire. Counties I’ve lived in and heard all 3 of those words/phrases in.