Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

How to Integrate ln(x)?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 08. 2024
  • What is the integral of ln x? We apply integration by parts to solve this because it is a product of functions, where ln x multiply by 1 dx.
    We first select ln x as 'u', and 1 dx as 'dv'. Then, we take the derivative of 'u' in terms of dx, and take the integral of 'dv'. Finally, plug them into the formula of integration by parts and we got ' x ln(x) - x + C ' as our final answer.
    #integration #integral #calculus
    INTEGRATION BY PARTS EXPLANATION: → • Integration By Parts F...
    TIMECODES:
    0:00 → Intro
    0:13 → Why Integration By Parts is used?
    0:34 → Selection of u and dv
    1:15 → Derivative of u & Integral of dv
    1:50 → Plug in the terms into formula
    2:26 → We did it!

Komentáře • 33

  • @mtaur4113
    @mtaur4113 Před 6 měsíci

    This is less commonly done and has higher prerequisites, but you could write out ln(x) as integral 1 to x of 1/t dt, and reverse the order of integration. You might have to set up the outer integral as a definite integral, such as int_1 to x of ln(s) ds, so you have a concrete region for Fubini to work with.
    This definite form is an antiderivative of ln, with a specific "+C" built in, which you can rewrite in a simplified form with a generic +C absorbing any unnecessary constants when stating the general antiderivative we were looking for. I got a +1 I didn't need when I did this.

  • @LewisMunene-xo4tq
    @LewisMunene-xo4tq Před měsícem +1

    I have a question

  • @pauselab5569
    @pauselab5569 Před 7 měsíci +5

    My first thought is to use u sub. Let x=e^u, dx=e^udu Then we have integral(ln(x)dx)= integral(e^u*udu) and then integration by parts which clearly simplified because of exponential.

  • @idkyet9458
    @idkyet9458 Před 8 měsíci +16

    why not DI method
    D I
    + lnx 1
    - 1/x x
    since -(1/x)(x) can be integrated stop there
    then you get
    ∫lnx dx = xlnx - ∫(1/x)(x) dx
    = xlnx - x + C

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 8 měsíci +6

      Yeah, that's true. DI method can also be used to get the answer. The one I've used here is just a normal IBP.

    • @RebornKaotic
      @RebornKaotic Před 5 měsíci +7

      its the same process bro

    • @DaanHun
      @DaanHun Před 4 měsíci +3

      DI method is just a way to write down IBP right? same thing.

  • @holyshit922
    @holyshit922 Před 19 dny

    Here it doesnt matter but sometimes it is good idea to choose a constant other than zero
    when we calculate v from dv

  • @user-xr6zh5cd4z
    @user-xr6zh5cd4z Před 3 měsíci +1

    Isn't it ILATE instead of LIATE

  • @icafe36485
    @icafe36485 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Hello, sorry, what software do you use to make this video?

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 7 měsíci +3

      I only use Microsoft PowerPoint as visual display, and Microsoft CLIPCHAMP as voiceover and merge it with the PPT slides.

    • @icafe36485
      @icafe36485 Před 7 měsíci +1

      Thank you🌹

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 7 měsíci +1

      @@icafe36485 You're welcome

  • @mugengabertrand6891
    @mugengabertrand6891 Před 3 měsíci

    Help me in his question Cos^3xdx by using integration by party

    • @Loots1
      @Loots1 Před 3 měsíci +1

      Why?
      [ cos^(2)x][cosx]
      [1-sin^(2)x][cosx]
      Set your u=sinx
      There is no needfor integration by parts

  • @mathsfamily6766
    @mathsfamily6766 Před 6 měsíci

    very nice Integral! can you please show me by another way?

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 6 měsíci +1

      Thanks! Another way to find the integral without performing integration by parts is to use the DI Method, in which we will still be getting the same answer.

    • @mathsfamily6766
      @mathsfamily6766 Před 6 měsíci

      oh! i got it.thanks sir!@@YeahMathIsBoring

  • @ragedgamer2850
    @ragedgamer2850 Před 5 měsíci

    integrate (x^n (lnx)^n )

  • @user-nd7th3hy4l
    @user-nd7th3hy4l Před 3 měsíci

    J=xlnx-x+k

  • @IAmAPeti
    @IAmAPeti Před 4 měsíci +5

    ln ❌️
    lawn ✅️

  • @godisalive6685
    @godisalive6685 Před 8 měsíci +1

    Lol that AI VOICE IS CRACKING ME UP😂😂

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 8 měsíci +1

      It's voiceover generated from text by using MICROSOFT CLIPCHAMP.

    • @godisalive6685
      @godisalive6685 Před 8 měsíci +1

      @@YeahMathIsBoring ya Ik it's text to speech but the ai voice over kinda failed to pronounce word ln that's where It got me

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 8 měsíci +1

      @@godisalive6685 😂😂

  • @coreymonsta7505
    @coreymonsta7505 Před 2 měsíci

    You don’t need to say it’s lnx times 1 lol just let dv = dx

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 2 měsíci

      You're right! I was just intended to provide a better clarification and understanding.

    • @coreymonsta7505
      @coreymonsta7505 Před 2 měsíci

      @@YeahMathIsBoring right I know but I don’t think it does

    • @coreymonsta7505
      @coreymonsta7505 Před 2 měsíci

      dv is just the rest of what’s left over

    • @coreymonsta7505
      @coreymonsta7505 Před 2 měsíci

      Since IBP is taught as a method for integrating products of functions is good to mention it at least though

    • @YeahMathIsBoring
      @YeahMathIsBoring  Před 2 měsíci

      @@coreymonsta7505 Yup, cuz some might think that lnx is just a single logarithmic term and they're confused why IBP is applied here

  • @mikepolioudakis775
    @mikepolioudakis775 Před 2 měsíci +2

    Don't know how much you have to pay for AI voice, but you should consider switching even if you have to pay a bit more. Get an AI voice that knows a little math. "ln" is not "lawn" as in "mow the lawn". Once or twice might be charming but the whole video is about ln so "lawn" gets quickly annoying. Mike