Sit back and relax with Mr. Boob Gross and learn how to make "art" ◆ Patreon! / piemations ◆ Other Stuff! www.piemations.com/ Robin Nelson / @itsboobin
@@Spyridon1337 The joke is about the use of AI on the internet today. OC either hand-typed an AI-esque response, or used AI for authenticity, but the joke still holds up: This joke is about people copy-pasting AI generated responses into comment sections, OC specifically crappily copy-pasting a likely ChatGPT response to prompts such as: “Write a wholesome comment about a painting video”.
It's interesting to see Piemations making.... Pie Acton Skits? I dunno how to make a pun out of that. But this is really interesting to be honest and hilarious to watch!
@@Piemations Honestly, I would definitely watch more cause i feel like these would be very interesting! Maybe a sequel to this, or how about animation and live action mixing that'll also be cool! (No pressure of course!)
@@Piemations Is it okay to use AI Art cause boredom cause I have some good concepts for characters in my head and I wanna make their designs originated off the ones generated, so is it okay?
@@Plaguedocwhoneedsabreak If you use AI as a way to assist the creative process then it's 100% okay. Like maybe generating an original character (as DeviantArt-y as that may sound XD) and you just take that generated design and just tweak it and draw it yourself! I myself use AI to assist my creative process (but not for art, more so for voice changers, but same intention) As long as you don't use it to "replace" yourself or to take shortcuts it's fine!
"You can do anything" Except draw lesser known characters because they do not use any or minimal images at all, meaning you would have to recreate the image yourself anyways.
@@topsyturvy6516 technically you could, but tell that to the companies making these models. I would first have to find the images anyways and since I want to be an artist (or at least improve), I would want to only reference them anyways. I want to see you make a model for something like Pokemon or Digimon that isn't the most popular characters. I also shouldn't have to make the model myself regardless for one specific character.
@TheStickCollector wasn’t the whole point of this discussion that AI=bad because no effort? And you’re complaining that making your own model takes effort therefore invalidating the point? That’s just how it works. As with any specific niche thing if it doesn’t exist you have to make it yourself
@@saycap Well I would say that is more so for specific mathematical models. Obviously if you tailor one to your needs, it would work. But unless you need the actual model for something important, the point I am trying to make is instead of collecting drawings for the computer model, you can use them as references and study material and learn how to draw it yourself, if that makes it any clearer. Obviously putting in the effort would make it visually appealing, but if you want to be an artist you should learn it the natural way. I personally (think I?) have a mindset of either using the model already there, or put in the time and effort and learn to draw it yourself. A model would be neat to see, but that would also cause the same controversies and probable copyright infringements that these bigger ai companies can get away with. That's my take on it anyways.
@@TheStickCollector Learning how to use AI tools and learning how to make your own art both take time and effort, and both create different results for functionally different reasons. It's equating apples to oranges- one isn't better than the other they just fill different functional niches and both have their unique drawbacks. The issue is that a lot of spaces online are trying to lump both together and have them compete with each other and they shouldn't be. AI now isn't 'smart' enough to replicate human thought, and likely won't be for a long time. It can't do what a human does, and if you try to use it like one you will create sub par results (sound familiar?)- it's still a very powerful tool. Handwork for precision and personality, AI for speed and quantity. Artists and AI bros are both wrong, and both create a lot arbitrary noise. The key is paying attention to changes in industry standard workflows. AI only people will continue to make experientially sloppy products and artists will continue to only be able to put out a piece every week or so, and then get body problems and an ER visit in their 40s. At the end of the day the person who masters BOTH and combines their applications will come out ahead of the curve.
You know, one thing I've seen pro-AI people argue is with good enough photo-editing skills you can scrub the AI jank out of images, but it's pretty clear that's only possible if you've made some oily anime girl on a blank background. That one image of the last supper (I'm sorry, barbecue) with all the copywritten characters... I can't imagine being able to salvage that with less effort, knowledge, and skill than it would require to just create the damn thing by oneself. Anyway, this had me laughing so much. The exasperation is the icing on the cake.
Assuming you're trying to go for a stylized look, at that point, it's better to just make it yourself. Jazza's bro (I forgot his name) has a video where he tries to generate an image but he constantly has to generate, edit, regenerate with the current image, generate, re-edit proportions that actually look worse due to poor prior-understanding of anatomy, etc. The amount of changes would be baffling and too chaotic to wrangle with little to no understaending of art.
why put skill into fixing the ai art and not into learning to draw?? (i know YOU aren't the one advocating for ai art, im just putting my thoughts out there)
@@GuitarOfTime0116 Because after 3 months of studying basic art concepts and another 3 monts studying how generative networks work I can make any image better and faster than 95% of people who have been painting for their entire lives.
@@KAZExNOxSAGAsaying AI art is better than 95% of artists is so wrong not because ha ha ai not developed well yet but because it literally has all of its learning from scalping art from the internet from artists without their permission. It IS 95% of artists. With none of the soul or direction of one.
There is some AI among us. It’s nice to see Piemations vent about his frustrations to his fanbase of crewmates. The way this can cause impostor syndrome for many artists is a hassle.
AI Artists: "You have no authority to tell us what is and isn't art! And we should profit from it, and have rights to it!" Guy who staples random items to canvases: "YEAH!!"
I despise that scam. I was supporting what I thought was an up and coming artist on reddit. Then someone pointed out the artifacting. This isn't helping people, it's just ruining art! I hate having to double check every art piece I like before I appreciate it, it's gaslighting! And it's driving me crazy!
It’s pretty easy to point out an ai generated image. Does it look generic or do something unique? If it’s the former give it more scrutiny and you’ll find the ai smell
Imagine not liking an image because it was generated by AI. It doesn’t make the image look uglier by learning that information, so I don’t really understand how people can have this attitude. I don’t stop liking the sunset just because a human didn’t cause it to happen; neither should this happen to me for an image of a beautiful woman or a landscape.
@@JamesP7People don't like finding out a computer made an ai image because it cheapens the experience. To use your sunset analogy, it's like someone replicated the experience with a cheap projector on a white screen.
The thing that gets me the most about these AI bros is how they somehow act as if this is actually some kind of unique 'skill' that they've developed. They're literally just typing prompts into a box of what they want and the AI does all the work. Like they talk about how they've 'developed certain prompts that get them the best results' and then you get a peek at them and the prompts are literally just things like "Beautiful, Not Ugly, " and so on lol. And then they'll like do extremely minor edits and tell the AI to make it look good as if that somehow means they did something meaningful. These guys are just commissioners. It's no different than say someone just hiring an artist to draw something, and providing feedback on what they make and doing quick mock-ups of what changes they want. Except these people have deluded themselves into thinking that somehow that makes *them* a real artist for just telling a program to do something.
Except the computer can’t draw conclusions and has no preexisting fundamental knowledge so the prompt will have 0 nuance and be taken at literal face value. It’s like commissioning from, well a computer. Not comparable and more soul-crushing. It’s like rolling the dice over and over again to get an image that’s moderately passable so I’d understand why you’d feel proud of it. But I highly doubt the majority of people who use it like that feel like it’s a personal accomplishment. It’s basically the equivalent feeling of getting a bunch of monotonous work done and you want to show the progress off. Really good prompts also take a very high level of consumption/production knowledge and terminology on a very specific topic if you want to get a good image (for example photography. You have to know detailed photo composition and what works to reference to emulate a certain look, and cross reference that with internet literacy to understand what terms are too specific and mess up the image and which ones are too broad/not what you’re looking for. Basically you’re a human SEO algorithm). I’m pretty shit at prompting and I don’t care to learn but there is a science behind it. It’s not hard but it’s just tedious and monotonous (what SEO does). For me and probably everyone else much easier/time efficient to hand draw things and get better results for it. But I care a lot about the specific quality of something, a company who just wants a generic splash image on their website won’t. It honestly would be harmless IF art sites mandatorily curated their stuff to sort AI into the relevant categories, but they just don’t do that and it’s annoying when it’s not what I’m looking for- that extends to the greater internet as a whole too it’s just a Wild West AI slowest right now
Those same “skills” of prompting are exactly the same as what you’d use to commission an actual artist but with syntax to make the ai not break its brain
As someone who got into AI generated imagery from being a commissioner, the main thing I use it for is getting a reference image to take to an artist when commissioning them. It is so much easier to reel off 50 AI images and say "like this but" than it is to describe absolutely everything from the ground up with words. Artists are visual people and they like visual references. It's a fantastic tool, but it ain't art itself. I've also tried fixing up generated images myself in GIMP. Didn't go well. Quickly got to the point of realising "If I want to make this any better I'd need to basically redraw it from the ground up" and the results haven't got any better since then. Haven't let it impact how much I support actual human artists at all.
This skit was KILLING me. I couldn't stop laughing and crying SO HARD at the same time! And that ending... dude, I was gonna freaking lose it that I'm gonna cry of laughter. Robin (Xycron) slowly losing his sanity of A.I. drawings has got to be one of the funniest moments I've ever seen in my life! Pure... comedy... gold. 😂🏆🥇
If you hate AI then you're just full of yourself I draw traditional and traditional has been dead for a long time ever since people learned how to draw with PCs and drawing tablets, if anyone should complain it's me because I've been out of the job for years now but Ive accepted it and never got angry or offended
@@Milkmangood58 Hey man, at least you're putting the work in and actually doing the work to make art. It's the concept of people being considered equivalent or better for typing words into a box, rather than using honed talents and skills, that's unfair and offensive. No need to dig at other artists. Besides, traditional has its own appeal, and requires its own department of skills, so your talents aren't wasted or neglected at all unless you're specifically seeking commissions while not advertising yourself in the ideal spaces.
3:39 Mmm, I sure love when a cryptid manifests in AI generated images that feed off of stolen copyrighted work :3 Makes my bones tingle. Jokes aside, this was hilarious. Always love seen Robin in skits and it's nice to know you're still being creative, given issue of your wrist preventing you from animating. Also, Piemotions is a delightful term for live action skits and I think we'd all endorse you using it. Whichever person on your team came up with it, please give them a cookie. c:
@@JamesP7ai steals from other artists talent. Ai just takes whatever art it likes from an artist and can steal all of the technics and style and effort the artist put into it without any consent. Every generative ai steals because it takes a bunch of things created by others and mushes them together. I cant really create "something new" its just something different ,imagine some1 steals half your idea puts it together with some1 elses idea and calls it his own without any credit.
Absolutely! Here's a positive comment you could leave for the video: "Wow, what an incredible experience watching this video! This Bob Ross-like painter has truly captured the essence of tranquility and beauty on canvas. The way they effortlessly blend colors and bring the scene to life is absolutely mesmerizing. Not only did I feel a sense of calm wash over me as I watched, but I also found myself inspired by their talent and creativity. Thank you for sharing this masterpiece with us. It's a reminder of the beauty that exists in the world and the power of art to uplift our spirits. Truly wonderful!"
You write a sarcastically positive youtube comment about an AI generated youtube comment Copilot Oh wow, this AI-generated comment is so original and unpredictable, it’s almost like it was written by a human with a full range of emotions and experiences. I’m absolutely floored by the depth and nuance of this totally not algorithmically-generated text. It’s like poetry, if poetry was composed by a machine learning model trained on internet comments. Truly, we have reached the pinnacle of artificial creativity. 👏🤖
Hello Piemations my name is Isaiah and I have something important to say to you. God loves you and like any father he wants to help you and keep you safe especially from the devil. But I am not just speaking to you about this I am also talking to your fans about this. God loves you all and especially in the times we our living in we are in need of him more than ever. But the choice is ultimately yours have a nice day Shalom Shalom.
I'm left with a palpable sense that one too many techbros (AKA, as few as one) "helpfully" suggested that Piemations could keep animating regularly by pivoting to AI, and that this video was written and produced specifically as an exasperated retort to that incessant notion. If so, it was completely justified. :P 'Twas a nice watch!
Never stop doing what you love!. I can not tell you how overjoyed I was to see a video from y'all even though it wasn't animated. I can't wait to see what you do next!
Absolutely mesmerizing! Boob Gross has such a calming and soothing presence that just watching him paint is therapeutic. His ability to turn a blank canvas into a beautiful landscape in such a short time is truly inspirational. The way he effortlessly blends colors and creates texture is something I aspire to achieve in my own artistic endeavors. Every stroke seems deliberate and thoughtful, yet he always emphasizes the idea that there are no mistakes, only happy accidents. It's a philosophy that not only applies to painting but can be taken to heart in life as well. Boob Gross is a timeless artist whose legacy continues to inspire countless people around the world. Watching his videos always brings a sense of peace and joy. Thank you, Boob, for sharing your talent and wisdom with us!
I remember making a bob ross skit in high school where bob ross would change actors abruptly and add to the painting, making it a huge unintelligible mess by the end. It made me smile to see someone i’ve been subscribed to for a decade take a stab at doing a skit like this. This was hella funny and i would love to see more skits from you guys.
One time, I asked Bing AI to draw me a fight between the German Empire (the one in 1914) and America Well, it gave the 1933-1945 Germany instead, despite it being against the A.I’s rules
There is no drive, there is no passion, there is no effort or care or soul that goes into AI "art". And until one of these human-made brains decides one day to create an image *of its very own volition,* I will never consider any form of generated image as genuine Art.
@@JamesP7I mean yeah, AI art can be considered art, but I would never consider an AI tech bro typing in a prompt to be an artist. It is art in the same way stock images made with very little effort can be considered art but simply typing into a prompt doesn't make you an artist
@@Tomodrones I don’t really disagree. I just call them “prompters”. The machine is the artist, not the prompter. Sometimes I’ll call them AI artists because that’s a colloquial term that has stuck, but if you directly ask me I don’t consider them artists, at least not unless that individual is already an artist in another field like standard drawing or music.
@JamesP7 apparently, I’ve heard that many AIs, ironically enough, are locked behind a paywall (& many of these websites that are jumping on the AI bandwagon have predatory business practices) add that to the fact that these AI image generators (not AI art) need very powerful computers & have a larger carbon footprint than hiring an actual artist (or just drawing it yourself) So I feel like this AI thing could just be another dumb trend like nfts were, with companies realizing that these AI programs or whatever are actually making them waste money (& then rehire the artists they hastily fired bc “it’ll save them money”)
Knowing Robin hates ai with every cell of his body, this is perfect.
I can relate
The man's justified in his disdain for AI. Completely justified.
Skill issue
@@tombkings6279 I mean yeah, people who use only AI to make art do have a skill issue
Cell? Perfect?
"AI can be your therapist! Or your wife!" That deep sigh got me off guard.
Edit: Guys, be warned. There's some war going on in this thread.
I genuinely can't believe people tried the whole ai gf thing, wtf.
@@joelrobinson5457 Not just tried, are *still* trying. Some people have really sold themselves on the idea that the technology will be limitless.
@@setyourhandlex I freaking wanna die
@@joelrobinson5457it didn't start with ai. Dating sims and even "virtual girlfriends" have existed well before ai.
@@TylerDollarhide no actually I don't mind that, because it's scripted and has thout put into it, some like slay the princess are genuine masterpieces
Remember, if an AI bro ever gives you shit over AI being better than real art, simply draw them pregnant
alternatively you can also inflate them big and round.
Then, draw them getting an education
Someone drew me as fat once. lol
I'd rather not, I don't want them to reproduce
@@anthrolitestudiosNow *that's* a burn!
Sure! Here’s the comment:
Wow, this painting sure is incredible! What an interesting video.
hello joke explainer from siivagunner
@@Spyridon1337 The joke is about the use of AI on the internet today.
OC either hand-typed an AI-esque response, or used AI for authenticity, but the joke still holds up:
This joke is about people copy-pasting AI generated responses into comment sections, OC specifically crappily copy-pasting a likely ChatGPT response to prompts such as: “Write a wholesome comment about a painting video”.
Now that I’m thinking about it at I’m questioning if it was satire or not and if I’ve been bamboozled ._.
@@for4269 I was talking about their profile picture
siivagun
"Who needs real artists when AI can do it?" is like saying "Who needs real friends when you have chatbots?"
It really is lol. And then you get people who will try to argue that "AI is real"...
Seeing how popular ai gf/bf is already make me lose faith in humanity
To be fair, talking to real people is scary 8( /lh
@@malachitep4276 And that won't change unless you do it more often.
yeah, you just can’t. They’re both hollow imitations and it’s incredibly obvious at the moment
4:13 The BLEEP had ONE JOB! LMAO
fuck **
He forgot his job due of the picture
I didn’t notice it 😂
It was probably ai bleeped
fffuck! *****
Prompts for soldiering on even with your hurt wrist, nice creative way to keep the channel going
It's super smart honestly
Heh, "prompts"
@PastelLavenderYT They're getting smarter... they're trying to blend in
SO THE MSM GUY IS HERE. WHAT
p-prompts?
Robin (Xycron) slowly losing his mind was hilarious
We miss those dinner parties
I'm married to 20 AIs.
But why
@@mr.surlaw4239 its an obvious joke
Same
thats a lot of ALs
[SOUNDS OF UTAH INTENCIFY]
It's interesting to see Piemations making.... Pie Acton Skits?
I dunno how to make a pun out of that.
But this is really interesting to be honest and hilarious to watch!
Internally we've been calling them Piemotions. Wouldn't mind doing more if we have more ideas! (This was my only one)
@@Piemations Honestly, I would definitely watch more cause i feel like these would be very interesting!
Maybe a sequel to this, or how about animation and live action mixing that'll also be cool!
(No pressure of course!)
@@Piemations Just ask AI to come up with a skit for you! (please don't hurt me)
@@Piemations Is it okay to use AI Art cause boredom cause I have some good concepts for characters in my head and I wanna make their designs originated off the ones generated, so is it okay?
@@Plaguedocwhoneedsabreak If you use AI as a way to assist the creative process then it's 100% okay.
Like maybe generating an original character (as DeviantArt-y as that may sound XD) and you just take that generated design and just tweak it and draw it yourself!
I myself use AI to assist my creative process (but not for art, more so for voice changers, but same intention)
As long as you don't use it to "replace" yourself or to take shortcuts it's fine!
One of the Disney lawyers in the pictures is now gonna haunt me for the rest of my life. His unhinged jaw will forever be seared into my eyes.
Now that's realism 👍
The further into the crowd you look, the more deformed they become.
I don't like how ai thinks happiness is portrayed as having jaws being dropped lower and lower
Biblical accurate disney lawyer
3:09 that's not Jimmy Neutron that's Johnny Nutrient
Jimmy Neutron in 20 years be like.
Johnny atom
James Isaac Proton
@@Ilickarmpits69LMAO
The real Ai generated content was the numerous lawsuits we got along the way.
these new live-action skits are really funny
It’s a good way to keep his channel going because of his wrist pain
@@riffraff7942 that’s a good point actually yeah
@riffraff7942 yes clearly lol
Oh my gosh! You’re such a good artist! Nobody else could do this.
This is the most NPC comment I’ve ever read (sorry if that was offensive)
@@riffraff7942 thats crazy, its almost as if thats the joke
"You can do anything" Except draw lesser known characters because they do not use any or minimal images at all, meaning you would have to recreate the image yourself anyways.
You know you could just make a model off like 40 image right?
@@topsyturvy6516 technically you could, but tell that to the companies making these models. I would first have to find the images anyways and since I want to be an artist (or at least improve), I would want to only reference them anyways.
I want to see you make a model for something like Pokemon or Digimon that isn't the most popular characters. I also shouldn't have to make the model myself regardless for one specific character.
@TheStickCollector
wasn’t the whole point of this discussion that AI=bad because no effort? And you’re complaining that making your own model takes effort therefore invalidating the point? That’s just how it works. As with any specific niche thing if it doesn’t exist you have to make it yourself
@@saycap Well I would say that is more so for specific mathematical models. Obviously if you tailor one to your needs, it would work. But unless you need the actual model for something important, the point I am trying to make is instead of collecting drawings for the computer model, you can use them as references and study material and learn how to draw it yourself, if that makes it any clearer.
Obviously putting in the effort would make it visually appealing, but if you want to be an artist you should learn it the natural way. I personally (think I?) have a mindset of either using the model already there, or put in the time and effort and learn to draw it yourself. A model would be neat to see, but that would also cause the same controversies and probable copyright infringements that these bigger ai companies can get away with.
That's my take on it anyways.
@@TheStickCollector
Learning how to use AI tools and learning how to make your own art both take time and effort, and both create different results for functionally different reasons. It's equating apples to oranges- one isn't better than the other they just fill different functional niches and both have their unique drawbacks. The issue is that a lot of spaces online are trying to lump both together and have them compete with each other and they shouldn't be. AI now isn't 'smart' enough to replicate human thought, and likely won't be for a long time. It can't do what a human does, and if you try to use it like one you will create sub par results (sound familiar?)- it's still a very powerful tool. Handwork for precision and personality, AI for speed and quantity.
Artists and AI bros are both wrong, and both create a lot arbitrary noise. The key is paying attention to changes in industry standard workflows. AI only people will continue to make experientially sloppy products and artists will continue to only be able to put out a piece every week or so, and then get body problems and an ER visit in their 40s. At the end of the day the person who masters BOTH and combines their applications will come out ahead of the curve.
It's like calling yourself a cook after putting a precooked meal in the microwave
I think a better and more direct comparison is someone calling themselves an artist because they commissioned an artist to draw something.
Wait so I’m not a cook..?
wait, no, stop! that's gatekeeping!/j
So... Gordon Ramsey?
More like stealing food other person cooked and call yourself Chef Ramsey
damn pie's animation gotten so good it looks real now
That's the power of AI animation
The goddamn buzz light year as you hear shouting in the background
Derp eyes
I can hear the repressed resentment in his voice lmfao
You know, one thing I've seen pro-AI people argue is with good enough photo-editing skills you can scrub the AI jank out of images, but it's pretty clear that's only possible if you've made some oily anime girl on a blank background. That one image of the last supper (I'm sorry, barbecue) with all the copywritten characters... I can't imagine being able to salvage that with less effort, knowledge, and skill than it would require to just create the damn thing by oneself.
Anyway, this had me laughing so much. The exasperation is the icing on the cake.
Assuming you're trying to go for a stylized look, at that point, it's better to just make it yourself.
Jazza's bro (I forgot his name) has a video where he tries to generate an image but he constantly has to generate, edit, regenerate with the current image, generate, re-edit proportions that actually look worse due to poor prior-understanding of anatomy, etc. The amount of changes would be baffling and too chaotic to wrangle with little to no understaending of art.
why put skill into fixing the ai art and not into learning to draw??
(i know YOU aren't the one advocating for ai art, im just putting my thoughts out there)
@@GuitarOfTime0116 Because after 3 months of studying basic art concepts and another 3 monts studying how generative networks work I can make any image better and faster than 95% of people who have been painting for their entire lives.
@@KAZExNOxSAGAsaying AI art is better than 95% of artists is so wrong not because ha ha ai not developed well yet but because it literally has all of its learning from scalping art from the internet from artists without their permission. It IS 95% of artists. With none of the soul or direction of one.
Ai cannot be better than artists overall because it is literally parisitical to them. It relies on them to work
Robin, are you being held hostage? You can tell us everything Robin. We'll come save you XD
10th level, thousands of battle droids.
He's just against AI art. This is torture for him.
@@Jaeden-Man89 I know, I was making a joke
There is some AI among us. It’s nice to see Piemations vent about his frustrations to his fanbase of crewmates. The way this can cause impostor syndrome for many artists is a hassle.
Get out of my head get out of my head get out of my head
Among us?
dont think it dont say it dont think it dont say itAAA THIS COMMENT IS VERY SUSPICIOUS AAAGGHHHGHHGHHHH
AI Artists: "You have no authority to tell us what is and isn't art! And we should profit from it, and have rights to it!"
Guy who staples random items to canvases: "YEAH!!"
The irony being that the same people against the former praise the latter
Imagine if Piemations was AI generated and it turned out he was never real to begin with
Nah tech wasn’t that advanced back in the day
@@riffraff7942that’s why they said “imagine” \o/
holy shit, I haven't seen you in a long while
To quote the cop from Suction Cup Man: “well… son of a bitch.”
@@riffraff7942 or was it
I love this boob gross man.
Boob gross is the best I have seen wo far, I think I will Google him to see what else he got to show
you should just ask AI about him
Now this video… IS art.
I despise that scam. I was supporting what I thought was an up and coming artist on reddit. Then someone pointed out the artifacting.
This isn't helping people, it's just ruining art! I hate having to double check every art piece I like before I appreciate it, it's gaslighting! And it's driving me crazy!
It’s pretty easy to point out an ai generated image. Does it look generic or do something unique? If it’s the former give it more scrutiny and you’ll find the ai smell
Ai art has like 3 styles it’s pretty easy to point out
Imagine not liking an image because it was generated by AI. It doesn’t make the image look uglier by learning that information, so I don’t really understand how people can have this attitude. I don’t stop liking the sunset just because a human didn’t cause it to happen; neither should this happen to me for an image of a beautiful woman or a landscape.
How dense you gotta be to fall for AI art?? No wonder AI-doomers say we’re screwed as a species 💀
@@JamesP7People don't like finding out a computer made an ai image because it cheapens the experience. To use your sunset analogy, it's like someone replicated the experience with a cheap projector on a white screen.
help. can't breathe and my AI wife isn't calling an ambulance
the only ambulance she called is missing a wheel and have 5 headlights
My favorite type of Piemation work : animation't
I love how little by little he went crazy for the AI drawings
The thing that gets me the most about these AI bros is how they somehow act as if this is actually some kind of unique 'skill' that they've developed. They're literally just typing prompts into a box of what they want and the AI does all the work. Like they talk about how they've 'developed certain prompts that get them the best results' and then you get a peek at them and the prompts are literally just things like "Beautiful, Not Ugly, " and so on lol. And then they'll like do extremely minor edits and tell the AI to make it look good as if that somehow means they did something meaningful.
These guys are just commissioners. It's no different than say someone just hiring an artist to draw something, and providing feedback on what they make and doing quick mock-ups of what changes they want. Except these people have deluded themselves into thinking that somehow that makes *them* a real artist for just telling a program to do something.
Except the computer can’t draw conclusions and has no preexisting fundamental knowledge so the prompt will have 0 nuance and be taken at literal face value. It’s like commissioning from, well a computer. Not comparable and more soul-crushing. It’s like rolling the dice over and over again to get an image that’s moderately passable so I’d understand why you’d feel proud of it. But I highly doubt the majority of people who use it like that feel like it’s a personal accomplishment. It’s basically the equivalent feeling of getting a bunch of monotonous work done and you want to show the progress off. Really good prompts also take a very high level of consumption/production knowledge and terminology on a very specific topic if you want to get a good image (for example photography. You have to know detailed photo composition and what works to reference to emulate a certain look, and cross reference that with internet literacy to understand what terms are too specific and mess up the image and which ones are too broad/not what you’re looking for. Basically you’re a human SEO algorithm). I’m pretty shit at prompting and I don’t care to learn but there is a science behind it. It’s not hard but it’s just tedious and monotonous (what SEO does). For me and probably everyone else much easier/time efficient to hand draw things and get better results for it. But I care a lot about the specific quality of something, a company who just wants a generic splash image on their website won’t. It honestly would be harmless IF art sites mandatorily curated their stuff to sort AI into the relevant categories, but they just don’t do that and it’s annoying when it’s not what I’m looking for- that extends to the greater internet as a whole too it’s just a Wild West AI slowest right now
"AI bros" god you people are brainwashed
Those same “skills” of prompting are exactly the same as what you’d use to commission an actual artist but with syntax to make the ai not break its brain
As someone who got into AI generated imagery from being a commissioner, the main thing I use it for is getting a reference image to take to an artist when commissioning them. It is so much easier to reel off 50 AI images and say "like this but" than it is to describe absolutely everything from the ground up with words. Artists are visual people and they like visual references. It's a fantastic tool, but it ain't art itself.
I've also tried fixing up generated images myself in GIMP. Didn't go well. Quickly got to the point of realising "If I want to make this any better I'd need to basically redraw it from the ground up" and the results haven't got any better since then.
Haven't let it impact how much I support actual human artists at all.
Didn’t even add Kirby and he showed up as the prompt
Kirb heard about food and manifested
oh my god 4:49 when it cuts from the title card with him smiling to him just standing there like that in the same spot made me laugh so hard
MOM PIEMATIONS JUST POSTED
Shoulda used ChatGPT to figure out a legal defense against those Dinsey lawyers
4:04 the fucking laugh 😂😂😂😂😂
This feels like a Gus Johnson skit
Ah yes Robin Nelson he truly is the one voice to sooth us all
This skit was KILLING me. I couldn't stop laughing and crying SO HARD at the same time! And that ending... dude, I was gonna freaking lose it that I'm gonna cry of laughter. Robin (Xycron) slowly losing his sanity of A.I. drawings has got to be one of the funniest moments I've ever seen in my life! Pure... comedy... gold. 😂🏆🥇
An “AI artist” tried to sell AI art while saying anyone can do it… So why would I buy it?
AI art is offensive to me, I’m a graphic artist and just seeing people type in stuff and getting masterpieces is absurd to me.
Well it's a good thing they're not masterpieces once you look at them for more than three seconds!
Calling them masterpieces assumes they are good in the first place, and they are not
Same is stubid!!
If you hate AI then you're just full of yourself
I draw traditional and traditional has been dead for a long time ever since people learned how to draw with PCs and drawing tablets, if anyone should complain it's me because I've been out of the job for years now but Ive accepted it and never got angry or offended
@@Milkmangood58 Hey man, at least you're putting the work in and actually doing the work to make art. It's the concept of people being considered equivalent or better for typing words into a box, rather than using honed talents and skills, that's unfair and offensive. No need to dig at other artists. Besides, traditional has its own appeal, and requires its own department of skills, so your talents aren't wasted or neglected at all unless you're specifically seeking commissions while not advertising yourself in the ideal spaces.
3:39 Mmm, I sure love when a cryptid manifests in AI generated images that feed off of stolen copyrighted work :3 Makes my bones tingle.
Jokes aside, this was hilarious. Always love seen Robin in skits and it's nice to know you're still being creative, given issue of your wrist preventing you from animating. Also, Piemotions is a delightful term for live action skits and I think we'd all endorse you using it. Whichever person on your team came up with it, please give them a cookie. c:
AI doesn’t steal.
Just like fanart doesn’t steal.
@@JamesP7it does babe.
@@DaburuTori “How’d you end up here in jail?”
“I drew a pink pony a _bit_ too accurately.”
“My God…”
Is that a pregnant latias?
@@JamesP7ai steals from other artists talent. Ai just takes whatever art it likes from an artist and can steal all of the technics and style and effort the artist put into it without any consent. Every generative ai steals because it takes a bunch of things created by others and mushes them together. I cant really create "something new" its just something different ,imagine some1 steals half your idea puts it together with some1 elses idea and calls it his own without any credit.
Absolutely! Here's a positive comment you could leave for the video:
"Wow, what an incredible experience watching this video! This Bob Ross-like painter has truly captured the essence of tranquility and beauty on canvas. The way they effortlessly blend colors and bring the scene to life is absolutely mesmerizing. Not only did I feel a sense of calm wash over me as I watched, but I also found myself inspired by their talent and creativity. Thank you for sharing this masterpiece with us. It's a reminder of the beauty that exists in the world and the power of art to uplift our spirits. Truly wonderful!"
You
write a sarcastically positive youtube comment about an AI generated youtube comment
Copilot
Oh wow, this AI-generated comment is so original and unpredictable, it’s almost like it was written by a human with a full range of emotions and experiences. I’m absolutely floored by the depth and nuance of this totally not algorithmically-generated text. It’s like poetry, if poetry was composed by a machine learning model trained on internet comments. Truly, we have reached the pinnacle of artificial creativity. 👏🤖
His turn to the camera without his glasses at 4:28 is HAUNTING
yo, this animation looks so realistic, i could even say its real life!
Can’t you just fall asleep to his beautiful voice 5:29
Thank you for upholding true art, man. Means a ton to hear ya take the piss out of this computerized crap.
You can hear the barely contained rage behind his voice.
Bob Ross wasn't lying when he said Titanium Hwite is the most important colour
4:27 "I do this just to feel something"
XD
Hello Piemations my name is Isaiah and I have something important to say to you. God loves you and like any father he wants to help you and keep you safe especially from the devil. But I am not just speaking to you about this I am also talking to your fans about this. God loves you all and especially in the times we our living in we are in need of him more than ever. But the choice is ultimately yours have a nice day Shalom Shalom.
I'm left with a palpable sense that one too many techbros (AKA, as few as one) "helpfully" suggested that Piemations could keep animating regularly by pivoting to AI, and that this video was written and produced specifically as an exasperated retort to that incessant notion. If so, it was completely justified. :P
'Twas a nice watch!
You people have become brainwashed snobs you realize that right?
No, I don't think you have that self-awareness
“AI is better than real art!” bros when I show them romolo accolto da giove nell’olimpo
Never stop doing what you love!. I can not tell you how overjoyed I was to see a video from y'all even though it wasn't animated. I can't wait to see what you do next!
4:40 there's no pinkie pie just princess peach and a octopus Kirby?
also no duke nukem or megatron
4:19
He sounds so Confident while typing it
Love how the censor isn't even properly done. He just says f*ck and it beeps for no reason xD
I was so thrown off when I heard the "PIMATIONS" at the end. I totally forgot who I was watching
Xycron (who is clean-shaven) wearing a Bob Ross afro and those dumbass sunglasses makes him look like the perfect AI bro
I love how he keeps breaking character.
'7.5" x 9.5" iPad' always popping up killed me
Absolutely mesmerizing! Boob Gross has such a calming and soothing presence that just watching him paint is therapeutic. His ability to turn a blank canvas into a beautiful landscape in such a short time is truly inspirational. The way he effortlessly blends colors and creates texture is something I aspire to achieve in my own artistic endeavors. Every stroke seems deliberate and thoughtful, yet he always emphasizes the idea that there are no mistakes, only happy accidents. It's a philosophy that not only applies to painting but can be taken to heart in life as well. Boob Gross is a timeless artist whose legacy continues to inspire countless people around the world. Watching his videos always brings a sense of peace and joy. Thank you, Boob, for sharing your talent and wisdom with us!
Well just remember you aren't the artist, the AI is
Good
@@puddingthes_j.wde5t.r0y3r4 lol
Holy Robin did a phenomenal job here
I don’t think you can actually call it art, by definition, it’s just a generated image
It’s often the ones who believe they aren’t beautiful enough, that are beautiful in the eyes of others
0:33 The awkward camera on his butt for a second too long 😂
3:17 Wait... Tow Mater's name is a pun on "tomato"? How did I not realize that until his funeral?
Finally, accurate depictions of future entertainment created by AI. I love the process of "let the market speak" being itself.
Your Animation are getting so much better, Robin almost looks real!
I remember making a bob ross skit in high school where bob ross would change actors abruptly and add to the painting, making it a huge unintelligible mess by the end. It made me smile to see someone i’ve been subscribed to for a decade take a stab at doing a skit like this. This was hella funny and i would love to see more skits from you guys.
One time, I asked Bing AI to draw me a fight between the German Empire (the one in 1914) and America
Well, it gave the 1933-1945 Germany instead, despite it being against the A.I’s rules
This is the longest 6 minutes of my life i felt kidnapped
That was a good point about the “anyone can do this.”
I love robin and his ai art
Not even Duke Nukem wanted to be AI generated.
Nobody steals his art, and lives.
Finally, some genuine footage of AI artists. I never knew what to picture before when someone said AI artist, but now I know!
That name caught me off guard, didn't realize it said it in the description either.
Well well wow nicely done good job. This is very interesting and I can’t wait to see how much you’re going to do your little project. Good job.
The random glances at his face is hilarious
There is no drive, there is no passion, there is no effort or care or soul that goes into AI "art".
And until one of these human-made brains decides one day to create an image *of its very own volition,* I will never consider any form of generated image as genuine Art.
I consider it art.
Art is defined by personal interpretation, not by the creator. And AI creations fit one of my definitions.
@@JamesP7I mean yeah, AI art can be considered art, but I would never consider an AI tech bro typing in a prompt to be an artist. It is art in the same way stock images made with very little effort can be considered art but simply typing into a prompt doesn't make you an artist
@@Tomodrones I don’t really disagree. I just call them “prompters”. The machine is the artist, not the prompter.
Sometimes I’ll call them AI artists because that’s a colloquial term that has stuck, but if you directly ask me I don’t consider them artists, at least not unless that individual is already an artist in another field like standard drawing or music.
@JamesP7 apparently, I’ve heard that many AIs, ironically enough, are locked behind a paywall (& many of these websites that are jumping on the AI bandwagon have predatory business practices)
add that to the fact that these AI image generators (not AI art) need very powerful computers & have a larger carbon footprint than hiring an actual artist (or just drawing it yourself)
So I feel like this AI thing could just be another dumb trend like nfts were, with companies realizing that these AI programs or whatever are actually making them waste money (& then rehire the artists they hastily fired bc “it’ll save them money”)
@@evanwademan5602 Well, unlike NFTs, AI has practical use (and has been used for decades, particularly in gaming).
I'm watching this while drawing, thank you so much for the inspiration Boob Gross!
Man this animation is so good, it almost looks like a live action short !
THE LEGEND WE ALL KNOW AND LOVE RETURNED
EDIT: stopping kids from saying first :/
You are the kid saying first
@@riffraff7942 said the kid who commented 🤓
and i didn't say first bruh 💀
The AI saw an afro and only thought of black people. I do appreciate te sentiment but bob ross did rock that afro better than I ever could.
His pain pleases me
This was a great concept and you executed it perfectly
Wow! How good art! I am real person
This reminds me of CEO apologies by CollegeHumor.
Prompters will not apologize
why did this actually give me asmr tingles?
This was absolutely fucking hilarious, and I desperately hope you make more.
"Who the fuck is that?"
It's a goddamn miracle, an AI skit that Isn't just whinging about AI bad and focuses more on how soulless and lazy it looks
Thanks for the laughs!
this is so wholesome
Amazing work, the future has so many wonders
Why dose this feel like an April fools video that's late
…what?
i loved this :P clever idea! :D
I love you
I loved this and I want more
Great series Boob! It was short lived but it's changed the face of public broadcast tv forever.